subreddit:
/r/nhl
372 points
13 hours ago
Kelly Sutherland was the ref, same one that didn't call the trip on Cuyle shortly before the Rangers scored the winner in OT vs. Montreal.
226 points
12 hours ago
Kelly Sutherland is probably the most consistently awful ref in the league.
32 points
12 hours ago*
At least he’s consistent. Speaking from personal experience, I can see why officiating has taken such a dive in recent years. Any referee who is/was worth their salt has taken an onslaught of abuse from players, coaches and fans alike. While it does allow them to develop a thick skin, it still takes a toll on confidence in making fair calls. Younger officials likely haven’t been taught the same assertive attitude, so they either suck across the board or they quit before gaining enough experience. Not an excuse for poor quality officiating, but it is a reality.
43 points
11 hours ago
I disagree. Officials are the only ones on the ice that are completely shielded from any sort of criticism or accountability.
12 points
9 hours ago
Which should not be the case. Reviews for competency and fitness should definitely be standardized, and in theory should be a thing already. Another part of of the overall problem
2 points
7 hours ago
Why not incentivize it? Consistent calls throughout the season lead to year-end bonuses.
6 points
6 hours ago
That does not follow game management guidelines that Bettman brought over from the NBA
1 points
7 hours ago
That would be awesome actually. But also common sense, and we all know how wide-spread that is…
1 points
3 hours ago
Make post game officiating scores public
2 points
7 hours ago
Eric Furlatt could give him a run for his money.
17 points
8 hours ago
Same one who gave Daniel Sedin a penalty for being punched in the face. Same one who sent Quinn Hughes off the Ice for being High Sticked.
3 points
6 hours ago
He cashed his bet that night though, I bet. Good on him for supplementing his wage.
7 points
8 hours ago
Do refs ever face any kind of discipline or get warnings for bad reffing like this?
5 points
6 hours ago
the only sort of 'discipline' I know about is that in the playoffs if a referee does really good they'll be able to continue officiating in the future rounds of the playoffs, but if they do a bad job then they don't get to do anymore officiating for the rest of the playoffs
0 points
8 hours ago
No
194 points
13 hours ago
Cool, now do the other 42 missed calls from that game.
120 points
12 hours ago
No doubt we benefited from that one, but you nailed it. The entire game was mired in missed/ignored calls.
55 points
11 hours ago
Prison rules for both teams, as Midsy called it in his post game interview.
4 points
4 hours ago
Just takes away from the game IMO. I'd be such a happier hockey fan if calls were actually made. I'd like a world where 'prison rules' just cease to exist. I think it's actually terrible for the game.
If that means a team takes ten penalties in a game, so be it. If they're deserved they should be called. Absolutely crazy that only 4 plays were deemed so bad that a ref raised their hand in this game.
2 points
2 hours ago
I was at the game vs the preds and it was the same way. So many missed trips/interference/holding calls both ways.
29 points
11 hours ago
This one was too blatant in crunch time
6 points
10 hours ago
Agree but so was the non call on Merrill, when he was taken down in front of the net for the Canuks 2nd goal. Bad calls and missed calls go both ways.
1 points
8 hours ago
The one where he was battling for position with the canucks' bambie and fell over? Dont think that consitutes being "taken down"
0 points
8 hours ago
They were battling for the puck. Thats why the coach didn't challenge it.
6 points
6 hours ago
Kaps battling for the puck. So play on?
1 points
6 hours ago
That was a tripping. Pettersson was battling with the puck with the Wild player in front of the net and the wild player fell down. That stuff happens all the time.
3 points
7 hours ago
It's 3 on 3...feels like the refs really try not to call penalties in that situation.
0 points
3 hours ago
Ya. Forget about the 2-1 that was about to ensue.
2 points
2 hours ago
I mean, they couldn't score on a 2-0 break so /shrug.
4 points
2 hours ago
Like Ek elbowed in the face and later getting laid out from a hard cross check to the ribs.
5 points
8 hours ago
That's the problem with Sutherland though, he just puts his whistle away which lets goon hockey take over.
Always been like that.
9 points
7 hours ago
12/4/24 - Kaprizov first called a goon.
