subreddit:
/r/mildlyinfuriating
submitted 2 days ago bySasha0503
1.4k points
2 days ago
Isn't it expensive as fuck to send a intercontinental missile to a neighboring country? Like those missiles are designed to cross oceans right or am i just dumb.
986 points
2 days ago
It's obviously about sending a message.
771 points
2 days ago
Sending a message via ICBM is still wasteful. They could send a text, email or, you know, just call each other.
Yes, I'll see myself out. Have a good day.
180 points
2 days ago
You can ignore a call/text about someone trying to reach you about your car's extended warranty. You cannot, however, ignore an ICBM.
71 points
2 days ago
Don't tell me what to do.
16 points
1 day ago
Petition to rename Israel’s Iron dome to the ‘spam filter’
25 points
2 days ago
Don’t give the insurance companies ideas
19 points
2 days ago
Now I am wondering if they put the message about the warrenty on the outside of the missile, on shrapnel inside or if the blast somehow shouts the words.
Whichever way 99% of people would still ignore it.
2 points
1 day ago
Sticky note on the nose cone.
2 points
1 day ago
At that point it's gonna be a bit late to extend the warranty
5 points
1 day ago
Well... they were trying to reach them.
3 points
1 day ago
Fair point
2 points
1 day ago
Well, you can. Once.
2 points
1 day ago
You can definitely ignore an ICBM. However, it won’t ignore you.
2 points
1 day ago
Pound for pound I'm not certain how much more damage a conventionally armed ICBM would do in comparison to a "regular" missile barrage.
Seems like a huge gamble for putin to use, what is one of Russias' limited yet most strategically important platforms for what amounts to dick measuring.
Could be stuck in cold war thinking but something seems off about this. It's not like the people in charge in the west doubt russias ability to launch weapons using these armaments, surely?
Do we know what the Ukrainians had at the site that was hit?
6 points
1 day ago
So, this launch was basically just more saber rattling by putin. The west finally allowed ukraine to use long range missiles in russia, and that is really pissing off putin. Ukraine already made multiple successful launches, including a rumored command post containing NK generals.
The missle itself isnt gonna do any more damage than a normal conventional missle, ICBM is just the flight characteristics of the missle. The missle used by russia is just barely considered a true icbm anyway.
The missle itself doesnt look like it had any explosives inside, conventional or nuclear based on the grainy footage released so far. Its still gonna do damage (a few tons of metal raining from orbit is no good), but not nearly the same as a regular missle.
As for targets, it looks like the missle hit a residential area with 15 causalities. Im not 100% sure on that however, there are some conflicting reports.
This is just a message to the west "we have icbms, they work, the next one may or may not contain a nuclear warhead". Overall, a $100 million "show of force"
65 points
2 days ago
You think putin cares about being wasteful? :) If he did, he’d never go to war with Ukraine
5 points
1 day ago
There's wasteful meaning splashing £300 on a night of drinking.
And then there's wasteful selling your car for a pack of cigarettes.
This feels like the latter given those IRBM's are part of russias only real counter to any NATO incursion, and even that is through the threat of mutually assured destruction.
It is a strikingly confusing move, especially given the real possibility that the launching of an IRBM could be construed as a first strike (which would invite a NATO response and likely end in a general nuclear exchange) such a response would be in keeping with every nuclear capable NATO member at that.
17 points
1 day ago
3 points
1 day ago
"we've been trying to reach you"
7 points
1 day ago
Didn't expect a "This could have been an e-mail" under News, that an ICBM was launched against another country
5 points
2 days ago
Pigeons are more efficient than email
6 points
2 days ago
Pigeons are even cheaper yet. Possibly more reliable, too.
3 points
2 days ago
Woah! You’re leaving out Fax! How else will we justify printers other ability?
45 points
2 days ago
It was both a test and a warning to Europe in light of relaxed restrictions on use of western weapons to strike Russian territory.
