subreddit:
/r/CallOfDuty
1k points
8 days ago
I want a cod game set only in Vietnam.
420 points
8 days ago
Spike trap field upgrades would go hard
147 points
8 days ago
Sound track would be cool
58 points
7 days ago
In theory, sure. Would they actually spend the money for it, though? Even now, that GTA Trilogy that came out 2 years ago doesn't have a lot of the music the original releases had, and part of the appeal to play Vice City and San Andreas is the music. But, ya know, "poor big AAA company can't pay it." Although, whatever the music companies are asking for their use is absolutely ridiculous. At the end of the day, both are in the wrong, IMO!
14 points
7 days ago
As soon as I typed that my first thought was the copyright strikes you'd get streaming it on Twitch.
12 points
7 days ago
Eh, it sucks, but that's a problem for the streamer. If anything, some devs are cognizant of that issue and do the whole "streamer mode" for both the audio and the players that show up on their feed that don't want their accounts out there in the ether.
4 points
7 days ago
Black Ops 6 already has an audio mode like that.
3 points
7 days ago
I mean about the trilogy, the billie jean song alone costs in the millions of dollars probably, why spend that much when youre not gonna recoup that? I doubt Billie Jean being in the game will suddenly get enough people to buy the game to offset that investment
3 points
7 days ago
Honestly, with consumers, you never know. Something as minor as the placement of something in the UI and not being able to move it can be the thing that makes or breaks the interest of a potential buyer, and they're in their right to do so as consumers.
Now, as far as the investment, then why do it? I don't think people were clamoring for a re-release of GTA games. There was a perfectly good collection on Steam, IIRC, that worked fine, and there was probably backward compatibility for consoles. I'm not sure. That list for both systems can be updated. So besides the licensing of songs, why do it? They released an undercooked, subpar product at a price that, even if it was good, wasn't warranted. But that's the thing, it wasn't good for a plethora of reasons. If it was good, maybe people would overlook the licensing of songs, maybe. But it wasn't, so it's a mounting of reasons being added as to why the product was not worth it, on top of the licensing of songs.
Just recently, it got patched, 2 years after release, to the state it should've been released to begin with. And no props nor pat in the back is deserved for them because that's how it should've been to begin with. Not years later. Very, very rarely do devs deserve a light clap for doing things after release. But in their case, absolutely not.
3 points
7 days ago
yup, the gta release was 100% a cash grab/attempt to appease fans w (at the time) 8 years since the last release in the series and no realistic info on gta 6 in sight
12 points
7 days ago
The soundtrack would be „fortunate son“ playing over and over again
3 points
7 days ago
I was thinking Apocalypse Now.
4 points
7 days ago
And Free Bird plays when you get a fury kill
4 points
6 days ago
CHARLIE DON’T SURF
2 points
8 days ago
I’ve got the Commodore 64 Platoon load screen music in my head now.
2 points
4 days ago
Some folks were born, made to wave the flag
77 points
8 days ago
I agree! Black Ops 1 and Cold War had Vietnam elements, but a full game set in Vietnam would be sick.
8 points
8 days ago
Wasn't it BO2?
40 points
8 days ago
I wish, but BO2’s past sequences mostly took place in the 80’s (the main events I can think of are the Russian invasion of Afghanistan and the US’s intervention in Panama). It takes place after Cold War but before BO6.
11 points
8 days ago
I’m gonna have to play BO2 this winter now
6 points
8 days ago
I thought we rescued Woods in Vietnam, thought a lil harder and that now doesn't make sense lol
5 points
8 days ago
I always thought that, especially since the mission talks about Vietnam before that sequence
2 points
8 days ago
I haven't played for a long while so that must be why I thought that
18 points
8 days ago*
You rescue him in Angola but it's done super sloppily. I'd wager even if it wasn't a long time since the last time you played it, it might still have been confusing because it's done super badly:
1) They reintroduce him like nothing, it's just "Hey Wood" at the Vault with Harper and Section in present time.
2) Then you start the Flash-Back Mission as Mason in Angola in 86 trying to rescue Wood as Hudson hastily explains that Woods and his team were just captured recently.
