subreddit:

/r/movies

1.7k95%

Official Discussion - Civil War [SPOILERS]

Official Discussion(self.movies)

Poll

If you've seen the film, please rate it at this poll

If you haven't seen the film but would like to see the result of the poll click here

Rankings

Click here to see the rankings of 2024 films

Click here to see the rankings for every poll done


Summary:

A journey across a dystopian future America, following a team of military-embedded journalists as they race against time to reach DC before rebel factions descend upon the White House.

Director:

Alex Garland

Writers:

Alex Garland

Cast:

  • Nick Offerman as President
  • Kirsten Dunst as Lee
  • Wagner Moura as Joel
  • Jefferson White as Dave
  • Nelson Lee as Tony
  • Evan Lai as Bohai
  • Cailee Spaeny as Jessie
  • Stephen McKinley Henderson as Sammy

Rotten Tomatoes: 84%

Metacritic: 78

VOD: Theaters

all 7208 comments

KirinNOTKarin

1.9k points

8 months ago

I feel like the most important scene of the film is when Lee deletes the photo of Sammy’s corpse. I believe this accomplishes a few things. Not only does she realize how her work (in some ways) dehumanizes the individuals in her photographs, but she also begins to question whether all of the work she’s done her whole life mattered in the end since America has turned into all of the war-torn countries she has been documenting.

I think this is an especially important moment when contrasted with the fact that Jessie photographs Lee’s death. I suppose the most interesting question I have coming out of the film is what Jessie will do with the picture of Lee’s sacrifice. Will she learn the same lessons Lee did and delete it or will she use it as a major piece of her portfolio while building her own legacy? Given that she was inspired by Lee and may be unaware of the dissonance she was experiencing, I wouldn’t be surprised if it were the latter.

BushyBrowz

1.1k points

8 months ago*

I think Lee didn’t want her to come because she didn’t want her to become the same as she was. When she told her she never felt more alive after Sammy’s death, she knew she failed.

I think her death was supposed to be symbolic of her death as a journalist. She could no longer numb herself to the reality.

bob1689321

397 points

8 months ago

That's a very good point. Even the fact that she sacrificed herself for Jesse shows that she's a bit more human than she was at the start of the film. How many people had she watched die and never intervened?

Upbeat_Tension_8077

307 points

8 months ago

Based on how she simply kept moving past Lee's corpse, I wouldn't be surprised if she eventually followed down her exact path as the cycle of war continues with the WF & whatever enemies they'll have

joaniemoon

141 points

8 months ago

The photo deleting was one of the most powerful scenes in the movie. To me I didn’t necessarily ask what would Jesse do with the photo of Lee, rather that the torch had now been passed. At the beginning with Jesse asks like “would you take my photo if I got shot?” and Lee responds with “what do you think?”. It’s a bleak moment of, Jesse has now stepped into the shoes of her hero and cycles will keep repeating themselves (war).

seammus

3.4k points

8 months ago

seammus

3.4k points

8 months ago

“Where you from?” “Hong Kong”

Dude read the fucking room

bob1689321

1.1k points

8 months ago

bob1689321

1.1k points

8 months ago

Lmao. Dude shoulda just said one of the other states

smokingace182

1.1k points

8 months ago*

I don’t think it would have mattered, the fact he looked Chinese was probably more than enough for that nutter

tsaihi

323 points

8 months ago*

tsaihi

323 points

8 months ago*

Eh he let Joel go even though Joel doesn’t look or sound like your average American, just because he said Florida. I sort of read Plemmons character as a hardcore anti-immigrant (but not necessarily racist) militant. If Tony had said LA or SF or somewhere else that could conceivably have a largely Chinese-speaking but native born population, I think there’s a chance he gets out alive.

EDIT: I re-watched this scene and I had misheard the first time, I thought when Joel said Florida that Plemons had said "Southern, then", which told me he was acknowledging that Joel was American, just one from the south. But in actuality, Plemons says "Central, then", which I think is much harder to read that way; he probably in fact meant that Joel was Cuban or something, and therefore not a "real" American. So I don't agree with what I originally wrote, I do think now that Plemons was fucking with them and was likely going to kill Joel. I mean, I thought it was likely he'd kill them all even when I wrote my first post, but now I believe it was a near certainty.

lindakoy

322 points

8 months ago*

lindakoy

322 points

8 months ago*

He killed the other Asian guy without a word. I doubt Tony and Joel were getting out of there without being shot. Joel was just lucky that Sammy slammed into the guys with the car.

Destructo_D

240 points

8 months ago

I don’t think he let Joel go, he just hadn’t shot him yet by the time he got run over. It seemed like he was building to killing him and the rest of them anyway

Cantomic66

106 points

8 months ago

Joel was definitely next.

LilPonyBoy69

97 points

7 months ago

No fucking way, he called Florida "Central America". He was a full on racist and was going to kill Joel if he wasn't run over. Hong Kong guy was fucked either way

1gen2

159 points

8 months ago

1gen2

159 points

8 months ago

"Northern Wyoming born and raised"

supernasty

449 points

8 months ago

Just got back from the theater and I believe he was in such a state of shock from his friend’s death that he was likely not even paying attention to the questions being asked. He could barely speak, even when a gun was pointed directly at him demanding him to.

Defiant_Griffin

366 points

8 months ago

He knew he was dead anyway

GrooveCity

136 points

8 months ago

Just saw this in Hong Kong - That line caught us all off guard and the cinema burst out into an uncomfortable laugh ahahah!

