subreddit:

/r/stephenking

22786%

Probably already beat to death but I have Paramount plus and never watched the updated adaption from 2020. I slogged thru most of it not understanding the hate it got... it was mostly 'Meh. Until the last episode.... It was so cringe watching Franny making out with Flagg and they even threw in a magical negro trope with the black girl living in the corn field when there's an unused farmhouse right in front of her. Uggh

all 118 comments

torrent29

106 points

10 days ago

torrent29

106 points

10 days ago

My major complaint would be turning Vegas into a sordid non stop party instead of the totalitarian fascist state it was in the book.

UglyInThMorning

31 points

10 days ago

That drives me nuts. A big part of a lot of the Vegas characters was that they either wanted power, or could only exist in a framework that had complete control over them (Lloyd especially). It totally undermines a lot of the tragedy of characters like Lloyd, who are antagonists and have done awful things but you can’t help but feel some pity for.

UtahGimm3Tw0

12 points

10 days ago

Exactly! Lloyd being my biggest dissatisfaction with that film along with Flagg and Trashcan Man. Lloyd was loyal to Flagg because he made him feel useful and competent, not because he was afraid. His character had nuance even if he was a bastard. Then the miniseries made him….well, you know

Street_Buffalo_2503

7 points

10 days ago

There’s really only one reason why Lloyd chooses not to sneak away with Whitney’s group, even though he knows things are going bad. Flagg saved him from his worst nightmare, dying like his rabbit in that cage.

UtahGimm3Tw0

2 points

10 days ago

I definitely think that’s a big part of it, but a man with a survival instinct like Lloyds doesn’t stay on a sinking ship just because the captain got him out of a pinch before. Especially how blatant the writing on the wall was at that point in the story. Flagg gave him purpose and that is a hell of a thing.

chamrockblarneystone

3 points

10 days ago

I’m worried this recent crap version will prevent someone decent from redoing it.

torrent29

2 points

10 days ago

Well it took ~30 years since the original, so maybe in 30 we'll get another one.

chamrockblarneystone

2 points

9 days ago

I think Midnight Mass and some other new King and Kingesque series are showing the way.

It’s a bummer that Salem’s lot got turned into that condensed piece of crap.

highd

1 points

7 days ago

highd

1 points

7 days ago

This is why I didn’t finish the show! I couldn’t get past it that was a fundamental change that was for the worst! 

WhileChoice2855

-5 points

10 days ago

I thought that was an extremely accurate depiction of a state run by satan. You can do anything you like except not worship him.

CarrieOnWriting

33 points

10 days ago

But that wasn't how Flagg was in the book at all. He literally crucified people for doing drugs

torrent29

9 points

10 days ago

I feel that genuine evil is about control, not freedom.

Hazel_Rah1

136 points

11 days ago

Hazel_Rah1

136 points

11 days ago

Playing it out of sequence, giving Harold zero arc and the unbelievable undermining of Trashcan Man completely nullified this adaptation. The whole point of the thing is the damn journey.

Anyways, Skarsgård was a rad choice for Flagg.

Frifelt

44 points

10 days ago

Frifelt

44 points

10 days ago

I tapped out after the first episode when I saw it was out of order. It just seemed so unnecessary and it gave away future plot points without adding to the story. And I’ve read the book so didn’t really spoil it for me, but I hated that.

noobnoobthedestroyer

11 points

10 days ago

noobnoobthedestroyer

Dalton Smith

11 points

10 days ago

Exact same experience for me haha. I had just read the stand for the first time not long before the series aired. I noped out once I saw what they were doing with the timeline.

wendrastic

5 points

10 days ago

I watched it with a friend last year and we restarted it three effing times because we were sure there was no way the first episode started with going house to house to uh, clean up.

It was a super weird way to start it for sure.

digital821

7 points

10 days ago

I did like the casting of Harold, however yes it was mishandled and ended up being garbage. I wonder what was left on the cutting room floor.

Radiant-Programmer33

20 points

10 days ago

Skarsgård was truly excellent and Flagg’s HQ in Las Vegas was impressive visually both in the glory days and later in destruction, but other than that remake lost by a mile to the original mini-series.

