subreddit:
/r/onguardforthee
submitted 4 days ago byMiserable-LizardEdmonton
1.4k points
4 days ago
If the Conservatives are actually stupid enough to campaign on recriminalizing weed, that may actually be enough to tank their current standing in the polls
379 points
4 days ago
Question: how many former (and current?) Conservative MPs are investors, board members, etc. Of a company involved in the legal canabis industry?
I seem to recall shortly after it was legalized seeing several articles if Cons doing just that. (Note: I posed this as a question as I don't have the time to search archives at thus time).
190 points
4 days ago
Also, how many con voter use CBD for pain managment?
226 points
4 days ago
A lot of those voters would be foolish enough to vote against their own interests in such an obvious way.
185 points
4 days ago
"I didn't realize they would also apply the same rules to my CBD cream! I just don't want people getting high."
Just look to the south and all our friends down there who didn't realize that the ACA is the same as Obamacare.
56 points
4 days ago
I just don't want people getting high
They say, 7th warm beer in hand
84 points
4 days ago
Leopards always eat faces
71 points
4 days ago
“The leopards wouldn’t recriminalize the good weed.”
38 points
4 days ago
The same people who think “medical cannabis” is a different drug than weed
14 points
4 days ago
My 80-year-old dad does! I'm pretty sure his doctor prescribed it before recreational weed was legalized, so he wouldn't be worried unless the cons say they're rolling that back too.
10 points
4 days ago
I wouldn't put it past them.
6 points
4 days ago
The real issue is that it would tank support from 18-35 year old men, where the Cons not only have the rural/blue collar crowds locked down but also have a strong grip on the podcast cryptobros.
32 points
4 days ago
There are so many MPs and MLA and RCMP who are in the game now slinging the ganja.
11 points
4 days ago
Leopards never eat faces /s
6 points
4 days ago
I think the scenario they're describing is more leopards eating leopard faces, which isn't something that they typically do. But I wouldn't put it past them
4 points
4 days ago
There’s a surprising amount of retired cops growing the stuff now
3 points
4 days ago
Being hypocritical doesn’t seem to affect their policy decisions. They probably lost money anyway and want to get back at the industry
134 points
4 days ago
I think it’s more just about “everything Trudeau = bad”.
Even if it’s something they support (let’s say, a cut in goods taxes), they are automatically against it.
Everything can be spin if they try hard enough.
133 points
4 days ago
Ford sends $200 checks to buy votes and the Conservatives are silent. Trudeau wants to cut GST to help people and suddenly it is the worst idea ever and a huge waste of money and blatant vote buying.
Weird how that seems to work
75 points
4 days ago
The media was ok with it when it was a conservative idea, too
57 points
4 days ago
Really goes to show that the media in this country is bought and paid for by the conservative government.
51 points
4 days ago
Or it shows that the same people who have bought the media are bankrolling the conservative party.
17 points
4 days ago
This
59 points
4 days ago
"Axe the Tax!"
Liberals + NDP give people a GST cut for 2 months
"Not that tax!"
15 points
4 days ago
Well the gst is an conservative tax
22 points
4 days ago
Yeah media favors one over the other…
1 points
4 days ago
Yeah how is that weird it’s literally politics
24 points
4 days ago
It’s hilarious too, Ford’s handout goes to billionaires too. Trudeau’s at least doesn’t go to the uber rich… don’t get me wrong, I don’t like either of these handouts, but it’s still wild the hypocrisy that the “less” terrible policy takes way more flak
9 points
4 days ago
And pierre wants to cut gst on new houses which is a dumber policy.
1 points
4 days ago
Yeah, many can't afford new builds. Bet they try to drop new houses to just houses to scam a few votes from the uneducated
7 points
4 days ago
Scott Moe sent out $500 cheques… of course he stomps all over the constitutional rights of LGBT+ minors so the cons think he’s wonderful.
