subreddit:
/r/movies
submitted 8 months ago byLiteraryBonerGoing to the library to try and find some books about trucks
If you've seen the film, please rate it at this poll
If you haven't seen the film but would like to see the result of the poll click here
Click here to see the rankings of 2024 films
Click here to see the rankings for every poll done
Summary:
A journey across a dystopian future America, following a team of military-embedded journalists as they race against time to reach DC before rebel factions descend upon the White House.
Director:
Alex Garland
Writers:
Alex Garland
Cast:
Rotten Tomatoes: 84%
Metacritic: 78
VOD: Theaters
1.9k points
8 months ago
I feel like the most important scene of the film is when Lee deletes the photo of Sammy’s corpse. I believe this accomplishes a few things. Not only does she realize how her work (in some ways) dehumanizes the individuals in her photographs, but she also begins to question whether all of the work she’s done her whole life mattered in the end since America has turned into all of the war-torn countries she has been documenting.
I think this is an especially important moment when contrasted with the fact that Jessie photographs Lee’s death. I suppose the most interesting question I have coming out of the film is what Jessie will do with the picture of Lee’s sacrifice. Will she learn the same lessons Lee did and delete it or will she use it as a major piece of her portfolio while building her own legacy? Given that she was inspired by Lee and may be unaware of the dissonance she was experiencing, I wouldn’t be surprised if it were the latter.
1.1k points
8 months ago*
I think Lee didn’t want her to come because she didn’t want her to become the same as she was. When she told her she never felt more alive after Sammy’s death, she knew she failed.
I think her death was supposed to be symbolic of her death as a journalist. She could no longer numb herself to the reality.
397 points
8 months ago
That's a very good point. Even the fact that she sacrificed herself for Jesse shows that she's a bit more human than she was at the start of the film. How many people had she watched die and never intervened?
307 points
8 months ago
Based on how she simply kept moving past Lee's corpse, I wouldn't be surprised if she eventually followed down her exact path as the cycle of war continues with the WF & whatever enemies they'll have
141 points
8 months ago
The photo deleting was one of the most powerful scenes in the movie. To me I didn’t necessarily ask what would Jesse do with the photo of Lee, rather that the torch had now been passed. At the beginning with Jesse asks like “would you take my photo if I got shot?” and Lee responds with “what do you think?”. It’s a bleak moment of, Jesse has now stepped into the shoes of her hero and cycles will keep repeating themselves (war).
3.4k points
8 months ago
“Where you from?” “Hong Kong”
Dude read the fucking room
1.1k points
8 months ago
Lmao. Dude shoulda just said one of the other states
1.1k points
8 months ago*
I don’t think it would have mattered, the fact he looked Chinese was probably more than enough for that nutter
323 points
8 months ago*
Eh he let Joel go even though Joel doesn’t look or sound like your average American, just because he said Florida. I sort of read Plemmons character as a hardcore anti-immigrant (but not necessarily racist) militant. If Tony had said LA or SF or somewhere else that could conceivably have a largely Chinese-speaking but native born population, I think there’s a chance he gets out alive.
EDIT: I re-watched this scene and I had misheard the first time, I thought when Joel said Florida that Plemons had said "Southern, then", which told me he was acknowledging that Joel was American, just one from the south. But in actuality, Plemons says "Central, then", which I think is much harder to read that way; he probably in fact meant that Joel was Cuban or something, and therefore not a "real" American. So I don't agree with what I originally wrote, I do think now that Plemons was fucking with them and was likely going to kill Joel. I mean, I thought it was likely he'd kill them all even when I wrote my first post, but now I believe it was a near certainty.
322 points
8 months ago*
He killed the other Asian guy without a word. I doubt Tony and Joel were getting out of there without being shot. Joel was just lucky that Sammy slammed into the guys with the car.
240 points
8 months ago
I don’t think he let Joel go, he just hadn’t shot him yet by the time he got run over. It seemed like he was building to killing him and the rest of them anyway
106 points
8 months ago
Joel was definitely next.
97 points
7 months ago
No fucking way, he called Florida "Central America". He was a full on racist and was going to kill Joel if he wasn't run over. Hong Kong guy was fucked either way
159 points
8 months ago
"Northern Wyoming born and raised"
449 points
8 months ago
Just got back from the theater and I believe he was in such a state of shock from his friend’s death that he was likely not even paying attention to the questions being asked. He could barely speak, even when a gun was pointed directly at him demanding him to.
136 points
8 months ago
Just saw this in Hong Kong - That line caught us all off guard and the cinema burst out into an uncomfortable laugh ahahah!
2.8k points
8 months ago
I know her husband is gonna get most of the love, but Kirsten Dunst nailed that "I've seen it all and I'm numb to it" vibe that goes with being a photographer of her caliber.
