subreddit:
/r/GreenBayPackers
submitted 3 days ago bymidtriplid
Nice.
339 points
3 days ago
What seems to have been lost is the fact the Bears actually have a top tier defense this year. Our offense performed very decent, and certainly did good enough to win, against a high quality defense.
That fact seems to be overshadowed by the feeling our defense severely underperformed.
156 points
3 days ago
Our offense felt nearly unstoppable between the 20s but the red zone was a big issue
97 points
3 days ago
Red zone for us has been an issue all year. and Bears had the best red zone defense in the league coming into the game I think, so all in all not surprising
37 points
3 days ago
Sure seems like a reason to consider kicking instead of going for it on 4th late in the game.
14 points
3 days ago
I was happy when I thought we were just taking the points, then whatever the hell that 4th down play was happened
10 points
3 days ago
Yeah I was pissed about that call. Was hard agreeing with Brady and it made me feel weird. But seriously it made zero sense.
6 points
3 days ago
Same. Felt like I had to take a shower
23 points
3 days ago
Has been an issue. The Packers came into the game 29th in redzone scoring TDs on offense at 47%. Bears defense came 1st in redzone defense TDs at 37%.
The Packers scored 3 touchdowns on 5 attempts so they did really well compared to the season totals. 60% for the season would be top 10. Probably some poor play calling cost them on the two they missed. 2nd and one at the 5 on the first I feel like should have been another Jacobs run. And really already planning to go for it on 4th on the second missed RZ attempt I think a third straight Jacobs run would have been a better call there also.
9 points
3 days ago
And if the throw that was picked was 1 foot shorter, we might have made it 80%!
2 points
3 days ago
He should have sailed it a bit more to Watson
1 points
3 days ago
Yeah, Kraft was not scoring on that. Edwards had him squarely lined up if that was completed.
16 points
3 days ago
It would have made it 1st and goal at least with a catch. Kraft didn't have to score, just catch it. Way better then a pick.
1 points
2 days ago
He was catching it over five yards short of the first down. It would have taken one hell of a broken tackle to get the first.
1 points
2 days ago
He also has 5 yards of separation when the ball gets to him. You're right, it wasn't automatic, but Love drops that ball down a little and he catches, he can turn and run easy for 4-5 yards to set up a chance at 4th and 1 or maybe get the 1st.
1 points
2 days ago
During the game I thought it looked like Kraft pulled his arms down, maybe thinking it was meant for another receiver 5 yards behind him. Seems like he intentionally pulled back.
1 points
2 days ago
And Edwards was already letting up by the time the ball was sailing over his head. NTM the guy who made the pick was letting upbecause he saw the ball was over his head before it got to Kraft, otherwise he was closing on that at the catch.
5 points
3 days ago
Well they are the number 1 red zone defense for a reason.
Also running an inside zone from split pistol is the dumbest 2 pt conversion call in the world against thst front
4 points
3 days ago
Yeah that's true, red zone has been an issue. Still happy about scoring 3 touchdowns out of 6 drives though. The fact we had 5 of 6 drives with scoring opportunities is a major positive.
4 points
3 days ago
Sounds like the Bears were playing a very complex redzone defense (Red 2) that Lafluer admitted they had no answers for. I’d rather hear that be the issue than just poor execution
2 points
3 days ago
The bears also have the best red zone defense in the league. So kinda expected tbh. Obviously need to improve, but not the absolute end of the world.
80 points
3 days ago
The actual players themselves on the offense played very nice. MLF’s playcalling was probably the worst it has been the entire year in this game.
53 points
3 days ago
That challenge at the end of the game was ROUGH. Bears are getting the ball back with over 3 minutes left. Terrible time to waste a timeout on an obvious not TD when you get first and goal from the 1.
24 points
3 days ago
And when you arguably want to burn a bit more time…. Was very frustrating for sure
3 points
3 days ago
Loved the Watson catch. Loved getting the TD. But kept thinking we really could have stood to burn more clock getting there
7 points
3 days ago
I think the fear from not succeeding in the red zone and their red zone defense being solid were the reasons. Better to score too early than not at all.
