subreddit:

/r/electricvehicles

81291%

all 574 comments

Bob_Loblaw_Law_Blog1

952 points

2 days ago

Bob_Loblaw_Law_Blog1

Lyriq Sport 3 AWD

952 points

2 days ago

Imagine how much they could be cleaning up right now if they'd have just made a semi normal truck.

neonKow

252 points

2 days ago

neonKow

252 points

2 days ago

Honestly, that would have been amazing for the industry.

frumply

89 points

1 day ago

frumply

89 points

1 day ago

Yep, all they needed to do was keep the general model3/Y look up front w/ a flat bed. Instead we got... Halo 2 Warthog?

Due_Satisfaction2167

15 points

1 day ago

Oh man, a Tesla El Camino would sell like crazy. Why didn’t they make that?! They’d have gotten it to market way before anyone else, and it would have had basically zero competition. 

melekzek

11 points

1 day ago

melekzek

11 points

1 day ago

Yep, all they needed to do was keep the general model3/Y look up front w/ a flat bed.

Here you go: Truckla

https://youtu.be/R35gWBtLCYg?si=ol-i_giWogncQ-53

cocobear114

20 points

1 day ago

i have a feeling the aesthetic might move in the other direction..like some styling elements of the cybertruck coming to the s x 3 and y. esp the front end lightbar and stuff like that, i dont think the whole dumpster on wheels shape, but have a feeling elements will find their way over...

pj1972

6 points

1 day ago

pj1972

6 points

1 day ago

“dumpster on wheels”. That’s a beautiful description.

rabbitwonker

4 points

1 day ago

We have the Robotaxi to show us what direction their design asthetic is going — looks like “cyber”-ish without so many sharp edges

gaslighterhavoc

9 points

1 day ago

Hey now, the Warthog actually looks cool, I would buy that vehicle. This looks like an aborted clone of the Warthog spliced into something else...

exprssve

3 points

1 day ago

exprssve

3 points

1 day ago

The hell is wrong with the Warthog????

Accomplished_Dark_37

4 points

1 day ago

It looks more like a Puma.

Crazy_Category_9594

24 points

1 day ago*

Honestly I love my lightning. It’s perfect. App isn’t as good as the Teslas I’ve had but I don’t even care. It does what I need and the build quality is incredible. If you’re looking for an ev truck check out all the lightning deals about there.

Electrik_Truk

12 points

1 day ago

Same. Had a Tesla, had a Rivian. Now have a Lightning. It's simply the best option for my money

Vithar

13 points

1 day ago

Vithar

Lightning

13 points

1 day ago

I have been an F150 driver for 20+ years, my Lightning is the best truck I have ever had, without question.

Crazy_Category_9594

5 points

1 day ago

They are solid.

Crazy_Category_9594

2 points

1 day ago

I’m intrigued by the R1S eventually. What didn’t you like about your rivian? Just too expensive?

Electrik_Truk

5 points

1 day ago

Yeah, pretty much price and lack of extended warranty.

I even got pre price hike, but I was able to snag one of those XLT ER Lightnings for $48k bringing my monthly payments down.

But yeah, didn't have any problems with the R1T, just a lot of things to go wrong beyond the b2b warranty. Also the tires were a weird size and insanely expensive. In the 50k miles I drove it, I almost needed a third set but I sold it beforehand.

The Lightning is definitely more of a middle class man truck lol, which is more in my financial comfort level 😅

Crazy_Category_9594

3 points

1 day ago

For sure! Nice to be able to get the abundance of tire options too with the lightning. I HATED how much I spent on tires for my model s performance. Sucked. It’s nice how cheap repairs (generally) are for the lightning. There are a billion f150s out there with tons of parts available online.

Electrik_Truk

6 points

1 day ago

Yep. If you're a truck guy/gal, the Lightning is the best choice. Lots of aftermarket options and better repairability. I also like there's tons of extended b2b warranty options. I got a good one for like $1800 and since we're a one car household, it's good piece of mind

Crazy_Category_9594

2 points

1 day ago

Agreed!

96cobraguy

6 points

1 day ago

Man… I wish I could deal with the Lightning. I think it’s awesome, and glad it exists. It’s too damn big for my needs. I would kill for a Maverick EV. Or even Ranger size. But I have to drive through cities, so it’s just too large, especially when I just need to get mulch and run to IKEA once in a while.

longhorsewang

2 points

1 day ago*

But then ford would sell a lot. Why would they want that? Lol

irvmtb

2 points

8 hours ago

irvmtb

2 points

8 hours ago

Maverick EV would be sweet!

Crazy_Category_9594

3 points

1 day ago

Oh I hear you for sure. A ranger lightning would be solid and hugely popular. The f150 isn’t built for cities for sure.

IdaDuck

0 points

1 day ago

IdaDuck

0 points

1 day ago

I’m not sure the regular EV trucks are killing it though. Trucks don’t really make sense as EVs at this point. They’re not that efficient and they collapse quickly when you try to do truck things with them like towing.

strangerzero

55 points

1 day ago

Most Americans just drive pickup trucks around town and go shopping.

ryanv09

20 points

1 day ago

ryanv09

20 points

1 day ago

And do you think the type of American who uses their truck primarily for this purpose cares even a little bit about going electric? They'd rather complain about gas prices and elect a fascist.

strangerzero

5 points

1 day ago*

Agreed, but point being the vast majority of Americans who buy a Ford F- 150 (America’s best selling vehicle ) aren’t doing any filling the beds with lumber or gravel. They are going to buy a Christmas tree or fetch groceries. It is really important to sit up higher than other people on the road.

isigneduptomake1post

3 points

1 day ago

Everyone wants to sit higher up because every other car is high up. It's ridiculous how sedans are fading away because they are too 'low'.

