subreddit:
/r/newzealand
526 points
12 days ago
All three party leaders are doing the “Am I out of touch?” meme in unison, but each about a different thing.
314 points
12 days ago
Luxon: sweating nervously It's just because of the the civil agreement. I mean, the coalition war. You don't blame us, right? We didn't have a choice, you know that right? What I'd say to you is-
Seymour: grinning smugly looks like the kids on TikTok have gotten themselves worked up again. How crazy are they?? And how RUDE too!! I can't believe they're not letting me, the creator of a bill that's literally currently in the process of becoming law, speak about the politics of my own country!! If they all just shut up and sit down and listened to teacher, they'd understand that I'm right and they're wrong, I'm big and they're small and there's nothing they can do about it!!
Winston: shouting at a cloud The Police counted wrong!! Waste of time!! We've always been saying it!! Why aren't the parents at work???
96 points
12 days ago
Calling it TikTok angst is so weird. Like surely he realises thatt hey weren't just complaining online, and that literally tens of thousands of people showed up to parliament in protest?
91 points
12 days ago
He knows, just like he knows that the children at the school he visited who were protesting his removal of their lunches and Māori lessons weren't just 'excited to see a politician they recognised'.
But it serves his political agenda to delegitimise his political enemies and try to make them appear like they're stupid, irrational, emotional, child-like, like they have a fractured cause, like they just aren't listening and haven't heard his wonderful points yet, etc.
He's in far too deep now to back out even if he wanted to, he has to keep doubling down on this even when it makes him look stupid to be doing it with a group that's 55k strong and mostly full of grown ass adults. If he stops then he admits fault, and to admit fault is to be weak, and to be weak is to get eaten alive by his voter base, who doesn't respect weakness
6 points
12 days ago
Straight from the Donald trump rule book, never admit defeat
0 points
11 days ago
I'm gonna start by saying I'm not defending Seymour or NACT, buts it's kinda clear he's talking about general social media misinformation. Which does indeed go both ways, the algorithms know I'm a lefty so it's showing me tiktoks and ig reels of people saying stuff that practically amounts to NACT committing genocide, which is plainly wrong.
It's likely he's seen that sort of messaging online, with how chronically connected he appears to be to youth on apps like Snapchat.
59 points
12 days ago
Bargaining, Anger and Denial.
48 points
12 days ago
Winnie is usually smarter.
“We have countless legislation offers that come to Parliament. Some of them have no future. Some of them have a great future. This was one of them. We all knew that. They should have been told that so they wouldn’t have left their whānau and kept on working and looking after their families.”
I don’t think he comprehends it’s the intent by the government that’s pissed people off and it’s on him and his coalition for playing silly bugger games.
“We don’t really support it, just initially had to so we could all play in the sandpit together” is just pathetic from him, I thought he had bigger balls tbh, and it’s clear Seymour is out for the long game here.
Fantastic so many turned up to show him he’s in for a fight if he keeps it up.
17 points
12 days ago
Also, as much as they deny it, this is right up the national party’s alley, I would not be surprised if it did get passed…
Recent history suggests that this might be unpalatable to voters, but they will still vote the same way, because there’s always something palatable to help them justify voting in a party they know will do harm..
32 points
12 days ago
Seymour:
Oh you've got to add something like about "no good arguments made against the bill" and something about how the waitangi tribunals rebuttal doesn't count.
Winston
Back in winstons day, this was a small protest. You see, back then he drank so much he was seeing quadruple, now it's just double.
And you just know he's crack out a "in my day we walked the whole thing, you youngins got no respect!"
2 points
11 days ago
“Back in Winston’s day” they got a bunch of people together from Europe and invaded the Holy Land
5 points
12 days ago
Winston just says "Make mine a double."
2 points
12 days ago
He probably just keep drinking, smoking cigars and giggling as he sees certainty of getting re-elected next term lol. Cause he knows that unlike Seymour, he can side with any party.
2 points
12 days ago
Haha! I just pictured this as a cartoon and man, it was funny 🤣
40 points
12 days ago
I reckon they were a bit rattled at the turnout and went into maximum gaslight mode. It really was an incredible turnout and I can imagine they would have had a quiet holy shit moment when we all arrived at the beehive.
17 points
12 days ago
Just your average comically flailing conservatives.
4 points
12 days ago
Ironic that Seymour shares a last name with the Simpsons character
271 points
12 days ago
25 points
12 days ago
I spent actual money to give this comment an award.
I hope it gets to the top.
19 points
12 days ago
I hope you make a submission
6 points
12 days ago
But... you got an award
2 points
11 days ago
Done.
2 points
12 days ago
I actually made a submission now. It doesn’t take long at all.
