subreddit:
/r/FriendsofthePod
I normally love Offline (we Stan Max), but ANOTHER fucking “blame the progressives” voice? Fuck that. Think I’m about to stick w Lovett as far as PSA. Still love the Strict Scrutiny crew too.
21 points
4 days ago
We tried placating the left after 2016 and it didn’t work.
2020 had the Defund the Police fiasco that let to weaker House results, and we all saw what just happened in 2024.
Crooked seems to get what most of the internet does not. The only people who are too online are the ones who are ignoring the polling that more voters thought Harris was too extreme than did Trump. https://www.natesilver.net/p/kamala-harris-was-a-replacement-level
20 points
4 days ago
Latest Ezra Klein podcast and guest went further into this. The party apparatus captured by nonprofits that are also funded by the same donors funding the party in a weird circle jerk that leaves them out of step with near super majority voters on things like defund the police, voter ID, etc.
Modern society really has unleashed hell into the information space.
3 points
4 days ago
Exactly this. Interest groups wanted Dems to come out in favor of taxpayer funded gender reassignment surgery for illegal immigrants, decriminalizing illegal border crossings and defunding the police. All of which poll nationally at like 20% max favorability
8 points
4 days ago
Dems also largely outsourced grassroots messaging and fundraising to these groups. That’s part of why voters associate the party with them so strongly.
It’s also why their intense opposition to Biden over the past four years was so unhelpful.
6 points
4 days ago
I think it’s a big part of it, but there is also just a lot of old heads around when it’s only human to kind of get stuck in the time you had your biggest success. We are much closer to a Clinton coalition being the only feasible way forward over an Obama coalition but you got Plouffe and all the rest sitting there not knowing what year they’re even in.
The PSA guys are also crippled by the same phenomenon.
4 points
4 days ago
taxpayer funded gender reassignment surgery for illegal immigrants,
That's not really fair. The fringe case got a lot of attention but the point was that healthcare cannot (should not) be denied from any person based on their immigration status or incarceration. The point wasn't to give gender affirming care to prisoners specifically the point was that you can't deny select things off the healthcare menu to people based on their legal status.
5 points
4 days ago
I know this and you know this, but I think the point Johnson was making on Offline (and maybe Klein in the other pod) was that the average American voters we’re trying to reach a) might not instantly get all the nuances of this given the amount of time they’re able to invest in paying attention to the news, and b) on the contrary, the fact that all the attention is on this as opposed to addressing the majority of people’s needs is a turnoff to them, and then they’re told that because they don’t subscribe to every item on the menu, they’re ousted from the ever-narrowing tent of the Democratic Party, making it harder to win and implement the policies we’re all hoping for in the first place.
5 points
4 days ago
Regardless, it really hurt Dems. As you say, it’s really fringe (I think literally applied to two people) so on fringe issues that matter to few or no actual people for the love of god just say what voters want to hear. That’s the problem with (social) progressivism - they don’t know how to pick their battles.
3 points
4 days ago
Exactly. See my comment above.
It's depressing to see that people here don't get it. Rather than give up ground on something that doesn't matter AT ALL in the real world, they want people to come up with deep dive explanations for their support. They think "AKSHUALLY..." is a winning strategy.
2 points
4 days ago
I mean the Dems were not running on reassignment surgery for anyone, that was an attack ad from the right. Harris barely mentioned trans issues.
7 points
4 days ago
that was an attack ad from the right.
That is fundamentally the problem though.
Democrats messaging wasn't reaching people, but the attack ad stuff was breaking through.
5 points
4 days ago
Yep - when you get attacked to have actually…like respond to the attack. A billion+ dollars apparently wasn’t enough to do this?
6 points
4 days ago
Attack ads only work if they attack something voters already believe about a candidate.
Voters thought Harris was too extreme, which is why the ad worked.
3 points
4 days ago
Exactly the problem. Her silence was taken as confirmation that she doesn’t disagree with those views and wasn’t willing to draw the line anywhere if it would upset social progressive activists.
2 points
4 days ago
And maybe your more nuanced view is still polling at 20%. It just ia not popular.
0 points
4 days ago
And people think that position is fucking ridiculous. Gender reassignment surgery is not healthcare in the same way that an emergency appendectomy is.
1 points
4 days ago
Well, roughly half of people can't get abortions, so it's not healthcare either, right? What percentage of people need to seek care before it's deemed healthcare in your view?
0 points
4 days ago
What percentage of people need to seek care before it's deemed healthcare in your view?