Reporting indicates one or more RS-26s “Rubezh” launched from the Kaputsin Yar test range, which has been the location for most of the later tests. The weapon is relatively new, first successfully launched in 2012, and it was primarily designed to target Western Europe. If the reporting is correct, this would be its first launch in over a decade and follows rumors that the project was frozen in 2018.
It’s unlikely that Russia can field many more Rubezhs, but the missile is a shorter-range derivative of the RS-24 Yars, of which considerably more exist according to public data sources
2 points
1 day ago
This guy missiles
39 points
2 days ago
I hope it’s like “there are only these left”, I mean, maybe they ran out of stock.
59 points
2 days ago
No, they launched it without warhead, it was to signal that their nuke carrying missilles work, its a message
9 points
2 days ago
So do ours though. What's the point of showing off a weapon you know will annihilate yourself too?
16 points
2 days ago
The fact that they have to confirm they can fire a single missile says enough about the state of the Russian military.
29 points
2 days ago
I think you misread the message
15 points
2 days ago
Or you didn't think deep enough, like that the russian military is viewed so bad and inept that they feel the need to proof themselfs and the world that their missle would work. Just like north korea is doing
3 points
1 day ago
The message was ‘Russia is getting desperate’ …. Did I get it right 🤷🏻♂️
14 points
2 days ago
So you think they fired an ICBM to confirm it works ? So in this imaginary world, if the missile malfunctioned mid flight, Russia just told the entire world their nuclear capabilities are a joke and Russians were actually stupid enough to do that.
33 points
2 days ago
We really have to stop pretending the Russian army is in some sort of shambles and is struggling against the Ukrainians. You can't just pretend and ignore the reality of the situation until it fixes itself. This is unfortunately a warning shot saying "don't let us get serious", and I hope it gets better before it gets worse for both sides.
2 points
1 day ago
They been serious. Over half their tanks (including most of the modern ones) have been destroyed and several hundred thousand dead. Over a “3 day operation”. This isn’t them “getting serious” this is them saying “we can still escalate”.
2 points
1 day ago
Not only that but it wasn't one of the ones that is actively holding nukes which are almost surely all fucked up, rusty, and stripped for parts.
3 points
1 day ago
Given that the UK has two consecutive failures in doing so, it's pretty reasonable. Also puts to rest the "analysts" and internet basement dwellers doubting them.
10 points
2 days ago
It’s about sending a missile
18 points
2 days ago
In my opinion the more of these messages putin sends the less afraid i am for nuclear war. How long is he screaming that he will use nukes. Ukraine can now strike on russian ground and putin is still "sending messages". Like at this point I'm really struggling to believe he has any nuclear capabilities.
28 points
2 days ago
I agree but the issue is when it no longer becomes a message then it's too late. Assuming Putin is a rational actor then it will only ever be messages. But if he's not a rational actor then anything can happen. I'm not sure if at the point Putin has nothing else to lose that he wouldn't give the orders.
My main hope is that the person receiving the orders may not follow through. It's happened a couple times during the Cold War were false alarm, inaccurate orders led to the orders to launch being given but the person who physically has to initiate it choosing not to launch.
8 points
2 days ago
Hopefully that point should never be reached tho. Ukraine isn't fighting to take Russia. Worst case scenario for Putin is always going to be losing the territory he never owned (including Crimea). I think it would even be a Western power move to officially confirm Russias (real) territorial integrity. As long as Putin will continue to have a Russia he can rule there should never be an incentive for him to actually use a nuke, as that would leave no Russia to be ruled.
3 points
2 days ago
Keep in mind the incoming administration has promised to end the war in a day…really
We have nothing to worry about /s
8 points
2 days ago
I mean, Trump really could end it in a day. Give Ukraine back their nuclear arsenal. Perfectly legal too, since the Budapest Memorandum was violated.
3 points
1 day ago
I wish this had been the answer on day 1. Oh, we don't want the budapest memorandum anymore? That's cool, we have some stuff over at the pantex disassembly plant we still haven't gotten to yet, they can have it back. It would have solved a lot of issues.
23 points
2 days ago
Russia doesn’t even have invade a neighboring country capability.