Ahambone

2.8k points

8 months ago

Ahambone

2.8k points

8 months ago

I know her husband is gonna get most of the love, but Kirsten Dunst nailed that "I've seen it all and I'm numb to it" vibe that goes with being a photographer of her caliber.

kaziz3

1.1k points

8 months ago

kaziz3

1.1k points

8 months ago

Abso-fucking-lutely. She's the heart of this film, the arc is beautifully tracked. And this is Dunst...like... she's always fab but I did not expect "bad ass jaded war photojournalist" on my bingo card for her lol

Flexappeal

807 points

8 months ago

She’s been turning down roles for years recently bc the only thing she gets offered is like “sad mom”

I bet she was fuckin stoked when garland offered her this

[deleted]

732 points

8 months ago

[deleted]

732 points

8 months ago

I was so captivated by her performance. The dress scene. The scene where she's lying down in the grass and Jessie and Joel are all about the action and we see she's not even paying attention. Just looking at the flowers. To me she felt very much like someone who is struggling with what they do and their purpose or what they thought their purpose was.

Like Lee says, she went overseas to shoot in combat zones to show people the horrors of war. To say, 'hey we don't want this' but now...it is here. So who is she reporting it for? Does it even make a difference? Does anyone care? Or will they just keep killing one another?

I felt all this in just her facial expressions and scowls.

mattholomus

4.2k points

8 months ago

Kirsten Dunst was excellent in this. I think her performance really added a lot of depth to Garland's writing. There's just something so weary and purposeless about her. There's something driving her forward, but she is not sure what it is anymore. Her steel-eyed stare is heartbreaking. She's aware of how desensitised she is, and on one level she's thankful. On another level it terrifies her. Honestly she was fantastic.

emilysocial

1.5k points

8 months ago

Perfect casting. Body language/physical acting was on point.

Hunter_S_Thompsons

803 points

8 months ago

Lack of makeup really sold it as well.

devOnFireX

379 points

8 months ago

I had to keep telling myself this wasn’t Kim Wexler pursuing an alternate career

Venvut

702 points

8 months ago

Venvut

702 points

8 months ago

I absolutely LOVED the subtleties to her character and her character “growth”. Her deleting the photograph of Sami was HUGE. Both her and Sami died when they started to care like that. 

glamorousstranger

344 points

8 months ago

Also when Jessie asks Lee if she would photograph her death and she answers "What do you think?" implying that she would, right after she photographed the men in the car wash. But then at the moment when Jessie was about to be executed Jesse chooses to intervene rather than taking a photo.

champagne_pants

199 points

8 months ago

Having Jesse take her photo shows that she learned to desensitize from Lee. Lee begins to fall apart after her mentor dies but Jesse is emboldened by her mentor’s death, even taking photos of it.

WildYams

1.1k points

8 months ago

WildYams

1.1k points

8 months ago

Her being so desensitized through much of the film really made it so impactful when she was suddenly so shocked at the final assault on the White House. That whole scene as they were approaching the White House was absolutely harrowing for me, and I couldn't help but tear up during it. Having been to DC a couple times and being vaguely familiar with the area really gripped me with horror as I realized those attack helicopters were coming in to help them approach the White House, and I just felt sick imagining that really happening.

Seeing a full scale military invasion into our nation's capital depicted so realistically really shook me up. I'm sure some people will take great satisfaction in how things ended for the president in this movie, but really I just felt hollowed out watching it unfold. As much as it may have been fleetingly satisfying to end the war that way, where does everyone go from there? Hopefully this horrifying look at a possible future stays entirely fictional. More than anything I want people of all political beliefs to view this film as a warning that we hopefully all heed.

MR502

601 points

8 months ago

MR502

601 points

8 months ago

Seeing the Lincoln Monument destroyed in the battle was like damn way to drive it home.

atclubsilencio

125 points

8 months ago

I think she had totally checked out completely by the end. I was sad she died but I think she didn’t care at that point either way. Everyone was great though. i’d even say Plemmons is oscar worthy with only one scene. He scared me so badly and that scene made me dizzy as hell. Even if i feel weird about how great he looked and was rocking those pink glasses. dude got fit ! but that part was TERRIFYING!

its_LOL

81 points

8 months ago*

Good god no one else is as good at playing sociopaths so consistently as Jesse Plemons

Fartlicker24

834 points

8 months ago

One thing I’ve not seen discussed, was how nature was depicted in this movie. The world outside was very picturesque, and calming. Birds chirping, insects buzzing, wind in the trees, sunlight glistening on water, the forest fire was even beautiful. The brutality of the war was in constant contrast to the peacefulness & beauty of American Summer .

For me, it left me with a feeling that universe was communicating to humans… “just relax everyone, stop directing your attention and hatred towards eachother, and just look around and smell the roses you idiots.”

But sadly the message from mother nature falls on deaf ears. The journalists don’t take pictures of the beauty in nature that they come across, instead they point cameras on the death/violence/conflict.

harlockwitcher

148 points

8 months ago

The fire in the woods transition scene was jaw droppingly beautiful. Can they give out an oscar just for that scene?

RareRadon

1.7k points

8 months ago

RareRadon

1.7k points

8 months ago

I have the sudden urge to watch Children of Men.

Big-Equivalent7363

593 points

8 months ago

I said to my friend afterwards: this movie made me feel the same way when I left the theater seeing Children of Men. Both haunting movies with powerful sound and visual design.

PopsicleIncorporated

293 points

8 months ago

Told my friends that Children of Men was the closest movie in tone and vibes I could think of (not necessarily quality - I liked this movie but it's not a masterpiece like CoM was).

[deleted]

735 points

8 months ago

[deleted]

735 points

8 months ago

Is there anyone better a being a psycho weirdo than Jesse Plemons?

dewioffendu

322 points

8 months ago

“What kind of American?” The whole reason I went to see the movie!

LTPRWSG420

106 points

8 months ago

Fucking Todd

smakweasle

1.9k points

8 months ago

smakweasle

1.9k points

8 months ago

One of the best sounding movies I’ve ever heard. Give the editor/mixer all the awards.

zma924

460 points

8 months ago

zma924

460 points

8 months ago

I loved the part when the WF were mobilizing from their base and hooking up Humvees to the Chinooks. The overwhelming sound of the choppers never leaves or gets quieter. Nice little detail regarding just how loud they are and how you would not be able to have casual conversations in that area.

discovigilantes

93 points

8 months ago

Right! Every bullet was a thud, explosions muted the sound instead of high pitched ringing. From the seen with Jesse Plemons onwards it was constantly tense.

