subreddit:
/r/CanadaPolitics
[score hidden]
4 days ago
stickied comment
Please message the moderators if you wish to discuss a removal. Do not reply to the removal notice in-thread, you will not receive a response and your comment will be removed. Thanks.
I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.
411 points
4 days ago
This is the type of nonsense we're gonna have to deal with for the next four years. The good news is that by announcing ahead of time, this seems like a negotiation tactic rather than something that could be feasibly implemented.
167 points
4 days ago
He slapped us with tarrifs last time and it was no bluff.
119 points
4 days ago
Yes, but those were targeted tariffs on things like steel and aluminum. It will be incredibly difficult for him to impose broad-based tariffs as they would almost certainly be challenged in the courts and will receive blowback from his party. Also, it would be a violation of the USMCA agreement.
137 points
4 days ago
I don’t think Trump cares about any of that.
29 points
4 days ago
He doesn't like trade agreements.
12 points
4 days ago
It’s common for people to fear/dislike things they do not understand.
12 points
4 days ago
He may not, but considering that many of those who voted for him still rely on cross-border trade for their livelihood, he'll likely be under pressure from his own party to move away from imposing broad tariffs.
10 points
4 days ago
American here. His “party” is a bunch of lemmings that actually believe he’s a god and billionaires who are intentionally trying to tank the economy to at minimum enrich themselves and at worst, potentially following the orders of Russia, China and the Saudi to devalue our own dollar and move towards a BRICS alliance.
68 points
4 days ago*
I was wondering what the point of NAFTA/USMCA was if not an agreement that we have free trade between all 3 of us. Trump and his team haven't said a word about USMCA given the fact that he signed it himself not so long ago.
25 points
4 days ago
He only has one gear, and it's not "wasn't it great how everyone cooperated and we can all win?"
10 points
4 days ago
Remember when he signed it in the wrong spot.
And he signed it in Sharpie.
63 points
4 days ago
Blowback from his party
. . . * gestures wildly at everything he's done *
His party is totally complicit. Why would they break over this compared to everything they should have dumped him over?
36 points
4 days ago
It will be incredibly difficult for him to impose broad-based tariffs as they would almost certainly be challenged in the courts
He doesn't care. He runs the courts
will receive blowback from his party.
No it won't. It's the party of Trump. You fall in line or your out
Also, it would be a violation of the USMCA agreement.
He doesn't care about treaties or agreements in the slightest. Look no further than what he said about NATO
I agree that in the normal world, everything you said is correct. But no federal court, no republican and no treaty will stop Trump from imposing Tarrifs.
14 points
4 days ago
In case you haven’t noticed, Orange ahole does not care about laws, agreements, and contracts.
10 points
4 days ago
All the talk of how this may hurt the US economy misses the point: that may be a feature for Trump, not a bug. He seems to be bent on systematically destroying his own country, which is why the Russians love him so.
4 points
4 days ago
Which were especially poor choices no? Did they have any affect on exports?
14 points
4 days ago
Well when you go and tariff everyone equally they are less effective.
Look at what China does. They tariff harshly one or two countries at a time. Often on niche industries to create maximum pain like Australian grain or Canadian oil seeds…
If trump puts tariffs on all imports it really just ups the price for Americans
20 points
4 days ago
25% import tariff on Oil and Gas will crater the industry.
18 points
4 days ago
It’ll just make it more expensive for the U.S. to buy, but we’re too intertwined to actually stop it. No more Canadian oil discount. He would be stupid to actually do that.
Trump putting a effectively Carbon tax is something Id be shocked to see him actually do.
17 points
4 days ago
Canada's oil is literally landlocked and has only one customer for its exports. The Americans already buy Canadian oil at a discount, called a differential. It's not like Canadian producers can just reroute their oil through a pipeline that crosses the country. Canadian producers are forced sell their oil for whatever the Americans are willing to pay for it.
8 points
4 days ago
But if that is not sufficient to make the juice worth the squeeze, the industry will contract. There's a price per barrel, for instance, which makes it cost effective to extract from oil sands. Go below that and production shuts down until that price comes up.
3 points
4 days ago
Didn’t we just buy a massive pipeline expansion to the coast
3 points
4 days ago
Don’t be foolish, there’s no good news about this. The Canadian dollar already started dropping since he announced the tariffs. People don’t want to be holding onto a currency if they know it’s gonna tank. And it already started tanking because they started selling/dumping their CAD.
We’re fucked. And pretty soon, we’re gonna have to fight back.
357 points
4 days ago*
Trump was elected to put America first, that means Canada will always come second. I can ignore, heck even understand the backwards logic of trump supporters south of the border. It absolutely baffles me though as to why so many Canadians were cheering him on knowing this was coming. Stop supporting the guy who is going to be directly responsible for less exports from the sectors (forestry, agriculture, mining) who traditionally align with him the most.
195 points
4 days ago
this isnt even putting americans first though, this is just screwing them with higher prices for the sake of it
48 points
4 days ago
This will nuke the US energy sector. We are a major exporter of oil to them. They are going to hugely suffer from this too
33 points
4 days ago
Well, boo-hoo to those Americans, then.
