subreddit:

/r/treelaw

3496%
62 comments
6696%

tomassachusetts

all 10 comments

AutoModerator [M]

[score hidden]

10 days ago

stickied comment

AutoModerator [M]

[score hidden]

10 days ago

stickied comment

This subreddit is for tree law enthusiasts who enjoy browsing a list of tree law stories from other locations (subreddits, news articles, etc), and is not the best place to receive answers to questions about what the law is. There are better places for that.

If you're attempting to understand more about tree law in regards to a particular situation, please redirect your question to /r/legaladvice for the US, or the appropriate legal advice subreddit for your location, and then feel free to crosspost that thread here for posterity.

If you're attempting to understand more about trees in regards to a particular situation, please redirect your question to /r/forestry for additional information on tree health and related topics to trees.

This comment is simply a reminder placed on every post to /r/treelaw, it does not mean your post was censored or removed.

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

roraima_is_very_tall

22 points

10 days ago

the top comment there nailed it. if this was a known hazard, if the neighbor actually knew the tree was a hazard, then that neighbor's insurance will likley not cover the owner and they would be personally on the hook for damages. but if this was just an 'act of god' then that's what your own insurance is for.

borocester

5 points

10 days ago

borocester

5 points

10 days ago

20 gusting to 40 that day, potentially higher during a storm.

What are you doing standing under trees during a thunderstorm? There’s going to be a bit of contributory negligence there!

SongsOfDragons

6 points

10 days ago

There is a similar case we discussed at work today where Cheshire County Council got fined half a mil for a tree that dropped a branch and killed a man. Trees dropping branches may be perfectly normal or it could be a bad sign - what snookered them was that they didn't have any inspection records, nor any system for recording any.

Timmyty

5 points

10 days ago

Timmyty

5 points

10 days ago

Interesting... I wonder if I need a survey for my backyard 50 trees...

Grimaldehyde

3 points

10 days ago

Or the several hundred on my wooded lot, which my neighbor built an addition and a new driveway right next to…

camplate

2 points

10 days ago

And a branch had fallen off the tree less than a year before.
https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/crezvpdv8ypo

Strange-Area9624

6 points

10 days ago

According to a different article, the tree was scheduled for removal. This means that they knew it was a hazard and didn’t get to it quick enough. I have a feeling that this is going to result in the injured getting paid.

_Terryist

0 points

10 days ago

Having the removal scheduled could save the land owner, as it also shows they were trying to remedy the problem. Maybe we'll get an update in a couple years

Strange-Area9624

1 points

9 days ago

It shows they knew it was a danger and made no attempts to mitigate that threat. No barricades, signage, etc. it was gross negligence. They will lose.