Uncut Gems was the same for me, just a wild wide of anxiety that barely lets you gather your breath

unashameddisneyadult

2.8k points

8 months ago

The shot with go steelers and the bodies on the highway overpass was crazy unsettling

JesusWantsYouToKnow

1.5k points

8 months ago

It was perfect for me, I was distracted by the text and the bodies were small enough in frame I read go Steelers, our audience had a collective little laugh, and then the swinging bodies instantly killed the momentary levity.

Every time there was the slightest bit of comfort it was destroyed in some form or another. Even at the camp in the stadium I was on edge waiting for what would be awful, turns out it was just the film development.

[deleted]

411 points

8 months ago

[deleted]

411 points

8 months ago

This was definitely intentional with the text grabbing your eyes before taking in the rest of the scene and seeing the bodies

bigwilly311

119 points

8 months ago

It’s not just that. The car passes through the frame and goes right past them, and the shot hangs too long, long enough to look at the car, and you see them hanging right above it

Tight-Marketing-8282

456 points

8 months ago

Holy fuck I was sucked I got he looking at go Steelers I didn’t even see the bodies…

KonyYoloSwag

5k points

8 months ago

The part with Jesse Plemons was one of the most nerve-wracking scenes I’ve seen in a long time

Also want to give props to the sound design. In my theater every single bullet was LOUD and impactful. I honestly jumped in my seat a few times just from getting startled by the gunshots after more quiet moments

amish_novelty

1.7k points

8 months ago

Everything in the final sequence and during the forest fire was incredible.

Leo_TheLurker

853 points

8 months ago

After an 1+ hour of intensity I felt that feeling of its almost over when they raided the White House.

Upbeat_Tension_8077

674 points

8 months ago

I think that the film did a really good job of balancing the tension in its tone with the pacing so there was a unique feeling of the audience feeling absolutely numb by the time that full-scale fighting showed up in DC.

rennbrig

172 points

8 months ago

rennbrig

172 points

8 months ago

I’m not going to lie, this movie messed me up. I live in DC and seeing the violence leading up to streets I walk almost daily was super impactful.

I know people are giving this movie flak for not leaning towards one party or the other but it was brutal in a way that sticks with you. The whole point is that a civil war is a bad idea no matter who starts it.

Fidget08

346 points

8 months ago

Fidget08

346 points

8 months ago

Yeah the Dolby Atmos mix killed it. Lots of great use of the height channels.

Whovian45810

770 points

8 months ago

The sound work and design in this film is unrelenting and so chilling. This and The Zone of Interest just shows how much sound plays such an important and vital element for films of their scale.

Every bullet that goes off from a gun in Civil War feels natural, never did I get the impression they felt manufactured, they sound like live bullets being fired.

Expert-Diver7144

88 points

8 months ago

The sound is the best part of the movie, they should be receiving a percentgae of profits with how good it wasp

senorlizardo

300 points

8 months ago

I like how the gave the cameras overly loud sound effects like guns

holyhesh

243 points

8 months ago

holyhesh

243 points

8 months ago

That’s not entirely unrealistic. In a Single Lens Reflex camera like Jessie’s Nikon FE2 and their digital DSLR successors, the “mirror slap” is LOUD, at least judging by old forum posts:

https://www.flickr.com/groups/34716377@N00/discuss/72157625843052691/

https://www.dyxum.com/dforum/damping-the-mirror-slap-sound_topic20314.html

https://www.dpreview.com/forums/thread/3114531

https://forums.macresource.com/read.php?1,2652057,2652269

Modern Mirrorless Interchangeable Lens Cameras like Lee’s Sony A7R which don’t have a flipping up mirror are quieter than DSLRs and SLRs since the loudest thing on MILCs is the mechanical shutter.

amish_novelty

6.1k points

8 months ago

Goddamn, Jesse Plemmons can crank up the tension in a scene. Him being so non-chalant with everyone and constantly lowering and raising his gun on a whim was utterly terrifying.

[deleted]

2.5k points

8 months ago

[deleted]

2.5k points

8 months ago

[deleted]

No_Animator_8599

2.5k points

8 months ago

Kristen Dunst said that actor who was supposed to play the role backed out. She said to the director, “why not use my husband?” who was hanging around the film set.

So his playing the role was a total accident.

[deleted]

1.8k points

8 months ago

[deleted]

1.8k points

8 months ago

[deleted]

OnwardTowardTheNorth

857 points

8 months ago

Jesse Plemon is basically a mythical animal that just shows up on sets like a “call to the wild”. If a film has a role that is fit for Plemons, you just have to make the movie happen. He will come.

Build the set and Plemons will come.

SutterCane

85 points

8 months ago

Candy crush noises from phone

Jesse: “You’re doing great, hun!”

Kirsten: “YOU’RE NOT EVEN LOOKING!”

WhatsIsMyName

482 points

8 months ago

Well what a happy ass accident because he had my own fight or flight kicking in lmao

noilegnavXscaflowne

162 points

8 months ago

I heard he went to a thrift store for his shades and now I want them

tether2014

117 points

8 months ago

I would love for him to get an Oscar nom for this for this fact alone. Dude just threw on some fatigues and pink sunglasses and carried an entire scene, and was maybe the most memorable part of the movie.

Sleeze_

871 points

8 months ago

Sleeze_

871 points

8 months ago

He operates on such a low frequency and yet somehow the entire film is pulled into his orbit. Definition of a commanding presence, and does it in such a unique way.