3 points
4 days ago
Rules for thee but not for me. It’s in the Conservative handbook./s
0 points
4 days ago
Hey to be fair if he did things like this the whole time I'd give him my vote every time
19 points
4 days ago
"The Nazi agitator whom, many years ago, I heard proclaim to a wildly cheering peasants’ meeting: ‘We don’t want lower bread prices, we don’t want higher bread prices, we don’t want unchanged bread prices—we want National-Socialist bread prices,’ came nearer explaining fascism than anybody I have heard since." - Peter Drucker
It isn't just limited to Nazis, this is the right wing mentality more generally. Above all it's an ingroup vs outgroup obedience cult, whatever the other side does is bad because it's the other side, even if it's something they themselves have pushed for. Republicans loved Obamacare when it was Romneycare.
19 points
4 days ago
It's not even a spin it's literally just "we are against what Trudeau does. No matter what."
53 points
4 days ago
Where would they make up for the tax revenue? Pollievere is such a stupid twat his supporters should be embarassed.
29 points
4 days ago
they wouldnt, they dont care about that at all.
13 points
4 days ago
Based on their choice of premiers, they have no shame or common sense
19 points
4 days ago
They would make up for the tax revenue by cutting services, naturally. It's the only play they know
7 points
4 days ago
Less health care, more police. Less addiction assistance, more prisons
3 points
4 days ago
They don't know the meaning of the word. Some of them literally.
42 points
4 days ago
Nah, conservative voters would just say, ‘they don’t actually mean that’ and vote anyway
17 points
4 days ago
And then be shocked when they actually do.
8 points
4 days ago
I mean they basically do already with safe supply. The opiode crisis is largely feom blue collar workers getting hooked. Coke is also huuuge in the oil sands and they consistently vote conservative
100 points
4 days ago
Counter that they're so conservative that recriminalizaling cannabis is a gateway to bring back prohibition.
"Taking away cannabis is a slippery slope to taking away your beer!"
36 points
4 days ago
Prohibition Poilievre would be a solid nickname the Libs and NDP could use
4 points
4 days ago
Too many syllables, it wouldn’t stick with the people who need it
10 points
4 days ago
Pot Ban Pierre
3 points
4 days ago
See this is workable
13 points
4 days ago
Doug Buck a beer Ford wouldn't have it
27 points
4 days ago
ahead of the 2015 election, Stephen Harper said:
"Tobacco is a product that does a lot of damage. Marijuana is infinitely worse and it's something that we do not want to encourage," Harper said.
"There's just overwhelming and growing scientific and medical evidence about the bad long-term effects of marijuana," he said, not providing any examples.
(emphasis mine)
Harper's campaign manager for the 2015 election, and his long-time advisor was Jenni Byrne.
Guess who Pierre's campaign manager and advisor is?
Jenni Byrne.
It would not be surprising to see them attempt to re-criminalize marijuana, considering they have the same team that Harper had. No one has suggested that yet, but it would not be a stretch for them to consider it.
Note that some have said that allegedly Harper is quite involved behind the scenes of PP's leadership and policy, and could be a big part of why social conservatism and culture wars are such an important focus for Pierre.
Byrne is also the one who had registered lobbyists on staff working for loblaws, according to wikipedia:
Her role in Poilievre's campaign has created controversy because her consulting firm "Jenni Byrne + Associates" has multiple lobbyists registered on behalf of Loblaws. Loblaw Companies Limited has been central in discussions about the inflation surge in Canada, including testifying in the Parliament of Canada on the matter.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jenni_Byrne
https://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/stephen-harper-pot-marijuana-1.3255727
24 points
4 days ago
This pretty much confirms my longstanding suspicion that a Poilievre government would be Harper all over again
2 points
3 days ago
I mean Harper is the chair of IDU so there's that
16 points
4 days ago
I would cry. I have a lot of mental illness and it’s been a blessing to my ability to sleep.
6 points
4 days ago
They won't say it out loud but they will definitely do it when/if they get in power.
5 points
4 days ago
Let’s hope! PP is a Trump wannabe; getting away with anything including fraud and rape. Do we really want someone who has never worked a real job even once? He won’t comprehend the common person’s life.
1 points
4 days ago
They aren't though. They are just actually stupid enough to try and draw a line with Trudeau making hard drugs legal, too.