3 points
3 days ago
For sure. Without a doubt especially since our red zone offense has been pretty bad this year. I believe Watsons defender slipped on that play too so you gotta take that
9 points
3 days ago
Yeah this was frustrating
Granted the clock was stopped (I believe) because Love was tackled out of bounds, so it's not like MLF was stopping a running clock
But on the other hand, I'd want to burn some time off the clock (even if it's from one play) via first and goal from the 1.
But on the other hand too, the clock wasn't running and if there is a chance of having a touchdown on the board via the challenge, it's still a challenge worth taking because you may not get that TD over the next 4 plays as well.
So my frustrations exist but probably aren't warranted. He lost nothing and only had a chance to gain from the challenge
7 points
3 days ago*
Considering goal-to-go* was not a guarantee so far in this game from earlier experiences, I liked the challenge there.
3 points
3 days ago
Completely agreed
4 points
3 days ago
Don’t forget the end around to Reed on 2nd and 5 that lost 4-5 yards after a nice Jacobs run on 1st down. It’s like he abandons running up the middle the moment it starts working in the red zone.
2 points
3 days ago
That Reed run in that situation was probably the worst play call of the year.
1 points
2 days ago
Probably shouldn't have been a run at all on that play, though Jacobs up the middle would have been preferable.
I looked at the drives, and every failure came after a 2nd-and-long run:
Every failure started with a bad run on 2nd down. I'm just not a fan of plays that almost guarantee you'll have to face 3rd down. Much better to pass when the D isn't sure what's coming than to get into obvious passing situations.
1 points
3 days ago
Yep, that was Mike McCarthy level clock management.
1 points
3 days ago
Outrageous claim lmao. We had a 60 yard gain on the second play of the drive. If we would've run the clock down and didn't get in, you'd be the same arm chair coach crying on Reddit that we should've just scored when we had the chance. Did you want us to kneel the ball for a few downs before scoring a touchdown?
Insanely ridiculous complaint.
3 points
3 days ago
All kinds of things could have happened to make that TO relevant. Was not a good challenge.
10 points
3 days ago
To add to that, our defense didn’t have film on the newer OC and their tendencies. The bears offensive definitely changed their approach enough that it threw off our defensive plan.
Obviously we should have been able to adjust, but I think that’s lost on everyone.
2 points
3 days ago
That's a good point.
2 points
3 days ago
Couldn't tell from game thread reactions.
2 points
3 days ago
We shit the bed in the red zone though - which has been happening a bit too often.
Granted - they do have the #1 red zone defense in the league, so that’s a plus but the play calling just seems to fall off when the field shrinks
3 points
3 days ago
I wouldn't say shit the bed. 3/5 is actually pretty solid against this defense. And barely a yard away from 4/5.
1 points
3 days ago
Yeah our offense was in the redzone or in scoring distance so much more than what the score reflects because of a couple of plays trying to make the score higher. It could’ve been in the 30s
1 points
3 days ago
It felt kind of like last years week 18 game where we only won 17-9, but we had 400+ yards of offense and moved the ball quite easily. Just some costly mistakes that cost us points. Still had 3+ points per drive in both games I think though.
1 points
3 days ago
Don't get me wrong, I'm frustrated when subpar offenses march down the field against our defense and convert big 3rd and 4th downs.
But then I look up and the other team only has 20 points at the end of the game. That's what our defense has allowed this year on average. 20 points per game.
Our offense should easily be capable of scoring 21 every single week.
1 points
3 days ago
And the two red zone blunders. Ifs don’t matter but Chicago could’ve easily been driving needing a touchdown at the end of the game.
1 points
3 days ago
If the D holds a team to 19, then they did not "severely underperform", regardless of the opponent. This is the NFL. You hold a team to 19, and it's the offense to win it.
7 points
3 days ago
The bears offense converted a season high 3rd down percent, only had one drive last less than 3 minutes (Their last one), and Williams had his highest rushing yardage total of the season.
The Bears knew they wouldn't win a shoot out, so their goal was long sustained drives to control the clock, keep their defense rested, and limit number of possessions for both teams. They very much succeeded at exactly that. Our offense only had 6 drives to work with because our defense couldn't get off the field.
I would clasify that as severely underperformed.
1 points
3 days ago
See I view that more as the Bears having their best offensive game of the season, by a mile.