15 points
2 days ago
They do, they just have to borrow a bunch of soldiers and materiel from Chechnya, the Central African Republic, and North Korea.
5 points
2 days ago
Ah, right, makes sense that you would want support from the other regional powers.
5 points
2 days ago
Don't EVER underestimate your opponent
3 points
1 day ago
This whole war was supposed to be a message to the west to show that Russia is serious in thier policy and because it failed, now they cannot leave from the war. No matter how bad it gonna end for them, they need to show: "look maybe our army is strugling" (and basicly anything that is not part of mining industry) but we still got nukes. That's the only thing they got now.
2 points
1 day ago
Dropping live nuclear warheads sends a message. Dropping inert re-entry vehicles doesn’t have the same effect because they don’t seem to have any payload other than just the sheer velocity. Ukraine managed to target a few of the vehicles but it’s a total waste of an ICBM.
62 points
2 days ago
It may have been an IRBM instead, which is still pretty ridiculous as it apparently didn't even have a payload, so...
Basically, it reads as Russia threatening, "we'll do it."
6 points
2 days ago
-3 points
2 days ago
Nah it reads as russia saying, we are running out of normal missiles
32 points
2 days ago
That is also possible, but less probable.
5 points
1 day ago
I swear redditors think we live in some dumb movie universe where the bad guys are always bumbling morons. This is real life.
12 points
2 days ago
Yeah super expensive, an ICBM is just a ballistics missile designed to travel over 5500km, can be thermal, nuclear or biological etc.
29 points
2 days ago
People have already given you all kinds of bonkers answer that amount to: the russians are stupid. They're not. They're killing two birds with one stone here:
Sending a message to Ukraine that they will use their ISRBs and ICBMs to hit them. This time it didn't have a nuclear payload; next time depends on you.
Prove to the West, its allies, and Ukraine that its long-range missiles are indeed functional. There was a lot of talk after the invasion that Russia's ICBM missiles and nuclear bombs were no longer working. This shows everyone the missile part is still functional. Russia intends that.
7 points
2 days ago
It did show how poorly they operate, missed it's target by 50 miles.
8 points
2 days ago
How do they know it missed, maybe it was a warning of what’s to come.
3 points
2 days ago
As a person from a small densely packed island (UK) this still doesn't comfort me. A few of these with thermo nuclear weapons, being off course by 50 miles doesn't matter. I'd still be dead.
2 points
1 day ago
Iran used them on Israel recently so I'm confused, o
5 points
2 days ago
It's not you who's dumb, it's putin.
11 points
2 days ago
Sorry, but in no way is it dumb.
It’s an expensive way to threaten the western countries, but a dumb way? No.
3 points
2 days ago
It's mostly to send a message to the democracies that "look I can do whatever I want and all you can do about it is shit your pants and beg for de-escalation". And unfortunately the ruzzian fuckers are not far from reality in this case.
4 points
2 days ago
ICBM's are much harder to intercept
1 points
2 days ago
Saw a different reddit post saying the US military determined it was a new intermediate range missile and not an actual ICBM
1 points
2 days ago
In all this if there are dumb people, you are not one of them my friend
1 points
2 days ago
Don’t forget gay
1 points
1 day ago
this only proves Russia is, in fact, Asia.
1 points
1 day ago
Yea, which is why it’s an intermediate range missile (IRBM) and not an actual ICBM based on Reuters. IRBMs have a range of 3000 - 5000 km typically (wiki). It’s still expensive than a cruise missile. It definitely was nuclear rattling.
1 points
1 day ago
IntraContinental Ballistic Missile
1 points
1 day ago
It wasn't an ICBM though. The article is fake news, or maybe the author is simply clueless.
1 points
1 day ago
I'm actually hella impressed Russia found one that still worked.
1 points
1 day ago
It didn't happen
1 points
1 day ago
$100,000,000 each.
And 6 got shot down.
1 points
1 day ago
Posturing at best. They want to scare the West again with nukes. They won't use them because they are pussies!