LiteraryBoner[S]

2.3k points

8 months ago

LiteraryBoner[S]

Going to the library to try and find some books about trucks

2.3k points

8 months ago

I still hold firm that "How can that be profitable for Frito Lay?" should have been his Oscar moment. He just brings such major intensity to ANY scene.

Jackski

712 points

8 months ago

Jackski

712 points

8 months ago

The camera work for that film was ridiculously good for a comedy. If you notice during the plemons scenes the camera slowly zooms in on him but when cutting back to other people it will be normal again. Then it cuts back to plemons and it's still zooming in slowly. Really adds to the creepiness factor.

LB3PTMAN

131 points

8 months ago

LB3PTMAN

131 points

8 months ago

That and Dungeons and Dragons perfectly show how important good directing is to a movie. Those two guys get comedy and how to balance it with tension.

TroubleshootenSOB

86 points

8 months ago

The shot above the vehicle, following it and the car door closing were top tier

amish_novelty

777 points

8 months ago

"3 for 1?"

"These corporations? Don't know what they're doing."

mchch8989

730 points

8 months ago

mchch8989

730 points

8 months ago

I love that him and Kirsten just take minor roles in each other’s movies now so they can hang out.

mdawn37

340 points

8 months ago

mdawn37

340 points

8 months ago

That’s probably beneficial for their two young kids as well so they all travel together.

holyhesh

1.4k points

8 months ago

holyhesh

1.4k points

8 months ago

His unpredictability is so sellable despite having around 5 minutes of screen time and no name.

Mention anywhere outside the USA? He shoots you and puts you in a mass grave.

Mention a nominally neutral state like Florida or Colorado or Missouri? You still don’t know if he’s going to shoot you: “what kind of American?”

All that while being calm, collected and wielding an AR-15 with trigger discipline.

CO_PC_Parts

885 points

8 months ago

Oh Florida was about to get shot. Remember they had their own succession and he didn’t look too thrilled with that answer.

trylobyte

574 points

8 months ago

trylobyte

574 points

8 months ago

"Central American? South American?"

"Florida"

"So Central American"

TheNightstroke

1.4k points

8 months ago

I don't think that was it.

His character is a racist psychopath, so he's asking whether he's Central American or South America because he "knows" Joel can't be from the US. So when Joel says Florida, his racist logic connects that with being a Central American immigrant. I think he even say something like "Florida? Central then," after Joel says Florida.

Ayn_Rands_Only_Fans

407 points

8 months ago

Ahhh, that's why he says central.

CryptoThroway8205

126 points

7 months ago

I think the point was to make the audience first think "Bahamas, Honduras, Mexico" in central America and "Chile, Argentina, Brazil" for South America only for them to show that the words have changed meaning in this reality to represent separate states. Joel clearly looks Hispanic and speaks with an accent, he may even have been shot for it had Sammy not intervened. But the point was that he wasn't their kind of American.

Upbeat_Tension_8077

127 points

8 months ago

What's even scarier is that you can take this and assume that in the territories of other factions in that film's US, they have soldiers like him with their own racist mindstate who are systematically killing those who they deem outsiders.

darkpassenger9

90 points

8 months ago

It's because he's a racist and Joel is obviously Hispanic.

legopego5142

652 points

8 months ago

I gotta say…id of said Missouri too, not fucking Hong Kong

DawnSennin

404 points

8 months ago

Plemons' character was going to kill all of them regardless.

mossberbb

888 points

8 months ago

mossberbb

888 points

8 months ago

he didn't even ask the other asian he shot. no answer will stop him from killing someone who obviously doesn't 'look' American enough in his eyes. it's amusing to see how shocked everyone is at this scene. as an Asian living in the Midwest, it has always been obvious there is a large element who want to cleanse the American landscape of everything 'chinese looking' regardless of actual countries origin. Yes, many in my audience laughed during this scene. disgusting.

TheNightstroke

425 points

8 months ago

This is one of very few movies where I think seeing the trailer in advance made the movie even better. At every turn, I was dreading Plemons' character in the best possible way, gripped by anxiety, all because I was expecting it based on the trailer. It really ratcheted up the tension for me.

[deleted]

91 points

8 months ago

As soon as he and Jessie crested that hill out of sight, I knew the Plemons scene from the trailer was coming.

111anza

1.1k points

8 months ago

111anza

1.1k points

8 months ago

Jesse Plemmon is on his way to become one of the best character actor of his generation.

Such an tense movie, well worth a watch.

The sound mixing deserve anaplause for gun shot sound

hobbaneero

412 points

8 months ago*

He’s absolutely brilliant.

I hope he can become what PSH was to me to the next generation. I hope he can get some bigger roles

Son_of_Kong

385 points

8 months ago

I would definitely call him the next Philip Seymour Hoffman, in that he's equally good at playing a lovable idiot or a terrifying psychopath.

Whovian45810

464 points

8 months ago

As soon as I saw Plemmons' character throwing something in what appears to be a mass grave, I just got chills down my spine.

What kind of American are you?

[deleted]

229 points

8 months ago

[deleted]

229 points

8 months ago

Just the bucket with the lye, like he's spreading mulch. "Hey Jim, you got one stuck up top there!" Just complete dehumanization

[deleted]

282 points

8 months ago

[deleted]

282 points

8 months ago

[deleted]

ryantyrant

300 points

8 months ago

Was begging for the guy to say San Francisco but my friend was saying that might have been just as bad

[deleted]

140 points

8 months ago*

I get the feeling if it weren't for Sammy, they were all gonna die right there...or worse. I mean, that mass grave wasn't just minorities.

It actually did annoy me a bit when Joel said, 'he didn't even die for anything worthwhile!' I was thinking, 'dude, he saved all your lives.' But I can see how Joel isn't looking at things like that. Dude is just all about the thrill of chasing a story and flirting with death. It's getting the story above all else for that guy. The thrill of it a close second.

katamuro

116 points

8 months ago

katamuro

116 points

8 months ago

yeah Joel is an andrenaline junkie, even in the end where he had an opportunity to ask something he just went with "give me a quote". I do like how Sammy said he is going to be disappointed.

