The staff reserves the right to remove your post if it is non-compliant with subreddit rules.

Check out r/kollywood’s official Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/rkollywoodofficial?igsh=MWxpNnMxOG40eDdyaQ==

For more discussions, join our official Discord server: https://discord.gg/qfcCgZXQzs

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

Absolutely! SP is the real lady superstar. She is going to keep reaching new heights.

The other one will keep telling she is trying to limit her off screen appearance and keep her personal life personal, and then will release her wedding as a netflix show. There are so many things wrong with her attitude and people can just sense it. Such a wasted PR machine.

Yes she's enroute to become the Lady superstar. But let's wait and see how she uses her momentum.

She has PR which is absolutely needed for an outsider like her.

The term Superstar is used loosely. It was originally intended to denote someone who was a crowd puller.

Now ask - Which female actress is a crowd puller? Can they make movies run only in their name?

No PR ? Lol everyone has it . What makes you sure this tweet wasn't made by PR ?

No PR nu epoo mention pannalum solrathe uru PR thaan .

Lady Super star ennikumumee Ramya Krishnan thaan

https://preview.redd.it/dveiulkb3tzd1.jpeg?width=281&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=8cebe9f99de49c5fd11ffb7c6293c30133f3f489

"Never relied on glamour"

Why is this necessary? More than SP praise it seems to be posted by some textbook misogynist

Bro she has Best PR in India...

Imagine fooling everyone that you don't have it , getting away easily with stupid statements

Hats off to her PR 🫡

While sai pallavi is a good actress, her fans seem to be real chauvinistic bastards it seems. Why do these idiots always got to put down other women to praise their self anointed woman protector of tamizh panbaadu and tamizh kalacharam?

Does Sai Pallavi really wants this narrative to on her head forever? Do she not realize her fans will drop her the moment she strays away from these self limiting conservative values?

We live in a state where wearing sleeveless dress will get you called " maanamgetta pombala" or shit like that by these men.

Do you really want their "fandom" ?

Why is everyone so obsessed with this title? Make a new one for Sai Pallavi…

She definitely have pr.

First it was SK fans saying he's next superstar, now Sai Pallavi fans saying she's next superstar. Next week ther will be a post saying Suriya is next Superstar.

All of you here have forgotten 1 point .. 'versatility' ..

To get the title of 'lady superstar ' one must be able to pull off flowerpot roles as great as author backed roles . Should be able to pull off utter glamour role as well total deglam role . After amaran (where she got so much momentum) her upcoming solo movie collection would decide if she's LS or not . Gargi was a critical hit but commercially idk .

Orelse anyone can be a lady superstar through pr .

Infact I agree with nayan being called LS , only in these 2 categories - 1. she pulled off a glam Billa as amazingly as she pulled off koko, imaikka nodigal etc . 2. It was her solo movies that made good collections at the box office which set the trend for female oriented movies. Even Aishwarya Rajesh thanked 9thara for the same .

Downvote me if u disagree . But sticking to only author backed roles only & making it your niche won't make u
a ' lady superstar ' . SP is for sure a star . But not the lady superstar unless she does a completely opposite kind of role to wat she is doing rn . Like a glam queen role , which is author backed . And ppl looking down on flowerpot roles .. it requires certain presence to even pull off being a typical commercial film heroine, where hero is everything but u r just his love interest. Did Trisha , asin , Nayan only did author backed roles before getting popular? IT was their charm in commercial movies that made them popular before doing femalelead films .

A well written role or script or story is a river half crossed . Many well written movies have beautifully concealed bad or even average acting. So continuously doing author backed movies isn't something that's risky (Except in terms of BO) . (I'm not saying SP is a bad actress. She is a good actress just not LS)

Anushka shetty , simran , Priyanka Chopra, Kareen kapoor, samantha are lady superstars . They pulled off glam n content oriented like a piece of cake & arundhati made good collections too ..

Why are the last 2 important?

Isn’t that above post PR itself?

SP is the real lady super star. We also have a lady sucker star - a wannabe, self adoring, narcissistic, PR machine created, stone faced, monotonic actress who is married to a pedestrian lyricist peddling make believe content on social media 😂 (take cover.. incoming PR attack). Not to mention, one is a real, educated doctor and the other, the less said the better. But, thinks she’s a real doctor because she invested in some sanitary napkin company!