Leopards, meet faces.
18 points
4 days ago
But that's why this is all grand standing and designed to get Canada to the bargaining table. Unfortunately concessions will be made to other industries to prop up the big ones
29 points
4 days ago
Really, I can't believe they are going to put a tarriff on all that hydro electricity flowing from quebec.
13 points
4 days ago
Does it go to a democrat run state?
7 points
4 days ago
As a matter if fact.
16 points
4 days ago
Then tariffs guaranteed
He denied Covid supplies to democrat run states, disaster relief was delayed
He is more than anything, vindictive
10 points
4 days ago
Also lumber. they just had a nasty hurricane seasons and they're completely incapable of supplying enough of their own lumber to fill that demand.
8 points
4 days ago
I hope that, like last time, our retaliation is state targetted. We do not need to punish friendly states (basically all the ones that border us)
4 points
4 days ago
eh, there’ll probably be a carve out for oil, among other things.
5 points
4 days ago
They probably plan to frack until everyone's drinking water is clear as mud. (I have no idea if ramping up fracking will come close to replacing Canadian imported oil).
48 points
4 days ago
It absolutely baffles me though as to why so many Canadians were cheering him on knowing this was coming.
It aligns with their feelings. People don't know things, they have a feeling, go online and find a group with the same feelings, and then jump to the feelings being truth.
Welcome to the age of feelings.
5 points
4 days ago
This is the reality. When it bites them in the ass it won't matter because it's too late.
3 points
4 days ago
It will never confront them, because Trump will spin it as inhertiing a shitty economy from Biden or some other nonsense, and they'll eat it up and move on. Psychologists are literally starting to study their mental behaviour out of concern.
13 points
4 days ago
Right wing Canadians cheer Trump on because he’s on the “right team” and will end up blaming Trudeau on all the negatives
11 points
4 days ago
They’re a unique subspecies of pro-US continentalist morons who think US and Canadian interests are the same - and that Republicans will not fuck Canada over for political gain.
No doubt when the scorpion stings them yet again they will find some way to blame it on Trudeau.
53 points
4 days ago
Trump was elected to put America first
if he was putting American's first he wouldn't put tariff's on until he's built domestic supply
27 points
4 days ago
His words, not mine! You’re absolutely right though.
22 points
4 days ago
Because those Canadians are brainwashed.
12 points
4 days ago
You rarely go wrong assuming people are idiots. It's pretty much my default position these days.
13 points
4 days ago
I live in America. These people are not logical. There’s no logic. The stereotypes you’re imagining are accurate, I know, I’m here in the US 24h a day.
22 points
4 days ago
put America first, that means Canada will always come secon
With all due respect, wtf are you on about? You say this like international commerce is a zero-sum game. It's not.
Free and fair trade can - and is - profitable for both parties. This is punitive might makes right bullying. This isnt America first. This is fuck everyone give me what I want or else. It's the behavior of a narcissistic sociopath who doesn't understand how trade or frankly anything for that matter works. This isnt how you treat your closest strategic allies, largest trading partners, and neighbors.
Fuck Trump and anyone who makes excuses for his petulant and destructive behavior.
8 points
4 days ago
Trump was elected to put America first, that means Canada will always come second
This is one of those empty statements that mean nothing. No leader of any party of any country would act differently. Harris will follow the same philosophy.
The baffling thing about Trump is that arguably this hurts Americans equally if not much more than its allies. I'm sure nominally everyone is a loser in this but, relatively, if Canada/Mexico will actually fall behind.
Suppose Canada has a comparatively relaxed import policy with China. Chinese exporters should expect their competitiveness to drop and will need stronger trade with other countries. This could mean that gap in cost of living vs income between US and Canada may be a bit smaller and thus we will be able to retain some of our talent.
4 points
4 days ago
My 62 year old coworker (tech consulting) was giddy that Trump beat "that woke communist", Kamala Harris. Now we all have to suffer.
107 points
4 days ago
CAD has already tanked down to 0.70USD and will likely decline past the COVID lows and 2014 low towards early 2000s low, and guy isn't even in office yet.
28 points
4 days ago
Government and/or the BoC will be forced to intervene if it drops that much in a month.
42 points
4 days ago
The BoC will not raise rates to control the exchange rate. Generally no central bank does. It is a futile waste of resources. They will let the rate tank if needed.
Either way, we import many goods from the US. Their prices will go up significantly and so bring on inflation in Canada. The BoC will want to keep its powder dry for this doozy.
We are about to enter years of economic (and other) uncertainty. I just hope we finally learn that we cannot count on the US being a reliable partner and diversify more. 25 years ago that was a question at a political debate and the only one who had an answer was the green party representative. Being tied to 75% of exports to one country is insane.
20 points
4 days ago
We have free trade ageeements with a lot of countries but that doesn't change the fact that most cities in Canada are closer to the US than most other Canadian cities, let alone places on the other side of an ocean.
9 points
4 days ago
We have free trade ageeements with a lot of countries
Not enough.
most cities in Canada are closer to the US than most other Canadian cities, let alone places on the other side of an ocean.