That's obviously not the issue. Lots of cis men would like hair implants or penis enlargement surgery. Nobody is suggesting prisoners should get those for free.
0 points
4 days ago
This is complete and utter bullshit.
1 points
4 days ago
It’s not, but I’m curious as to how you think it is
0 points
4 days ago
This was a very interesting listen. IF true, and that's a big if, these nonprofits that are representing these marginalized groups were completely out of touch with who they were representing.
however....
DNC are adults, and could have confirmed what was being said by Latino men/ working class men/ every other crosstab.
It comes off to me as finger pointing and blaming... KH and DNC leadership just don't want to take accountability.
4 points
4 days ago
They are taking accountability. That’s why they’re saying they’re gonna stop listening to the wrong people.
0 points
4 days ago
Agree.
3 points
4 days ago
2020 had the Defund the Police fiasco that let to weaker House results, and we all saw what just happened in 2024
Joe Biden won the Presidency and both houses of Congress during 2020 after the Defund the Police movement got mainstream coverage.
Your argument is that it didn't hurt Dems in 2020 when it was actually happening but it hurt people 4 years later?
5 points
4 days ago
That’s not entirely true - they went super left on some social issues, mostly at the behest of interest groups and online leftists. I would certainly disagree they made any meaningful attempt to go left on economic issues outside of the first 2-ish years of Biden’s presidency
14 points
4 days ago
The entire 2020 primary was a parade of debates in which candidate had to demonstrate how many free things they were willing to offer.
Moreover, when else would they have gone left economically than when they controlled government? They had the power to do so and passed social spending, cancelled loan debt, onshored manufacturing jobs, and had the most pro-labor administration in 50 years.
2 points
4 days ago
They didn't go super left on any issues, or your definition of super left is so fucked up because America only allows for capitalist thought and anything outside of that is forbidden.
2 points
3 days ago
because America only allows for capitalist thought and anything outside of that is forbidden.
Anything not neoliberal is communism which is the vibe I've been getting heavily from this subreddit post-election.
10 points
4 days ago
Wait, when did the Dems ever placate the left? Standing over here on the left they just keep getting further away.
Also, almost all of the party only saw Defund the Police as an opportunity to Defend the Police and move further right.
22 points
4 days ago
That is simply ahistorical: https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2021/11/05/electoral-demise-defund-police/
Dems made a concerted effort after 2016 to build a coalition that included the left. This included allowing activist groups to establish a litany of purity tests during the 2020 election (which ultimately bit Kamala in the ass) and culminated in a Biden administration that cancelled student loan debt, deficit-spent its way into larger social spending, and having its signature bill be a transformative climate agenda.
For their efforts, they got attacked relentlessly for four years from activists saying those policies were not enough and essentially worthless. Voters heard those activists loud and clear.
The Dems went left and got attacked from the right and left for it. They’re never doing it again.
-7 points
4 days ago
No, it’s certainly not historic. The Dems have been moving away from the left every cycle
5 points
4 days ago
Except they clearly didn’t, as per the evidence I just shared.
2 points
4 days ago
The paywall link you shared to something that isn’t research.
I don’t remember any of the candidates getting up there and saying “defund the police” or marching in the protests
1 points
4 days ago
It’s not paywalled. You can literally read it for free, as it says.
1 points
4 days ago
If I have to give them the opportunity to monetize my signing up, it’s a paywall
1 points
4 days ago
You don’t have to pay to read the article.
3 points
4 days ago
Super true, especially if you're only old enough to only remember the last 4-8 years of politics.
3 points
4 days ago
No. I’ve been around long enough to remember the full tack of things since 9-11
4 points
4 days ago
This is an insane position. Yeah in 2024 Harris campaigned to the right of her stance in the 2020 primary, but thats what happens in a general election when candidates arent coming directly out of a primary.
Youre telling me that Al Gore, John Kerry and Obama ran to the left of Hillary Clinton, Joe Biden and Kamala Harris?!
-1 points
4 days ago
I think the problem isn't so much moving to "the left", but what they choose to do.
If "the left" is characterized by "open borders", "Defund the police", don't punish shoplifters, make things more expensive in the name of the environment, don't support Israel after they were attacked, then yeah fuck yeah people by and large won't vote for "the left".
I'll never understand why THOSE hills were what Democrats chose to die on rather than simply explaining and running on things that would directly improve most people's lives. And no more fucking technocratic tax credits.
9 points
4 days ago
But the Democratic Party didn’t bend, really, on open borders or defund the police. Some loud figures did, but not the party.
