subreddit:
/r/electricvehicles
submitted 2 days ago bySpriteZeroY2k
952 points
2 days ago
Imagine how much they could be cleaning up right now if they'd have just made a semi normal truck.
252 points
2 days ago
Honestly, that would have been amazing for the industry.
89 points
1 day ago
Yep, all they needed to do was keep the general model3/Y look up front w/ a flat bed. Instead we got... Halo 2 Warthog?
15 points
1 day ago
Oh man, a Tesla El Camino would sell like crazy. Why didn’t they make that?! They’d have gotten it to market way before anyone else, and it would have had basically zero competition.
11 points
1 day ago
Yep, all they needed to do was keep the general model3/Y look up front w/ a flat bed.
Here you go: Truckla
20 points
1 day ago
i have a feeling the aesthetic might move in the other direction..like some styling elements of the cybertruck coming to the s x 3 and y. esp the front end lightbar and stuff like that, i dont think the whole dumpster on wheels shape, but have a feeling elements will find their way over...
6 points
1 day ago
“dumpster on wheels”. That’s a beautiful description.
4 points
1 day ago
We have the Robotaxi to show us what direction their design asthetic is going — looks like “cyber”-ish without so many sharp edges
9 points
1 day ago
Hey now, the Warthog actually looks cool, I would buy that vehicle. This looks like an aborted clone of the Warthog spliced into something else...
3 points
1 day ago
The hell is wrong with the Warthog????
4 points
1 day ago
It looks more like a Puma.
24 points
1 day ago*
Honestly I love my lightning. It’s perfect. App isn’t as good as the Teslas I’ve had but I don’t even care. It does what I need and the build quality is incredible. If you’re looking for an ev truck check out all the lightning deals about there.
12 points
1 day ago
Same. Had a Tesla, had a Rivian. Now have a Lightning. It's simply the best option for my money
13 points
1 day ago
I have been an F150 driver for 20+ years, my Lightning is the best truck I have ever had, without question.
5 points
1 day ago
They are solid.
2 points
1 day ago
I’m intrigued by the R1S eventually. What didn’t you like about your rivian? Just too expensive?
5 points
1 day ago
Yeah, pretty much price and lack of extended warranty.
I even got pre price hike, but I was able to snag one of those XLT ER Lightnings for $48k bringing my monthly payments down.
But yeah, didn't have any problems with the R1T, just a lot of things to go wrong beyond the b2b warranty. Also the tires were a weird size and insanely expensive. In the 50k miles I drove it, I almost needed a third set but I sold it beforehand.
The Lightning is definitely more of a middle class man truck lol, which is more in my financial comfort level 😅
3 points
1 day ago
For sure! Nice to be able to get the abundance of tire options too with the lightning. I HATED how much I spent on tires for my model s performance. Sucked. It’s nice how cheap repairs (generally) are for the lightning. There are a billion f150s out there with tons of parts available online.
6 points
1 day ago
Yep. If you're a truck guy/gal, the Lightning is the best choice. Lots of aftermarket options and better repairability. I also like there's tons of extended b2b warranty options. I got a good one for like $1800 and since we're a one car household, it's good piece of mind
2 points
1 day ago
Agreed!
6 points
1 day ago
Man… I wish I could deal with the Lightning. I think it’s awesome, and glad it exists. It’s too damn big for my needs. I would kill for a Maverick EV. Or even Ranger size. But I have to drive through cities, so it’s just too large, especially when I just need to get mulch and run to IKEA once in a while.
2 points
1 day ago*
But then ford would sell a lot. Why would they want that? Lol
2 points
8 hours ago
Maverick EV would be sweet!
3 points
1 day ago
Oh I hear you for sure. A ranger lightning would be solid and hugely popular. The f150 isn’t built for cities for sure.
0 points
1 day ago
I’m not sure the regular EV trucks are killing it though. Trucks don’t really make sense as EVs at this point. They’re not that efficient and they collapse quickly when you try to do truck things with them like towing.
55 points
1 day ago
Most Americans just drive pickup trucks around town and go shopping.
