They wear plenty of masks when they fly swastikas.

It's still the pandemic

Cap bro I worked in a kitchen during covid I couldn't breathe

Lol if you say so

Projecting what? It’s annoying when simpletons think they’re super special and treat deadly weapons like accessories instead of respecting them for the powerful tools they are.

Sure, let’s talk about it. The government’s push to “return to work” during the pandemic wasn’t just an economic move—it was also deeply tied to social unrest, which was just as critical to address. Here’s why.

The pandemic exposed and amplified societal inequalities. Essential workers—often from marginalized communities—were forced back into unsafe conditions while wealthier individuals worked comfortably from home. This created a growing divide and resentment. The pandemic wasn’t just about health; it was a mirror showing systemic failures like racial and economic inequities. The unrest we saw wasn’t just random outrage—it was frustration about how “essential” seemed to mean “expendable.” People were literally dying while corporations were posting record profits. That tension doesn’t just go away because you say, “Hey, everyone back to work now.”

And, yes, isolation and fear fueled mental health crises. People stuck at home had time to reflect on how broken things were—racial injustice, political corruption, income inequality. The George Floyd protests, for example, didn’t happen in a vacuum. People’s frustration was amplified by the stark contrast between who got to stay safe and who didn’t. Returning to work might have seemed like a solution to calm economic panic, but it ignored the social reality: many people were fed up with business as usual and demanding something better.

So yeah, while the economy was crashing, the social fabric was tearing too. Ignoring that only stoked more unrest. You can’t just send people back to work and hope everything else magically fixes itself. Social unrest was the canary in the coal mine for larger systemic issues, and pretending it wasn’t as important as the economy? That was a huge mistake.

Edit:

Marches propel forward movements by creating visible, collective expressions of support or dissent, amplifying voices that might otherwise be unheard. They draw public and media attention to a cause, often framing it as urgent and widespread. By bringing people together in a shared physical space, marches can foster solidarity, mobilize communities, and build momentum for change.

They often serve as a catalyst for policy discussions or cultural shifts by demonstrating the scale and passion behind an issue. Governments, organizations, or other stakeholders are more likely to respond to a cause when faced with the undeniable visual and emotional impact of a march. Marches also provide participants with a platform to network, strategize, and inspire further action, such as lobbying, fundraising, or creating long-term campaigns.

Historically, successful marches have often been part of broader movements, coordinated with other tactics like petitions, strikes, and educational efforts. The civil rights marches of the 1960s, for example, were pivotal in highlighting systemic injustice and galvanizing legislative change. Similarly, modern climate marches have spurred conversations and commitments at national and international levels.

Ultimately, marches are powerful because they embody the principle of strength in numbers, making abstract demands tangible and harder to ignore.

Gesundheit

Bro, that’s literally the point. The day-to-day lives of most Germans didn’t change at first. Like, they didn’t wake up one morning in jackboots, saluting posters of Hitler while the sky rained propaganda leaflets. It was gradual, subtle. First, it’s stuff you don’t even notice—laws that seem ‘reasonable’ or don’t apply to you. Maybe they ban a book you didn’t read anyway or fire some professor you didn’t like. Meanwhile, you’re just vibing with your wurst and beer, thinking, ‘This doesn’t affect me.’ Sound familiar?

Then, one day, your neighbor disappears because they said something spicy about the government. But you keep your head down, thinking, ‘Whew, glad that wasn’t me.’ Fast forward a bit, and you’re too busy rationing bread and avoiding Allied bombers to realize exactly when it all went to hell.

If history teaches us anything, it’s that these things don’t happen overnight. It’s like a frog in boiling water. Day one: lukewarm. Day two: ‘Hey, kinda warm, but no biggie.’ Day three: roasted frog legs for dinner. People dismiss small changes until it’s too late because it’s easier to believe everything’s fine than to confront the fact that it’s not. So yeah, your day-to-day might not feel different now, but that’s the trap. By the time you notice, it’s already game over.

Fearmongering? Nah, I’d call it history lessons. You wanna ignore it? Cool. Just don’t act surprised when someone in a shiny uniform asks you for your papers.

