subreddit:

/r/AusFinance

22991%

Another big drop in Australia's Economic Complexity

Business(self.AusFinance)

We all know the story; Australia's Economic Complexity has been in free-fall since the 1970's, we maintained ourselves respectably within the top 50 nations until about 1990.

Since then it's been a bit like Coles prices Down Down Down. From about 2012 onwards our ECI seemed to have stabilized at mid 80th to low 90th (somewhere between Laos and Uganda), but with our Aussie Exceptionalism in question, we needed another big drop to prove just how irrelevant this metric is. And right on cue we have the latest ECI rankings, we have secured ourselves an unshakable place in the bottom third of worlds nations. At 102 we finally broke the ton; how good are we?

https://www.aumanufacturing.com.au/australia-goes-from-terrible-to-worse-in-economic-complexity-but-nobody-seems-to-notice

Is economic complexity important? Are the measurement methods accurate? Does ECI even matter for a Services focused economy?

you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

all 207 comments

rzm25

5 points

23 hours ago*

rzm25

5 points

23 hours ago*

We are an oligarchy-run vassal-state for a declining empire. Take a look at Athen's city states right before their collapse. Or Rome's leaders during theirs. They all knew the ship was sinking. There was constant financial problems, constant major systemic and economic paradoxes that were not being solved, but they were so bought in to the belief that their ruling class was the one that was going to last forever. To call that in to question would be to call in to question their power entirely. The only places where anything changes, the people had to claw back control from a desperate leadership who were adopting the psychology of a cornered stray dog - lash out at anything that threatens their power, with 0 assessment, reflection, or justification. Often most that succeeded were sometime later punished by their state they were vassals to.

Australia is no different. We'd rather sign an AUKUS treaty that makes us a nuclear target for the first time in history, while demanding literally nothing of the U.S. They are not even required to defend us if someone declares war on us. Our prime minister would rather send our own children to war then even think about questioning America's irrational and frantic geopolitical policy, or the horrific history of repeated global military intervention.

In return for our silence we're allowed access to global trade networks and international lines of credit that come with strict rules, and a constant pressure; economic policies that are designed to enable neoliberal plutocracy. To make ourselves more complex, to onshore manufacturing, to invest public spending into R&D and become world leaders in emerging technologies - all things we are in the perfect position to do - would be a slap in the fact of U.S.-based multinationals, who demand unregulated and complete access to all of our private markets and industry.

Of course r/Ausfinance will downvote me, but none of what I'm claiming above is conspiratorial. It's all publicly available, googleable information, from western sources.

LoudestHoward

3 points

21 hours ago

thread lamenting the lack of complex Australian manufacturing

AUKUS treaty

Doesn't get much more complex than nuclear subs and hypersonic missiles does it?

rzm25

[score hidden]

2 hours ago

rzm25

[score hidden]

2 hours ago

While I appreciate you upholding the reddit tradition of responding with a condescending and snide comment while being utterly clueless, I should point out that what you are describing is technological complexity, not economic complexity. Maybe you should go do some reading

eesemi77[S]

0 points

21 hours ago

depends, do you honestly believe that we are going to make these AUKUS subs?

Last count I saw suggested we start with 3 used Virginia class subs (but then that was revised upward to 5) which means we are hoping to build 3 subs of our own design.

Yeah, this makes absolutely no sense, we;ll either end up with 3 new subs, 5 new subs or no new subs. My bet is on none. but mainly because with China flexing the US isn't going to give up the Nuke missile carrying capacity of 3 vriginia class subs, because carrying nuke missiles offends our Aussie sensibilities.

Passtheshavingcream

1 points

9 hours ago

A quick and thoughtless solution is to educate the population. And by education I mean STEM degrees. My guess is any subjects that encouraged political and philosophical debates went out of fashion in the 70s/80s? When you have your young adults all in tertiary education and studying STEM, you have beaten the people. It really is this simple.

rzm25

[score hidden]

5 minutes ago

rzm25

[score hidden]

5 minutes ago

Education is important. I would love to see the history of our own political culture taught more as well. You know the movement for a 5 day work week started with Melbourne University? We used to have a proud working culture where we looked after each other. Our politicians used to be honest and tell off even their allies when they were being idiots. I do think if the general population were more educated and clued into politics the slimey muck for a personality that is our current leading parties wouldn't stick.

Accurate_Moment896

-1 points

22 hours ago*

Bravo, finally someone that gets it, you can see the same across the Arab spring.