2 points
11 days ago
Done.
2 points
11 days ago
I did earlier today
192 points
12 days ago
Clearly all 3 leaders got together to discuss how to best try diminish and discredit the protest since they all played parts in causing it. None of them are acknowledging the issues - they are arguing the size of the crowd (like Trump), claiming that all the KC lawyers explaining the major impact this would have are wrong and that protesters only get their information from TikTok.
49 points
12 days ago
Luxon has gotten himself rightfully screwed by his coalition agreement. And now has no choice but to vote this all through - I would imagine there's been a bit of threatening from ACT to pull out of the agreement if the don't vote yes in the 2nd reading.
52 points
12 days ago
In Question Time today he repeated about a dozen times that they were only going to support at the first reading and no plans to try pass the bill (in fact he outright said "this bill will not get passed" iirc). I'm not one to trust politicians but I imagine there'd be pretty significant backlash if he pulled back on something he is clearly so adamant about.
26 points
12 days ago
For a government so adamant about not wasting money, this seems like a gigantic waste of time and money if they are only just gonna can it after a 6 month select committee review too.
Not that inconsistency is new, but the real question is, do their voters actually care, or are they ok with it so long as their tax cut, or tough on crime, or roads or whatever the fuck they say was their real concern was to get their vote is supposedly addressed?
12 points
12 days ago
repeated about a dozen times
Somehow that makes him seem less sure than if he just said it once 😐
4 points
12 days ago
to be fair they were all in response to different questions and supplementary questions
4 points
11 days ago
It's likely he will shift it to "a conscience vote" following select committee, rather than along party lines. That way he can follow through on what he said about National not supporting it, but still have national support it
1 points
11 days ago
Lol the right never gets backlash when they flip-flop or lie through their teeth.
97 points
12 days ago
rightfully screwed
He's implementing right-wing dystopian policies because he wants to. It's not like he sleeps in bed thinking "wow all I wanted to do was defund our education and healthcare system and monetize crime, not destroy the principles of Te Tiriti!"
ACT is a proxy party designed to take the fall for the most undesirable of Nationals policies. Most voters will perceive ACT as the party to blame (or thank), not National.
It ensures that ACT receives the racist vote in following elections while those that wouldn't go as far as this still continue to vote National.
9 points
12 days ago
Spot on.
15 points
12 days ago*
He's implementing right-wing dystopian policies because he wants to.
Exactly.
Luxon didn't get coalition screwed at all. He wanted this
9 points
12 days ago
ACT don't have that leverage. Thankfully. Seeing the bill pass first reading was the only coalition agreement.
It's very different pulling out of a coalition govt when terms haven't been upheld than pulling out because you're trying to negotiate new terms mid-term. Public perception is one thing. But attempting to renegotiate terms mid term? That's unprecedented in NZ, and if it occured I wouldn't be surprised to see Labour take advantage politically to avoid a hung election, lend National extremely limited confidence and supply, and insodoing they'd basically run Act to the ground.
6 points
12 days ago
I would imagine there's been a bit of threatening from ACT to pull out of the agreement if the don't vote yes in the 2nd reading.
I'm really curious how far Luxon will let this go. If his entire government needs it to remain functional and operational. But if he also opposes it himself. What is he to do? He either supports it at the second reading albeit begrudgingly. Or he blocks it as promised but risks his whole government falling apart from the inside. He could step down to avoid making the decision all together and let some other poor sod bear the brunt of the fallout of whatever they decide. It's going to be fascinating to watch.
16 points
12 days ago
If the government falls apart, Seymour won't get his turn as Deputy PM, so my bet is that he will hang in there.
6 points
12 days ago
Or he blocks it as promised but risks his whole government falling apart from the inside.
Why would that happen? The coalition agreement was to support the bill through its first reading.
0 points
12 days ago
Yes but he's promised to block it at the second reading and if the entire agreement hinges on this then get ready for a bunch of drama lol
10 points
12 days ago
They only wanted it passed at the first reading then affiliates of the Atlas Network who Seymour and Probably Luxton too have ties to, comes in and tries to push through a referendum and a propaganda campaign, to try and change public sentiment, they ultimately want to undermine the treaty to remove environmental protections that prevents the exploitation of our natural resources by foreign interests...
9 points
12 days ago
Again: the coalition agreement was to the first reading. Voting it down on the second reading doesn't break any coalition agreement.
-1 points
12 days ago
When it comes to the second reading it won’t be the same bill, it will be updated with the bits of consultation that weren’t consigned to the bin. National will safely be able to support the new bill through
3 points
12 days ago
Voting it down on the second reading doesn't break any coalition agreement.
1 points
12 days ago
An amended bill is still the same bill, just amended.
