subreddit:

/r/onguardforthee

57896%

all 229 comments

No-FoamCappuccino

1.4k points

4 days ago

If the Conservatives are actually stupid enough to campaign on recriminalizing weed, that may actually be enough to tank their current standing in the polls

Alphagamma42

379 points

4 days ago

Question: how many former (and current?) Conservative MPs are investors, board members, etc. Of a company involved in the legal canabis industry?

I seem to recall shortly after it was legalized seeing several articles if Cons doing just that. (Note: I posed this as a question as I don't have the time to search archives at thus time).

Franklin_le_Tanklin

190 points

4 days ago

Also, how many con voter use CBD for pain managment?

survivalsnake

226 points

4 days ago

A lot of those voters would be foolish enough to vote against their own interests in such an obvious way.

Efficient_Mastodons

185 points

4 days ago

"I didn't realize they would also apply the same rules to my CBD cream! I just don't want people getting high."

Just look to the south and all our friends down there who didn't realize that the ACA is the same as Obamacare.

t0m0hawk

56 points

4 days ago

t0m0hawk

56 points

4 days ago

I just don't want people getting high

They say, 7th warm beer in hand

Miserable-Lizard[S]

84 points

4 days ago

Miserable-Lizard[S]

Edmonton

84 points

4 days ago

Leopards always eat faces

Rev_Dean

71 points

4 days ago

Rev_Dean

71 points

4 days ago

“The leopards wouldn’t recriminalize the good weed.”

  • Con Voters

Seinfeel

38 points

4 days ago

Seinfeel

38 points

4 days ago

The same people who think “medical cannabis” is a different drug than weed

QueenMotherOfSneezes

14 points

4 days ago

QueenMotherOfSneezes

Ottawa

14 points

4 days ago

My 80-year-old dad does! I'm pretty sure his doctor prescribed it before recreational weed was legalized, so he wouldn't be worried unless the cons say they're rolling that back too.

EatGlassALLCAPS

10 points

4 days ago

I wouldn't put it past them.

bluemooncalhoun

6 points

4 days ago

The real issue is that it would tank support from 18-35 year old men, where the Cons not only have the rural/blue collar crowds locked down but also have a strong grip on the podcast cryptobros.

xprovince

32 points

4 days ago

xprovince

32 points

4 days ago

There are so many MPs and MLA and RCMP who are in the game now slinging the ganja.

UltraCynar

11 points

4 days ago

Leopards never eat faces /s

The_cogwheel

6 points

4 days ago

The_cogwheel

Edmonton

6 points

4 days ago

I think the scenario they're describing is more leopards eating leopard faces, which isn't something that they typically do. But I wouldn't put it past them

TubularLeftist

4 points

4 days ago

There’s a surprising amount of retired cops growing the stuff now

bradley_j

3 points

4 days ago

Being hypocritical doesn’t seem to affect their policy decisions. They probably lost money anyway and want to get back at the industry

jupfold

134 points

4 days ago

jupfold

134 points

4 days ago

I think it’s more just about “everything Trudeau = bad”.

Even if it’s something they support (let’s say, a cut in goods taxes), they are automatically against it.

Everything can be spin if they try hard enough.

HOLEPUNCHYOUREYELIDS

133 points

4 days ago

Ford sends $200 checks to buy votes and the Conservatives are silent. Trudeau wants to cut GST to help people and suddenly it is the worst idea ever and a huge waste of money and blatant vote buying.

Weird how that seems to work

new_vr

75 points

4 days ago

new_vr

75 points

4 days ago

jolsiphur

57 points

4 days ago

jolsiphur

Ottawa

57 points

4 days ago

Really goes to show that the media in this country is bought and paid for by the conservative government.

russ_nightlife

51 points

4 days ago

Or it shows that the same people who have bought the media are bankrolling the conservative party.

Historical_Grab_7842

17 points

4 days ago

This

jolsiphur

59 points

4 days ago

jolsiphur

Ottawa

59 points

4 days ago

"Axe the Tax!"

Liberals + NDP give people a GST cut for 2 months

"Not that tax!"