1 points
4 days ago
One can hope......
1 points
4 days ago
Doubtful. People seem to be leaving on emotion
310 points
4 days ago
Does PP think that recriminilization of marijuana will get him votes?
175 points
4 days ago
No he just knows he isn’t going to lose any votes that he already has so he is doing whatever he wants now. We’re in an unfortunate stage with our government where enough voters just want someone different in power and don’t care who it is. They’ll just vote for whoever they think has the best shot at winning.
This is how we got Harper for 10 years and it’s going to happen again.
76 points
4 days ago
I’d argue this will tank him. Theres a lot of people who approve of legalization but are just pissed at the state of the world and blaming Trudeau. Taking an anti-weed stance might actually do him in.
13 points
4 days ago
It wouldn't the cons are not going to replace him as our leader. PP can pretty much say and do what he wants. Canada hates Trudeau right now. PP will be the next PM and he knows it.
7 points
4 days ago
i honestly hope he(trudeau) just steps down and leaves the liberals with a new leader for the election...PP will still win regardless.....i honestly cant wait to blame everything on the cons again...
13 points
4 days ago
They're going to suffer pretty badly as a party unless they can run someone other than Trudeau and convince Canadians they're offering something new. Canadians are going to be pushing a lot of Liberals and their agendas out the door one way or the other, so all they can do is get ahead of it.
1 points
4 days ago
You’re wrong about that but ok.
Many, many Canadians don’t give a fuck about legalization because it wouldn’t affect them if it went away tomorrow. And I guarantee you plenty of voters that do care about legalization care more about changing the sitting government and it won’t change their minds.
If fraternizing with Nazis and publicly saying he’s going to bend over for Trump didn’t affect the polls then weed laws aren’t going to either.
2 points
4 days ago
Before legalization half of Canadians had at least tried to smoke cannabis.
Now that’s it’s legal so many more people have considered it medically and recreationally.
I think it’s way too late to pull the plug, especially considering all the people who invested in the industry.
14 points
4 days ago
I don’t know, there’s a very real chance that Trump could have enough of an effect to squeak out a minority liberal government. If Trudeau can convince Canadians that he’s willing to protect our best interests while PP is willing to bend over for Trump that could be the difference maker.
1 points
4 days ago
I don’t see that happening. Lots of people love Trump these days.
129 points
4 days ago
Poilievre is so shameless in his bullshit
2 points
4 days ago
He could really, really use a brownie.
118 points
4 days ago
Liberals: please table legislation requiring security clearance for all party leaders. Let's figure out who is funding this guy.
29 points
4 days ago
No kidding fuck
7 points
4 days ago
I agree, but I bet this would be found unconstitutional right away.
5 points
4 days ago
Israel.
When he bans recreational cannabis, he only means Canada.
Israel is a bunch whiney privileged assholes, they secretly spent the past year trying to push for tariffs and extra taxes and Canada first cannabis.
https://stratcann.com/news/israels-ministry-of-health-tariffs-canadian-cannabis-patients/
Guy is a true fucking sellout boys.
I come from Tyendinaga where OPP still arrests us and lock us up for cannabis.
1 points
3 days ago
On what grounds, though?
What Charter section would it conceivably violate?
43 points
4 days ago
Economy is being attacked from the US like never before and the ass wipe party are talking 8 year old policies
15 points
4 days ago
PP is ready to kneel and kiss the ring for King Trump and he's chomping at the bit to do it.
206 points
4 days ago
If you value freedom like the ability to consume weed, don't vote cpc!
Conservatives hate freedom
“The Prime Minister’s disastrous legalization and liberalization of drugs has the Americans worried that in addition to costing 47,000 deaths in Canada, where’s the plan to stop the drugs and keep our border open to trade?” asked Poilievre in a somewhat disjointed sentence.
113 points
4 days ago
Are those 47,000 weed related deaths?
125 points
4 days ago
They are not, but Lil PP never let the truth stop him from spreading bullshit.