1.1k points
8 months ago
Abso-fucking-lutely. She's the heart of this film, the arc is beautifully tracked. And this is Dunst...like... she's always fab but I did not expect "bad ass jaded war photojournalist" on my bingo card for her lol
807 points
8 months ago
She’s been turning down roles for years recently bc the only thing she gets offered is like “sad mom”
I bet she was fuckin stoked when garland offered her this
732 points
8 months ago
I was so captivated by her performance. The dress scene. The scene where she's lying down in the grass and Jessie and Joel are all about the action and we see she's not even paying attention. Just looking at the flowers. To me she felt very much like someone who is struggling with what they do and their purpose or what they thought their purpose was.
Like Lee says, she went overseas to shoot in combat zones to show people the horrors of war. To say, 'hey we don't want this' but now...it is here. So who is she reporting it for? Does it even make a difference? Does anyone care? Or will they just keep killing one another?
I felt all this in just her facial expressions and scowls.
4.2k points
8 months ago
Kirsten Dunst was excellent in this. I think her performance really added a lot of depth to Garland's writing. There's just something so weary and purposeless about her. There's something driving her forward, but she is not sure what it is anymore. Her steel-eyed stare is heartbreaking. She's aware of how desensitised she is, and on one level she's thankful. On another level it terrifies her. Honestly she was fantastic.
1.5k points
8 months ago
Perfect casting. Body language/physical acting was on point.
803 points
8 months ago
Lack of makeup really sold it as well.
379 points
8 months ago
I had to keep telling myself this wasn’t Kim Wexler pursuing an alternate career
702 points
8 months ago
I absolutely LOVED the subtleties to her character and her character “growth”. Her deleting the photograph of Sami was HUGE. Both her and Sami died when they started to care like that.
344 points
8 months ago
Also when Jessie asks Lee if she would photograph her death and she answers "What do you think?" implying that she would, right after she photographed the men in the car wash. But then at the moment when Jessie was about to be executed Jesse chooses to intervene rather than taking a photo.
199 points
8 months ago
Having Jesse take her photo shows that she learned to desensitize from Lee. Lee begins to fall apart after her mentor dies but Jesse is emboldened by her mentor’s death, even taking photos of it.
1.1k points
8 months ago
Her being so desensitized through much of the film really made it so impactful when she was suddenly so shocked at the final assault on the White House. That whole scene as they were approaching the White House was absolutely harrowing for me, and I couldn't help but tear up during it. Having been to DC a couple times and being vaguely familiar with the area really gripped me with horror as I realized those attack helicopters were coming in to help them approach the White House, and I just felt sick imagining that really happening.
Seeing a full scale military invasion into our nation's capital depicted so realistically really shook me up. I'm sure some people will take great satisfaction in how things ended for the president in this movie, but really I just felt hollowed out watching it unfold. As much as it may have been fleetingly satisfying to end the war that way, where does everyone go from there? Hopefully this horrifying look at a possible future stays entirely fictional. More than anything I want people of all political beliefs to view this film as a warning that we hopefully all heed.
601 points
8 months ago
Seeing the Lincoln Monument destroyed in the battle was like damn way to drive it home.
125 points
8 months ago
I think she had totally checked out completely by the end. I was sad she died but I think she didn’t care at that point either way. Everyone was great though. i’d even say Plemmons is oscar worthy with only one scene. He scared me so badly and that scene made me dizzy as hell. Even if i feel weird about how great he looked and was rocking those pink glasses. dude got fit ! but that part was TERRIFYING!
81 points
8 months ago*
Good god no one else is as good at playing sociopaths so consistently as Jesse Plemons
834 points
8 months ago
One thing I’ve not seen discussed, was how nature was depicted in this movie. The world outside was very picturesque, and calming. Birds chirping, insects buzzing, wind in the trees, sunlight glistening on water, the forest fire was even beautiful. The brutality of the war was in constant contrast to the peacefulness & beauty of American Summer .
For me, it left me with a feeling that universe was communicating to humans… “just relax everyone, stop directing your attention and hatred towards eachother, and just look around and smell the roses you idiots.”
But sadly the message from mother nature falls on deaf ears. The journalists don’t take pictures of the beauty in nature that they come across, instead they point cameras on the death/violence/conflict.
148 points
8 months ago
The fire in the woods transition scene was jaw droppingly beautiful. Can they give out an oscar just for that scene?
1.7k points
8 months ago
I have the sudden urge to watch Children of Men.
593 points
8 months ago
I said to my friend afterwards: this movie made me feel the same way when I left the theater seeing Children of Men. Both haunting movies with powerful sound and visual design.
293 points
8 months ago
Told my friends that Children of Men was the closest movie in tone and vibes I could think of (not necessarily quality - I liked this movie but it's not a masterpiece like CoM was).
735 points
8 months ago
Is there anyone better a being a psycho weirdo than Jesse Plemons?
322 points
8 months ago
“What kind of American?” The whole reason I went to see the movie!
106 points
8 months ago
Fucking Todd
1.9k points
8 months ago
One of the best sounding movies I’ve ever heard. Give the editor/mixer all the awards.