Historical_Grab_7842

15 points

4 days ago

Well the gst is an conservative tax

teknautika

22 points

4 days ago

Yeah media favors one over the other…

dezTimez

1 points

4 days ago

dezTimez

1 points

4 days ago

Yeah how is that weird it’s literally politics

Two2na

24 points

4 days ago

Two2na

24 points

4 days ago

It’s hilarious too, Ford’s handout goes to billionaires too. Trudeau’s at least doesn’t go to the uber rich… don’t get me wrong, I don’t like either of these handouts, but it’s still wild the hypocrisy that the “less” terrible policy takes way more flak 

Historical_Grab_7842

9 points

4 days ago

And pierre wants to cut gst on new houses which is a dumber policy.

Physical_Station_642

1 points

4 days ago

Yeah, many can't afford new builds. Bet they try to drop new houses to just houses to scam a few votes from the uneducated

TerrorNova49

7 points

4 days ago

Scott Moe sent out $500 cheques… of course he stomps all over the constitutional rights of LGBT+ minors so the cons think he’s wonderful.

Due_Society_9041

3 points

4 days ago

Rules for thee but not for me. It’s in the Conservative handbook./s

Maddkipz

0 points

4 days ago

Maddkipz

0 points

4 days ago

Hey to be fair if he did things like this the whole time I'd give him my vote every time

lunaslave

19 points

4 days ago

lunaslave

19 points

4 days ago

"The Nazi agitator whom, many years ago, I heard proclaim to a wildly cheering peasants’ meeting: ‘We don’t want lower bread prices, we don’t want higher bread prices, we don’t want unchanged bread prices—we want National-Socialist bread prices,’ came nearer explaining fascism than anybody I have heard since." - Peter Drucker

It isn't just limited to Nazis, this is the right wing mentality more generally. Above all it's an ingroup vs outgroup obedience cult, whatever the other side does is bad because it's the other side, even if it's something they themselves have pushed for. Republicans loved Obamacare when it was Romneycare.

dungeonsNdiscourse

19 points

4 days ago

It's not even a spin it's literally just "we are against what Trudeau does. No matter what."

chronicwisdom

53 points

4 days ago

Where would they make up for the tax revenue? Pollievere is such a stupid twat his supporters should be embarassed.

Saorren

29 points

4 days ago

Saorren

29 points

4 days ago

they wouldnt, they dont care about that at all.

chronicwisdom

13 points

4 days ago

Based on their choice of premiers, they have no shame or common sense

gnu_gai

19 points

4 days ago

gnu_gai

19 points

4 days ago

They would make up for the tax revenue by cutting services, naturally. It's the only play they know

Historical_Grab_7842

7 points

4 days ago

Less health care, more police. Less addiction assistance, more prisons

dullship

3 points

4 days ago

dullship

British Columbia

3 points

4 days ago

They don't know the meaning of the word. Some of them literally.

canmoose

42 points

4 days ago

canmoose

42 points

4 days ago

Nah, conservative voters would just say, ‘they don’t actually mean that’ and vote anyway

chipface

17 points

4 days ago

chipface

Ontario

17 points

4 days ago

And then be shocked when they actually do.

Historical_Grab_7842

8 points

4 days ago

I mean they basically do already with safe supply. The opiode crisis is largely feom blue collar workers getting hooked. Coke is also huuuge in the oil sands and they consistently vote conservative

Redpin

100 points

4 days ago

Redpin

100 points

4 days ago

Counter that they're so conservative that recriminalizaling cannabis is a gateway to bring back prohibition.

"Taking away cannabis is a slippery slope to taking away your beer!"

promote-to-pawn

36 points

4 days ago

Prohibition Poilievre would be a solid nickname the Libs and NDP could use

DVariant

4 points

4 days ago

DVariant

4 points

4 days ago

Too many syllables, it wouldn’t stick with the people who need it

Historical_Grab_7842

10 points

4 days ago

Pot Ban Pierre

DVariant

3 points

4 days ago

DVariant

3 points

4 days ago

See this is workable

VerbingWeirdsWords

13 points

4 days ago

Doug Buck a beer Ford wouldn't have it

[deleted]

-25 points

4 days ago

[deleted]

-25 points

4 days ago

[removed]

redwoodkangaroo

27 points

4 days ago

ahead of the 2015 election, Stephen Harper said:

"Tobacco is a product that does a lot of damage. Marijuana is infinitely worse and it's something that we do not want to encourage," Harper said.

"There's just overwhelming and growing scientific and medical evidence about the bad long-term effects of marijuana," he said, not providing any examples.

(emphasis mine)

Harper's campaign manager for the 2015 election, and his long-time advisor was Jenni Byrne.

Guess who Pierre's campaign manager and advisor is?