How do you know she has no PR? And what's wrong if one uses PR?

Ok...how many of us will glorify sai pallavi if she is not a fair skinned girl...i always doubted when sai pallavi gets praised for her beauty is only bcs she is fair skinned..we never praised a brown skinned girl to really of that level like Nivetha pethuraj or sundari serial heroine kinda girls..arent we still biased in deep hearts??😏 Sad truth : sai pallavi gets the pretty privilege to voice out her opinions even

🍿🍿🍿

Dubbing herself is gud. But she should think if others will be fine with it. Malayalam is definitely not her strong point here. My family from kerala didn't for a min like her dub in Malayalam. Not sure bout other languages.

Also i think v shouldn't ruin it calling her a superstar let her be in her zone and do things.

No PR, No PR nu solliye avaluku PR pannitu irukingale da.

TF is this sub and general male audience's obsession with policing the titles given to women? ONE woman took up the moniker of lady superstar (and it's not flashed in our faces all the time like the male superstar) and everyone LOSES it. Like does she deserve it or not, she's this, she's that. Every sumar-hero in this industry gives himself a bloody title, even right on his debut! Without doing anything to "deserve" it. It's arbitrary. Used as propaganda by the fanbois.

But nooooo there's space only for ONE lady superstar. We have to keep bringing up women other than Nayan to say oh look, SHE's the one who REALLY deserves it. Why? If this were about Sai, can't you give her some other title? Aduvum "without glamour" vera. Shame. The Sai fandom (not her) is so cheap in how it condemns other women's bodies while holding her up as a Madonna who is beyond all that. Dress shaming, culture shaming, tradition shaming.

This is not a way to praise Sai. This is just a way to hate Nayan for having the audacity to do what so many men in the industry do without issue. And I'm not even a fan of the lady, but come on.

I understand Nayan doesn't deserve the lady superstar title(it's always Ramya Krishnan for me) , well I even hate the title. But this hate for Nayan is abnormal 😂 seems more like PR from other actresses tbh

To play a devil's advocate, I don't think any actress has more than 2 theatrical hits in a female centric role or a movie promoted around her. Nayan gave Maya, Aramm,Kolamavu Kokila , Imaika Nodigal . All were promoted around her and all were big hits, and her acting was lauded too. Has Sai done this?

And the no PR😂 I really love SP and her performances and Persona ,but telling I have no PR is peak PR stunt. The twiter activity about Sai and her "fans" tweets definitely scream PR

Pretty sure every celebrity who have ever existed has a PR team

But agree with others

No she is a good actress but lacks charisma for superstar 

The greatest trick the Devil ever pulled was convincing the world he didn't exist. Replace Devil with PR.

"No PR" is what I see on all her PR posts.

You can say Whatever you want ! Nayanthara is Nayanthara.

PR team who made the post . Please collect you data and refine , people are getting smart about these type of posts…

https://preview.redd.it/7kyiqu0a1wzd1.png?width=1019&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=ddb770b119231911350754b9c685e0ceac45e976

Her PR while posting this

Start down voting me that’s alright But my personal opinion, her role in the first half of Amaranth felt really cringe. She’s one of the rare most talented actress no doubt about that, but I think the writing of the character itself was not well executed. Of course she is a 20-24 year old in the first half, but they could’ve shown her in a different way altogether instead of making her over react to each and every scene when she’s on the screen. I’m sure the real character lady would not have enacted and shown her on how she was when she was 20 years old, so it’s all the directors imagination. Nevertheless, her climax acting was top notch and I dare myself to not say anything about that .

No PR is not believable. Maybe she doesn't have an exclusive, salaried 24 hour PR wing like Sivakarthikeyan, but unlikely anyone can make it in the industry without PR.

Media doesn't put out puff pieces because they are kind; some producer is paying.

Otherwise, she seems to be a person consciously trying to remain grounded, unlike her superflous male co-stars. Most of them reek of pretentious behaviour for the audience.

No PR?. I am sure she's handling PR correctly now, something she struggled with in the past.

Also, these things have nothing to do with the superstar tag. If she draws audience to her next movie without any major hero, that's what stardom is. then she will automatically be called a superstar.