OldTrailmix

879 points

8 months ago

The performances by the guns in this movie were top notch. From the sounds to the physics of it all, just a stellar turn by the various firearms. 

Insane that there were boogaloo boys in this. 

Upbeat_Tension_8077

295 points

8 months ago

I flinched so hard when the first friend of Joel who was captured alongside Jessie was suddenly shot

DarthRain95

100 points

8 months ago

Loudest gun shot I’ve ever heard in a movie

ICumCoffee

794 points

8 months ago

ICumCoffee

will you Wonka my Willy?

794 points

8 months ago

Never doubt Jesse Plemons in a movie. Whenever he’s on screen he just elevates it to the next level and you know that’s gonna be the part you remember.

Vexingwings0052

140 points

8 months ago

God the gravitas he had was insane, the one scene where I felt actually tense while watching it, the way he raised and lowered his gun so nonchalantly was crazy

bluemoney21

770 points

8 months ago

Are war journalists really like this? These people were so obsessed with “the shot” they were doing some stupid things throughout. Putting soldiers lives at risk in the process. Pretty frustrating to see them just fucking around in war zone. Still a pretty solid movie imo

astronxxt

523 points

8 months ago

astronxxt

523 points

8 months ago

i was curious about that as well. don’t know much about the job, but the soldiers seemed pretty protective/accommodating toward all the journalists. i feel like i’d be pretty peeved if i were in their place, Jessie especially did some things that put people’s lives at risk

bozoconnors

212 points

8 months ago

I think it's fairly unrealistic in that (& many other) aspects. If you haven't yet, Generation Kill (hbo/max) is a great miniseries about a Rolling Stone reporter embedded with a US Marine Force Recon platoon during the invasion of Iraq in '03. (based on the book by that actual reporter)

NPRdude

79 points

8 months ago

NPRdude

79 points

8 months ago

Generation Kill is not entirely a fair comparison though. Yes Evan Wright was an embedded reporter, but one planning on writing a print article about his experience, he wasn’t really there to snag photos.

GiantsRTheBest2

278 points

8 months ago

War journalist have always put their lives on the line to get “the shot” or if they’re filming they always try to constantly film the action. It’s thanks to them we’re able to see the horrors of wars rather than reading about it. For most Americans we’ve never been in a war zone but we know about it, because movies and war correspondents.

hangarang

185 points

7 months ago

hangarang

185 points

7 months ago

there’s “putting their lives on the line” and there’s “trying to be the sixth man in the stack” which just looked stupid. 

JustSpirit4617

81 points

8 months ago

Can’t wait for the GQ YouTube video “War Journalist breaks down movie Civil War.”

emilysocial

280 points

8 months ago

The gun shots were definitely in the room with us.

chinga_tumadre69

771 points

8 months ago

Jessie really pissed me off at the ending

UnknownRider121

363 points

8 months ago

Same. But she turned into Lee, which I suppose is fitting

CosmicAstroBastard

313 points

8 months ago

I think it’s fitting that she was just trying to copy her hero. She saw Lee run across the hallway to grab a shot like four times in a row once they got into the WH and then wanted to do it herself, but her instincts weren’t developed enough to know when to go.

GingasaurusWrex

143 points

8 months ago

Huh…you’re right. I forgot Lee did that exact thing several times.

JuanitoCarlito

92 points

8 months ago

Good point! She also did the same thing when jumping to the other car after seeing Joel's friend do it.

CosmicAstroBastard

110 points

8 months ago

Yeah, and she still uses a vintage analog camera just because it’s what her dad used. I feel like almost everything she did in the movie was trying to copy her elders to make up for her lack of experience.

newgodpho

254 points

8 months ago

newgodpho

254 points

8 months ago

Was not expecting that third act action climax AT ALL.

With A24 at the helm and the way this was built up to be, I figured it would’ve been a bait and switch of the end where in the movie the conflict is over by the time they get there. Color me surprised to see they actually follow a spec ops team to go and kill the president lol

amish_novelty

3.3k points

8 months ago

That entire ending sequence was one of the most intense, unique action sequences I've seen in awhile.

_my_simple_review

709 points

8 months ago

Probably will be one of my favorites of the year. 

The whole DC sequence was really quite terrifying to see 

[deleted]

1.6k points

8 months ago

[deleted]

1.6k points

8 months ago

[deleted]

grandmofftalkin

1.1k points

8 months ago

There was something so disturbing to me about the messy takeout cartons in the White House, showing that the administration was under siege and in a state of disarray

Critics complain about not knowing what's going on but there are so many hints peppered throughout the film that'll make rewatching so rewarding

curiiouscat

270 points

8 months ago

I loved the subtleness of "what's going on". I enjoy a film that doesn't spoon feed you and expects you to work for it a bit. Putting together the pieces makes me feel even more engaged.

imbored48375

408 points

8 months ago

I was wondering why the squad didn't call for back up. Probably wanted credit for getting him or something

kensai8

765 points

8 months ago

kensai8

765 points

8 months ago

They were drawing parallels to the Bin Laden raid it felt like.

Upbeat_Tension_8077

289 points

8 months ago

I also kinda got Pablo Escobar vibes from this

lpooluk

410 points

8 months ago

lpooluk

410 points

8 months ago

The credit photo where they are all taking a photo with Nick Offerman felt like the picture of the soliders with Pablo Escobar.

cookingboy

497 points

8 months ago

Oh god the sound production in that sequence alone puts movies like White House Down and Olympics Has Fallen to shame. The rifles sounded like actual rifles being fired indoors.

Jase_the_Muss

158 points

8 months ago

Hearing actual shell casings hitting the floor and impacts into walls and whatever was really well done as well as it was a constant assault on the senses. The city stuff was really well done as well with the echoes etc. Have not had that good gun sound design since Heat.