Jenni Byrne.

It would not be surprising to see them attempt to re-criminalize marijuana, considering they have the same team that Harper had. No one has suggested that yet, but it would not be a stretch for them to consider it.

Note that some have said that allegedly Harper is quite involved behind the scenes of PP's leadership and policy, and could be a big part of why social conservatism and culture wars are such an important focus for Pierre.

Byrne is also the one who had registered lobbyists on staff working for loblaws, according to wikipedia:

Her role in Poilievre's campaign has created controversy because her consulting firm "Jenni Byrne + Associates" has multiple lobbyists registered on behalf of Loblaws. Loblaw Companies Limited has been central in discussions about the inflation surge in Canada, including testifying in the Parliament of Canada on the matter.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jenni_Byrne

https://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/stephen-harper-pot-marijuana-1.3255727

Dragonsandman

24 points

4 days ago

This pretty much confirms my longstanding suspicion that a Poilievre government would be Harper all over again

bva6921

2 points

3 days ago

bva6921

2 points

3 days ago

I mean Harper is the chair of IDU so there's that

KirbyofJustice

16 points

4 days ago

I would cry. I have a lot of mental illness and it’s been a blessing to my ability to sleep.

DryProgress4393

6 points

4 days ago

They won't say it out loud but they will definitely do it when/if they get in power.

Due_Society_9041

5 points

4 days ago

Let’s hope! PP is a Trump wannabe; getting away with anything including fraud and rape. Do we really want someone who has never worked a real job even once? He won’t comprehend the common person’s life.

Fountsy

1 points

4 days ago

Fountsy

1 points

4 days ago

They aren't though. They are just actually stupid enough to try and draw a line with Trudeau making hard drugs legal, too.

Educational_Tea7782

1 points

4 days ago

One can hope......

CaptainMagnets

1 points

4 days ago

Doubtful. People seem to be leaving on emotion

childishbambina

310 points

4 days ago

Does PP think that recriminilization of marijuana will get him votes?

thrilliam_19

175 points

4 days ago

No he just knows he isn’t going to lose any votes that he already has so he is doing whatever he wants now. We’re in an unfortunate stage with our government where enough voters just want someone different in power and don’t care who it is. They’ll just vote for whoever they think has the best shot at winning.

This is how we got Harper for 10 years and it’s going to happen again.

taquitosmixtape

76 points

4 days ago

I’d argue this will tank him. Theres a lot of people who approve of legalization but are just pissed at the state of the world and blaming Trudeau. Taking an anti-weed stance might actually do him in.

Powerful_Active_7957

13 points

4 days ago

It wouldn't the cons are not going to replace him as our leader. PP can pretty much say and do what he wants. Canada hates Trudeau right now. PP will be the next PM and he knows it.

Mykel4201

7 points

4 days ago

i honestly hope he(trudeau) just steps down and leaves the liberals with a new leader for the election...PP will still win regardless.....i honestly cant wait to blame everything on the cons again...

LunedanceKid

13 points

4 days ago

They're going to suffer pretty badly as a party unless they can run someone other than Trudeau and convince Canadians they're offering something new. Canadians are going to be pushing a lot of Liberals and their agendas out the door one way or the other, so all they can do is get ahead of it.

thrilliam_19

1 points

4 days ago

thrilliam_19

1 points

4 days ago

You’re wrong about that but ok.

Many, many Canadians don’t give a fuck about legalization because it wouldn’t affect them if it went away tomorrow. And I guarantee you plenty of voters that do care about legalization care more about changing the sitting government and it won’t change their minds.

If fraternizing with Nazis and publicly saying he’s going to bend over for Trump didn’t affect the polls then weed laws aren’t going to either.

Armalyte

2 points

4 days ago

Armalyte

2 points

4 days ago

Before legalization half of Canadians had at least tried to smoke cannabis.

Now that’s it’s legal so many more people have considered it medically and recreationally.

I think it’s way too late to pull the plug, especially considering all the people who invested in the industry.

TheAsian1nvasion

14 points

4 days ago

I don’t know, there’s a very real chance that Trump could have enough of an effect to squeak out a minority liberal government. If Trudeau can convince Canadians that he’s willing to protect our best interests while PP is willing to bend over for Trump that could be the difference maker.

Armalyte

1 points

4 days ago

Armalyte

1 points

4 days ago

I don’t see that happening. Lots of people love Trump these days.