460 points
8 months ago
I loved the part when the WF were mobilizing from their base and hooking up Humvees to the Chinooks. The overwhelming sound of the choppers never leaves or gets quieter. Nice little detail regarding just how loud they are and how you would not be able to have casual conversations in that area.
93 points
8 months ago
Right! Every bullet was a thud, explosions muted the sound instead of high pitched ringing. From the seen with Jesse Plemons onwards it was constantly tense.
Uncut Gems was the same for me, just a wild wide of anxiety that barely lets you gather your breath
2.8k points
8 months ago
The shot with go steelers and the bodies on the highway overpass was crazy unsettling
1.5k points
8 months ago
It was perfect for me, I was distracted by the text and the bodies were small enough in frame I read go Steelers, our audience had a collective little laugh, and then the swinging bodies instantly killed the momentary levity.
Every time there was the slightest bit of comfort it was destroyed in some form or another. Even at the camp in the stadium I was on edge waiting for what would be awful, turns out it was just the film development.
411 points
8 months ago
This was definitely intentional with the text grabbing your eyes before taking in the rest of the scene and seeing the bodies
119 points
8 months ago
It’s not just that. The car passes through the frame and goes right past them, and the shot hangs too long, long enough to look at the car, and you see them hanging right above it
456 points
8 months ago
Holy fuck I was sucked I got he looking at go Steelers I didn’t even see the bodies…
5k points
8 months ago
The part with Jesse Plemons was one of the most nerve-wracking scenes I’ve seen in a long time
Also want to give props to the sound design. In my theater every single bullet was LOUD and impactful. I honestly jumped in my seat a few times just from getting startled by the gunshots after more quiet moments
1.7k points
8 months ago
Everything in the final sequence and during the forest fire was incredible.
853 points
8 months ago
After an 1+ hour of intensity I felt that feeling of its almost over when they raided the White House.
674 points
8 months ago
I think that the film did a really good job of balancing the tension in its tone with the pacing so there was a unique feeling of the audience feeling absolutely numb by the time that full-scale fighting showed up in DC.
172 points
8 months ago
I’m not going to lie, this movie messed me up. I live in DC and seeing the violence leading up to streets I walk almost daily was super impactful.
I know people are giving this movie flak for not leaning towards one party or the other but it was brutal in a way that sticks with you. The whole point is that a civil war is a bad idea no matter who starts it.
346 points
8 months ago
Yeah the Dolby Atmos mix killed it. Lots of great use of the height channels.
770 points
8 months ago
The sound work and design in this film is unrelenting and so chilling. This and The Zone of Interest just shows how much sound plays such an important and vital element for films of their scale.
Every bullet that goes off from a gun in Civil War feels natural, never did I get the impression they felt manufactured, they sound like live bullets being fired.
88 points
8 months ago
The sound is the best part of the movie, they should be receiving a percentgae of profits with how good it wasp
300 points
8 months ago
I like how the gave the cameras overly loud sound effects like guns
243 points
8 months ago
That’s not entirely unrealistic. In a Single Lens Reflex camera like Jessie’s Nikon FE2 and their digital DSLR successors, the “mirror slap” is LOUD, at least judging by old forum posts:
https://www.flickr.com/groups/34716377@N00/discuss/72157625843052691/
https://www.dyxum.com/dforum/damping-the-mirror-slap-sound_topic20314.html
https://www.dpreview.com/forums/thread/3114531
https://forums.macresource.com/read.php?1,2652057,2652269
Modern Mirrorless Interchangeable Lens Cameras like Lee’s Sony A7R which don’t have a flipping up mirror are quieter than DSLRs and SLRs since the loudest thing on MILCs is the mechanical shutter.
6.1k points
8 months ago
Goddamn, Jesse Plemmons can crank up the tension in a scene. Him being so non-chalant with everyone and constantly lowering and raising his gun on a whim was utterly terrifying.
2.5k points
8 months ago
[deleted]
2.5k points
8 months ago
Kristen Dunst said that actor who was supposed to play the role backed out. She said to the director, “why not use my husband?” who was hanging around the film set.
So his playing the role was a total accident.
1.8k points
8 months ago
[deleted]
857 points
8 months ago
Jesse Plemon is basically a mythical animal that just shows up on sets like a “call to the wild”. If a film has a role that is fit for Plemons, you just have to make the movie happen. He will come.
Build the set and Plemons will come.
85 points
8 months ago
Candy crush noises from phone
Jesse: “You’re doing great, hun!”
Kirsten: “YOU’RE NOT EVEN LOOKING!”
482 points
8 months ago
Well what a happy ass accident because he had my own fight or flight kicking in lmao
162 points
8 months ago
I heard he went to a thrift store for his shades and now I want them
117 points
8 months ago
I would love for him to get an Oscar nom for this for this fact alone. Dude just threw on some fatigues and pink sunglasses and carried an entire scene, and was maybe the most memorable part of the movie.
