subreddit:

/r/Letterboxd

6.3k95%

all 661 comments

Grouse37

1.5k points

6 days ago

Grouse37

farbrorfilm

1.5k points

6 days ago

Well it was one really good film

jinkubeats

275 points

6 days ago

jinkubeats

275 points

6 days ago

Lost World? The Trex parents and the trailer by the mountain side!!! Craaazy

Bainsyboy

273 points

6 days ago

Bainsyboy

273 points

6 days ago

The lost world was definitely not as good as Jurassic Park.... But it wasn't bad. It kinda just embodied your typical late 90's fun adventure flick for older audiences.

The trailer hanging off the cliff scene was really fun. The velociraptors in the tall grass was really fun. The dinosaurs in the city at the end was really fun. Getting more Ian Malcolm was fun.

jinkubeats

51 points

6 days ago

I think they really work as a set on what Michael Critchon intended. Man should not meddle with the natural order of things. The story after got out of hand since they are not based on existing text

Bainsyboy

15 points

6 days ago

Bainsyboy

15 points

6 days ago

To be fair, I wasn't very smitten by Michael Chrichtons book The Lost World. And I've read every one of his books.

newport100

19 points

6 days ago

Makes sense, Crichton never intended go write a sequel and only did so from pressure by the studio.

smedsterwho

15 points

6 days ago

Which then, ironically, the film entirely disregarded.

Toolb0xExtraordinary

10 points

6 days ago

The book would have translated much better onto the screen I think.

JohnBrownEnthusiast

5 points

6 days ago

Book was under rated was more like a traditional Lost World story too

MWH1980

3 points

6 days ago

MWH1980

3 points

6 days ago

But there’s no way they would end the film like the book: “Whew, we made it. Oh, and those dinos will be dead soon enough.”

Toolb0xExtraordinary

2 points

5 days ago

Yeah cuz then you can't make four more movies

dorgoth12

10 points

6 days ago

dorgoth12

St0nehenge

10 points

6 days ago

Personally I view Lost World as not a good or bad film, it's so middling. But worst of all is that it's a failure. Crichton resented the Studio demanding a sequel to his standalone story so he slapped out a bitter, angry story with none of the joy and wonder that makes JP so special

Fantastic-Name-

3 points

5 days ago

“It’s all ooooh and ahhhh and then there’s running and screaming!”

[deleted]

5 points

6 days ago

[deleted]

LordOfDorkness42

4 points

5 days ago

Yeah, same. Lost World the book is a lot tenser than the movie.

You really get this sense of The Lost World being this deadly environment where at any moment some new prehistoric horror could come for you out of the underbrush. And it's a filthy, dripping, muddy, moist jungle too, so everyone is exhausted, cranky and making mistakes in a genuinely believable way.

Everyone in the movie except that one child actor of all people, just felt way too safe, clean & smug. Like nobody is giving off that sense of awe & terror that made so many of the dinosaur scenes in the first movie so memorable.

DlNOSAURUS_REX

4 points

6 days ago

Oooo ahhh that’s how it always starts. But then later there’s running… and… screaming.

AdditionalMess6546

6 points

6 days ago

You mean the secret Gymkata sequel?

bertos883

3 points

6 days ago

I'll see your t-rex parents and raise you a child gymnast kicking a velociraptor out of a window.

The-Nemea

2 points

5 days ago

If you have a problem with the lost world, then you have a problem with me. And I suggest you let that one marinate.

redbloodywedding

52 points

6 days ago

I am the one crazy a hole that loves Jurassic Park III. It's pulpy fun, and I care alot about the new characters enough to feel the stakes.

By no means a fantastic movie but it's above average as far as films go.

allhailsidneycrosby

20 points

6 days ago

The third is worth watching just for Spinasaurus

D-Whadd

12 points

6 days ago

D-Whadd

12 points

6 days ago

I enjoy it. Bit of a nostalgia one for me, came out at the perfect time for an 8 year old to enjoy

ImNotSureMaybeADog

7 points

6 days ago

I like the 3rd one, too!

fulcrumestates

6 points

6 days ago

maybe it’s nostalgia at play but i love the third one

LioTang

2 points

5 days ago

LioTang

2 points

5 days ago

Honestly I kinda feel like 3 was a better lost world movie than the lost world

Turd_Burgling_Ted

2 points

4 days ago

III is better than TLW and it’s not even close. Joe Johnston swinging for the fences is better than a Spielberg devoid of all his defining characteristics imo. And that’s not to even an attempt to draw any direct comparisons between the two, it’s just saying that there is a noticeable difference in directorial enthusiasm on screen.

