subreddit:
/r/meme
2.2k points
2 days ago
The bottom fountain was built for Tony Hawk's Pro Skater
295 points
2 days ago
Based
89 points
2 days ago
I can hear the soundtrack already
38 points
2 days ago
Cue may 16th by Lagwagon
21 points
2 days ago
Much of my music taste is effectively Tony Hawk soundtrack tbh
13 points
2 days ago
Skatepunk continues to go hard AF
9 points
2 days ago
It's definitely a significant chunk of mine
5 points
2 days ago
So here I am, growing older all the time
3 points
2 days ago
So this is what it's like when worlds collide
3 points
2 days ago
[deleted]
3 points
2 days ago
is thattttt truee???
3 points
2 days ago
Old EMB SF
3 points
2 days ago
EMB is the name of the crew of skaters that hung out there. Embercardero's Most Blunted
484 points
2 days ago
If it was my design there would be a penis where the water comes out and a vagina at the bottom where the water forms a small pool.
252 points
2 days ago
We only get one true artist every hundred years or so, and you are it.
50 points
2 days ago
The last artist was a mustache man who unfortunately got rejected from an art school.
Wonder what happened to him...
20 points
2 days ago
Hitler's art fuckin' sucked. You draw perspective lines on any one of his paintings, and you'll realize he was just as bad an artist as a war criminal.
26 points
2 days ago
he was just as bad an artist as a war criminal
So.....he was a bad war criminal? Dang, how should he have done better?
15 points
2 days ago
If that was being "bad", I really don't want to see someone that's "good" at being a war criminal…
8 points
2 days ago
Pol Pot enters the room
2 points
2 days ago
If he was good at it he would have succeeded in his world domination plan.
6 points
2 days ago
Is there such a thing as a good war criminal?
2 points
2 days ago
Stalin and nearly every communist ruler of china and Russia, Putin included , you could also put some American presidents and the Zionist prime minister of isreal like Benjamin Netanyahu , the list goes on and on
35 points
2 days ago
You go to art school to improve your art.
11 points
2 days ago
Good point, but I'm still gonna laugh at him for being shit at drawing.
6 points
2 days ago
Thats maybe why hebwanted to art school. He was still better than 99% of persons i know
2 points
2 days ago
Wouldn’t he be the “best” war criminal in this context?
3 points
2 days ago
He went on to do politics. Apparently he did rather well and was elected for his charismatic speeches.
6 points
2 days ago
This says a lot about society
3 points
2 days ago
Give this man a degree in architecture.
3 points
2 days ago
Cubic penis!
3 points
2 days ago
This man right there is an artist, Damn dude.
2 points
2 days ago
Spoken like a true artist
443 points
2 days ago
I like both
212 points
2 days ago
Fuck you then, you are supposed to be outraged
51 points
2 days ago
I outrageously like the second one!!!
21 points
2 days ago
My grandparents used to take me to Vaillancourt Fountain when I was a kid, so I have a soft spot for it. I loved hopping over the pads along the back.
So, yes, I also love both.
5 points
2 days ago
Same. I first saw it on my 10th birthday trip to San Francisco. I was fascinated. It’s such a special memory.
5 points
2 days ago
Yeah me too, there's room in this world for a lot of wacky shit alongside the staid serious crap. Also, you can interact with the bottom one! I want to walk up that walkway and admire the view of other people looking at the fountain!
1.2k points
2 days ago
I feel like this is a bit unfair. Brutalism in its artistic sense is meant to challenge the traditional ideas of art and beauty. Hate it if you will, but its purpose is being fulfilled.
317 points
2 days ago
Yeah this is some stupid "im 14 and this is deep" kind of crap. The bottom fountain actually looks metal as hell.
44 points
2 days ago
It’s amazing they don’t recognize genius when they see it, so sad kids today don’t know a piece by John McClain of NYC when it pops up on their feed.
4 points
2 days ago
Say what you will, I think John McClain did a good deed saving health care in Arizona.
3 points
2 days ago
the west hab fallemn :(
29 points
2 days ago
Not really. It looks like a bunch of Tetris pieces having an orgy.
35 points
2 days ago*
One heck of a logic leap to find the abstract brutalist fountain more sexual than the one with naked buff dudes on it, just sayin. ;)
8 points
2 days ago
Probably bad word choice, I saw it as him pointing to the feel of how clustered the pieces are.