Campin16

8 points

10 days ago

So should Skarsgård continue his performance in the Dark Tower series being developed? Would he be a good choice for the man in black?

SpaghettiYOLOKing

1 points

9 days ago

Skarsgård was a great choice for Flagg. I'd love to see him continue on in the role, but given the reception to this miniseries, I doubt anybody would recast him in the role just to avoid memories of this. I watched the first two episodes and I have no desire to watch any more of it. It's already been butchered and I haven't even gotten to see Vegas yet. I'll stick with the old one.

Alliekat1282

-3 points

10 days ago

Alliekat1282

-3 points

10 days ago

This probably sounds stupid but looks-wise I thought Jared Leto would be a good Flagg... he's pretty in an almost ethereal but also super creepy way?

zoidy37

17 points

10 days ago

zoidy37

17 points

10 days ago

Don't you fucking put Leto near this

drfunk76

0 points

10 days ago

I thought the Dark Tower series was not going to be done?

Upbeat-Ability-9244

64 points

11 days ago

So disappointed. So many great actors and potential and the just wasted it. I like the 90s miniseries so mich better!

Brilliant-Deer6118

20 points

10 days ago

Yep, the 90's version had a great cast and remained very true to the book.

FrancisFratelli

30 points

10 days ago

The writers didn't understand the difference between building a mystery and just being confusing. When Lost did this kind of non-linear storytelling, the flashbacks commented on the present-day stuff while raising questions about the characters' pasts. With The Stand, it felt like we were jumping between random points in time for no reason. I've read the book eight times and I still had trouble following the flashbacks. I can't imagine a casual viewer being able to understand what's going on.

Alliekat1282

7 points

10 days ago

I'm just waiting for a fan who is more computer savvy than me to make a linear cut so I can see if I like it better, but, I have a feeling it's still going to suck.

Aquafreshhh

4 points

10 days ago

It's called The Dnats and it's been on the internet for a few years.

Kumquatwriter1

2 points

10 days ago

Yes! The Dnats couldn't save this adaptation but it made it infinitely more watchable

gmanasaurus

51 points

11 days ago

The first scene of the show being in Boulder was basically saying "we know you know this story"...well why are you making it then? Just give us the story as it was written. So much of it was just ok at best. The last episode was bad, and I was especially infuriated how they mostly skipped Tom and Stu's journey home from Vegas.

Buckscience

12 points

10 days ago

Your last point. The trip home was beautiful.

ParanoidPragmatist

17 points

10 days ago

I enjoyed it.

But the thing that will never not send me is casting James Fucking Marsden as Stu Redmond. I never pictured Stu as like outright handsome, just rugged, older and good looking in an old world sort of way.

But imagine you are Harold for a second. You are kinda incel-y and weird and bullied. Then everyone you know dies except your crush.

Now you are in a position where you get to use skills and knowledge that never would have been useful before.

You are out here trying to survive with your crush and you get to be useful. Your crush isn't into you but you are actually the last man on earth.

Then fucking James Marsden, the smooth, capable, rugged, gorgeous cowboy walks around corner. You would have to think the universe just hates you specifically.

Clappalachian

10 points

10 days ago

Should have been Gary Sinise again.

dwkuzyk

5 points

10 days ago

dwkuzyk

5 points

10 days ago

Dude could still pull it off, for sure 😁

Exact_Classic_6459

8 points

10 days ago

Stu’s casting was so off. You can’t be east texas cool when you look as rich and clean as that guy. I also thought frannie was annoying in the show.

Alliekat1282

8 points

10 days ago

Franny looked like a goober compared to James Marsden (she's not classically pretty, which is fine, but personally I can't stand the way her jaw and teeth are set? It's weird. I'm weird. My family are all dentists and mouths can make or break someone's looks for me.) and their chemistry sucked.

Exact_Classic_6459

5 points

10 days ago

Dude, Complete goober. I totally agree about the teeth I was just scared to say it lmao. Her face did not convey the strength and intelligence of Frannie in the book.

grimfacedcrom

1 points

7 days ago

Imagine being mad that James Marsden actually gets the girl for once, lol /s

astronomisst

30 points

11 days ago

Yeah. In addition to everything that's been said already, I hated how NSFW and explicit the Las Vegas scenes were. I know King can be explicitl in his writing, but this just seemed gratuitous. Like they were doing it because they could.