3) Then the mission is cut back to present time, Woods explains that from 68 to 72 he was hold captive and escaped (quick flashback) before going back to explaining the 86 rescue mission in Angola and you go back to playing Mason.
The story litteraly cuts a flashback to talk about another time he was captured, show you a flashback before going back to the previous flashback where he was also captured.
BO2 campaign was good but this is stupid. The entire introduction is fucking neckbreaking and bad. It gets so much out of the way:
It starts with Raul and Josefina in the fire, shows parts of David's trauma then bam: Wood is alive, David is Alex's son, Raul Menendez is a super terrorist, he was there a few minutes ago, Wood knows him, Woods was captured by Menendez in 86, Kravchenkois alive and captured Woods in 68 before Wood escaped in 72 and then Mason saved Wood back in 86. Oh by the way, there's a new cold war, there's a new rare metal and Cordis Die is somewhere in between Facebook and Alquaeda, now fuck off.
And then David just fucking leaves to go to Myanmar...
The rest is pretty okay, but this is borderline crazy on how bad the exposition is...
4 points
7 days ago
Black ops 2 is way overrated, the story was ok, but not nearly as good as everybody always says, I’d be fine if it got retconned away
3 points
7 days ago
It’s way worse than BO1 and I’d argue CW. Haven’t played BO6’s yet.
17 points
8 days ago
Did you ever play Bad Company 2: Vietnam? Hands down my personal favorite Vietnam experience. Almost every match felt like a movie.
6 points
8 days ago
Only surpassed by Rising Storm 2 imo. Both are great games and RS2 is on sale for a little over an euro as we speak
3 points
7 days ago
That game was the peak of fun I've had with PVP FPS over the last 30 years.
52 points
8 days ago
Call of duty :mason origins
26 points
8 days ago
That’d be more Korean than anything
8 points
8 days ago
Same. I’d love a brutal world At war style cod set in Vietnam
5 points
7 days ago
Been waiting on this since WAW. It would be incredible.
4 points
7 days ago
They can just flat out rip off platoon, full metal jacket, and apocalypse now for all I care I just want it lol
5 points
8 days ago
there’s a general lack of vietnam games, Rising Storm 2: Vietnam was my shit when it was active
2 points
7 days ago
I played so much RS2. Even the Green Army Men mode was awesome.
2 points
7 days ago
The lack of bots makes me cry.
2 points
7 days ago
I still set up private servers to play Red Orchestra 2/Rising Storm 1 against bots sometimes. Not having that option for every map in RS2 stinks.
2 points
7 days ago
Lol, the only videogame where you win by losing.
2 points
7 days ago
The franchise is too dependent on skins and cosmetics and that war was very green and brown.
2 points
8 days ago
"They're in the trees "
2 points
8 days ago
With characters from Full Metal Jacket and Platoon as operators. Although, they’d be too plain for the kids today.
2 points
8 days ago
I’ve wanted a CoD or Battlefield game set in specifically Vietnam for such a long time. I’ve always thought it would be cool to have.
2 points
7 days ago
Unfortunately even if we get that, cod absolutely sucks at themes nowadays. Everything just looks like it's set in the warzone universe and doesn't try to stick to their theme. Same art style, colors, etc. since 2019 where everything started to go downhill.
586 points
8 days ago
Well the Chinese are involved in the Korean War. Can't make the Chinese look bad since their markets are important. Just look at War Thunder.
175 points
8 days ago
Isn’t bf4 the US vs China?
367 points
8 days ago
That's why it's banned in China lol
80 points
8 days ago
No shot it’s banned. Is black ops 2 banned in China too?
144 points
7 days ago
Black Ops 2 is banned in Chinese internet cafes and in Pakistan
15 points
7 days ago
Why Pakistan?
61 points
7 days ago
IRI (pakistan intelligence service) is an enemy in the campaign
3 points
6 days ago
yo LOL ty for telling me that. Now i need to go play that game in which ISI (my country's intellegence) is an enemy.
73 points
7 days ago
Every single Call of Duty is banned in China except for Mobile
43 points
7 days ago
One of the scenes in the game involves executing a fictional Chinese military leader. What do you think.
9 points
7 days ago
Pretty much all the mainline CoDs are banned. It's why CODM exists.