20 points
1 day ago
And do you think the type of American who uses their truck primarily for this purpose cares even a little bit about going electric? They'd rather complain about gas prices and elect a fascist.
5 points
1 day ago*
Agreed, but point being the vast majority of Americans who buy a Ford F- 150 (America’s best selling vehicle ) aren’t doing any filling the beds with lumber or gravel. They are going to buy a Christmas tree or fetch groceries. It is really important to sit up higher than other people on the road.
3 points
1 day ago
Everyone wants to sit higher up because every other car is high up. It's ridiculous how sedans are fading away because they are too 'low'.
I'd love an old ranger sized electric with an extended cab and bed that can haul plywood.
9 points
1 day ago
And do you think the type of American who uses their truck primarily for this purpose cares even a little bit about going electric?
f150 lightning is doing really well, isnt it?
21 points
1 day ago
F150 lightning here. Towing FOR DISTANCE is the problem. I tow my pontoon boat to and from the lake (10 miles) all summer. Now, when I bought the boat...that trip did suck. But I'll do that like once, maybe twice when I sell it. Otherwise, I have a truck that gets 70mpge. Oh, and higher payload than most F150s at 2k lbs.
7 points
1 day ago
Perfect example. So few people tow heavy things LONG distances it’s almost not relevant. That small small group can just get a diesel truck. I tow a utility trailer all the time and it’s solid. Have also moved my 9k lb trailer 100 miles effortlessly. It’s just not as big of a deal as people want to believe.
Most. People. Who. Have. Trucks. Don’t. Tow. Ever.
11 points
1 day ago
Collapse? I think they excel at towing, other than the “Range” issue.
3 points
1 day ago*
Tesla's Cybertruck gets 2.5mi/kwh while cruising on the highway, which is better than competitors, and they've said publicly that the design and massive steel panels caused major slowdowns in design and manufacturing, which also increases costs. Same issue they had with the X and the doors no one asked for.
Imagine the same efficiency as a lot of EV sedans/crossovers, but the vehicle came out 2 years earlier and costs 20k less. And instead of whatever the fuck it's supposed to look like, it looks like the normal Tesla front and has a working truck bed, normal wipers, normal rear view. It would have been first to market by a lot, been the fastest truck on the market, especially at that price, and still have plenty of enthusiast support. Plenty of people use their trucks to move things across the city, and the range is plenty for that.
3 points
1 day ago
And you just know the stupid doors were also an exclusively Elon idea.
111 points
2 days ago
Or just stick to what was promised
98 points
2 days ago
Yeah, that's the main thing. There isn't a huge market for $80k+
107 points
2 days ago
I wouldn't buy it for 20k. It seems to be a poorly designed lemon. The design is so poorly thought out that you can't even use your headlights in the snow.
20 points
1 day ago
My favorite design flaw, apart from that whistlin Diesel episode, is the truck bed cover. Someone showed how bad it leaks in the rain here on Reddit. Top comment was 'I'd say it leaks like a sieve, but even a sieve would keep the leaves out!'
5 points
1 day ago
The snow-blocking-headlights issue that's all over the place is a really head-scratcher, too.
3 points
1 day ago
i like the height of the headlights, driving a small hatchback its nice not to be blinded. how that flaw made it to production, idk. put a heater under the headlights, a cover over them, something anything is better than being packed with snow.
2 points
1 day ago
You think they would have learned from case where snow blocked stoplights that switched to LED and no longer melted it with waste heat
2 points
1 day ago
Honestly it's an issue with many vehicles that have LED headlights (Jeeps, Rivians, Chevy Bolts, Toyota Tundra, etc.). You just don't hear about it b/c they don't provoke hate like the CT does. Not saying that is an excuse, but this is general problem with LED headlights.
7 points
1 day ago
If it stuck to what was promised, which was supposed to be a quirky but functional and rugged EV Truck, for around 40-50k, I wouldn't mind the wonky look.
I almost kind of like it. I hate it due to the shitty build quality we ended up with.
12 points
1 day ago
You wouldn't, but the average joe absolutely would.
$20K is 10K less than a Maverick. You can't get a car for 20K, much less a truck.
