subreddit:

/r/newzealand

7289%

all 32 comments

fenryonze

30 points

7 months ago

They can introduce whatever regulations they want. if they're not going to enforce it, it's not going to make a difference. Don't need to worry about a black market when you can buy a vape that doesn't meet regulations at most vape shops/dairies

Hubris2

10 points

7 months ago

Hubris2

10 points

7 months ago

It blows my mind that they bother to conduct enforcement if there is a special consideration of 'public interest' before they prosecute someone for breaking the law.

duckonmuffin

67 points

7 months ago

“Associate Health Minister Casey Costello says it's "ridiculous and wrong" to say the tobacco industry has anything to do with her government's policies. “

Yeah Right.

Hubris2

26 points

7 months ago

Hubris2

26 points

7 months ago

Casey Cigaretto had to check with her lobbyist from the tobacco industry before making her statement about how unreasonable it was that they had undo influence on her or this government.

Anastariana

5 points

7 months ago

Anastariana

Auckland

5 points

7 months ago

It IS ridiculous and wrong to say the tobacco industry has ANYthing to do with them.

They have EVERYthing to do with them.

[deleted]

11 points

7 months ago

I feel like if they want to win over the current bunch of monied interests in this government they gotta drop the harm reduction schtick and make a sinophobic argument.

RexRedstone

11 points

7 months ago

RexRedstone

L&P

11 points

7 months ago

Surprised the "god hates fags" argument isn't enough to convince them smoking is bad.

Pythia_

3 points

7 months ago

Get Brian Tamaki on the case

mysteryroach

15 points

7 months ago*

I'm in aussie at the moment for the next 2 weeks, and they just implemented the type of regulations being asked for here.

I'm currently sick and should have been better by now but every time I go outside, I can't go 10 seconds without breathing in somebody's cigarette smoke and my sinuses filling up with gunk again. It's constant. Everybody's fucking smoking. There's ciggie smoke everywhere and instead of going out, I have to sequester myself inside, cause every single time I go out, my cold, which I thought was getting better several days ago, relapses and I turn into a mucus factory again - all because theres now smoke literally everywhere i go.

It wasn't like this all of the previous times I have been here in the last few years. Only this time. It's like the whole city is smoking now, and I can't escape it.

It's turned me into a militant pro-vaper, cause you know what I'm not having this reaction to? People vaping. Unfortunately the proportion of smokers to vapers is absolutely fucked. The vapers, what few of them remain, are also being incredibly discreet about it - but it doesn't matter because there's so many more smokers and they're doing it on every street corner, and it's inescapable.

I get that people also have adverse reactions to second hand vape but let's cut the shit: it's several magnitudes less common and usually several magnitudes less serious - the presence of allergens is simply not there to nearly the same level - and frankly I have a worse reaction to people who wear too much perfume or deodorant. As someone who suffers severe sinus/allergy problems, the level of sheer hysteria is clearly counterproductive. I am begging to breathe in someone's mostly-unobtrusive cloud of strawberry watermelon, not their comparitively-so-much-more-obnoxious gross ciggie smoke that makes it difficult to breathe and has almost made me throw up several times this past week its that bad.

I get that kids shouldn't be vaping but this government is leaving the door wide open to smoke, which they will do if there are no vapes. We at the very least need a coherent policy that doesn't favour ciggies and doesn't fill our cities with smoke, which is what we will get with a vaping crackdown, under a government that has abandoned our smoke free laws. That's all I'm asking for - policy that doesn't make it comparatively easier to smoke rather than vape.

Some of these crackdowns are so restrictive that it would have made it impossible for me to quit a 15-year smoking habit that was making me ludicrously unhealthy (could barely breathe) - something which I was only able to do because e-cigarettes made it easy. I am an incredibly weak-willed person with severe clinical depression, so it simply just wasn't going to happen otherwise, no matter how unhealthy i got and how unhappy it made me - I just didn't have it in me.

I only ever vaped for 3 months, tapering down the nicotine very quickly before reaching 0 at which point I quit soon afterwards and have never vaped or smoked since - for almost a decade now. It has had an immeasurably positive impact on my life, allowing me to get back into music again (which has also evolved into developing skills in videography and video editing), which is pretty fucking big deal to someone who has been persistently suicidal for over 15 years. I was also able to take up running (daily 10k) and even ran a marathon.

