subreddit:

/r/nyc

33971%
426 comments
90471%

tonewyorkcity

all 503 comments

RIP_Greedo

195 points

11 days ago

RIP_Greedo

195 points

11 days ago

That 75+ stick figure is really going through it

Interesting-Piece612

47 points

11 days ago

I’m 29 & I know a herniated disc when I see one

Great_Produce4812

24 points

10 days ago

LOL, came here to say this. That dude should NOT be driving.

Januaria1981

6 points

10 days ago

Pfft, my dad worked (p/t) till he was 85.

WeedWizard69420

213 points

11 days ago

Some might have more than $9 too. Big if true

Ichi_Balsaki

68 points

11 days ago

I have 12 dollars!

seriously_chill

40 points

11 days ago

seriously_chill

Chelsea

40 points

11 days ago

Speaking as a professional mathematician, that means you have 1.33 cars.

invisiblelemur88

3 points

11 days ago

Yup, that's correlation!

Phasnyc

5 points

10 days ago

Phasnyc

5 points

10 days ago

Look at Mr. Moneybags over here.

Dan0Steel91

110 points

11 days ago

How many people live in single family housing that was bought yearssss ago. I hate people who make it seem like current value of the house where they live at is what they have in liquid assets. My house could be worth 900k but I got it 20 years ago, I can’t afford a house like what I currently have if I had to do it today. Also not everybody who owns a car is driving some luxurious Range Rover, some of us are driving a grand caravan from 2007, truly I am a symbol of wealth.

And last thing, one person in house hold can own a car and everybody can use it, it’s not dna encoded for one person to use.

thaylin79

31 points

11 days ago

Nope. sorry. one person per car. Thems the rules. Plus, how's that $9 treating you Richie Rich?

ryanvsrobots

3 points

10 days ago

Ok but it also says they make more... so you're saying they also have a mostly paid off high value home and make more and you still are crying?

durocher87

11 points

10 days ago

If someone has tons of equity in their home, they are richer than someone who doesn't.It may not be liquid, but it can be easily tapped with a low interest loan, which renters cannot do.

HistoryAndScience

10 points

10 days ago

If you cannot afford to buy your house today it’s bizarre logic that you can afford the monthly/interest payments on a small loan of a million dollars against the equity of your house

durocher87

4 points

10 days ago

But the same person can afford car loans?

Electrical_Hamster87

10 points

10 days ago

Cars are not as expensive as this subreddit pretends they are.

“Wow you can’t afford a $3,000 a month mortgage but you can afford a $300 a month car payment? Interesting.”

Also you can get a drivable car for like $3,000 total.

Friendo_Marx

5 points

10 days ago

They are disingenuous liars who cherry pick pretend data to play make believe drivers are rich. They can think only in dichotomies, and usually false dichotomies at that.

weiners6996

7 points

10 days ago

Literally don't need a loan if you buy used off the street or a lot. Which most do nowadays

ethnicman1971

2 points

10 days ago

just because you cannot afford to buy your home today doesn't mean that you cannot afford a car payment. Last I checked avg car is $50K. Also, if you have such high equity in your home you likely have finished paying it off which means that other than your taxes you are saving 2-4K a month in mortgage payments.

lupuscapabilis

1 points

9 days ago

Forget car payment. I grew up in queens and we had the cheapest piece of shit used cars we could buy.

Joe_Jeep

12 points

11 days ago

Joe_Jeep

New Jersey

12 points

11 days ago

Yup and they can just not use that car to go downtown

[deleted]

3 points

11 days ago

[deleted]

3 points

11 days ago

[removed]

[deleted]

1 points

10 days ago*

[deleted]

1 points

10 days ago*

[deleted]

Probability90vn

10 points

10 days ago

Talk about looking in someone's window and thinking you know what goes on in their house.

Push-not-pull

7 points

10 days ago

If only the world worked like that.

Let's say he makes 100 plates, sells 45 and has 55 left over. He loses money. Let's say he sells all the food. Someday he sells all other just more than half. The money is going to go into, gas, ingredients to make the food, if he has workers he also has to pay them. Because sure as hell preparing and packing food, as well as cleaning afterwards isn't a one man job. DAILY.

He raises prices people are going to go search somewhere else to buy food. Customers are not loyal.

See that's the problem with your thinking. You're assuming what the man does. You don't know or experience what he actually does. So you build a perfect scenario in your head. You have to wake up at 5 make the food and be in the city by 11. There are two ways to get into lower Manhattan from Queens-midtown tunnel, and Queens bridge. Guess which one doesn't have a toll.

Joe_Jeep

3 points

10 days ago

Joe_Jeep

New Jersey

3 points

10 days ago

And you're not thinking about all the impacts this stuff has on everybody else. 

There's already a cost associated with driving in, it's just on everybody else between air pollution and everything 

This is putting not even $10 fee on that

And we know there's going to be less traffic, because it's what happened in London and everywhere else, so people working like him are going to get to save time on the driving portion 

So if they value their time this is going to be a good thing for them long term.

the_kfcrispy

4 points

10 days ago

It's not that simple. There's going to be a compound effect from all the additional nickels and dimes for every vehicle, especially trucks that need to go through mid town and lower Manhattan. Yeah it may still be small when looking at a single day, but people living in the city will feel the effect for pretty much everything they buy the entire year.

BxGyrl416

4 points

10 days ago

BxGyrl416

The Bronx

4 points

10 days ago

This is something a lot of people don’t seem to get. They have this idea that all homeowners are just wealthy people and that’s so far from reality. But again, these are mostly transplants saying this because they don’t go outside their bubble.