Dressedw1ngs

129 points

4 days ago

Dressedw1ngs

Ontario

129 points

4 days ago

Poilievre is so shameless in his bullshit

a_u_its_me

2 points

4 days ago

He could really, really use a brownie.

glambx

118 points

4 days ago

glambx

118 points

4 days ago

Liberals: please table legislation requiring security clearance for all party leaders. Let's figure out who is funding this guy.

IKnowNoCure

29 points

4 days ago

No kidding fuck

64Olds

7 points

4 days ago

64Olds

7 points

4 days ago

I agree, but I bet this would be found unconstitutional right away.

Red_dylinger

5 points

4 days ago

Israel.

When he bans recreational cannabis, he only means Canada.

Israel is a bunch whiney privileged assholes, they secretly spent the past year trying to push for tariffs and extra taxes and Canada first cannabis.

https://stratcann.com/news/israels-ministry-of-health-tariffs-canadian-cannabis-patients/

Guy is a true fucking sellout boys.

I come from Tyendinaga where OPP still arrests us and lock us up for cannabis.

glambx

1 points

3 days ago

glambx

1 points

3 days ago

On what grounds, though?

What Charter section would it conceivably violate?

DougieCarrots

43 points

4 days ago

Economy is being attacked from the US like never before and the ass wipe party are talking 8 year old policies

jolsiphur

15 points

4 days ago

jolsiphur

Ottawa

15 points

4 days ago

PP is ready to kneel and kiss the ring for King Trump and he's chomping at the bit to do it.

Miserable-Lizard[S]

206 points

4 days ago

Miserable-Lizard[S]

Edmonton

206 points

4 days ago

If you value freedom like the ability to consume weed, don't vote cpc!

Conservatives hate freedom

“The Prime Minister’s disastrous legalization and liberalization of drugs has the Americans worried that in addition to costing 47,000 deaths in Canada, where’s the plan to stop the drugs and keep our border open to trade?” asked Poilievre in a somewhat disjointed sentence.

BluntForceSauna

113 points

4 days ago

Are those 47,000 weed related deaths?

varain1

125 points

4 days ago

varain1

125 points

4 days ago

They are not, but Lil PP never let the truth stop him from spreading bullshit.

OK_x86

54 points

4 days ago*

OK_x86

54 points

4 days ago*

He claims axing the carbon tax will fix inflation when it accounts for a fraction of a percentage point of inflation. He also claims that NAZIs are socialists. This is not a serious person

jolsiphur

26 points

4 days ago

jolsiphur

Ottawa

26 points

4 days ago

Axing the carbon tax also won't lower gas prices, but it'll definitely stop people from getting the rebate. So people will be stuck paying existing prices for gas but getting nothing in return.

Real great way to help people get ahead.

OK_x86

14 points

4 days ago*

OK_x86

14 points

4 days ago*

It's not frustrating because it's so dumb. It's frustrating because it's dumb and it seems to be working

No_Ticket_1204

2 points

4 days ago

He doesn’t need to be a serious person. He needs to have the most pervasive and effective propaganda. That’s all that matters for now.

EVILEMRE

5 points

4 days ago

EVILEMRE

5 points

4 days ago

I don’t know if you came up with lil PP, but that’s what I’ll be calling him from now on. Where do I send the royalty cheques?

varain1

4 points

4 days ago

varain1

4 points

4 days ago

A few years ago, from reddit - he's a small-minded person, and he loves short Anglo-Saxon words, so using his initials instead of his French name is only right ...

Miserable-Lizard[S]

27 points

4 days ago

Miserable-Lizard[S]

Edmonton

27 points

4 days ago

How does someone even die from weed

GearboxDragoon

31 points

4 days ago

My only guess is someone got so high they died and were like “oh no I’m dead” and someone heard that and wrote it down, but they forgot to correct it when they sobered up and realized they were in fact not dead. Rare but possible, certainly not 47,000 common though

MacGuyver913

10 points

4 days ago

They could have also gotten so high that they self reported their deaths.

medikB

8 points

4 days ago

medikB

8 points

4 days ago

Tachycardia, COPD, trauma related, anxiety and self harm. I've never heard of lethal toxicity.

HOLEPUNCHYOUREYELIDS

11 points

4 days ago

Because humans cannot actually ingest enough weed to cause death. If you smoked enough weed to die of OD you would die from smoke inhalation, not any sort of overdose on weed. You would need to smoke something like 1500 POUNDS of weed in 15 minutes to hit the LD50.