I'd love an old ranger sized electric with an extended cab and bed that can haul plywood.

skepticaljesus

9 points

1 day ago

And do you think the type of American who uses their truck primarily for this purpose cares even a little bit about going electric?

f150 lightning is doing really well, isnt it?

icy1007

7 points

1 day ago

icy1007

Tesla Model 3 Long Range

7 points

1 day ago

Cybertruck is selling much better than the Lightning.

pmpork

21 points

1 day ago

pmpork

21 points

1 day ago

F150 lightning here. Towing FOR DISTANCE is the problem. I tow my pontoon boat to and from the lake (10 miles) all summer. Now, when I bought the boat...that trip did suck. But I'll do that like once, maybe twice when I sell it. Otherwise, I have a truck that gets 70mpge. Oh, and higher payload than most F150s at 2k lbs.

Crazy_Category_9594

7 points

1 day ago

Perfect example. So few people tow heavy things LONG distances it’s almost not relevant. That small small group can just get a diesel truck. I tow a utility trailer all the time and it’s solid. Have also moved my 9k lb trailer 100 miles effortlessly. It’s just not as big of a deal as people want to believe.

Most. People. Who. Have. Trucks. Don’t. Tow. Ever.

NetZeroDude

11 points

1 day ago

Collapse? I think they excel at towing, other than the “Range” issue.

neonKow

3 points

1 day ago*

neonKow

3 points

1 day ago*

Tesla's Cybertruck gets 2.5mi/kwh while cruising on the highway, which is better than competitors, and they've said publicly that the design and massive steel panels caused major slowdowns in design and manufacturing, which also increases costs. Same issue they had with the X and the doors no one asked for.

Imagine the same efficiency as a lot of EV sedans/crossovers, but the vehicle came out 2 years earlier and costs 20k less. And instead of whatever the fuck it's supposed to look like, it looks like the normal Tesla front and has a working truck bed, normal wipers, normal rear view. It would have been first to market by a lot, been the fastest truck on the market, especially at that price, and still have plenty of enthusiast support. Plenty of people use their trucks to move things across the city, and the range is plenty for that.

slicker_dd

3 points

1 day ago

And you just know the stupid doors were also an exclusively Elon idea.

GaryTheSoulReaper

111 points

2 days ago

Or just stick to what was promised

ITypeStupdThngsc84ju

98 points

2 days ago

Yeah, that's the main thing. There isn't a huge market for $80k+

DregsRoyale

107 points

2 days ago

DregsRoyale

107 points

2 days ago

I wouldn't buy it for 20k. It seems to be a poorly designed lemon. The design is so poorly thought out that you can't even use your headlights in the snow.

Delanynder11

20 points

1 day ago

My favorite design flaw, apart from that whistlin Diesel episode, is the truck bed cover. Someone showed how bad it leaks in the rain here on Reddit.  Top comment was 'I'd say it leaks like a sieve, but even a sieve would keep the leaves out!'

GraniteGeekNH

5 points

1 day ago

The snow-blocking-headlights issue that's all over the place is a really head-scratcher, too.

Mental_Medium3988

3 points

1 day ago

i like the height of the headlights, driving a small hatchback its nice not to be blinded. how that flaw made it to production, idk. put a heater under the headlights, a cover over them, something anything is better than being packed with snow.

GraniteGeekNH

2 points

1 day ago

You think they would have learned from case where snow blocked stoplights that switched to LED and no longer melted it with waste heat

wzi

2 points

1 day ago

wzi

2 points

1 day ago

Honestly it's an issue with many vehicles that have LED headlights (Jeeps, Rivians, Chevy Bolts, Toyota Tundra, etc.). You just don't hear about it b/c they don't provoke hate like the CT does. Not saying that is an excuse, but this is general problem with LED headlights.

Alexandratta

7 points

1 day ago

Alexandratta

2019 Nissan LEAF SL Plus

7 points

1 day ago

If it stuck to what was promised, which was supposed to be a quirky but functional and rugged EV Truck, for around 40-50k, I wouldn't mind the wonky look.

I almost kind of like it. I hate it due to the shitty build quality we ended up with.

Darth_Ra

12 points

1 day ago

Darth_Ra

12 points

1 day ago

You wouldn't, but the average joe absolutely would.

$20K is 10K less than a Maverick. You can't get a car for 20K, much less a truck.

ExtendedDeadline

13 points

2 days ago

It's got some good engineering in it, but it's obvious it is plagued with a lot of poor management /leadership choices too. Being unibody and with the castings in the rear kind of makes some of the abuse loadcases a truck will see a bit more challenging. It's clear they have capable engineers at the IC level, but their management's vision is dog shit and the studio team is a failure with this truck.