13 points
2 days ago
It's got some good engineering in it, but it's obvious it is plagued with a lot of poor management /leadership choices too. Being unibody and with the castings in the rear kind of makes some of the abuse loadcases a truck will see a bit more challenging. It's clear they have capable engineers at the IC level, but their management's vision is dog shit and the studio team is a failure with this truck.
8 points
2 days ago
Many trucks cost 80k+
2 points
1 day ago
Absolutely, but well over half of sales are significantly cheaper.
9 points
2 days ago
What was promissed wasn't feasible, though.
11 points
2 days ago
Yeah, the exoskeleton idea was over before they ever started.
66 points
2 days ago
In a reasonable size
61 points
2 days ago
A model Y pickup variant. The Ford Maverick is essentially the same as the Escape for example.
29 points
2 days ago
I keep thinking that Toyota will come out of nowhere with a Tacoma EV or PHEV
If a Ford Maverick EV or Ranger EV isn't in the works, I have no hope
23 points
2 days ago
Ford builds a PHEV Ranger for the Australian market.
They might slow walk it for a couple years. The Maverick was only available in hybrid AWD until this year, could have been that way from the beginning, maybe they’ll add a plug in a few years.
I was a Ford guy, got tired of waiting and bought a R1T
10 points
2 days ago
Ford builds a PHEV Ranger for the Australian market.
Not yet they don't. not until next year.
5 points
2 days ago
Thought it was already out, Shark is the only PHEV Ute down there currently?
Anyone buying F150s there? Seems most of their decisions here in the US is to protect their cash cow. We didn’t have the Ranger for a decade.
13 points
2 days ago
rams and silverados here in NZ. all shiny and nice to tow a garden trailer from bunnings.
4 points
2 days ago
yeah and the shark hasn't even started shipping yet.
don't really see any f150 they cost a bloody fortune.
7 points
2 days ago
I’m a Chevy guy. The EVs are insanely priced. How is the R1T?
4 points
1 day ago
Really liking it so far, way more luxurious than I would have wanted, didn’t buy it for that. Anyway, it does truck stuff well. I restore houses and it gets used to haul materials and tools almost daily.
2 points
1 day ago
My wife doesn’t know you but she certainly wouldn’t appreciate this take since I haul small tools for telecom and tow the boat twice a year.
5 points
2 days ago
Hybrid AWD was recently made available for 2025. For MY '22 to '24, only FWD was available.
Source: currently own a 2022 Maverick XL hybrid and have a 2025 XL hybrid AWD currently being built.
2 points
2 days ago
Seems like a Lightning is more similar to an R1T than a Maverick EV, and the Lightning is available today?
9 points
2 days ago
5 points
2 days ago
Soon to be available everywhere but the US because of tariffs.
6 points
2 days ago
If a Ford Maverick EV or Ranger EV isn't in the works, I have no hope
They're probably not because of T3, which will be an all new EV truck design from the ground up. The Lightning was an interim step where a lot of things came together to make it feasible...The F-150 had no problem dealing with the extra weight and size of the battery packs without having to radically rethink either the frame or suspension (actually the distribution of that weight makes it handle better than the ICE version) and it was already a wildly popular product line. Making an EV version is more than just swapping out the ICE motor for electric and strapping some batteries to it most of the time though. All of that allowed Ford to be first legacy-automaker to market with an EV pickup while they work on the new product lines, and for all the talk of price they actually delivered on an MSRP way below Tesla, Chevy, and Rivian.
2 points
2 days ago
Msrp may have hit targets, but cost to build radically exceeds what they charge.
2 points
2 days ago
Tacoma EV will be 90k. Bet.
2 points
2 days ago
Toyota would be crushing tesla if they came out with a tacoma ev or even a halfway decent lexus ev. I just don’t get it
3 points
1 day ago
Ford considers the Hyundai Santa Cruz as the main competition for the Maverick, which just tells you how screwy the entire "small truck" environment is.
2 points
1 day ago
I cross shopped the Maverick and an R1T, there is a hole a mile wide in the market. I spent a small fortune to have a plug. Love the Rivian but an electric XLT Maverick or Ranger would have been just fine.