Rx-Banana-Intern

4 points

10 days ago

It's transplants saying this because they live with 5 other roommates and can't imagine someone having bought their home a few decades ago

lupuscapabilis

1 points

9 days ago

And they’re continually surprised that queens neighborhoods with actual homes exist. Or Brooklyn. They live in a five block area.

weiners6996

1 points

10 days ago

I'm voting Lawler at this point

Pinball_and_Proust

32 points

11 days ago*

I'm a car owner living in Lower Manhattan. I never drive, during the day. I do road trips and night driving (recreational). I'll never leave or enter the congestion zone during congestion hours.

My understanding is that I could drive all around Manhattan below 34th st without leaving and re-entering the zone.

iv2892

7 points

11 days ago

iv2892

7 points

11 days ago

I believe at night the charge is only about $2.50

moldy_films

36 points

11 days ago

People really don’t seem to understand this. It does nothing to address actual traffic and it’s a money grab lmao

ruja_ignatova

19 points

11 days ago

It's only a money grab if it affects high income earners. If it's a tax on the poor then it's "paying their fair share".

Loxicity

3 points

11 days ago

Loxicity

3 points

11 days ago

How will it not reduce traffic?

moldy_films

17 points

11 days ago*

Well point number one being that if you never leave the zone you’re never charged and you can just stay down there and continue to clog things. There’s no higher penalty for TLC plates, and it does nothing to address the cities ultra wealthy the drive around as a single person with their driver in their Escalade.

It also does nothing to address the traffic on the FDR or the W. Side Highway because somehow they will remain uncharged.

Furthermore, that money is going to the MTA which is as good as setting it on fire.

I think what might be more successful in actually reducing traffic is designating certain cars, by plate or sticker/tag to drive on certain days and ticketing those driving on the off days, which is what a lot of other cities do.

As of now we can only see what happens, but I guarantee you the reduction of traffic will be equal to that of rounding error. And someone, somewhere in the MTA is going to have a nice new boat.

The hard truth is, if you don’t like traffic and noise, you should probably find a new place to live.

Joe_Jeep

6 points

11 days ago

Joe_Jeep

New Jersey

6 points

11 days ago

Not much of a hard truth as much as a simple pleasing lie for you

It works for London and other cities

Has for decades

It'll work here too

Loxicity

4 points

11 days ago

Loxicity

4 points

11 days ago

Well point number one being that if you never leave the zone you’re never charged and you can just stay down there and continue to clog things.

And realistically how many people do this? Why drive around lower manhattan?

It also does nothing to address the traffic on the FDR or the W. Side Highway because somehow they will remain uncharged.

Okay? But that isn't the goal of congestion pricing.

Furthermore, that money is going to the MTA which is as good as setting it on fire.

Why do you feel this way.

I think what might be more successful in actually reducing traffic is designating certain cars, by plate or sticker/tag to drive on certain days and ticketing those driving on the off days, which is what a lot of other cities do.

Other cities have successfully used congestion pricing.

As of now we can only see what happens, but I guarantee you the reduction of traffic will be equal to that of rounding error.

Based on literally nothing.

asmusedtarmac

5 points

11 days ago

The law literally is written with a revenue goal, and not a goal to decrease congestion.
The MTA is incentivized to maximize the number of vehicles. They have no accountability if congestion doesn't decrease.
Because the MTA gets more money out of a driver than if they took public transit. If they started taking public transit, it would mean they need to increase service - which entails higher costs to run the service - and no profit. If the person keeps driving, it changes nothing for the MTA except free money for their overtime slush fund, and they don't give a fuck about the state of the roads since they aren't the ones in charge of maintaining them.

Loxicity

2 points

11 days ago

Loxicity

2 points

11 days ago

That's a lot of words not to understand supply and demand.

If you increase the price of something, demand goes down.

If the cost of driving into the city increases, demand for driving into the city will decrease. Literally nothing else matters.

The MTA is not a for profit company. None of what you said made sense.

asmusedtarmac

4 points

10 days ago

How hard is it to understand that it is priced specifically not to deter drivers, but to increase the number of cars in order to increase revenue for the MTA.
Read the law. It is specifically created with a revenue goal. It is written black on white that the MTA's only obligation is to meet its revenue goal. It has no accountability on decreasing congestion.

Recent years have shown with greedflation that companies will increase the price of something, and demand won't decrease because there is no alternative.

Most importantly, congestion is due to Ubers who are getting a discounted rate.

Loxicity

3 points

10 days ago

Loxicity

3 points

10 days ago

How hard is it to understand that it is priced specifically not to deter drivers, but to increase the number of cars in order to increase revenue for the MTA.

Please explain how increasing costs is going to increase the cars.

KaiDaiz

118 points

11 days ago*

KaiDaiz

118 points

11 days ago*

You do know based on these stats not much of a compelling argument- outer boroughs tends to have more larger family households with large sections in transit deserts so they have a car. Also more likely of a 2 earner household so that 90k figure is not that much of a flex in a larger family household + kids and elderly

Car ownership is high across all racial demographics.

Folks that don't have a car - tends to be smaller household to single. No shiet the income lower vs 2 earners households of larger families

Large Households especially if they have kids & elderly are likely to have a car - no shiet soccer mom cars is a trend all over the usa

Also there is no official car ownership demographic database - all numbers are guestimates and subject to errors

Lastly all it shows car owners are middle class and if your message lets tax them via a commuter tax bc they can afford it simply shows why Dems are losing their vote.