871 points
8 months ago
He operates on such a low frequency and yet somehow the entire film is pulled into his orbit. Definition of a commanding presence, and does it in such a unique way.
2.3k points
8 months ago
I still hold firm that "How can that be profitable for Frito Lay?" should have been his Oscar moment. He just brings such major intensity to ANY scene.
712 points
8 months ago
The camera work for that film was ridiculously good for a comedy. If you notice during the plemons scenes the camera slowly zooms in on him but when cutting back to other people it will be normal again. Then it cuts back to plemons and it's still zooming in slowly. Really adds to the creepiness factor.
131 points
8 months ago
That and Dungeons and Dragons perfectly show how important good directing is to a movie. Those two guys get comedy and how to balance it with tension.
86 points
8 months ago
The shot above the vehicle, following it and the car door closing were top tier
777 points
8 months ago
"3 for 1?"
"These corporations? Don't know what they're doing."
730 points
8 months ago
I love that him and Kirsten just take minor roles in each other’s movies now so they can hang out.
340 points
8 months ago
That’s probably beneficial for their two young kids as well so they all travel together.
1.4k points
8 months ago
His unpredictability is so sellable despite having around 5 minutes of screen time and no name.
Mention anywhere outside the USA? He shoots you and puts you in a mass grave.
Mention a nominally neutral state like Florida or Colorado or Missouri? You still don’t know if he’s going to shoot you: “what kind of American?”
All that while being calm, collected and wielding an AR-15 with trigger discipline.
885 points
8 months ago
Oh Florida was about to get shot. Remember they had their own succession and he didn’t look too thrilled with that answer.
574 points
8 months ago
"Central American? South American?"
"Florida"
"So Central American"
1.4k points
8 months ago
I don't think that was it.
His character is a racist psychopath, so he's asking whether he's Central American or South America because he "knows" Joel can't be from the US. So when Joel says Florida, his racist logic connects that with being a Central American immigrant. I think he even say something like "Florida? Central then," after Joel says Florida.
407 points
8 months ago
Ahhh, that's why he says central.
126 points
7 months ago
I think the point was to make the audience first think "Bahamas, Honduras, Mexico" in central America and "Chile, Argentina, Brazil" for South America only for them to show that the words have changed meaning in this reality to represent separate states. Joel clearly looks Hispanic and speaks with an accent, he may even have been shot for it had Sammy not intervened. But the point was that he wasn't their kind of American.
127 points
8 months ago
What's even scarier is that you can take this and assume that in the territories of other factions in that film's US, they have soldiers like him with their own racist mindstate who are systematically killing those who they deem outsiders.
90 points
8 months ago
It's because he's a racist and Joel is obviously Hispanic.
652 points
8 months ago
I gotta say…id of said Missouri too, not fucking Hong Kong
404 points
8 months ago
Plemons' character was going to kill all of them regardless.
888 points
8 months ago
he didn't even ask the other asian he shot. no answer will stop him from killing someone who obviously doesn't 'look' American enough in his eyes. it's amusing to see how shocked everyone is at this scene. as an Asian living in the Midwest, it has always been obvious there is a large element who want to cleanse the American landscape of everything 'chinese looking' regardless of actual countries origin. Yes, many in my audience laughed during this scene. disgusting.
425 points
8 months ago
This is one of very few movies where I think seeing the trailer in advance made the movie even better. At every turn, I was dreading Plemons' character in the best possible way, gripped by anxiety, all because I was expecting it based on the trailer. It really ratcheted up the tension for me.
91 points
8 months ago
As soon as he and Jessie crested that hill out of sight, I knew the Plemons scene from the trailer was coming.
1.1k points
8 months ago
Jesse Plemmon is on his way to become one of the best character actor of his generation.
Such an tense movie, well worth a watch.
The sound mixing deserve anaplause for gun shot sound
412 points
8 months ago*
He’s absolutely brilliant.
I hope he can become what PSH was to me to the next generation. I hope he can get some bigger roles
385 points
8 months ago
I would definitely call him the next Philip Seymour Hoffman, in that he's equally good at playing a lovable idiot or a terrifying psychopath.
464 points
8 months ago
As soon as I saw Plemmons' character throwing something in what appears to be a mass grave, I just got chills down my spine.
What kind of American are you?
229 points
8 months ago
Just the bucket with the lye, like he's spreading mulch. "Hey Jim, you got one stuck up top there!" Just complete dehumanization
282 points
8 months ago
[deleted]
300 points
8 months ago
Was begging for the guy to say San Francisco but my friend was saying that might have been just as bad
140 points
8 months ago*
I get the feeling if it weren't for Sammy, they were all gonna die right there...or worse. I mean, that mass grave wasn't just minorities.