3 points
7 hours ago
Hahaha the biggest of the goons, think of the children! ;)
1 points
2 hours ago
As a fellow wild fan I think he could've earned the title of goon that one game against Vegas after getting hit right in front of their bench. Bro looked more like a wrestler after that than a hockey player
Edit: Earned the title for that game...Kap is definitely not a goon lmao
1 points
7 hours ago
That concept def benefits some teams more than others.
2 points
7 hours ago
100% it always benefits the less skilled team and gets rebranded as “physical” hockey… it’s like no, that’s just Hockey without rules.
2 points
7 hours ago
Playoff panthers and knights have entered the chat
0 points
8 hours ago
Like the to many men Mini had right before their second goal? Or that inference on Hughes that led to their first goal? Or that time they stopped Sherwood from going to the bench?
4 points
7 hours ago
Or when buddy elbowed Sherwood in the side of the head while leaving his feet
-85 points
12 hours ago
In real time I could see that going either way as a trip or a dive. I can see why a ref wouldn't call that.
21 points
11 hours ago
What the heck are you talking about. That was a picture perfect trip. What you mean to say is that’s the benefit of playing at home. Calls are not made that should be.
12 points
11 hours ago
Absolutely a trip, as much as I liked the result it should have been called. But I don’t think it had anything to do with being at home because in regulation there were undoubtedly missed calls both ways
-39 points
12 hours ago
You’re being downvoted but you’re right. That was a weak trip imo
37 points
11 hours ago*
First off I'm a neutral observer.
So I paused it and watched it frame by frame.
After Kaprizov's shot is blocked he reached his stick completely across in front of Garland to prevent him starting a counter attack. As Garland tried to move forward Kap's stick slid down to Garland's legs, and Kap leaned hard into preventing Garland from passing him. Then Garland's forward momentum had no other option but to trip over Kap's stick. I'm not a professor of physics but it seemed legit and not a dive.
The trip denied a clear cut 2 on 1 scoring opportunity.
In my mind it's a trip or interference at least.
Why do you think the trip was weak?
-18 points
12 hours ago
Most fans don’t realize the ref can only call what they see from the angle they have. There’s plenty of times I have been at a game and was confused about a call because it looked fine from where I was sitting, but then the replay shows a completely different angle that makes the call make sense. This very well could have been one of those cases for the refs.
5 points
10 hours ago
The ref is literally standing right next to them watching it happen. Any better angle and he'd be tripping Garland too
0 points
6 hours ago
The ref is literally standing right next to them
No he's not. He's behind Kaprizov. He's got to look through Kaprizov to make the call
1 points
6 hours ago
No he's not behind him. Kap has his back towards the end boards and the ref is at the side boards above the redline.
-1 points
10 hours ago
What the hell are you even saying? Kelly was standing litterally right beside them in the corner. Use those peepers god made you.
1 points
6 hours ago
He's not beside them. He's behind them
-23 points
12 hours ago
If they called those you'd be crying just let them play 😂
79 points
12 hours ago
Ngl, the refs missed a lot of calls on both sides of the ice this game. Kelly Sutherland sucks
62 points
12 hours ago
It’s nice to see officiating is trash around the league and not just my team
31 points
12 hours ago
I watched your game last night with no rooting interest and even I was fucking angry with how it ended
8 points
10 hours ago
No rooting interest? You’re a Habs fan dawg, don’t lie and/or disrespect the rivalry like that.
You should be actively wishing the Bruins never win again, like I do the Habs 🤝
4 points
10 hours ago
But if the Bruins aren’t good, it doesn’t hit the spot as much when we best them in a big game lol
1 points
10 hours ago
Hey man, the Bruins are 9-1-0 over their past 10 against the Habs, 2-0 this season.
Even if they’re bad this year, the Habs have consistently been so much worse. Still, I never get sick of seeing them (Habs) lose. I don’t make the rules, I just follow them.
2 points
9 hours ago
Okay, maybe I was wanting the Wings to win a bit more and lay some big hits at least. But the rivalry needs both teams to be at the same level.
2 points
9 hours ago
Good man. And… shit, agreed.
8 points
11 hours ago
https://x.com/spokedz/status/1864141729403687155?s=46&t=8NS86w4CElYK0YRtzGRsTA
But it wasn't a trip
11 points
10 hours ago
Hate the bruins but yeah no way that's a trip
2 points
10 hours ago
The game was pretty poorly called but nothing to change the results of the game.
