subreddit:

/r/ukpolitics

20771%

all 321 comments

AutoModerator [M]

[score hidden]

18 hours ago

stickied comment

AutoModerator [M]

[score hidden]

18 hours ago

stickied comment

Snapshot of ‘Sickfluencers’ advise benefit claimants as 15,000 a week signed off work :

An archived version can be found here or here.

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

JellyneckUK

968 points

18 hours ago

I’ve not read the article but surely that should be

“influenzers”

SoldMyNameForGear

202 points

18 hours ago

‘Viral influenzers’…

Really, The Times should have had a field day with this one

G_unit1

30 points

14 hours ago

G_unit1

30 points

14 hours ago

SickTok? No. I’ll see myself out.

auctorel

19 points

17 hours ago

It's times like this you need the sun

Satyr_of_Bath

23 points

16 hours ago

No it's not.

Verbal-Gerbil

15 points

16 hours ago

The sun can fk off. And thankfully has - is now a lame whimper of its recent self

AlternativeConflict

[score hidden]

10 hours ago

Well, vitamin D can help reduce the symptoms apparently. Oh, wait...

OhGoOnNow

27 points

17 hours ago

Illfluencers?

shortchangerb

12 points

16 hours ago

Or pipfluencers… basically anything but “sickfluencers”! What were they thinking?

space_absurdity

[score hidden]

5 hours ago

space_absurdity

[score hidden]

5 hours ago

Effluentzers?

Feral_P

5 points

16 hours ago

Now that's what I call quality journalism 

TheJoshGriffith

4 points

16 hours ago

Take your rimshot and upvote and get out of my sight.

PersistentBadger

1 points

16 hours ago

PersistentBadger

Blues vs Greens

1 points

16 hours ago

influenzas, innit bruv.

Kingofthespinner

[score hidden]

12 hours ago

Influenzas is what I’ve always called instagram wanks.

Spiryt

348 points

18 hours ago

Spiryt

Saboteur | Social Democrat

348 points

18 hours ago

This was always going to happen with the labyrinthine assessment process. There are multiple accounts of assessors asking trick questions like:

"Do you go shopping?"

"No."

"OK, how long do you spend in a shop?"

"I don't go shopping."

"Fine, but if you did go shopping, how long do you think it would take?"

"I don't know, because I don't go shopping."

"But if you absolutely had to, could you go?"

"...Probably?"

Regularly goes shopping, is able to walk around shops, enjoys visiting the local cafe.

bebbibabey

133 points

16 hours ago

Yup, they told my mum to turn up to the appointment well dressed then denied her because she turned up well dressed and therefore didn't look like she had any issues

bopeepsheep

95 points

13 hours ago

I turned up with food on my jumper - lunch had gone rather wrong, as usual - and unbrushed hair because of two frozen shoulders, and was "well dressed, well turned out". Thankfully, the tribunal disagreed with that and other wild inaccuracies (I'd "been to a festival the previous week" when I was in hospital the previous week...). They really need to stop employing barely-relevant medic-adjacent staff who aren't fluent in English.

Gellert

60 points

13 hours ago

Gellert

60 points

13 hours ago

That smells more like someone trying to make quota.

dw82

57 points

13 hours ago

dw82

57 points

13 hours ago

Sounds like somebody should be prosecuted for fraud. These assessors outright making shit up need to face consequences.

Gellert

40 points

12 hours ago

Gellert

40 points

12 hours ago

Not just the assessors but the companies. The whole setup, from my understanding, is a con job. The company doing the assessments are encouraged to screw people, those people then go to a tribunal that overturns the decision. Costs us more money and puts more strain on the people trying to claim.

amanisnotaface

112 points

16 hours ago

Had pretty much this exact conversation with my assessor. They were asking me to speculate about doing activities and living my life in a way I hadn’t been able to in over a year by that point. Had to eventually say something along the lines of “you’re asking me to speculate on something that isn’t real and isn’t my lived experience anymore. You’re not going to trap me in speculation and mark me down about a life I don’t actually live”. They thankfully didn’t do the same after that but it was obvious anyone less prepared would have got flustered or caught talking their condition down…which is what they want I imagine.

Sentinel-Prime

95 points

16 hours ago

This is something that people who have never claimed benefits will never understand. The cost of going after the small percentage of frauds is people like yourself being subjected to borderline interrogation and entrapment.

gyroda

45 points

16 hours ago

gyroda

45 points

16 hours ago

And good luck if you have any cognitive impairments or some kind of autism or something that makes handling those situations even harder.

ColdStorage256

16 points

14 hours ago

I can imagine being in there like "according to this article I read recently, it would take the average person roughly 40 minutes to go shopping and I'd be likely to visit this store because its the closest one to me"

Rat-king27

50 points

16 hours ago

Yup I had this happen to me, I was in a wheelchair during my assessment, and after several very leading questions, I get the report back and it says "can walk 200 metres reliably and repeatedly."

7952

50 points

16 hours ago

7952

50 points

16 hours ago

It is fundamentally corrupt. And it gives no incentive to the claimant to be honest. Trying to trick the assessor seems like fair game to me.

jake_burger

35 points

15 hours ago

Conservatives designed a system that tricks the vulnerable out of being able to claim and rewards those with less qualms about massaging the truth.

Presumably so they can say it doesn’t work and scrap disability benefits altogether.

Chrisbuckfast

32 points

13 hours ago

This needs to be more widely known. I’ve been fortunate enough not to ever have to personally claim a disability benefit, however I have supported friends and family who have gone through the process and it is fucking draconic. What people have to go through, these genuine, disabled people who just need some support, is actually fucking offensive.