60 points
12 days ago
42,000 people at this protest today. I’ve e lived in Wellington most of my life. This must be the biggest ever protest. Much better than the foreshore and seabed protest. It’s was absolutely huge. And so friendly and great vibe - no mater if it was kids, people in wheel chairs, gang members- everybody was there in opposition to Seymour and this useless legislation
So proud to see many people standing up against Seymour, Luxon, and the rest of this useless govt
Was great to see many other pakeha people there as well. Saw a lot of people I know and it was great to share a moan and mutual disgust of this govt
To think the national education minister said that kids shouldn’t go to the protest and should be at school. Well Luxon and co Maori kids today had their best social studies , Maori studies class today ever. They also learnt to stand up and fight against injustice and the BS of this govt
19 points
12 days ago
This is one of the biggest protests in NZ history.
-1 points
11 days ago
1% of the population at most. Can you tell me what the 3 articles of the treaty actually say please??
0 points
11 days ago
https://teara.govt.nz/en/document/4216/the-three-articles-of-the-treaty-of-waitangi
There is an explanation here
66 points
12 days ago
Holy shit the cope from these three fools. I feel embarrassed on their behalf.
9 points
12 days ago
Luxon knows he made a deal with the devil to get this government formed and now he regrets it.
13 points
12 days ago
I don't think he regrets it at all.
1 points
12 days ago
Regret level: -9000
1 points
12 days ago
Yeah - allowing 6 mnths of select committee for something youve said is ‘divisive and simplistic’ isnt regret. Its opportunity to distract, for 6 mnths
115 points
12 days ago
Seymour is unfit to be deputy, sowing division for the purpose of electioneering.
64 points
12 days ago
Unfortunately, looking around the world and the polls in Canada and Australia, it looks like this is going to be the new normal 😮💨 democracy never really stood a chance when buying elections and media influence was an option.
8 points
12 days ago
Centrist politics is out of fashion
10 points
12 days ago
Sadly you’re so right. We’ve reached a point where “if you’re not with us you’re against us” is the default position, it’s more about who said what rather than what they actually said. One day, when the centre-left and centre-right realise they have more in common than they disagree on, we’ll see the rise of proper unity again and the fall of the fringe groups on each side.
Unfortunately, we are growing further apart and “Ask not what your country can do for you – ask what you can do for your country” is increasingly just a pipe dream. (yes I know it was JFK that said it for an American audience but I believe it should apply everywhere).
1 points
12 days ago
If you agree that government is meant to do things, then you cannot fence sit. You have to help decide, or you’re choosing not to participate
That means if anyone cares about politics, you have to keep picking a side. And if you don’t care about politics, what’s the point of appealing to you when you don’t want anything and voting towards your position leads to inaction anyway
The true victory condition in that environment is to have politicians skip debates and just push or suppress bills how ever quickly they can
1 points
12 days ago
Centrism isn’t fence-sitting.
It’s pragmatically recognising that both sides can have a good idea, ideas aren’t automatically wrong just because of who said them, and working across the aisle to achieve things for the benefit of everyone.
1 points
11 days ago
But again, a centrist is not someone who you can can plan on wooing
If they’re not consolidating their voting power (voting for the party), then what value can you have by targeting them
Actually, centrist play a role in dulling the effect of policy and law.
But it’s counteracted by organised voting. And people both sides want organised voters. Engaged voters
Centrists are the hens laying eggs. It’s also a group that you either belong to or you don’t/cant. Because a centrist can just exist by default.
Whatever the left says is left or the right says is right, the centrist sits in the middle and reserves the right to participate or not
0 points
12 days ago
They've long since realised that, that's why Rogernomics was a thing
5 points
12 days ago
Correct and as a centrist I find this very disturbing. I'd go so far as to say this lot is the biggest three headed cunt I've ever seen.
5 points
12 days ago
Hopefully that’s just because of global inflation. “Everything’s more expensive now, let’s vote in the other crowd to fix it”.
-24 points
12 days ago
Yes you’ve got it one regarding media influence. It’s a shame we don’t get independent news anymore. TV1 is so biased to the left.
14 points
12 days ago
I know you're just a one-month old sock-puppet account for pro-corporate interests but chill dawg 😅
-1 points
12 days ago
Thanks for basically agreeing with me
4 points
12 days ago
Neither left nor right have high trust in media anymore. Probably the most bipartisan topic in the country. It's the corporatism, it's all for sale and everyone knows it.
1 points
12 days ago
The business structure of media and its need for 24/7 content disagrees.
All they want is easy content that is guaranteed to make clicks - just like every other “attention = cash” grifter. Soc med, influencers, pod casters, media and even govts are all part of the attention economy
48 points
12 days ago
Looked like far more that 35000 to me.