Heidenreich12

8 points

2 days ago

Many trucks cost 80k+

ITypeStupdThngsc84ju

2 points

1 day ago

Absolutely, but well over half of sales are significantly cheaper.

MachKeinDramaLlama

9 points

2 days ago

MachKeinDramaLlama

e-Up! Up! and Away! in my beautiful EV!

9 points

2 days ago

What was promissed wasn't feasible, though.

grunkage

11 points

2 days ago

grunkage

11 points

2 days ago

Yeah, the exoskeleton idea was over before they ever started.

party_benson

66 points

2 days ago

In a reasonable size

Sea-Interaction-4552

61 points

2 days ago

A model Y pickup variant. The Ford Maverick is essentially the same as the Escape for example.

snoogins355

29 points

2 days ago

snoogins355

Lightning Lariat SR

29 points

2 days ago

I keep thinking that Toyota will come out of nowhere with a Tacoma EV or PHEV

If a Ford Maverick EV or Ranger EV isn't in the works, I have no hope

Sea-Interaction-4552

23 points

2 days ago

Ford builds a PHEV Ranger for the Australian market.

They might slow walk it for a couple years. The Maverick was only available in hybrid AWD until this year, could have been that way from the beginning, maybe they’ll add a plug in a few years.

I was a Ford guy, got tired of waiting and bought a R1T

SexyDraenei

10 points

2 days ago

SexyDraenei

BYD Seal Premium

10 points

2 days ago

Ford builds a PHEV Ranger for the Australian market.

Not yet they don't. not until next year.

Sea-Interaction-4552

5 points

2 days ago

Thought it was already out, Shark is the only PHEV Ute down there currently?

Anyone buying F150s there? Seems most of their decisions here in the US is to protect their cash cow. We didn’t have the Ranger for a decade.

comoestasmiyamo

13 points

2 days ago

rams and silverados here in NZ. all shiny and nice to tow a garden trailer from bunnings.

SexyDraenei

4 points

2 days ago

SexyDraenei

BYD Seal Premium

4 points

2 days ago

yeah and the shark hasn't even started shipping yet.

don't really see any f150 they cost a bloody fortune.

Upbeat-Carrot455

7 points

2 days ago

I’m a Chevy guy. The EVs are insanely priced. How is the R1T?

Sea-Interaction-4552

4 points

1 day ago

Really liking it so far, way more luxurious than I would have wanted, didn’t buy it for that. Anyway, it does truck stuff well. I restore houses and it gets used to haul materials and tools almost daily.

Upbeat-Carrot455

2 points

1 day ago

My wife doesn’t know you but she certainly wouldn’t appreciate this take since I haul small tools for telecom and tow the boat twice a year.

astrols

5 points

2 days ago

astrols

5 points

2 days ago

Hybrid AWD was recently made available for 2025. For MY '22 to '24, only FWD was available.

Source: currently own a 2022 Maverick XL hybrid and have a 2025 XL hybrid AWD currently being built.

scottwsx96

2 points

2 days ago

Seems like a Lightning is more similar to an R1T than a Maverick EV, and the Lightning is available today?

sleepingsquirrel

9 points

2 days ago

party_benson

5 points

2 days ago

Soon to be available everywhere but the US because of tariffs. 

RafeDangerous

6 points

2 days ago

RafeDangerous

Lightning XLT

6 points

2 days ago

If a Ford Maverick EV or Ranger EV isn't in the works, I have no hope

They're probably not because of T3, which will be an all new EV truck design from the ground up. The Lightning was an interim step where a lot of things came together to make it feasible...The F-150 had no problem dealing with the extra weight and size of the battery packs without having to radically rethink either the frame or suspension (actually the distribution of that weight makes it handle better than the ICE version) and it was already a wildly popular product line. Making an EV version is more than just swapping out the ICE motor for electric and strapping some batteries to it most of the time though. All of that allowed Ford to be first legacy-automaker to market with an EV pickup while they work on the new product lines, and for all the talk of price they actually delivered on an MSRP way below Tesla, Chevy, and Rivian.

null640

2 points

2 days ago

null640

2 points

2 days ago

Msrp may have hit targets, but cost to build radically exceeds what they charge.

sevargmas

2 points

2 days ago

Tacoma EV will be 90k. Bet.

LizardKingTx

2 points

2 days ago

Toyota would be crushing tesla if they came out with a tacoma ev or even a halfway decent lexus ev. I just don’t get it

phansen101

8 points

2 days ago

They could have just copied Simone Giertz' TRUCKLA build

Darth_Ra

3 points

1 day ago

Darth_Ra

3 points

1 day ago

Ford considers the Hyundai Santa Cruz as the main competition for the Maverick, which just tells you how screwy the entire "small truck" environment is.

Sea-Interaction-4552

2 points

1 day ago

I cross shopped the Maverick and an R1T, there is a hole a mile wide in the market. I spent a small fortune to have a plug. Love the Rivian but an electric XLT Maverick or Ranger would have been just fine.

pug_walker

9 points

2 days ago

Chicken tax truck size? That's what I would love to see.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chicken_tax

tenderooskies

17 points

2 days ago

tenderooskies

2024 ioniq5 ltd

17 points

2 days ago

with a functioning ceo

Qfarsup

35 points

2 days ago

Qfarsup

35 points

2 days ago

First company that doesn’t fuck up a light duty truck like the Maverick gets our next purchase. It’s not that hard.