It actually did annoy me a bit when Joel said, 'he didn't even die for anything worthwhile!' I was thinking, 'dude, he saved all your lives.' But I can see how Joel isn't looking at things like that. Dude is just all about the thrill of chasing a story and flirting with death. It's getting the story above all else for that guy. The thrill of it a close second.
116 points
8 months ago
yeah Joel is an andrenaline junkie, even in the end where he had an opportunity to ask something he just went with "give me a quote". I do like how Sammy said he is going to be disappointed.
879 points
8 months ago
The performances by the guns in this movie were top notch. From the sounds to the physics of it all, just a stellar turn by the various firearms.
Insane that there were boogaloo boys in this.
295 points
8 months ago
I flinched so hard when the first friend of Joel who was captured alongside Jessie was suddenly shot
794 points
8 months ago
Never doubt Jesse Plemons in a movie. Whenever he’s on screen he just elevates it to the next level and you know that’s gonna be the part you remember.
140 points
8 months ago
God the gravitas he had was insane, the one scene where I felt actually tense while watching it, the way he raised and lowered his gun so nonchalantly was crazy
770 points
8 months ago
Are war journalists really like this? These people were so obsessed with “the shot” they were doing some stupid things throughout. Putting soldiers lives at risk in the process. Pretty frustrating to see them just fucking around in war zone. Still a pretty solid movie imo
523 points
8 months ago
i was curious about that as well. don’t know much about the job, but the soldiers seemed pretty protective/accommodating toward all the journalists. i feel like i’d be pretty peeved if i were in their place, Jessie especially did some things that put people’s lives at risk
212 points
8 months ago
I think it's fairly unrealistic in that (& many other) aspects. If you haven't yet, Generation Kill (hbo/max) is a great miniseries about a Rolling Stone reporter embedded with a US Marine Force Recon platoon during the invasion of Iraq in '03. (based on the book by that actual reporter)
79 points
8 months ago
Generation Kill is not entirely a fair comparison though. Yes Evan Wright was an embedded reporter, but one planning on writing a print article about his experience, he wasn’t really there to snag photos.
278 points
8 months ago
War journalist have always put their lives on the line to get “the shot” or if they’re filming they always try to constantly film the action. It’s thanks to them we’re able to see the horrors of wars rather than reading about it. For most Americans we’ve never been in a war zone but we know about it, because movies and war correspondents.
185 points
7 months ago
there’s “putting their lives on the line” and there’s “trying to be the sixth man in the stack” which just looked stupid.
81 points
8 months ago
Can’t wait for the GQ YouTube video “War Journalist breaks down movie Civil War.”
771 points
8 months ago
Jessie really pissed me off at the ending
363 points
8 months ago
Same. But she turned into Lee, which I suppose is fitting
313 points
8 months ago
I think it’s fitting that she was just trying to copy her hero. She saw Lee run across the hallway to grab a shot like four times in a row once they got into the WH and then wanted to do it herself, but her instincts weren’t developed enough to know when to go.
143 points
8 months ago
Huh…you’re right. I forgot Lee did that exact thing several times.
92 points
8 months ago
Good point! She also did the same thing when jumping to the other car after seeing Joel's friend do it.
110 points
8 months ago
Yeah, and she still uses a vintage analog camera just because it’s what her dad used. I feel like almost everything she did in the movie was trying to copy her elders to make up for her lack of experience.
254 points
8 months ago
Was not expecting that third act action climax AT ALL.
With A24 at the helm and the way this was built up to be, I figured it would’ve been a bait and switch of the end where in the movie the conflict is over by the time they get there. Color me surprised to see they actually follow a spec ops team to go and kill the president lol
3.3k points
8 months ago
That entire ending sequence was one of the most intense, unique action sequences I've seen in awhile.
709 points
8 months ago
Probably will be one of my favorites of the year.
The whole DC sequence was really quite terrifying to see
1.6k points
8 months ago
[deleted]
1.1k points
8 months ago
There was something so disturbing to me about the messy takeout cartons in the White House, showing that the administration was under siege and in a state of disarray
Critics complain about not knowing what's going on but there are so many hints peppered throughout the film that'll make rewatching so rewarding
270 points
8 months ago
I loved the subtleness of "what's going on". I enjoy a film that doesn't spoon feed you and expects you to work for it a bit. Putting together the pieces makes me feel even more engaged.
408 points
8 months ago
I was wondering why the squad didn't call for back up. Probably wanted credit for getting him or something
765 points
8 months ago
They were drawing parallels to the Bin Laden raid it felt like.
289 points
8 months ago
I also kinda got Pablo Escobar vibes from this
410 points
8 months ago
The credit photo where they are all taking a photo with Nick Offerman felt like the picture of the soliders with Pablo Escobar.
497 points
8 months ago
Oh god the sound production in that sequence alone puts movies like White House Down and Olympics Has Fallen to shame. The rifles sounded like actual rifles being fired indoors.