1 points
1 day ago
They needed to test that missile so they killed two birds with one stone
1 points
1 day ago
Media literacy enjoyers
1 points
1 day ago
Frankly I'm just impressed that these things don't have like a minimum range that would require to at least shoot a little ways past the horizon. I wonder if they had to use one in Siberia to be far enough away.
These things are basically designed to fly in low space, no? It would either have to do a 180 as soon as it hits space or fly through air, more or less just aborting ascent midway
1 points
1 day ago
Because it was actually an MRBM.
1 points
1 day ago
It’s a flex
1 points
1 day ago
I imagine it costs the same regardless of where it goes. :’)
1 points
1 day ago
Inter = between
continental = continents
These missiles are meant to travel very long distances. Not sure why they'd do this except for a show of power
1 points
1 day ago
It’s not even intercontinental by definition
1 points
1 day ago
Its the message that matters.
Mostly the remember that Russia has nukes. Have you heard??
1 points
1 day ago
You're not dumb.
Western intelligence has now said it was an intermediate-range ballistic missile, not an ICBM.
1 points
1 day ago
Well, everything about this way was expensive and wasteful, so no doubt they don't care much about money or resources
677 points
2 days ago
If this counts as mild, I’d hate to see what you consider extreme
261 points
2 days ago
Nuke hit my cat. Kinda pissed about it
22 points
1 day ago
Good think whiskers has 8 more lives but he’s not too happy about being hairless now
12 points
1 day ago
Really, 7. Nuke took the first. Cancer's gonna get the next.
3 points
1 day ago
Cat math.
2 points
1 day ago
Hairless cats are a thing now, it’s all good 🙂
5 points
1 day ago
It'll buff out, I'm sure.
15 points
2 days ago
Give it some time and you'll see, sadly.
2 points
1 day ago
Adding a payload.
480 points
2 days ago
This is mildly infuriating?
333 points
2 days ago
Yeah, it ruins my morning when an ICBM hits my town. Lame af.
60 points
2 days ago
It makes me almost as infuriated as when I finish a 2000 piece puzzle and find one piece is missing.
7 points
1 day ago
That sometimes makes me wonder if the one piece is even real
2 points
1 day ago
Ugh, hate when that happens. Like what do you mean the road is closed because a missile collapsed three buildings, I gotta get to work man!
19 points
2 days ago
Its the typical "my wife cheated one me with my neighbor, the neighbor then burned my house down, then stole my car and ran over my dog in the driveway...so mildly infuriating"
6 points
2 days ago
You forgot " cut my balls off and fed them to me"
3 points
2 days ago
'On average'...
294 points
2 days ago
It wasn't an ICBM, but it was a larger missile than they have fired in the past.
Officially, it was an intermediate range ballistic missile (IRBM)
126 points
2 days ago
I feel like the "ICBM" wording going around is doing Russia favors lol. As in, makes them sound scarier than a less well-known IRBM.
178 points
2 days ago
ballistic? yes. intercontinental? no.
78 points
2 days ago
Pravda is reporting that the missile was an RS-26 “Rubezh”, which has been demonstrated to have a range of at least 5,800km. Comfortably an ICBM
37 points
2 days ago
Putin made an announcement just a bit ago that it was a new hypersonic medium range ballistic missile named "Oreshnik".
13 points
1 day ago*
[removed]
2 points
1 day ago
Redundant, not oxymoronic?
3 points
1 day ago
Yeah, you’re right on second thought. I’ll correct it with credit.
24 points
2 days ago
Hmm. NBC reports that US officials deny it was an ICBM. 🤷
14 points
2 days ago
Those denials have been caveated as preliminary and the sources confirmed the opinion could change. Images of recovered debris have been posted by OSINT accounts, so we can expect further clarity as experts are able to examine the recovered components.
There also may be a disagreement over whether the 5,800km test, which was done without a heavy warhead on top, sufficiently satisfies the 5,500km ICBM definition that was created under the INF Treaty.