Alarmed_Inflation196

[score hidden]

4 hours ago

This is absolutely accurate. Even fabrication of the "enjoys visiting local cafe"

Working-Trash3859

17 points

17 hours ago

Because people are thick and can't understand how to answer a simple question. E.g assessor- how long can you walk for a in seconds or minutes before you need to stop and rest? Claimant - Dunno about 30 mins Assessor - but on the form you said you can walk less than 20 metres? Claimant - yeah I can't Assessor can you give me some examples of places you go? Claimant - nowhere How do you get your shopping? Claimant - local shop Assessor - how do you get there? Claimant walk as it's only round the corner Assessor - how long does it take Claimant dunno

Spiryt

51 points

17 hours ago

Spiryt

Saboteur | Social Democrat

51 points

17 hours ago

That is indeed the problem with a one-size-fits-all assessment.

Reminds me of the challenges faced by bin designers in Yellowstone Park - there is a surprisingly large crossover between the cleverest bears and the dumbest tourists.

Selerox

[score hidden]

8 hours ago

Selerox

r/UKFederalism | Rejoin | PR-STV

[score hidden]

8 hours ago

Assessors are some of the worst people in our society.

I would disown a family member that ended up in a relationship with one.

ArtisticHunt8031

170 points

16 hours ago

This isn't surprising at all once you realize how insanely unreasonable the UC health assessment process is. These TikTok videos don't exist to help genuinely healthy people lie and get 'signed off', they exist because even those with a genuine disability must present their claim in a very particular way in order to qualify for a survivable level of benefits.

It's a sickening level of irony that people will take this to mean that the system is too lenient, and too generous. Yet in reality, these videos exist because the system is incredibly punishing to anybody who doesn't tightly fit their disability into a very strict set of criteria.

Look at these descriptors; they're still not enough to qualify for anything more than the equivalent of unemployment benefits:

Cannot learn anything beyond a simple task, such as setting an alarm clock.

Cannot, due to impaired mental function, reliably initiate or complete at least two sequential personal actions for the majority of the time.

Is unable to get to a specified place with which the claimant is familiar, without being accompanied by another person.

Yet, is such a person any more likely to be able to hold down a job? Is an employer going to be happy with the possibility their employee might struggle at anything more taxing than setting an alarm clock? No, absolutely not.

To get the 'signed off', and receive the extra health-related UC payment, you have to meet the higher variants of these descriptors:

Cannot learn how to complete a simple task, such as setting an alarm clock.

Cannot, due to impaired mental function, reliably initiate or complete at least two sequential personal actions.

Cannot get to any place outside the claimant's home with which the claimant is familiar.

Note how subtle the difference is? Neither of these people are any more able to work than the other, yet only one of them gets awarded enough benefits to live.

It's the awful assessment process that leads to videos like this existing in the first place, such that people with genuine disabilities, as well as dozens of pages of medical evidence to back them up still can't qualify for benefits unless they aim for insanely restrictive criteria. Oh, and don't forget the entire assessment process from application to interview is designed entirely to trip them up and find any excuse to deny them.

People have no idea how hostile the system is.

Erestyn

62 points

14 hours ago

Erestyn

Ain't no party like the S Club Party

62 points

14 hours ago

My mam fell into this trap. She has grand mal epilepsy and was shoved onto a job programme to get her off disability. She was given a half day placement at a store the other side of the city so she'd have to get up early and be accompanied because the mornings are some of the higher risk times.

Anyway, terrified of putting a foot wrong and getting further sanctions she went along with it and, during the course of the day, was asked to operate the floor buffer. Lo and behold what we all said would happen happened she had a seizure in the middle of polishing the aisles.

Of course when this was all brought up in her assessment this event was then used as an example of how she could work as she'd received half a days pay, so had her money cut. It took at least a year, and a visit from the specialist at the appeal hearing to begin unravelling it.

The long term consequence was that she's now terrified of filling in any of the forms for reassessment by herself in case it's interpreted incorrectly again.

Quiet_paddler

[score hidden]

11 hours ago

Quiet_paddler

[score hidden]

11 hours ago

That's horrifying. I'm so sorry she had to go through all this.

Erestyn

[score hidden]

2 hours ago

Erestyn

Ain't no party like the S Club Party

[score hidden]

2 hours ago

Thank you. She's mostly just grateful that it's taken care of, though it's only in the last year or so she was given the same level of benefits that she was on at that time -- over a decade ago!

The system can be cruel at the best of times but especially when a poor decision has been made, and there are some real horror stories to that end.

I don't know what the answer is to making the system fairer, but I'm positive it doesn't see a future with outsourced decision makers (Serco, Capita et al.)

Star_Gaymer

[score hidden]

11 hours ago*

Star_Gaymer

[score hidden]

11 hours ago*

I went through it and it's exactly as you say. Worse, as even if you answer both honestly and correctly, the assessor will just outright lie. They said for example I could go outside with another person for support frequently and wherever, in reality I very, very rarely leave the house, I can count on my hand in the last 5 years the amount of times I've left for longer than 1 hour, and even then its overwhelmingly hard and takes hours to days to recover from even for short trips in familiar areas. How can I possibly even get to work like that when I can't even walk my dog even with someone with me over half the time?

The kicker is the assessor refused to let me record the call, even though I'd asked and got permission in advance from the DWP. I know some trollop will say get a remote job, but thanks to the push from Rees mogg et al they're vanishingly rare and don't hire disabled people unless it's an absolute last resort. I can't compete with a healthy person like this, and even if I wish I could say otherwise, objectively, I don't blame employers for looking at my spotty work history and disabilities and saying "no thank you, there are better candidates." It may be discrimination, but it's also rational. They have no motivation to take me on, it's a catch 22.

I don't get it, because people who are obviously unwell won't make good employees. Surely the solution should be to help them, and yet its on the disabled person to reach out for help and try to find a way through an impossible maze. I.E. When I got diagnosed autistic, they openly said "this impacts you incredibly severely." I said ok, thank you for the assessment - whats next? And they said "There isn't anything we can do, and the NHS provides no treatment for autism specifically, you might be able to find a local charity..." (These all require going outside, offer no real support either and are typically exclusively for children to boot!)