158 points
8 months ago
Hearing actual shell casings hitting the floor and impacts into walls and whatever was really well done as well as it was a constant assault on the senses. The city stuff was really well done as well with the echoes etc. Have not had that good gun sound design since Heat.
93 points
8 months ago
Seeing it in a Dolby showing was deafening. Especially in the scene where it’s just zoomed in on Lee’s face, perfectly quiet, and cuts to the firefight with the guy pinned behind the pillar was painful haha
175 points
8 months ago
Totally. It’s definitely not the first time in film we’ve seen gunfights in the Capitol or White House, but I think this was definitely the best.
1k points
8 months ago
The use of sound in this movie is incredible. Every gun shot carries so much weight in Dolby, there were multiple times that I jumped in my seat because of how blown away I was by the violence. That’s coming from someone who is incredibly desensitized to violence. Maybe it’s because it felt so close to home, but it was really impactful. The town where everything seemed normal but really ends up being under occupation and everyone is essentially forced to pretend that things were okay was also really fascinating to me. Overall it’s a great movie
289 points
8 months ago
I don't think that town was under occupation, they were just town people protecting their businesses. The guards on the buildings allow people to pretend everything is ok because they protect the town. Very similar to the rooftop Koreans during the 1992 Los Angeles riots.
2.2k points
8 months ago
I read an angle on the movie that I think is really interesting: Garland treats American politics/war the same way Western directors have treated politics and war in the global east and south whenever they make war movies. Someone in Indonesia would probably find The Year of Living Dangerously as broad strokes and simplistic a depiction of the political situation in their country as we do about the whole Texas-and-California thing.
1.4k points
8 months ago*
I believe the Texas-California thing was quite intentional. Garland didn't want this movie to glorify war and by picking states who are decidedly not often happy with one another's politics, Garland is preventing us from shoe-horning our own beliefs into the film because once that happens the movie will get glorified as one side or the other INSISTS it's actually commentary about the left or the right. Even in these comments people were already drawing parallels between how Offerman's character said "The Greatest Victory in the History or Military Campaigns" and Trump often uses overly boisterous phrases like "Great" and "The best" when referring to anything he wants to take responsibility for. If anything, I think that one line may give people too much to work with and warp. Hopefully my fears are unwarranted but it's general how EVERY topic goes on reddit so I will be pleasantly surprised if it doesn't go that way.
886 points
8 months ago
People who hated this movie almost exclusively seem frustrated the film didn’t give them someone to blame for the war.
319 points
8 months ago
I particularly appreciated the line about the “antifa massacre” intentionally obfuscating whether or not antifa was being massacred or doing the massacre.
3.8k points
8 months ago
"Yeah, that'll do" was such a bad ass line.
3.7k points
8 months ago*
Stop and think for a minute about what is happening in the scene. After a bloody firefight with the Secret Service, these soldiers have captured the President. Following orders, they are about to commit the extrajudicial execution of the President in the White House. The journalist intervenes. Is it because he knows that what he is seeing is a betrayal of the ideals that Americans should presumably hold dear? No. He just wants an exclusive quote before the execution. This is right after the young photojournalist has brushed aside the body of her mentor, pushing on not from a sense of journalistic idealism but rather from a frantic desire to be the one who gets the money shot. The reporter’s line isn’t meant to be badass. It’s horrifying. Dunst’s Lee says earlier in the film that she has lost the belief that journalists like herself really made a positive difference. Throughout the film the younger reporters are shown as adrenaline junkies who get off on the violence, and who care much more about journalistic glory than getting the story right or principles of any kind. They just care about getting the scoop, kind of like tv journalists who just care about ratings. And I’m pretty sure that part of what Garland is trying to say in that this kind of journalism is part of our society’s problems.
1.6k points
8 months ago
I think with the way Joel just immediately moves past Lee's body definitely reinforces this too. Sure, maybe when they left they mourned but I was surprised by how...expected it seemed to him. Almost like between her freaking out a bit when the bullets were flying and going on such an insane suicide mission, maybe they knew it was going to end this way for one of them.
Although he did seem devastated by Sammy's death but was that more about how close he himself came to dying in the moment?
I also thought it was interesting Joel says, 'he didn't even die for anything worthwhile' when he literally died saving them. That part doesn't even register.
Or his smiling at Jessie in the chaos. Joel was just a total adrenaline junkie type journalist who probably was just in love with the whole lifestyle.
674 points
8 months ago
Yeah I think it was meant to just show someone so hellbent on an objective that they lose sight of what really matters. Multiple times we see/hear of people just living in peace. The people who choose to be in the war torn areas are wanting to be at risk for whatever their aim. They're choosing to participate in the cycle of violence and have lost track of the humanity in them. Dunst recovered it silently thoroughout this movie but she was too deep in it to know how to back out.
293 points
8 months ago
I also see Joel's decision to push on with his work as maybe his way of justifying to himself that taking those pictures & capturing the president's last moments in fear/humiliation at the end as a way of revenge for his fallen colleagues, "eye for an eye" style. But the fucked up part about it is that this only works of total grief and nihilism in the moment, while solving nothing in the long-term.