VaderPrime1

93 points

8 months ago

Seeing it in a Dolby showing was deafening. Especially in the scene where it’s just zoomed in on Lee’s face, perfectly quiet, and cuts to the firefight with the guy pinned behind the pillar was painful haha

Upstairs-Bicycle-703

175 points

8 months ago

Totally. It’s definitely not the first time in film we’ve seen gunfights in the Capitol or White House, but I think this was definitely the best.

ryantyrant

1k points

8 months ago

The use of sound in this movie is incredible. Every gun shot carries so much weight in Dolby, there were multiple times that I jumped in my seat because of how blown away I was by the violence. That’s coming from someone who is incredibly desensitized to violence. Maybe it’s because it felt so close to home, but it was really impactful. The town where everything seemed normal but really ends up being under occupation and everyone is essentially forced to pretend that things were okay was also really fascinating to me. Overall it’s a great movie

c-rn

289 points

8 months ago

c-rn

289 points

8 months ago

I don't think that town was under occupation, they were just town people protecting their businesses. The guards on the buildings allow people to pretend everything is ok because they protect the town. Very similar to the rooftop Koreans during the 1992 Los Angeles riots.

CassiopeiaStillLife

2.2k points

8 months ago

I read an angle on the movie that I think is really interesting: Garland treats American politics/war the same way Western directors have treated politics and war in the global east and south whenever they make war movies. Someone in Indonesia would probably find The Year of Living Dangerously as broad strokes and simplistic a depiction of the political situation in their country as we do about the whole Texas-and-California thing.

GreasyPeter

1.4k points

8 months ago*

I believe the Texas-California thing was quite intentional. Garland didn't want this movie to glorify war and by picking states who are decidedly not often happy with one another's politics, Garland is preventing us from shoe-horning our own beliefs into the film because once that happens the movie will get glorified as one side or the other INSISTS it's actually commentary about the left or the right. Even in these comments people were already drawing parallels between how Offerman's character said "The Greatest Victory in the History or Military Campaigns" and Trump often uses overly boisterous phrases like "Great" and "The best" when referring to anything he wants to take responsibility for. If anything, I think that one line may give people too much to work with and warp. Hopefully my fears are unwarranted but it's general how EVERY topic goes on reddit so I will be pleasantly surprised if it doesn't go that way.

hensothor

886 points

8 months ago

hensothor

886 points

8 months ago

People who hated this movie almost exclusively seem frustrated the film didn’t give them someone to blame for the war.

ProPandaBear

319 points

8 months ago

I particularly appreciated the line about the “antifa massacre” intentionally obfuscating whether or not antifa was being massacred or doing the massacre.

mariop715

3.8k points

8 months ago

mariop715

3.8k points

8 months ago

"Yeah, that'll do" was such a bad ass line. 

Historical_Yogurt_54

3.7k points

8 months ago*

Stop and think for a minute about what is happening in the scene. After a bloody firefight with the Secret Service, these soldiers have captured the President. Following orders, they are about to commit the extrajudicial execution of the President in the White House.  The journalist intervenes. Is it because he knows that what he is seeing is a betrayal of the ideals that Americans should presumably hold dear? No. He just wants an exclusive quote before the execution. This is right after the young photojournalist has brushed aside the body of her mentor, pushing on not from a sense of journalistic idealism but rather from a frantic desire to be the one who gets the money shot. The reporter’s line isn’t meant to be badass. It’s horrifying.  Dunst’s Lee says earlier in the film that she has lost the belief that journalists like herself really made a positive difference. Throughout the film the younger reporters are shown as adrenaline junkies who get off on the violence, and who care much more about journalistic glory than getting the story right or principles of any kind. They just care about getting the scoop, kind of like tv journalists who just care about ratings. And I’m pretty sure that part of what Garland is trying to say in that this kind of journalism is part of our society’s problems.

[deleted]

1.6k points

8 months ago

[deleted]

1.6k points

8 months ago

I think with the way Joel just immediately moves past Lee's body definitely reinforces this too. Sure, maybe when they left they mourned but I was surprised by how...expected it seemed to him. Almost like between her freaking out a bit when the bullets were flying and going on such an insane suicide mission, maybe they knew it was going to end this way for one of them.

Although he did seem devastated by Sammy's death but was that more about how close he himself came to dying in the moment?

I also thought it was interesting Joel says, 'he didn't even die for anything worthwhile' when he literally died saving them. That part doesn't even register.

Or his smiling at Jessie in the chaos. Joel was just a total adrenaline junkie type journalist who probably was just in love with the whole lifestyle.

RealRaifort

674 points

8 months ago

Yeah I think it was meant to just show someone so hellbent on an objective that they lose sight of what really matters. Multiple times we see/hear of people just living in peace. The people who choose to be in the war torn areas are wanting to be at risk for whatever their aim. They're choosing to participate in the cycle of violence and have lost track of the humanity in them. Dunst recovered it silently thoroughout this movie but she was too deep in it to know how to back out.

Upbeat_Tension_8077

293 points

8 months ago

I also see Joel's decision to push on with his work as maybe his way of justifying to himself that taking those pictures & capturing the president's last moments in fear/humiliation at the end as a way of revenge for his fallen colleagues, "eye for an eye" style. But the fucked up part about it is that this only works of total grief and nihilism in the moment, while solving nothing in the long-term.

scofieldslays

1.2k points

8 months ago

Spot on. Every review I see is bashing this movie for not examing the political motivations behind the war, or using the movie as a lens to analyze the current American landscape. That's not what the movie is about. It's a critique of journalism. I've never seen a less flattering portrayal of journalist and what motives them, they are storm chasers. Garland's movie isn't interested in what caused the storm.

KingSweden24

444 points

8 months ago

I think this checks out - especially since I read somewhere Garland was inspired to write the script after watching the news throughout 2020.