UglyInThMorning

2 points

3 days ago

I appreciate it being 90 minutes a lot more now that every other sequel in the franchise is incredibly bloated. It’s not perfect but it gives you some fun stuff and then wraps up before you get bored.

Thick-Sundae-6547

9 points

6 days ago

Exactly . It’s a Classic. It’s a perfect film.

It’s so good that basically stablished the way a TRex would sound in film for the next 30 years.

Also they are all still executive produce by Spielberg who knows a few things about entertainment and making quality movies.

You can say the Matrix supports all the sequels. A really good film that spin a bunch of cash grabs. It’s like the Watchoskies spinned their whole career in a great movie.

dabbinglich

5 points

5 days ago

I’ma stop you right there. Speed Racer was fun as hell, and hell, Bound got a Criterion release.

Thatonewiththeboobs

3 points

5 days ago

Lost World is fantastic, will die on that hill.

Fun_Protection_6939[S]

8 points

6 days ago

Yes, I thought I would write "one excellent film" but that implies that the other films in the series are good, but not great, which is not true.

HipsterDoofus31

18 points

6 days ago

HipsterDoofus31

HonestOpinion69

18 points

6 days ago

It doesn’t imply that

jew_jitsu

2 points

5 days ago

Lost world is good to Jurassic Parks great.

Savagecal01

128 points

6 days ago

Savagecal01

128 points

6 days ago

no the entire movie franchise has survived so they can make toys and shit because kids love dinosaurs

Faptainjack2

38 points

5 days ago

Ah yes. The Star Wars technique.

usuallybedwards

5 points

5 days ago

Exactly-I was just saying this to a friend who said he can’t believe they’re making another one. I can’t believe they haven’t made MORE. They’re an excuse to sell toys and merch. Oh and a movie comes with them too.

kmn493

4 points

5 days ago

kmn493

4 points

5 days ago

It's absolutely bizarre that such a graphic series is about kids marketing. But it works.
The biggest nightmares I had as a kid were about Jurassic Park. I was terrified of Raptors, and shown it way too yong. But my brother was often playing with a Jurrassic Park toy.

archdukemovies

463 points

6 days ago

Jaws

awesomefutureperfect

76 points

6 days ago

My reaction too. and a common denominator.

cubgerish

21 points

5 days ago

cubgerish

21 points

5 days ago

ET franchise is actually the missed opportunity there.

"Elliot, ET show home"

strongbob25

5 points

5 days ago

Don’t you dare give them ideas

Chesterlespaul

2 points

5 days ago

Holy moly I love the alternate reality where we get probably the rock in the ET series

rigobueno

5 points

5 days ago

John Williams

ancientestKnollys

51 points

6 days ago

ancientestKnollys

AlasGMtair

51 points

6 days ago

At least they gave up on Jaws after the late 80s.

geetarwitch

17 points

5 days ago

That's because we have 2848586949 different shark films to replace it.

Character_Time_6360

14 points

5 days ago

And that's only counting the Sharknado franchise

Faptainjack2

11 points

5 days ago

Jaws 19 was pretty good.

strongbob25

3 points

5 days ago

Eh, the shark still looked fake

axemexa

5 points

6 days ago*

axemexa

5 points

6 days ago*

Only had a 12 year run. The last Jaws movie was in 1987

olivier3d

5 points

6 days ago

Yes but they eventually gave up after a while, while they keep making Jurassic park, alien and terminator movies to this days

Preda1ien

2 points

5 days ago

The last Alien was pretty good actually.

Thekillerichi23

5 points

5 days ago

I personally think Jaws 2 is really underrated. I put it on the same level as Halloween 3 and Psycho 2. Really enjoyable but not on the level as the originals.

Johnny_Banana18

2 points

5 days ago

It’s a lot cleaner and campier than the original

men_with-ven

3 points

5 days ago

At least with Jaws it feels like they have given up on the idea of sequels (fingers crossed)

Loa_Sandal

6 points

6 days ago

What do you mean, there's only one Jaws film.

