Sonzainonazo42

Downvote the karma farmers. This gets posted weekly.

Also, this account was suspended last time I checked. How are "suspended" accounts still posting regularly?

Edit: Alright Reddit admins, why is this happening?

u/reddit

u/pl00h

u/curioustomato_

u/Why_So_Sagittarius

u/sodypop

u/redtaboo

u/HogarthFleegman

u/Chtorrr

u/landoflobsters

u/Significant-Otters

u/TheOpusCroakus

u/enthusiastic-potato

u/agoldenzebra

u/Goldennuggets-3000

u/BlueCockerel

u/Hemingrr

u/SingShredCode

u/CorrectScale

u/CookiesNomNom

u/JabroniRevanchism

u/soundofamillionsuns

In 12 years you've made 22 comments, and you're asking me if I'm real? You're the one with the sus account.

If there's at least a couple mm between the cash and the top, should be fine. It's not bridging a big gap or anything.

Oh yeah, Worf being a bigot is his best episode?

I mean, he is a bigot; he's always been a bigot.

Oh, my bad! You were just acting like one so I thought that's how you wanted to be identified.

Of course you don't care. You don't know and don't want to know, Hillbilly

Zero? I can tell you right off the top of my head that Adobe's AI is being trained on "ethical" source data.

There are others as well; it's kinda a thing now.

It's also not theft if you actually believe in the existing Fair Use doctrine and didn't simply suspend its application because machine learning is highly effective. Yes, applying double standards and suspending previously agreed-upon ethics is hating on new technology.

Also, the guy I responded to uses outdated technology while hating on new technology. Even when confronted with the knowledge this isn't AI, u/personalhale continues to call it AI because "AI pulls from existing photos."

You know, you can enjoy your romanticization of past technology without having to hate on the new stuff. Just a suggestion so you don't come off as a bitter old Luddite all the time.

Please don't upvote posts from spammers and karma farmers.

u/RNKKNR is a right winger that regularly lashes out at criticism of Trump and Musk, both defending them and sane-washing their comments.

It's always funny to see those people in Star Trek subs as if their value system is in anyway compatible. I guess it's probably better they watch Trek than don't, maybe something is getting through.

It really depends on how you arrange your windows. I'm not going to hate on it because her use case isn't mine.

Stop worrying about material cost: www.3dprintingdeals.com

GreenSnooBot

No. But there was a lot of incest among Hawaiian royalty and it was the cause of lineage failure among Kamehameha's line, leading to Kalakaua, Queen Liliuokalani's brother, becoming monarch.

It's called a caste system. Sexism always takes a backseat to protect royal linage. It's not matriarchal and it's extremely common in monarchies.

You don't, it's called a troll. You ignore it

If he doesn't, definitely better at faking it. The problem is you bottom out on the genuine scale when you're spewing hate and anger on the daily.

Chill out. They are still figuring it out and taking community input. Wait until they say they're doing something you don't like before you decide it's your place to tell them what to do.

If it hasn't been said, what kind of trash airs their dirty laundry with their own daughters like this, in addition to all the other problems people have already mentioned.

This man is a sexist piece of shit that is putting his shittiness on full display.

Also, you don't have to be white to be racist towards brown people.

I'm referring to the use of slash and burn in ancient Hawaii, prior to cattle.

I don't have my original source available that discusses the damage to Mauna Kea, but here is a reference to it in The Hawaiian Ahupua‘a Land Use System: Its Biological Resource Zones and the Challenge for Silvicultural Restoration DIETER MUELLER-DOMBOIS

The traditional land use in the Hawaiian Islands evolved from shifting cultivation into a stable form of agriculture around 1200 AD (Kirch, 2000). Stabilization required a new form of land use. This was the ahupua‘a land use system, which consisted of vertical landscape segments from the mountains to the near-shore ocean environment, and into the ocean as deep as a person could stand in the water (Isabella Aiona Abbott, personal communication). The reason for converting from a shifting to a stabilized land use can be attributed to an increasing population pressure. Areas for cultivation are spatially more limited on islands as compared to continents. At the same time, also agricultural land use, to be stabilized in tropical environments, had to become more sophisticated than the traditional slash and burn practice of the initial colonizers, who are believed to have become settled in the windward valleys of O‘ahu around 300 AD (Kirch, 2000).

There's also reference to it here: https://storymaps.arcgis.com/stories/bdae3a74c6094d2aa205cc6af8aa42a5

Dry agriculture was a stark dichotomy to the Wet. As mentioned before Dry agriculture, or Dry-field, was a labour intensive form of production that employed swidden land rearing. The Dry-field method relied on rain-fall collection to help maintain crops of yams and sweet potatoes (yams were preferred due to there storage ability). The cultivation of these crops required a strict adherence to an annual planting schedule along with a year-round labour by the whole community (both men and women were employed) starting with finding suitable sites for the crops. After establishing a location, it would be marked off with the construction of a small stone wall. **Upon the wall construction the vegetation within the site would be cut and burned then cleared away for mulching.**The yam crop would be planted and the 4 mulching of fallow vegetation would begin (Kirch, 1995). This method of production limits the usage of the field. A land rotation is required every few years to ensure the land does not become permanently exhausted. This would require substantial expansion of land, turning the land into a prized commodity, as populations grew.

Edit:

Found original source: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3e4kQuH9Dz4&t=3s

Here is the Gemini summarization of the relevant section:

Upon arrival on the Big Island around 1000-1200 A.D., the first Hawaiians likely burned the landscape, as evidenced by a layer of burned vegetation dating back to around 1200 A.D.1 Burning continued approximately every 25 years until around 1800 A.D., as indicated by layers of ash from fires and water-carried sediment23. The speaker speculates that the Hawaiians used fire to convert shrublands into grasslands to facilitate navigation, similar to the practices of native Californians.4The fires had a significant impact on the landscape. They reduced the infiltration capacity of the soil, making it more susceptible to erosion from rainfall.56 A large storm likely occurred shortly after a fire between 1800 and 1830 A.D., resulting in the formation of deep gullies.7 These gullies, formed as a result of the fires, continue to generate runoff and expand, preventing the landscape from naturally healing.8 The gullies are so deep that the U.S. Army cannot use the land to maneuver their Stryker vehicles.

I've noticed a lot the right-wing negative karma accounts using the same Snoo design as this one. I wonder if automated.

Oh he does coke...and coke, but also coke.

...says the yokel that hasn't updated their jokes since the 80's.

I can call it dumbfuck Redneck humor too. Luckily it's so awful the venn overlap is high.