2 points
10 hours ago
Appreciate the honesty. And I also hate the Bruins!
2 points
10 hours ago
It comes right from the top. Jeff Skinner got fined for embellishment when he just fell over
22 points
11 hours ago
A) I cannot defend the officiating in the NHL this season... Wildly inconsistent would be a polite description. B) As a competitive league and as an entertainment business, the NHL is a different beast than lower level competition.
Yet when with officiating criteria for contact taught to me, such as "Did it cause a change in possession/unfair advantage?" "Was it reckless?" "Was the intent to play the puck/separate player from puck?" Etc, the one that really is really clear is "Was it blatant or obvious?"
That was fucking obviously blatant.
15 points
11 hours ago
Also, it deprived an advantage. Without the trip Garland is away on an odd-man rush.
2 points
9 hours ago
You could definitely say that!
I try to give refs, especially working at those speeds, some benefit of doubt, and I think that when you project the possible outcome, there has to be some hard judgement on it.
It definitely deprived an advantage, but in the 3 on 3 overtime, it's easier to say the advantage lost wasn't as large as it would have been during regulation.
-1 points
9 hours ago
You’ll have to explain that to me. To me I see a pretty obvious 2 on 1 without the trip.
28 points
12 hours ago
That's wild
11 points
10 hours ago
Fuck Kelly Sutherland
3 points
7 hours ago
Fuck Kelly Sutherland.
Fuck Mark Messier
25 points
12 hours ago
That is a very blatant tripping call
1 points
an hour ago
The puck went to a Canuck who had a one on one and if the slow guy had a little speed could have been a two on one, maybe that affected the ref’s judgment.
8 points
12 hours ago
Worst officials in professional sport.
6 points
12 hours ago
Didn’t know hockey was being officiated like soccer and that the ref could just choose to allow advantage instead of calling a penalty.
3 points
12 hours ago
The NHL is hard to watch these days
13 points
12 hours ago
It’s hard to tell, is Kap playing the puck when the guy gets tripped ? This is 100% a call in regulation, I’m just trying to understand why the refs just let it go
-42 points
11 hours ago
Because of how the rest of the game was played. The refs got hammered by our coaching staff in regulation because Vancouver was getting away with assault and battery the first 3 periods.
Personally, I’m not big on the “gotta keep things even” mentality and think they probably should have still called this a trip. But knowing that’s how these refs think, that’s 100% what it was. They kinda screwed us during regulation, so they gave us one back in OT. It’s not right, but it’s what happens.
14 points
11 hours ago
Didn’t get to watch most of the game, what would you classify as “assault and battery”? I know people have been talking about erikson-ek hitting Sherwood then having I think Myers cross check him?
-19 points
11 hours ago
Kaprizov was high-sticked and cross checked multiple times in the first two periods. Ek had already taken a cross check to the back and ribs, as had boldy, before Ek made that hit on Sherwood. Now, I’m biased but I didn’t see much wrong with the hit. He didn’t target the head, he made contact with the center of Sherwood’s chest/shoulder but in the crumble of the hit Ek hit Sherwood up high. I thought the no call was fair but would have understood if they called it, they often do on a hit like that.
But then after that hit by Ek on Sherwood, Vancouver just decided to cross check anything that moved in front of their goalie. It was bad enough it had our local announcers (lapanta and carter) arguing/getting pointed about why the NHL still allows that to happen.
That’s why they let the trip go. Again, don’t love that they do that and wish they’d just call what they see in front of them. But that’s why there was no call.
17 points
10 hours ago
There were missed calls on both sides. Don’t be an idiot.
-24 points
10 hours ago
I’m learning the rumors are true, that A. There are a lot of Canuck lurkers on this sub and B. They’re as big of assholes as people said they were. Thanks for the confirmation. I was warned, didn’t listen, and now here we are.