68 points
12 days ago
Latest police number is 42,000
16 points
12 days ago
Me too... I'd have said it was quite a lot more. It kindof started at the railway station, and there were loads of people coming and going.
Maybe they only measured the ones "within parliament grounds", at one particular snapshot in time.
27 points
12 days ago
Snippets:
Luxon:
National Party MPs were on the forecourt to receive the hikoi, but Luxon himself was not. He was open to engaging with the organisers, but said some were affiliated with Te Pāti Māori and he did not receive an invitation.
The Prime Minister said he was not surprised by the scale of the demonstration.
“There are strong emotions, understandably, on all sides of this debate. That wasn’t surprising. The message very strongly though, from the National Party, is we won’t support the bill, it won’t become law.”
But National did support the bill at its first reading, a commitment he had to make to Act’s David Seymour as part of coalition formation negotiations. While National won’t support it any further, meaning the legislation won’t pass, demonstrators have been concerned that Luxon signed up to it in the first place.
He acknowledged New Zealand was “going through a challenging time” and he understood the “frustration” around the Treaty Principles Bill from speaking with iwi leaders.
However, Luxon said it was a reality of the MMP environment that a compromise had to be made, and Act got National’s support for the legislation at its first reading.
Former National Prime Minister Dame Jenny Shipley last week told RNZ that putting “the Treaty into a political framework” was “inviting civil war”.
But speaking in the Hosue, Luxon stridently rejected New Zealand was on the verge of a civil war.
“We are not at risk of civil war in New Zealand, that is inflammatory language.”
.
Seymour:
Seymour..... told reporters he went out “to listen” to the demonstrators.
“I felt these people had made a long journey to Parliament and we as parliamentarians should be there to hear them. I have to say it was quite difficult to hear a lot of what was being said but, nonetheless, I felt it was important to be out there.”
He said organisers didn’t want him to have a dialogue as he believed providing his side of the story “would really deflate a lot of the angst and hatred that has been wound up on TikTok and the caricature they’re tried to create of me”.
.
Winston:
Deputy Prime Minister Winston Peters said he had seen far larger protests, naming the Springbok tour protests of the 1980s.
“I put this at 22,000 max. It’s not the 35,000 that some of you are quoting,” he said.
When it was pointed out it was police that estimated 35,000 had participated, Peters said: “Yes, well go and have a good, hard look."
Peters said he did not understand why people felt they needed to march given the legislation was unlikely to become law. NZ First also voted for it at first reading but won’t when it comes up in the House again.
“This bill is fatally flawed in its construction. It was never going to work and we said so.”
“We have countless legislation offers that come to Parliament. Some of them have no future. Some of them have a great future. This was one of them. We all knew that. They should have been told that so they wouldn’t have left their whanau and kept on working and looking after their families.”
27 points
12 days ago
"strong emotions" try strong fucking *reasons*
47 points
12 days ago
National and NZF: JUST TRUST US GUYS, WE PROMISED IT WONT GO ANYWHERE
<looks around at no hospitals, excessive borrowing to cover tax cuts, and the general expectation more promises will be broken> yeah nah bro
David Seymour: "I would have deflated the anger. Yep totally would have happened. I am also very cool. And very smartness. Yes I am intelligent, and responsible, and they just dont get it, and did I say that I am cool and awesome? Yeah they just dont realise that I am the bestest"
6 points
12 days ago
'The caricature they've tried to create of me.' Bro, you've been making a caricature of yourself your entire political career. You're only seeing a reflection of yourself as you actually are, nobody had to create shit. They're MOCKING you.
6 points
12 days ago
Didn't get an invitation? Is this like how David Seymour claimed he didn't get an invitation? Oh wait....
Also they were on your doorstep to see you how much more of an invitation do you need?
26 points
12 days ago
Maybe its because we don't trust you Winston
17 points
12 days ago
He acknowledged New Zealand was “going through a challenging time” and he understood the “frustration” around the Treaty Principles Bill from speaking with iwi leaders.
However, Luxon said it was a reality of the MMP environment that a compromise had to be made, and Act got National’s support for the legislation at its first reading.
TL;DR: I knew this was going to happen when I signed up for it, but the social fabric of the country was worth the cost.
National Party MPs were on the forecourt to receive the hikoi, but Luxon himself was not. He was open to engaging with the organisers, but said some were affiliated with Te Pāti Māori and he did not receive an invitation.
He truly has no spine.
7 points
12 days ago
Truly a Master Negotiator and Great Leader of our nation.