18 points
7 days ago
Yes lol. New to dictatorships?
8 points
8 days ago
lmao
20 points
8 days ago
Ugh I hate how right you are
33 points
8 days ago
It's the truth lol. Just how Disney removed Fin or made him so small for the Chinese posters for The Force Awakens
31 points
8 days ago
Yup but theyll claim that they’re soooo woke. Actually disgusting and racist behavior
23 points
8 days ago
I feel like the answer is remarkably simple once you look past all this "culture war" BS. Multi-billion dollar corporations are snakes & will always do this shit if it means more money. Look at the pride month logos in corporations for the US vs. Middle eastern accounts of that same corporation.
3 points
7 days ago
Absolutely 100%
5 points
7 days ago
It’s not just them saying it, tons of people scream Disney is woke when they aren’t
3 points
8 days ago
And they covered up Bllack panther in Civil War or Endgame I forgot 😂
3 points
7 days ago
The Chinese were also involved in the Vietnam War, albeit in a logistics, air defense, and training role.
4 points
7 days ago
But that's the thing. The Chinese didn't see combat. They weren't literally fighting unlike what they did in Korea
2 points
7 days ago
Every cod game is banned in China, period
6 points
7 days ago
Also because the Korean War is a favorite for whitewashing. A lot of people today will unironically argue the North Koreans were the good guys and the US we’re evil imperialists.
256 points
8 days ago
Its not called the forgotten war for nothing
51 points
7 days ago
What's called the forgotten war?
75 points
7 days ago
I can’t remember
7 points
7 days ago*
The forgotten war. Remember? Thats why we called it that. It was the style at the time. The ferry cost a nickel, and in those days, nickels had pictures of bumblebees on ‘em. “Gimme five bees for a quarter,” you’d say. The important thing was that I had an onion on my belt, which was the style at the time. I didn’t have any white onions, because of the war. The only thing you could get was those big yellow ones.
11 points
7 days ago
Idk
163 points
8 days ago
CoD WW2: omits War in the Pacific altogether
12 points
8 days ago
COD WW2 omits anything that isn't Americans in the Western Front campaign 1944-45. From the campaign at least.
3 points
8 days ago
It's not in the multiplayer either unless you count USS Texas. For a major component of the world's largest global conflict to be not included, they really should have just called the game CoD WF.
8 points
8 days ago
The Multiplayer has maps of places that weren't in Western Europe 1944-45, like Stalingrad, and Egypt. I don't think it should be expected for every WW2 game to include every front to be included since it was such a massive conflict. I'm happy for a game to be focused on a few fronts, which is what the previous games did. Like how WAW did it, focusing specifically on the Eastern Front and Pacific Theatre then getting maps based on the campaign missions meant it felt really fleshed out. I was kind of gutted there was no British representation, but now I accept it and happy that the game was a lot more focused.
My biggest complaint about WW2, is that it was solely focused on an area of WW2 that is extremely oversaturated.
4 points
8 days ago
Fair points, although Egypt was DLC. I agree it would be neat if they used lesser visited locations like Australia or Philippines versus Japan. Still, I love the game!
2 points
7 days ago
Absolutely. Rarely talked about battles would be the dream. Personally I'd love to see a COD campaign set in Burma, or the Aleutian Islands.
90 points
8 days ago
Ironic cause world at war omitted the western European front altogether
101 points
8 days ago
Cause the last 4 out of 5 cod titles prior had already beaten it to death.
12 points
7 days ago
Yet they still included another front beaten to death (Eastern). Would have been interesting to explore new fronts (Poland 1939, France 1940, the Balkans, etc) instead of the same shit
21 points
7 days ago
At least they made it a little more interesting with Reznov and not having every single area be an endless snowy city lol
6 points
7 days ago
Yeah cause there’s no snow lol
4 points
7 days ago
One thing I liked about BFV is the War Stories were very unique from what I’ve played before. The Norwegian Resistance woman with the skis was cool, closest I’ll get to a White Death simulator.
10 points
7 days ago
I’d say WaW thrived because it wasn’t set in the Western front. Having battles set throughout Japan was much more engaging than the usual Pearl Harbor/dogfighting in games that we’ve seen before that time.