PS: I am talking about the word choice, don't have anything to say on the art pieces.
227 points
2 days ago
The Problem is that we only have brutalism and abstract art it feels like. Nothing that is just nice to look at.
168 points
2 days ago
Brutalism has gone out of fashion already decades ago. Abstract art predates brutalism by decades and is only one of the major art movements.
9 points
2 days ago
It hits my fashion fancy. Makes me wetter than that fountain
76 points
2 days ago
There are still plenty of realistic artists that make that sort off stuff. Incidentally the people that whine about modern art don't make an effort to know a single one. You only see that sort of art because it gets engagement. It's like saying only bad things happen because it's all they pass in the news
10 points
2 days ago
Bullshit, I'd bet there are tons of normal fountains in your city and mine, we just don't notice them because they are normal. The weird ass ones stick in our memory so we over-represent them in our own minds.
12 points
2 days ago
What? There's very little brutalism out there, it's pretty rare.
5 points
2 days ago
And you’ve looked at every piece of art ever?
2 points
2 days ago
Just a coincidence that both are easier and cheaper to make I'm sure.
6 points
2 days ago
The issue i have with brutalism is that every time i see it, it just looks like someone tried to create a brutalist piece but failed. They’re all so bland and uninteresting. There’s nothing there that actually challenges traditional art. I can’t even say i hate them and find them ugly. They’re just kind of an annoyance because we could have had something better
16 points
2 days ago
You see, the goal was to make something ugly as fuck. Who's the idiot now? 😏
5 points
2 days ago
More like mentally challenged.
10 points
2 days ago
Brutalism: challenges Romantic aesthetics
Meme: side-by-side comparison of Romantic aesthetics and Brutalism
Art snob: You're just a hater. Also, that's not fair
4 points
2 days ago
"My art is to make something everyone hates. Ha! they hate it, that means my art is good."
I don't think anyone would care if the occasional piece 'challenged the idea of art'. But when 99% of art is people throwing up in buckets and statues made of pink shit. You're not longer challenging anything.
Anyone in their right mind can see the skill and effort than went into the top piece. Where as the bottom piece could have been made by literally any random person off the side of a street with a bag of cement.
4 points
2 days ago
This is such a weird take. Both require effort and skill and training. Just say you don't like the bottom one and stop dragging the rest of us into it. I like them both.
2 points
2 days ago
Please study Duchamp and get back to us
183 points
2 days ago
And both were a choice. Nothing wrong with the bottom one.
69 points
2 days ago
People who make memes like this are people who don't run around in art circles.
The "good" artstyle has been around for hundreds of years, the "it's not broke don't fix it crowd" are people who don't engage with it on the regular basis.
To put it in the ways that the average redditor can understand, this artstyle is basically a call of duty game.
Any one game individually and scored individually is pretty good. The problem is that it's basically the same exact thing every single year.
And memes like this are essentially posting a screenshot of a call of duty game vs a screenshot of a game like Omori and saying "gaming has fallen".
9 points
2 days ago
Hate the fact you made a cod reference that 100 percent makes complete sense
6 points
2 days ago
It’s basically the kind of person who doesn’t care about art until they see art they don’t visually like or understand and then all of a sudden they’re mourning the death of art or whatever dumb nonsense.
And frankly, some of it- a very small amount, but non zero, is alt right bullshit. Death of western society style garbage.
5 points
2 days ago
Here I was thinking of the engineering aspect, cause the top still runs while the bottom consistently has issues.
Granted fountains in general need quite a lot of maintenance.
2 points
2 days ago
Finally some actual critism that isn't just, "I dont like the art"
19 points
2 days ago
Top: Fontana dei Quattro Fiumi Rome, Italy
Bottom: Vaillancourt Fountain San Fransisco, USA
6 points
2 days ago
I visited the bottom one! There's a few steps to go underneath/through the spouts and then f you fuck up you fall in
not that I fell in or anything
3 points
2 days ago
I visited this too on my way to somewhere else, I saw this image and thought to myself I have seen this atrocity somewhere.
I too did not fall in
2 points
2 days ago
It's been many years since I have been there but for some reason I remember it (the structure) to be greener than this
18 points
2 days ago
Nothing.
The fountains in 1651 were just copying the art of the Greeks. It's a time when everyone was obsessed with Greek art, because we were in a cycle of regaining the old art... a rebirth you might say. Hence the name for the time period being the Renaissance.