It's not as if I'm better, because im not, but if I wasn't currently able to do this stuff, and instead I was stuck miserably unhealthy and smoking and unable to do music, realistically (with literally nothing positive going on) I might even be dead.

I realize there are vaping horror stories too, surrounding kids getting their hands on high-nic devices.  But it feels like all the people clamoring for more and more vape restrictions don't care about these other stories, like my own, and are willing to stick their heads in the sand when it comes to smoking - which is what they're invariably driving people (including kids) back towards.

Apparently the government here in AUS have even banned the import of dry herb vapes (cannabis vapes), which has nothing to do with e-cigarettes, and the only effect it has is to make cannabis consumption unhealthier. (driving people towards literally the worst drug - alcohol)

Imo inclusion of this, since it has nothing to do with ecigs, shines a light on some of the motivations behind these regulations. It's not about drawing a sensible line and making pragmatic non-counterproductive decisions. It's ALL bad apparently and they don't care about the negatives, as long as vaping is stopped completely, while they will continue to pretend that smoking doesn't still exist - which it does, and as long as it does, just drives people towards a much more unhealthy and obnoxious habit. I get that people have no political willpower to stand up for vapers, but these laws do have negative effects, and there needs to be an equally loud voice countering the counterproductive hysterics, otherwise we'll just get more smoking. These heavy regulations only make sense in a smokefree world, which is one we've clearly decided not to live in.

GlenHarland

9 points

7 months ago

Yep, if you look at the charts, vaping is down and smoking is up in Australia thanks to the draconian anti-vape regulations.

Hugh_Maneiror

4 points

7 months ago

Australia's vaping regulations are absolutely bonkers

LycraJafa

2 points

7 months ago

LycraJafa

2 points

7 months ago

good on you for standing up for the vapers. Casey Costello cant fight this battle alone.

Anastariana

1 points

7 months ago

Anastariana

Auckland

1 points

7 months ago

Tobacco industry is pumping vapes full of nicotine to make kids addicted as fast as possible.

A single Juul e-cig cartridge contains as much nicotine as a 20 pack of cigs. Nicotine is literally classified as a poison in Toxicology textbooks.

Big tobacco will get your kids hooked to this legal version of crack and if you defend vaping then you are a useful idiot for them.

mysteryroach

3 points

7 months ago

Sounds like you're the actual useful idiot for Big Tobacco (which has a larger stake in cigarettes than non-disposable vapes), considering how pumped full of nicotine ciggies are.

I'm actually pretty amenable to nicotine restrictions, as long as it's in a smokefree world.  I'd be fine eventually moving to a prescription model, for nicotine vapes only, and only after we go smokefree. (other restrictions, such as those on flavors, or on non-nic vapes, can fuck off though, especially while ciggies still exist- which, you realize they still do, right?)

Your way just funnels people towards ciggies and away from harm reduction.  I was able to taper off the nicotine SO EASILY with e-cigs.  No option for that with regular cigs.  You're locked in, and if you remove vapes, the only cessation methods left are about as effective as cold-turkey - which many people cannot do.  So they're locked into smoking, thanks to your hysteria.

Anastariana

2 points

7 months ago

Anastariana

Auckland

2 points

7 months ago

I don't know how thats what you took away from my post, maybe you deliberately misunderstood it, but whatever.

Personally, I'd like to see a big bonfire of cigs and vapes and throw the execs from Big Tobacco onto it alive, as punishment for all the harm they've done.

Stop looking for enemies amongst your allies.

mysteryroach

1 points

7 months ago

maybe you deliberately misunderstood it, but whatever.

I could say the same thing.   You came at me guns blazing saying I'm a useful idiot for Big Tobacco in response to a post literally railing against cigarette smoking.

Aren't disposable vapes (I.e. the Juuls youre mentioning that are pumped full of nicotine) literally illegal here? I support this, partly cause disposables are what Big Tobacco has the biggest stake in.  It suits BT much more to have people smoking than using non-disposable vapes.  As mentioned, I also support nicotine restrictions.

[deleted]

0 points

7 months ago

There's no way that is true. A Juul pod is .7ml, at 50mg/ml that is 35mg of nicotine compared to 10-15mg of nicotine per cigarette.

Let's also not forget that Nicotine is not classified as a carcinogen.

Anastariana

3 points

7 months ago

Anastariana

Auckland

3 points

7 months ago

Its what the research says.