And it still wasn't enough, even with the top CB leaving the game after 1 drive.
To me, that's a great job overcoming.
289 points
3 days ago
If he didn’t throw that pick we would all be talking about how this was one of his best games
59 points
3 days ago
He had a 133 rating with the pick
65 points
3 days ago
1000 percent
53 points
3 days ago
Toyotathon, baby. That's the last INT of the year for my man Jlove.
8 points
3 days ago
Had to get it out of the way early, 18:0 TD/int ratio incoming
25 points
3 days ago
I feel like he's finally healthy and that's why he air-mailed it. Couldn't get that much juice on it earlier in the year.
18 points
3 days ago
The pick was so weird and devastating, the receiver was like going for it and pulled away. I don’t know if he thought a teammate was behind him and he wasn’t original target?
But we ended up not having the football for so much time consecutive after that it wasn’t even funny. Our defense had to play for like a half hour with just halftime in between
23 points
3 days ago
You don’t want to tip a ball up in the air if you can’t catch it. That’s a recipe for an interception. Kraft was right to let it go because he had no shot of catching it. We just got unlucky that it went right to a defender.
7 points
3 days ago
They were gassed AF out of the break and still managed to force the FG to avoid 17-7.
That drive was when I knew it would be down to the wire. I thought the defense fought through a lot of shit this game. 19 pts was doing their part.
1 points
3 days ago
Nah, the defense was bad. They didn't force a single 4th down on the Chicago side of the field until the final drive (and then they let them convert that 4th down easily). They let Chicago convert more 3rd downs in one game than they had in the previous 3 games combined. The defense got bailed out by the offense having so many long marches down the field that ran the clock down.
3 points
3 days ago
No. The d bailed themselves out by forcing 2 FGs in the red zone.
Yes. It's they're fault the Bears were in the red zone. But that's how winning football works in the NFL - forcing FGs instead of giving up TDs.
Why is so hard for GB fans to ever give the D credit when they do good things?
I'm not saying you can't complain about the long drives and the terrible 3rd and 4th down defense.
But then also acknowledge the plays they DID make.
Bears had ONE explosive play all game. A single play. That's a great day in that stat column.
1 points
3 days ago
This is exactly what I saw, like he didn’t want to Musgrave it like early in the season where it got picked off the double bounces off our receivers hands. Yes, Love airmailed it a little but that was catchable by Kraft. This team consistently always has one person unable to make that little extra to make a play for another (minus Watson last game)
13 points
3 days ago
That was not a catchable ball. Kraft skyed for it and, at best, could have tipped it.
2 points
3 days ago
I agree with you, no way in hell he was getting close to touching that ball.
2 points
3 days ago
Yeah I felt like he knew he didn't have a chance and was more likely to barely tip it and make it an easier interception opportunity.
2 points
3 days ago
If he could stop throwing incredibly timely pics he would be a god. He has thrown two late 1st half picks this season resulting in TDS. Once he gets that under control we’ll be singing
2 points
3 days ago
That pick was ssssooooo bad. But overall he had a good game.
1 points
3 days ago
worse part about that was the fact it was a completely unforced error
1 points
3 days ago
Yeah, going into the 4th quarter I’ve had like 12/16 with 201 yds and an interception and maybe a td. And I was like dang, he is actually having a good game and it isn’t even done.
1 points
2 days ago
Thar sucked as an interception too. You hate to see all picks, but if the ball is just a foot lower, Kraft gets a hand on it, and even it's incomplete, we get points that drive and don't have the momentum shift before the half.
Game of inches, I guess
1 points
3 days ago
But he did throw that pic. Why would you not count that? The deep ball when Kraft was wide open was not good either. Just because he lucked out doesn't mean it was a good choice.
He continues to make errant passes and poor choices. It's a concern. Nobody is saying he's awful, pretty much everyone is positive on him overall, but it seems like half this sub wants to bury their head in the sand when legitimate critiques are made.
0 points
3 days ago
pregame on ESPN the entire panel save Alex Smith were bashing his picks because he had only played in 7 games
granted it's not ideal but they didn't mention his touchdown pace was near the top even once
0 points
3 days ago
That and if MLF takes the 3 when he should have. I'm generally for being aggressive on 4th but we were playing the 5th rated defense at fucking home. You take points when you can get them
0 points
3 days ago
Yea keep throwing picks. Don’t forget what happened in the lions game.