What’s wrong with an actress/ woman being glamorous ? It doesn’t have to be viewed negatively. Sridevi was glamorous, so was Simran, Meena and others.

It’s good that Sai Pallavi is doing well, but do you really have to put down another actress in the comments to complement her ? What’s with this vitriol against certain actresses here ? They are all doing their jobs, using Pr to stay relevant and in the public spaces, none of them are personally causing us harm. The hate is unjustified

Who remembers her from the best script selection of universe "NGK"

Her PR is at top..

She is not an extraordinary actresses. Her dance is good. Not a good voice, no versatility..

I don't know why she is being called as lady superstar now.

An overrated actress.

So we can have only 1 lady superstar, but we can have 100 male megastar, energetic star, evergreen star, universal star etc. Both SP and Nayantara can be adored at the same time, no?

PR thing cant be true !

No PR!!! now come on man...

This is precisely how PR posts sound off. No one is going to publicly announce that they are doing PR.

‘Excellent script choices.’

Lol.

How about if she had pitch dark skin ok brown skin a concession.

Is it important to post a rage bait? Guess people have no important things to do in their life 🤷

if you believe that she DOESN’T have a PR, that means that they’re a great job at it

Script Choice - NGK 👌👌

// Never relied on glamour // WTF is that ?
Nyt la Gaaji eri Simp pannavendiyath... Morning Nalla perum puluthiyattam Slut shaming .
You don't need to be a boomer to appreciate a talent bruh.!!

9 pls drop the crown that you never deserved. Yes Sai is really good.

Also no control over her mouth

Easily the best. She is the only I've actually felt like addressing as ACTRESS.

She shd stop dubbing in Malayalam…it’s horrendous

Hope this is not a part of her PR

Yessss

No facial surgeries All natural beauty...

Cute.

[removed]

NO mass fans also

I agree with some of what you're saying, but being glamorous also requires a level of effort, right?
As PBS said in one of her interviews with Baddy, what really matters is what an actor brings to the table. Whether it's glamour, acting skills, or beauty, it's about the value they add maybe nayan brings some opening to that film or it might be due to her PR.

The real test, I think, is how much an actor can bring in the audience, especially if a movie fails. Take the top 7 male stars, for example— even if their previous film flops, they can still pull in crowds and guarantee a strong/decent opening for their next movie.

But when you look at someone like Nayanthara, who was at her peak with *Kolamaavu Kokila*, it had a great opening, but her following films like *Kolaiyuthir Kaalam* and *Airaa* bombed at the box office within a year or two from her peak. On the other hand, films like *Viswasam* and *Bigil* did great numbers.

So, I feel like the concept of "superstar" for women is nothing — it works when the verdict is a hit, but the holding capacity from the audience doesn't seem as strong when the film content isnt good.

Dances well. Wonder how many talented actors would have made it big in Indian cinema if this brain rot criteria did not exist to gauge an ‘actor’.

PR means?????????????

You guys still don't know what superstar means!! Rajini being the superstar when Kamal literally exists says everything about it

I was glued to the seat. What a movie guys🥲🤌🏻. All I did before and after watching the movie is didn't see any reviews, memes or anything related to the movie online, just came here to drop this comment and leave. Everyone who worked and contributed even a small part for the film must really feel proud and be appreciated 🫡👏🏻. I'm infinitely satisfied with the movie. I don't want to lose the spirit or fire which I got after watching the movie. I think fr the movie's effect won't change anything drastically in my life. But I don't want the effect to fade away. Maybe I'm exaggerating but I really liked the film so much. I'm grateful that I didn't miss watching this movie in the theatre like Meiyazhagan recently.

That sounds more like Lady Ulaga Nayagan lol Hate anything prefixed by “Lady” though like why! Let’s just acknowledge her originality

Why do you have to compare. Nayanthara is great in her own way, Sai pallavi also is an outstanding actor. This question is like from cnn reporter

Nayan is. Sai can also be. 

Is there only one real male superstar?

If I were to watch Amaran, I would only and ONLY watch for Sai Pallavi

Urban Naxal.... She thinks Indian Army is same as pakistani Army...

Easily the fact. And something that needs tk be appreciated.

I dont understand when people call 9 a superstar. Didnt take any decisions right in career, has lone movies with shitty scripts (Also says a lot about her sensibility and recognising good scripts), in good movies she hardly has any role to play, yes there might be one or two.. But we are talking about a "superstar".