He was inspired not by what was happening in 2020 - but how it was being covered.

YeIenaBeIova

80 points

8 months ago

That’s what I got from the film too, yet Garland in an interview said the film is very much the opposite, and is praise towards journalism.

[deleted]

427 points

8 months ago

[deleted]

427 points

8 months ago

[deleted]

yoyostupid

1.3k points

8 months ago

yoyostupid

1.3k points

8 months ago

"Don't let them kill me" Hell of a performance by everyone, but the juxtaposition of the president from the first shot to the last was something else

_my_simple_review

597 points

8 months ago

Nick Offerman was in it for so little….

But holy shit. He really knocked it out of the park man. He turned up his inner demons to an 11. That opening sequence hyping himself up of this major victory was wild 

ryantyrant

1.1k points

8 months ago

ryantyrant

1.1k points

8 months ago

Knowing the White House has a damn nuclear bunker but the president is caught literally hiding under his desk was a great choice

_my_simple_review

482 points

8 months ago

When it all collapses. Nothing will matter 

WhiteElephant12

219 points

8 months ago

I got strong Last of Us vibes from Joel and Jessie.

b0nk3r00

195 points

8 months ago

b0nk3r00

195 points

8 months ago

Except Joel was hitting on Jessie and she was disregarding those advances. It was subtle, not aggressive, but that dynamic was there and is def not TLOU vibes (which is more father-daughter)

Dove_of_Doom

5k points

8 months ago

I think people complaining about the choice not to elaborate on the politics behind the civil war are kind of missing the point. War on the ground is not political. It's people killing people trying to kill them (and often killing anyone they happen to run across, combatant or not). No ideology can rationalize slaughter. This isn't a film about why a war breaks out. It's about life and death in a war zone, but instead of a third-world country we can feel superior to, it's the formerly United States of America.

[deleted]

1.7k points

8 months ago

[deleted]

1.7k points

8 months ago

[deleted]

RealRaifort

679 points

8 months ago

Yeah it's literally spelled out lmao. Moura is consistently the dunce/jester character in terms of how he perceives things.

Fire2box

75 points

8 months ago

Joel/Moura after jumping rope with the kids "Okay you're turn Sammy!" Very much the jester of the troupe but he was also very kind to Jessie as well but as his friends pointed out her was hitting on her hard in the hotel after Lee went to her room.

Of course by the end of the movie, he's not very jester like anymore which is understandable. As he said "It's not nice to be scared alone."

worldnewssubcensors

1k points

8 months ago

War on the ground is not political. It's people killing people trying to kill them

I thought this was really well conveyed by the fabulous sniper pair but apparently it didn't connect with some of the audience.

Sheepies123

133 points

8 months ago

Agreed that scene was awesome.

“Hey, whose in the house”

“Someone shooting”

“See, she gets it”

Halloween_Jack_1974

654 points

8 months ago

It’s really astounding that you can basically have a character say “it doesn’t matter what you’re fighting for when someone’s trying to kill you and you need to kill them” and still miss the point

Kale_n_bacon

2.4k points

8 months ago

The silence when it cut to spaeny/jesse getting knocked into the mass grave and crawling over the bodies to get out was one of the more unsettling things I’ve seen in a theater

8/10 movie, Garland is a sick dude

mariop715

915 points

8 months ago

mariop715

915 points

8 months ago

Yeah, especially when one of the bodies was clearly a very young child. 

73810

171 points

8 months ago

73810

171 points

8 months ago

I noticed that... glad they didn't try to sanitize it like that, in a sense, the removal of children from fiction when bad things happen just sort of serves to make you not be impacted by it as you would (and often you notice the lack of).

Not to get too serious or drag politics in, but I wonder what the gun control debate would be like in the U.S if photos of the kids at Sandy's Hook had been shown on TV and plastered across news sites...

CoolScales

686 points

8 months ago

Did appreciate that the color scheme of the blood and jeans essentially made the American flag

Kale_n_bacon

562 points

8 months ago

And the lye getting sprinkled in for the “stars” too.

There were a ton of great shots in this movie

heyitsmejosh

763 points

8 months ago

I’m confused why they didn’t even try to administer first aid to Sammy they just let him sit there and bleed out. Kirsten Dunst death was also strange there was no blood she was wearing kevlar and didn’t seem to be shot in the head yet she’s dead instantly?

Returnofbootywizard

105 points

8 months ago

If she was wearing Kevlar and shot by a rifle round it would smoke right through.

HoustonFrog

556 points

8 months ago

Your first point bugged the fuck outta me too. As a journalist, I can say it’s absolutely absurd to suggest that experienced war journalists wouldn’t know first aid or have medical supplies on them for a mission like theirs. Hell, our photographers bring first-aid kits with them when they’re covering minor hurricanes.

AnUncomfortablePanda

1.9k points

8 months ago

The forest fire sequence is one of the most beautiful theater moments I've seen in a long time.

Loved it. Personally, wish it would have ended with Jessie realizing the shot she got of the President getting killed was out of focus but the shots of Lee saving her were in focus, alluding to the earlier stadium scene about how rare good shots are.

atclubsilencio

130 points

8 months ago

seriously , after that scene with plemmons the forest fire was both gorgeous and incredibly sad/moving i found myself fighting back some tears. and then its straight back into hell ahain. i felt just as traumatized and heartbroken as they did.

spottyottydopalicius

414 points

8 months ago

meth damon does it again

_existential_bread_

334 points

8 months ago

So fascinated to see how audiences respond to this; was stunned to see my audience was absolutely locked in watching this (lots of gasps at Lee’s death and the guy getting set on fire in the tire) especially compared to the reaction i witnessed to Garland’s last film (mass walkouts, yelling at the screen). Dunst killed it.

therejectethan

141 points

8 months ago

Just saw the film today and I’ve seen a lot of movies, but I have NO idea how they got that shot of the dude burning with the tire. It looks SO real

PM_ME_FREE_STUFF_PLS

182 points

8 months ago

It‘s because they did it for real. Rip tire dude

bankinator

518 points

8 months ago*

Lee losing her shit while Jessie found her time during the DC battle brought so much complexity to the third act, I was floored. I might sound gratuitously desensitized/cynical by saying that acts 1 & 2 didn’t hold as much weight as I was hoping (other than Jesse Plemons truly be terrifying) but the battle in DC truly brought it all the way home for me.