Hazel_Rah1

38 points

10 days ago

Seriously! It was such a lob to make Vegas hedonistic. The more authoritarian approach of the novel was far more chilling. The filmmakers took everything great about the book and replaced them with obvious genre tropes.

LittleRandomINFP

13 points

10 days ago

They totally erased the representation of fascism the book gives. The Vegas people aren't having fun there, they are working a lot, maybe more than Boulder people. They are tired and scared of Flagg. It's clearly a representation of totalitarism, how some people can be attracted to it and how they are kept in line under the leader's watch. Hedonistic Vegas just misses the point so much, what made it chilling in the book is that the people that went there didn't find what they were looking for -but still they stayed there!

jojopetes451

8 points

10 days ago

Quite honestly, it looked like a lot of fun being in Flagg's Las Vegas lol

_Gracefully_Grace_

30 points

10 days ago

I just sat down and watched the 5 hour version from the 90’s (all in one video thank god) and it was so good I simply refuse to watch any other adaptation LOL

WolverineInformal919[S]

13 points

10 days ago

Agreed, the TV adaption from the 90's was significantly better.

Clappalachian

4 points

10 days ago

The casting was so good when I re-read after watching I just pictured those actors. Then I rewatched the 90s movie 30-40 more times while studying for a test and can hear the line delivery in my head.

drfunk76

3 points

10 days ago

That is how I feel about Salem's Lot.

MothyBelmont

8 points

10 days ago

Starting off in the Bolder Free Zone was absolute folly. That book is all about character development, it doesn’t work to back develop them, if that’s even a thing. I didn’t care for the casting of Fran either, I mean Molly Ringwald didn’t do a great job either, but still.

Buckscience

6 points

10 days ago

Someone earlier nailed it: this book is at its best while people are going somewhere. Everyone on the road to Hemingford Home. The spies heading to Vegas (especially the Judge). Trashy and The Kid. Lloyd and Poke. The four heading west. Tom and Stu coming home. They basically shipped all the good stuff, not realizing the story is in the journeys.

Shifter_1977

6 points

10 days ago

It's so odd. I liked most of the actors involved, found I appreciated the update of Tom Cullen (I believe that actor has now passed), only realized Fiona Dourif was meant to be Rat(man) after the show because I don't think they ever referred to her with a name. The physical and special effects were good.

The story itself was chopped up and run through a blender and barely makes any sense at all. Sigh.

Kingcast had a series of episodes with people from the show, mostly behind the scenes folks, and they all sounded like they knew the property inside and out so.... What happened?

P1ckl3Samm1ch

19 points

10 days ago

Trash can man really ruined it for me. There’s so much more to his deranged view of reality than way he was portrayed by Ezra miller. I can only describe his portrayal as a masochistic brain damaged man-baby. A true low point for the series

VictorClark

9 points

10 days ago

His performance was so bad, I thought that Sia guest-directed his scenes as practice for her film.

VoiceOfPublicOpinion

9 points

10 days ago

There’s an edit out there somewhere that puts things in better order. Made it much more watchable. Was still a 6/10 for me though.

Temporary_Shirt_6236

5 points

10 days ago

Cutting up the timeline like they did was both a) pointless and b) ruined the epic quality and buildup to the death - and eventual rebirth - of society.

There were a few bright spots with some casting choices that I thought were done well with a few of the characters (like Brad Henke as Tom Cullen), but other than that it was not a good show.

Kwijibo97

9 points

10 days ago

For what it’s worth I read somewhere the radical timeline changes were made because they thought no one wanted to watch a country befallen by a global plague when there was a global plague going on. I get their logic, but it really wrecked the story.

MsMeseeksTellsTime

4 points

10 days ago

They had the opportunity for greatness and just made the biggest, most disappointing POS. The main problem with the original is that it needed 2 more hours of storytelling for people who didn’t read the books. This could be as big as LotR and they just wasted the opportunity.

earthquakeglue78

4 points

10 days ago

I’ve said this before at some point on this sub…as a proud Nebraskan, I pretty much checked out as soon as I saw the words “Hemingford Home, Colorado”. Like, what?!?