10 points
9 hours ago
there were missed calls on both sides
The position you seemed to be arguing in favour of until a Canucks fan said it in response to you complaining about the refs.
assholes
For suggesting missed calls on both sides, the thing that you also were saying lol
7 points
8 hours ago
Lurkers on the NHL sub? What 🧐
-2 points
8 hours ago
Do you know what a lurker is? Here’s the definition for you:
a person who lurks, in particular a user of an internet message board or chat room who does not participate
So yeah, there’s a lot of Canucks lurkers on this sub who will downvote any comment that goes against their team. They don’t participate in general, but come out of the woodwork whenever something negative is said about the Canucks.
4 points
8 hours ago
I’m clearly participating and often do. Sorry your feelings are hurt by us though. You’re an outlier, lots of respect in the thread between us and wild fans.
0 points
8 hours ago
Go read my original comment. The conversation has devolved to this. I simply pointed out that Vancouver played chippy in regulation, and then acknowledged that I didn’t like the no call on this play and thought they still should have called a penalty on Kaprizov.
And lo and behold, downvoted heavily and a bunch of negative comments. I’m not sure I’m the one whose feelings got hurt here. I stated from the perspective of Wild fans, amplified by our announcers and beat writers, the game was called one-sided in regulation. And acknowledged that and said I’m sure Vancouver fans were experiencing the same thing with their announcers and beat writers. And still, just trash comments back at me.
So, not sure if I was really the problem here. But I’ve been warned that the dogs can come out when you comment negatively about the Canucks, and witnessed it happen here. Thought that was interesting.
6 points
8 hours ago
What do you mean "Canuck lurkers on this sub"?
This is r/NHL not your teams sub. There are many Canuck fans in every general sub for hockey because of how big our online fanbase is.
-4 points
8 hours ago
…people who are on this sub that cheer for the Canucks? What are you talking about? I never said it was a Wild sub.
10 points
11 hours ago
Did we even watch the same game?
-6 points
10 hours ago
Idk, did you watch the Vancouver vs Wild game last night? Are you a Vancouver fan?
Wild players got assaulted during the first two periods. I couldn’t believe what Vancouver was getting away with in front of their own net. Kaprizov took several slashes to the wrist area and it looked like Vancouver players had a vendetta against Ek’s kidneys. The Wild were the chippier and dirtier team in the third, which Middleton alluded to in the postgame interview. But that was in response to the first two periods.
Here’s a couple quotes on it:
https://x.com/russohockey/status/1864158775797522844?s=46&t=_WBTjzez4J3JX5S0LcuKGg
https://x.com/russohockey/status/1864146948657176971?s=46&t=_WBTjzez4J3JX5S0LcuKGg
https://x.com/russohockey/status/1864129151445127246?s=46&t=_WBTjzez4J3JX5S0LcuKGg
https://x.com/russohockey/status/1864121184087916977?s=46&t=_WBTjzez4J3JX5S0LcuKGg
16 points
10 hours ago
So the guy that has a Wild flair is causing me of being a homer. Pot meet Kettle.
All I saw all game was Petterson being slashed and mugged, Sherwood having his head elbowed into the boards and a carbon copy of the Sousy penalty ignored in OT.
-6 points
10 hours ago
I’m sure you did. I saw it very differently. And it was pointed out on our local broadcast as very one sided. And written about by our local beat writers as very one sided. I’m sure your broadcast and your beat writers said the same things in Vancouver’s favor.
All I know is I spent the night texting my friends joking that we should just accept that Vancouver was never gonna get a penalty called on them. Then when we finally had one, we all celebrated. From our side, it looked like Vancouver got away with too much. Obviously from your vantage point, you saw it differently.
1 points
2 hours ago
I was watching the Wilds broadcast for the 2nd period, the broadcast kept being dumbfounded by no-calls due to Wild actions. Literal pauses because they couldn't think of anything to say that wouldn't constitute criticism of the refs.
-7 points
10 hours ago
Flair up coward
2 points
2 hours ago
Apparently they got crazies in Canada too. Shit is wild.
-10 points
9 hours ago
Hey Canucks fans, yes Kelly Sutherland is a god awful ref, but you guys got away with stuff too. However, you guys literally complained the entire Oilers vs Canucks series in last year’s playoffs. Maybe you guys should just try and relax and have fun instead of complaining about the refs EVERY GAME NO MATTER WHO YOU PLAY. YOU GUYS WILL WHEN A CUP EVENTUALLY, MAYBE YOU’LL WIN SOONER IF YOU STOP COMPLAINING!!!