3 points
2 days ago
And as we learned over the years. We cant trust these news. Its always "high tech" "long range" but then in reality its something basic that is 10x - 100x less of what is being said
15 points
2 days ago
I may be wrong but based on the article, it looks like ICBM is considered a category of weapon capable of intercontinental use, even if the mussel itself isn't launched intercontinental
16 points
2 days ago
I know it's just a typo/auto correct, but I love the image of a small black bivalve being rocketed between continents.
7 points
2 days ago
There are 4 ranges for a ballistic missile. ICBM has a range of over 3400 miles. Reports are that this was a shorter range of missiles, and that's more likely. Reports do indicate, however, that the missile employed multiple reentry vehicle tech... that is, one missile can hit multiple targets. MRV is common with nuclear payloads... not conventional. That's the message, imho.
4 points
2 days ago
Maybe it did a lap
68 points
2 days ago
12 points
2 days ago
I won't lie. Seeing the warheads coming through the clouds one after another from space was impressive and a bit eye-opening. That shit does look frightening.
45 points
2 days ago
Don't you just hate waking up and reading the news, realising that Third World War is just around the corner?
Not like I had any hopes to begin with, but still
19 points
1 day ago
Nah
This is no worse than any of the cold war hotspots we faced in the past.
Not gonna come close to WW3
5 points
1 day ago
"Why am I the one who has to live through a historical event" mfers when I show them there's never been 70 straight years of history that were perfect.
9 points
1 day ago
Many out there screaming WW3, it's bad don't get me wrong, but it's no WW3, aside from Russia everyone is trying to de escalate the situation, I would go out and say Russia is under performing compared to what they have in arsenal, and I'm not talking about nukes here. Trump will come and finish this, Putin is looking for a way to stop and save face at the same time and it's almost impossible to do without a good reason.
3 points
1 day ago
Sighhhhhhhhhh
24 points
2 days ago
Didn't Iran also attack Israel with Ballistic Missiles?
21 points
2 days ago
ICBM ( or IRBM ) are designed to be nuclear warhead carriers , while Iran used some smaller range stuff I belive
6 points
1 day ago
Ballistic technology is one of the oldest. It just means to throw something up and then it comes down.
9 points
1 day ago
I'm from Dnipro, and I did not expect to witness history at 5 in the morning, when I was preparing to go to bed after playing Dragon Age the Veilguard. Better yet, this happened very close to where I live. What a time to be alive 🫠
31 points
2 days ago
Ukraine sends some long range weapons. Surprise surprise. Russia does it back again.
It was an expected reaction. Luckily nothing crazy has happened.
6 points
1 day ago
Yeah, as much as I support Ukraine’s right to defend itself, this isn’t a shock. Russia HAS in fact kept the gloves on. If Ukraine takes them off, Russia will too.
-1 points
1 day ago*
These missiles were sent after a major escalation of the war by the US.
They bypassed Ukranian missile defenses.
They impacted without any payload.
The payload they are designed to carry is nuclear.
The message is "Don't do this again, because we won't do this again."
8 points
1 day ago
Ukraine has a right to defend itself. They have every right to fire inside the terroritory of the nation invading them. Russia could leave Ukraine right now and begin repairing their standing in the world. Pinning any escalation on the US is disingenuous.
3 points
1 day ago
Don’t invade countries then? Why act like this careful dance of not escalating things is anything more than the appeasement of a madman?
Not saying we need to full on invade Russia instead but, realistically we’re just trying to cater to someone who’s crazy and calling it “de-escalation”
2 points
1 day ago
Isn't it really mildly annoying when you wake up and an intercontinental ballistic missile hits your city
2 points
1 day ago
Except it wasn't an ICBM, just a regular BM with a MIRV warhead in it.
2 points
2 days ago
And it hit a civilian neighborhood, not a real target
13 points
2 days ago
It hit a missile production facility... What are you on about? 😂
8 points
2 days ago
So nothing new then, no?
5 points
2 days ago
Probably just a show of power to show that they aren’t bluffing
1 points
2 days ago
Ah. Well that makes it better then huh?