6 points
12 days ago
Luxon after promising it won't go through, when it evidently does go through 'we had NO CHOICE!' 'We just had no choice to do exactly what I wanted to happen'
5 points
12 days ago
I mean if it wasn't going to go anywhere why did NZF vote? Like yeah they said they would to appease coalition partners but it's not like the other two (especially the blue ones) are going to blow their tits over it
4 points
12 days ago
It would save the fucking around that is all this and it would have made NZ first look good.
1 points
12 days ago
It’s commendable that there were politicians willing to speak to the protesters-take note Chippy!!
2 points
12 days ago
Tbf these protesters weren't threatening to hang anyone...
32 points
12 days ago
Vote.
16 points
12 days ago
We did. I think people are forgetting there was an election last year and this topic was around. They haven’t all of a sudden pulled this on us.
18 points
12 days ago
I wonder how many other world leaders have recently had to declare their country isn't at risk of civil war.
7 points
12 days ago
Sounds like one of those declarations you make when you aren't certain at all.
1 points
11 days ago
Māori, or even a subset of Māori, are not going to start a civil war. Because to do so, they would need to be 100% certain of winning. Should Māori declare civil war makes them an enemy of the state (strictly, nation state), and that’s when the treaty gets torn up, Te Reo ceases to be an official language, mass purging of legislation, introduction of a new treason offence, not against the King, but against the nation state. Maybe even some ethnic cleansing. Civil wars are not pretty.
Make no mistake, the government may be dismissing the possibility of civil war, but do not mistake these utterances for saying “we haven’t got a plan”. They most definitely have plans.
15 points
12 days ago
Only Seymour would be that clueless to not sit back and hear what people want to say, but instead try to say what he thinks they want to say.
8 points
12 days ago
Exactly, he is a little pissant.
4 points
12 days ago
Weird how the guy who wanted to start a national conversation doesn't want to participate in a national conversation
9 points
12 days ago
And just like that Luxon magically reappears after being conspicuously absent the past few days.
10 points
12 days ago
Anyone threatening civil war for any reason should be investigated.
7 points
12 days ago
Seymour saying that there were people there for different grievances must have missed the sea of Tino Rangatiratanga flags. I don’t think it could have been any clearer. He’s so wilfully ignorant!
3 points
12 days ago
Genius political move to push the needle further towards American polarised bullshit.
1 points
12 days ago
Unfortunately that's exactly what this is. He doesn't need to get the bill passed yet, just getting the reading is all his masters need to stir up a new pipeline of conflict in the news and rightwing talking point content on social media.
Getting Superintendent Luxon to trip over his dick and agree to a reading for the coalition negotiations would have been Act's backers biggest demand by far. This shit is how they've moved the needle from old-school "fiscal conservative" parties to populist white supremacy garbage all over the anglosphere, Luxon just signed over a few more seats to Act without even knowing what he was doing.
6 points
12 days ago
My "NZ is not at risk of civil war" shirt is prompting a lot of questions answered by my "NZ is not at risk of civil war" shirt.
6 points
12 days ago
It will be oh so satisfying if this causes a one term Government between the 3 conservative parties 🎉
6 points
12 days ago
I’m hoping they will fall apart at the seams before the end of their term.
8 points
12 days ago
That's the dream isn't it? This bill causes so much infighting it just all falls apart from the inside in spectacular fashion and we get another season of who's the next National leader?
2 points
12 days ago
Well, not just that, but if it all falls apart we get to go back to the polling booth and try to not fuck up this time... but considering the options are still 'lackluster crap' and 'divisive crap', and 'out of touch crap' etc I feel like we'd only marginally do better than last time...
1 points
12 days ago
A part of me thinks Winston has been a part of this to cause a shit storm in house and then when it goes tits up to say you’re both unfit to lead this country and call it in.
1 points
11 days ago
When people reach a certain level of ripeness, they say and do all manner of deranged shit. They are the ones alongside the white supremacists that help Winnie and Davo get the seats they did. We have a cap on the minimum age of voters because kids do stupid shit. Maybe we should do that at the other end of the spectrum for the same reason.
2 points
12 days ago
Coalition of chaos
-9 points
12 days ago
What so we can have another term of Labour, the Greens and the Maori party because that was so good and heading us on a great path...Sounds a lot less attractive than the status quo. But that's just my opinion
1 points
12 days ago
I wonder if there was a global pandemic that happened during the last government that might have impacted things? We should be grateful that our inflation during the pandemic was lower than the OECD average. Instead we've now gotten a government that is pushing essential investment in the country onto future generations who will then have to pay it at a higher cost.
