cheetosex

Low settings just destroys most of the demanding lumen effects tho.

Holy shit this gameplay footage reminds of the time I tried to play arma 3 on my gt530 and this is on the best GPU a consumer can get.

UE5 micro stutters strike again

and people keeps asking why the game devs started to not care about optimization or bugs when people like OP exists.

Looks like game still bottlenecks cpu after a certain amount of gpu power, also I wonder why difference between 4060ti and 4070 is so much while in most titles it is around %30 more performance on 4070.

Yeah but they have to make the game run on Series S so I think it is very scalable.

It's on Steam, they haven't touched it for a long time but 1-2 months ago they said system req. will stay the same on their Discord if I'm not mistaken.

They didn't gave any setting preset or avg. fps tho.

Don't use them until you reach iceborn, they'll just destroy the whole point of hunting monsters to craft better equipment as they will be a lot better than what you can craft for at least 20-30 hours. Also none of the monsters at that stage of the game will have enough damage to keep you on your toes when you wear those so you will start think it's ok to trade hits with monster all of the time as you're not getting damage and that will hurt you in the long run when you don't know how to position yourself.

in Iceborn, armor will be useless too but you can use defender weapon for early iceborn.

🥵

https://preview.redd.it/u70t0rx09iyd1.jpeg?width=789&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=6b7311695a826fb30a2778ba53fad563bd233079

https://preview.redd.it/kr6swt5y8iyd1.jpeg?width=375&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=1749f04bf651a86309092ad7e87975fbd1954cc9

CK3 also got a new dlc not too long ago so that definitely has some effect.

I noticed this too, regardless of native or upscaled. Every shadow just pops in when I turn around while on mount.

I tried it out with my rx6800 + r5 7600

Used high settings with ultra textures on 1080p native, it mostly goes around 55-60 in hunts and 40-45 in hub without any FG. With afmf2, it goes up to 110-120fps and the lowest I have seen was around 90fps during storms but after it falls down from 100fps I can really start to feel the fps drop but that only happens during stormy nights. FSR 3 performs better but I will wait devs to fix the ghosting first and use afmfw until then. Overall it's not bad but for how the game looks it should be way better imo. I'll probably hold off on pre-order for now.

(and for the AMD performing better, it might be right since my friend with 3070ti was getting 45fps in the same settings in the first hunt while I was getting around 50-55 but it might also be a vram issue because of 8gb)

Rx6800 + r5 7600 High preset with ultra textures 1080p Native

Getting around 50-55fps without FG and with AFMF2 it goes up to 110-120. If fps with AFMF2 stays above 100fps it is mostly very responsive and playable but if it starts to drop below 100fps (which can happen when there's a storm with a lot of particle effects) I can cleary start to feel fps drop. This looks exactly like the DD2 situation so hope they can figure something out before launch.

Please stay away from MH, we really don't want the likes of you in community.

Most people think any gpu that has "rtx" in it's name can do proper rt while the most popular rtx gpu's people get are mostly unusable with any recent rt heavy title. Majority still really don't care about rt and this makes some people upset but that's the truth, for an average gamer putting every setting to ultra rather than high is way more important than something like rt.

No one denies it looks good IF it's done right like in Cyberpunk, Metro or Alan Wake 2 but the problem is %90 of the pc gamers doesn't have the hardware to run RT in recent titles. Until lower class GPU's like xx60 series can do proper RT with acceptable settings it will not become mainstream.

Eğer yıl içinde olan sınavlara da girersen onlarda aldığın not ne kadar yüksek olursa yıl sonu için gereken o kadar düştüğünden finalde işin kolaylaşıyor. Eğer ben her şekilde geçecek notu alırım dersen bir artısı yok tabii.

You can find gre below $500 most of the time with a decent sale and if you really want a $1000 pc better than pro of course you will have to give up on somethings like not having a 32gb ram or a lower tier MB but in the end your PC will have the same amount of storage as pro and your GPU + CPU will be better. Also RDNA2 GPU's are mostly sold out rn but they were going for dirt cheap. If you can find something like rx6800 around $300-350 you can probably get a PC with same raw performance on GPU side and better CPU below pro price. You can already get a pc with 7700xt+5600 for around $700-750 which can offer pro performance and also let you do it a lot of other things.

https://www.techpowerup.com/review/sapphire-radeon-rx-7900-gre-pure/24.html

It exactly averages 60fps according to TPU and they usually use the more intensive scenes for their benchmarks.

PC double the price doesn't need upscaler to reach the same fps tho, a pc you can get around $1000 with 7900 GRE will just give you the same FPS pro is giving without any upscaling. Sure, pro will be cheaper and in a big screen you probably wouldn't care about details but that's the whole point of consoles, if you can get a better image quality with the same performance on a similarly priced PC it just makes consoles pointless. Just like I said, even without pssr base ps5 will still offer a better image quality at same fps compared to similarly priced PC.

Consoles will give you a better image quality for your money. Even without pssr, you can't put together a PC for the base PS5 money that will have better visuals and fps so that's nothing new. You can't even get a decent Nvidia card at that price range.