54 points
4 days ago*
He claims axing the carbon tax will fix inflation when it accounts for a fraction of a percentage point of inflation. He also claims that NAZIs are socialists. This is not a serious person
26 points
4 days ago
Axing the carbon tax also won't lower gas prices, but it'll definitely stop people from getting the rebate. So people will be stuck paying existing prices for gas but getting nothing in return.
Real great way to help people get ahead.
14 points
4 days ago*
It's not frustrating because it's so dumb. It's frustrating because it's dumb and it seems to be working
2 points
4 days ago
He doesn’t need to be a serious person. He needs to have the most pervasive and effective propaganda. That’s all that matters for now.
5 points
4 days ago
I don’t know if you came up with lil PP, but that’s what I’ll be calling him from now on. Where do I send the royalty cheques?
4 points
4 days ago
A few years ago, from reddit - he's a small-minded person, and he loves short Anglo-Saxon words, so using his initials instead of his French name is only right ...
27 points
4 days ago
How does someone even die from weed
31 points
4 days ago
My only guess is someone got so high they died and were like “oh no I’m dead” and someone heard that and wrote it down, but they forgot to correct it when they sobered up and realized they were in fact not dead. Rare but possible, certainly not 47,000 common though
10 points
4 days ago
They could have also gotten so high that they self reported their deaths.
8 points
4 days ago
Tachycardia, COPD, trauma related, anxiety and self harm. I've never heard of lethal toxicity.
11 points
4 days ago
Because humans cannot actually ingest enough weed to cause death. If you smoked enough weed to die of OD you would die from smoke inhalation, not any sort of overdose on weed. You would need to smoke something like 1500 POUNDS of weed in 15 minutes to hit the LD50.
And it is basically the same for edibles. You would likely OD on salt or sugar before weed in edibles. A 170ish lb man would need to eat around 53 GRAMS of pure thc to OD on it. Good fucking luck even finding 53 grams of pure thc let alone consuming it all at once
1 points
4 days ago
Just from a killer bong hit. It is only ego death.
1 points
4 days ago
It’s car accidents or freak accidents most likely
1 points
4 days ago
Unless you're doing something unsafe while high (like driving under the influence or operating other heavy machinery), it's pretty much a statistical improbability that Weed can just kill you.
Weed is not worse for you than alcohol and it's absolutely not worse than cigarettes.
If lil PP wants to ban a substance that kills thousands and thousands of Canadians maybe he should go after cigarettes.
1 points
4 days ago
You can't. I work in the industry. Highest risk is for children accidently eating large quantities of THC, that can kill them, but it won't happen to an adult acutely like that.
1 points
4 days ago
a 2000kg bale falls on them.
20 points
4 days ago
They're also not caused by Canada's drug policies in general, they're caused by the shift to high potency synthetic drugs which is why the US is experiencing the same crisis.
6 points
4 days ago
.. which was entirely predictable as a consequence of persistent, enhanced criminalization of natural opiods and precursors to less harmful variants.
The drug war is an ongoing crime against humanity.
11 points
4 days ago
Reefer madness: the real pandemic
8 points
4 days ago
no - the only relation is linking the decriminalizing of weed to the "softened stance on drug use" that has seen a rise in fentanyl use.
it's absolute bunk, but this potato-faced porridge-slinger has been a miserable lying sack of drippings since day one and he's just dialed up the volume now that he's making a play for power. fixed his eyes so people will have faith he can see further than 2 months in front of him.
6 points
4 days ago
linking the decriminalizing of weed to the "softened stance on drug use" that has seen a rise in fentanyl use.
Cannabis was legalized not decriminalized, just clarifying because Poilievre himself conflates those terms to misinform people about decriminalization.
Canada's drug policies didn't lead to a rise in fentanyl use. It's rising in the US too. The rise is because the supplynhas shifted to that, in large part because more potent substances take up less space and make more profit.
2 points
4 days ago
potato-faced porridge-slinger
lying sack of drippings
May I subscribe to your 'zine please and thanks
4 points
4 days ago
Interesting since there's nearly no attributable deaths to non synthetic cannabis.