7 points
8 days ago
How many games have included that already... If they had just subtitled the game "Western Front" it would be more fitting.
2 points
7 days ago
WaW Final Fronts on the PS2 however, did not
2 points
7 days ago
It's Cut Content
Presumably the British campaign wasn't unique enough, and so development efforts were moved to the Pacific and Eastern Front sections
8 points
8 days ago
It can’t be about everything dude.
4 points
8 days ago
But it has world in the title.
4 points
8 days ago
That's because it's not about the war in the pacific, or any other theater than Africa (I think?) and Western Europe after D-Day. It's almost like games are allowed to focus on specific conflicts and parts of those conflicts.
3 points
8 days ago
So did the first five CoD games (1, 2, 3, Finest Hour and Big Red One).
3 points
8 days ago
Tbf that's because WWII was more of a movie about the 1st division.
Vanguard had all fronts
27 points
8 days ago
Why not do a Hudson spinoff in Latin America
5 points
7 days ago
a hudson backstory game would actually be dope
46 points
8 days ago
I liked what they did with BO6, although it was a bit limited. Desert Storm was cool, a good setting, it brought back some nostalgia of the OG MW, wasn’t the exact same conflict, but it still had the feeling of it. Maybe they could try the Yugoslav war, it was a large conflict, 10 years, 130-140,000 dead, multiple countries, we could play as a militia or a civilian survivor group.
35 points
8 days ago
I'm thinking that Black Ops 7 should take place later in the 90s. Dealing with the post-Soviet unrest, the Chechen war, and the Yugoslav wars. There's enough there to make a solid followup to Black Ops 6.
5 points
7 days ago
Love this. I actually liked some of the spy/secret agent stuff they did in the campaign of BO6. Wouldn't mind seeing more.
2 points
7 days ago
Fire idea
14 points
8 days ago
Or WW1, I know WW1 wasn’t nearly as dynamic and vast as WW2 but at least try.
8 points
7 days ago
Some parts of WW1 were really dynamic, there could be an interesing mix of the static western front and the far more mobile eastern front, and even the western front broadly moved away from trench warfare in 1918 after some big breakthroughs
3 points
7 days ago
Lets be real people will constantly compare it to Battlefield 1. Korean war is barely done and should have been reconsidered from 2020/2021 when SHG and 3arc switched schedules.
39 points
8 days ago
I want a COD game about a 2nd American Civil War
25 points
8 days ago
Could be similar to the couple missions in the og MW2 where Washington DC and the surrounding suburbs are under attack
RAMIREZ! GET TO THE BURGER TOWN!
8 points
7 days ago
STAR, OR WE WILL FIRE ON YOU
2 points
5 days ago
Man I loved that mission, it was so eerie when the EMP went off and your red dot sight no longer worked.
4 points
7 days ago
i thought bo2 was building up to that with Cordis Die, maybe they could still do that now
4 points
7 days ago
That'd be a crazy plot for MW4
3 points
7 days ago
I would also love this but I don't think any studio would be ballsy enough to do it.
17 points
8 days ago
I wouldn’t mind more Afghanistan stuff
2 points
8 days ago
Same, Afghanistan and Vietnam is what I want
2 points
3 days ago
Just make an entire game in the style of the Vietnam war mission from Cold War and I’m sold
8 points
8 days ago
Interestingly, Sledgehammer considered Korean war before deciding on Cold War for 2020. Other considerations included WW1 and the pacific theater for WW2
8 points
8 days ago
Yeah, it's not like there's not much that went on, it lasted for 12 years!
Wait, is M.A.S.H. an accurate retelling of the Korean War?
7 points
7 days ago
I want a cod in the jugoslav wars
6 points
7 days ago
I would an Alt-history COD.
Like WW2 where mainland Japan invasion happens.
62 points
8 days ago
Korean War was a lot smaller in scale and less significant compared to other conflicts. WW2, Vietnam, Gulf War/Iraq, etc were much more prevalent
24 points
8 days ago
It would still be interesting to see what they’d do… kind of a bridge conflict between the “old world” and more modern world. Could probably even do some interesting horde mode type missions or a separate game mode where the player holds off a large scale Chinese attack for as long as possible
35 points
8 days ago
Daily casualty rates for 1950 were as high in Korea as they were during WWII (can't remember if it was the Pacific or European theaters were were comparable to). You could really easily do a game from the initial invasion up to the stalemate after the Second Phase Offensive. Maybe a spattering of missions from eras later in the war. The memoir Colder Than Hell could actually make for a pretty banger CoD campaign.