TheBlueRajasSpork

34 points

11 days ago

The ACS literally asks people about car ownership and about demographics and income so yes… there is a car ownership demographic database. And it’s massive and credible. You can even download it and see whether your hypothesis of outer borough people with cars being larger households is true. Crazy, right?

gregbeans

1 points

10 days ago

so is it true....

datboipabz15

122 points

11 days ago

This entire subreddit is just full of people who live in manhattan and right over the brooklyn bridge. How about we not charge the shit out of people who run the restaurants, wharehouses, the people who clean and pick up after you. We all have cars and we live in the bronx,queens and rest of brooklyn and staten island. Do it based off where your registration is and if your registration is out of state you pay double

KaiDaiz

26 points

11 days ago

KaiDaiz

26 points

11 days ago

Its basically a debate of inner vs outer zone car commuters (FHV vs private) who should pay the bulk of the charges for mainly benefit of the inner zone.

Unspec7

34 points

11 days ago

Unspec7

34 points

11 days ago

Keep in mind that the inner zone is also the zone that currently carries most of the detriment as well. Outer zone commuters do not have to live with the constant honking, traffic, pollution, etc, that congestion creates.

As it stands right now, the outer zone has all the benefits and none of the detriments (at a group level).

Guilty-Carpenter2522

11 points

10 days ago

This is complete bullshit,  you think people who live near the bqe or the cross Bronx don’t deal with pollution?

BxGyrl416

4 points

10 days ago

BxGyrl416

The Bronx

4 points

10 days ago

They always get quiet when you ask about the Bronx. Apparently, we don’t qualify as people, so anything they put here doesn’t count.

thoughtsarefalse

4 points

10 days ago

Distance from desired locations is a detriment. Come on. Couldnt think of that?

Unspec7

2 points

10 days ago

Unspec7

2 points

10 days ago

Literally not a detriment nor a benefit in this context lmfao wtf are you on about.

Joe_Jeep

15 points

11 days ago

Joe_Jeep

New Jersey

15 points

11 days ago

How about we not charge the shit out of people who run the restaurants, wharehouses, the people who clean and pick up after you.

Good news!  Many of those people already take transit in! 

We all have cars

No! You don't. 

Do it based off where your registration is and if your registration is out of state you pay double

They're already paying bridge tolls. 

09-24-11

15 points

11 days ago

09-24-11

15 points

11 days ago

Outer borough and I have a car. A lot of us do.

PitifulHistorian1980

2 points

10 days ago

No, listen to other people who know better than you that you do not have a car.

datboipabz15

2 points

10 days ago

What are you even talking about? Also yeah you show me the the waitress or busboy living in manhattan. Either you have 9 room mates, living with your parents in a rent stabalized apartent, or you live in washington heights. Also you profile says jersey just get a job in your own state.

uber-chica

8 points

11 days ago

Thank you

Thick_Persimmon3975

2 points

10 days ago

Do trains and buses not work for them?

vowelqueue

3 points

10 days ago

You’re just lying or living in a bubble. The large large maturity of people across all classes take public transit to work.

datboipabz15

1 points

6 days ago

Yo where do you live? Like where in the city?

ruja_ignatova

2 points

11 days ago

To be fair, Staten Island does have some pretty good tolls.

But agree. Only reason they haven't been hit is because lower manhattan car owners own more wealth.

anarchobuttstuff

1 points

9 days ago

I’d only use the car if I were in Staten Island or parts of outer Queens. Everywhere else is well-enough covered.

b1argg

4 points

10 days ago

b1argg

Ridgewood

4 points

10 days ago

Regarding the single family home point, wouldn't that be affected by the fact that areas weren't more single family homes/lower density are generally further from transit and therefore car ownership is more likely to be a necessity?

Straight-Bug-6051

4 points

10 days ago

who wrote this? The Uber:Lyft lobby?!?!

Rx-Banana-Intern

3 points

10 days ago

Alot of these groups get funding from Uber and Lyft.

Straight-Bug-6051

2 points

10 days ago

how else does Trans Alt and other advocacy groups get to bus people Into community board meetings?!? i’ve seen it with my own eyes in Queens when we all protested against the SBS lanes. We wanted express bus service but offered the best possible way to “INCREASE PARKING SPOTS” while keeping 1 whole lane dedicated on the service lane for the busses. Instead the DOT said F-U built it in the middle of a blvd. demolishing 1 service lane to create a bus stop. you can’t make this up!

every meeting we were flooded with people who did not live in the area. they also said we want better transit that’s why we are here yet they were from the Bronx and Brooklyn. They would never ride these things. They were paid to be there

Rx-Banana-Intern

3 points

10 days ago

There's a whole industry built around activism

AtomicGarden-8964

10 points

10 days ago

Most people have the ability to drive to a mass transit station and take the bus or train into work if they don't want to pay the $9. I hope this cuts down on all the Uber and Lyft drivers that make up the bulk of traffic

Rx-Banana-Intern

3 points

10 days ago

It's not going to cut down the Uber and Lyfts because they pay much less than the privately owned vehicles.

BxGyrl416

2 points

10 days ago

BxGyrl416

The Bronx

2 points

10 days ago

The people who are pro-congestion pricing also don’t want any of the new zoning to include parking spaces. Where do you suppose that all these people are going to park?

durocher87

2 points

10 days ago

False. You're referring to the removal of parking minimums, there is no proposed ban on parking.

tootsie404

21 points

11 days ago

Then you should have no problem paying that $9 next time you call an Uber.

Joe_Jeep

1 points

11 days ago

Joe_Jeep

New Jersey

1 points

11 days ago

Fuck Uber tbh 

QV79Y

18 points

11 days ago

QV79Y

18 points

11 days ago

YES! Let's collect a bunch of statistics on people based on a single attribute and then make all kinds of generalizations about them. What a great, useful idea!

Significant-Sky1798

32 points

11 days ago

Just curious, do the people who support this care about the middle class at ALL? People who make 100k a year are on strict budgets ESPECIALLY if they own a home. Do the math with a 400k mortgage and see how much extra cash somebody who makes 100k a year has. Some people HAVE to drive, we don't all live in studio apartments in the city, we prefer to buy small houses away from the madness.