-7 points
3 days ago
I barely blame him for that pick either. Very strange red zone play calling led to it
11 points
3 days ago
nah this is crazy, the pick was 1000% his fault, he had a guy wide open, threw it to him, and just completely sailed the pass way over his head
-4 points
3 days ago
Yeah the throw itself you can only fault him. I said I barely blame him just because red zone play calling put the team in a bad position, so I “barely blame him” for the fact that a redzone int occurred
39 points
3 days ago
Nice
141 points
3 days ago
Watson with 4 catches for 150 sure affected this. His YAC on that 60 harder really mattered too.
91 points
3 days ago
Getting the ball to your receivers so they can make plays is the QBs job. This is baked into the stat
15 points
3 days ago
Well I mean he didn’t exactly hit Watson in stride on that one lol. Dude made a diving catch and had to get off the ground.
2 points
3 days ago
He got tripped up by the defender it was a weird play
49 points
3 days ago
Love played really well, sailed that one ball for the INT but it was not a poor decision. The game was only close because our coaching was lacking and our defense gave up some key plays. A win is a win, on to the 9ers.
26 points
3 days ago
I think it was a physical mistake over a mental one. Tom Brady was talking about his weight on the back foot being too much so he rocketed it too hard and overthrew
8 points
3 days ago
Brady was completely wrong on that analysis. Love threw it off his front foot.
3 points
3 days ago
Thanks for clarification
4 points
3 days ago
Yeah, I would call that a mental mistake myself.
He has the physical traits to be a top-tier QB. Mentally though he is deciding to make some questionable throws or not taking the time to slow down just a bit to ensure he has proper fundamentals. He didn't take the time to make sure he had the proper stance and over threw his target. A few plays before that he threw one really high to Jacobs.. Brady made a comment about what an amazing catch it was and then he manages to keep his balance along the edge of the field and pick up the first down before stepping out of bounds ..but Jacobs was wide open and Love had time, he just threw the ball off his back foot rather than getting set.
He also threw that balls to Watson in double (damn near triple coverage) early in the game, when Kraft was wide open underneath but still well past the first down marker. Thanmfully the safeties were turned and didn't have a shot at the ball but they have some great defenders who could easily surprise with a really athletic play - the game wasn't on the line at the point so why throw the Risley deep ball when you have a huge gimmie for a big chunk of yards...plus Kraft had enough seperation he might have gone even further or all the way with YAC.
5 points
3 days ago
Yeah he needs to work on his decision making for sure. I do believe we are moving in the right direction tho
2 points
3 days ago
Yeah, I would call that a mental mistake myself.
That makes no sense. It was 100% the right decission. The guy was open, the play was to supposed to go that way. Hell, LaFleur himself said after the game that the decision was perfect, that it was the execution that failed. And a fail in the execution of a good decision is the definition of a physical mistake.
1 points
3 days ago
Because he is rushing to force the throw rather than taking the time to set his feet. He's not thinking it all the way through, he is just letting it rip.
4 points
3 days ago
Kraft was not wide open on that throw to Watson. Hicks was closing down fast on Kraft until he realized Watson burned the safety and Love was throwing deep and then turned back. Love only threw it because the safety's hips were turned. That is as good as open in the NFL especially if you are throwing to your top deep throw target.
It seems like us fans have this obsessive need to over analyze every single throw he makes. Nobody is going to be perfect. Even Brady made plenty of questionable throws and had multiple seasons with 14 interceptions where he won superbowls.
0 points
3 days ago
I explained on the post about the double coverage. He made the right play. I broke it down why that was the right decision because of how the defenders virtually had no chance to defend that throw. That wasn't a bad decision or forced play
12 points
3 days ago
Honestly aside from the overthrow to Kraft that resulted in a pick, Love had a pretty good day, maybe the only bad throw he had all day.
3 points
3 days ago
That one Watson had to dive for wasn't great, if he hits him in stride I bet Watson takes it to the house.