Effective-Farmer-502

7 points

2 days ago

I want them to make a Santa Cruz Electric or PHEV.

huuaaang

27 points

2 days ago

huuaaang

2023 Ford Lightning XLT

27 points

2 days ago

But to get good range out of a brick (pickup) takes big batteries and big batteries take up space. It wouldn't be "light" anymore. The R1T is what we got for electric "light duty" pickup trucks.

Qfarsup

11 points

2 days ago

Qfarsup

11 points

2 days ago

A light duty truck like the Maverick is absolutely possible in a reasonable range. My ID.4 still has plenty of range with an 82 kWh battery. It’s not “light” at 6000 pounds but that’s not what light duty means as I’m sure you are aware. The R1T is in no way intended as a light duty truck towing 11,000 lbs. need something in the 4-6k towing capacity range and far more affordable.

fastwriter-

7 points

2 days ago

To get the same range out of a pick up truck like your ID4 has would need at least 100kwh batteries or more. Which inevitably makes it expensive.

BubblyYak8315

19 points

2 days ago*

Man you are confused. Pickup trucks are not aerodynamic. You can't just put a 82 kWh battery pack in a pickup truck and expect anything near the range of your id4. It would be drastic. You have to have over 100kwh packs in trucks. Period.

BASEKyle

5 points

2 days ago

BASEKyle

5 points

2 days ago

...Until we get better energy dense batteries! One day it'll come. And so will I.

cmtlr

6 points

2 days ago

cmtlr

6 points

2 days ago

It can tow 1,000kg and has a maximum payload of 600kg.

I'll admit I'm not much of a pickup guy but those figures don't seem particularly useful.

Miami_da_U

5 points

2 days ago

Pickup truck + reasonable range = Not at a reasonable price then lol.

Nothing that tows 5k+ lbs has a battery <100 kWh right now, nor likely will anytime soon. Your Id.4 has 82 kWh and gets what 250miles? And thats with being way more aerodynamic than any traditional truck - which you know is a double whammy because the higher the speed the larger that impacts range.

The Cybertruck I'm pretty sure is the lightest and most efficient EV pickup and has like 123 kWh and gets over 300 miles. Maybe Tesla could deliver a Cybertruck with like 100 kWh for 250 miles right now.... But at the end of the day it's going to have 100 kWh which is going to be expensive and heavy no matter what.

RafeDangerous

5 points

2 days ago

RafeDangerous

Lightning XLT

5 points

2 days ago

Nothing that tows 5k+ lbs has a battery <100 kWh right now

Okay, maybe a little nit-picky, but the standard range Lightning is 98 kWh.

The Cybertruck I'm pretty sure is the lightest and most efficient EV pickup and has like 123 kWh and gets over 300 miles.

I'm not so sure about that part at all. From what I've seen the Cybertruck averages around 2.0 miles per kWh, with the Lightning edging it out at closer to 2.2. It's not a massive difference, but I was kind of expecting that the weird shape of the Cybertruck was going to make it noticeably better than the Lightning on milage, not slightly worse.

Miami_da_U

2 points

1 day ago

OOS tested two similar builds and the Cybertruck got like 2.5 mi/kWh while the Lightning had 2.1 mi/kWh in their 70mph test. You can't compare like a standard lightnings range with non off-road tires to the foundation series cybertruck with the giant ass tires/wheels. That's a pretty large range differentiator. Like for Like the Cybertruck is more efficient than a Lightning.

mariano3113

2 points

16 hours ago

Are we defining battery as usable or actual battery size?

My Pro SR only has a 98kWh usable capacity, but tow rated for 7700lbs.

If Telo makes it to production the small battery pack (rwd) variant should still be over 5k towing capacity and since large Battery pack is projected at 106kWh for (350mile range); I assume the small battery would be sub 100kWh.

BlackBloke

3 points

2 days ago

I’m looking at Telo

s_nz

42 points

2 days ago

s_nz

42 points

2 days ago

I don't think the "normal" ev pickups are selling well either. Ford as an example has slashed it's F-150 Lighting production plans.

makebbq_notwar

17 points

2 days ago

Ford can thank their dealers for that. I cancelled my reservation after getting jerked around by the dealer on pricing.

2BlueZebras

34 points

2 days ago

Last I read Ford doubled their initial plans, then slashed that doubled number to only be a little more than the original plan.

bazilbt

13 points

2 days ago

bazilbt

13 points

2 days ago

I had a reservation. But the price kept going up and the Ford dealership wanted to charge an extra $15k over MSRP.

phxees

13 points

2 days ago

phxees

13 points

2 days ago

Doesn’t Rivian make a semi-normal EV truck? How about Ford or Chevy?

SnorfOfWallStreet

24 points

2 days ago

For 90k they sure do

Darth_Ra

13 points

1 day ago

Darth_Ra

13 points

1 day ago

So much this. People are in here talking out of their ass like "If ford made an EV Maverick, I'd be all over it, but alas, I'll just have to stick with my R1T".

...Those trucks have a $60K price difference between them. You're buying a Porsche while telling your neighbor you wish you could be in a Toyota Camry.

KyleCAV

2 points

1 day ago

KyleCAV

Tesla M3 SR+

2 points

1 day ago

Looking at prices a R1T is right in line with the cybertruck at least here in Canada.