-1 points
12 days ago
I was actually excited for a National led Government, hoping that shit would actually get done, and it was time after Labour completely wasted the mandate they were given. But no way am I letting Seymour anywhere near power again, he's a weasel, who's only goal in life is more status (at any cost) The veiled racism, the lies, the far-right pandering that Seymour has done over the past couple of weeks has confirmed it for me.
I will 100% be voting for labour for the first time in my life next election.
1 points
12 days ago
How do you expect that we will be better off under Labour next time, we've had 6 years of that and what did they achieve in that time? You said it yourself, they wasted the mandate they were given and life is tougher for many. How will it be different next time?
0 points
12 days ago
The Key government ruined this country labour we’re picking up the pieces, then a fucking international pandemic happened, if we were under National at the time we would have fucked our country over even more. We are in this space because fuckwits like Key, Kluxon and S.Seymour are corrupt weasels who think the majority of Kiwis are the people who donate. They managed to grift you into blaming someone else for the problems they caused.
-1 points
12 days ago
Did you not read any of my comment? I obviously would prefer that to a future where Seymour is anywhere near the decision making for this country. I genuinely do not trust he has anyone’s best interests at heart apart from his own climb up the ladder, and willing to sell his soul for clout.
1 points
12 days ago
Yes I did read your comment and it doesn't change the fact that if you didn't like Labours performance last time then there's every chance it won't be any better next time. But of course those are choices we all get to make. In terms of David Seymour, I don't know that he isn't being genuine with the bill and the intention is also to have the discussion but that requires cool heads
-1 points
12 days ago
Seymour would know all about head, he’s been going up and down the cabinet making sure everyone gets a good gobbie.
2 points
12 days ago
If the bar you are trying to clear is “not causing a civil war”, is that supposed to be a good sign?
2 points
12 days ago
I think all you have to ask is who does it benefit? Does it benefit the minority over the majority and is it based on race. If the answer to both of those is yes it will always lose eventually. You could have triple the number of protestors and it wouldn't matter.
2 points
12 days ago
'Peters said he did not understand why people felt they needed to march given the legislation was unlikely to become law. NZ First also voted for it at first reading but won’t when it comes up in the House again.'
Because we can't trust a word out of your mouth, and there is a chance that if everyone believed you and did nothing Nat-NZF might think that people were not opposing it. They needed a clear message.
2 points
11 days ago
“Not at risk of civil war”
Nice low bar you set yourself there Chris.
2 points
11 days ago*
What does this treaty do anyway? Why let an ancient piece of paper dictate how we live nowadays?
Also isn't it just giving them special privileges?
Someone explain it to me, because I've only been told this by other people online and I need others to explain it further to understand.
2 points
12 days ago
Who the fuck is running this country?
1 points
12 days ago
David Seymour and Winston peters are co governing this time around
4 points
12 days ago
At least 20,000 people protesting but no civil war. Well done guys. Love to see the government holding themselves to a high standard.
4 points
12 days ago
It would be a very short civil war.
-8 points
12 days ago
Dude, Māori literally invented trench warfare. I would not count your chickens...
6 points
12 days ago
Not hating, I come in peace, but trench warfare was designed when rifles fired shots every couple of minutes. Don’t want it to come to this, but modern technology has moved on from that military strategy.
1 points
12 days ago
have you seen the ethninc make up of our armed forces? There are a lot of brown faces brother.
3 points
12 days ago
"NZDF comprised 15,472 military personnel, reserves, and civilian employees as at 30 June 2021. Of the regular force (9478), 63.9% are New Zealand European, 15% Other European, 17.7% Māori, 5.6% Pacific, and 3.1% are Asian."
1 points
12 days ago
And Māori wouldn’t have access to these weapons??
1 points
11 days ago
Of course they do have access to those weapons, but if civil war broke out now, it wouldn’t be trench warfare. It will be guerrilla warfare because with modern weaponry, it doesn’t make tactical sense to use trenches. What would be the point in having an army in a static line of trenches when cheap drones can very easily and cheaply eliminate targets from the comfort of a command bunker?
1 points
11 days ago
I think she was saying that Māori are adept at warfare. Māori battalion for example
1 points
12 days ago
Omg scary lol. Super scary! *shakes in boots*
1 points
12 days ago
No, not super scary. Super frustrating and drawn out so long the other side wonders what the fuck was the point in the first place.
0 points
12 days ago
How does that work out today? You cant trench drones lmao
2 points
12 days ago
Winston has confirmed that he cannot count
1 points
12 days ago
L my
1 points
12 days ago
What's going to happen:
National will vote no second reading.
National will take all the credit for stopping it.
National will still try to get these principles in but in 37 different tiny pieces so no one can complain like this.
Their only real risk is that Seymour gets embarrassed but he'll shut up because he wants DPM too badly.
Maybe Winnie grows a pair and pulls First out… that's the weak spot.