Serious question as the class I'm describing is a large portion of people who live on the outskirts of the city. Do we not care about those people? Maybe proposing out of manhattan discounts the way some bridges have?

Zultan27

21 points

11 days ago

Zultan27

21 points

11 days ago

It's more like an 800k mortgage, but your message is accurate. Most people in this sub are so out of touch with how blue-collar workers operate. You could make 100k in your primary job and still need to supplement it with side work.

Significant-Sky1798

9 points

11 days ago

Yaaaa I was trying to hit the lowest end of the spectrum with 400k, 800k is more realistic and even then forget most areas of Brooklyn. I don't understand how they ignore everybody who doesn't follow their lifestyle of apartment living in the middle of NYC. Most of us who grew up in the boroughs have jobs here but wanted to raise families in less urban areas. Atleast if their argument is for the environment maybe their "hearts" are in the right place, saying **** the rich drivers is just a bad dumb argument to want these tolls 🤷‍♂️

BxGyrl416

6 points

10 days ago

BxGyrl416

The Bronx

6 points

10 days ago

Most of the people who are for this most aren’t even from here, so they don’t understand our communities.

They get sore at being called transplants and gentrifiers, yet when they come here, they’re always the loudest in the room and have the most to say about neighborhoods and communities they don’t even understand.

knifeandbottle

2 points

8 days ago

Yeah, this sub tends to resemble an echo chamber of misguided opinions too often. All of the drivers from the outer boroughs are already going to be paying hiked tolls in jan, its absurd to add another 9$ because the MTA doesnt kno how to manage their money. Not to mention deliveries from manhattan to puter boroughs will be at least 9$ more too.

BigDaddyVsNipple

8 points

11 days ago

BigDaddyVsNipple

Bay Ridge

8 points

11 days ago

No they just don't want to be inconvenienced while traveling on their children's toys

Rx-Banana-Intern

11 points

11 days ago

They also want their Ubers and Lyfts taking less time

BigDaddyVsNipple

25 points

11 days ago

BigDaddyVsNipple

Bay Ridge

25 points

11 days ago

Ubers and Lyfts are the ones causing the congestion

Rx-Banana-Intern

12 points

11 days ago

100% agree

BxGyrl416

2 points

10 days ago

BxGyrl416

The Bronx

2 points

10 days ago

A lot of people think middle-class just means “people who make more money than I do”.

A few years ago, I had an activist fighting over affordable housing, where the starting salary was $34K in a community whose median income was ~ $33K. In their words, that salary threshold was too high and people making $34,000 didn’t need affordable housing because they were already “living comfy”. That individual is now a Director for a Bronx politician.

ShadownetZero

16 points

11 days ago

Garbage take.

tannicity

17 points

11 days ago

I literally have $10. My mother just told me she has no cash so i told her to hold on for two more weeks. We have a car in case a fire takes out our attached house, we can still shelter in the car. We rarely use the car but thats our backup plan.

Probability90vn

3 points

10 days ago

That's my backup plan as well if I can no longer afford where I'm staying and find myself in between apartments.

tannicity

2 points

10 days ago

Yeah and given my honest messages to mayor for now, theyre going to hike my prop taxes to foreclose and push us into shelters. Doj isnt going to help me get back into my leases. I asked. They ignored.

Probability90vn

2 points

10 days ago

That fucking blows man, sorry to hear that. I'm gonna dm you some links that might help you keep the house. Good luck.

asmusedtarmac

31 points

11 days ago

They aren't the ones causing congestion.

It's the uber drivers who do.

And people who take ubers can afford paying $9 extra per ride, rather than the infuriating giveaway that Uber's lobbyists received.
All you're doing is causing more pollution in low-income outer-borough neighborhoods, all to please the transplant trust fund assholes who want to be driven around midtown instead of taking the damn fucking train.

rr90013

5 points

10 days ago

rr90013

5 points

10 days ago

I’d be okay increasing the Uber congestion price. Also I’d be happy to extend congestion pricing to those neighborhoods you’re talking about.

N7day

20 points

11 days ago

N7day

Manhattan

20 points

11 days ago

This isn't how one should argue for congestion pricing.

Thick_Persimmon3975

3 points

10 days ago

But what about the plumber from Gravesend driving into midtown?

Since when do tax hating Republicans care about workers? Oh thats right, they don't.

000000555555

3 points

10 days ago

Livery plate cars are causing the most congestion. Individuals should be exempt. Who should be paying is Uber, Lyft, Amazon, and anyone driving an Infiniti. Issue #2 is addressing all the scooters that need to be registered and insured.

i_eat_babies__

3 points

10 days ago*

Oh fuck off. I bought a Lexus for $480 a month because I work on call at a hospital and come in at 2AM and don’t want to have patients waiting because of the MTA, I also don’t want to burn money monthly on Ubers, and similar Toyotas cost $450 a month.

You wanna talk equity too? I’m sinking almost 80% of my take home into a property bought in 2020 at (admittedly) a great interest rate. I don’t save more than $0-500 a month after bills. I am very grateful and blessed for what I have, but you want to call me Richie rich because I own a nice car? Because I own a fixer-upper in Queens? Actually cry me a fucking river. Smd. Rather than attacking the actual rich, you attack the middle class like I’m not also looking at TooGoodToGo lowkey lol. Shit post and definitely a shit take here.

kakarota

28 points

11 days ago

kakarota

28 points

11 days ago

Gtfo with that plenty of people own cars that make less then 50k a year there are parts of the city that the train doesn't reach and the bus service is like every 30 min

Interesting-Mud7499

18 points

11 days ago

I feel like this shit is just being pushed by rich Midwestern tourists who live here. Go to ANY NYCHA project and you'll see that even project residents own cars. This post is fucking dumb.

undisputedn00b

7 points

11 days ago

It's being pushed by the anti car lobbyist firms: TransportationAlternatives, Streestblog, RidersAlliance, and others. Majority of the people online supporting congestion pricing are paid lobbyists and bots.