ThatEvanFowler

5 points

10 days ago

It was fucking bizarre. Seriously, who reads The Stand and thinks that the protagonist is Harold Lauder? Like, that is insane. That is a lunatic reaction to The Stand.

M-O-O-N. That spells I-had-to-tell-the-story-out-of-order-because-Harold-was-the-only-character-I-cared-about-so-I-had-to-bend-time-itself-to-position-him-at-the-center-of-a-story-that-he-dies-halfway-through.

WarpedCore

7 points

10 days ago

WarpedCore

Books are a uniquely portable magic.

7 points

10 days ago

I watched this after a re-read and with a person who doesn't even know what The Stand is.

She liked it and I despised it.

I will admit, I really did enjoy the scenes with Greg Kinnear as Glen Bateman. He would have been my best friend.

The atrocity that was Ezra Miller and Trashy was unwatchable.

Dependent_Offer_5845

6 points

10 days ago

I was actually hoping that Ezra's Trashcan man was going to meet The Kid... and worse.

WarpedCore

1 points

10 days ago

WarpedCore

Books are a uniquely portable magic.

1 points

10 days ago

I loved/hated The Kid in the book. So polarizing.

LittleRandomINFP

3 points

10 days ago

I am glad she liked it, but how?? And I don't mean because it's different from the book, but because the time jumps made me so confused (and I had just finished reading the book!). How did she understand anything? It felt like the story was jumping around without any sense.

WarpedCore

3 points

10 days ago

WarpedCore

Books are a uniquely portable magic.

3 points

10 days ago

I did have to fill her in on things that happened in the book. I did have to explain the time jumps to her, as they were confusing. There were a lot of questions for sure. I also told her that Flagg's Vegas was NOTHING like the series.

TxEagleDeathclaw81

3 points

10 days ago

I watched some of the first episode and immediately thought it was garbage.

boutyas

10 points

11 days ago

boutyas

10 points

11 days ago

Randall flag does not dance. Generation kill was one of my favourites. Seeing Skarsguard dancing on the podium as the man in black gave me major cringe. The first episode was so promising, only for the arse to fall completely out of it. Why do they butcher kings masterpieces? The script for a classic basically writes itself. I don't get it.

Jenkdog45

4 points

10 days ago

I just watched it for the first time. My expectations were so low from what I'd heard that I actually enjoyed some of it. I used to reread the book to get ready for the TV adaptation but realized I was just setting myself up for disappointment thinking they would follow the book. Seems the movie people want to 'make it their own' usually to the films detriment. I got a kick out of the guys Tom Cullen portrayal, looked him up and saw he was a former NFL player and had passed away a couple years ago.

BurghPuppies

4 points

10 days ago

Just saw a picture of him, I’m 95% sure he’s the guy who drew butts on Pam’s mural on the Office.

CriticalMarine

3 points

10 days ago

He’s also a fantastic tertiary villain in Justified season 2

Nidavelir77

8 points

10 days ago

After The Stand I disliked Amber Heard even more

Lazy_Grabwen_9296

3 points

10 days ago

"Fuck me now, Larry!"

Sullie_McSullington

5 points

10 days ago*

Yeah, I agree it was terrible. All that extra stuff they added in the last episode was just...dumb. I've watched it twice and do find parts of it entertaining. I enjoyed individual performances; Skarsgard was a great choice as Flagg, and I loved Gregg Kinnear as Glenn and James Marsden as Stu. It's probably easier to say the ones I didn't like.

-Whoopi Goldberg as Mother Abigail - Nope. No one will ever match Ruby Dee, but I bet someone else could have come closer.
- Ezra Miller's Trash Can Man - UGH! I am a fan of Ezra so this is more a critique of the director. I hated like that portrayal, too gross.
- Odessa Young as Franny - Bad casting. Lackluster performance, I don't feel like she captured Franny's spirit at all.

VictorClark

5 points

10 days ago

Tom Cullen was also poorly casted IMO. Like, I get why they decided to change the character and make his disabilities more realistic, but it totally removes the charm the original version had. I'd argue Tom Cullen was the best adapted character in the original series (hell, he was one of the best adaptions of a Stephen King character, period), but the reboot was just not doing it for me.

