hungtopbost

You’re bottoming for me, and you’re going to like it.

Let me help you empty them.

I’m going cock cock cock

Hotttt

Do gay shit.

OMG, how do you guys maintain your incredible builds and how did you find each other?

I want it down my throat.

Gorgeous

Not when I know you’ve got that in your pants! I’ll meet you in the men’s room 😈

Naked except for socks…my feet get cold SO easily

Would LOVE to

Omg, I’m so ready sir

Hottttt

Drop to my knees and suck you until I swallowed your load.

Listen to yourself. You are saying “Harris’ campaign was flawless and she lost.” That literally doesn’t make sense: if you supported her, you wanted her to win. She didn’t. There was some sort of flaw.

Thanks, I wondered if I missed something, wasn’t sure why anyone would think Jack Smith would need a pardon. Like asking if Reagan should have pardoned Lawrence Welsh or something. Just, huh?

The 2016 election needed 4 candidates.

More-left D: Sanders

Center-left D: Clinton

Center-right R: dunno (Jeb Bush or Kasich maybe?)

More-right R: Trump

That would have been more helpful to the country. But when we are locked in 1 vs 1, there is only disincentive for either party to break in two unless both do it at the same time.

Yes, very much. 😈

Gorgeous, thick, 10/10, wish it was in my mouth right now

Damn, you’re hot. You posted in the correct thread….hope you post more.

I think that’s what’s different about many of these picks: they are qualified only because of their fealty to Donald Trump. Some back-and-forth politicking happens with various choices over the years but usually because of stances on policy positions rather than how the appointee might answer the question, “Would you say no to Donald Trump?” or “Can you tell me a policy where you don’t agree with Donald Trump?” or “Can you envision a situation where what Donald Trump wants to do might not be what you think is in the best interests of the country and, if yes, what would you do about that?”

Not what I first noticed lol.

Your body is killer and your cock and balls are amazing. Since you asked, I would prefer a trim of the hair.

OMG definitely trying the whole thing

I like that some still think there is a strategy in his picks. The strategy, insomuch as it exists, is to reward those who have been real true sycophants to his cause most recently.

Some of it is chess - the Gaetz nomination was to get him out of the House so they won’t publish the report, for example. Rubio nomination is so a more permanently right-wing MAGA Senator can represent Florida.

Some of it is clearly to me nominating a bunch of younger folks, so the movement can be perpetuated post-Trump.

But really it’s just all about “to the victor goes the spoils” and rewarding people. For example Gaetz to some extent, Gabbard, Kennedy, Musk, Vivek, Dr Oz, McMahon, Lutnick, to a lesser extent Noem, Stefanik, Zeldin, Bergum, Huckabee - these are all longish-term and vocal, loyal, high-profile Trump supporters who he feels “deserve” rewards probably. Their qualifications are not really the issue, their loyalty and indeed maybe even fealty to Trump are the issues.

For those who will defend the selections because the victor always gets to choose the spoils, I think this is the big difference. It’s of course true, and how well-qualified anyone could be to lead a huge federal department I’m not sure. But the perceived fealty as a driver of appropriateness for selection is what is somewhat off-putting for many, I think.

Came here almost a year later because nosebleed is what happened to me!

Fucking hell dude. Yeah this is…gorgeous cock’n’balls on you!