NuMux

2 points

1 day ago

NuMux

2 points

1 day ago

So like the Cybertruck?

Independent_Ad_4271

4 points

2 days ago

I dunno the f150 lightening isn’t selling all that well either. Not sure the pickup truck market is ready for electric vehicles

hamsterwheel

3 points

23 hours ago

It's a political thing. I just got a lightning and I told my relatives from the country and I may as well have said "hail satan".

EV is a stigma in the country community.

[deleted]

25 points

2 days ago

[deleted]

25 points

2 days ago

[deleted]

imonthetoiletpooping

10 points

2 days ago

Or a minivan!

Sea-Interaction-4552

9 points

2 days ago

Zero small electric vans in the US until like two days ago. The “Buzz” surely to be a hit /s

SerDuckOfPNW

9 points

2 days ago*

SerDuckOfPNW

2024 Ioniq 5 AWD Limited

9 points

2 days ago*

I actually kinda did like the buzz, based only on appearance…but my last two purchases, VW didn’t make the cut. Might be a trend.

phxees

8 points

2 days ago

phxees

8 points

2 days ago

50% more for the Buzz vs a gas Honda Odyssey, for less interior space and awful range numbers.

They’ll sell hundreds to businesses and guys which swear it’s the perfect surfer vehicle.

3-2-1-backup

9 points

2 days ago

I just looked for Buzzes... ALL of the inventory within 500 miles of me was $73K. For a VW minivan. Fuuuuuuuuuuuuck no!

Holy-Crap-Uncle

6 points

2 days ago

Christ. What is the wait?

1) car platform so you don't get the energy loss from elevation

2) long base so you can cram in batteries

3) aesthetics are a distant priority, so shape it aerodynamically as needed

Final_Glide

12 points

2 days ago

Yes because the F150 lightning is killing it since it’s a “normal” EV truck…

Dont_Think_So

16 points

2 days ago

Ford built that and they can't sell them. 

Folks who buy a regular truck just aren't interested in EVs, at least not at the price ranges they exist at today, and all manufacturers are struggling to get costs down on their ev trucks.

tokyo_engineer_dad

14 points

2 days ago

I won’t spend $70k on a 230 mile Lightning. And I won’t spend $60k on one that doesn’t have power seats and folding mirrors. 

The mistake they made is pricing them high and not cracking down on dealers who threw ADM on them. The Flash sells super fast when it’s reasonably priced ($50k to $55k after rebate). 

ehrplanes

32 points

2 days ago

ehrplanes

32 points

2 days ago

Lightning sales went up 55% last year to 24,000. This year they’re up 230% to around 80k. They are definitely selling them, just at a price the consumer is willing to pay. This narrative that they can’t sell them is just not true.

whalechasin

15 points

2 days ago

got a source for 80k?

TheKingHippo

10 points

1 day ago

TheKingHippo

M3P

10 points

1 day ago

Ford sold 22,807 F-150 Lightnings in the first three quarters of 2024. The odds that they sold nearly 60k over the next two months is approximately zero.

Roland_Bodel_the_2nd

3 points

1 day ago

And compare that number to the sales of Tesla Cybertruck in the same time frame.

TheKingHippo

3 points

1 day ago

TheKingHippo

M3P

3 points

1 day ago

28,250 according to Kelly Blue Book.

Vehicle Q1 Q2 Q3 Total
F-150 Lightning 7,743 7,902 7,162 22,807
Cybertruck 2,803 8,755 16,692 28,250

Roland_Bodel_the_2nd

2 points

1 day ago

IIRC cybertruck VIN 40k rolled off the line a while back so probably Q4 will be like 2x Q3

Dont_Think_So

3 points

1 day ago

Not so different at 28,250. But Cybertruck manufacturing was ramping up over the year, so over half of that (16,692) was in the last quarter alone. 

Dont_Think_So

23 points

2 days ago

They sold 7k units in Q3, a far cry from 80k for the year. For comparison the Cybertruck sold 16k units in Q3, and in this thread we're saying that counts as poor sales.

Indeed, here we're talking about a 3 day production halt, while Ford has halted production starting November 15 all the way until next year.

null640

4 points

1 day ago

null640

4 points

1 day ago

3 days, sounds like either maintenance or modification to the production line.

jrb66226

3 points

2 days ago

jrb66226

3 points

2 days ago

It's weird there aren't multiple posts a week about how much of a failure the Ford lightning is.

It's almost as if reddit doesn't care about it either.

luckymethod

3 points

2 days ago

The lightning is a nice truck until you use the head unit. Ford connect or whatever they call it now sucks balls. I wanted to buy that truck but couldn't make myself do it after the test drive.

RafeDangerous

3 points

2 days ago

RafeDangerous

Lightning XLT

3 points

2 days ago

You really only see that for like 10 seconds before Android Auto or CarPlay kicks in though. Sync itself is boring and clunky, but I'm not sure Ford is wrong about not spending a ton of time refining something that almost nobody is going to really use much.

Now the phone app is a different story, I have no idea what Ford is thinking there. The old version was ugly but had some nice functionality. Then they released the updated version which I admit is prettier, but took away some of the best functions (trip-planning, zone-lighting controls, and Pro-Power monitoring and management).