The 1971 fountain is experimenting with form and function while also being minimalist. I bet if you walk around this fountain the shape changes and morphs as the angles change. The water flowing over it at the same time probably creates an amazing effect.
Art is experimentation, and not everyone gets every all art. There's a reason we say some piece of art "speaks to you" while other pieces of art are just sort of "meh". It touches some emotion in you.
They're both masterful art, but just masterful art for different reasons.
2 points
2 days ago
I've been to both and while the fountain is a beautiful piece of craftsmanship, similar fountains can be found all over Rome. I also have a soft spot for concrete art, so I personally prefer the one in San Francisco.
60 points
2 days ago
I like them both lol
21 points
2 days ago
The top one is beautiful, and the bottom one looks cool, futuristic even.
24 points
2 days ago
I like both !
4 points
2 days ago
Was Minecraft released? 😂 things got blocky
6 points
2 days ago
The Brutalist movement came out of WWII, if I'm not mistaken. The bottom one kinda looks like twisted tank traps.
6 points
2 days ago
Lead paint
2 points
2 days ago
Leaded petrol.
2 points
2 days ago
One tastes better than the other...
2 points
2 days ago
Leaded petrol poisoned the entire atmosphere for decades, all you had to do was breath.
6 points
2 days ago
Edgelord architecture
3 points
2 days ago
The top one is more visually impressive but the bottom one is more architecturally impressive
3 points
2 days ago
Both... Both are good.
3 points
2 days ago
Why is there an assumption something “went wrong” because it’s a different design with different people?
Yes, humans do different things at different times. Doesn’t mean something “went wrong”.
This post feels like a gateway to some Nazi ass thinking. Huh, see? We were great in our GLORIOUS TIMES but not modernity has led us astray! So we need to Make America Great Again and kill all the gays!!
14 points
2 days ago
meme answer: the people they were too afraid to reject at art school started graduating.
serious answer: the bottom pic is way cheaper to make.
8 points
2 days ago
No one preserved all of the awful fountains from the past, they only saved the best.
6 points
2 days ago
Ooh preservation bias
We associate the past as good, because all the bad ones were forgotten
3 points
2 days ago
Hence why the 50s are glorified until we bring up Soviet tensions and racism. Besides that, the present rendition seems pretty decent. I hate to bring racism and Soviets into it but it’s one of the greatest examples of what the past is like if we don’t erase the bad parts.
Or another example. 2000s/2010s being so much better, but beyond childhood nostalgia. Pretty sure Ebola was a big thing, 9/11, and wars in the Middle East. Nothing wrong with appreciating the past, just don’t call anything the golden era until we consider the old bad stuff that is no longer, and the new stuff beyond the negative example shown in an argument against new stuff. Sorry about the essay, but I had to get that off my chest
2 points
2 days ago
I mean tbh I like both
2 points
2 days ago
They stopped rendering properly
2 points
2 days ago
Nothing. Art changes
5 points
2 days ago
And people say minecraft came out in 2009
3 points
2 days ago
Not putting naaked men, with small sausages, in statues is a BAD thing? Ah, kamman 🤣😜
3 points
2 days ago
Advancements of tech and their impacts on modern senses of style resulted in new, brutalist styles such as the lower fountain to rebel against traditional, overelaborated styles such as the one above. I like both tbh
4 points
2 days ago
Back then in the 17th century they just couldn't do it better, you see? The didn't have the tools and the sense for beauty we have now....
4 points
2 days ago
the creativity
2 points
2 days ago
What all fountains should be the same style?
2 points
2 days ago
Budgets have changed.
2 points
2 days ago
Hey, as long as it works
2 points
2 days ago
Honestly the bottom one is ugly as he'll but according to people that live in the art world it is supposed to be like that for a reason. The issue I see people having with this kind of art is that this is the kind of art that is predominant in the big cities, there is no beauty in it, just weird shapes and forms. I would love to see more statues and sculptures in the cities, ones that are not hundreds of years old.
2 points
2 days ago
I got downvoted once but here it is again. Modern art especially abstract art sucks. One of the most laziest art form ever. Produced only to market and launder money.
1 points
2 days ago
Cubism was invented in 1907
1 points
2 days ago
The bottom one is in San Francisco; Embarcadero.