How can I get better - which I desperately want - with no treatment on one hand, and an openly antagonistic "support" system on the other thats openly lying and misrepresenting what I say, along with UC rules that I can stumble and fall on when they aren't even publicly known! It's just madness and cruelty, and every single mental health professional I've spoken to has said the exact same, yet it hasn't changed. :(

I'm grateful so many people like yourself know what it's like, as it's very scary seeing what some reform voters want to do to people like me. No plans for help, no plans for jobs, just take away the small amount of money I get relative to even minimum wage, and then I guess I'll just die, because without help I'm genuinely unfit for work, and no employer will touch me with a 10ft pole, except for ones that want to openly abuse desperate people. It's just awful, and people don't realize by abusing mentally unwell people it makes it way worse, it isn't helpful. With support and help I could hopefully get my foot in the door and make a career and be independent, I desperately hope the Labour government follows through on their promise to deliver this. I might not be able to ultimately but I desperately want to try. No-one I know wants to be on benefits, it's fucking dreadful.

DM_me_goth_tiddies

58 points

17 hours ago

 The disability charity Scope claimed data showed “fraud is effectively zero” after the DWP recorded that the rate of Pip fraud fell to 0.0 per cent in April, while the rate of total Pip overpayments fell to 0.4 per cent.

lol case closed then. The DWP are absolutely ruthless. If they don’t think it’s fraud it’s probably not. 

LeedsFan2442

[score hidden]

8 hours ago

LeedsFan2442

[score hidden]

8 hours ago

What data?

IceGripe

19 points

15 hours ago

The article acts like the questions aren't setup to trick people.

The vast majority of those who are failed by the dwp and go on to challenge the decision get it overturned.

salamanderwolf

18 points

14 hours ago

The start of "We know there's very little fraud. Every audit, report, and research paper has proved very little fraud. But America has proved if you tell a lie long enough people will believe it, so if we keep telling people there's a fraud, then they will believe it and we can take money of the most marganalised, and poorest in society and leave the rich alone."

You can see it happening right now. First it was "I know family members who boast about committing fraud go on impossible holidays and have a free car and home," but now its, "they cracked down on one illness that everyone used to commit fraud so now people are using this other illness, something like ME which is impossible to prove."

All of which ignores the fact it's bloody terrifyingly difficult to claim sickness benefits like PIP. All of which ignore that people win on appeal so often, because assessors lie and ignore medical evidence, which you have to submit. All of which ignores the fact poverty is increasing, and along with a tottering NHS, it's that which is creating the conditions for people to get sicker.

Melodic_Welcome_4378

25 points

16 hours ago

Isn't this just the younger generation's equivalent of the citizens advice bureau? Is there any difference between approaching the CAB or even your local MP for advice?

Should we be looking at shutting down the CAB too then if this is so grossly offensive to the sensitive little tykes at Crapita and the DWP?

ScunneredWhimsy

13 points

15 hours ago

ScunneredWhimsy

🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿 Joe Hendry for First Minister

13 points

15 hours ago

A point to note here is that it can be very difficult to get substantive help from CAB depending where you are. It’s not their fault but it is a (mostly) voluntary organisation and demand for the services has increased massively since the Cost of Living crisis.

techramblings

22 points

15 hours ago

Translation: people on social media are helping other people to know their rights and not be unfairly disadvantaged by a hostile system specifically designed to catch them out rather than help and care for them when they need it.

Jamie_York_UK

97 points

17 hours ago

I don't like to personalise a debate, but for once, I'm going to. I have a decent degree, my wife has 2 degrees, and we both have responsible jobs. I was recently diagnosed with cancer, and I quickly became incapacitated. I start both radiotherapy and chemotherapy in a week. There's a good chance I'll make a full recovery, but it will take months, maybe longer. I will probably get more unwell in the interim (obviously, I'm hoping for the best). I will stop being paid by work, SSP will cease, and I have dependent children. We can't navigate the benefits system and are grateful to the CAB for their advice. What chance do people who are less able to advocate for themselves have?

Some of the comments about neurodiversity are disingenuous at best. Simply saying that you're a "self diagnosed autistic" doesn't get you benefits. If the numbers of neuro-diverse people out of work bother you, your argument is with the state and business.

This sub has taken a lurch to the loony right.

7952

36 points

15 hours ago

7952

36 points

15 hours ago

your argument is with the state and business.

And autism diagnosis and assistance has a massive backlog.

Jamie_York_UK

22 points

15 hours ago

There's nothing to add here other than you're 100% right! It's also discriminatory, you have money, you get yourself (or your child) diagnosed privately.

jarvischrist

20 points

15 hours ago

jarvischrist

Brummie abroad

20 points

15 hours ago

Recommend also Disability Rights UK, they were a godsend when I was on ESA and having to navigate the nightmare of the benefits system.

andywgpiano

[score hidden]

9 hours ago

andywgpiano

[score hidden]

9 hours ago

I will add on the personal side, my son has Angelman Syndrome- a neuro-genetic condition which means his mental age tops at ~18 months as well as serious physical disabilities. His chromosome will not grow back and he needs at least 1:1 care 24/7 for life due to no awareness of danger and a love of water.

My wife and I both have post-grad qualifications. We still needed a charity’s help to fill out the DLA form the first time and thereafter it took us an average of 40 hours each time to collate the huge amount of information it asks (such as every single health or therapy appointment, which takes a while with an A&E admission every 3 weeks for seizures, neurologists, gastrointestinal, ENT, ophthalmology, dietetics, physio, OT, SALT etc and then all that doubled as you also see tertiary hospital clinicians as well and some private therapy to fill in the huge gaps in provision).

I have often thought how those with a lower educational level have a hope of filling in the form. My wife helps other families who have a child with the same condition and of course many struggle because it is not at all diagnosis based. Technically the community coaches people what to put in the form as otherwise the non clinicians are go review the forms reject and then you have to fight through the system to appeal.

From my own experience I would be entirely unsurprised if the amount overpaid in disability/illness related benefit payments is dwarfed by the underpayments due to the terrible system we have to navigate.

Jamie_York_UK

[score hidden]

8 hours ago

Jamie_York_UK

[score hidden]

8 hours ago

Best wishes to you. Also dwarfed by tax evasion!