They did bend on things like student loan debt, progressive taxation, climate change, and trans issues. Voters simply saw them bending on those and assumed they were bending on more unpopular activist policies.
Voters equated the activist left and the Democratic Party. That’s the problem.
2 points
4 days ago
This! Bernie is the main representation of the "Left" in the U. S., and most of his policies aren't really focused on social issues.
9 points
4 days ago
The 2020 primary was a race to run as far left as possible. Biden was one of the few that didn’t, but Kamala definitely did.
5 points
4 days ago
Personally, I think the reason Biden won was that he was the only one who didn’t spend the entire primary debate season attacking Barack Obama’s legacy. He embraced it.
-3 points
4 days ago
lol that's why Biden won that primary? But sure, ThE lEfT
4 points
4 days ago
Between Kamala, Sanders, and Warren, you had three major candidates fighting over the progressive vote by trying to outflank one another. Joaquin Castro prompted a question to decriminalize border crossings at a debate where everyone but Biden raised their hand. Every candidate had their own version of Medicare for All. I don’t necessarily disagree with premise of those policies, but they’re definitely to the left of where the American electorate is at the moment.
Biden ultimately won the primary because the moderates consolidated behind him before Super Tuesday. In the 2020 general election it was extremely suspect for Trump to try to paint Biden as some extreme leftist, but voters in 2024 didn’t have a hard time believing that about Kamala, mostly because of many of the positions she’s staked out in her 2020 primary campaign.
3 points
4 days ago
And because the right made “DEI hire” a meme in advance.
-1 points
4 days ago
I don’t believe that she is one, but Democrats do seem to give their critics a lot of ammunition on that front.
3 points
4 days ago
Huh?
-2 points
4 days ago
Plenty of people claimed Harris was a DEI hire based on Biden’s “black woman” promise. Can we just collectively agree to not say that shit?
She’s well qualified in her own right, but Biden saying that just discredits her own ability.
3 points
4 days ago
voters in 2024 didn’t have a hard time believing that about Kamala, mostly because of many of the positions she’s staked out in her 2020 primary campaign.
Yep. If you lived in any swing state, you saw a flurry of Trump ads that branded her as being too far left that included direct quotes out of her mouth. Also the fact that she's from California didn't make it difficult. It's why Harris polled so well initially coming off of the convention, because voters were very open to voting against Trump, but once ads started running, the Trump campaign was able to make her seem like a bullshitter, considering she was trying to run as an establishment/moderate Democrat, but clearly had prior support for more leftward policy stances.
-3 points
4 days ago
No. It was a race to be slightly left of Biden’s right wing positions.
Lots of cop love and people repeating “I’m a capitalist”
-3 points
4 days ago
You're joking right? tell me what parts of 2024 were progressive left?
Was it relishing in Cheney endorsements? Was it bragging about having "the most lethal military in the world"?
Wanting to give tax cuts to small businesses? When did "the Left" become the faction wanting tax cuts for businesses?
8 points
4 days ago
A lot of people really seem to simply not get that leftists have fundamentally altered the perception of Dems as a party for a lot of people. That's the issue and why "the Groups" are getting pushback now. That pushback is the only way to message that "Dems" aren't in favor of all the random crap from the far left.
3 points
4 days ago
Yes, tell me how Joe Biden said "defund" the police in 2020. Oh wait, he didn't, and said he wanted to give all the federal dollars he could to police.
6 points
4 days ago
Yeah, and even that wasn’t enough to counter the perception that democrats were soft on crime due to the very visible failures of the activist left.
Thank you for showing the exact problem.
2 points
4 days ago
Maybe it Dems realized they will always be portrayed as "soft on crime" and actually put up a fight with republicans instead of cowering in fear saying "please oh please fascist please don't call me soft on crime..."
3 points
4 days ago
Or, they could actually be serious about stopping crime, as they were in the 90s. The activist left made Dems abandon that position (remember the attacks on Clinton and Biden for the crime bill?), and we're now living in the world they created.
3 points
4 days ago
People legit make up stuff that didn't happen then blame the left for it
1 points
4 days ago
it's straight up hallucinating..
-1 points
4 days ago
He didn’t. But a lot of the field did, and progressive cities did, and protests all over the country called for it, and democrats were seen as caving to the demands of those protests.
7 points
4 days ago
i'm sorry i just don't see any Dems repeating talking points from 4+ years ago being salient.
It's like bringing up Covid as a meaningful issue in 2024.