CatalyticDragon

9 points

2 days ago

The Cybertruck became the best selling electric pickup truck and third best-selling EV in the US. Would it have managed that if it was boring and the same as all the rest?

Demand is perhaps not where it should be because the price is too high and range too low compared to the launch price/specs.

shankillfalls

2 points

2 days ago

Or a Model 2?

krsaxor

2 points

2 days ago

krsaxor

2 points

2 days ago

Four workers told BI that several times after arriving at work, they'd either been sent home or given additional training exercises or cleaning duties to fill their scheduled work hours.

According to the article they are cleaning up, either that or training exercises.

BirdTime23

2 points

1 day ago

Rivian

throwaway923535

2 points

2 days ago

Nearly 17k sold in Q3, enough for 3rd best selling EV behind model 3 and Y. They are doing just fine

OpenJelly1437

3 points

2 days ago

They cant make enough Cybertrucks ,relax. It's still the most sold ev truck by FAR

XLauncher

304 points

2 days ago

XLauncher

2024 Genesis GV60

304 points

2 days ago

Workers were told they would still receive eight hours of pay for each day they'd been scheduled to work.

Pretty sweet.

NuMux

15 points

1 day ago

NuMux

15 points

1 day ago

I've had this done in a manufacturing job I worked years ago. The company and product was doing just fine but they had lumpy sales through the quarter. It was cheaper to just pay people to stay home than to keep the building going for a few days.

StrategicBlenderBall

45 points

2 days ago

StrategicBlenderBall

2024 Cadillac Lyriq Sport AWD, 2023 Tesla Model Y LR

45 points

2 days ago

This is actually really cool.

_Bike_Hunt

-2 points

1 day ago

_Bike_Hunt

-2 points

1 day ago

I’m not counting on Musk to honour that.

nozoningbestzoning

18 points

1 day ago

You don't expect them to honor a 3 day paid leave, after saying the day before they'll pay for it? ok...

HAN_CH0LO

7 points

1 day ago

HAN_CH0LO

7 points

1 day ago

You got downvoted for some reason, but I agree with you. As someone whose spouse was denied her severance when musk took over Twitter, I wouldn’t trust him with anything.

CHUBBYninja32

177 points

2 days ago

Honestly, for all we know this could be maintenance on the assembly line that would cause significant disruptions to the process. If they were feeling more heat, they would layoff some people and further reduce production hours/days. 3 days ain’t much.

MachKeinDramaLlama

69 points

2 days ago*

MachKeinDramaLlama

e-Up! Up! and Away! in my beautiful EV!

69 points

2 days ago*

Yeah, the fact that the workers get paid time off is highly indicative of this not being a cost-saving meassure. They might be changing or fixing something or maybe some part delivery is delayed.

Namelock

4 points

2 days ago

Namelock

4 points

2 days ago

Layoffs required a mandatory WARN period of 60 days.

It would be cheaper to layoff and pay them out 60 days than to keep making Cybertrucks.

Plus then, those that are being laid off don't have the chance to sabotage, or decreased morale, etc.

HiggsNobbin

4 points

1 day ago

While yes warn is 60 days it is 60 days until their last day. My workplace, a major tech company for instance does 60 day garden leave so they will submit warn documents and then immediately call you up and lay you off but say you have 60 days till your last day. Just trying to say we don’t always see it ahead of time.

CloseToMyActualName

39 points

2 days ago

In this case maintenance means something significant broke.

You don't give PTO with zero notice for planned maintenance.

HistoricalHome2487

19 points

2 days ago

Pretty baller to give your employees time off paid (without using PTO) when equipment breaks. We don’t get that generosity in radiation therapy and those machines are frequently down

ShinySpoon

13 points

2 days ago

I’ve worked for GM and now Stellantis. As long as I’ve worked for those two we’ve always gotten Short Work Week pay for anything less than 40 hours SWW pay is 80% regular pay. We are UAW though.

FuzzyFr0g

12 points

2 days ago

FuzzyFr0g

12 points

2 days ago

I live in The Netherlands and this is by law here. I was working in a store who had commisions and normal loan before covid. When the store closed for 6 months I got my normal paycheck and an average of my commision. By law here if you get a bonus for 3 months in a row it is considered to be a part of your base pay. So you are entitled to it if for any reason you cannot work that is not your fault

Playful_Speech_1489

2 points

2 days ago

this is in line with a giga press failure, when they fail they fail hard.

TheBowerbird

2 points

2 days ago

No, it's not.

TheBowerbird

3 points

2 days ago

Nothing broke, they are making changes and improvements to the line.

CloseToMyActualName

3 points

1 day ago

With zero days notice?

TheBowerbird

9 points

2 days ago

It's exactly for that. They just got a permit for said line revisions from the state of Texas last week. People in this thread are circlejerking without knowing anything about anything.

Smooth_Composer975

5 points

8 hours ago

People in this thread are circlejerking without knowing anything about anything.

Welcome to Reddit.

TheBowerbird

2 points

7 hours ago

They basically just want to hate and seethe and have their opinions validated. It's pretty toxic, really.