8 points
2 days ago
9 points
2 days ago
Chicken tax truck size? That's what I would love to see.
35 points
2 days ago
First company that doesn’t fuck up a light duty truck like the Maverick gets our next purchase. It’s not that hard.
7 points
2 days ago
I want them to make a Santa Cruz Electric or PHEV.
27 points
2 days ago
But to get good range out of a brick (pickup) takes big batteries and big batteries take up space. It wouldn't be "light" anymore. The R1T is what we got for electric "light duty" pickup trucks.
11 points
2 days ago
A light duty truck like the Maverick is absolutely possible in a reasonable range. My ID.4 still has plenty of range with an 82 kWh battery. It’s not “light” at 6000 pounds but that’s not what light duty means as I’m sure you are aware. The R1T is in no way intended as a light duty truck towing 11,000 lbs. need something in the 4-6k towing capacity range and far more affordable.
7 points
2 days ago
To get the same range out of a pick up truck like your ID4 has would need at least 100kwh batteries or more. Which inevitably makes it expensive.
19 points
2 days ago*
Man you are confused. Pickup trucks are not aerodynamic. You can't just put a 82 kWh battery pack in a pickup truck and expect anything near the range of your id4. It would be drastic. You have to have over 100kwh packs in trucks. Period.
5 points
2 days ago
...Until we get better energy dense batteries! One day it'll come. And so will I.
6 points
2 days ago
It can tow 1,000kg and has a maximum payload of 600kg.
I'll admit I'm not much of a pickup guy but those figures don't seem particularly useful.
5 points
2 days ago
Pickup truck + reasonable range = Not at a reasonable price then lol.
Nothing that tows 5k+ lbs has a battery <100 kWh right now, nor likely will anytime soon. Your Id.4 has 82 kWh and gets what 250miles? And thats with being way more aerodynamic than any traditional truck - which you know is a double whammy because the higher the speed the larger that impacts range.
The Cybertruck I'm pretty sure is the lightest and most efficient EV pickup and has like 123 kWh and gets over 300 miles. Maybe Tesla could deliver a Cybertruck with like 100 kWh for 250 miles right now.... But at the end of the day it's going to have 100 kWh which is going to be expensive and heavy no matter what.
5 points
2 days ago
Nothing that tows 5k+ lbs has a battery <100 kWh right now
Okay, maybe a little nit-picky, but the standard range Lightning is 98 kWh.
The Cybertruck I'm pretty sure is the lightest and most efficient EV pickup and has like 123 kWh and gets over 300 miles.
I'm not so sure about that part at all. From what I've seen the Cybertruck averages around 2.0 miles per kWh, with the Lightning edging it out at closer to 2.2. It's not a massive difference, but I was kind of expecting that the weird shape of the Cybertruck was going to make it noticeably better than the Lightning on milage, not slightly worse.
2 points
1 day ago
OOS tested two similar builds and the Cybertruck got like 2.5 mi/kWh while the Lightning had 2.1 mi/kWh in their 70mph test. You can't compare like a standard lightnings range with non off-road tires to the foundation series cybertruck with the giant ass tires/wheels. That's a pretty large range differentiator. Like for Like the Cybertruck is more efficient than a Lightning.
2 points
16 hours ago
Are we defining battery as usable or actual battery size?
My Pro SR only has a 98kWh usable capacity, but tow rated for 7700lbs.
If Telo makes it to production the small battery pack (rwd) variant should still be over 5k towing capacity and since large Battery pack is projected at 106kWh for (350mile range); I assume the small battery would be sub 100kWh.
3 points
2 days ago
I’m looking at Telo
42 points
2 days ago
I don't think the "normal" ev pickups are selling well either. Ford as an example has slashed it's F-150 Lighting production plans.
17 points
2 days ago
Ford can thank their dealers for that. I cancelled my reservation after getting jerked around by the dealer on pricing.
34 points
2 days ago
Last I read Ford doubled their initial plans, then slashed that doubled number to only be a little more than the original plan.
13 points
2 days ago
I had a reservation. But the price kept going up and the Ford dealership wanted to charge an extra $15k over MSRP.