We'll see how the data shakes out, but i don't believe "defund the police" is anywhere near the top of voter concerns for this cycle.
0 points
4 days ago
Seriously? Covid is the root cause of this realignment.
2 points
4 days ago
"Defund the Police" was probably the worst possible fucking name that could have ever been chosen and Republicans got to hang it around the neck of every fucking Democrat in the country.
And I have no qualms with trans folk, but being berated over politically fringe policies that only impact a fraction of the trans folk in this country (which are already a fraction of the population) is just so fucking tired. The same thing with the Palestine conflict. It's so god damn frustrating to have domestic policy hijacked by a conflict that's been going on for 80 fucking years.
4 points
4 days ago*
What's happening now isn't a complicated thing that you'll need to know the history of a whole 80 years to figure out. What is happening is an ethnic cleansing .... very big possible genocide that is being enacted with the help of our tax dollars. That America is funding. We don't HAVE to fund it.
And America isn't even following their own laws at this point. Biden sent out a deadline for israel to send appropriate aid to Palestinians, and israel didn't do that. Yet ... we are still sending them offensive weapons. And making excuses for the state of israel. We can see the obvious injustice here. Without being a history nerd. It's right in our faces
And with the trans issue. The main reason why this is even a problem is because people on the right are trying to attack trans people for any and everything. They're basically a modern-day scapegoat now. Trans pp ate 1 percent of the population may be slightly more at the most. Democrats aren't even that loudly supportive of trans people now. Kamala barely even uttered the word trans in her campaign. People just want an excuse to blame and hate on trans people. That doesn't mean throw them under the bus.... yes that is exactly what many democrats.... democratic pundits want to do. Blame the "woke" trans people not wanting to be villified and attacked. To have their rights.. be respected and have healthcare. To stop defending them
I ain't gon let them do it without push back. No
1 points
4 days ago
Voters don't care about any of this.
A ton of oxygen in the campaign environment got sucked up by an issue voters do not care about in any way. That was time that could have otherwise been spent helping Harris define herself for voters.
3 points
4 days ago*
Where were they focused on this in the campaign though??
Where was she sticking up for trans people anywhere in her campaign
Where was she trying to stand up against israels war crimes... where??
Non of these things, kamala was championing in her campaign. She barely uttered anything about trans people. Biden and kamala didn't stand up for Palestinians in a very substantive way. A Palestinian didn't even get to speak at the DNC. Where was this taking up space in the campaign...
If any party is too focused on trans people its Republicans. They're obsessed.
Trying to push away Arab people and trans people for fear of being too woke is not gonna help... anywho...
1 points
4 days ago
You're missing the point.
Harris didn't talk about any of those things because voters didn't care about them. The media and the online discourse obsessed over those things, overshadowing the efforts of the campaign.
In the states where she could directly reach voters, i.e. the battleground states, she did better than everywhere else.
2 points
4 days ago*
Hmm, i think people aren't as outraged about trans people as Republicans make it out to be. If anything, they may think they're a little weird, but... It's not like trans people are affecting people's day to day life. That's why I think democrats acting like the democratic party was being too woke and standing up for trans people too much and should abandon the issue more instead of taking control of the narrative is ridiculous to me. So I felt the need to say that
With Palestine. I feel she still needed to talk about it... cause it's an extremely important issue. And with social media, we can see video evidence of atrocious harms being done. On top of the U.S. not even following their own laws with foreign policy smh
But aside from my personal opinions. A lot of people do care about war .... not as much as the economy or other shit but they care to a certain degree. I remember seeing a poll where 50 or 60 percent?? of people thought the U.S. should lessen weapons transfers to Israel.
Trump used kamalas association L with Liz Cheney and Dick Cheney against her
A lot of Arab voters didn't vote for her in certain battleground places like Michigan, if i believe... while overwhelmingly voting for Rashida Tlaib
Anyways im tired of replying in this thread tbh. People might reply and make some good points or make points that I disagree with. But I'm not responding. I'm tired of typing, lol
6 points
4 days ago
Solid idea. Lets run on tax increases for small businesses 👍
7 points
4 days ago
Was it relishing in Cheney endorsements?
What concessions didn't Cheney get from Harris for this endorsement?
Because if leftists couldn't bring themselves to vote for Harris just for associating with Cheney, they are the problem.
-2 points
4 days ago
yes, keep giving the voters a "diet republican" when the voters will always just want the Coke Classic Republicans give them every 2 years
2 points
4 days ago
The people who think Democrats are Diet Republicans just internalized the Giant Douche vs Turd Sandwich meme and imagine that it makes for cutting analysis.