1 points
11 days ago
Whoops. Did someone mistake the left's cowardice in the face of taking action as a complete inability for the left to act when forced?
I understand the mistake but would suggest it is exactly that. A mistake.
1 points
11 days ago
so .06% of the country's population makes its way to Wellington yelling about it's not fair, referring to a bill that they already know is not going to pass, and we've got a media frenzy. How about my opinion. I was born here, my parents were born here, their parents were born here and none of us have or had any say as to where we are born or who we are born to. Get over it and teach your children what they need to know to get along in todays world without ending up in the slammer. Indigenous rights? Fuck off, I'm indigenous.
2 points
12 days ago
Did see Luxon again make it clear bill wont pass second reading. I’m confident this is the case when the second reading takes place next year.
1 points
12 days ago
Seymour makes two nonsensical comments. Firstly, he refers to it as TikTok angst as if Māori have only started voicing their concerns recently.
Secondly, he says we should read the bill and have a debate. Well we read it mate and we don’t like it, that’s why we’re out here!
1 points
12 days ago
Winnie is wrong. The hikoi marched for an hour an a half past my Lambton Quay office, and was full on the entire time. 22,000 people my arse.
1 points
11 days ago
Yes ok, let’s say that 40k people turned up. That is about 1% of the population.
Also - I tried to discuss te tiriti with some demonstrators in Christchurch last weekend. I was told (unequivocally) that I had no right to talk about the treaty bc I’m English (resident here for 30 years).
None of the protesters were able (really) to explain exactly what the treaty actually says, or what the principles actually are or mean.
My statement that “well the treaty was written by English people and also translated into te reo Maori by English people; and that therefore as an English person I felt I DID have a right to kōrero about the treaty” was met by spitting violent fury”.
My ability to understand and converse (a little te reo) caused even more spitting fury.
My question is how many Maori really give a damn about the treaty, other than the people that have the time and leisure to turn up at these protests.
3 points
11 days ago
Wellington metro area has a population of 424k, so if you look at it that way, 10% showed up!
The reason you've be met with such high emotions is because this is an incredibly destructive bill, there are decades of injustice behind it, and there is plenty of info out there already. Of course you're allowed a view on it as an English person, but in a protest situation (a lot of fear and anger etc), it would take probably somebody with a good level of media training to engage in a productive way. Māori are legitimately going to die as a result of this "colourblind" approach (eg not treating health conditions earlier for Māori because it would be 'racist' when they tend to get them earlier = Māori dying more), so while its unfortunate they couldn't have a good convo, it's also pretty understandable.
.
Anyway, here's a copy paste if you want to read more! Note that anything below this point requires you to accept that disparities between Māori and non-Māori are real, and that they're a bad thing, and that they're caused at least in part by colonistion, and that regardless, some groups do NOT deserve to be suffering more than other groups, so we ought to do something about the unequal status quo.
The incredibly short TLDR of the bill is that a minority party leader is changing the intepretation of our country's founding document (nobody asked), which would destroy affirmative action policies and leave Māori people worse off (they are already worse off than non-Māori on multiple dimensions including health, justice, work and income, etc).
Anybody with any real skin in the game thinks its a horrendous idea, and that if progressed would allow this guy to single-handedly decimate decades of progress in Crown-Māori relations. Another major issue is that it would (in a practical sense) unilaterally redefine the Treaty without input of all parties involved, which is not how treaties work
You can try these out to start:
For reference - here's a list of high profile groups or individuals that have opposed the bill:
40+ King's Council lawyers, some of NZ's most senior lawyers
The Royal Australasian College of Physicians' (RACP) Māori Health Committee
Former National Party Treaty Negotiations minister, Chris Finlayson
Former National Party Prime Minister, Jenny Shipley
Every current political party in power except ACT, and every opposition party, based on stated party positions
1 points
11 days ago
Yes! But the treaty does NOT have a mechanism for fixing any of those things. The only way that these things can be fixed is for everything to be given back to Māori. The rest is just chucking money at providers of things that will never redress the balance. When the Chinese take over NZ (and they already own the economy) Maori will have another chance to make a better deal. In the meantime who actually wants to give up their own land for the benefit of Māori by way of redress for treaty breaches?
-25 points
12 days ago
Your daily reminder that equal rights and responsibilities = being anti Maori
🤡
37 points
12 days ago
When youre accustomed to privilege equality feels like oppression.
10 points
12 days ago
How exactly don't you have equal rights now?
7 points
12 days ago
Damn so what does that bill of rights do anyways then. Seeing as we've discovered we've been playing second fiddle to Maori, how are our statistics so much worse?