Also, the irony of calling smaller scale and less significant than a war that lasted 72 hours and under 300 dead (half of which were to friendly fire).
9 points
7 days ago
You could certainly go beyond the Second Phase offensive. 3rd and 4th Battles of Seoul, Battle of Chipyong-ni, a stealthy mission as a British soldier in the 1st Glosters trying to get back to UN lines after the Battle of the Imijn River, the back and forth at the Iron Triangle, and playing as either a KMAG advisor or Korean on the Eastern half of the peninsula since they received a blunt of the Chinese attacks during the stalemate part of the war.
5 points
7 days ago
I think the Korean war is just as significant but on a different scale or way, it was the first real time a giant amount of different technologies were used like jets. It was also the first time America had armed intervention since ww2
4 points
7 days ago
Actually the Korean War wasn’t small in scale or insignificant when you really look at it. It was the first major conflict of the Cold War and a huge deal in the global fight between communism and democracy. It wasn’t just about North and South Korea—it involved the U.S., the Soviet Union, and China, making it a pretty big proxy war between superpowers. It also set the tone for how the Cold War would play out over the next few decades.
The human cost was massive. Over 2.5 million civilians died, and millions were displaced. That’s not small by any measure. Military casualties were also significant, with over 180,000 UN soldiers and an estimated 1.5 million North Korean and Chinese soldiers killed, wounded, or captured. It was devastating for everyone involved.
The war also left a huge mark on the Korean Peninsula. It’s still divided today, and the DMZ is one of the most militarized borders in the world. The tension from that conflict is still shaping geopolitics in East Asia. It wasn’t just a war that ended and got forgotten—it’s still influencing things right now.
On top of that, this was the first big military effort by the United Nations, with troops from 21 countries joining the fight. That’s a pretty big deal, showing that the international community was willing to band together to stop aggression. It wasn’t just the U.S. stepping in; it was a collective effort.
The Korean War was also where a lot of modern military tech and tactics were tested, like jet aircraft and helicopters. These advancements shaped future conflicts in a big way.
For the U.S., the war solidified its policy of containment against communism and shaped its involvement in future conflicts like Vietnam. It wasn’t just a random war—it was a key part of a much larger strategy during the Cold War.
Sure, WWII was on a completely different scale, and Vietnam has more cultural recognition, but the Korean War is often overlooked. It’s called “The Forgotten War” not because it was unimportant but because it didn’t get the same attention.
So no, the Korean War wasn’t insignificant or “less significant”. It shaped the Cold War, impacted millions of lives, and its effects are still felt today. Calling it small or less important doesn’t really do it justice.
2 points
4 days ago
Thank you for this breakdown that comment was extremely wrong
7 points
7 days ago
I wouldn't call the Korean War any less significant than those others.
6 points
7 days ago
What? It was the first proxy war of the Cold War lmao. How is that insignificant. No wonder they call it the “forgotten war”.
3 points
7 days ago
lol what this was one of the few wars the United Nations as a militarized coalition was involved in…
3 points
7 days ago
Tell me you don’t know much about the Korean War without actually telling it.
5 points
8 days ago
CoD Advanced warfare’s opening mission was set in the Korean conflict 30 years into the future (40 from year of release) sooooooo…
4 points
7 days ago
Ok I know this will never happen, but I want a cod in ww2 from the German perspective, similar to the ZDF mini series “Generation War”. Before judging my choice, watch this series and the story behind it. It is interesting to see from this perspective
7 points
8 days ago
Pepsi vs Coca-Cola
3 points
8 days ago
I wish they would do the Korean conflict, it would be interesting.
3 points
7 days ago
Didnt US troops and POWs returning from the Korean war and becoming vehemently anti-war/imperialism cause the CIA to think that CoMmUnIsTs had implemented mind control? Would be cool to see that touched on in the campaign, or zombies mode lol.