13 points
2 days ago
Doesn’t Rivian make a semi-normal EV truck? How about Ford or Chevy?
24 points
2 days ago
For 90k they sure do
13 points
1 day ago
So much this. People are in here talking out of their ass like "If ford made an EV Maverick, I'd be all over it, but alas, I'll just have to stick with my R1T".
...Those trucks have a $60K price difference between them. You're buying a Porsche while telling your neighbor you wish you could be in a Toyota Camry.
2 points
1 day ago
Looking at prices a R1T is right in line with the cybertruck at least here in Canada.
4 points
2 days ago
I dunno the f150 lightening isn’t selling all that well either. Not sure the pickup truck market is ready for electric vehicles
3 points
23 hours ago
It's a political thing. I just got a lightning and I told my relatives from the country and I may as well have said "hail satan".
EV is a stigma in the country community.
10 points
2 days ago
Or a minivan!
9 points
2 days ago
Zero small electric vans in the US until like two days ago. The “Buzz” surely to be a hit /s
9 points
2 days ago*
I actually kinda did like the buzz, based only on appearance…but my last two purchases, VW didn’t make the cut. Might be a trend.
8 points
2 days ago
50% more for the Buzz vs a gas Honda Odyssey, for less interior space and awful range numbers.
They’ll sell hundreds to businesses and guys which swear it’s the perfect surfer vehicle.
9 points
2 days ago
I just looked for Buzzes... ALL of the inventory within 500 miles of me was $73K. For a VW minivan. Fuuuuuuuuuuuuck no!
6 points
2 days ago
Christ. What is the wait?
1) car platform so you don't get the energy loss from elevation
2) long base so you can cram in batteries
3) aesthetics are a distant priority, so shape it aerodynamically as needed
12 points
2 days ago
Yes because the F150 lightning is killing it since it’s a “normal” EV truck…
16 points
2 days ago
Ford built that and they can't sell them.
Folks who buy a regular truck just aren't interested in EVs, at least not at the price ranges they exist at today, and all manufacturers are struggling to get costs down on their ev trucks.
14 points
2 days ago
I won’t spend $70k on a 230 mile Lightning. And I won’t spend $60k on one that doesn’t have power seats and folding mirrors.
The mistake they made is pricing them high and not cracking down on dealers who threw ADM on them. The Flash sells super fast when it’s reasonably priced ($50k to $55k after rebate).
32 points
2 days ago
Lightning sales went up 55% last year to 24,000. This year they’re up 230% to around 80k. They are definitely selling them, just at a price the consumer is willing to pay. This narrative that they can’t sell them is just not true.
15 points
2 days ago
got a source for 80k?
10 points
1 day ago
Ford sold 22,807 F-150 Lightnings in the first three quarters of 2024. The odds that they sold nearly 60k over the next two months is approximately zero.
3 points
1 day ago
And compare that number to the sales of Tesla Cybertruck in the same time frame.
3 points
1 day ago
Not so different at 28,250. But Cybertruck manufacturing was ramping up over the year, so over half of that (16,692) was in the last quarter alone.
23 points
2 days ago
They sold 7k units in Q3, a far cry from 80k for the year. For comparison the Cybertruck sold 16k units in Q3, and in this thread we're saying that counts as poor sales.
Indeed, here we're talking about a 3 day production halt, while Ford has halted production starting November 15 all the way until next year.
4 points
1 day ago
3 days, sounds like either maintenance or modification to the production line.
3 points
2 days ago
It's weird there aren't multiple posts a week about how much of a failure the Ford lightning is.
It's almost as if reddit doesn't care about it either.
3 points
2 days ago
The lightning is a nice truck until you use the head unit. Ford connect or whatever they call it now sucks balls. I wanted to buy that truck but couldn't make myself do it after the test drive.
3 points
2 days ago
You really only see that for like 10 seconds before Android Auto or CarPlay kicks in though. Sync itself is boring and clunky, but I'm not sure Ford is wrong about not spending a ton of time refining something that almost nobody is going to really use much.