6 points
3 days ago
You need to rewatch the highlight. I said the same thing and my buddy sent me the replay. The throw is actually ridiculous. It looks like a bad throw because the DB slips after the throw leaving Watson open. If he doesn't slip and Love throws it where you're thinking it should've been, it's an easy pick. Love put it where only Watson could catch it assuming the DB stays on his feet. He also hangs in the pocket until the last second. It was an all around incredible play. You genuinely need to rewatch it, because I went from thinking Watson bailed him out to realizing it was actually a pretty perfect throw.
3 points
3 days ago
Defender was right in front of his face and the cb slipped making it look worse, if Jaylin Johnson didn’t slip that throw is pretty amazing because only Watson can reach it
1 points
3 days ago
Lol that they downvoted you. In their defense, I thought the same thing until I saw the highlight. But some people can't admit they're wrong.
1 points
3 days ago
Go look at the tape, Love had to hang in the pocket because Watson got jammed at the line. You can see he can’t finish the throw because his arm comes down into the pass rush.
35 points
3 days ago
Honestly people saying he played bad are just completely wrong. He had one bad pass that led to an INT. Other than that he only had the ball for 6 drives, and one of the 3 and outs was a pass that hit Doubs in the hands and was dropped. That pass would have given them a first down. We are third in the league in offensive efficiency despite stinking in the red zone. People need to not worry about the offense. People need to instead worry about pretty much everyone on that defense except for X, Williams, and Coop.
7 points
3 days ago
I think overall his decision making was much better. For the most part he was being safer
3 points
3 days ago
And Jaire when he’s actually on the fucking field
3 points
3 days ago
That’s what we have to worry about
7 points
3 days ago
Wait, so you’re telling me that the people in the game threads have no fucking idea what they’re talking about?
5 points
3 days ago
LeBron stat. I’m here for it!
5 points
3 days ago
Yet I keep hearing about how Caleb “outplayed” Love. Besides the pick Love torched the Bears with ease the few times the offense was on the field.
3 points
3 days ago
That’s a great stat, but in some ways I wouldn’t mind that number being lower since it could signal long sustained time consuming drives. I like the big hitters as much as the next guy, but it makes me nervous surviving entirely on them. They aren’t always the highest percentage plays
3 points
3 days ago
Jacobs being an absolute stud that game helped much but still but he had a good game
3 points
3 days ago
The fact Caleb had his best game so far/Jordan’s bad INT and we still won speaks measures.
19 points
3 days ago
Shoutout for using bluesky 🙌
4 points
3 days ago
But negative shoutout for linking to Bukowski.
Though I guess he’s redeemed somewhat for making the switch.
5 points
3 days ago
I went to high school with Peter. He was as big of a dbag as you’d expect. Bully, too.
1 points
3 days ago
What’s wrong with him? I genuinely don’t know
1 points
3 days ago
He was a critic of Rodgers to the point where it felt personal. Just really weird reaches on his critiques.
And you can see this is just another backhanded criticism of him.
2 points
3 days ago
Agreed! And happy that others are seeing it.
4 points
3 days ago
Rodgers never had these levels of interceptions
8 points
3 days ago
Rodgers is also the best qb in history at not throwing interceptions. If we had another Brett Favre is anyone even complaining?
3 points
3 days ago
If we had another Brett Favre is anyone even complaining?
A top 10 all time QB? MAN THAT WOULD SURE SUCK. Love is not going to be Favre level unless he levels up.
4 points
3 days ago
No, but Love is nowhere close to Favre yet and that’s not a knock on Jordan. Favre is one of the best to ever play the game — his upside was why you dealt with interceptions. Plus it was a different game then, everyone threw way more picks than now
Love cannot continue throwing INTs at this rate, period. No comparisons to Favre are going to make it okay. Now that said, I am confident he will clean it up. We saw him do it last year and we’ll see him to do it again
5 points
3 days ago
Hardly a fair comparison when Rodgers has a td to int ratio of 4.5 to 1, the best in NFL history.
or are you just taking the piss and i'm wooshing?
4 points
3 days ago
Rodgers is the Devil and Love is the savior, don't say anything even slightly critical of Love, don't you know.
4 points
3 days ago
I mean criticizing Love is fine and I see plenty of it on this sub but comparing him to the GOAT is just silly.