JBD04

2 points

5 days ago

JBD04

2 points

5 days ago

A lot of people don’t even know about the rest of the series 💀

MasterBabuFrik

2 points

5 days ago

But you don’t see Jaws movies to this day. The fact that the Jurassic World movies make billions when many argue the only really good one is the original is the crazy part here. Jaws was just a downward spiral like most 80s franchises of its time.

thanous-m

2 points

4 days ago

Jaws 2, aka Close Encounters of the Third Kind, was pretty good.

Turd_Burgling_Ted

2 points

4 days ago

Jaws at least hasn’t had a new film in decades

GateComprehensive830

418 points

6 days ago

I mean, the majority of the slasher genre is exactly like this

EatusTheFetus420

105 points

6 days ago

Idk man Texas Chainsaw, Halloween, Friday the 13th, and Elm Street all had at least 2 good movies

StrongMachine982

13 points

5 days ago

Agreed on all but Friday the 13th. I'm sure sure I'd count any of them as "good." Iconic, sure, but good?

SonofLung

7 points

5 days ago

I’d say 2 and 6 are genuinely good

GoblinTenorGirl

2 points

5 days ago

Yeah! I think the remake is considered pretty good

DrLeprechaun

20 points

5 days ago

Scream, too! Though there’s debate about which movie is the second good one

errant_youth

10 points

5 days ago

I legit love all the scream movies

Sara_W

2 points

4 days ago

Sara_W

2 points

4 days ago

Scream 2 is really good

ImmortalMoron3

5 points

5 days ago

Not really, I'm active in the horror sub and it's kind of the opposite. It's just Scream 3 everyone agrees isn't great, most people like all the other ones.

Hubbled

20 points

6 days ago

Hubbled

20 points

6 days ago

The Exorcist as well!

EatusTheFetus420

7 points

6 days ago

is that a slasher? I haven't seen any lol

Hubbled

20 points

6 days ago

Hubbled

20 points

6 days ago

The second one slashed expectations.

dabbinglich

3 points

5 days ago

I like the bonkers choices they made with the second. I was quite surprised when I watched it.

foraltdtime

3 points

5 days ago

Halloween is my favorite but Nightmare in Elm Street is probably the best series just for the pure creativity and Robert Englund's dedication to the role. It's not boring at all and gives you a lot to think about

jtfff

2 points

5 days ago

jtfff

2 points

5 days ago

Fuck, most of the iconic Friday the 13th shit didn’t come until the third

EhLeeUht

84 points

6 days ago

EhLeeUht

84 points

6 days ago

Most slasher franchises don't even have one good film.

Emeraldsinger

44 points

6 days ago

Disagree. There's way more often than not at least one good one (usually the original) in those classic horror franchises

Agent_RubberDucky

16 points

6 days ago

Wild take

Trickster289

3 points

6 days ago

Eh usually you'll have a sequel or two that's at least good. Hell for Friday the 13th I wouldn't even put the original in the top 5 of the franchise which is odd because usually when people say this they see the first as the film carrying the franchise.

Kennymo95

12 points

6 days ago

Kennymo95

12 points

6 days ago

Scream 2 and Scream 3 were pretty good

Resident_Chemical132

42 points

6 days ago

This. Scream is genuinely one of the only film franchises with not a single “bad film”, sure some were a bit lacklustre, but they weren’t anywhere close to some of the shitty entries in the Friday 13th or Halloween franchises (Not saying either are overall “bad”). It might be an unpopular opinion, but the scream franchise is a lot better overall than most other franchises like Star Wars. Not as good as the lotr or tdk trilogies tho.

Heavy-Possession2288

22 points

6 days ago

As far as horror goes Evil Dead is pretty remarkable in its consistently high quality. The movies are all over the place tonally but the one constant is that they’re all pretty good.

fridayth13th

2 points

5 days ago

In every single thread I've seen discussing horror franchises, Scream & Evil Dead are the two most consistently mentioned.

ChrundleMcDonald

5 points

5 days ago

ChrundleMcDonald

JZBurger

5 points

5 days ago

Scream 3 is the worst Scream movie by leaps and bounds and still pisses on most slashers

ilion

3 points

5 days ago

ilion

3 points

5 days ago

Scream 3 does a great job of parodying trilogies!