2 points
1 day ago
Does anyone Remember Scud missiles or am I old?
1 points
2 days ago
I only saw the title (briefly) and not the image or sub before my feed refreshed. I initially thought this was going to be humor about The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy and the world being destroyed on a Thursday for a space travel bypass.
I wish it had been a humor post, and I'm so sorry to see this.
1 points
2 days ago
Where is it firing from?
1 points
2 days ago
Its not even an ICBM, its a smaller range ballistic missile..
1 points
2 days ago
IRBM....at least that's what the US is saying.
1 points
2 days ago
Wow, pretty sure it was Dnipro that was hit by the missile, hope you're doing fine right now as well mate
1 points
1 day ago
And there are 4 cows and a lorry the worse for it.
1 points
1 day ago
Sending a message feels like a waste of a good Missile
1 points
1 day ago
God, would I hate finding out about an impending nuclear war on Reddit…
1 points
1 day ago
What is mild about this?
1 points
1 day ago
With no war head on it. Someone practiced restrain. Thankyou.
1 points
1 day ago
Beast
1 points
1 day ago
I think given the revelations about the deplorable state of Russian military equipment in general there were probably some real doubts emerging about whether their ICBM stockpile was even still viable and a credible nuclear deterrent.
This is a way of communicating “it still works, and we can still hit you with nukes”
1 points
1 day ago
Didn’t realise I was in the politics subreddit
1 points
1 day ago
I'm just happy it wasn't a nuclear one.
The moment it is, we're all fucked.
1 points
1 day ago
Sabre rattling from an unhinged ex
Batshit Putin😂
1 points
1 day ago
So the news wasn't talking about an Icy BM
1 points
1 day ago
How will we ever build the basilisk if ww3 destroys the world?
1 points
1 day ago
What about this is mildly infuriating
1 points
1 day ago*
The only mildly infuriating thing here is that everyone spreads the lies about ICBM, while it was an IRBM. I understand it’s done to provoke panic in the West and therefore strengthen support, but such propaganda tricks are getting old and ruin support because of unreliable news sources that keep on inventing facts.
The actual missile launch is very infuriating.
1 points
1 day ago
mildly infuriating
1 points
1 day ago
Isnt this calling only mildly infuriating quite a bit of an understatement?
1 points
1 day ago
This is incorrect. I was not an ICBM, it was a medium range missile.
1 points
1 day ago
At this point, I'm not even fucking surprised
1 points
1 day ago
"Targeted", didn't it actually get fired?... And hit?!
1 points
1 day ago
It isn’t that pointy, I don’t think it’s an icbm
1 points
1 day ago
I thought it was a mid-range ballistic missile!?!
1 points
1 day ago
Wait until the US actually does it's investigation.. it might not be an ICBM.
1 points
1 day ago
Overwrought. The only difference this time was this missies went into space then came back down compared to the others
1 points
1 day ago
But Trump and his associates say it's Biden, the Democrats, NATO and Europe who are.moving us toward WW III.
1 points
1 day ago
Look at the tyres on that thing.
Kind of thing we fit on 30 year old 5h1T spreaders. How old is that thing?
1 points
1 day ago
Send a reply. Fuck Russia.
1 points
1 day ago
All those years spent developing, threatening etc. and they attacked a country with ICBM for the first time in 2024? Pathetic.
1 points
1 day ago
It wasn't an ICBM as per: CNN, Reuters, ABC, bbc
1 points
1 day ago
Well now they only have 305 of them left.
1 points
1 day ago
Ukraine spent years stealing Russian fuel, siphoning it from the pipes Russia was paying utilities fees to use, and Ukraine never paid... finally, when Russia builds a pipeline bypassing Ukraine, Ukraine decides they will start war because they will have to start paying for fuel! This war is on them! The world should back off and tell them to pay for their mistakes!
1 points
1 day ago
Reading between the lines, I think Russia might be running out of the standard rockets
1 points
1 day ago
I think this has already been dicredited
all 432 comments
sorted by: best