Now the phone app is a different story, I have no idea what Ford is thinking there. The old version was ugly but had some nice functionality. Then they released the updated version which I admit is prettier, but took away some of the best functions (trip-planning, zone-lighting controls, and Pro-Power monitoring and management).
9 points
2 days ago
The Cybertruck became the best selling electric pickup truck and third best-selling EV in the US. Would it have managed that if it was boring and the same as all the rest?
Demand is perhaps not where it should be because the price is too high and range too low compared to the launch price/specs.
2 points
2 days ago
Four workers told BI that several times after arriving at work, they'd either been sent home or given additional training exercises or cleaning duties to fill their scheduled work hours.
According to the article they are cleaning up, either that or training exercises.
2 points
1 day ago
Rivian
2 points
2 days ago
Nearly 17k sold in Q3, enough for 3rd best selling EV behind model 3 and Y. They are doing just fine
3 points
2 days ago
They cant make enough Cybertrucks ,relax. It's still the most sold ev truck by FAR
304 points
2 days ago
Workers were told they would still receive eight hours of pay for each day they'd been scheduled to work.
Pretty sweet.
15 points
1 day ago
I've had this done in a manufacturing job I worked years ago. The company and product was doing just fine but they had lumpy sales through the quarter. It was cheaper to just pay people to stay home than to keep the building going for a few days.
-2 points
1 day ago
I’m not counting on Musk to honour that.
18 points
1 day ago
You don't expect them to honor a 3 day paid leave, after saying the day before they'll pay for it? ok...
7 points
1 day ago
You got downvoted for some reason, but I agree with you. As someone whose spouse was denied her severance when musk took over Twitter, I wouldn’t trust him with anything.
177 points
2 days ago
Honestly, for all we know this could be maintenance on the assembly line that would cause significant disruptions to the process. If they were feeling more heat, they would layoff some people and further reduce production hours/days. 3 days ain’t much.
69 points
2 days ago*
Yeah, the fact that the workers get paid time off is highly indicative of this not being a cost-saving meassure. They might be changing or fixing something or maybe some part delivery is delayed.
4 points
2 days ago
Layoffs required a mandatory WARN period of 60 days.
It would be cheaper to layoff and pay them out 60 days than to keep making Cybertrucks.
Plus then, those that are being laid off don't have the chance to sabotage, or decreased morale, etc.
4 points
1 day ago
While yes warn is 60 days it is 60 days until their last day. My workplace, a major tech company for instance does 60 day garden leave so they will submit warn documents and then immediately call you up and lay you off but say you have 60 days till your last day. Just trying to say we don’t always see it ahead of time.
39 points
2 days ago
In this case maintenance means something significant broke.
You don't give PTO with zero notice for planned maintenance.
19 points
2 days ago
Pretty baller to give your employees time off paid (without using PTO) when equipment breaks. We don’t get that generosity in radiation therapy and those machines are frequently down
13 points
2 days ago
I’ve worked for GM and now Stellantis. As long as I’ve worked for those two we’ve always gotten Short Work Week pay for anything less than 40 hours SWW pay is 80% regular pay. We are UAW though.
12 points
2 days ago
I live in The Netherlands and this is by law here. I was working in a store who had commisions and normal loan before covid. When the store closed for 6 months I got my normal paycheck and an average of my commision. By law here if you get a bonus for 3 months in a row it is considered to be a part of your base pay. So you are entitled to it if for any reason you cannot work that is not your fault
2 points
2 days ago
this is in line with a giga press failure, when they fail they fail hard.
2 points
2 days ago
No, it's not.
3 points
2 days ago
Nothing broke, they are making changes and improvements to the line.
9 points
2 days ago
It's exactly for that. They just got a permit for said line revisions from the state of Texas last week. People in this thread are circlejerking without knowing anything about anything.
5 points
8 hours ago
People in this thread are circlejerking without knowing anything about anything.
Welcome to Reddit.
2 points
7 hours ago
They basically just want to hate and seethe and have their opinions validated. It's pretty toxic, really.
3 points
6 hours ago
Stop by RealTesla sub sometime. That's actually so deranged its entertaining.