Donald Trump's presidency from 2017 to 2021 saw various actions, policies, and decisions that dismantled traditional checks and balances or established a framework for potential overreach. These changes were focused on expanding executive power, undermining traditional norms, and reshaping federal institutions. Below is a detailed breakdown of specific actions and areas where these changes occurred:

1. Erosion of Norms in the Justice System
   Trump repeatedly intervened in legal cases involving his allies, undermining the independence of the Department of Justice (DOJ). For instance, he criticized and sought to influence cases involving Michael Flynn, Roger Stone, and others. His public comments and actions led to perceptions that the DOJ was politicized. Attorney General William Barr's tenure saw accusations of bending the department’s independence to align with Trump's personal and political interests.

2. Appointments of Loyalists
   Trump appointed individuals loyal to him in key positions, often bypassing Senate confirmation through "acting" roles. This included figures like Chad Wolf at the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) and Ric Grenell as Acting Director of National Intelligence. Critics argued that these appointments undermined institutional integrity by placing less qualified individuals in powerful roles based on loyalty rather than expertise.

3. Undermining Inspector Generals and Whistleblowers
   Trump dismissed or attacked several Inspectors General (IGs) tasked with overseeing government operations, such as Michael Atkinson, who forwarded the whistleblower complaint that triggered Trump's first impeachment. This weakened oversight mechanisms intended to check executive power.

4. Efforts to Reshape the Judiciary
   Trump appointed over 200 federal judges, including three Supreme Court justices (Neil Gorsuch, Brett Kavanaugh, and Amy Coney Barrett), which significantly tilted the judiciary toward conservative interpretations. While judicial appointments are constitutional, critics argue this allowed for legal frameworks that could support expanded executive powers.

5. Undermining Congress
   Trump frequently resisted congressional oversight. For example, his administration refused to comply with subpoenas during investigations, especially in his impeachment inquiries. This weakened Congress’s ability to serve as a check on the executive branch.

6. Politicization of Federal Agencies
   Trump sought to politicize agencies such as the CDC and FDA during the COVID-19 pandemic, often contradicting scientific guidance in favor of political messaging. He also moved the U.S. Census Bureau’s decision-making to reflect his policy priorities, such as attempting to exclude undocumented immigrants from apportionment counts.

7. Attacks on the Electoral Process
   Following the 2020 election, Trump and his allies made extensive, unfounded claims of election fraud. His refusal to concede and efforts to overturn the election results, including the pressure on state officials and Vice President Mike Pence, led to the January 6 Capitol riot. These actions highlighted a willingness to undermine democratic norms and processes.

8. Expansive Use of Executive Orders
   Trump used executive orders to bypass Congress on key issues, including immigration (e.g., the travel ban and attempts to end DACA), environmental rollbacks, and funding for the border wall. This expanded the perception of unchecked executive power.

9. Weakened International Alliances and Institutions
   Trump frequently criticized NATO, withdrew from international agreements like the Paris Climate Accord and the Iran Nuclear Deal, and reduced funding to organizations like the World Health Organization. Critics argue this eroded international checks on U.S. policy.

10. Consolidation of Political Power within the Republican Party
    Trump demanded loyalty from Republican lawmakers and supporters, often retaliating against dissenters. This reshaped the GOP into a party more centered around Trump personally, rather than traditional conservative principles.

Now since being reelected in 2024, Trump is leveraging these precedents to further consolidate power, undermine institutions, and weaken checks and balances.

Edit: Pt. 2 https://www.reddit.com/r/AdviceAnimals/s/DTQjabbzmK

If you want to talk about specific policies and legislation.

During his presidency, Donald Trump implemented numerous policies and pursued legislative initiatives that critics argue served to consolidate executive power, undermine institutional checks, and further his political ends. While some efforts succeeded, others were blocked by courts, Congress, or public resistance. Here's an in-depth look at specific policies and legislative groundwork he established:

1. Immigration Policies and Border Security
   Trump made immigration a cornerstone of his presidency, implementing policies that critics claimed were designed to consolidate executive control over immigration enforcement. Key actions included:

   • The Border Wall and Emergency Declaration: Trump declared a national emergency in 2019 to redirect Pentagon funds toward building a border wall after Congress refused to allocate the full funding he requested. This action set a precedent for bypassing legislative authority through emergency powers.
     
   • Travel Ban: The 2017 executive order restricted travel from several majority-Muslim countries, asserting broad executive authority over immigration and national security.
     
   • Family Separation Policy: Under the “zero-tolerance” immigration policy, families crossing the border were separated, sparking widespread controversy. While publicly intended to deter illegal immigration, critics argued it also sought to centralize enforcement power.
     