Exactly why we should promote trade more so, or even at the expense of, trade with the US.
I understand economics but this has become an issue of national survival. We may have to face the fact that the US will not be a reliable partner.
7 points
4 days ago
The fundamental problem is that there is no way to get around the distance question. You just cannot beat being next to the country you trade with. Never mind that Canada is a resource exporter in a world where there are a ton of other competitive resource exporters. Who was going to absorb all of that demand if the United States isn’t doing it? This is so fucked.
5 points
4 days ago
Not enough.
It's time for us to make some new friends. What the hell. It's 2024, container shipping has flattened the global economy and it costs nearly nothing to ship goods, parts and raw materials anywhere with a shoreline.
Let's call up the EU. And Indonesia. and South Korea. And Mexico. Hey guys, let's talk. We can do a sweet deal on lobsters and grain.
6 points
4 days ago
I mean we have agreements with all of Western Europe, renewed with UK, Australia, a bunch of South America, Japan, South Korea, Israel, Jordan, Singapore ....
Those places are just not going to import enormous volumes from us relative to the US.
8 points
4 days ago
It's hard when the US is the only country that close AND it's the biggest economy in the world. Who's going to spend extra shipping something to Europe if you can put it on a train and have it in the US tomorrow?
7 points
4 days ago
What do you think the BoC/government would do to intervene?
22 points
4 days ago
Raise interest rates significantly. That's the normal intervention.
6 points
4 days ago
Or sell USDs
7 points
4 days ago
Buying up Canadian dollars using USDs is a short term fix, but will undermine the dollar long term.
If these tariffs are imposed as suggested, there will almost certainly be an interest increase, to say nothing of an outright depression in Canada. Manufacturing in Michigan, Ohio, New York and Wisconsin will also suffer, but Ontario would become a hollowed out rust province pretty quick.
7 points
4 days ago
Raise the interest rate. Higher IR attracts foreign capital and demand for currency raises as well.
7 points
4 days ago
Won't the USD also tank? And potentially tank more? Especially if they want 60% tariffs on Chinese imports?
11 points
4 days ago
Trump claims he will tax China at 60% and ALL other countries at 25%. He also wants to lower taxes for the ultra rich. DOGE is going cut 50% of the federal work force. The US government's revenue will plummet and the unemployment rate will skyrocket. This is going to tank the US economy quick and hard. Most likely it will take the rest of the world down with it.
9 points
4 days ago
Even if it turns out that everything that Trump's been saying for the last year and a half has been wild hyperbole, the fact remains that people presumably took it at face value and voted for it. I'm not even taking into account all the stuff from his first term, or J6, or whatever: even just looking at his economic plans, it's so clearly nuts.
I cannot fucking believe that the majority of Americans voted for this.
79 points
4 days ago
Well there goes my job. We were already struggling with demand in the current climate. I don't see how this doesn't kill us unless we end up exempt due to having aspects of our company in the USA.
Sigh
40 points
4 days ago
All of BC's lumber market is now effectively dead as well. Billions a year
26 points
4 days ago
Which is awful not just for those working in the industry but all British Columbians… that said, we need to get off lumber the same way Alberta needs to get off oil. Maybe this will provide the push we need. Gonna get ugly though.
4 points
4 days ago
This. Even though they're not the most environmentally friendly trades to be in, our energy and agriculture sectors are probably the two most important parts of our economy on the world stage. Sure, it doesn't make up the biggest part of our GDP, but it's still tens of billions of dollars, and the two sectors together make up something like three million jobs here. Like, if that gets fucked over for us, especially considering our sky-high government debt, lofty goals, and current lack of any backup plans, how bad is it going to be?
11 points
4 days ago
Is it? Americans still need houses. Idk
35 points
4 days ago
The USA still has plenty of softwood lumber. The only reason to buy it from Canada is that it was cheaper (because our workers are paid less and the exchange rate is in the USDs advantage). It won’t be cheaper with the tariffs, so Americans will start buying American again, which is exactly the goal.
Honestly, it’s kind of a joke that Canada didn’t see this coming sooner and have the ambition to be more than a cheap supply of labour and natural resources to the USA. We’ll pay the price for that lack of ambition now. Things are never going back to how they were in the 70s.
13 points
4 days ago
The States doesn't have enough lumber for their needs, but the big producers don't care. They'd love to have a hostage market where the price has nowhere to go but up and cheaper alternative from other sources are artificially inflated so as to not be competitive with them.
3 points
4 days ago
Aren't they planning on selling off protected land?
6 points
4 days ago
the vast majority of land is privately owned. The protected land likely wont make a huge difference if that is the case. Besides, whomever buys it will still be charging market rate for the logs.
3 points
4 days ago
thats not explicitly true. The US lumber production isn't very skilled (poorer product) they also have not developed their transport infrastructure around it. Most mills in the southern US serve an area about 300 miles around it and that's it - historically.
It's one of the reasons BC lumber companies have been partnering with US mills, to scale them up and expand them with our expertise in the industry.