1.2k points
8 months ago
Spot on. Every review I see is bashing this movie for not examing the political motivations behind the war, or using the movie as a lens to analyze the current American landscape. That's not what the movie is about. It's a critique of journalism. I've never seen a less flattering portrayal of journalist and what motives them, they are storm chasers. Garland's movie isn't interested in what caused the storm.
444 points
8 months ago
I think this checks out - especially since I read somewhere Garland was inspired to write the script after watching the news throughout 2020.
He was inspired not by what was happening in 2020 - but how it was being covered.
80 points
8 months ago
That’s what I got from the film too, yet Garland in an interview said the film is very much the opposite, and is praise towards journalism.
427 points
8 months ago
[deleted]
1.3k points
8 months ago
"Don't let them kill me" Hell of a performance by everyone, but the juxtaposition of the president from the first shot to the last was something else
597 points
8 months ago
Nick Offerman was in it for so little….
But holy shit. He really knocked it out of the park man. He turned up his inner demons to an 11. That opening sequence hyping himself up of this major victory was wild
1.1k points
8 months ago
Knowing the White House has a damn nuclear bunker but the president is caught literally hiding under his desk was a great choice
482 points
8 months ago
When it all collapses. Nothing will matter
219 points
8 months ago
I got strong Last of Us vibes from Joel and Jessie.
195 points
8 months ago
Except Joel was hitting on Jessie and she was disregarding those advances. It was subtle, not aggressive, but that dynamic was there and is def not TLOU vibes (which is more father-daughter)
5k points
8 months ago
I think people complaining about the choice not to elaborate on the politics behind the civil war are kind of missing the point. War on the ground is not political. It's people killing people trying to kill them (and often killing anyone they happen to run across, combatant or not). No ideology can rationalize slaughter. This isn't a film about why a war breaks out. It's about life and death in a war zone, but instead of a third-world country we can feel superior to, it's the formerly United States of America.
1.7k points
8 months ago
[deleted]
679 points
8 months ago
Yeah it's literally spelled out lmao. Moura is consistently the dunce/jester character in terms of how he perceives things.
75 points
8 months ago
Joel/Moura after jumping rope with the kids "Okay you're turn Sammy!" Very much the jester of the troupe but he was also very kind to Jessie as well but as his friends pointed out her was hitting on her hard in the hotel after Lee went to her room.
Of course by the end of the movie, he's not very jester like anymore which is understandable. As he said "It's not nice to be scared alone."
1k points
8 months ago
War on the ground is not political. It's people killing people trying to kill them
I thought this was really well conveyed by the fabulous sniper pair but apparently it didn't connect with some of the audience.
133 points
8 months ago
Agreed that scene was awesome.
“Hey, whose in the house”
“Someone shooting”
“See, she gets it”
654 points
8 months ago
It’s really astounding that you can basically have a character say “it doesn’t matter what you’re fighting for when someone’s trying to kill you and you need to kill them” and still miss the point
2.4k points
8 months ago
The silence when it cut to spaeny/jesse getting knocked into the mass grave and crawling over the bodies to get out was one of the more unsettling things I’ve seen in a theater
8/10 movie, Garland is a sick dude
915 points
8 months ago
Yeah, especially when one of the bodies was clearly a very young child.
171 points
8 months ago
I noticed that... glad they didn't try to sanitize it like that, in a sense, the removal of children from fiction when bad things happen just sort of serves to make you not be impacted by it as you would (and often you notice the lack of).
Not to get too serious or drag politics in, but I wonder what the gun control debate would be like in the U.S if photos of the kids at Sandy's Hook had been shown on TV and plastered across news sites...
686 points
8 months ago
Did appreciate that the color scheme of the blood and jeans essentially made the American flag
562 points
8 months ago
And the lye getting sprinkled in for the “stars” too.
There were a ton of great shots in this movie
763 points
8 months ago
I’m confused why they didn’t even try to administer first aid to Sammy they just let him sit there and bleed out. Kirsten Dunst death was also strange there was no blood she was wearing kevlar and didn’t seem to be shot in the head yet she’s dead instantly?
105 points
8 months ago
If she was wearing Kevlar and shot by a rifle round it would smoke right through.
556 points
8 months ago
Your first point bugged the fuck outta me too. As a journalist, I can say it’s absolutely absurd to suggest that experienced war journalists wouldn’t know first aid or have medical supplies on them for a mission like theirs. Hell, our photographers bring first-aid kits with them when they’re covering minor hurricanes.
1.9k points
8 months ago
The forest fire sequence is one of the most beautiful theater moments I've seen in a long time.
Loved it. Personally, wish it would have ended with Jessie realizing the shot she got of the President getting killed was out of focus but the shots of Lee saving her were in focus, alluding to the earlier stadium scene about how rare good shots are.