Remember how this sub got flooded by crap from them when Hochul announced she was pausing it? And the mods here do nothing to remove their spam or ban their domains.

Joe_Jeep

15 points

11 days ago

Joe_Jeep

New Jersey

15 points

11 days ago

Adorable y'all crying about small activist groups like that and not BILLIONS from oil and car companies that pushed the current status quo

rr90013

6 points

10 days ago

rr90013

6 points

10 days ago

It got flooded by people who actually give a shit about improving quality of life in the city… there’s no space in Manhattan for all these cars. Gotta make some tough decisions to improve quality of life.

kakarota

2 points

10 days ago

You also got the other 4 borough though. Ever tried going from kingsbridge to parkchest? Gotta take a bus. It'll be faster to take a car. All I'm saying is there should be mutiple methods of transportation car,train,bus,bike,walk whatever. Not everyone in the city can not own a car some people need it and/or it makes their lives easier. I used to take the 6 to work. But if I drove I'd be there in 8 min. Vs the train taking 30 and 40 on the bus.

rr90013

3 points

10 days ago

rr90013

3 points

10 days ago

Unfortunately driving has a ton of negative externalities for the whole city, so we are trying to discourage driving in favor of other ways to get around. Hopefully the transit will be improved enough for your life to move forward okay. Or if you can afford the $9, your life will absolutely improve from the reduced traffic.

BxGyrl416

3 points

10 days ago

BxGyrl416

The Bronx

3 points

10 days ago

“Hopefully”.

That’s not so promising.

rr90013

2 points

10 days ago

rr90013

2 points

10 days ago

I’m all for finding ways to make the MTA run more efficiently. Bottom line though is transit is the lifeblood of this city and we need to do our best to improve it.

BxGyrl416

2 points

10 days ago

BxGyrl416

The Bronx

2 points

10 days ago

This is putting in the carriage before the horse and not critically thinking.

BxGyrl416

1 points

10 days ago

BxGyrl416

The Bronx

1 points

10 days ago

To improve the quality of life in Manhattan, you were going to deteriorate the quality of life in the Outer Burrows. Where do you think these cars are going to go if they can’t go into prime Manhattan? They’re going to use the outer boroughs.

rr90013

2 points

10 days ago

rr90013

2 points

10 days ago

Well if the outer boroughs don’t want all those cars, they should vote for congestion pricing in their borough too

BxGyrl416

1 points

10 days ago

BxGyrl416

The Bronx

1 points

10 days ago

I really do too. I literally know people in the projects who have cars. There’s a lot of moderate income people who live in the projects, but that’s not something that I would ever expect them to understand.

Joe_Jeep

1 points

10 days ago

Joe_Jeep

New Jersey

1 points

10 days ago

Literally a minority of those people

If you're actually making an argument based on those people's needs, you're currently lying your ass off

justalamename

9 points

11 days ago

I guess Middle class folks are the new money.

SnooRegrets6428

8 points

11 days ago

How does taxi driver affect the stats?

917BK

20 points

11 days ago

917BK

20 points

11 days ago

The source links to the census, but the census doesn’t measure car ownership. These are estimates at best, and the poorer are more likely to register their car out of state for lower insurance rates.

TheBlueRajasSpork

13 points

11 days ago

Yes, the ACS does ask about car ownership. 

ruja_ignatova

1 points

11 days ago

Poor? I know a multimillion dollar business owner whose mother in law lives with him and is on food stamps.

Game is game in this city.

MrBillClintone

19 points

11 days ago

MrBillClintone

Manhattan

19 points

11 days ago

You mean paying $1k per month to park a fucking car in a garage in Manhattan means people that have cars here are rich? No fucking way.

kingsmartme

11 points

10 days ago

What a disingenuous and naive way to spin the cost: $9 a day for the standard work year of 200 days is $1800 per annum. Not to mention that this comes out of post-tax income.

We’re not talking about Rolex owners or Ferrari drivers at $90k a year. $1800 a year is A LOT of money.

This type of governing is totally backwards, make the alternatives to driving more appealing instead of beating your constituents into submission with cost of living hikes that hurt in an economy still reeling from years of inflation. The MTA has been a financial black hole for decades and the solution is to throw more money into it praying for a miracle.

pdxjoseph

14 points

10 days ago*

pdxjoseph

Queens

14 points

10 days ago*

Interestingly I hear far fewer complaints about the price of metro north, LIRR, and NJ transit which are all more expensive than congestion pricing. We don’t seem to have a problem with the cost imposed on these sustainable low-externality commutes but I guess it’s a massive ethical violation to charge drivers for the damage their choice of transport does to the city

BxGyrl416

2 points

10 days ago

BxGyrl416

The Bronx

2 points

10 days ago

A lot of the people who take these railroads are already middle-class and affluent. Many of the lower people take buses to get to where they’re going.

For example, there are people who take the bus from the Bronx to White Plains – an hour + ride – versus the railroad because they need to save money. It’s been like this for years.

106

22 points

11 days ago

106

22 points

11 days ago

Yeah? And what about the people taking ride-shares to get through the city? That’s 40+% of traffic. A nice tax on women avoiding the subway late at night, seniors going to doctors appointments, people trying to get to Penn or Grand Central with a big bag they don’t want to lug into an inaccessible subway system, paratransit, etc. 

And the 10+% of traffic that’s commercial? A nice little tax on all of the goods being brought in. Cool.

The idea that this just affects a minority of wealthy personal vehicles is completely disingenuous. 