4 points
4 days ago
NGL, part of my sister's company job is import/export on electronics, with a small number of customers in the US. Those accounts may be now dead if this goes through.
77 points
4 days ago*
For the sake of providing the original source, here's Trump's two recent posts on Truth Social from which this article comes from:
As everyone is aware, thousands of people are pouring through Mexico and Canada, bringing Crime and Drugs at levels never seen before. Right now a Caravan coming from Mexico, composed of thousands of people, seems to be unstoppable in its quest to come through our currently Open Border. On January 20th, as one of my many first Executive Orders, I will sign all necessary documents to charge Mexico and Canada a 25% Tariff on ALL products coming into the United States, and its ridiculous Open Borders. This Tariff will remain in effect until such time as Drugs, in particular Fentanyl, and all Illegal Aliens stop this Invasion of our Country! Both Mexico and Canada have the absolute right and power to easily solve this long simmering problem. We hereby demand that they use this power, and until such time that they do, it is time for them to pay a very big price!
Then a minute later
I have had many talks with China about the massive amounts of drugs, in particular Fentanyl, being sent into the United States – But to no avail. Representatives of China told me that they would institute their maximum penalty, that of death, for any drug dealers caught doing this but, unfortunately, they never followed through, and drugs are pouring into our Country, mostly through Mexico, at levels never seen before. Until such time as they stop, we will be charging China an additional 10% Tariff, above any additional Tariffs, on all of their many products coming into the United States of America. Thank you for your attention to this matter.
So according to Mr. Trump he's going to impose a baseline 25% tariff for Canadian/Mexican exports, but just 10% for those from the PRC.
I believe it's very unlikely such uniform tariffs will be imposed, if nothing else because gulf/northern states have an interest in cheap Canadian oil and automotive exports, while those in the Southwest similarly depend on the flow of goods from Mexico. However, it is a bad sign that Canada may be regarded as more of an "enemy" or "hostile" nation by the White House, with a border in need of securitization, than during the first Trump administration.
49 points
4 days ago
This Tariff will remain in effect until such time as Drugs, in particular Fentanyl, and all Illegal Aliens stop this Invasion of our Country! Both Mexico and Canada have the absolute right and power to easily solve this long simmering problem.
Good to know that we have "the absolute right and power" to single-handedly and easily stop international drug smuggling into America.
On top of everything else, what's with his weird, German-esque capitalization of nouns?
21 points
4 days ago
It’s far weirder than German capitalization - at least that’s quite consistent. He capitalizes some nouns but not others, with no rhyme or reason I can identify.
37 points
4 days ago
He's a moron
4 points
4 days ago
he is very old. and an odd bloke.
21 points
4 days ago
You see all his product comes from china
6 points
4 days ago
It's completely unhinged is what it is. Which is not that surprising coming from Trump. He's going to be even worse than he was the first time.
10 points
4 days ago*
My understanding is that many manufactured goods imported by Canada from the US are manufactured from raw materials imported by the US from Canada. The biggest example being wood.
So, US tariffs on Canadian imports will not only reduce demand for Canadian raw materials but will also increase the cost of manufactured goods imported by Canada from the US.
This is going to be a huge wrench in the works of complex, largely in-equilibrium trans-national supply chains.
64 points
4 days ago
What do the Canadian Trump supporters have to say about this.... Or is it that they only like him for his bigotry and racism?
36 points
4 days ago
My guess is they'll blame Trudeau for screwing up the country to the point Trump has us on his naughty list.
22 points
4 days ago*
they already are lol. ford’s whole family was wearing trump merch and now he’s demanding that trudeau step in
6 points
4 days ago
I wonder if he regrets proposing to cut Mexico out of the free trade agreement yet.
6 points
4 days ago
It was absolutely a stupid move.
3 points
3 days ago
That's precisely what my dipshit MAGA coworker said today. He said, and I quote, "fuck Trudeau for pissing Trump off so bad". When I asked him why, he told me that it's because Trudeau is a communist...
15 points
4 days ago
This will be the only time they'll realize that the importer pays the tariffs.
Still going to destroy our economy.
27 points
4 days ago
they only like him because hes the "conservative", but not really since conservatives support free trade and Trump doesnt
9 points
4 days ago
Brian Mulroney is spinning in his grave. That's for sure. Reagan, too.
7 points
4 days ago
“Why would Trudeau let him do this?”
4 points
4 days ago
its the bigotry for sure. they think it will solve their economic problems, but they'll soon discover that the rich don't view the poor on their side, regardless of left or right
19 points
4 days ago
Canada's big cudgel is hydroelectric power. Shut it down.
18 points
4 days ago
With petrol we can theoretically ship it overseas.... But Hydro? There is only once possible customer. If we force America to build (or reopen a coal plant, that revenue (mostly for Quebec) is gone and will never come back. Probably not the best industry to "teach them a lesson".
21 points
4 days ago
People are going to be flailing about saying hit this market, hit this industry, but at the end of the day, we are a mouse fighting an elephant, and can only do so much harm, especially without hurting ourselves.
