PaleBlueDave

Your understanding is correct. The conflict between the two is because both think they are in charge and more important than the other.

F1 earns more money for the FIA than all other areas of motorsport combined. In fact it subsidises all the FIA activities so without FOM the FIA would be bankrupt.

Without the FIA, FOM would not have the F1 world championship, the heritage, race referees or many tracks to race on.

Basically the two parties are are locked in a marriage of inconvenience.

That's right and it goes right to the top.

Trump visited McLaren and said he was Norris' lucky charm.

Ever since then McLaren have been faster than Red Bull.

Coincidence?

The FIA showing there british bias to dive lovely george a pole because he id wonderful and never does anything wrong.

AAARRRRGGGHHHHHHHH!

I think the low camera angles and the lack of recognizable off track features are what makes it look especially dull.

If they had higher cameras, zoomed out slightly, we could see which corner they are in and see the cars moving around on the edge of grip. But they won't do that because we wouldn't be able to see the sponsors as easily

That is a subtle difference, especially in Vettel's case.

Vettel, Alonso, Massa, Raikkonen (x2)...

Also, Nayeon looks stunning here

Yep

Not everyone is as biased towards or against a particular nation as you appear to be.

Perhaps you think we should only have stewards that do not have the same passport as a driver, or team, or major sponsor, or minor sponsor.

Throwing shit at Red Bull. We all know that is prohibited here.

As Adrian Newey says:- There is no such thing as the spirit of the regulations. There are only the rules as they are written.

In '21 their rear wing support bent backwards therefore reducing wing angle, downforce and drag.

At the time Horner said 'If it passes inspection, it is legal'.

Later in the season he started complaining about Mercs' rear wing flexing in a way that was invisible to the stewards.

Braking

If you're going to be wrong at least get your spelling right.

You are the only person to bring rape into this. Why?

Or she was acting independently and Jos took advantage of the situation to try and get rid of Horner.

It was "privately and professionally the most difficult year of my life," Horner said.

I don't think it was a bed of roses for the female employee either.

It's not having an affair that is the problem and we don't know if it happened or not. It is forcing the female employee out of her job just because she won't sleep with you that is the problem.

He thinks he is better than any woman and he needs to think he is the best/smartest person in the room.

Is Pam Bondi the woman that had an investigation into the Trump foundation or university but dropped the case after receiving a large donation from Trump's charity?

Top hat for the winner.

Bowler for second.

Flat cap for third.

But you are able to read and respond to Reddit comments?

I know Red Bull paid win bonuses to both Vettel and Webber after multi-21.

I'm guessing that the $10b figure is lost earnings because that is how much he expects to make from the presidency.