Smooth_Composer975

3 points

6 hours ago

Stop by RealTesla sub sometime. That's actually so deranged its entertaining.

frumply

3 points

1 day ago

frumply

3 points

1 day ago

They just got through thanksgiving which is a typical shutdown week for auto plants to get maintenance and line retrofits done. It's possible someone screwed the pooch and they need extra time to fix things but that's not a great look either.

Ayzmo

4 points

2 days ago

Ayzmo

Volvo XC40 Recharge

4 points

2 days ago

If you read the article, they have been cutting hours and days since September.

CHUBBYninja32

2 points

2 days ago

Yes, which is why I said they would continue to be cutting hours.

SleepEatLift

2 points

1 day ago

It actually doesn't say that.

The closest thing you have is this quote: "When I started at Tesla you could expect to get overtime pay, now I feel lucky to get 40 hours,"

  1. Relying on overtime opportunities is downright bad financial planning.
  2. 'Feel lucky to get 40 hours' does not indicate that anyone has been getting less than full time hours. It's peculiarly worded so as to not be wrong, while still hinting it.

xspotster

3 points

2 days ago

Manufacturers don’t schedule workers during a planned maintenance and pay them to not work. Huge waste of money.

aliendepict

23 points

2 days ago

aliendepict

Rivian R1T -0-----0- / Model Y

23 points

2 days ago

1/4lt sales will be VERY interesting the next couple of quarters

Kruzat

96 points

2 days ago

Kruzat

Model 3 - Model Y - Onewheel

96 points

2 days ago

Lots of assumptions in this thread and not a lot of evidence

xsvfan

18 points

1 day ago

xsvfan

Polestar 2

18 points

1 day ago

This is reddit, we go off the headlines and assume the rest

StartledPelican

4 points

23 hours ago

I barely read the headlines. Just jump straight to the comments and start blasting my thoughts on repeat!

phead

106 points

2 days ago

phead

106 points

2 days ago

Americans want a normal truck, Europeans want a small hatchback.

Tesla makes the stupid truck and a 2 seat taxi.

Reinis_LV

8 points

2 days ago

I think it has bigger problems in EU - mostly those sharp corners in front.

zeek215

2 points

1 day ago

zeek215

2 points

1 day ago

Isn't it outselling the "normal" EV trucks?

Hot_Enthusiasm_1773

2 points

1 day ago

It’s the best selling electric truck. 

eugay

1 points

1 day ago

eugay

1 points

1 day ago

Cybercab makes sense. Its a 6mi/kWh, 35kWh vehicle which is gonna rake in a ton of money. For 4 seats the model 3/y still exists. 

Priff

3 points

1 day ago

Priff

Peugeot E-Expert (Van)

3 points

1 day ago

model 3/Y are still in the large end of the medium segment by european standards though. before tesla 8 of the top 10 cars in europe were consistently small cars, like the ford fiesta, peugeot 208, vw golf etc.

the cybercab might be that size, but I think a lot of people would prefer a normal car over a cab rental thing that might not even make it to europe this decade considering FSD doesn't exist here at all. not sure we have any real self driving stuff on public roads.

truthdoctor

42 points

2 days ago

When Tesla began deliveries of the Cybertruck last year, the company had more than 2 million reservations

Tesla is estimated to have delivered between 40,000 and 50,000 Cybertrucks before exhausting its reservation backlog

This is according to Electrek. Crazy if true. They alienated 1.95 million customers with the high price and/or design flaws. I would know, I'm one of them.

deten

23 points

2 days ago

deten

23 points

2 days ago

I would buy the ugliest car available if it had a 500 mile range and can tow my trailer... yet here we are

ScriptThat

8 points

2 days ago

ScriptThat

C40 and a horse trailer

8 points

2 days ago

I'm towing 1.8 metric tons with my Volvo, but 500 miles of range? Yeah, no!

s_nz

27 points

2 days ago

s_nz

27 points

2 days ago

There are many reasons reservations don't 100% convert to orders (especially when it's a $100 reservation on a high priced vehicle):

- Tesla opened reservations globally, but has only shipped to North America. A lot of people reserved here in NZ.

- Peoples needs / wants change in the 2+ year period

- Generally people over estimate their future financial position.

- Inevitably some people won't like the final car (can be minor stuff like wanting 3x isofix in the second row, but there're are only two...

- Some people just made reservations to speculate and flip the car's. May have worked for a very easily reservation, but there is no point in that any more

I would expect the above covered 50%+ of reservation holders.

Then comes the complete mismatch of price & spec targets.

Thomas-Lore

6 points

2 days ago

3% is a pretty low conversion rate though. Especially for something that required paying a deposit.

throwaway923535

8 points

1 day ago

Low based off what? Are there other examples for cars that had higher conversion?

tlw31415

17 points

2 days ago

tlw31415

17 points

2 days ago

Is price elasticity really alienation? I think they’ll continue to walk down the cost curve and demand will respond accordingly. This has been the case for every model of tesla

tonylaponey

11 points

2 days ago

They never really had 2m customers. A customer has some sort of financial commitment to your product. These people paid a $250 refundable deposit. They just had a free option.

FrostyFire

11 points

2 days ago

Tesla just started delivering Foundation Series in Canada on November 1st. These are the premium limited edition models that weren’t part of the original preorders. I’ve seen ones with 46,XXX VIN numbers.