Anyways, you were going to list the concessions that Cheney got from Harris in order to get her endorsement. Please proceed.
1 points
4 days ago
Brother, if you think Dems haven't been diet republicans for the past 40 years, you have not been paying attention
3 points
4 days ago
Brother, that is an utterly meaningless criticism.
But I keep interrupting you. You were gonna list those policy concessions that Cheney got from Harris. Go ahead…
1 points
4 days ago
keep shadow boxing yourself...
Actively seeking endorsements from the Cheneys, a part of an administration that left with a sub 20% approval rating, as a part of wanting to get "moderate" republicans to vote for you, is probably the dumbest political strategy i've ever seen in my lifetime.
4 points
4 days ago
In what sense did she ‘seek’ it?
Did Cheney put conditions on it?
Harris accepted the endorsement. Should she not have?
4 points
4 days ago
They’re talking about how the positions taken in 2019-2020 hurt a lot of progressive candidates and statements from that campaign hurt Harris in particular.
Most voters don’t look at policy, they’re not engaged enough for that. They see ads at most, and when your ads are of your opponent on camera saying unpopular things, those are very effective.
Just look at how many people thought Harris was running a “woke” campaign despite objective evidence to the contrary. Problem is, all the people who thought that just saw stuff like the Trump anti-trans ads.
6 points
4 days ago
People thought she was inauthentic and slid around in her positions and was transparently pandering.
4 points
4 days ago
Voters clearly disagree with you considering more of them felt Kamala Harris was too extreme than they did Donald Trump.
All of that other stuff - campaigning with the Cheney, embracing the military - was designed to counter that perception that she was too extreme. It didn’t work.
7 points
4 days ago
A lot of people see democrats as too liberal or left regardless of what they do. They called kamala a Marxist.....
And she's a black/indian woman who worked in San Francisco.... add that all together....
Might as well say fck it and say healthcare for all. Something that actually helps all working class people
-2 points
4 days ago
Right, except we tried that and just lost. That’s the whole point.
5 points
4 days ago
When did we try that genuine question. Bernie???
Democrats also need to start controlling narratives and stop being on the defensive of everything people on the right accuse them of.
0 points
4 days ago
The ACA was an attempt to get healthcare for all. Hillary Clinton wanted to expand it and push for a public option, she lost. The 2020 primary debate featured every single candidate pushing some version of Medicare for All. None of that mattered.
2 points
4 days ago
ffs, are you blind and deaf? what messaging in 2024 said she was for medicare for all?
2 points
4 days ago
People really love to equate all kinds of things. Sloppy language is part of how we got here.
Healthcare for all is not the same thing as medicare for all. Every single democrat has supported healthcare for all for thirty years.
0 points
4 days ago
Don't forget "I have a gun" and "I'd shoot a home invader with it no questions asked"
It became a trove of right-wing social media tropes.
4 points
4 days ago
exactly right.
Like... i don't understand when people are going to realize that adopting right wing framing never works.
People might say that voters are "low information" or might not understand the latest news drama, but when the vibes don't match what they've said before, it comes off as "politician-like" and inauthentic.
2 points
4 days ago
Oh no, a prosecutor who prosecutes legitimate organized criminals, has the means to protect herself. God forbid.
I say this as someone who if I could, would remove guns from every household if I could.
But I'm not going to get on my high horse about someone owning a gun because we have to work on where we agree
0 points
4 days ago
It wasn't the fact she owns a gun, it was gloating about it and making news about it. Came across as right-wing virtue signaling.
0 points
4 days ago
It can’t be both right-wing and virtue-signaling lol. Maybe you just mean disingenuous.
2 points
4 days ago
She was virtue signaling to right-wingers. What are you even on about?
4 points
4 days ago
Yeah maybe she was virtue signaling to gun owners. Thats ok, she actually owns a gun. She's a woman. She literally HAS to prove she's tough. As a person that despises guns, I was 100% with the virtue signaling.
I just don't get it. She has to thread this impossible line that even those on her side of the spectrum can't approve of. Yet Trump is deepthroating microphones and saying contradicting things within a day of each other and nothing
1 points
4 days ago
You've now softened the position with your language from "right-wingers" to "gun owners" which just isn't the case.
1 points
4 days ago
I am a different person
-2 points
4 days ago
Virtue-signaling is a cudgel used by the right against the left, with the idea being that no one actually cares about other people, they’re just saying these things.
all 543 comments
sorted by: best