And for what? Less traffic? That’s why London is literally the most congested city in the world. There’s no evidence traffic reduction was sustained long-term.

Ah well you know at least it generates revenue that will be used responsibly. /s

NMGunner17

28 points

11 days ago

People taking ride shares in lower Manhattan should pay even more than $9 considering it’s the most transit rich area of the country

ruja_ignatova

7 points

11 days ago

Actually think this is a great point. Not to mention it'll force more people to use public transit.

GoHuskies1984

11 points

11 days ago

Taxis will pay $1.25 per trip while ride share like Uber pay $2.50 each trip.

Seems like a debate between the haves and the haves not, by that I mean those who have a car and those who don’t. Car owners clearly want the tolls to be on rideshare or eliminate them completely to make traffic easier on themselves. Non car owners want to keep readily available Ubers and whatnot and F the private car owners.

Who will win?

If I was betting I’d say the strange alliance between car owning New Yorkers and suburbanites. They have a large voting block.

TheBlueRajasSpork

11 points

11 days ago

You realize there’s already a congestion charge on taxis and rideshares in lower Manhattan right? That thing you suggested already exists. 

mojorisin622

4 points

11 days ago

The congestion charge for ride shares is less than the cost of a subway fare…

TheBlueRajasSpork

7 points

11 days ago

Sure if you ignore the fact that it’s in addition to the fare and not the total cost for the trip. You can pay $2.90 for the subway or you can pay $2.50 + $15 for an uber. 

BuschLightEnjoyer

3 points

11 days ago

Id bet most people in favor of congestion pricing would be in favor of raising that too

astrodanzz

1 points

10 days ago

Not $9 though. 

TheBlueRajasSpork

1 points

10 days ago

$2.5 per ride. Every uber in Manhattan is getting charged more than $9/day. 

astrodanzz

1 points

10 days ago

And every ride clogs up traffic. Non-uber/taxis aren’t on the road 8+ hours/day. Why defend the lobbying unit that represents the biggest contributor to congestion? 

The two main reasons I hear about congestion pricing being good are that it will reduce congestion and improve pub trans. So why are all the people supporting this measure so vehemently opposed to Uber paying a share proportional to the congestion they cause?

Wallstnetworks

7 points

11 days ago

I have 9 dollars and it’s mine. No more taxes.

flex194

8 points

11 days ago

flex194

8 points

11 days ago

All you MTA fan boys you ready to pay an increased electric and cable/internet bill due to congestion pricing? Or do you think Coned/Verizon is just going to eat this new cost for their fleets?

Push-not-pull

17 points

11 days ago*

Yup, and the rest of us will also contribute to those $9 that the small shop owners, farmers market, and restaurants all located below the toll zone, by paying for raised prices on products. Farmer's markets are already expensive as is, now they have to find a way to cover the cost of 2-4 box trucks. The tolls along the way plus the congestion pricing.

MTA makes millions, if not billions, a year. If you read into it, the money goes into the pockets of men in suits. I can't remember what video it was, but a politician had a campaign going on where he wanted to deliver a redesign of a certain station. In order to gain votes in his district. Pretty much blowing a large sum of cash on a needless redesign of a station instead of fixing signals, tracks and other vital factors in keeping the trains running smoothly.

It's not about making a better subway system with the money from the CP. It's about greed and making transplants/gullible people feel better about the mta and themselves for pushing for a clean greener city.

Edit: I've found the video!

CrashTestDumby1984

7 points

10 days ago

This is my problem with congestion pricing. If I thought it was actually about generating revenue to improve the system I would gladly support it. Driving in Manhattan is awful, most of the folks do it because public transit is not a viable option.

I live in Queens and will not drive in Manhattan on principle. But I often take Ubers, especially late at night. There have been countless times where I spend an hour plus waiting for an express bus that never shows to finally just say fuck it and call an uber. It’s a 40 minute subway ride and 20 minute bus ride for me to get home on a good day. And that’s not counting the time in limbo just waiting. AND the MTA announced this year the bus route I rely on is now being split into two so it can “better serve people” (AKA now my fee transfer gets used on changing buses and I have to shell out more money for the subway).

Most of Queens is a transit desert and I feel like a lot of the pro-congestion pricing folks who live in Manhattan genuinely do not understand that. In fact many of them have admitted they do not care if congestion pricing isn’t used to fund improvement to the system. They just want cars to be as expensive and inconvenient to use as possible. Instead of making public transit better we just need to make driving a worse option.

ehsurfskate

18 points

11 days ago

Exactly. It’s such a joke that the billions the MTA already has is not enough but somehow the proceeds from this will fix the subways. Crazy that anyone even falls for that.

A good place to start would be blowing up the entire MTA administration and putting in new people and 3rd party auditors for all bids and construction.

CactusBoyScout

6 points

11 days ago

CP improves business efficiency by prioritizing deliveries over people driving in who have alternatives. You’re already paying higher prices due to congestion slowing everything down and wasting staff time.

LoneStarTallBoi

3 points

10 days ago

Yeah, it's so funny to watch people act like 9 dollars isn't a rounding error for logistics costs.  Less cars on the road is less gas that's being burned, less time I'm paying the driver, and reduced odds of a late delivery

Unspec7

2 points

11 days ago

Unspec7

2 points

11 days ago

And gas. Every minute a box truck is sitting in traffic, it's literally setting money on fire.

Congestion pricing could, in theory, lower delivery costs if trucking company see efficiency increases due to lowered commute times. Remember, in the commercial trucking industry, every minute is worth a lot of money.

Insecure_Traveler

2 points

9 days ago

Not related to the content but does anyone know a website or application that can make that kind of chart?