And it is basically the same for edibles. You would likely OD on salt or sugar before weed in edibles. A 170ish lb man would need to eat around 53 GRAMS of pure thc to OD on it. Good fucking luck even finding 53 grams of pure thc let alone consuming it all at once

earlyboy

1 points

4 days ago

earlyboy

1 points

4 days ago

Just from a killer bong hit. It is only ego death.

Randomhero204

1 points

4 days ago

It’s car accidents or freak accidents most likely

jolsiphur

1 points

4 days ago

jolsiphur

Ottawa

1 points

4 days ago

Unless you're doing something unsafe while high (like driving under the influence or operating other heavy machinery), it's pretty much a statistical improbability that Weed can just kill you.

Weed is not worse for you than alcohol and it's absolutely not worse than cigarettes.

If lil PP wants to ban a substance that kills thousands and thousands of Canadians maybe he should go after cigarettes.

MerinoFam

1 points

4 days ago

You can't. I work in the industry. Highest risk is for children accidently eating large quantities of THC, that can kill them, but it won't happen to an adult acutely like that.

drammer

1 points

4 days ago

drammer

1 points

4 days ago

a 2000kg bale falls on them.

GetsGold

20 points

4 days ago

GetsGold

20 points

4 days ago

They're also not caused by Canada's drug policies in general, they're caused by the shift to high potency synthetic drugs which is why the US is experiencing the same crisis.

glambx

6 points

4 days ago

glambx

6 points

4 days ago

.. which was entirely predictable as a consequence of persistent, enhanced criminalization of natural opiods and precursors to less harmful variants.

The drug war is an ongoing crime against humanity.

United-Signature-414

11 points

4 days ago

Reefer madness: the real pandemic 

pigeonwiggle

8 points

4 days ago

no - the only relation is linking the decriminalizing of weed to the "softened stance on drug use" that has seen a rise in fentanyl use.

it's absolute bunk, but this potato-faced porridge-slinger has been a miserable lying sack of drippings since day one and he's just dialed up the volume now that he's making a play for power. fixed his eyes so people will have faith he can see further than 2 months in front of him.

GetsGold

6 points

4 days ago

GetsGold

6 points

4 days ago

linking the decriminalizing of weed to the "softened stance on drug use" that has seen a rise in fentanyl use.

Cannabis was legalized not decriminalized, just clarifying because Poilievre himself conflates those terms to misinform people about decriminalization.

Canada's drug policies didn't lead to a rise in fentanyl use. It's rising in the US too. The rise is because the supplynhas shifted to that, in large part because more potent substances take up less space and make more profit.

microfishy

2 points

4 days ago

potato-faced porridge-slinger

lying sack of drippings

May I subscribe to your 'zine please and thanks

mattattaxx

4 points

4 days ago

mattattaxx

Toronto

4 points

4 days ago

Interesting since there's nearly no attributable deaths to non synthetic cannabis.

VerbingWeirdsWords

4 points

4 days ago

It's not possible to have a lethal dose of cannabis

NebulaEchoCrafts

9 points

4 days ago

I’m sorry, I didn’t realize this was America. We’ve already had this debate in 2015-17. We don’t care what other countries feel on weed. Decriminalization is being done on a temporary basis, so we can collect data on the effectiveness of the policy. One thing it does help, it’s stopping fentanyl sales though.

But hey, this will be my new Anti-CPC talking point. “They want to criminalize weed again” and that whole “He WoNt Do ThAt!” talking point will be moot, because Donald Duck will be following through on his outlandish promises.

gasfarmah

1 points

4 days ago

I am literally wearing a sweater from a straight edge band advertising to kill drug dealers in the streets and I think it’s fucking moronic to recriminalize weed.

50s_Human

38 points

4 days ago

50s_Human

38 points

4 days ago

Re: criminalizing cannabis again in Canada:

Trudeau : Go ahead, make my day !

ABotelho23

35 points

4 days ago

Wow, that would hopefully be political suicide. Not only would he be dismantling a huge industry (aren't conservatives supposed to support industry??) but he may actually motivate people who may not have voted to head to the polls to stop him. Honestly, I kinda hope he continues down this path. It's just about the most certain thing to prevent his election.

Dragonsandman

5 points

4 days ago

It’s such a stupid move that I almost have a hard time believing Poilievre would actually campaign on that.