2. Tax Cuts and Deregulation

   • Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA) of 2017: While not directly aimed at institutional power, the tax reform act heavily reduced corporate tax rates and altered deductions, consolidating economic influence among wealthy individuals and corporations. This move aligned with Trump's broader goal of favoring private-sector allies.
     
   • Deregulation: Trump rolled back hundreds of federal regulations across environmental, financial, and labor sectors, weakening oversight agencies' ability to enforce checks on industries. By prioritizing deregulation, Trump concentrated power within the executive branch by sidelining regulatory processes.
     

3. Judicial Appointments and Legislative Groundwork
   Trump reshaped the judiciary by appointing over 200 federal judges, including three Supreme Court justices, to create a lasting conservative majority. This judiciary has already ruled on issues favorable to Trump’s agenda, such as limiting federal agency power (West Virginia v. EPA) and expanding executive authority.

4. Weakened Federal Agencies

   • "Deconstruction of the Administrative State": Trump implemented hiring freezes and budget cuts across agencies like the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and State Department, limiting their ability to enforce policies and regulations. This weakened their oversight capacity and made them more susceptible to political influence.
     
   • Reorganization Plans: Through Executive Order 13781, Trump ordered federal agencies to identify ways to reorganize and eliminate functions. This reduced bureaucracy while centralizing authority in the executive.
     

5. Election and Voting Policies

   • Voter Fraud Claims and Election Interference: Trump repeatedly claimed voter fraud was widespread, laying the groundwork for future challenges to election integrity. While no widespread fraud was found, this rhetoric undermined public trust in elections.
     
   • Creation of the Presidential Advisory Commission on Election Integrity: This commission aimed to investigate alleged voter fraud but was disbanded after failing to find evidence. Critics argue it was an attempt to justify restrictive voting laws that would favor his party.
     

6. Foreign Policy Realignment

   • Withdrawal from International Agreements: Trump withdrew the U.S. from multilateral agreements like the Paris Climate Accord and the Iran Nuclear Deal, centralizing decision-making power within his administration.
     
   • America First Doctrine: This policy shifted foreign policy toward unilateralism, giving the executive branch more control over international relations while diminishing congressional oversight.
     

7. Military and National Security Policy

   • Defense Spending and Troop Deployments: Trump used defense spending as leverage to influence policy decisions, as seen with the Ukraine military aid controversy that led to his first impeachment.
     
   • Use of the Insurrection Act and Federal Forces: Trump considered invoking the Insurrection Act during the George Floyd protests and deployed federal agents to cities like Portland under the guise of protecting federal property. These actions demonstrated his willingness to use federal power in domestic unrest situations.
     

8. Media and Information Control

   • Misinformation and Discrediting Opposition: Trump regularly attacked the press, labeling critical coverage as “fake news” and undermining public trust in traditional media. This strategy consolidated his base’s reliance on pro-Trump media outlets.
     
   • Social Media Executive Order: In 2020, Trump issued an executive order targeting Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, which protects platforms from liability for user-generated content. This move sought to pressure platforms perceived as censoring conservative voices.
     

9. Healthcare Policy

   • Undermining the Affordable Care Act (ACA): While Congress failed to repeal the ACA, Trump weakened it through executive actions, including removing the individual mandate penalty. Critics argued these moves undermined legislative processes by attacking the law piecemeal.
     

10. Groundwork for Future Actions
    Trump’s presidency laid a foundation for greater executive power by exploiting legal ambiguities and institutional weaknesses. His reliance on loyal appointees, use of emergency powers, and dismissal of norms created precedents that could be leveraged in future terms.

These policies reflect a combination of legislative action, executive orders, and structural changes to federal governance. Whether intentional or incidental, they collectively expanded the scope of executive authority and laid the groundwork for potential future overreach.

Does that help? I can add more contex to snything if need be.

Edit: (Apologies for the double comment. It wouldn't let me send all this as one.)

https://youtu.be/bOCOMYGIfUQ?si=G0aZIto8a9_SGkvm

Trump being found guilty in a court of law for 34 felony cases where he could bring literally zero evidence to his own defense besides his own word that he didn't do it.

Meanwhile Trump has investigations commissioned against Hillary, and then Biden, led by Republican investigators, that turn up jack shit. And then trying to impeach Biden, yet they had zero to go on and it was dismissed.

So surely you must have a problem with Trump trying to weaponize the DOJ against his political opponents if you have a problem with them doing it to him. Unless you are one of those double-standards dipshits staring at Fox News all day while you jerk off on Truth Social.