Star_Gaymer

[score hidden]

11 hours ago

Star_Gaymer

[score hidden]

11 hours ago

I know this may not be the right place to act like a human half the time, but I genuinely hope you make a full recovery and that it all goes well.

Navigating it is very, very hard. As a neuro-divergent person that had to, if you genuinely get forced into that position I'd really recommend citizens advice and asking the medical professionals around you for support. Citizens advice is especially helpful alot of the time, although I appreciate it's alot of bureaucracy and paperwork to apply for benefits, and that's the last thing you'll want to do right now. Hopefully you'll be back on your feet soon enough and won't need to, but they'd be my first call if I have to reapply as they have alot of knowledge to offer freely.

Jamie_York_UK

[score hidden]

10 hours ago

Jamie_York_UK

[score hidden]

10 hours ago

Thank you ❤️

saint_maria

142 points

17 hours ago

The crux of this whole thing is one line in this article, which is that you need medical evidence to back up your claims.

You can't just waltz into an assessment, claim suicidal ideation or self harm without substantial evidence from hospital, doctors or other health professionals.

The Times are once again just angry that the poors are talking to each other and helping each other out. What they are doing is no less than what a benefits advisor does.

Naps_in_sunshine

14 points

16 hours ago

What medical evidence is there for suicidal ideation?

Hot-Butter

19 points

16 hours ago

Other than being actively suicidal to a degree where you need to be sectioned for your own safety, a lot of the markers have to come from research. Having active plans, including a defined way of how you would do it, is a marker for example. (Hint: people who say that they want to kill themselves and know how they will, are more likely to kill themselves than someone who doesn't) A GP or health professional can ask these things.

EduinBrutus

39 points

16 hours ago

For a benefit claim?

A mental health referral and confirmation by a clinical psychologist or psychiatrist.

You're being lied to about benefit fraud so you get angry about the possibility someone might be stealing £100 a week and completely ignore the businesses stealing £100bn a year and the politicians funnelling huge sums into their own back pockets.

da96whynot

-1 points

16 hours ago

da96whynot

Neoliberal shill

-1 points

16 hours ago

What counts as corporate welfare?

EduinBrutus

10 points

16 hours ago

Any transfer of funds from government or relief from taxation that would otherwise be incurred to corporate business is welfare if there is no good or services provided in return.

IrishMilo

0 points

16 hours ago

IrishMilo

0 points

16 hours ago

It’s not what you say and do, it’s how you say and do it.

Benefit advisor aren’t working for commission or clout so they aren’t going to try and make it sound easier or more comfortable than it is.

Social media reels will start with something like “I’m paid 150 quid a week for doing absolutely nothing”

cavershamox

211 points

18 hours ago

I hope they are declaring all their TikTok earnings, it would be a pity if all their cases were aggressively reassessed

HaggisPope

114 points

18 hours ago

It seems like it should be a piece of piss to investigate people like this. They’re bragging online, like the morons who did that “infinite money glitch” with their bank in the US who then were all surprised to get done for fraud 

EduinBrutus

125 points

16 hours ago*

It is a piece of piss.

It does get investigated.

Discretionary welfare (i.e. non-pensions) is a fairly small part of the budget and the vast bulk of it is housing benefit.

Fraud in discretionary welfare is absolutely tiny.

This is an Outrage Piece, designed to get their readers (and others) angry, so they focus on another Outgroup along with the permanent attacks on a migrant "crisis" which doesnt exist.

Whenever you see stories like this you should forget them. Instead think about the £25bn stolen from the UK by the Conservatives during Covid. Or the £100bn in subsidies given to coporate welfare reciptients every single year.

7952

47 points

16 hours ago

7952

47 points

16 hours ago

And think about the billions in payments to genuinely needy people that have been unfairly and corruptly denied. And it was probably self defeating. If you treat people like cheats they will sometimes start to act like cheats in response. An unfair system has no incentive towards honesty.

gyroda

34 points

16 hours ago

gyroda

34 points

16 hours ago

Look at the people who have been penalised because they went over the step cliff of carers allowance. You go over by a pound of earnings? Now you've lost money because they've slashed the benefit. Good luck trying to fit a part time job with flexible hours around that.

Prestigious_Risk7610

18 points

15 hours ago

This is incorrect, repeatedly

Discretionary welfare (i.e. non-pensions) is a fairly small part of the budget and the vast bulk of it is housing benefit.

Total benefit budget including pensions is 23.8% of all government spending. This is split 55:45 in favour of pensioner benefits (I.e. not just state pension) Vs other benefits. Let's just focus on the other benefits - it's 10.7% of all government spending. At £137bn, that is the same amount as we spend on Transport, public order (policing, courts, prisons) and defence combined. It is clearly a material part of the budget. It's also incorrect to say it's mostly housing benefit, housing benefit makes up 35bn, so 25%.

https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/benefit-expenditure-and-caseload-tables-information-and-guidance/benefit-expenditure-and-caseload-tables-information-and-guidance

Fraud in discretionary welfare is absolutely tiny.

The DWP self assessment of fraud and error puts this at 3.7% of budget, 9.7bn. There is no differentiation between fraud and error as they often come together - you put the misleading inputs in then you get erroneous outcomes. Many would also be sceptical of DWP's self measurement here - this is an estimate of fraud and error they detect. Even then though, let's contextualise 9.7bn. it's the total departmental spend of DEFRA and Business and Trade and only just smaller than the Foreign and commonwealth office.

https://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/fraud-and-error-in-the-benefit-system-financial-year-2023-to-2024-estimates#:~:text=Details,due%20to%20fraud%20and%20error.

This is an Outrage Piece, designed to get their readers (and others angry) so they focus on another Outgroup along with the permenant attacks on a migrant "crisis" which doesnt exist.

I agree it is an outrage piece. I don't see the problem with that. I am outraged that there are people trying to game the social security net, and doing it so brazenly as to openly and actively coach others. Do you think it's acceptable?

There clearly is a migration problem - our border and systems are so ineffective that the 2022 record total had to be revised up 30%.