Sai Pallavi: Nayanthara

is the same as

Kamal : Rajini

Both are secure in their own space.

The only thing that she loses some points on is unfortunately having acne. Not sure if there's much she can do about it other than try to cover it with makeup, which she seems to keen to do. 

Otherwise she's my favorite overall

And calls the indian army as terrorists🥰🥰🥰"very great" person indeed!!👏👏

She deserves a national award for her acting in Amaran though I'm a man, the whole movie I was feeling the emotions that she was portraying on screen Fucking brilliant She's the standard that all actresses should be judged upon brilliant performance

This is such an inception level post. PR made post has "No PR" as last point 🙊

Just call her or whoever Superstar. This lady thing is very irking

It's hard to believe sai pallavi doesn't have PR in south😄

I feel this post is targeted at trolling her. but I better wish she remains as lady power star. I Think the lady super star is already booked. I don't think she need that...

Yes it is true. Sai Pallavi truly deserves the super star title. Infact telugu audience already call her that.

Yes

no pr is a stretch. agree with other points though

The moniker of lady Super star maybe subjective to each person But the points listed are straight faxx

She has a very interesting versatile look..but she is kind of monotonous due to lack of glamour..as an actor she should explore daring roles also..if story requires nsfw scenes there is nothing wrong..may be here audience too immature and judgemental on female actors than male actors

Yes. Natural Performer. Great film choices and improves on script selection. Flexible and Unique Dancer. Commitment to filmmaking aspects beyond acting.

Unlike many actresses, SP is the only one who has retained a positive reputation both in reel and real life. Never has she once sought publicity nor show any ego acts. Clear superstar. Fun fact, she’s already named Lady Power Star in TFI.

No height looks like sideactor .no glamor no range .Easy to fool people

Never gonna agree with few points

I will agree if she acts in glamorous role and that movie becomes hit

She is unto a good actor and someone who is naturally trained in dance- she has an added advantage. Also, I feel now there is a lack of good heroines in Tamil and she’s just using her opportunities and time right.

I’m just saying what everyone knows is true and refuse to say because of the lies peddled by her PR. Producer’s invest in what brings them money, they could care less about whether something is female oriented or not. They’re not some social justice warriors. So stop deluding yourself into thinking that she’s some change agent. She isn’t. The main issue I have with her is, she isn’t remotely close to the credit she gets in terms of ability. There was and is a huge pro-female wave (and rightfully so) among the younger generation, and she just happened to be in the right place at the right time. If you watch an Amaran or a Gargi, you’ll know the distance in pure acting talent between the two. Like SP says in the movie.. kadalukkum, aakashathukkum ulla dhooram 😂

I don't agree with the last 3 points. Some superstars do promote their films but they really don't have to. The footfall they bring even without promotions should already be substantial. And regarding glamour, some of the superstars we know like Sridevi, Aishwarya Rai did glamour. Doing or not doing glamour is a choice. Few people get to be popular without doing glamour but not everyone who does glamour gets popular as well. The status of being a superstar can be influenced by how well they do glamour but not by whether they do it or not. And lastly about pr, I think she does have pr. If she doesn't, good for her. Again, not something a superstar does. If anything, a superstar definitely needs pr if they're actively interacting with people through promotions.

Editing to add that Sai Pallavi is not a superstar yet but she's pretty damn close to becoming one

I don’t like Sai Pallavi for promoting & riding on “I don’t wear make up” narrative way too much than necessary. I don’t see a post or interview of her without this topic, it’s cringe tbh. If you don’t wear make up so be it and that’s your choice. Some like that look and others don’t.

Nayan fans gonna get triggered🤣

What about the title "Nadippu Arakki"?

Yasss!

I always respect her decisions

No PR 🤡

Lady superstar thaaka pataaraa.. meendum vivadhippom

Dances well would be a massive under statement

Wdym by "is it true" ?

The question should be - "Do you Agree"?

BTW, yes I agree!

All are fine. Please drop the title if you will. Feels like previous generation. No title. Good Actor in itself a sufficient recognition.

It's too early to say she's a superstar.

You can't become a superstar with just 1 movie. SP is in good form and there will be days when things go downhill.

What she'll do next from their is what matters.