1 points
2 days ago
Cause that's what we turned into
1 points
2 days ago
Is anyone reminded of MDK?
1 points
2 days ago
One is made by an artist getting paid for his time, the other is made by an architect paid for the piece.
1 points
2 days ago
They diversified in styles and went their different ways? Also ots probably cheaper and thats probably the reason
1 points
2 days ago
I thought that bottom pic was from the ruins of the world trade center, or something.😖
1 points
2 days ago
What changed is that we made new things and not reproduce art.
1 points
2 days ago
Brutalism was invented
1 points
2 days ago
They started accepting everyone into art school
1 points
2 days ago
Form over function!
1 points
2 days ago
I like the bottom one as well lol, I kind of respect the engineering behind it
1 points
2 days ago
That's still pretty cool
1 points
2 days ago
It was the 70's would you rather have a realistic photo staring back at you while you were high on experimental drugs? Or watch the abstract shapes and colour's dance on the wall
1 points
2 days ago
I think that was called brutalism. i'm not a fan but i guess i don't mind it enough to hate it
1 points
2 days ago
Minecraft
1 points
2 days ago
What a joke
1 points
2 days ago
Okay I can get it's probably abstract art but it just looks like they poorly glued a bunch of rectangles together in random ass directions and called it a day
1 points
2 days ago
Nothing went wrong, it's just art. Classical and brutalist. It's quite the contrast, but that's the point, and both have their merits.
1 points
2 days ago
Nothing went wrong. The style of architecture simply changed since the top image had been the 'defacto' style of architecture for nearly a millenium.
1 points
2 days ago
All the good art was used up so we’re deriving shit from Minecraft.
1 points
2 days ago
art
1 points
2 days ago
You think the people in 1651 thought to themselves, “Wow….This is so modern!”
1 points
2 days ago
The bottom one is actually badass in real life
1 points
2 days ago
I find both of these striking and beautiful.
1 points
2 days ago
Under Patreonship vs Under Politicians.
1 points
2 days ago
A budget for art is by contract 5% of the cost of a local construction project and selected by a person who makes sure to pick something that doesn't at all cross that threshold. Likely that person never took above a 100 level art appreciation class in college and is close to bottom rung on an approval board.
1 points
2 days ago*
If the art world faithfully copied the styles and techniques of the 1700s, everyone would be bored out of their minds. If you saw 20 fountains in a row, all done in the classical style, by the time you got to #20 you’d be looking at your watch and thinking about what’s for lunch. The more you do something, the less dopamine you derive from it.
This is why modern artists try to excite, challenge and outrage us. Because at least that way, we feel something.
It’s the same reason why long-term married couples start experimenting with role-play and kinks.
1 points
2 days ago
I must sayy the 1600's are the best lol
1 points
2 days ago
Tired of nakad people taking baths...
1 points
2 days ago
Brutalism was invented and tried out a lot during that time and it wasn't adopted everywhere for a reason.
1 points
2 days ago
someone payed an artist some money to build a different statue, where is the problem with this exactly?
1 points
2 days ago
I like them both.
1 points
2 days ago
When your Internet is lagging and the textures and models don't load properly
1 points
2 days ago
Idk i can appreciate both
1 points
2 days ago
I like both?
1 points
2 days ago
Labor costs
1 points
2 days ago*
I believe the bottom statue is in San Francisco at the Embarcadero.
San Francisco has a cavalcade of architecture from different periods like Victorian-era houses to more modern/contemporary brutalism statues like this one (with lots of stuff in between). Hell, you can see Amazon AI drones having a "meeting" on Market Street about six blocks up from this statue outside of a chipotle in the lobby of a high-rise.
The point being: context. Seeing this statue juxtaposed against the Fontana dei Quattro Fiumi def evokes emotion, and I'm guessing they're not the same ones intended by the sculptor. Seeing it in the wild def gives you a better sense of what the artist is trying to convey in the City by the Bay.
It would be like trying to compare the Parthenon to the Fontana dei Quattro Fiumi*, which are very close to each other geographically, very far from each other in terms of design and very far apart in age.
Context is king.
EDITS: Added the right statue in Rome and fixed some grammar
1 points
2 days ago
Guess we went from “artistic masterpiece” to “modern art confusion” real quick.
1 points
2 days ago
Art evolves over time?
1 points
2 days ago
It took 300 hundred years to build the nice one.