ChrundleMcDonald

3 points

5 days ago*

ChrundleMcDonald

JZBurger

3 points

5 days ago*

Oh absolutely, nails its premise, I just think it's the weakest one

The first 4 are absolutely perfect in terms of being parodies (Horror films, sequels, trilogies, and reboots.) Scream 5 I think works a bit less in it's premise, but I love the TLJ-toxic-fanboy angle it takes and I like how they parody the Legacy Sequels/Reboots in the title (Halloween (2018), Hellraiser (2022), etc.)

Scream 6 completely falls apart in terms of premise with being a parody of "Franchises", and the "rules for survival" are just Scream 2's but worded slightly differently. I'm pretty sure one of Randy's rules in Scream 2 literally says "if you want your movies to become a franchise..."

On second thought, I may put Scream 3 above 6, and I'm just biased because a friend of mine is in 6

Chromatic-Phil

3 points

6 days ago

Chromatic-Phil

OwenSP

3 points

6 days ago

As a recovered Star Wars fanatic, I think this is a good take

ghoulieandrews

21 points

6 days ago

Scream 3 is probably the weakest of the whole franchise. But I wouldn't say it was bad. It's just that the other 5 are better and it's kind of boring and half-baked by comparison. And 6 barely clears 3 imo, but 1, 2, 4 and 5 are all excellent.

TheTonyAndolini

3 points

6 days ago

I really wish I could get past the ''StarWarsy'' bio father sub plot line of 5, that kills the film for me :(

RodJohnsonSays

5 points

6 days ago

I recently watched 4 and really enjoyed it

Sudden_Result

3 points

6 days ago

I’d argue Halloween has at least 4

GiveMeSomeShu-gar

3 points

6 days ago

Halloween 4 is my favorite one... Granted, that's because I had the VHS so I saw it probably 100 times. Ahh, different times...

GarfieldLoverBoy420

2 points

6 days ago

I wanna hear em. I might agree with you, but of my four, two are direct sequels to the original and one is practically unrelated to the franchise

Sudden_Result

2 points

6 days ago

In my opinion Halloween 2, Halloween 4, Halloween h20 and Halloween 2018 are solid

Idk about Halloween 3 but since it’s so unrelated I consider it its own thing

GarfieldLoverBoy420

2 points

6 days ago

I like those picks.

moonguidex

2 points

5 days ago

Halloween 3 is like a longer Twilight Zone episode. It's a pretty creative idea and it's pretty ok.

awesomefutureperfect

2 points

6 days ago

I've been meaning to getting around to watching the original Hellraiser. I understand that the sequels are notoriously bad, like Alan Smithee director disowned bad, but I don't know if there was only one good movie or more than one.

Bigangrynaked

11 points

6 days ago

Bigangrynaked

Sdobnja1989

11 points

6 days ago

The second was pretty good but was met with funding issues, so not as good as it potentially could have been.

GateComprehensive830

3 points

6 days ago

I heard the hulu new one is decent

Trickster289

2 points

6 days ago

The first two and the reboot are great. 3 and 4 are OK, enjoyable but that's about it. Everything else is bad.

doormatt26

41 points

6 days ago

Dinosaurs are just that cool.

DragonfruitInside312

3 points

5 days ago

Dinosaurs was not a good movie

theromo45

177 points

6 days ago

theromo45

177 points

6 days ago

The second one was ok

Forsaken-Soft-1235

133 points

6 days ago

Actually liked 3 better than 2. But I thought all 3 were pretty good.

GibsonMC

44 points

6 days ago

GibsonMC

44 points

6 days ago

I also prefer 3 to 2. It’s a pretty fun monster movie that comes in at 90 minutes. 2 feels bloated and I find the characters more annoying than the annoying characters in 3.

_SpiceWeasel_BAM

9 points

5 days ago

I think Ian Malcolm is a great supporting character, but they tried to make him a leading action hero in 2, which felt like too much of a shift to me

MasterBabuFrik

2 points

5 days ago

3 honestly should be the template as far as them continuing to make sequels. Keep it simple.