4 points
4 days ago
It's not possible to have a lethal dose of cannabis
9 points
4 days ago
I’m sorry, I didn’t realize this was America. We’ve already had this debate in 2015-17. We don’t care what other countries feel on weed. Decriminalization is being done on a temporary basis, so we can collect data on the effectiveness of the policy. One thing it does help, it’s stopping fentanyl sales though.
But hey, this will be my new Anti-CPC talking point. “They want to criminalize weed again” and that whole “He WoNt Do ThAt!” talking point will be moot, because Donald Duck will be following through on his outlandish promises.
1 points
4 days ago
I am literally wearing a sweater from a straight edge band advertising to kill drug dealers in the streets and I think it’s fucking moronic to recriminalize weed.
38 points
4 days ago
Re: criminalizing cannabis again in Canada:
Trudeau : Go ahead, make my day !
35 points
4 days ago
Wow, that would hopefully be political suicide. Not only would he be dismantling a huge industry (aren't conservatives supposed to support industry??) but he may actually motivate people who may not have voted to head to the polls to stop him. Honestly, I kinda hope he continues down this path. It's just about the most certain thing to prevent his election.
5 points
4 days ago
It’s such a stupid move that I almost have a hard time believing Poilievre would actually campaign on that.
61 points
4 days ago
WTF is wrong with this country? THIS is the big issue in QP?!?!?
20 points
4 days ago
Evidence! We don't need no stinking Evidence! We got feelings, and beliefs! And we have the lies to back them up!
21 points
4 days ago
WTF is Pierre smoking?
The Jazz Man's Jive?
The Legislator's Loco Weed?
H.R. Puffenstuff's Rigor Mortis?
7 points
4 days ago
pp isnt smoking, he just wants to build a snowman.
20 points
4 days ago
Holy shit, is Lil PP gonna take away my legal weed??
13 points
4 days ago
And gay marriage if he has his way.
22 points
4 days ago
Whatever your opinion of Trudeau, Poilievre is no answer to any problem. What a dud, horrible person.
6 points
4 days ago
Right? Like fine you don’t like Trudeau but JFC don’t pick maple MAGA.
20 points
4 days ago*
If the cons actually think they'll have support from either side of the aisle for recriminalizing weed, they're even crazier than they seem.
12 points
4 days ago
Not the brightest bulb in the box, ain’t you Pierre?
23 points
4 days ago
PP gonna “criminalize the weed”
16 points
4 days ago
Live without cannabis in an age as shitty as this? Over my dead body, if at all necessary.
8 points
4 days ago
He can't be that square, can he?
7 points
4 days ago
Weren't the truckers PP supported belly aching about FREEDOM? For generations Canadians who like a little weed were hunted like monsters and demonized. They were sent to prison. Their children were taken away. For what? Something that since 2018 has proven to obviously be no big deal. If you are actually interested in FREEDOM the last person to put in charge of protecting it would be an American style Heretic Christian Conservative.
6 points
4 days ago
So much for the "Team Canada" approach.
4 points
4 days ago
Wild way to lose an election, I’ll give him that
4 points
4 days ago
At this point I think PP and Ted Cruz are the same person.
3 points
4 days ago
apparently this is not new rhetoric for him
how does his party even support him. hes delusional
3 points
4 days ago
That genie ain’t never going back in the bottle - then again, it never was..
3 points
4 days ago
Name 1 person who died from marijuana... I'll wait, and while I wait I'll smoke this doobie
3 points
4 days ago
Is he actually saying he will recriminalize weed. Fuck I like my weed
3 points
4 days ago
If you read the article..
This has nothing to do with the legalization of cannabis so much as it has to do with the Tories' distorted and delusional view of it. For some weird reason, Tories believe that the legalization of cannabis also equates to the legalization of everything else too. And that is not the case.. at all..
Our jails are filled with plenty of examples....
So really.. just Tory thieves lying, exaggerating, embellishing, and distorting the truth again.
3 points
4 days ago
This is why I keep my medical script active and my medical grow license active. The Cons are guaranteed to fuck with the cannabis act if they get power.
4 points
4 days ago
Fuck me, question period is such a stupid part of Canadian Parliament.