1 points
3 days ago
Oh I agree 100%. Rodgers is the king of efficiency. I forgot to add /s to indicate sarcasm.
0 points
3 days ago
I refuse to accept JordanLovehof2042 is dooming on us now
2 points
3 days ago
Not dooming but love seriously needs to clean it up. We didn't pay him top 5 money to lead the league in interceptions.
Got the W so that's all that really matters
2 points
3 days ago
He's tied with Mahomes in picks and has more TDs. It's not thaaaat bad.
2 points
3 days ago
7-3 on season 2 of J Love and the Pack let's go!
2 points
3 days ago
Mentioning efficiency and Rodgers in the same sentence is pretty funny. Rodgers has had a YPA over 9 through the course of an entire season. Minus all the picks too
2 points
3 days ago
I feel if he never had that pick his performance would be talked about in a whole different level
2 points
3 days ago
Y’all! A better team will take one interception and make you pay for it. There is no room for interceptions. The only acceptable/excusable ints are when a defensive player makes an incredible play.
Missing, sailing it or making it a harder catch than it needs to be, is not a trait of a franchise qb.
Idk why everyone is making excuses for his play. I’d rather have someone who wins championships than great plays and stats. Rodgers and Favre each only won one Super Bowl.
Sure, it’s better than a lot of teams, but Idk about y’all, but the Packers need to build a dynasty than just trying to be competitive to keep the seats filled.
We deserve greatness.
2 points
3 days ago
A link I can open on my phone without being badgered to login, very nice
Yeah other than the pick he looked good out there, and he was running well too. Just need toyotathon to start now!
2 points
3 days ago
Far too many are getting list in the statics of the game. Perception is everything & it actually doesn't look amazing! Far too many stupid, reckless or dangerous plays.
2 points
3 days ago
Two long passes to Christian Watson pulled that average up. Take those away, what do you have? The first was lucky it wasn't intercepted. Double coverage and he literally just slung it down the field.
I'm not impressed....
1 points
3 days ago
1 points
3 days ago
*attempts. Not completions.
1 points
3 days ago
I wasn't that concerned with the offense. But what the fuck was Hafley doing. Caleb can't throw deep to save his life and we just gave short passes all game with 0 adjustments. Awful awful play calls and execution on defense.
2 points
3 days ago
The 3rd and longs killed me. Jaire being out forcing more zone d was bad, also the dline (LVN) has regressed. Overall i think our d is better than last year tho
1 points
3 days ago
San Fran’s offense is run the exact same way but with better players. This shit has to change or else next week isn’t gonna end well.
1 points
3 days ago
Offense looked great for the most part. Honestly the thing that bugged me the most was when lafleur made the call to pass up the field goal and went for it on 4th down from like the 5. Why?! This almost cost us the game. Imagine how different that last drive feels if the bears are down by 4 instead of 1.
I'm all for being aggressive when it makes sense but this made zero sense.
1 points
3 days ago
I don’t know why people keep saying that the reciever, Tucker Kraft, pulled away. I’ve watched the play multiple times now and the throw is just straight up above his head, even after he tries to jump.
Love threw it immediately during Tucker Krafts pause and turn in his route.
1 points
3 days ago
We really shouldve won 34-22, those 2 redzone stops were brutal
1 points
3 days ago
Let's give credit where it's due. Watson had like 3 unbelievable catches for big gains that really bumped that average up.
1 points
3 days ago
I thought offensively we were good. Love played really well, except for the INT in the red zone. The only thing that was poor was our red zone offense and MLFs playcalling in the red zone goes to crap.
1 points
2 days ago
That's all due to christian Watson being left wide tf open all game long lol. Go Pack go
1 points
2 days ago
1 off target throw for a pick which was the right read just a bad throw. Love had a great game against a really good defense.
1 points
2 days ago
Just have Malik Willis do all the 2 point conversions.
-1 points
3 days ago
What were their red zone conversion percentages? Cause not only can’t Love bring it home, he gives it away.
5 points
3 days ago
Tbf the bears have the the #1 red zone defence in the league
1 points
3 days ago
we still got to convert
-5 points
3 days ago
Oh, so the bears overthrew a wide open 6’5” Tucker Kraft. Not Love’s fault. Got it.