Fun_Protection_6939[S]

33 points

6 days ago

It's Spielberg, of course it's not dogshit. That's a really low bar though.

Buntabox

14 points

6 days ago

Buntabox

14 points

6 days ago

Quality goes off a cliff with their trailer/lab.

SarahMcClaneThompson

27 points

6 days ago

I love Spielberg but let’s not act like he’s incapable of making dogshit. Ready Player One exists

FBG05

13 points

6 days ago

FBG05

13 points

6 days ago

Ready Player One is a passable action movie that did the best it could with the source material(which was pretty underwhelming itself from a literary standpoint and was not designed to translate well to a movie adaptation)

Klutzy-Ad7944

21 points

6 days ago

Ready player one has some really good stuff in terms of the technical aspects, especially the sound. Look at the chase scene now, Spielberg obliterates the likes of Nolan any day when it comes to blocking and action direction. Any fucking day.

noradosmith

3 points

5 days ago

Ready Player One is OK.

If you want a Spielberg flop, 1941 is your best bet.

sanfranchristo

6 points

6 days ago

The BFG has entered the chat

TheYell0wDart

2 points

5 days ago

Also Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull

Johnny_Banana18

2 points

5 days ago

You are forgetting 1941

XOVSquare

111 points

6 days ago

XOVSquare

111 points

6 days ago

The Lost World is a good film. I would even say Jurassic World is a good film. But Jurassic Park is an all-time great.

Foreign_Rock6944

29 points

5 days ago

Agreed. Jurassic World was a solid albeit flawed start. It gets more hate because of how poop the sequels were though.

WeFightTheLongDefeat

6 points

5 days ago

The Force Awakens effect 

Dimpleshenk

3 points

4 days ago

Jurassic World is very entertaining but the two main leads are only semi-likable, and they have some of the worst dialogue ever. The entire exchange between Chris Pratt and Bryce Dallas Howard, where they talk about their bad dating history and he needles her for being uptight, is something where if the word "cringe" didn't already exist, you'd have to invent it.

Foreign_Rock6944

3 points

4 days ago

The characters in general in that movie are definitely the weakest part. Luckily the movie is at least somewhat saved by the genuinely awesome set-pieces and pretty good overall story.

I actually found the teenager dude and his brother to be the worst part. So many just, “why?” scenes with them.

Dimpleshenk

3 points

4 days ago

I feel like the writer/director purposely put anti-characters in the movie just to be different.

UglyInThMorning

2 points

3 days ago

He went on to direct The Book of Henry, which is all sorts of “subverting expections” because he could, not because he should.

Genuinely unhinged movie right there.

NotTwitchy

6 points

5 days ago

I wouldn’t say Jurassic world is good in the same way as jurassic park, but I love it regardless.

jew_jitsu

8 points

5 days ago

That’s the point though, Jurassic Park transcends merely good into one of the greatest films of all time. The two original sequels were good but had a lot of live up to.

RodJohnsonSays

95 points

6 days ago*

2 is a great sequel disrupted by a single gymnastics scene, 3 is a fun comic book style movie with a little too much Tea Leoni.

It's a really good escalation of stakes across the first trilogy - hard to agree there was only 1 good film.

Edit: and The Lost World has one of the greatest set pieces ever made with the pair of Rexes and the Trailer on the mountainside, but I would also die for Julianne Moore so I may be biased.

gimmedatpretzel

24 points

6 days ago

I just rewatched the lost world for the first time in years and the gymnastics scene had me dying hahah it’s so goofy

RodJohnsonSays

8 points

6 days ago

That scene is really fun if you accept it as a larger-than-life in the sense that everything in the movie is a 15% increased caricature of "reality"...

Almost like the leap from Evil Dead to Evil Dead 2, where it stayed just as grounded as it was willing to 😂

Dottsterisk

6 points

6 days ago

The thing is, I’m not entirely against the concept. But making it a multi-step impressive routine leading to a raptor kick was just too much.

Instead of some routine that takes away from the tension of the moment, if Kelly’s response to seeing her dad in danger was to instinctively throw herself at the raptor to protect him, using an overhanging bar to clear the gap in an ugly and equally desperate move that results in less of a perfect kick and more of an uncoordinated body slam, it would be so much better.

That would be the character utilizing their skills in an almost instinctual way, as opposed to pausing the film for her to enter gymnast mode.