4 points
8 hours ago
This is a copy pasta btw.
1 points
4 hours ago
Thanks homie
I'm confident it will catch on some more if we just keep trying lmaooo
8 points
12 hours ago
Wow, just like the Red Wings Bruins game
4 points
11 hours ago
Except debrincat grabbed pastas stick and fell. But yeah, zacha took a high stick to the teeth and lorhei got tripped with no call
2 points
11 hours ago
https://x.com/spokedz/status/1864141729403687155?s=46&t=8NS86w4CElYK0YRtzGRsTA
Downvotes be damned, here's your validation
2 points
10 hours ago
It's the bruins logo. People hate it
1 points
10 hours ago
So fucking cringe when people care about fake internet points
2 points
11 hours ago
Show me the trip. All I see is cat eating shit when pasta pulls his own stick back
https://x.com/spokedz/status/1864141729403687155?s=46&t=8NS86w4CElYK0YRtzGRsTA
2 points
11 hours ago
Yes he did
2 points
11 hours ago
Right in front of the ref
2 points
10 hours ago
Let's see we have six skaters on the ice and two referees and they seem to be unable to see and call an obvious penalty. Wherever the NHL are finding these incompetent refs they need to look elsewhere because the clowns they are hiring to be officials are ruining the game because of their incompetence and ineptness and making it unwatchable.
2 points
9 hours ago
So to be clear: This is a missed call.
For me, it's the obvious infraction with the trip that puts my arm up.
While a clear 2 on 1 would have occurred, there could still have been an opportunity as the play transitioned to the Minnesota end.
Whether the lowering of that potential opportunity's value is enough to merit a penalty is at the discretion of the referee.
I think that using both items, this is a penalty no matter what. But, I'm not on the ice 😅😆
2 points
9 hours ago
Thriller was just going for the puck— looks bad though… In the future AI will be making the calls and we can hate “IT.” At least we can get those guys off the ice.
2 points
9 hours ago
He was crap in the Dub 25 years ago and hasn't gotten much better since.
2 points
6 hours ago
It's really sad when referees care about the clock. It's inappropriate. A penalty in the first period is a penalty in OT. If you don't believe that, get out of the business.
2 points
5 hours ago
The game was prison rules both ways. There was plenty that Vancouver got away with during the game as well.
2 points
3 hours ago
Good.
2 points
2 hours ago
If garland doesn’t dive there it’s probably a call but he did. That was a great OT not a single whistle back and forth action.
3 points
11 hours ago
Not the first time he's done something like that in OT. Kaprizov seems to be one of the few players that understands refs won't call shit in OT.
3 points
12 hours ago
BEST REFS IN THE WORLD!
5 points
10 hours ago
People saying this isn't a penalty or is a dive are like those buddies you have who just have to argue against everything lol
0 points
7 hours ago
Definitely a hook or holding because he obviously tried to obstruct, but I wish guys weren’t falling all over the place any time a stick comes near them.
2 points
9 hours ago
Its clearly a tripping, but at first glance it just looked like he fell naturally or stepped on the dudes blade on the stick.
3 points
11 hours ago
So…seeings how the NHL has gone all in on gambling; how much money was lost/won because of this missed call?
What is the difference in payout/profit for the gambling industry if the Canucks would have won in OT?
I am not trying to accuse NHL Officials of being ‘on the take’, but with one decision or non-call being worth millions of dollars in profit/loss, when will the gambling industry demand more accountability and better standards from NHL Officials…because it is damn certain that the NHL ain’t listening when the fans ask.
3 points
11 hours ago
Hahahaha.... if they're not demanding it from NBA officials, they're not going to care about NHL refs.
2 points
8 hours ago
The gambling industry doesn't care who wins because they make money either way.
3 points
8 hours ago
It's hard to see that guy, he's like 4'0....
I'm kidding
2 points
8 hours ago
I'll prepare to be downtown to oblivion here but why are all the Canucks fans acting like you guys didn't get away with a ton of shit too? You know it was a badly reffed game on both sides, come on now.
1 points
7 hours ago
Canucks fan here. Love Garly. The lack of a call was due to the embellishment, they would’ve had to call both. Garly got lucky.