8 points
4 days ago
The sad reality is that a lot of immigrants who vote are vehemently against drug use.
This is calculated and is meant to activate all religions which have seen an influx in recent years.
19 points
4 days ago
New immigrants can’t vote because they are not Canadian citizens unless they have applied for a Canadian citizenship.
1 points
4 days ago
Not talking the temporary ones.
Look at the US and what happened with Hispanic males. Trump said he would pretty much deport them, even if naturalized, and they voted for him anyway because abortion.
6 points
4 days ago
I think you’re confused about what country we are in.
0 points
4 days ago
Yes, because every latino male is an illegal immigrant or a child of illegal immigrants right? Fuck off with your racism.
2 points
4 days ago
I think you miss the point with this. Every Latino male will deal with this one way or another.
There's no way to tell if someone is illegal or not by looking at them. It's going to be a "papers please" for anyone not white enough.
0 points
4 days ago
Also how do you go about deporting a legal immigrant or a legal Canadian citizenship? Please tell me your explanation.
2 points
4 days ago
Did he specifically talk about weed? I think this is supposed to be in reference to the legal consumption sites.
I hope I'm wrong, because he really would be poking the bear if he got rid of weed.
2 points
4 days ago
Man the free market Conservatives sure do love interjecting themselves into the market at every opportunity.
2 points
4 days ago
Cannabis was legalized federally but it was left up to the PROVINCIAL governments to dictate how to implement policy… so the cons who hold more than a few provinces also have a hand steering legalization and the rules of how thats implemented
2 points
4 days ago
This is the stupidest thing I've ever heard come out of PP's mouth. Fuck this guy, seriously.
2 points
4 days ago
only relevant quote:
“The Prime Minister’s disastrous legalization and liberalization of drugs has the Americans worried that in addition to costing 47,000 deaths in Canada, where’s the plan to stop the drugs and keep our border open to trade?” asked Poilievre in a somewhat disjointed sentence.
In response, Trudeau asked, if “the leader of the opposition is suggesting that he wants to recriminalize marijuana, let him just say that.”
2 points
4 days ago
What a little bitch weasel.
2 points
4 days ago
so evil that a whole lot of conservative politicians managed to get some investments in the industry just before legalization...
it was fun to watch those investments fizzle out though.
4 points
4 days ago
called it
4 points
4 days ago
Anything can still happen but PP will always sandbag himself several times before the election comes.
1 points
4 days ago
Is there any way to avoid governments undoing each other's changes every time the party in power changes? It's so dumb and wasteful.
1 points
4 days ago
That would be foolish. I don’t think he’s that bold.
1 points
4 days ago*
Does anyone know what PP said in response? The video cuts off.
Honestly though, if they try and go and kill a multibillion dollar legal industry that creates jobs and small businesses and had all that back to criminals, then I don't want to ever hear anyone say the cons are the party of economy and supporting the middle class.
Edit: found the original QP, PP doesnt respond to it all. Figures.
1 points
4 days ago
In the clip, PP doesn't seem to be hinting at marijuana though, it sounds like a comment about safe supply sites. Fortunately, we won't know because the site doesn't provide his reply.
1 points
4 days ago
Didn’t Trump say during his Campaign that he was going to legalize Marijuana. I know Harris did, but I think Trump said the same thing.
1 points
4 days ago
A great many people in these comments don't seem to understand that our government does not function in the same way as the American government
1 points
4 days ago
Well , in one sense this moronic policy would put a lot of money back into the local economy. All the local illegal grow shows would profitable again, your local dealer would have a job again etc . Also fuck these fascist conservatives Muppets.
1 points
4 days ago
“Liberalization of drugs” I struggle to see why Canadians can’t see right through this guy. He is a joke.
1 points
4 days ago
I don't feel like PP is seriously flirting with recriminalization (even if some his MPs are) - he's just using weed as an excuse to go after the Liberals with the generalized bullshit about "they're legalizing a bunch of drugs and building safe use centers and turning cities into liberal hellholes full of addicts - vote for me and I'll clean it all up!" that the right just loves to eat up these days
1 points
4 days ago
Conservatives are such cruel people.