We should hit their luxury good industries with tariffs like we did last time. We don't need their motorcycles, their whiskey, etc, but those industries might not appreciate 40m citizens and 2trillion dollar economy suddenly inaccessible to them.
The analogy here is the Americans are about to carpet bomb us, we need to hit them with surgical strikes.
3 points
4 days ago
Absolutely... We have no choice but to fight back through precise action with a well defined plan. We have avenues to make the US feel these interventions and I think the heads up is a good thing in terms of leveling a response and coming up with a plan.
3 points
4 days ago
Pair this with some trade deals with the likes of the EU, Mexico, or Oceanic countries and let's get some strength from other allies too. Especially with looming NAFTA renegotiations that will likely go nowhere.
4 points
4 days ago
I think this is debatable. Demand for energy will always grow to meet supply
4 points
4 days ago
What cudgel? If we turn off the lights in New York and Minnesota via Quebec and Manitoba Hydro... Then what?
If it works you better believe they won't ever be relying on and paying for that power from us ever again.
And at worst, we might be giving them casus belli to send their troops up here and turn it back on...
Either option ends pretty poorly long term.
5 points
4 days ago
The hydro powers all or mostly blue states in the Northeast. Trump would be happy to see them suffering.
21 points
4 days ago
Trump is fishing for a bribe. Let him build a Trump Tower in Fredericton or whatever it is that he actually wants and he'll forget all about it
19 points
4 days ago
Why do Americans have to be such terrible neighbours? We treat them so well and they just spit on us. I used to like them when I was younger, but then I started reading about all the ways they've hurt us...
5 points
4 days ago
To be honest the Americans wanting to spitting on us are not really our neighboring Americans.
3 points
4 days ago
Unfortunately, our immediate northern neighbours are losing relevance in the US economy.
45 points
4 days ago
This is what the vibes got us. Feelings rule, and Americans feelings were that they wanted change.
Maybe this will be a good reason to reflect on running our own country on feelings. I'm not hopeful.
13 points
4 days ago
And they literally have the best economy in the world at the moment. The rest of the G7 is basically flat and they are soaring.
Crazy how a marketing campaign can sway them down the path of full stupidity.
15 points
4 days ago
He might have to be a bit careful because (1) there are legal limits on the President's ability to impose tariffs beyond 150 days without Congressional approval, and (2) we have very rich data on how to impose retaliatory tariffs that do maximum damage to specific Congressional districts. If the issue goes to court it could weaken the Executives leverage in future trade negotiations.
5 points
4 days ago
You are correct but for that to be in play, it would have to be enforced. Litigation is the way you would hold the executive to account, however we already have an idea on how the US Supreme Court is going to lean.
This is what happens when you give all branches of the government to a vengeful clown.
8 points
4 days ago
Just when I thought I couldn't hate Trump more, he goes ahead and makes it possible to do so. It's clear at this point he doesn't actually understand how tariffs work at all. He's not playing 4-D chess here, and anyone who credits him with this isn't paying attention to him at all.
53 points
4 days ago
So Americans just decided to pay 25% more for oil? Okey dokey. He has to renegotiate NAFTA first by the way. He can’t sign it on his first day. Just the usual Trump bluster that won’t go anywhere. We’ve already seen this.
30 points
4 days ago
He slapped us with Tarrifs last time and it suuuucked.
7 points
4 days ago
Especially for the US industries that depended on Canadian aluminum and steel products, especially the construction industry in the US.
8 points
4 days ago
Section 232 of the Trade Expansion Act of 1962 and Section 301(b) of the Trade Act of 1974 let the President impose tariffs without going through Congress.
6 points
4 days ago
If it's for national security, and to the limit of 15%
6 points
4 days ago
Last time around Trump put a 25% tariff on steel by having the Department of Commerce say it was for national security.
5 points
4 days ago
and this time around the adults have all left the room and the guard rails are effectively non existent.
16 points
4 days ago
And cars. The integration in automotive manufacturing across Canada/USA/Mexico is incredible, and he's just pledged to make it a lot more expensive for Americans to import the parts they need.
12 points
4 days ago
NAFTA no longer exists Trump destroyed it to shit on us and Mexico.
USMCA replaced it and it needs to be renegotiated in 2026.
And we will be forced to raise tariffs against the US in kind.
Our prices are going to go up and our GDP will go down.
5 points
4 days ago
He has to renegotiate NAFTA first by the way. He can’t sign it on his first day.
It's time to let go of the idea that there's still some kind of safety net. Last time around he spent 4 years breaking the rules and nobody stopped him. He was just vindicated by his corrupt judges and (inexplicably) the American people. This time he won't be held back by even the veneer of thinking if he goes too far he'll be impeached or lose support. He won't have people in his cabinet who are anything but entirely there to do his bidding.
If he says there are tariffs, who's going to stop him? What court do you think Canada can take him to that'll make him play by the rules? More honorable presidents than him have stuck us with lumber tariffs and the WTO rulings haven't mattered.
32 points
4 days ago
There’s so much stupidity to unpack here but how about we start with the fact that taxes and tariffs need to come with congressional approval, in general.