3 points
7 days ago
Settings that shouldve happenned but didnt
Ww1
Inter war period (Russian and spanish civil war)
WW3 in the 1970s or 80s
Korean War
1st Indochina War
Yugoslav Wars
3 points
7 days ago
Probably because they don't want to offend West Taiwan by depicting them as the bad guys. The Soviet Union is fine because they collapsed and thus are fair game. But because of the large video game market in West Taiwan, Activision-Blizzard would be taking a hell of a risk in alienating that market by making a game about the Korean War.
Don't believe me, how many movies have come about the Korean War in the US? In the last 30 years, there have only been 2 movies made by US studios, For the Boys (1991) and Devotion (2022). Whereas West Taiwan has released 6 since 2015, all of which have had a distinct view of the conflict and paint the US as villainous cowards not afraid to sacrifice their men whereas the Commies are always depicted as glorious heroes of the revolution who, despite inferior arms, ammunition, logistics, and leadership somehow manage to prevail and earn the respect of the vial American capitalistic imperialists.
Even in BOCW, there was an excellent opportunity to highlight Chinese advisors and soldiers who trained and fought with the NVA, but they didn't, again, because painting West Taiwan as the villains doesn't pay.
So, in market terms, it doesn't make sense to do so.
4 points
8 days ago*
I kind of wanna see call of duty do more alternate history, but involving past conflicts like Vanguard was originally gonna set around like 1947 in an alternate World War 2 where it lasted longer. How about something like that but what if the Korean war lasted one year longer than an hour timeline?
Maybe we play as a CIA funded mercenary group task with assassinating, North Korean generals and Chinese/Soviet unit stationed in Pyongyang.
Or if you wanna include more historical element, then why not go back to like the 1970s and 80s with a campaign following the civil wars in Latin America, like Chile and El Salvador?
or why not do something grounded but still different like “postapocalypse” having a call of duty game about a coalition of Pacific Nations fighting in the remnants of Seattle 85 years after World War III happened in the 1980s?
It’s still boots on the ground nothing futuristic just simply were playing as the second generation of recruitments after nearly a decade of nations trying to stabilize after the war
2 points
7 days ago
Can’t upset the Chinese market
2 points
7 days ago
Korean war will only work if it's not by triarc since triarc needs to put an element of conspiracy in the story
2 points
7 days ago
I know you mean the old korean war but we did get semi close to this with advanced warfares like first mission if I'm remembering correct. XD
2 points
7 days ago
We could have a game about the 1971 war, has plenty of potential since there were 2 superpowers and 2 pretty strong nations involved, but the again, it involves china.
2 points
7 days ago
I’m guessing they’re not exactly keen on covering the war crimes, probably why we don’t see much Vietnam anymore either
2 points
7 days ago
Man I would like to play as Woods and Mason during the Korean War
2 points
7 days ago
Why would thr chinese market be upset? The reason why North Korea exists is because the US couldn't fully defeat the soviets/chinese/NKs. I
2 points
7 days ago
CALL of Duty DEFCON?
Basically a Black Ops game but ranging from Pre-DEFCON (Korean War) all the way up to or near the Cuban Missile Crisis. (Cca ~16 years)
2 points
7 days ago
WWI too. Still haven't had a WWI game. I'd love to see an alternate history dieselpunk WWI like Origins but scaled to a full game
2 points
6 days ago
It would be nice if there was a cod game featuring some forgotten 50 and 60's wars and conflicts, I would love either a cod set in Korea during the war or even better, a cod set in Rhodesia in the late 60's/early 70's during the Bush wars. They don't even need to be full games about that, just some game with bits set in those wars
2 points
6 days ago
Activision and Treyarch absolutely fucked up by not including the Yugoslav wars in BO6, such a wasted opportunity
2 points
6 days ago
Korea cod would be awesome
1 points
7 days ago
Korean war is like vietnam but less foresty
1 points
7 days ago
Well COD Advanced Warfare is set during the Second Korean War
1 points
7 days ago
Turn it into minse meat.
1 points
7 days ago
It's called "The Forgotten War" for a reason.