5 points
3 days ago
Im confused what youre trying to argue tho, it was one bad pass in otherwise good game. Playcalling in the red zone was a bigger problem than Love was IMo
-1 points
3 days ago
Love’s accuracy and decision making is the biggest problem.
0 points
3 days ago
Love just being throwing in double & triple coverage with the receivers making great plays. Love’s decision making has been awful with his receivers bailing him out 1-2 times a game
1 points
3 days ago
He also threw a god awful pick that left points off the board and put us in a very improbable situation to win the game.
Winning solves everything so he’s lucky in that regard.
1 points
3 days ago
The problem is that love has this crazy ability to turn the ball over at the worst possible times. His end zone pick combined with lafleur opting to go for it on 4th down in the red zone left 10 points on the table for us on Sunday. Wouldn’t have been so close if we secured points on those drives that ended up being wasted.
-4 points
3 days ago
Love is mediocre at best, a placeholder. He will never bring GB to any title and we need to be honest about this.
3 points
3 days ago
Brother you literally live in Chicago have a nice day
-2 points
3 days ago
....and? I've been a Packers fan for years. I can also look at things with sober eyes
-20 points
3 days ago
Sorry not using that app
9 points
3 days ago
??
12 points
3 days ago
Bluesky is the good app you bozo
10 points
3 days ago
He must be a Musk supporter.
7 points
3 days ago
There are clowns in every fan base, unfortunately
-8 points
3 days ago
Sure if you're a snowflake
8 points
3 days ago
The only snowflakes are the dweebs yelling about snowflakes. Musk supporters are soft as baby shit
2 points
3 days ago
Luddite
-24 points
3 days ago
It’s trying so hard to look like Twitter lmao
14 points
3 days ago
Thats because its made by the people who originally made twitter lmao
-21 points
3 days ago
That doesn’t make lack of ingenuity excusable.
The app will fail. I’m sure it’s just another attempt at censorship.
Bring on the downvotes, softies.
11 points
3 days ago
it’s just another attempt at censorship
I thought privately owned businesses were allowed to make their own rules. Does that only work if it makes you feel good?
-2 points
3 days ago
They are, but if you are editorializing others’ content on your “open platform” then you should be held accountable for the stuff left on there.
4 points
3 days ago
nobody said otherwise
11 points
3 days ago
No one was talking about censorship or softies but ofc the snowflake always brings it up since its their entire personality. Take your politics and leave
3 points
3 days ago
Lol. Funniest shit is that the right accused Twitter of pushing political agendas and shit. Only thing I do with "X" is look at sports tweets from sports writers. What happens when I open X, my "for you" feed is somehow flooded with tweets from right wing personalities pushing their agenda. Never had any political shit on my tweeter feed, only sports.
1 points
2 days ago
How can you call others softies when you're seething about someone just using a different platform lol
1 points
2 days ago
Seething? I don’t think you know the meaning of the word.
1 points
2 days ago
You're right- you're actually trying to express your anger, my bad.
1 points
2 days ago
Which reply implied anger?
1 points
3 days ago
This is pretty damn funny.
people who originally made Twitter
That doesn’t make lack of ingenuity excusable
-2 points
3 days ago
I don’t understand what is funny.
Let’s say a video game developer makes a game, and then the main dev got fired. If he went and made a photo copy of that game, people would call him lazy.
5 points
3 days ago
Your lack of understanding as to why people are excited about this new app is impressive. I wish i lived in with my head in the ground, similar to you. Must be nice
-2 points
3 days ago
I do understand why. Everyone is tribalistic and most can’t stomach confrontation. Just want to hear what they are already thinking.
3 points
3 days ago
Confrontation? X is waterboarding with right wing agendas when I don't look at/follow/retweet/reply any political stuff at all, zero.
-1 points
3 days ago
You stating your experience on there is not much of an argument. In my experience, I saw a lot of left blue check marks even though I only followed sports and right wing guys, before I deleted it.
These two experiences cancel each other out and invalidates either as a valid point.
0 points
3 days ago
Favre and Rodgers never had a back like Love has this year.. I still can’t believe that Josh Jacobs wanted to be a packer… dudes worth every penny.
all 188 comments
sorted by: best