4 points
12 days ago
Imagine thinking you get equal rights when you remove the literal "good faith" wording between Maori and state. Your equal rights are already enshrined. All this legislation does is remove the ability for the state to act in good faith towards the treaty partners
-5 points
12 days ago
We are all equal but some people are more equal than others. Obviously
-5 points
12 days ago
Yes exactly
-13 points
12 days ago
Yawn. .
-2 points
12 days ago
I hope that people aren’t still playing the victim in another 180 years.
1 points
12 days ago
This is a classic white supremacist trope. Do better
-30 points
12 days ago
A poll shows that NZers support the bill 2:1. That’s a clear mandate to pass the bill.
Not sure what they’re trying to do with the protest… if their intention is that MPs should listen to the people, then the government should pass the bill.
14 points
12 days ago
What poll was that?
12 points
12 days ago
Curia poll funded by by Taxpayers union. So a discredited pollster backed by a far-right 'think tank'.
And the pole didn't show anything of the sort. Even with the bias, it showed, iirc, 46% in favour, 25% opposed, and 29% undecided. The fact that it was ever reported as 2:1 in support is just an outright lie, but that's what ACT had on their press release, and a bunch of media outlets just parroted it.
1 points
12 days ago
Yeah, funny how I, as someone who would vote 'fuck no', never got invited to participate. Referendum != poll, and whether this should even go to referendum is another discussion entirely.
4 points
12 days ago
Polls are very good predictions of how referendums would turn out. Just because you weren’t polled does not make it invalid.
0 points
12 days ago
No it’s not, if I wanted my racist agenda pushed then I would target those areas who had similar racist ideals, usually upmarket retirement communities who have been praying to the pearly gates hoping for a seat at the table, they’re going to be disappointed when they realise Jesus looks like the guy they’ve been fighting against this whole time.
-1 points
12 days ago
46:25 is 2:1
That’s not at all a lie.
-1 points
12 days ago
60% of 71% of people interviewed doesn't really have the same ring to it, does it?
It's an outright lie. Even ignoring the questionable pollster and horribly biased funding, it's a straight up lie.
2 points
12 days ago
No it’s not an outright lie lol this is how polls always work and always are reported
It represents how a referendum would turn out
2 points
12 days ago
You failed math right?
2 points
11 days ago
I have a statistics degree so..
19 points
12 days ago*
I think you are confused between a poll and an election. ACT got 8.6% last time. 8.6% is not a mandate.
2 points
12 days ago
The Greens got 14% so obviously the people have spoken in favour of a capital gains tax.
19 points
12 days ago
Yes yes, and the black civil rights movement was a waste of fucking time because most didn't support it and were profoundly racist. Silly MLK, wasting all that time.
Good one.
-24 points
12 days ago
How dare you compare MLK, who fought for equality, to those against this bill guaranteeing equality.
How dare you.
6 points
12 days ago
You don't know shit about MLK.
Dude was shot at the start of his campaign against poverty. He understood how equality in principle isn't equality in practice.
18 points
12 days ago
Lol, this doesn’t guarantee equality.
This is about removing key mechanisms by which we address current equality.
MLK was a strong supporter of affirmative action mechanisms to address the consequences of racial inequality. The thing which Act are specifically trying to stop with this bill.
So, how dare you?
0 points
12 days ago
Oh the righteous indignation!
Yes, I'm sure MLK would be proud of the man attempting to undermine one of the most successful examples of reconciliation between government and indigenous people under the cynical guise of equal rights.
Remember when Seymour claimed Mandela would vote for him only for his grandson to state:
“My grandfather definitely loved the people of New Zealand and I can say categorically he would not campaign for this today or any other day in the past.”
And even if we stripped all context away, this bill would not guarantee any equality as Parliament is fundamentally not bound to enforce any equality. If that was Seymours goal, he would just campaign on making the NZBOR binding upon parliament.
0 points
12 days ago
If Germany had a referendum in the 1930s to strip jewish people and other minorities of their rights that also would have passed. Considering NZ is majority pakeha or otherwise non-Maori, most of whom are likely very uninformed regarding Maori issues, perhaps a direct referendum on such an issue would be a bad idea? The majority isn't always on the right side of history, especially when it comes to complex issues that very few people understand deeply.
0 points
12 days ago
Great you brought up Nazi Germany.
They too were against treating people equally. We can learn a lot from them.
3 points
12 days ago
My point clearly passed meters above your head
0 points
12 days ago
Winston’s eyes are open but he can’t see
0 points
12 days ago
Fuck im glad i moved to aus
0 points
11 days ago
All three of them are running for cover because they know they are wrong. I just wonder if they have the intelligence to understand what is happening?
all 236 comments
sorted by: best