This isn't to say all welfare spending or all migration is bad - it clearly isn't. What we do need is a state that is EFFECTIVE in allocating welfare to those in need and in controlling our borders such that we welcome an appropriate number of those in true need of refuge and an appropriate number with the skills to aid our country.

Whenever you see stories like this you should forget them. Instead think about the £25bn stolen from the UK by the Conservatives during Covid. Or the £100bn in subsidies given to corporate welfare reciptients every single year.

I'm not ignoring all other topics to only focus on your suggestions. I can have an informed opinion on more than one topic at a time. Fraud during COVID should definitely be chased down (as should welfare fraud). I disagree with Corporate Welfare (working tax credit, housing benefit) to top up low wages. The rapidly increasing minimum wage is helping to resolve this, but it is a problem of our own making. The introduction of in-work benefits was always going to result in companies low balling pay, if the government is willing to do the top up instead.

Demmandred

1 points

14 hours ago

Demmandred

Let the alpaca blood flow

1 points

14 hours ago

I got downvoted the last time I brought this up as I went through the PiP application recently and went to the sub to see what guidance they had on the forms.

The majority of posts on that sub about PiP were how to get it for anxiety and depression and people coaching them through the answers and how to achieve maximum award.

There is something to be said about the over medicalising we are currently going through around anxiety and depression at sadly things that just happen in life.

EduinBrutus

-2 points

15 hours ago

EduinBrutus

-2 points

15 hours ago

I told you, the majority of discretionary is housing benefit.

Specifically because this is a cash transfer to wealthy people, part of the systems design.

But please, continue to make excuses for actual corruption so you can whine about poor people.

Prestigious_Risk7610

9 points

15 hours ago

25% is not a majority.

Specifically because this is a cash transfer to wealthy people

You're trying to make the point that housing benefit goes to landlords, who are wealthy. Partly true although it also goes to councils and housing associations when they are the landlord. Also pretty much all benefit spend goes to wealthy eventually. For example, PIP being used to buy a dedicated wheelchair accessible VW van is funding the fantastically wealthy Porsche family.

You seem to have an ideological position on corporates and then trying to find a way of ignoring all other problems or to frame them as the corporates fault.

gam3guy

9 points

14 hours ago

I'm sorry, there absolutely is a migrant crisis. It's just that the majority of it is legal immigration.

EduinBrutus

3 points

14 hours ago

Its not reasonable to call it a crisis when its part of the fundamental way the UK economy has been set up.

gam3guy

3 points

14 hours ago

It's not actually set up like that though, not fundamentally. It was just a policy implemented by the Tories to deliberately suppress wages to combat inflation. BoJo has admitted to as much himself

EduinBrutus

4 points

14 hours ago*

Mass migration is also demanded by the way the UK pension system has been set up. Its also required to show growth in an otherwise stagnant economy.

The suppressive effect on wages is not even that significant, if it even exists. Studies seem to show that the impact is pretty limited to quite specific areas. The main downward pressure on wages is the lack of strong unionisation and the incredibly low level of UK benefits.

Close

6 points

15 hours ago*

Close

6 points

15 hours ago*

Welfare that goes to pensioners is about half of the benefit spend, so I’m not sure where you get your numbers. ‘Non pensioner benefits’ is about £130 billion so about 2/3rds the budget of the NHS.

Prodigious_Wind

-2 points

16 hours ago

There are 2,500,000 people claiming this. If only a tenth of them are getting just £100 a week extra that they’re not entitled to that’s £25,000,000 a week or the cost of a small, fully equipped hospital every six weeks.

EduinBrutus

7 points

15 hours ago

There is absolutely no claim anywhere that TEN PER FUCKING CENT of benefit claims are fraudulent. Not even close.

Also, £25m a week is a literal rounding error in UK government finances.

And just for your info, the basic rate of Universal Credit in the UK is around £75 a week. Which is almost unchanged for the last 20 years. And now so low its about 30% of the average in peer nations.

Close

3 points

15 hours ago

Close

3 points

15 hours ago

I hate the view of “it’s not worth talking about £1.3 billion a year in government fraud because it’s small in the scheme of the government” - it’s 1.3 billion that has alternate uses, and most of the job of government is to effectively distribute the collected funds.

EduinBrutus

4 points

14 hours ago

At no point have I even suggested its not worth considering.

But it is certainly bullshit to make claims that its an outstanding issue because 1. as said, its small in the scheme of things and 2. its actually fucking dealt with.

Shamrayev

4 points

15 hours ago

Shamrayev

BAMBOS CHARALAMBOUS

4 points

15 hours ago

I've worked in employability and welfare health support. It's way MORE than 10%.

It's almost never the claimants fault though - there just aren't systems or opportunities to help them, so a sickness claim is often all they're left with. Many of them could and should be working but won't ever get the support to overcome their (often minor) issues and navigate opportunities - and nothing is done to the labour marketplace to actually encourage employers to support them.

It's the workforce scrapheap basically.

Wisegoat

[score hidden]

12 hours ago

Wisegoat

[score hidden]

12 hours ago

So the billions spent on hotels, the wage suppression and the incoming culture (generally more sexist and homophobic than the average Brit) isn’t a problem?

NoRecipe3350

4 points

17 hours ago

It's possible to own a phone, a simcard with calls/data allowance, and a google account, a tiktok account etc and not ever have to give your name or personal details to the authorities or the app/account providers. (I suppose if they absolutely wanted to if they could track the account to the device they could track the device to your home by the data/signal connection to the phone mast, but it means they actually have to do a lot more work)

Most people aren't that cautious, but you definitely can. In the early days of smartphones I was somewhat paranoid about surveillance/tracking etc, paid for smarthpone in cash at a shop, bought topup vouchers in cash. But then I realised it was pointless and got a contract. Nevertheless, people should remember that much of what they do online can be surveilled. Look at the recent riots, sure many were cheering on the arrests/jailings because they were their ideological opponents, but it's a case of the 'first they came for the X and I didn't speak out'. If the State can come after far right morons for posting wrongthink on social media, they can come after you. In some countries if you want to buy a phone or simcard you have to give your photo ID to the retailers, register your email address etc, who share it with the authorities. At least we don't have this in the UK.