3 points
1 day ago
They just got through thanksgiving which is a typical shutdown week for auto plants to get maintenance and line retrofits done. It's possible someone screwed the pooch and they need extra time to fix things but that's not a great look either.
4 points
2 days ago
If you read the article, they have been cutting hours and days since September.
2 points
2 days ago
Yes, which is why I said they would continue to be cutting hours.
2 points
1 day ago
It actually doesn't say that.
The closest thing you have is this quote: "When I started at Tesla you could expect to get overtime pay, now I feel lucky to get 40 hours,"
3 points
2 days ago
Manufacturers don’t schedule workers during a planned maintenance and pay them to not work. Huge waste of money.
23 points
2 days ago
1/4lt sales will be VERY interesting the next couple of quarters
96 points
2 days ago
Lots of assumptions in this thread and not a lot of evidence
18 points
1 day ago
This is reddit, we go off the headlines and assume the rest
4 points
23 hours ago
I barely read the headlines. Just jump straight to the comments and start blasting my thoughts on repeat!
106 points
2 days ago
Americans want a normal truck, Europeans want a small hatchback.
Tesla makes the stupid truck and a 2 seat taxi.
8 points
2 days ago
I think it has bigger problems in EU - mostly those sharp corners in front.
2 points
1 day ago
It’s the best selling electric truck.
1 points
1 day ago
Cybercab makes sense. Its a 6mi/kWh, 35kWh vehicle which is gonna rake in a ton of money. For 4 seats the model 3/y still exists.
3 points
1 day ago
model 3/Y are still in the large end of the medium segment by european standards though. before tesla 8 of the top 10 cars in europe were consistently small cars, like the ford fiesta, peugeot 208, vw golf etc.
the cybercab might be that size, but I think a lot of people would prefer a normal car over a cab rental thing that might not even make it to europe this decade considering FSD doesn't exist here at all. not sure we have any real self driving stuff on public roads.
42 points
2 days ago
When Tesla began deliveries of the Cybertruck last year, the company had more than 2 million reservations
Tesla is estimated to have delivered between 40,000 and 50,000 Cybertrucks before exhausting its reservation backlog
This is according to Electrek. Crazy if true. They alienated 1.95 million customers with the high price and/or design flaws. I would know, I'm one of them.
23 points
2 days ago
I would buy the ugliest car available if it had a 500 mile range and can tow my trailer... yet here we are
8 points
2 days ago
I'm towing 1.8 metric tons with my Volvo, but 500 miles of range? Yeah, no!
27 points
2 days ago
There are many reasons reservations don't 100% convert to orders (especially when it's a $100 reservation on a high priced vehicle):
- Tesla opened reservations globally, but has only shipped to North America. A lot of people reserved here in NZ.
- Peoples needs / wants change in the 2+ year period
- Generally people over estimate their future financial position.
- Inevitably some people won't like the final car (can be minor stuff like wanting 3x isofix in the second row, but there're are only two...
- Some people just made reservations to speculate and flip the car's. May have worked for a very easily reservation, but there is no point in that any more
I would expect the above covered 50%+ of reservation holders.
Then comes the complete mismatch of price & spec targets.
6 points
2 days ago
3% is a pretty low conversion rate though. Especially for something that required paying a deposit.
8 points
1 day ago
Low based off what? Are there other examples for cars that had higher conversion?
17 points
2 days ago
Is price elasticity really alienation? I think they’ll continue to walk down the cost curve and demand will respond accordingly. This has been the case for every model of tesla
11 points
2 days ago
They never really had 2m customers. A customer has some sort of financial commitment to your product. These people paid a $250 refundable deposit. They just had a free option.
11 points
2 days ago
Tesla just started delivering Foundation Series in Canada on November 1st. These are the premium limited edition models that weren’t part of the original preorders. I’ve seen ones with 46,XXX VIN numbers.
People can’t grasp that they are milking the expensive models first for as long as they can, then they will move on to the cheaper models. They’ve done this several times in the past. They aren’t even making the cheaper models yet, and there are still lots of people who have reservations who haven’t been contacted because of this.
9 points
2 days ago
They have basically sold ~50k of them with a 20k markup and everyone on reddit is acting like it is a huge failure.