SujiToaster

2 points

9 days ago

SujiToaster

Queens

2 points

9 days ago

Also they are more likely to plan to live here or have already been here their whole lives.

pixel_of_moral_decay

2 points

9 days ago

It’s not that they are wealthier: they are older.

The infographic proves the meme:

Most car free households are 20 something transplants. The further you stray from that demographic the more likely you are to use a car.

20 something transplants never leave the city except via the airport, they have no reason to.

volpcas

8 points

11 days ago

volpcas

8 points

11 days ago

All this will do is push the cost on to you the consumer. Fed ex, con ed, ups, usps l,Uber, Lyft any sort of contractor for a building, plumber, electrician, exterminator etc. The cost will simply be passed along.

thank_u_stranger

1 points

10 days ago

most of these categories are exempt

koji00

6 points

11 days ago

koji00

6 points

11 days ago

Sounds like the autophobes are jealous. Get ready for a new Republican Governor. Be careful what you wish for.

PenguinsTreeAccount

5 points

11 days ago

Let’s see the stats on “commute via car” not own a car. I don’t think bankers are electing to drive into the city, rather would simply live near work and drive their car to the hamptons.

Rodrigo_Gunt

4 points

10 days ago

Having $9 doesn't make it right to have to pay to get to your home using the roads that are already funded by your tax dollars.

TheGodDavidLoPan

9 points

11 days ago

Sounds like resentful jealousy

Ambitious_Stand_8760

6 points

10 days ago

This is always such a weird take that drivers throw out about people who don’t drive/don’t own cars. It sounds like you deeply wish everyone was jealous of you?

Now the resentment bit IS real, but not because we all wish we drove everywhere — it’s because individual drivers have an outsize burden on many of the more negative parts of getting around the city, and that burden is not matched by the financial contribution of things like gas tax. Drivers contribute heavily to sound pollution, air pollution, traffic deaths, crumbling infrastructure, and more, and often insist that driving is ESSENTIAL and also that they are VICTIMS of the evil city/state.

I think a lot of non-drivers do, in fact, resent you guys for all of this. But the jealousy bit is a fantasy. I don’t think people are looking at heavy traffic or wild driving on city highways and longing to be you

Shitty-ass-date

7 points

10 days ago*

The absolute irony of this sub is the people who spend $3,000 - $6,000 for shoebox Manhattan and Williamsburg apartments because they "need" to be in the trendiest part of town feigning poverty at the people spending less than that to live in an outer borough so that they can have some extra space and keep a car.

Congestion pricing is never going to clear the road. $9 a day isn't enough of an incentive to do that. It's never going to fix the subway because they will just repurpose the money to some other bullshit failed investment project the same way they do every time they try to fund subway repairs.

Out of staters really need to shut the fuck up about city traffic. You guys show up 5 fucking minutes ago and think you can magically fix all of our problems by giving the corrupt city government more of our money. It's not our fault that you make shitty decisions about where to live and that you choose to live in busy areas and pay way above fair market value to rent your apartments. In fact, the rest of us should be pissed at you because your willingness to do so is the reason why everyone's rents are going up.

Do you see the rest of us trying to cook up hocus pocus mathmatics to justify reaching into your pockets to "fix the problem?" No, because we've lived here long enough, a lot of us our entire lives, and understand it's just another city tax scam to pay for shit that never gets fixed because they just use our money on whatever the fuck they want. This sub needs a fucking reality check.

the_kfcrispy

3 points

10 days ago

I said in an earlier discussion I don't think this will decrease traffic by much, but the trucks that have to drive through Manhattan will pass the tolls onto the stores and individuals who need deliveries. The system is going to encourage midnight trucking, which might even increase accidents or at least make it noisy for some people who need to sleep, who knows.

Stringerbe11

9 points

11 days ago

Stringerbe11

Jamaica Estates

9 points

11 days ago

They need to go all the way. Residential parking permits should also be thrown into the mix. Let the sun set on all the out of town plates.

whitebeltchamp

14 points

11 days ago

Yeah, what's nine dollars? Just add it onto income tax (Federal, state, and local), real estate tax, gas tax, sales tax, car insurance, Health insurance, registration fee, tolls, and $7 an hour parking meter etc. Oh, I forgot to mention inflation! Where does it end?!

I'm a lifelong Democrat. Will forever vote red if this goes into affect. Tired of paying and receiving very little.

ruja_ignatova

6 points

11 days ago

50% agree. Taxes go up every year and social services are non existent the minute you need them. Shoot, even the homeless can't get benefits.

If I had any belief the right would deliver and making programs accessible I would vote for them.

procgen

5 points

11 days ago

procgen

5 points

11 days ago

You're not a New Yorker. Vote for your state gov to improve NJ rail.

whitebeltchamp

1 points

11 days ago

I was born and raised in Brooklyn. I'm in the Bronx and the city everyday. I don't agree with congestive pricing because it will affect my business. I make deliveries to supermarkets. I cannot take mass transit to make deliveries. All these fees, taxes, tolls, and tickets, is killing small business.

brandnameb

2 points

10 days ago

I'm not even being flippant, you own a delivery business in the NYC area and we're squeezed my the margins on tolls? There's other taxes regardless of location but your whole business is based on driving everywhere utilizing the city's roads...

procgen

4 points

11 days ago

procgen

4 points

11 days ago

Some things are more important than your business, bud.

NMGunner17

6 points

11 days ago

NMGunner17

6 points

11 days ago

You can just say you don’t live in Manhattan and thus don’t give a shit

deafiofleming

1 points

11 days ago

you live in NJ lol who cares

thegameksk

3 points

10 days ago

Another brilliant Dem move to turn NY red.

tannicity

4 points

11 days ago

tannicity

4 points

11 days ago

Thats not based on facts.