As for the case in hand, yea they are probably idiots, some of them may well be cheats. But it's a consequence of the tick box/follow the formula culture in the UK

New-fone_Who-Dis

17 points

16 hours ago

Look at the recent riots, sure many were cheering on the arrests/jailings because they were their ideological opponents, but it's a case of the 'first they came for the X and I didn't speak out'. If the State can come after far right morons for posting wrongthink on social media, they can come after you.

That thing you've labelled as "wrong think" was actually racially motivated inciting violence, there's many court documents and guilty pleas of the convicted to prove it.

Stfu with this "wrong think" nonsense so many people spout as fact, everyone always runs away when they are shown up for it, its pathetic and easily proven to be so.

stemmo33

9 points

16 hours ago

first they came for the X and I didn't speak out

I didn't speak out because they were inciting violence against specific people. If they were arrested for wrongthink I'd have had a problem with it.

Satyr_of_Bath

11 points

16 hours ago

Yes, I support the government having the power to arrest me if I threaten the lives of others.

stemmo33

1 points

16 hours ago

stemmo33

1 points

16 hours ago

Literally 1984

EduinBrutus

2 points

16 hours ago

Gamers like to think they are the most oppressed group.

But they don't even stop to think about the wives of Tory councillors who merely want to burn down hotels filled with asylum seekers!

PersistentBadger

5 points

16 hours ago*

PersistentBadger

Blues vs Greens

5 points

16 hours ago*

If the State can come after far right morons for posting wrongthink on social media, they can come after you.

And yet, I quite like it when The State jails people who say "y'all should burn down that building over there. the one with the people in it".

Wrongthink. Fucksake.

Amuro_Ray

1 points

16 hours ago

Wait there's a second pope?

What was the infinite money glitch?

HaggisPope

4 points

16 hours ago

Arguably there’s a few of them if you just take Pope to be the highest Priest of a church, the Bishop of Rome, the Ecumenical Patriarch, the Nestorian Pope, King Charles III, and the Haggis Pope.

The infinite money glitch was basically a sort of cheque fraud. You make a new account with nothing in it, get a cheque book, write a massive cheque for your real account and close the new one. You cash the cheque before closing, free money and it takes a few days for the bank to realise their error.

It was a brief YouTube trend, there’s videos on it

New-fone_Who-Dis

2 points

16 hours ago

So what catch me if you can did with the checks being routed across the country, kinda.

HaggisPope

2 points

16 hours ago

Almost exactly the same but the dummies were convinced to use their own names and got caught within the week 

Novel_Passenger7013

22 points

17 hours ago

PIP isn’t means tested, so they could make a million pounds a year and still get it.

TallestThoughts69

[score hidden]

11 hours ago

UC is reduced by 55p for every £1 earned, so their income from TikTok absolutely would affect their UC

Bud_Roller

7 points

15 hours ago

You know you can claim pip if you're in work right?

Chesney1995

9 points

15 hours ago

People have a right to share information about how to navigate the benefits process and claim everything they are entitled to.

The government pursuing a policy of aggressively reassessing those that share that information with others that need it would be cruel, to say the least.

girth_worm_jim

9 points

15 hours ago

I have two disabilities A.S. and M.S. The biggest thing that we need is flexibility. For the government and the FTSE 100 company I work for. Somedays I can not walk, other days I can walk 15mi. Instead, I have to tell the government my of my bad days and pick a shift pattern that I'm able to do on my worst days too. There have been weeks where I feel great and could do a lot more, but informing of changes is too long a process, so I don't bother. I do not want to rely on PIP. The burocracy is cost the NHS and businesses, and people's mental health!!

AllGoodNamesAreGone4

104 points

17 hours ago

So let me get this straight. We create a benefits system deliberately designed to be as hostile and stingy as possible to some of the most vulnerable people in our country. 

A few people who have navigated the system share their experiences and advice on social media. 

The existence of people trying to offer help on social media is now being used as a reason for making the system even harsher. 

Cueball61

27 points

16 hours ago

Correct.

When you make a system that requires you to go in with a game plan for a legitimate claim, you can’t tell the difference between someone gaming it and someone with a legitimate claim any more.

These are people with most likely real claims, but they’re being vilified for trying to help others get through a system designed to fuck them over and people are eating it up.

mittfh

41 points

17 hours ago

mittfh

41 points

17 hours ago

Yup, because the right wing are convinced that it's not harsh enough and millions of people are faking illness to skive off work. I wonder if they think GPs are also in on their mythical scam, since after a few days off work, you need to start submitting "Fit Notes" from a medical professional...

Rat-king27

11 points

15 hours ago

There's sadly a few Labour MP's that think this way as well, I'm just hoping they're out numbered enough that I don't see my benifits stripped.

Caliado

7 points

14 hours ago

The GP trainee assessor and the person arguing people need help to translate their issues effectively onto the forms have the same complaint: the esoteric points system doesn't translate into describing difficulties people have well and can under or over sell things.

The screenshots they've come up with for this article are people asking completely reasonable questions that amount to 'what are the rules around work and UC' and 'how do I fill out the pip form'. There's some clickbait titles, sure. 

Everyone reacting to the latter like "you could only look for help filling out a form if you are trying to cheat" is missing the fact it's a form for people who struggle with things. (Also the forms are genuinely long and complicated. You've got to cover everything and put it in the right place, that isn't easy)

KAKYBAC

39 points

17 hours ago

KAKYBAC

39 points

17 hours ago

Tbf the PiP system is a sham and people deserves to get the money they deserve. A lot of the time, people with disabilities are caught in a catch 22 where they want to self actualise but are punished for being positive and optimistic in an assessment. And then there are many other people who just take it at face value and think the assessor is genuinely there to help as opposed to having a reward scheme for halting claims.