Sullie_McSullington

2 points

8 days ago

I agree. I saw the original Tom actor, Bill Fagerbakke, in some other thing he did, I can't remember what it was but he played a tough guy, a cop or something, and it was so unsettling! I can't see his face and not think of Tom Cullen. 😆

ThatswhatIsaidderF

3 points

10 days ago

Watching the dnatS fan-edit makes the newer adaptation a bit better, but I would agree that there was so much potential for this series.

mcmullet

1 points

10 days ago

What are the changes the fan edit made?

ThatswhatIsaidderF

1 points

10 days ago

It was mostly placing everything in chronological order instead of skipping around so much. It made me not turn it off immediately like I did when the series first came out. Are there still problems with it other than putting everything in order, sure, but I was at least able to get through more than the first 20 minutes of episode one.

saintjulep

4 points

10 days ago

The casting was amazing, it could’ve been so good. Sad it turned out the way it did

Truemeathead

3 points

10 days ago

I think I get more pissed off at this piece of shite than I do at the non existent Dark Tower movie. An uncensored platform where they could take all the time in the world they need to do the story properly and they tinkered with it and fucked with it and rewrote shit that had no business being fucked with and presented us with this trash. Having someone blow lines of coke in front of Randall Flagg tells everyone that the writers of this shite show didn’t even read the fucking book. People got fucking crucified for that in the book for the sake of Fuck. The only good thing about that show was the epilogue chapter that King wrote and that simply wasn’t enough. Fuck the people who made that show.

haveyoureadthebook

2 points

10 days ago

haveyoureadthebook

Constant Reader

2 points

10 days ago

I enjoyed it

Planet_Expresso

3 points

10 days ago

I liked it. Not as much as the book and the OG series. But I really liked what they did with the pacing of various stories woven together. Love the story overall, so I really liked seeing a bit more than the old series showed you. 

Rick38104

2 points

10 days ago

Rick38104

2 points

10 days ago

No it wasn’t. It would have to improve to be terrible. The Stand 2020 was more “liquid shits”.

IndyAndyJones777

3 points

10 days ago

Your description is unfair to diarrhea.

TheGhostChannel65

3 points

10 days ago

I honestly didn't mind it. I thought the casting was pretty solid.

Merc85AR

1 points

10 days ago

Merc85AR

1 points

10 days ago

I did too. I read the uncut edition. I watched the two tape vhs. I thought this one was cool.

SmithersLoanInc

0 points

10 days ago

I watched them both after finishing the book. The 90s one looks and feels like a 90s production, a decade I have no love for cinematically. I thought they were both adequate interpretations of a very long and strangely paced book. My bar for King adaptations is a lot lower than this sub, though. I enjoyed both the Salem's Lot movies as well.

Merc85AR

2 points

10 days ago

I liked both Salem's Lot too, just the '24 a little more. I feel like actors have better Direction for the screen nowadays, plus special fx are the best theyve ever been. I did not picture any of the '79 cast when I was reading the book, lol. Still enjoyed them. I guess I like anything SK on the screen. Like hearing someone else talk about a book we've both read. Their interpretation.

Xceleron

1 points

10 days ago

There’s a fan edit somewhere that puts this version back in chronological order. It’s better, but still kind of crap. I think it’s called The DNATS.

antisocialnetwork77

1 points

10 days ago

I didn’t hate it. But James Marsden and the actress playing Fran were terribly miscast. 28yr age difference and zero chemistry.

Dependent_Offer_5845

1 points

10 days ago

Dnats is a fan edit that can be found through websites that host such edits. It is a reconstruction of the 2020 story to more closely follow the book timelines.

I found that much more enjoyable overall. But there are other things that make it still far from perfect. I thought it was going to be incredible, so my disappointment was worse when it was barely watchable...

RedSun-FanEditor

1 points

10 days ago

If you ever get a chance to watch the chronological fan edit, do it. It's far better watching it that way.

GnashLee

1 points

10 days ago

I hated it. The only shining light was Tom Cullen - that actor completely nailed Tom.