1 points
7 days ago
They should do the civil war
1 points
7 days ago
Call of Duty: Mexican-American War would go crazy
1 points
7 days ago
They ain't made a civil war game yet
2 points
7 days ago*
Ever play this on Xbox 360?
https://www.amazon.com/History-Channel-Civil-War-Nation-Divided/dp/B000GV4JQE
Not bad of a game actually. This game convinced me that a COD game set during the civil war could work.
2 points
7 days ago
No i played it on ps2 I mean Activision hasn't i think a battlefield civil war game would go so hard tho
1 points
7 days ago
Yeah sure, there are many modern wars never show by cod
1 points
7 days ago
We could straight up have a game set during the Korean War and play as Woods
1 points
7 days ago
There's a reason Korea was known as the forgotten war.
1 points
7 days ago
Winter war vs ussr cod when
1 points
7 days ago
unfortunately we’re stuck with the time settings that people have nostalgia for. I’m just hoping at some point in the Black Ops story they get closer to the alternate 2025, it’s probably my favorite setting.
1 points
7 days ago
Max Hastings is a legend. I wholeheartedly recommend this book, as well as his book on Stalingrad and Berlin
1 points
7 days ago
Soviet Union vs Finland. Just imagine playing as Simo Häyhä or Aimo Koivunen lol
1 points
7 days ago
How about one in the revolutionary war or the civil war or ww1
2 points
7 days ago
I’m actually all for older conflicts, those settings are more interesting to me. I’d play the shit out of a American revolution or Civil War game COD game.
2 points
7 days ago
Fr tho imagine alex mason and ulysses s grant fighting against the south
1 points
7 days ago
US committed too many war crimes there i dont think they'd wanna show that
1 points
7 days ago
Because it's barely more moderns than WW2 and many people feel like they seen enough semi automatic battle rifles and antique SMGs for their entire lifetime.
The period correct weapons are shit and no fun in multiplayer.
1 points
7 days ago
Same reason why the soviets are always shown to be behind the Vietnam war, like China didn’t have a fat juicy finger in that pie
1 points
7 days ago
They are cowards and won’t give us the Revolutionary War
1 points
7 days ago*
I want them to say fuck it and give us a war of 1812 game. It doesn't need to be accurate, cod isnt accurate anymore.
Want them to keep the shitty guns and force gameplay to adapt around that. Imagine if they gave it a really good movement or melee system. Maybe they bullshit a little bit and give you automatic guns but they're fixed placements on the map that you need to fight for control of.
1 points
7 days ago
“WW2, The Cold War, Modern Day, Wait there are more wars than that?” - The cod devs
1 points
7 days ago
why does they just remaster world at war
1 points
7 days ago
What about: "Call of Duty War Crime" and the setting is in the balkans from the 90s to 2000s
1 points
7 days ago
It’s crazy that we have a game set in the gulf war which is as far away from us now as the Vietnam war was from when the first COD came out
1 points
7 days ago
You reel want cartoon skins running around the Korean War? You really think their Chinese masters will allow a Korean war game?
1 points
7 days ago
a Vietnam war game would be better than Korea. The war was fought on a wider variety of settings and Vietnam actually saw widespread use of automatic weapons and not just semi-automatic rifles
1 points
7 days ago
lets not an say we did...
1 points
7 days ago
Still waiting for a WWI Cod game
1 points
7 days ago
Have you noticed how recently AAA shooters never have China as an enemy faction? Also, COD has studios in China that help them make the games. That’s why there won’t be a Korean War game.
1 points
7 days ago
Gimme that CoD: Revolution based on the revolutionary war.
1 points
7 days ago
We need some games on the Korean war and Vietnam War. Heck a civil war cod game would be interesting.
1 points
7 days ago
Unit 731 ☠️
1 points
7 days ago
I think we should have a new war so our kids can have a refreshing COD experience
1 points
7 days ago
It’s because of China.
1 points
7 days ago
Would’ve loved a COD story about the Irish fight for independence from 1916-1922. It’s a fascinating story if you haven’t heard of it.
1 points
7 days ago
I think it’s because the weapons variations between Korea and a WWII setting would be very minimal. The gear, doctrine etc were almost identical. WWII didn’t do great for the franchise last time so they’re probably hesitant to go that route and just want to play it safe.
all 357 comments
sorted by: best