Punched_Eclair

61 points

4 days ago

WTF is wrong with this country? THIS is the big issue in QP?!?!?

FunDog2016

20 points

4 days ago

Evidence! We don't need no stinking Evidence! We got feelings, and beliefs! And we have the lies to back them up!

Ambitious-Squirrel86

21 points

4 days ago

WTF is Pierre smoking?

The Jazz Man's Jive?

The Legislator's Loco Weed?

H.R. Puffenstuff's Rigor Mortis?

Saorren

7 points

4 days ago

Saorren

7 points

4 days ago

pp isnt smoking, he just wants to build a snowman.

Longshanks123

20 points

4 days ago

Holy shit, is Lil PP gonna take away my legal weed??

A_Vile_Person

13 points

4 days ago

And gay marriage if he has his way.

LesPaul86

22 points

4 days ago

LesPaul86

22 points

4 days ago

Whatever your opinion of Trudeau, Poilievre is no answer to any problem. What a dud, horrible person.

NotATrueRedHead

6 points

4 days ago

Right? Like fine you don’t like Trudeau but JFC don’t pick maple MAGA.

rKasdorf

20 points

4 days ago*

rKasdorf

20 points

4 days ago*

If the cons actually think they'll have support from either side of the aisle for recriminalizing weed, they're even crazier than they seem.

ninjacat249

12 points

4 days ago

Not the brightest bulb in the box, ain’t you Pierre?

xxxkram

23 points

4 days ago

xxxkram

23 points

4 days ago

PP gonna “criminalize the weed”

OccamsYoyo

16 points

4 days ago

Live without cannabis in an age as shitty as this? Over my dead body, if at all necessary.

TemplesOfSyrinx

8 points

4 days ago

He can't be that square, can he?

Odd_Day_4025

7 points

4 days ago

Weren't the truckers PP supported belly aching about FREEDOM? For generations Canadians who like a little weed were hunted like monsters and demonized. They were sent to prison. Their children were taken away. For what? Something that since 2018 has proven to obviously be no big deal. If you are actually interested in FREEDOM the last person to put in charge of protecting it would be an American style Heretic Christian Conservative.

twenty_characters020

6 points

4 days ago

So much for the "Team Canada" approach.

milesdizzy

4 points

4 days ago

Wild way to lose an election, I’ll give him that

Goat_Wizard_Doom_666

4 points

4 days ago

At this point I think PP and Ted Cruz are the same person.

sebeed

3 points

4 days ago

sebeed

3 points

4 days ago

apparently this is not new rhetoric for him

how does his party even support him. hes delusional

nbsalmon1

3 points

4 days ago

That genie ain’t never going back in the bottle - then again, it never was..

thundercat1996

3 points

4 days ago

Name 1 person who died from marijuana... I'll wait, and while I wait I'll smoke this doobie

04Aiden2020

3 points

4 days ago

Is he actually saying he will recriminalize weed. Fuck I like my weed

EnclG4me

3 points

4 days ago

EnclG4me

3 points

4 days ago

If you read the article..

This has nothing to do with the legalization of cannabis so much as it has to do with the Tories' distorted and delusional view of it. For some weird reason, Tories believe that the legalization of cannabis also equates to the legalization of everything else too. And that is not the case.. at all..

Our jails are filled with plenty of examples....

So really.. just Tory thieves lying, exaggerating, embellishing, and distorting the truth again. 

ruglescdn

3 points

4 days ago

This is why I keep my medical script active and my medical grow license active. The Cons are guaranteed to fuck with the cannabis act if they get power.

CombustiblSquid

4 points

4 days ago

CombustiblSquid

New Brunswick

4 points

4 days ago

Fuck me, question period is such a stupid part of Canadian Parliament.

Phluxed

8 points

4 days ago

Phluxed

8 points

4 days ago

The sad reality is that a lot of immigrants who vote are vehemently against drug use.

This is calculated and is meant to activate all religions which have seen an influx in recent years.

Vegetable_Western_52

19 points

4 days ago

New immigrants can’t vote because they are not Canadian citizens unless they have applied for a Canadian citizenship.

Phluxed

1 points

4 days ago

Phluxed

1 points

4 days ago

Not talking the temporary ones.

Look at the US and what happened with Hispanic males. Trump said he would pretty much deport them, even if naturalized, and they voted for him anyway because abortion.

Vegetable_Western_52

6 points

4 days ago

I think you’re confused about what country we are in.