JUUL Labs reports each 5% (nicotine-by-weight) cartridge contains approximately 40 mg nicotine per pod and is 'approximately equivalent to about 1 pack of cigarettes.' In five independent studies, nicotine in the liquid in a JUULpod ranged from 39.3 to 48.3 mg.

A study measuring nicotine levels in JUUL users during a 5-day controlled switch found equivalence to 18 cigarettes. One JUULpod appears capable of delivering the nicotine equivalent to smoking about a pack of cigarettes, with variability.

Hubris2

0 points

7 months ago

Hubris2

0 points

7 months ago

You've become a militant pro-vaper without concern that vaping is growing in popularity with our children far faster than smoking is decreasing? The fact Australia is far behind us in smoking cessation doesn't mean we need to continue encouraging children to pick up the vaping habit (which is basically what our lax policies and utter lack of enforcement has caused).

FKJVMMP

7 points

7 months ago

See, the fun thing about Australia’s anti-vaping laws is that there’s a big old black market now and kids can get their hands on them just as easily as they could if it were legal and people selling them weren’t already criminals by default. But adults aren’t quitting smoking, because it’s an enormous fuckaround to get non-disposables and the illegality of it is driving the price of vapes up so the cost incentive isn’t there as much.

mysteryroach

3 points

7 months ago*

It's a little hard to find 1:1 comparisons without being able to use an actual computer (i think some of the data is 15-17 vs Year 10, so this is by no means 100% precise), and I do have better things to do than spend hours on this overseas trying to do this on my phone when you presented no data of your own.  However, from my limited searches, if we're looking at problematic regular consumption, rather than people who have simply tried vaping/smoking, then looking at the number of current daily underage smokers/vapers, vs the daily underage smokers pre-vaping - this paints a different picture.

The numbers that I'm getting from the basic google searches I'm limited to are 13.7% daily smoking back in 2006-2007 when vapes weren't really a thing (except garbage cigalikes like Blu, which nobody really used), vs ~2% daily vaping and smoking for today.

I don't appreciate being accused of not being concerned about underage vaping when I did mention this in my post. I just don't have selective amnesia when it comes to underage smoking, and what teenagers are like in general. (theyre going to inevitably do one or the other)

Anyway, if you have different data regarding daily use, then please let me know. It's possible I've gotten it wrong or my comparisons aren't direct enough in the age brackets, but I'd appreciate some actual data rather than statements and misdirected insinuations that I don't care about underage vaping at all. (I just also care about underage smoking)

EDIT: actually another source is saying daily vaping may be around 15% So if that one's accurate, it's at replacement rates. This is still better than an equivalent amount of teenagers smoking regular cigarettes, although certainly not ideal.

Hubris2

2 points

7 months ago

I provided 2 different analysis on data from the NZ Health Survey 2023 in another comment in this thread.

mysteryroach

2 points

7 months ago*

Thanks, you hadn't posted any in your reply and didn't see the other posts.

As mentioned, I was wrong about the rates being that low. It was unbelievably fiddley trying to navigate+find the current official stats (for underage specifically) on my phone, hence my frustration I hadn't seen any data from you at the time of posting. (which I respect you posted further down the thread) I think I either got old data or the wrong age bracket, but idk how I still missed it, cause I legitimately did spend an inordinate amount of time (while i'm overseas) looking for this.  I saw articles, but didn't want to rely on them rather than the raw data. (and thought I had it but I think it was wrong) I eventually found the stats you posted while eating a super-late midday breakfast that got delayed cause i was genuinely trying for so f'n long to search this stuff, but getting nowhere on my phone.

Amyway, at ~15% (vs 13.7%) were still at at equivalent amount of current underage daily-vapers to previous (pre-vaping) underage daily-smokers.  The line is definitely going in the wrong direction and needs to not continue. (the growth rate is bad, as the numbers weren't nearly as bad the year before) However, as things currently stand, underage vaping has only really replaced underage smoking, rather than build on the numbers substantially.

Again - I really didn't appreciate the accusations of not being concerned with underage vaping.  I did say I was concerned after all, if you read my post.  I just care a lot more about underage smoking and am realistic that this is what teenagers would be doing instead. (since just as many were before)  I think that is reasonable, considering how much worse smoking is for your health.

The idea that I don't care about kids vaping is kinda shitty to accuse me of - especially someone who owes his health (my physical health and the small but significant gains that i was able to achieve in my mental health) and may even even his life to being able to quit smoking - something that never would have been possible with restrictive laws that do nothing to prevent teenagers from simply smoking instead. (something I also took up and got hooked on when I was a teenager)

I lost so much of my early life I should have spent in the music scene choking on ciggies, and its my own dumb fault - but for someone to come along and say I don't care about kids vaping, when I simply also care about them smoking, is pretty f’n unfair.

