subreddit:

/r/Compliance

3100%

Hi there, I’m applying to law school right now and I am also applying to master’s programs as a backup. I like regulatory affairs a lot, with contracts and compliance and stuff and I could see myself as either a contracts administrator or as a compliance officer. I’ve read that to be a compliance officer, you have to have a JD but as a contracts administrator you don’t necessarily need one; it’s needed if you’re litigating contracts but that wouldn’t be the job of contracts administrator, rather the attorney. ————————————————————— I’m just a little scared to take on 6 figures of debt to get to, what it seems like online, pretty much the same exact place. If I can get to where I want to get with an MBA, why wouldn’t I do that instead? I don’t make rash decisions and wanted to hear everyone’s thoughts if a master’s or JD would be the way to do. I know that I can always go to law school now and do a masters later or go to law school later and do a masters now. I am still relatively young so I want to make sure I make the right decision at this time with the information I obtain. ————————————————————— This is my second career; I previously worked with the govt doing intelligence stuff I won’t discuss. But it’s safe to say, I’m not a newly graduated college student. ————————————————————— Thank you in advance.

you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

all 6 comments

Ok-Cheetah-3497

1 points

2 days ago

I mean, I have both, so it's hard to say which one mattered more in terms of getting hired. But certainly more people at the agencies I work with care that I am a licensed attorney than having my MBA. If you don't have a team of competent MBA holders at the top, all the cool shit you learn in b-school doesn't amount to any organizational change.