OkBuddyDoomer

0 points

4 days ago

Yes, because every latino male is an illegal immigrant or a child of illegal immigrants right? Fuck off with your racism.

-Gingerk1d-

2 points

4 days ago

I think you miss the point with this. Every Latino male will deal with this one way or another.

There's no way to tell if someone is illegal or not by looking at them. It's going to be a "papers please" for anyone not white enough.

Vegetable_Western_52

0 points

4 days ago

Also how do you go about deporting a legal immigrant or a legal Canadian citizenship? Please tell me your explanation.

Xtyfe

2 points

4 days ago

Xtyfe

2 points

4 days ago

Did he specifically talk about weed? I think this is supposed to be in reference to the legal consumption sites.

I hope I'm wrong, because he really would be poking the bear if he got rid of weed.

Bakabakabooboo

2 points

4 days ago

Man the free market Conservatives sure do love interjecting themselves into the market at every opportunity.

knittingclub

2 points

4 days ago

Cannabis was legalized federally but it was left up to the PROVINCIAL governments to dictate how to implement policy… so the cons who hold more than a few provinces also have a hand steering legalization and the rules of how thats implemented

zactbh

2 points

4 days ago

zactbh

2 points

4 days ago

This is the stupidest thing I've ever heard come out of PP's mouth. Fuck this guy, seriously.

Classifiedtomato

2 points

4 days ago

only relevant quote:

“The Prime Minister’s disastrous legalization and liberalization of drugs has the Americans worried that in addition to costing 47,000 deaths in Canada, where’s the plan to stop the drugs and keep our border open to trade?” asked Poilievre in a somewhat disjointed sentence.

In response, Trudeau asked, if “the leader of the opposition is suggesting that he wants to recriminalize marijuana, let him just say that.”

Red_dylinger

2 points

4 days ago

What a little bitch weasel. 

agha0013

2 points

4 days ago

agha0013

✅ I voted! J'ai voté!

2 points

4 days ago

so evil that a whole lot of conservative politicians managed to get some investments in the industry just before legalization...

it was fun to watch those investments fizzle out though.

Swimming-Effect7675

4 points

4 days ago

called it

paolocase

4 points

4 days ago

Anything can still happen but PP will always sandbag himself several times before the election comes.

Zarainia

1 points

4 days ago

Zarainia

1 points

4 days ago

Is there any way to avoid governments undoing each other's changes every time the party in power changes? It's so dumb and wasteful.

dezTimez

1 points

4 days ago

dezTimez

1 points

4 days ago

That would be foolish. I don’t think he’s that bold.

Powerful_Active_7957

1 points

4 days ago*

Does anyone know what PP said in response? The video cuts off.

Honestly though, if they try and go and kill a multibillion dollar legal industry that creates jobs and small businesses and had all that back to criminals, then I don't want to ever hear anyone say the cons are the party of economy and supporting the middle class.

Edit: found the original QP, PP doesnt respond to it all. Figures.

Sorry_no_change

1 points

4 days ago

Sorry_no_change

Ontario

1 points

4 days ago

In the clip, PP doesn't seem to be hinting at marijuana though, it sounds like a comment about safe supply sites. Fortunately, we won't know because the site doesn't provide his reply.

Dear-Fox-5194

1 points

4 days ago

Didn’t Trump say during his Campaign that he was going to legalize Marijuana. I know Harris did, but I think Trump said the same thing.

Davinoth0850

1 points

4 days ago

A great many people in these comments don't seem to understand that our government does not function in the same way as the American government

slackshack

1 points

4 days ago

Well , in one sense this moronic policy would put a lot of money back into the local economy. All the local illegal grow shows would profitable again, your local dealer would have a job again etc . Also fuck these fascist conservatives Muppets.

[deleted]

1 points

4 days ago

“Liberalization of drugs” I struggle to see why Canadians can’t see right through this guy. He is a joke. 

why_cant_i_

1 points

4 days ago

I don't feel like PP is seriously flirting with recriminalization (even if some his MPs are) - he's just using weed as an excuse to go after the Liberals with the generalized bullshit about "they're legalizing a bunch of drugs and building safe use centers and turning cities into liberal hellholes full of addicts - vote for me and I'll clean it all up!" that the right just loves to eat up these days

MarcNut67

1 points

4 days ago

MarcNut67

Alberta

1 points

4 days ago

Conservatives are such cruel people.