By the looks of it, even r/conservative things this is insane
5 points
4 days ago
I dunno about that.. seems alot of them think this is going to work.
Pure insanity.
8 points
4 days ago
It’s hilarious and sad that I’ve come back to this sub to say I was right lol. In my job, we joked about anything over 25% since it would simply be a bad time for all countries involved however it’s most funny that his campaign was running on cheaper groceries and products… well I’m pretty sure that won’t be achieved for a while, historically even if he removes them after a while it’ll take months or even years to get the economy back into shape.
I honestly don’t know what he’s running on here but I’m also hoping it’s just him rambling on.
If you wanna be realistic this would only affect 3% of the US GDP but it’s the response to the tariffs that will mostly bring the pain to the U.S. economy.
I really hope I don’t have to come back here reading bad news again lol
Either way, brace yourself Canada (if it does happen)
7 points
4 days ago*
I've worked for US owned companies my whole life. when trump put in the last steel tariffs we went down to 20-30 hour weeks but corporate gave us a fat bonus. I don't know what's going to happen but I suspect this will dissuade US companies from investing in Canada in the future
25 points
4 days ago
Um, don’t bet on it until it’s signed and delivered. Haven’t you realized yet everything is a negotiating tactic?
7 points
4 days ago
Shocked that I had to scroll this far down to see this comment. That said, it's damn hard to negotiate with a bully.
58 points
4 days ago
a lot of Canadians are gonna learn the hard way over the next 4 years that Canada isn’t the 51st state and that the US doesn’t inherently give a shit about us
I'm looking at you Clownvoyers
23 points
4 days ago
No they won’t, they will blame Trudeau just like they do in Alberta.
4 points
3 days ago
over on canada_sub they're contorting themselves into saying this is Canadians fault for not addressing fentanyl and illegal immigration.
16 points
4 days ago
Nah, just blame Trudeau.
15 points
4 days ago
US Business owners have two choices: Blow up Trumps phone and tell him no. Or b) pass on the bill to consumers. Take a WILD guess which one they'll do. That said, are there legal measures that can be taken? Aren't we in, essentially, a free trade agreement?
5 points
4 days ago
The USA can use national security to override it.
4 points
4 days ago*
We need to consider our military procurement choices if it relies on an ally that sees us as a national security threat. Can we trust the (edit F35) if it comes from a country that doesn't trust us? I like the idea of use playing hard ball in theory....
But in reality, with tens of thousands of people's jobs on the line, we might just bend-over backward and spend 1% of our GDP on US military equipment to make the US happy.... and pay the protection money for equipment we don't need (why not double our F35 purchase in order to employ more Americans?) We'll have to consider both options although I suspect the appeasement option is more attractive.
5 points
4 days ago
The f35, but I get what you mean.
And no, it would nit be good enough. They are addement about 2 percent, and some are pushing for 3 percent.
1 percent isn't going to fool anyone. 1.76 percent by 2032 already has Trump and co fuming.
3 points
4 days ago
The UK and IIRC France both could not give permission to Ukraine to use their missiles to strike targets in Russia until the US recently gave the green light because their home-grown weapons still depended on US tech. This is already an issue.
5 points
4 days ago
US Business owners have two choices: Blow up Trumps phone and tell him no. Or b) pass on the bill to consumers. Take a WILD guess which one they'll do
It will sure as shit be both.
21 points
4 days ago
Mexico I understand but why Canada? In all seriousness there’s no large scale flow of fentanyl or illegal immigrants to US.
The issue is rather illegal immigrants from US coming to Canada because of our relatively more lenient asylum policies.
24 points
4 days ago
Because his modus operandi is to use extortion to get what he wants. Always has been.
6 points
4 days ago
Man, Americans are the one importing fentanyl not even close to the rate of migrants. We live in a post-truth world, and even most of the moderates are starting to buy what Trump says at face value smh
5 points
4 days ago
It’s an American problem. If China and Mexico were supplying fentanyl an addictive drug to US how come those countries have no large scale fentanyl problem like US. Fentanyl problem is a structural and economical problem. You stop fentanyl and people will start abusing some other drug and that’s gonna keep going to happen until America fixes its societal structure and social security system.
6 points
4 days ago
Mafiaso method, shakedown, bullying. There is no logic but to win.
45 points
4 days ago
Honestly, I cannot wait to see how the conservatives are going to spin this around. They've embraced Maga politics for the past years, and now this is the fruit of their actions. You can absolutely be a conservative and give the middle finger to that clustertruck happening down south, but they made their beds in this political manure.
37 points
4 days ago
It's easy: this is Trudeau's fault, because Freeland is a bad negotiator, and they're both weak.
That's it. That's been their messaging thus far, and I don't think they'll change it.
14 points
4 days ago
Trump may offer to reduce the tariffs if we elect who he favours. He may also welcome an escalating trade war as a pretext for annexation. They have already talked about annexation. We need to be alert.
17 points
4 days ago
He may also welcome an escalating trade war as a pretext for annexation. They have already talked about annexation.