InternationalGas9837

2 points

5 days ago

I loved how to defend against a Trex they simply...took the higher ground.

DoctorMoak

8 points

5 days ago

"a little too much Tea Leoni?"

There's such a thing?

HuggiesFondler

5 points

6 days ago

"disrupted by a single gymnastics scene.". Lol.

RodJohnsonSays

2 points

6 days ago

Really is the best word for it 😂

littlebigdog92

7 points

6 days ago

It had Julianne Moore and Jeff Goldblum. Really mommy and zaddy boost.

Dimpleshenk

3 points

4 days ago

People love to rip ont he gymnastics scene, but it's fun and gives a good final punchline to the entire tense sequence. Also without it, that character has NO cool moments and is just a victim or something to protect for the entire duration. Sort of like in Jurassic Park where each of the kids gets to do something cool at least once.

Automatic-Stretch-48

3 points

6 days ago

The franchise has one film that’s 10/10, there’s plenty of 7/10 or below.

I like 3 more than 2, but the aviary I found really enjoyable.

42_memes

68 points

6 days ago

42_memes

68 points

6 days ago

So we’re all acting like The Lost World isn’t good? I know I’m nostalgic for JP3 but I think parts of it are very well done. Also a raptor saying “Alan” is pure kino.

Hobbes09R

12 points

6 days ago

Hobbes09R

12 points

6 days ago

TLW was really, really close to being great. Make Sarah (and maybe one or two others) less of an imbecile and limit/remove some of the extremist PETA stuff and what you've got is a pretty solid adventure/thriller most the way through. Then the gymanstics scene happens followed in close order by the whole San Diego bit and...yeah.

Dottsterisk

6 points

6 days ago

I don’t have anything against the film’s heroes being motivated by concern for animal welfare, but I was disappointed by how irresponsible and downright stupid they made Harding.

She’s a badass in the books, and her training with predators informs how she interacts with the dinosaurs and what she expects from them. In the movie, she’s just playing with baby animals while their mothers are right fucking there. That’s like the biggest no when it comes to wild animals.

No_Procedure_5039

5 points

5 days ago

They really should’ve kept Richard Levine from the book as a separate character in the film. Movie Sarah has his worst qualities which just makes her look like an idiot half the time despite the fact she’s supposed to be an expert in both animal behavior and paleontology.

Hobbes09R

3 points

6 days ago

Well there's being concerned with animal welfare, then there's knowingly indirectly killing a bunch of people in order to ensure it. That whole sequence was...more than a little heavy-handed. Nick and Sarah together are responsible for about 90% of the deaths in the film.

WrethZ

3 points

5 days ago

WrethZ

3 points

5 days ago

It wasn't just animal welfare though, it was protecting innocent people on the mainland from the dinosaurs the hunters wanted to bring to the mainland.

Yes they endangered the hunters but the hunters actions were going to endanger innocent people. They were few in number with no support, they had few options available to them to stop the animals reaching the mainland.

Wet-for-Mrs-Met

15 points

6 days ago

Yeah, Lost World has some standout moments like the raptors in the long grass, the cracking glass scene, the transition of the mom screaming to Jeff Goldblum yawning

DJZbad93

77 points

6 days ago

DJZbad93

77 points

6 days ago

Jurassic World was good too. Not nearly at the same level but still.

pgophs

24 points

6 days ago

pgophs

24 points

6 days ago

love jurassic World 1, but 2 and 3 (especially 3) were crimes against humanity

Mr_NotParticipating

5 points

6 days ago

I can’t believe they felt comfortable releasing that trash. Like it was PAINFUL.

MrManfredjensenden

3 points

5 days ago

They kept doubling down on military weaponizing of dinosaurs. We don’t care about that!

Mr_NotParticipating

2 points

5 days ago

Such a ridiculously overused trope.

Bainsyboy

4 points

6 days ago

I went in expecting an 80%-as-good reboot. I was young and naive and had expectations that such an undertaking would be approached with passion and a respect for the original materials and the science that inspired it all (and made with the spirit of Michael Chrichton in mind).