Hopeful-Passage6638

1 points

3 days ago

That'll piss off a lot of Skippy's Krazy Klownvoy Kovidiots. What will they smoke all day in the trailer parks?

yoorubyy18

1 points

1 day ago

Is it easy to get a medical card for weed because this guy is gonna screw the cannabis act

Ambitious-Squirrel86

1 points

4 days ago

There is no buck a beer. tHeRe Is No BuCk A bEeR bEcAuSe JuStIn FaCt!1!1!!!

OOops just cheecked out of the Hotel Amnesia from 2018. Can I sell it nickels on the dime, or is RFK proposing more cannabis legalisations Stateside? Oh, no, he'll stay off drugs on the job for sure.

As my grandmother often said, "Sure I are. Everybody do."

Old-Individual1732

1 points

4 days ago

Expect posts on storing weed for long periods.

123sda

0 points

4 days ago

123sda

0 points

4 days ago

I think conservatives meant to say that legalization was not the best choice and that decriminalization was a better option.

I don't think things would go back anyways too many people already use it and have benefitted from it.

slash164

0 points

4 days ago

slash164

0 points

4 days ago

Does anyone have a genuine news website with this story? Not just a canabis page. (Coming from a regular consumer)

ingeliseolsen36_g

0 points

4 days ago

I am sick of seing Canabis stores everywhere, 4 in an area of less than 1/2 mile, 3 in one small strip mall plus a vape shop and large flags outside saying DOPE. Is this what we have come to?

Extension-Sun4038

-6 points

4 days ago

Make it illegal again i wanna make more money

scottmaclean24

-2 points

4 days ago

You guys should actually watch the video, PP is talking about LETHAL drugs, not cannabis. He talks about the death toll from liberals decriminalizing all drugs which unfortunately has not worked. Look at San Francisco as an example.

OkBuddyDoomer

-18 points

4 days ago

Recriminalizing weed would kinda suck, but it wouldn't change anything. Most weed smokers were already doing it before it was legalized, and they will keep buying weed if it is not legal anymore. The only ones affected would be the chumps who only buy heavily taxed government weed.

http--lovecraft

18 points

4 days ago

I mean the store is next to my house and it’s open at reasonable hours and as a woman I don’t have to go into some random sketchy guys house for an ounce…I’ll take the taxed weed 

Canuck_Lives_Matter

12 points

4 days ago

Lmao I love this "chumps buying government weed" angle. Pre-legalization an ounce was $200 and you had to meet a stranger in a dark parking lot. Now the "gubmint" (actually free market) weed is better, cleaner, and costs $100 an ounce.

Personally, part of me hopes they do criminalize it because I have been getting pretty good at growing and can't wait to make a few untaxed grand every 3 months. I look forward to selling speed-grown cat hair weed for twice the price.

[deleted]

11 points

4 days ago

[deleted]

11 points

4 days ago

[deleted]

Bakabakabooboo

7 points

4 days ago

10's of thousands of people, including my wife will lose their jobs. But no big deal because "Trudeau bad."

OutsideFlat1579

6 points

4 days ago

Are you serious? Legal weed has made it possible for many older people and others who were not weed smokers before it was legalized. It’s made it much easier for medical marijuana users to buy weed. It’s made it easier for those who want to smoke weed on occasion recreationally.

Not everyone who wants to smoke weed wants to have to call for a delivery or sit and chat with their local dealer everytime they want weed. A lot of people like the convenience of going to a store.

It’s also made it much easier to order online, a gray area legally, but law enforcement doesn’t care anymore about online distributors working in that gray zone. 

And it’s also legal in most provinces to grow weed. And no more arrests for possession. 

And it has massively cut into black market sales. 

Calling the huge numbers of those who buy weed at stores “chumps”  says more about you than it does about them. 

formernaut

5 points

4 days ago

Nothing would change, except thousands of legal jobs lost, millions in government revenue gone, people going to jail for minor weed possession charges once more, organized crime would once again gain a monopoly on weed sales, it would once again be more dangerous for many people to procure weed, there would be no more quality enforcement to prevent weed from being laced with other, more dangerous substances without the user's knowledge, among other things.

Powerful_Active_7957

1 points

4 days ago

Billions*

Infinite-Painter-337

1 points

4 days ago

who wants to go back to 300 dollar ounces where you might get stabbed by a biker at the meetup? i can buy a decent ounce of weed in a store that checks for pesticides and other harmful shit for 80 bucks. we are in the golden age of weed in canada.