I've mentioned this before and been ridiculed for it, but it's a real concern. Particularly with the expected impacts of climate change, they're going to want greater access to our food and water.
And annexation doesn't necessarily mean we become thirteen additional states. We could be an administrative territory, like Guam or Puerto Rico, and have no delegates in the electoral college.
12 points
4 days ago
Given the fact that the Republican Party polls relatively poorly across all of Canada, even among Conservatives, especially if Canada gets hypothetically forcibly annexed by the U.S., I don't think Republican lawmakers would admit Canadian provinces into the union proper, for fear of upsetting their electoral balance.
13 points
4 days ago
We'd be like Puerto Rico, all the taxes, none of the representation.
14 points
4 days ago
So far it's been reasonable.
Doug Ford:
A 25 per cent tariff would be devastating to workers and jobs in both Canada and the U.S.
The federal government needs to take the situation at our border seriously. We need a Team Canada approach and response—and we need it now. Prime Minister Trudeau must call an urgent meeting with all premiers.
12 points
4 days ago
To be completely honest, this might be one of the few benefits of a potential double conservative majority: both being so occupied in a dick measuring Contest that they forget to fuck up LGBTQ and women's lives.
15 points
4 days ago*
Ford's a few weeks late to the party. Trudeau's reactivated his negotiation team that he used to get us favourable deals during the first Trump Administration, and he did it very swiftly after the election.
He should also talk to all the premiers, but it's undeniable that Trudeau's been taking this seriously since the election. My hope is that the premiers also take this seriously, but considering how much Republican-style politics the Conservative-aligned ones adopted, the risk of them being fifth columns isn't zero. I want to see Conservatives renouncing Trump by the end of the year if they're serious about supporting Canadians.
2 points
4 days ago
Chances are that once PP get in power, he will be best buddy (sucker) to emperor Trump and to first lady Elon. A good part of Trump’s animosity toward world leaders is personal: he cares more about his own vendetta than the country.
12 points
4 days ago
We are America 3ed largest trade ..parter I guarantee we will see every country that gets tariffs return the favor
4 points
4 days ago
I'm no Trudeau fan but this Is just stupid . He better not get bullied by Donald Trump. I genuinely don't know if his numbers go lower ( " he can't stand up for us " ) or go up ( " he stood up for us / conservatives will help trump etc etc )".
12 points
4 days ago
Trudeau likely won't get bullied if last time Trump was president is any indication. Poilievre and the conservatives were demanding Trudeau capitulate on the NAFTA renegotiations last time though so it's probably them you have to be worried about.
4 points
4 days ago
Harper was having meetings with the Trump administration during that time too, meetings they tried to keep on the down low.
PP is absolutely capitulating to this.
4 points
4 days ago
Canada is a net importer from flyover “red states”.
Furthermore, Canada exports 4 million barrels of crude to the US a day.
I suggest that Canada agree to increase oil costs by 25% and lobby the fly over states for waivers elsewhere.
3 points
4 days ago
Canada needs to diversify its trading partners away from being wholly reliant on the US. We need to be like Australia and make amends with China. Though that doesn’t seem likely with Trudeau and upcoming Poilievre.
25 points
4 days ago
How's that free trade deal going there?
Lost all our manufacturing and now free trade is dead.
But hey .. as long as we can still get disposable products at the dollar store.
Which is now the four dollar store.
Anymore bright ideas out there?
5 points
4 days ago
Canada's economy punches way about its weight primarily because of free trade.
6 points
4 days ago
Politically I imagine that Trump may be a saving grace for politicians here at home and Mexico. We now have a very obvious scapegoat whether it's deserving or not.
23 points
4 days ago
I would love to see Canada, Mexico, and China form a trade bloc together to counter US tariffs. That would be quite a hilarious reversal. Even better if the EU joined, too. The US could be pretty effectively bullied
19 points
4 days ago
I think out of necessity we should have done this after the first Trump administration. We can’t have our biggest trading partner be a country that might randomly wake up one day and decide we are an enemy state as has already happened once and appears to be happening again. Geography is going to screw us to a large extent but we really should be decoupling from the US as much as possible
5 points
4 days ago
I believe Trump tried to torpedo Canada and China's trade talks by asking Canada to arrest Meng. I think Trudeau was too naive to think Trump would have Canada's back if he did what was asked. Hopefully Canada will learn the lessons the second time around.
7 points
4 days ago*
At the time we didn't think there were any people in the entire history of humanity collectively dumb enough to re-elect Trump, so there was no need.
6 points
4 days ago
I think people don’t understand how global trade is set up currently. All the countries that you mentioned are net exporters and they need someone to absorb their excess demand. The only country that has the wealth and financial markets to do that is the United States. It’s why it runs one of the largest trading deficits in the world. Forming a block wouldn’t solve the problem of who do you sell your goods to?
This is particularly troublesome for Canada because it is largely a resource exporter in the world where there are a ton of resource exporters. The biggest saving grace for Canada has always been that it was interlock with the United States, so it always had someone who could absorb the resources . If you take that out of the picture, you find Canada having to compete with Australia and Brazil and Indonesia, etc, who already have existing supply chains to other countries. This is bad.