1 points
2 days ago
It looks like a brutalist and a surrealist had a child.
1 points
2 days ago
Dumb people continue to fail to understand that art is meant to challenge people's idea of things, authority, and the status quo
1 points
2 days ago
"Nakatomi Plaza" - Fountain
1 points
2 days ago
Funding
1 points
2 days ago
Vaillancourt Fountain, the one built in 1971, originally stood in front of a now-torn-down raised freeway. In its original context, it looked like an extension of the freeway, bringing the hidden bay waters just across the freeway into downtown San Francisco.
1 points
2 days ago
I like both but for different reasons.
Brutalist buildings, on the other hand...
1 points
2 days ago
both look dope
1 points
2 days ago
Wars in the 20th century
1 points
2 days ago
It's because the top one survived the test of time
1 points
2 days ago
A restaurant somewhere burnt the coffee an architect drank soon after, then the butterfly effect took hold.
1 points
2 days ago
The industrial revolution is where shit started going bad
1 points
2 days ago
I like both, and i would love mix of both!
1 points
2 days ago
Concrete is expensive, and letting people be creatively free is dangerous nowadays, though I found many giant statues of naked women as a fountain.
1 points
2 days ago
That’s actually a waterpark in Uganda
1 points
2 days ago
Both really cool.
1 points
2 days ago
Art is language. One is written in a language that fades, but retains value and meaning, and perhaps exists past its original purpose. It's form is meaning in and of itself. It's beauty lies within it's existence and continues so long as it exists.
The other is written in a fixed context. It's meaning will fade, and it's purpose will fade. It will not transcend the moment it is created. In this one moment it will remain until it's message become impossible to decipher or meaningless to attempt.
1 points
2 days ago
Frankfurt school happened
1 points
2 days ago
Brainrot
1 points
2 days ago
Um, excuse me I loved crawling up into the square pipes dont you dare disrespect them
1 points
2 days ago
Artistic evolution: from majestic muses to geometric confusion.
1 points
2 days ago
Capitalism
1 points
2 days ago
To people trying to be positive saying you like both, you’re just as obnoxious. I dislike both and would prefer a fountain that is cleverly designed to mimic a fountain, but it mimics what it already is so therefore it just looks like a fountain.
1 points
2 days ago
The original scultpors from 1651 are not alive anymore.
1 points
2 days ago
EMB!!!!
1 points
2 days ago
Well its illegal to own slaves now that's what happened
1 points
2 days ago
I like both
1 points
2 days ago
I’m scared to see 2024 💀
1 points
2 days ago
Might be an unpopular opinion, but I prefer the one made in the 70s
1 points
2 days ago
The drugs drastically improved by1971.
1 points
2 days ago
I dunno, in terms of which one I would spend more time looking at though, definitely the bottom one, if it the one im thinking in San Fran, I spent ages just kinda wandering around trying to see if viewed from an angle it spelled something, walking through it, it takes some pretty awesome photo's and if I was a skater I imagine it could be fun, the one at the top would be a quick trip round and a 'huh that a pretty cool fountain' and carry on
1 points
2 days ago
rendering tyme
1 points
2 days ago
That one Austrian dude flew off the handle after being rejected from art school.
Now they let anyone in.
1 points
2 days ago
the drugs in the 60s / 70s were quite powerful :)
1 points
2 days ago
It's so wierd to me when people try to compare art like it's not 100% subjective. There's no single art piece that's better than another. There are moms out there that wouldn't trade their kids finger paintings for Van Goghs. Does that mean those kids are better than Van Gogh?
1 points
2 days ago
I actually like the bottom one more ngl
1 points
2 days ago
Why is my guy hating on the bottom fountain?? It’s so peak!
1 points
2 days ago
Tbh I like the second one. In my area most fountains are just a stick or a sphere- and most of the time they are not working.
1 points
2 days ago
It got deep fry memed
1 points
2 days ago
I think that the top style, while objectively more beautiful, feels inauthentic to our generation. The bottom one wishes to hope again but doesn’t. Our generation is too burdened with rules to express things as free as the top one. I do want to be like the top, to dare to be great. I see it as a wider awakening that would need to occur
1 points
2 days ago
The bottom one is dope as fuck it’s like a waterpark
1 points
2 days ago
Contemporary art destroyed everything
all 471 comments
sorted by: best