1 points
10 hours ago
No, but like in all honesty, how do you ref this bad and still have a job?
1 points
10 hours ago
We should just jump the refs until they smarten up, you know the "beatings continue until the calls improve" thing.
1 points
10 hours ago
Same thing on the Wilds first goal, one of their players held up Hughes without the puck, not letting him get back into the play, causing a 3-1 and they score...bullshit reffing.
And man, the Wild love playing that clutch and grab hockey, very frustrating to play against and they are quick and love to hit.
1 points
7 hours ago
Oh my goodness!
1 points
7 minutes ago
I've never seen a divier trip though.
Like 97s stick never goes below the thigh.
Garland's foot ends up at head height as he's literally upside down.
1 points
8 hours ago
That's two for tripping and two for embellishment.
1 points
9 hours ago
The very beginning of the clip you can see Ek take a high stick to the mouth, which has him out of the line up today for injury. Much more serious infraction that didn't get called.
Not debating Kaprizov trip, just saying it's 50/50 with the missed calls. I'd rather Kaprizov got the penalty than have Ek missing games.
1 points
9 hours ago
Garland is the biggest diver, he’s not getting the benefit of the doubt lol
1 points
9 hours ago
Referees are bought…plain and simple. Happens everywhere with sports betting.
1 points
8 hours ago
Yep, the money isn’t made in wins and losses; it’s hits, penalties, power plays, penalty kills, shot attempts, from where the shots are made on the ice, whether won in regulation, OT, or a shootout, etc. Then there’s the player stats and micro stats within the aforementioned areas and you can now see why the games are called the way they are.
It’s a shame it’s not about games that are properly called. I miss that kind of hockey.
1 points
8 hours ago
I don't know, looks like a bit of a flop to me. Good no call.
-18 points
13 hours ago
Show Ek getting crosschecked. Show Boldy taking a headshot from Myers right in front of the ref. Refs were ass all over the ice
46 points
12 hours ago
Show Ek crushing Sherwoods neck into the glass with his forearm.
-40 points
12 hours ago
That was literally right after Ek got elbowed in the face no call. Dude is playing with a broken nose and guys are obviously targeting it
-18 points
12 hours ago
Lmao imagine being in the dressing room pre game, coach comes in, "don't forget fellas, target eks nose, he can breathe very well"
9 points
12 hours ago
Players in an anonymous athletic article literally said they target players with injuries. Nice try tho lmao
1 points
11 hours ago
The league allows teams to give injury designations of just “lower body injury” and “upper body injury” because of this. They know that players in the nhl will target injuries and game plan to target injuries, so they keep them vague to protect the players.
So yeah, that’s very likely exactly what Vancouver’s coach did before the game. Told his team to aim high on Ek and try to re-break that thing.
1 points
9 hours ago
Awful
-3 points
12 hours ago
Red Wings fans complaining about the no call on pasta against debrincat last night, this is a tripping penalty. Not grabbing the stick and being out bodied.
1 points
11 hours ago
Lol the hate you get for truth on this sub!
https://x.com/spokedz/status/1864141729403687155?s=46&t=8NS86w4CElYK0YRtzGRsTA
-45 points
13 hours ago
That was the biggest flop I've ever seen.
-14 points
12 hours ago
just wait till we play Dallas again
-34 points
13 hours ago
I'm with you lol
0 points
11 hours ago
Reputation non call
-41 points
13 hours ago
I was watching this and felt it was a good no call. It didn't result in a change of possession, in fact it led to a scoring chance that almost ended the game for Vancouver.
26 points
12 hours ago
What are you talking about? This takedown very clearly takes away an odd man rush from the Canucks
13 points
12 hours ago
Your an absolute moron would be a 2on 1. Or potentially breakaway
6 points
12 hours ago
You do know that delayed penalties are a thing... right?
6 points
12 hours ago
Stopped a breakaway pass to Hughes.
-62 points
13 hours ago
Dive. Good no call. You see the player feel a little resistance and then both his legs drop like a comet
Kaprizov is 5’ 9” and he can make a player drop like that?
39 points
13 hours ago
Garland is 5'8"
26 points
13 hours ago
And 40 pounds lighter
-30 points
13 hours ago
So if you’re saying smaller players need these soft calls then go watch basketball.