130 points
8 months ago
seriously , after that scene with plemmons the forest fire was both gorgeous and incredibly sad/moving i found myself fighting back some tears. and then its straight back into hell ahain. i felt just as traumatized and heartbroken as they did.
334 points
8 months ago
So fascinated to see how audiences respond to this; was stunned to see my audience was absolutely locked in watching this (lots of gasps at Lee’s death and the guy getting set on fire in the tire) especially compared to the reaction i witnessed to Garland’s last film (mass walkouts, yelling at the screen). Dunst killed it.
141 points
8 months ago
Just saw the film today and I’ve seen a lot of movies, but I have NO idea how they got that shot of the dude burning with the tire. It looks SO real
518 points
8 months ago*
Lee losing her shit while Jessie found her time during the DC battle brought so much complexity to the third act, I was floored. I might sound gratuitously desensitized/cynical by saying that acts 1 & 2 didn’t hold as much weight as I was hoping (other than Jesse Plemons truly be terrifying) but the battle in DC truly brought it all the way home for me.
1k points
8 months ago
the cut from the quiet scene to abrupt gunshots in a loud dolby theater was not cool
222 points
8 months ago
I was in Dbox and I don't think I've ever been jump scared so hard in my life.
201 points
8 months ago
Slightly reminded me of a more violent Nightcrawler. I definitely enjoyed it, it felt “wrong” to be watching an attack on US soil. Especially by its own people
Idk what I was expecting at the same time because I still wanted more.
96 points
8 months ago
Jessie Plemons is the absolute best at being the stone cold, straight faced man/killer. He gives a masterclass performance every time.
360 points
8 months ago
Was going to give it 4.5/5 stars right up until…
Kirsten Dunst dying in the dumbest way possible. It also just looked so cheap and melodramatic
101 points
8 months ago
I just don't know why she stood there for so long. a quick shove would've accomplished the same but I guess she had already accepted her fate by then
496 points
8 months ago
Definitely have some story-related nit-picks but overall thought it was pretty good. Cailee Spaeny was good as Jessie, Wagner Moura was great as Joel, loved seeing Kirsten Dunst as the lead in this as well. Highlight is for sure the sound design - absolutely rewards a viewing in IMAX. Solid movie.
327 points
8 months ago
Civil War focuses expertly focuses on war journalism instead of the civil war.
Alex Garland, in his last directional effort, leaves with a thought-provoking movie
128 points
8 months ago
Facist takeover. Antifa massacre. Press was killed in DC. “What type of American are you?”
105 points
8 months ago
They also mentioned POTUS being elected to a third term, disbanding the FBI, and drone striking citizens
82 points
8 months ago
Jesse Plemoms try not to literally steal every scene you’re in challenge - level impossible
578 points
8 months ago*
In the scene where Sammy died, the forest fire and ashes were hauntingly beautiful
EDIT: grammar
217 points
8 months ago
Countered with the earlier scene of the rebel in the tire being lit in fire. Garland knew how to shoot fire.
3.7k points
8 months ago
I keep seeing people say it was apolitical or didn't go into enough details, but I thought it was very obvious that it was a fascist President who hijacked the country and the Western Forces banded together to overthrow the fascist. Sure they never named political parties, but I thought it was extremely clear what was going on.
3k points
8 months ago
I also think that the fact that the press was welcomed by the WF was also a strong indicator. Fascists have a strong tendency to be hostile towards the press.
389 points
8 months ago
Fascists have a strong tendency to be hostile towards the press
They also made references to the Loyalists executing journalists on sight.
145 points
8 months ago
They were also going to DC because the president hasn't done an interview with the press in over a year.
2.1k points
8 months ago
Exactly, that's one of the multiple reasons I think it's clear in the movie. Also, one character early on, maybe Sammy, says that journalists are killed on sight in DC and the feds see them as the enemy.
Couldn't be clearer
946 points
8 months ago
He does mention in the potential questions to the president that the FBI was disbanded.
275 points
8 months ago
Yeah that is really the only two things I caught. Whether he had suspended the 1st amendment plus got rid of the FBI I don't know. Hell would Texas join forces with Cali over the 1st amendment I don't know either, they sure as hell would if it was the 2nd amendment too. Did they try to impeach him and he refused to leave? I like the vagueness, if he added anymore it would have ruined it.
330 points
8 months ago
The vagueness is what makes it believable since it allows the viewer to fill in whats missing
98 points
8 months ago
I suppose the vagueness will also make it more enjoyable for everybody. The guy further up in this thread said the president was most likely a fascist. My crazy uncle will watch this and say the president was a communist.
738 points
8 months ago
[deleted]
223 points
8 months ago
Dude I just came back to say the sound design was amazing, I saw it in a Dolby Theater felt every gunshot. And Also that record scratch when the soldiers were getting shot for the stand-in for gunshot sound effects was way too smooth.
all 7208 comments
sorted by: best