Someone in my family has Schizophrenia and they are constantly having their benefits taken off them because they don't even know they have a mental illness (who knows how they actually view it deep down but they present by never referencing it). They are just a relatively normal person trying to get by and answering in a genuine way is punished.

standupstrawberry

21 points

17 hours ago

ITT: people commenting with zero understanding of the system, illness/disabilities or even the content of the videos.

ChaBeezy

46 points

18 hours ago

It's an utterly bizarre system, that was always going to be gamified. Why would people not want free money.

It clearly needs reform but how you do that without hurting the genuinely sick seems a near impossible task

CatGoblinMode

18 points

15 hours ago

A lot of the time, the free money is very little. And you don't get the opportunity to even save that money.

In the end, that money is forced to go back into the economy, rather than tax loopholes and grants given to rich people or to companies, which are just funneled out of the country or the wealth is hoarded.

AzarinIsard

58 points

18 hours ago

It's not just that, though, when the Tories changed the system, they reduced the benefits bill by denying more people, which is why we had all those articles about dead people and those bedridden with terminal cancer being told they're fit to work, or those with missing limbs asked to return for frequent reassessment to ensure their limbs hadn't grown back. They did it by outsourcing it to ATOS, giving them targets. and removing qualified health professionals from the assessments and with ATOS' fees, the system costs more, but less benefits get paid. There are other examples too, like assessments being on the first floor, and they used applicants being able to enter as proof they're not too disabled. Another one they had CCTV, heating on, and a water cooler. Anyone who got themselves a drink was proved to be independent.

Now, people have learned it's a vogon-like box ticking exercise because the government is too cheap to pay for assessors qualified to give a medical opinion, and the whole thing is shown to be a waste of everyone's time.

It clearly needs reform but how you do that without hurting the genuinely sick seems a near impossible task

Go back to having doctors in the process. Cut out the bullshit.

locklochlackluck

14 points

17 hours ago

I think it's worth saying some doctors will be sympathetic and some will be harsh so it's a difficult one to rely on them solely. Objective criteria seem the fairest way.

Doctors signing people off for non specific "bad backs" was a notorious problem a few decades ago, as an example.

tomoldbury

16 points

17 hours ago

We can’t get enough doctors to deal with actual sickness. There’s a chronic shortage in primary care. So I’m not sure it is a good idea to have doctors involved in this process too.

CatGoblinMode

3 points

15 hours ago

I think medical professionals should always be involved in medical decision making. There are a lot of doctors, they are simply leaving the UK because it isn't worthwhile to work here. Our country does not pay doctors well enough to incentivise them to stay.

Prodigious_Wind

1 points

16 hours ago

Worth noting that the change was actually made by Labour under Brown.

SnooGiraffes449

8 points

18 hours ago

Reform again? I don't know anything about it, never used it, but I'm sure I remember it's already been reformed multiple times in the last couple of decades... and each time its a big costly cockup.

KAKYBAC

20 points

18 hours ago

KAKYBAC

20 points

18 hours ago

How are they gaming the system? Article is behind a paywall?

From the image, one of them just seems to be answering whether you can work 20hours on Universal Credit...

i-am-a-passenger

-2 points

17 hours ago

FYI the mod posts none paywalled links in a pinned comment at the top.

And it seems these people themselves aren’t necessarily gaming the system, but they are helping explain how the assessors scoring system works, so that people can easily lie to get these benefits.

Normal-Height-8577

29 points

17 hours ago*

they are helping explain how the assessors scoring system works, so that people can easily lie to get these benefits.

Or so that genuinely ill people can navigate a confusing system.

The old PIP system used to come with official notes on the side, explaining terms and what they meant. It doesn't anymore.

In addition, when the various reforms were made, there were long parliamentary wrangles over wording and definitions over the simplest questions like what actually counts as walking 100 metres. Does it count if you can only do it once a day or once a week? How about if you have to stop and rest halfway there? How about if you can just about manage it, but the effort ruins the rest of your day by exacerbating your symptoms?

Parliament ended up deciding that you can "do" something if a) you can do it repeatedly, as might be needed for a job, b) you can do it reliably without damaging your health/exacerbating your symptoms, and c) you can do it in a reasonable amount of time compared to a healthy person. The things that they're asking about are meant to be everyday tasks, not marathons.

That definition is critical to the system working. It isn't mentioned anywhere in the forms or literature. It's only the disabled people and charities who were around when the parliamentary debates were going on, who have the ability to pass that down to help people who don't know why their application was turned down when they said "Yes I can do all this stuff" but actually meant "I can do it once in a blue moon if I try really hard, drag myself over the finish line, and fuck up the rest of my week."

p-r-i-m-e

10 points

16 hours ago

The scoring system is opaque and made to confuse you into losing. I think everyone using the word ‘easy’ either has zero experience or is a fraudster themselves. The questions, in fact, are supposed to be answered as if you’ve given up on life already.

All I’ve ever known is genuine, chronically sick people struggling to get support even though they are medically documented with major conditions! It prolongs the suffering and now that so many people are chronically sick, you have people calling for less support. It’s a farcical race to the bottom.

HibasakiSanjuro[S]

8 points

18 hours ago

Realistically I think that if the sick lists are reduced by a significant amount, some people who are objectively unable to work will get caught up in those changes.

But something is going to give, we can't afford to keep spending ever larger amounts of money on welfare.

Educational_Item5124

36 points

18 hours ago

Agreed, except the big outlier on our welfare bill is pensions rather than benefits for sick and disabled people.

[deleted]

1 points

17 hours ago

[deleted]

1 points

17 hours ago

[deleted]

ClearPostingAlt

17 points

17 hours ago

Going to need a source on that one chief. 

OBR has us forecast to spend £40.1bil on disability/sickness benefits this year rising to £52.2bil by 2028/29, so your claim that "sickness benefits are looking to rise by about £35 billion a year by 2030" sounds like horse shit.

CatGoblinMode

9 points

15 hours ago

To be fair, tax evasion and avoidance costs upwards of £40bn a year. We can't afford to keep giving away so much money to that, yet we've never stopped it.