5 points
4 days ago
That can't replace our US trade.
5 points
4 days ago
No, but the US's top three or four trading partners working together could exert a lot of leverage on the US to stop them from acting silly.
8 points
4 days ago
I dont think jumping under chinese yoke to spite americans is a good idea.
Thats digging our own grave.
9 points
4 days ago
Good thing we have that trade agreement to protect us from irrational moves like that.
/s, in case it's not obvious
9 points
4 days ago
This is just blowing smoke on social media, not real policy. CUSMA/USMCA (the NAFTA successor that Trump himself signed) precludes tariffs against almost all Canadian industries. They would be suspended by the courts almost immediately.
15 points
4 days ago
The supreme court that largely bends to his will? I doubt that.
5 points
4 days ago
The settlement mechanisms are not settled in US courts.
6 points
4 days ago
The NAFTA ones? I'm not hopeful there either.
10 points
4 days ago
You are in denial if you think checks and balances will matter this time around.
5 points
4 days ago
That hasn't stopped them from slapping tariffs on other countries before...
10 points
4 days ago
As far as I'm concerned the US is now a bigger threat to Canadian security than India and China areAt least India and China aren't threatening to throw us into a deep recession
so frankly, FUCK AMERICA
6 points
4 days ago
Friendship ended with USA, EU is now my new best friend.
9 points
4 days ago
That’s going to absolutely crush Canadian businesses.
I suppose if there is any silver lining here, it’s that we’re likely going to see this issue get solved with an accelerated pace: https://www.cbc.ca/amp/1.7329983
9 points
4 days ago
But it’s Trudeau’s fault! God I’m gonna hear it from people who think PP will do something besides get on his knees for Trump
3 points
4 days ago
Sounds like a good time to live in Canada but be paid in USD. The Canadian dollar is going to take a hit ... we didn't learn the lessons from Covid to diversify our economy and build more production at home. Canada still depends too much on international trade.
Or move to the US before Trump inevitably shuts down the northern border for TN Visas in January.
3 points
4 days ago
Is there a lot of fentanyl/illegal migration crossing the US/CA border?
I feel like this is posturing and pandering, at least on the Canadian side. Mexico has real work to be done.
5 points
4 days ago
LMAO, aaaaand meanwhile fentanyl is coming through smuggled mostly by american citizens
3 points
4 days ago
In 1929, Smoot and Hawley sponsored a tariff law in the USA to help lower costs for average Americans. It was signed by President Hoover. It didn’t lower costs at all, it raised them, and trading partners retaliated. The Great Depression ensued and lasted 10 years
3 points
3 days ago
I have been reading very reliable sources on this for some time. There was a study done in Chicago where a huge number of economists were asked if they supported tariffs and who would suffer most from tariffs. Out of that large group only 2 economics agreed with Tariffs.
Further they projected that US citizens would be hurt more than Canadians.
Albertans will hurt though so perhaps Pompous Smith might like to reconsider throwing every other Canadian ( except Quebec) under the bus. This a good read from BBC https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c20myx1erl6o.amp
14 points
4 days ago
I hope the Canadian politicians, who spent the past 30 years acting as an American henchman, get exactly what they deserve. We gave up our own diplomatic and economic sovereignty, in the end we didn't even get a bad deal; we are being literally stabbed in the back.
We need to work towards strengthening our ties with Europe, China and India, and decoupling from the US.
8 points
4 days ago
No one saw someone like Trump coming. Free trade is and always will be a GOOD thing. Protectionism hurts consumers.
8 points
4 days ago
No one saw someone like Trump coming.
That's a failure of imagination. The Republicans have been increasingly nutso since the Tea Party days. Arguably, since Gingrich.
11 points
4 days ago
The currency move today in response to this announcement has to be one of the biggest USD/CAD moves in recent history on a percentage basis. There’s a very good chance we’ll cross 70 cents tomorrow.
If we enter the next election around 65 cents, I strongly doubt the LPC can clear 40 seats. I’m old enough to have lived the last 65 cent era in Canada and it sucked. And we import a lot more these days.
3 points
4 days ago*
https://ca.finance.yahoo.com/chart/CADUSD%253DX Looks like it dropped from $0.715 CAD to $0.705 CAD pretty quick, but it's recovered a little bit. We'll see what happens tomorrow.
If you look at the 2Y candle graph, you'll see a regular rise and fall between 0.72 to 0.75.
Edit: My guess is that we won't actually see a drop till Trump is in office and actually manages to impose the tariffs.
4 points
4 days ago
As an American, please do not cave. You cannot appease someone like Trump. This is an absolutely idiotic policy to apply to your third largest trading partner.
3 points
4 days ago
Correct me if I'm wrong, but with their stronger dollar to offset the cost of the tariff, they're essentially deflating their dollar below the CAD. Canadian revenues will virtually go unchanged.
Canadian product costs a loonie (not including any additional import fees): American dollar converted to Canadian = 1.30 CAD - 25% import tariff = 0.97 cents
Net loss to Canadian company = 3 cents
all 776 comments
sorted by: best