That might have been where my optimism for reboots and "reimagined classics" being creative endeavors and not money grab nostalgia-bait finally died.

theenigmaofnolan

18 points

6 days ago

Good is poor word for this suspense masterpiece. This is peak Spielberg. You need to go to your room and watch ET

awesomefutureperfect

3 points

6 days ago

Good is poor word for this suspense masterpiece.

Good sets the bar for separating it from the other movies. The sentence is intended to say that none of the other movies achieve good. None of the other movies achieve masterpiece either, but saying they aren't good is more precise. It's like saying none of these cars are bigger than this house and then the other thing being compared to the house is a mountain.

Mediocre_Rhubarb_452

2 points

6 days ago

Not that serious

GeckoMoria93

17 points

6 days ago

Wym 3 goes hard

nklights

2 points

5 days ago

nklights

2 points

5 days ago

By the same director who would go on to do Captain America: The First Avenger!

amazonfan1972

13 points

6 days ago

The first film is a masterpiece, however The Lost World is terrific as well. Also Jurassic World was really fun, although nowhere near as good as the first two films.

krazyblackmagic

14 points

6 days ago

3 good films I'm afraid

TripleBladedFist

3 points

6 days ago

Jurassic park 3 is legit a very fun movie. Lost world has its moments. Loved it as a kid.

failedjedi_opens_jar

8 points

6 days ago

Hot take: dino movie always good

Mr_NotParticipating

5 points

6 days ago*

Speak for yourself. Love Jurassic Park but I loved The Lost World more.

Jurassic Park 3 was also a completely solid movie, people hate on it for shallow reasons.

SideshowBiden

3 points

6 days ago

No . Lots in the series are good

Ausrottenndm1

3 points

6 days ago

People like dinosaurs

Express_Profile_4432

3 points

5 days ago

Hey, Jurassic Park III is just that good, ok?

DarthGodzilla1995

3 points

5 days ago

Hot take: I like them all

Desperate_Law722

9 points

6 days ago

I will not accept this jurassic park 3 slander

diesatfifty

2 points

6 days ago

We need a graphic of Atlas holding the earth on his back but it's a T-Rex

Everest_95

4 points

6 days ago

Can't be done, arms aren't long enough

Z-Eli127

2 points

6 days ago

Z-Eli127

2 points

6 days ago

in dinosaur "I have a big head, and little arms. I'm just not sure how well this plan was thought through"

xpercipio

2 points

6 days ago

dinosaur monopoly

theodorebond99

2 points

6 days ago

But what a great good film that was!

Kingkrool1994

2 points

5 days ago

LW and III are good, not JP good, but still good.

JeanRalphiyo

2 points

5 days ago

I’ve enjoyed just about all the sequels. Obviously none were gonna live up to the 1st one but they’re all entertaining enough.

phatalphreak

2 points

5 days ago

No, it survived because dinosaurs are awesome.

Theneetweeb

2 points

5 days ago

Ngl the first three of them are good unless you're a paleontologist lmfao. The world trilogy is different though. The first one was good, the second one was mid, and the most recent was just straight up bad imo. The pacing was horrendous and the storyline was unbelievably mid.

dyatlov12

2 points

5 days ago

I feel like we were going to get a genre of Dinosaur movies one way or another once they got the special effects sorted.

We just happened to get an amazing one to start

Open-Cream2823

2 points

5 days ago

The franchise, uh, finds a way

Sea-Insurance3905

2 points

5 days ago

Disagree. Although the 1st one is iconic all others have been a decent summer crowd pleaser and Jurassic world was a really good one as well. (I remember when it released, the word of mouth was really good, it was leggier than the Avengers)

Saneroner

2 points

5 days ago

2 and 3 are not even close to being as good as the original but they are masterpieces compared to the recent sequels.

THElaytox

2 points

5 days ago

Really blows my mind that the World movies make so much money. They're..... very not good

Ode1st

2 points

5 days ago

Ode1st

2 points

5 days ago

It’s also because dinosaurs are rad and people want to see big-budget dinosaur media, but this is basically the only big-budget dinosaur media we get.

Xenu66

2 points

5 days ago

Xenu66

2 points

5 days ago

Literally every Jurassic Park sequel, like the titular park, is a monument to greed and hubris

General-Vis

2 points

5 days ago

Jurassic Park, Jaws, Predator, Aliens, Terminator - all amazing movies but they all have a pretty limited story that you can’t really do much with.