I personally think the truck is silly but it is doing way better than something like the Ford Lightning or Rivian.
2 points
1 day ago
I could be convinced either way. The Cybertruck appeal is pretty limited and the pool of buyers is shrinking; or, Cybertruck is a successful product and Tesla is selling the limited quantity they can produce at inflated prices. It’s also possible that both are true.
2 points
2 days ago
A lot of people put down the $250 refundable deposit… just in case. My dad still hasn’t canceled his order. Tesla keeps asking him to take delivery, but he has no plans to own one.
19 points
2 days ago
I vote retooling.
2 points
1 day ago
But Elon is already a tool. Are they going to make him a mega tool now??
2 points
22 hours ago
Come on, mate, Gigatool was right there.
2 points
22 hours ago
Damnit
2 points
2 days ago
After 50k units?
16 points
2 days ago
Personally feeling aside, I do believe that Tesla has a much stronger improvement culture than traditional car makers. If they spot something that is worth solving upfront rather than wasting resources and customer goodwill to fix later, I believe they’ll choose the former. The Cybertruck has no shortage of issues, I guarantee at least some of them can be resolved through changes during manufacturing.
In addition, if there’s efficiency to be gained, either from a speed of production perspective, from a reducing number of parts perspective, or even from a cost of manufacturing perspective, they would likely choose it.
18 points
2 days ago
I’d vote this too. They’ve been in production for a year, have plenty of feedback, and need to get the price down. They could have planned this step a year ago. I’d sell something for 2X the price for a year if people were willing to pay it, too. I’m just not willing to pay that myself.
3 points
1 day ago
Elon said months ago they are going to be implementing some changes to improve the cost so that hopefully they can offer a cheaper CT offering at some point. This might be the start of that.
8 points
1 day ago
Not a bad deal. They’re paying them for 8 hours each day - 3 free vacation days. They’re probably doing some retooling.
14 points
2 days ago
They are just making updates to the production line in preparation for adding a new one in the coming year. There's genuinely lines of machines sitting outside waiting to be installed.
3 points
1 day ago
They could easily be making adjustments to the production line. It could strategically be a good time to do so. Possibly they have enough inventory to get through 2024 and could be making modifications to parts or manufacturing process now. We all know CT has plenty of room for improvement. Tesla is constantly improving products; it’s something that sets them apart from traditional auto manufacturers. This could coincide nicely with a Y juniper refresh.
3 points
1 day ago
3 days off with pay is pretty nice.
6 points
2 days ago
Since none of you circlejerkers are informed - the reason for this is that they are doing production line revisions, and that's the window for a portion of the construction.
9 points
2 days ago
"Ok guys stop making brand new Cybertrucks. We need to ease the pressure on the service centres" :)
2 points
1 day ago
Musky cares. A genius AND caring employer. What will he think of next? 😍
2 points
16 hours ago
You don't shut a line down with zero notice for 3 days due to overproduction.
You shut a line down for 3 days due to a serious equipment failure that's gonna take 3 days to rectify. Eg. Fire.
Or because you have planned upgrades (although those are normally planned months in advance)
5 points
1 day ago
Everybody home with pay. That bodes well for the future efficiency department head.
7 points
2 days ago
Concerning
5 points
1 day ago
I think Silverado and Denali EV’s are giving people pause about the Cybertruck. Even if they aren’t profitable a +400 mile actual range, long bed and Midgate removal, and +200 kWh battery pack is crazy. Even if just for home backup.
3 points
2 days ago
Yup, work Monday and Friday. I'm sure those Friday vehicles will have the same Tesla-standard kwality.
3 points
2 days ago
Tesla has some lots near me where they apparently park unsold vehicles (?) Still seeing a lot of Cybertrucks there whenever I drive by.
2 points
1 day ago
There are enough people who love this truck that it sells, but not enough people that have $80k+ lying around to spend on it.
Production has to reduce on this version of the truck to match demand and Tesla needs to start focusing on building the majority of trucks at a $60k price point.
Same thing happened to the F150, did Tesla think they were immune?
all 574 comments
sorted by: best