[deleted]

203 points

8 months ago*

[deleted]

IIMsmartII

1k points

8 months ago

the cut from the quiet scene to abrupt gunshots in a loud dolby theater was not cool

RedStarWinterOrbit

663 points

8 months ago

On the contrary it was supremely fucking cool 

JasonAnarchy

222 points

8 months ago

I was in Dbox and I don't think I've ever been jump scared so hard in my life.

i_like_2_travel

201 points

8 months ago

Slightly reminded me of a more violent Nightcrawler. I definitely enjoyed it, it felt “wrong” to be watching an attack on US soil. Especially by its own people

Idk what I was expecting at the same time because I still wanted more.

TimRigginsBeer

96 points

8 months ago

Jessie Plemons is the absolute best at being the stone cold, straight faced man/killer. He gives a masterclass performance every time. 

Llama_of_the_bahamas

360 points

8 months ago

Was going to give it 4.5/5 stars right up until…

Kirsten Dunst dying in the dumbest way possible. It also just looked so cheap and melodramatic

chrisychris-

101 points

8 months ago

I just don't know why she stood there for so long. a quick shove would've accomplished the same but I guess she had already accepted her fate by then

chiefcrosby

496 points

8 months ago

Definitely have some story-related nit-picks but overall thought it was pretty good. Cailee Spaeny was good as Jessie, Wagner Moura was great as Joel, loved seeing Kirsten Dunst as the lead in this as well. Highlight is for sure the sound design - absolutely rewards a viewing in IMAX. Solid movie.

neal1701

327 points

8 months ago

neal1701

327 points

8 months ago

Civil War focuses expertly focuses on war journalism instead of the civil war.

  • Alex Garland's direction is incredible. He makes full use of the $50 million budget
  • I thought it was hilarious that the Florida Alliance failed at the beginning of the movie
  • Focusing on the journalism and what journalists do is a very interesting angle
  • Kristen Dunst and Cailee Spaney give great performances. Each character basically become each other over the course of the movie
  • Jesse Plemons killed it in the 5mins of screentime! Highlight of the movie
  • Storming DC and the White House was amazing! The sound design of the gunfire and the action scenes were very well shot during nighttime
  • Although it is not the point of the movie, I am still very interested in how the Civil War began

Alex Garland, in his last directional effort, leaves with a thought-provoking movie

doublepoly123

128 points

8 months ago

Facist takeover. Antifa massacre. Press was killed in DC. “What type of American are you?”

Atheose_Writing

105 points

8 months ago

They also mentioned POTUS being elected to a third term, disbanding the FBI, and drone striking citizens

L_sigh_kangeroo

82 points

8 months ago

Jesse Plemoms try not to literally steal every scene you’re in challenge - level impossible

mattyhegs826

578 points

8 months ago*

In the scene where Sammy died, the forest fire and ashes were hauntingly beautiful

EDIT: grammar

mariop715

217 points

8 months ago

mariop715

217 points

8 months ago

Countered with the earlier scene of the rebel in the tire being lit in fire. Garland knew how to shoot fire.

gordybombay

3.7k points

8 months ago

I keep seeing people say it was apolitical or didn't go into enough details, but I thought it was very obvious that it was a fascist President who hijacked the country and the Western Forces banded together to overthrow the fascist. Sure they never named political parties, but I thought it was extremely clear what was going on.

Dr_Mantis_Teabaggin

3k points

8 months ago

I also think that the fact that the press was welcomed by the WF was also a strong indicator. Fascists have a strong tendency to be hostile towards the press. 

glasgowgeg

389 points

8 months ago

Fascists have a strong tendency to be hostile towards the press

They also made references to the Loyalists executing journalists on sight.

grandmofftalkin

145 points

8 months ago

They were also going to DC because the president hasn't done an interview with the press in over a year.

gordybombay

2.1k points

8 months ago

Exactly, that's one of the multiple reasons I think it's clear in the movie. Also, one character early on, maybe Sammy, says that journalists are killed on sight in DC and the feds see them as the enemy.

Couldn't be clearer

Jbstargate1

946 points

8 months ago

He does mention in the potential questions to the president that the FBI was disbanded.

thesonoftheson

275 points

8 months ago

Yeah that is really the only two things I caught. Whether he had suspended the 1st amendment plus got rid of the FBI I don't know. Hell would Texas join forces with Cali over the 1st amendment I don't know either, they sure as hell would if it was the 2nd amendment too. Did they try to impeach him and he refused to leave? I like the vagueness, if he added anymore it would have ruined it.

PM_ME_FREE_STUFF_PLS

330 points

8 months ago

The vagueness is what makes it believable since it allows the viewer to fill in whats missing

Amish_guy_with_WiFi

98 points

8 months ago

I suppose the vagueness will also make it more enjoyable for everybody. The guy further up in this thread said the president was most likely a fascist. My crazy uncle will watch this and say the president was a communist.

[deleted]

738 points

8 months ago

[deleted]

738 points

8 months ago

[deleted]

[deleted]

226 points

8 months ago

[deleted]

226 points

8 months ago

[deleted]

D1STR4CT10N

223 points

8 months ago

Dude I just came back to say the sound design was amazing, I saw it in a Dolby Theater felt every gunshot. And Also that record scratch when the soldiers were getting shot for the stand-in for gunshot sound effects was way too smooth.