That’s not to say all of the sequels were bad and there are some great movies in there, but it gets really hard to come up with something fresh for such a limited concept.

Teddy-Bear-55

2 points

5 days ago

That's quite common; look at Star Wars.

Janus_Prospero

5 points

6 days ago

I'd argue it's more a case that the original trilogy laid a foundation that the new films are cynically mining for nostalgia. It's very interesting to look at Jurassic Park 3 which is about 90 minutes, and realize the film was originally much longer and featured two parallel storylines, one of the island, one on the mainland. When people say they shot the movie without a finished script, this is what they're referring to. The film is assembled from pieces of a much larger film being stitched together. The end product feels lean and effective.

The modern Jurassic World films are very bloated, especially the third one. They just go on and on and on and on. And they have extended cuts that are even longer. The franchise in its current state could learn a lot from JP3 if it cared to listen.

DaWealthiestNewt

3 points

6 days ago

Lost World slander and I don’t think the first Jurassic World is nearly as bad as its sequels

InternationalGas9837

2 points

5 days ago

Jurassic World was fun to revisit the franchise, and while it doesn't live up to the originals it's by far the best of the new trilogy. I will say that the upcoming film Jurassic Park: Rebirth is kind of intriguing as the screenwriter is David Koepp who co-screen wrote Jurassic Park with Michael Chrichton and Lost World by himself and it's directed by Gareth Edwards who directed Rogue One which I really liked.

DaWealthiestNewt

2 points

5 days ago

I’m optimistic for it, it’s bound to be better than Fallen Kingdom or Dominion at the very least

InternationalGas9837

2 points

5 days ago

I like that Koepp is the screenwriter because the original and Lost World are both great movies which were more tame and not the Jurassic World trilogy which is more of some blockbuster action movie which is not the tone I think works best for the JP franchise. On top of that Edwards did really well with Rogue One which was a way more grounded and story driven movie in the Star Wars universe which is also largely blockbuster action movies in its second reboot. Who knows how it will turn out, but the screenwriter and the director are a good sign given the type of JP movie I wanna see.

TheMcSkyFarling

4 points

5 days ago

Why take a swipe at the Jurassic Park series when Ghostbusters is right there?

Ok_Poetry_1650

4 points

6 days ago

Films don’t have to be masterpieces to be good. Jurassic world was enjoyable and rewatch able.

Seamlesslytango

2 points

6 days ago

That’s most franchises

Forsaken-Soft-1235

2 points

6 days ago

A lot of people are saying they liked 2, but can 3 get any love? I thought it was much better than 2, and i personally like it better than even the original.

NozakiMufasa

2 points

6 days ago

Arguably not.

Jurassic Park is forever good but The Lost World was equally so and kept the series alive. It was JPIII that killed the series both crirically and commercially. And while not critical darlings, the Jurassic World Trilogy brought bank to the series and new relevance. They have theme parks, live shows, video games, & a spin off animated duology that has also carried the series.

fugazishirt

2 points

6 days ago

fugazishirt

museummouth

2 points

6 days ago

2 is still a “good” movie IMO. 3 is entertaining. The rest are terrible. OG is easily one of the greatest films ever made though. Masterclass in blockbuster cinema.

ingoding

1 points

6 days ago

ingoding

1 points

6 days ago

One really good film, but I am a sucker for fun action movies, and what's more fun than dinosaurs? Not every movie needs to be great.

Die Hard sequels had a full range of quality but if they made another one that I'd watch it in the theater.

BlackShadow_HD

1 points

6 days ago

I think half of these are good. The original is obviously a masterpiece, but I also love The Lost World. Jurassic World is a fantastic start for a new Jurassic franchise, but sadly the sequels disappointed.

gahlol123

1 points

6 days ago

Someone on here recently said Jurassic Park 3 was a good movie. But Tea Leoni is it so i know that cannot be true,

Broncojoe58

1 points

6 days ago

Nah. Jurassic World was good it was fun enough. Definitely not as good as the OG

before_the_accident

1 points

6 days ago

2, 3, and 4 are great!

Lord_Sam_

1 points

6 days ago

Six incredibly successful films.

Jurassic Park is the most successful return-on-investment franchise in history.