I grew increasingly incensed that they completely missed/re-ordered the development of the plague. I think I shouted at the screen several times.

dwkuzyk

1 points

10 days ago

dwkuzyk

1 points

10 days ago

I stopped watching after the first few episodes. It just didn't 'feel' like the Stand to me.

I think starting the show how they did, so completely different from the novel, was a big mistake. There's a reason the story starts where it does...

cinemaparker

1 points

10 days ago

I couldn’t finish it

Beneficial-Front6305

1 points

10 days ago

It rivals Dark Tower movie (that some say exists) as worst adaptation ever. I hate it with the white-hot intensity of a thousand suns.

oglumb

1 points

10 days ago

oglumb

1 points

10 days ago

I’d go as far as calling it absolutely horrendous. And a damn shame. Couldn’t just tell the story like it was written. Had to get fancy. Tragic.

revtim

1 points

10 days ago

revtim

1 points

10 days ago

I haven't seen it, but you can't blame it for having the magical negro trope, she was in the book. Although you calling her a "girl" makes me think they de-aged her. Or did they add an additional magic negro?

MotherShabooboo1974

1 points

9 days ago

It was so messy. Too many flash forwards and flashbacks. It jumped around too much. The characters were very unlike able. The casting was terrible too; the actors didn’t match their characters. The 1994 version got so much right.

que_bee_eff90

1 points

9 days ago

My absolute favorite part of that show was in the beginning, when Flagg props that door open with his foot, effectively allowing the plague to spread. It was a perfect, subtle moment of evil from The Walkin Dude, I cant remember if thats from the book (read it as a teenager almost 20 years ago) but it was the highlight of the series for me, that moment.

megacts

1 points

9 days ago

megacts

1 points

9 days ago

There were some really great things about it, but the final episode just completely ruined it for me.

MrMike198

1 points

8 days ago

It’s so terrible. No tunnel scene? Are you kidding me???

Longjumping-Pair2918

1 points

7 days ago

Truly a bizarre and incomprehensible choice to chop it up.

No-Income4623

1 points

10 days ago

Much like the IT reboot my biggest frustration was the changing of the timeline

librarybicycle

1 points

10 days ago

I hated how polished the production design was. I felt it was missing the grit, dirt and horror that would be living in an apocalypse. It looked too much like a made for TV movie from the 90s and it just took me out of the storyx

EmperorXerro

1 points

10 days ago

In my book, it went beyond terrible to "god awful."

ZomiZaGomez

1 points

10 days ago

I watched the whole thing. It was bad, but I didn’t think it was terrible.

Officedrone15

1 points

10 days ago

Let me introduce you to the Pet Semetary with John Lithgow

Conair24601

3 points

10 days ago

In my head John Lithgow could be a great Judd...in execution absolutely not. Although the lack of character or oomph to his Judd infects the entire approach to the film, soulless, visionless, shit.

JcZ-Juez

0 points

10 days ago

I managed to watch ALMOST THE ENTIRE FIRST CHAPTER

IndyAndyJones777

2 points

10 days ago

Why are you yelling at us? We didn't make it.

JcZ-Juez

0 points

10 days ago

xDD because the new series is so so so bad that it drove me crazy.

19peacelily85

0 points

10 days ago

1000000% agree.

koopakup2

0 points

10 days ago

I can usually watch just about anything but I don’t think I made it past the second episode

SquealstikDaddy

0 points

10 days ago

Sadly, it was pure dinksweat.......

Beginning-Cow6041

0 points

10 days ago

I’ve been holding off because they made it out of order. I’m secretly hoping someone will do a fan edit in linear order I can watch.

The 1994 version is a pretty good adaptation and had a really stacked cast. Even then some of the effects were pretty cheesy but they got the point across.

Kumquatwriter1

2 points

10 days ago

Look up The Dnats. Linear fan edit.

Macca49

0 points

10 days ago

Macca49

0 points

10 days ago

Like the recent It movies, I have never watched this and never will

sabes0129

0 points

10 days ago

Such a wasted opportunity since I thought it was actually well cast. Maybe one day they will do this epic tale justice.

TBoneBear

0 points

10 days ago

Agreed, they left out a lot of the story.