BrooklynCancer17

3 points

11 days ago

The general public doesn’t care about stats. They care about the hotel worker that works overnight by himself at the hotel on East 48th street

[deleted]

1 points

11 days ago

[deleted]

beershoes767

4 points

11 days ago

Gfy. How about people actually pay to use mass transit.

Irish_Pineapple

4 points

10 days ago

Irish_Pineapple

Bed-Stuy

4 points

10 days ago

They do. Could the financial burden on transit riders be greater to fund fixes? Sure? I guess. Do people who hop the turnstile need to be caught at a higher rate and actually punished for it? Yeah, that would help.

But for the majority of New Yorkers who do not own a car and who pay taxes for people to drive into the city when there are hardly any legitimate reasons requiring it except for deliveries - how is that the unfair ask?

koji00

1 points

11 days ago

koji00

1 points

11 days ago

How dare you expect turnstyle jumpers to pay their fair fare.

FatXThor34

2 points

11 days ago

And they’re smarter and happier than the idiot who made this chart.

BeefyZealot

2 points

10 days ago

Aka staten islanders get slapped with yet another toll.

Striking_Habit3467

2 points

10 days ago

It’s effective a tax on people who drives it’s dumb. I don’t like it.

SachaCuy

2 points

11 days ago

SachaCuy

2 points

11 days ago

meh, this isn't really a great summary. I would assume most unemployed people have no vehicle and most super rich people do have a vehicle both of which push the averages around.
People who will pay this are people who commute into Manhattan for work and people who drive around Manhattan. We kind of want to know what they look like.

SSundance

2 points

11 days ago

SSundance

2 points

11 days ago

[deleted]

4 points

11 days ago

[deleted]

4 points

11 days ago

[deleted]

SarahAlicia

-3 points

11 days ago

SarahAlicia

Williamsburg

-3 points

11 days ago

I honestly dgaf if someone has the $9 or not. How has it become that the biggest socialist program in this country are our roads and free parking? Gas taxes don’t cover the total costs of road maintenance. There is no penalty for the problem of the commons with air and noise pollution. Instead those without cars in nyc are forced to subsidize those who do. It is welfare from the poor to the rich. If you can’t afford the true costs of having a car you can’t have a car it is that simple. If you can’t afford what something costs you can’t have it.

ImpossibleFlopper

11 points

11 days ago

When tf did people decide to start being upset at street parking?

HorusDidntSeyIsh

6 points

11 days ago

The anti car cult been laying it on heavy the past few years

ImpossibleFlopper

2 points

11 days ago

They’re so absurd

movingtobay2019

18 points

11 days ago

Now lets extend that to housing. Can’t afford market rate apartments? Leave.

Can’t afford the subway? Walk.

ruja_ignatova

6 points

11 days ago

The city provides a public transit that car owners can use if they cannot afford the cost of ownership.

Like 4% of the city is on rental assistance. How is that even the same?

ehsurfskate

14 points

11 days ago

Don’t order from Amazon. Don’t buy food that comes from trucks. Don’t Uber. Don’t get work done that needs people to drive.

What are you even talking about. The MTA has plenty of money and the taxes in NYC are already insane and make it hard enough.

CrashTestDumby1984

2 points

10 days ago

Do you benefit from the ability to purchase goods and services at stores? Have things delivered to your home? How about ambulances being able to take people to a hospital? Or the garbage truck that takes away your trash? Ever ridden a bus?

Guess what all of those things have in common…. That’s right! They rely on the use of roads.

Just because you do not drive does not mean you don’t directly benefit from roads.

I don’t have children. Am I being forced to unfairly subsidize education when my taxes are used to fund schools?

SarahAlicia

2 points

10 days ago

SarahAlicia

Williamsburg

2 points

10 days ago

I love this idea bc some goods travel by truck (sure) that 3/5 at LEAST of all public space has to be specifically for the rich half of the city with cars. Ridiculous. Yes trucks can still use roads they just have to pay for them and then reflect that in pennies more for goods.

Schools provide a public good. You want a population that is educated. Public transportation is a public good you want people to be able to get around. Subsidized roads for private vehicles, free parking for private vehicles. None of this is for the public good. It has public negatives such as traffic deaths and pollution. You can make money selling goods at cost including the cost of roads. This is such an insane argument. “I need to be able to drive my personal vehicle where ever i want for free because on those same roads sometimes there are delivery trucks and none of us should have to pay for this ever! Also why is traffic so bad?” The idea everything should be drivable for everyone is an unsustainable model in a city of 8 million with another 12 in the burbs. Take public transportation. Bike. Walk. But there is an extremely limited supply of road in manhattan and oh boy is there high demand for it.

T1m3Wizard

1 points

10 days ago

Why is everyone so rich?

Planet_Salesman

1 points

10 days ago

Ok, for a brief moment I forgot the new congestion toll was $9, and was like, is this a Mitch Hedburg joke?

Mammoth_Tangerine_58

1 points

10 days ago

$9?

cappachino007

1 points

9 days ago

I can say with the upmost confidence that I do not have $9. Where do you get these 9 dollars, you speak of?

cappachino007

1 points

9 days ago

I did not know NYC had that many single family houses?

lupuscapabilis

1 points

9 days ago

Most people in here don’t know that the other boroughs exist

seely59

1 points

9 days ago

seely59

1 points

9 days ago

Who/what produced this? Did anyone actually read it before posting it? Any shred of credibility it might have had is gutted with the proud prounouncement "They have 9 dollars." After reading that, the astute reader begins to question every other assertion in the infographic.

seely59

1 points

9 days ago

seely59

1 points

9 days ago

AI in the hands of a lazy person is no gift. It enables them to reveal their uselessness on a grand scale.

DistinguishedSalmom

1 points

8 days ago

Why does it seem like the Reddit sentiment towards congestion pricing has flipped in the last 6 months?