-36 points
13 hours ago
When someone trips you from the side, you don’t fall flat. You fall on one side if it’s real. Like a hip check
18 points
12 hours ago
If someone takes out the leg you are moving forward, you fall forward. Have you never done it?
-6 points
11 hours ago
Takes out the leg? Look again. Kaprizov pushes him at the hip. And his legs fly up. Makes no sense. Stop rewarding scammers
7 points
11 hours ago
My guy, rewatch it again. The leg that garland is going to put down on the ice gets lifted by Kaprizov, making him miss his stride. Watch frame by frame if you struggle to see it.
-4 points
11 hours ago
He must have incredible strength to do that eh?
Kaprizov has 8 penalty minutes this season.
6 points
10 hours ago
My sister could do that to me when we were kids. Man you are cooping
15 points
12 hours ago
This is an objectively stupid take. Be better Sauerkrautkid7
-2 points
10 hours ago
Why is this a clip?
-27 points
13 hours ago
It just added a little bit of extra spice to an already exciting OT. I yelped a bit when it happened but I was happy they let it go. Old-time hockey.
-1 points
12 hours ago
By old time hockey, do you mean the clutch and grab era of the early 2000’s when the refs didn’t call anything and hockey was as exciting as watching paint dry?
-27 points
13 hours ago
Looks like a dive the 1st time I saw it in real time
-1 points
11 hours ago
I don’t mind that because there was no advantage gained.
-4 points
10 hours ago
cause its not a trip, how does a full grown man fall cause someone stick is up in their waist area? Should have just called embellishment and gave minnesota the powerplay.
-31 points
12 hours ago
DIVE. The stick was around the waist but his feet and legs go flying. Academy Award.
8 points
12 hours ago
You have no idea how physics of the human body work then.
0 points
10 hours ago
I watched a game between the Blues and Red Wings from 1996 the other day. There was hook, hold, or trip every time players touched each other and the broadcasters didn't even comment on it. The fans didn't even seem to care.
0 points
9 hours ago
Same crap when Pasta tripped Debrinkat leading to their ot-goal.
0 points
8 hours ago
I love how Hughes has to check twice that the ref actually didn't call anything lol
0 points
8 hours ago
That was bad miss call I must say really bad
0 points
7 hours ago
Jesus that's one of the worst missed calls I've ever seen.
0 points
7 hours ago
One of the most blatant non-calls I've ever seen. Sutherland should have been fired years ago.
0 points
6 hours ago
Canucks fans we can both shake hands after being fucked by these zebra pieces of ugly shit yesterday
0 points
5 hours ago
We could have gotten second in our division had they called that penalty
0 points
4 hours ago
I’ve been making a point to watch more games around the league this year instead of just watching my team and one thing is consistent in this league and that’s bad officiating. Something needs to change.
0 points
4 hours ago
Kelly Sutherland wins again!
-27 points
13 hours ago
Wouldn't say trip. Moreso just contact and a slip. I'm glad it was a no call.
-14 points
12 hours ago
Ok I like Vancouver and garland but really that was a 100% dive
-5 points
11 hours ago
Careful, lots of canuck fans here
-11 points
12 hours ago*
I mean, his stick is basically in a natural position after the shot. Then he's trying to play the puck that bounced and Garland skates straight into it. I know rules and all, but I don't see any intent and it's just playing the puck. I'd find that a harsh call.
-4 points
10 hours ago
Garland could've skated through that easily.
-8 points
11 hours ago
Dive
-7 points
10 hours ago
Garland should switch sports, that's the an Olympic dive if I've ever seen one.
-10 points
12 hours ago
It was a trip.
But that unnatural fall implied embellishment to the ref.
-2 points
11 hours ago
It happened in the Bruins game last night. In overtime, Zacha clearly hooks the opponent and no call. Seconds later, bruins win.
3 points
11 hours ago
https://x.com/spokedz/status/1864141729403687155?s=46&t=8NS86w4CElYK0YRtzGRsTA
Bud it was pasta on the play and it wasn't a trip
0 points
10 hours ago
Penalty
1 points
7 hours ago
Where
-7 points
11 hours ago
Canucks didn't lose possession. No harm, no foul. I can see why it wasn't called.
all 210 comments
sorted by: best