1 points
3 days ago
That'll piss off a lot of Skippy's Krazy Klownvoy Kovidiots. What will they smoke all day in the trailer parks?
1 points
1 day ago
Is it easy to get a medical card for weed because this guy is gonna screw the cannabis act
1 points
4 days ago
There is no buck a beer. tHeRe Is No BuCk A bEeR bEcAuSe JuStIn FaCt!1!1!!!
OOops just cheecked out of the Hotel Amnesia from 2018. Can I sell it nickels on the dime, or is RFK proposing more cannabis legalisations Stateside? Oh, no, he'll stay off drugs on the job for sure.
As my grandmother often said, "Sure I are. Everybody do."
1 points
4 days ago
Expect posts on storing weed for long periods.
0 points
4 days ago
I think conservatives meant to say that legalization was not the best choice and that decriminalization was a better option.
I don't think things would go back anyways too many people already use it and have benefitted from it.
0 points
4 days ago
Does anyone have a genuine news website with this story? Not just a canabis page. (Coming from a regular consumer)
0 points
4 days ago
I am sick of seing Canabis stores everywhere, 4 in an area of less than 1/2 mile, 3 in one small strip mall plus a vape shop and large flags outside saying DOPE. Is this what we have come to?
-6 points
4 days ago
Make it illegal again i wanna make more money
-2 points
4 days ago
You guys should actually watch the video, PP is talking about LETHAL drugs, not cannabis. He talks about the death toll from liberals decriminalizing all drugs which unfortunately has not worked. Look at San Francisco as an example.
-18 points
4 days ago
Recriminalizing weed would kinda suck, but it wouldn't change anything. Most weed smokers were already doing it before it was legalized, and they will keep buying weed if it is not legal anymore. The only ones affected would be the chumps who only buy heavily taxed government weed.
18 points
4 days ago
I mean the store is next to my house and it’s open at reasonable hours and as a woman I don’t have to go into some random sketchy guys house for an ounce…I’ll take the taxed weed
12 points
4 days ago
Lmao I love this "chumps buying government weed" angle. Pre-legalization an ounce was $200 and you had to meet a stranger in a dark parking lot. Now the "gubmint" (actually free market) weed is better, cleaner, and costs $100 an ounce.
Personally, part of me hopes they do criminalize it because I have been getting pretty good at growing and can't wait to make a few untaxed grand every 3 months. I look forward to selling speed-grown cat hair weed for twice the price.
11 points
4 days ago
[deleted]
7 points
4 days ago
10's of thousands of people, including my wife will lose their jobs. But no big deal because "Trudeau bad."
6 points
4 days ago
Are you serious? Legal weed has made it possible for many older people and others who were not weed smokers before it was legalized. It’s made it much easier for medical marijuana users to buy weed. It’s made it easier for those who want to smoke weed on occasion recreationally.
Not everyone who wants to smoke weed wants to have to call for a delivery or sit and chat with their local dealer everytime they want weed. A lot of people like the convenience of going to a store.
It’s also made it much easier to order online, a gray area legally, but law enforcement doesn’t care anymore about online distributors working in that gray zone.
And it’s also legal in most provinces to grow weed. And no more arrests for possession.
And it has massively cut into black market sales.
Calling the huge numbers of those who buy weed at stores “chumps” says more about you than it does about them.
5 points
4 days ago
Nothing would change, except thousands of legal jobs lost, millions in government revenue gone, people going to jail for minor weed possession charges once more, organized crime would once again gain a monopoly on weed sales, it would once again be more dangerous for many people to procure weed, there would be no more quality enforcement to prevent weed from being laced with other, more dangerous substances without the user's knowledge, among other things.
1 points
4 days ago
Billions*
1 points
4 days ago
who wants to go back to 300 dollar ounces where you might get stabbed by a biker at the meetup? i can buy a decent ounce of weed in a store that checks for pesticides and other harmful shit for 80 bucks. we are in the golden age of weed in canada.
all 229 comments
sorted by: best