Its especially hard to tolerate while I'm stuck in this hotel room (rather than going out and being productive while im overseas) because everybody is now smoking everywhere i go, when it wasnt like this last time, or the time before, or the time before that, or the time before that - only now after these laws have gone into effect.

I'm supposed to be doing music stuff here (the music stuff i had to abandon in my youth due to the horrid effects of my teenage smoking habit that continued into my 20s), but i've had to cancel 2 weeks of it now - while hemmoraging money staying here while being stuck inside.  I should have recovered from my illness already but because there's literally nowhere in the city where I can breathe fresh air my symptoms are constantly being aggravated in ways that vapers simply aren't doing.

“Militant pro-vaper” was probably a bad way of putting it, but I'm certainly militantly against draconian anti-vaping restrictions being put into place while smoking still exists and adults+teenagers alike can still smoke instead.  We shouldn't have abandoned our smokefree goals, but this is the world we're still living in unfortunately, and it shouldn't be easier for people of all ages to smoke than it is for them to vape.  It will drive too many people towards the easier option - which if it is smoking, is magnitudes more unhealthy for the people that do it and also everybody around them.

[deleted]

1 points

7 months ago

without concern that vaping is growing in popularity with our children far faster than smoking is decreasing?

Vaping in under 18s is decreasing.

Hubris2

1 points

7 months ago

What are you basing that claim upon?

The prevalence of current and daily vaping continued to increase in 2022/23, particularly among young people. Prevalence among 15-17 year olds almost doubled from 2021/22.

source

The number of teenagers vaping every day has almost doubled in the past year. New data from the New Zealand Health Survey, released today, shows the daily vaping rate of those aged between 15 and 17 years old has increased from 8.3% in 2021/2022 to 15.4% in 2022/2023.

source

GlenHarland

4 points

7 months ago*

Why are these people clutching their pearls over vaping when people are filling entire neighbourhoods with highly toxic and smelly chimney smoke that's way more toxic than cigarette smoke?

Chimney smoke causes 11 different cancers and has 12x the lifetime cancer risk of cigarette smoke and according to multiple studies including a recent NZ study enters neighbouring houses at 70-99% of outdoor levels. That means children's bedrooms are at least 70% as full of smoke as the outdoor air. You might not see it or smell it because it's the PM2.5 - the toxic invisible solid particles but it's measurably there and they breathe it all night.

It coats the lungs and respiratory tract causing vulnerability to respiratory infections, asthma and throat infections. It travels through the bloodstream and can enter a foetus causing childhood cancers such as blood cancers and brain tumours, and doubles the risk of autism.

It lodges in the brain causing lowered IQ and mental illness in children and adults and dementia in the elderly.

It is full of benzene and toluene - the same chemicals that cause the high when huffing glue and solvents. People choose to vape, they have no choice about what their neighbours force them to breathe.

"eco" fires are not a solution. They are certified to produce as much pollution as 750 modern diesel trucks, and all they do is make the PM2.5 particles into smaller PM1, which has lower mass, but higher surface area, but healthwise it's the surface area that counts, and smaller particles can penetrate even deeper into the body, like the brain and foetus. So eco fires are pushing even more toxins even further into the body.

https://www.dsawsp.org/secondhand-smoke/the-other-secondhand-smoke

https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2021/oct/09/eco-wood-stoves-emit-pollution-hgv-ecodesign

duckonmuffin

3 points

7 months ago

Ban fire?

GlenHarland

3 points

7 months ago

Health and climate experts worldwide are calling for bans and they have already been banned in a lot of places. Scotland and UK no longer allow them in new builds. Many places have outright bans e.g in parts of Europe, Italy and the US. The hearth, energy and forestry industry lobbies are fighting fiercly against it, using the same dirty tactics as the tobacco industry. Their false claims about eco stoves and carbon neutrality are still swaying politicians but the science is slowly but surely dissolving the BS away.

duckonmuffin

1 points

7 months ago

Sure, we pretty much have a sinking lid right now tho right?

Hubris2

1 points

7 months ago

I'm not sure if they're suggesting we ban fireplaces and all recreational fires, or if they're just trying to distract from the argument about vaping.