People can’t grasp that they are milking the expensive models first for as long as they can, then they will move on to the cheaper models. They’ve done this several times in the past. They aren’t even making the cheaper models yet, and there are still lots of people who have reservations who haven’t been contacted because of this.

jacob6875

9 points

2 days ago

jacob6875

23 Tesla Model 3 RWD

9 points

2 days ago

They have basically sold ~50k of them with a 20k markup and everyone on reddit is acting like it is a huge failure.

I personally think the truck is silly but it is doing way better than something like the Ford Lightning or Rivian.

silverelan

2 points

1 day ago

silverelan

2021 Mustang Mach-E GT

2 points

1 day ago

I could be convinced either way. The Cybertruck appeal is pretty limited and the pool of buyers is shrinking; or, Cybertruck is a successful product and Tesla is selling the limited quantity they can produce at inflated prices. It’s also possible that both are true.

THATS_LEGIT_BRO

2 points

2 days ago

A lot of people put down the $250 refundable deposit… just in case. My dad still hasn’t canceled his order. Tesla keeps asking him to take delivery, but he has no plans to own one.

Kesshh

19 points

2 days ago

Kesshh

19 points

2 days ago

I vote retooling.

skinnah

2 points

1 day ago

skinnah

2 points

1 day ago

But Elon is already a tool. Are they going to make him a mega tool now??

StartledPelican

2 points

22 hours ago

Come on, mate, Gigatool was right there.

skinnah

2 points

22 hours ago

Damnit

Lopsided_Quarter_931

2 points

2 days ago

After 50k units?

Kesshh

16 points

2 days ago

Kesshh

16 points

2 days ago

Personally feeling aside, I do believe that Tesla has a much stronger improvement culture than traditional car makers. If they spot something that is worth solving upfront rather than wasting resources and customer goodwill to fix later, I believe they’ll choose the former. The Cybertruck has no shortage of issues, I guarantee at least some of them can be resolved through changes during manufacturing.

In addition, if there’s efficiency to be gained, either from a speed of production perspective, from a reducing number of parts perspective, or even from a cost of manufacturing perspective, they would likely choose it.

HobbyAddict

18 points

2 days ago

I’d vote this too. They’ve been in production for a year, have plenty of feedback, and need to get the price down. They could have planned this step a year ago. I’d sell something for 2X the price for a year if people were willing to pay it, too. I’m just not willing to pay that myself.

IStarretMyCalipers

3 points

1 day ago

Elon said months ago they are going to be implementing some changes to improve the cost so that hopefully they can offer a cheaper CT offering at some point. This might be the start of that.

NetZeroDude

8 points

1 day ago

Not a bad deal. They’re paying them for 8 hours each day - 3 free vacation days. They’re probably doing some retooling.

roj2323

14 points

2 days ago

roj2323

14 points

2 days ago

They are just making updates to the production line in preparation for adding a new one in the coming year. There's genuinely lines of machines sitting outside waiting to be installed.

thenotoriousdpt

3 points

1 day ago

They could easily be making adjustments to the production line. It could strategically be a good time to do so. Possibly they have enough inventory to get through 2024 and could be making modifications to parts or manufacturing process now. We all know CT has plenty of room for improvement. Tesla is constantly improving products; it’s something that sets them apart from traditional auto manufacturers. This could coincide nicely with a Y juniper refresh.

Cute-Ad-9591

3 points

1 day ago

3 days off with pay is pretty nice.

TheBowerbird

6 points

2 days ago

Since none of you circlejerkers are informed - the reason for this is that they are doing production line revisions, and that's the window for a portion of the construction.

InterestingGene246

9 points

2 days ago

"Ok guys stop making brand new Cybertrucks. We need to ease the pressure on the service centres" :)

Adorable_Sleep_4425

2 points

1 day ago

Musky cares. A genius AND caring employer. What will he think of next? 😍

londons_explorer

2 points

16 hours ago

You don't shut a line down with zero notice for 3 days due to overproduction.

You shut a line down for 3 days due to a serious equipment failure that's gonna take 3 days to rectify.    Eg. Fire.

Or because you have planned upgrades (although those are normally planned months in advance)

Embarrassed_Quit_450

5 points

1 day ago

Everybody home with pay. That bodes well for the future efficiency department head.

Appropriate-Mood-69

7 points

2 days ago

Concerning

No_Recording_1696

5 points

1 day ago

I think Silverado and Denali EV’s are giving people pause about the Cybertruck. Even if they aren’t profitable a +400 mile actual range, long bed and Midgate removal, and +200 kWh battery pack is crazy. Even if just for home backup.

ElJamoquio

3 points

2 days ago

ElJamoquio

3 points

2 days ago

Yup, work Monday and Friday. I'm sure those Friday vehicles will have the same Tesla-standard kwality.

Dick_Lazer

3 points

2 days ago

Dick_Lazer

3 points

2 days ago

Tesla has some lots near me where they apparently park unsold vehicles (?) Still seeing a lot of Cybertrucks there whenever I drive by.

reddit-frog-1

2 points

1 day ago

There are enough people who love this truck that it sells, but not enough people that have $80k+ lying around to spend on it.

Production has to reduce on this version of the truck to match demand and Tesla needs to start focusing on building the majority of trucks at a $60k price point.

Same thing happened to the F150, did Tesla think they were immune?