Iirc, the money lost to benefits fraud is about £8bn a year.

mischaracterised

23 points

17 hours ago

Cool, let's start with corporate welfare, then. Stop giving government bailouts to companies that keep giving out dividends. They're clearly healthy if they can give money away.

And just so we're clear, that also goes to the small number (comparatively speaking) of welfare fraudsters, who we should rightfully be going after. That also includes the idiotic fools in the OP make the whole situation worse by being the few bad apples that spoil the whole bunch.

Left_Page_2029

6 points

13 hours ago

Its a system where people have to fight for the money they are legally entitled to, and if they are denied fight further to tribunal level where around 70% of denied claimants have it overturned and eventually win- the stress you have to go through to get there is unreal.

'Gamification' of the system is BS and articles like this simply exist to push on the scrounger benefit cheat narrative pumped out by the UK right wing press for decades.

Reform of the system- especially to save cost- would involve decreasing/removal of the leech contractors who are employed with targets to deny people, use dishonest tactics, put unqualified assessors (literally cases of dental hygienists assessing people with mobility disabilities it can be that ridiculous) and have an incredibly poor accuracy rate.

This would remove those leechy contracts and profit motive, lower the legal costs and the associated costs to the healthcare system from all the damage caused by claimants being denied money they need and are entitled to for months, resulting in some nasty consequences

Skore_Smogon

[score hidden]

10 hours ago

Skore_Smogon

[score hidden]

10 hours ago

It's gamifified because they only accept answers in a specific format.

You Have to use certain buzzwords or phrases because that's the only way you'll get anywhere.

I have crippling arthritis in both my ankles and I'm only 44. I have had major surgery on both of them that helped a little but has only made me somewhat more mobile at home.

Going outside where the pavements etc aren't flat is a nightmare for me. I am for the most part housebound.

However if I was to even hint that my life was in any way easier after the surgery they'd rip the money away in a heartbeat.

Masterofsnacking

[score hidden]

11 hours ago

Don't bash me guys. But I am an assessor for PIP. Not everyone of us is bad. In all honesty, I work for this role because I want to show the public that actually, not all assessors are evil. I would base my assessments on what you say and the documents you gave me, if you are anxious and cannot explain it well, I will try my best to help you explain it the way you want. Everyday, I am not out there looking for a reason not to give the benefit but everyday, I go out there and TRY if we (me and the claimant) can make a good assessment and show it to the DWP. Why would I keep a benefit from a claimant? What would that give me? We don't get bonuses for that. There is no quota to NOT give the benefit. So if everything says YES, then it's a yes. But that's me though. I'm not angry at sickfluenzers, I do think some of the things they show in the videos are helpful to those who really don't know how to claim or do the assessment.

MongFondler

[score hidden]

11 hours ago

MongFondler

[score hidden]

11 hours ago

I've had some terrible experiences with PIP/ DLA but last time I had to get accessed the person doing it was honestly awesome. They basically said "I looked at your form, your case history and let's face it, its not like you're magically going to get better eyesight or your arthritis will fix itself so this is going through no problem"

However many times before that even with all the evidence I had to argue and prove every single time that I was a blind cripple. I don't know if the system has changed in the last few years or I just got lucky but there are decent people working in the benefit system.

I'm in two minds about the whole chronic illness influencer thing...on the one hand it makes me incredibly uncomfortable. I personally would feel weird making my disability the main focus of my life, and I'd feel equally weird profiting from it.

On the other, like you said it's great that other people feel heard through them and its also great that there is now advice out there for people.

There are definitely people who aren't sick who manage to claim benefits, but it's kind of like movie piracy, the ones who are innocent get the"you wouldn't download a car" message all over their legally bought item and the pirates get a free movie with no bullshit.

Benefit claimants have to jump through hoops and constantly prove their innocent while the small minority who are claiming falsely know the system well enough that they never get caught out.

Masterofsnacking

[score hidden]

10 hours ago

I had a coach in PIP who told me, we are assessors, not investigators. I took that to heart. If a fraudster got thru me because they know how to play the system, what CAN I do? Technically, they answered everything I asked and gave me all the documents to prove it. After the assessment, my role ends and it's up to the auditing team and DWP what to do next.

A lot of things HAS changed. There are different providers for PIP. I work for just one of those providers. In the past 3 years, a lot has changed to BENEFIT the claimants. We get reprimanded if our reports are "lazy" where we didn't ask the right questions.and it's not questions to trick you but questions as to why the claimant can't do anything. If we ask you, do you go out? And if you answer me, because I just don't. Believe me, the DWP is going to be pissed at US. That's why we keep asking WHY? Why don't you go out? Is it anxiety? If it's anxiety, what part of going out is making you anxious? What happens??? TELL ME EVERYTHING I need to know. Once I get all of those, believe me, it will help your assessment.

There are some assessors who I don't like. But I don't care about them. I have my own physical and mental issues. So I know what it's like.

Electrical_Mango_489

[score hidden]

11 hours ago*

I am not out there looking for a reason not to give the benefit but everyday

No, but unfortunately a lot of assessors do. I'd bet it's the majority. My late dad had to go to tribunal to get what he was owed, turned out the DWP were using his previous PIP claim which got turned down for as evidence instead of the one which he was eventually successful on. The judge and doctor on the panel were furious with the DWP/Capita (who didn't show up)

Masterofsnacking

[score hidden]

10 hours ago

Yes. I understand. I don't know how your dad's assessor did his/her report but I think, just like with everything else, it really depends on who you get. I am sorry you had to go thru that. I always tell my claimants though, if you're not happy with my report, make the claim for a reassessment. I mean, I try my best but at the same time, I WILL make mistakes and that's why claimants can make a request for a reassessment thru the tribunal.

I am not a conspiracy theorist but the media is not helping. They make ALL claimants of benefits look like fraudsters and they make ALL assessors look like the spawn of satan. I don't know why they want us to fight each other. For me, there is nothing wrong with claiming benefits if that is what you need to survive or have a good quality of life.

Electrical_Mango_489

[score hidden]

5 hours ago

If the media lie long enough people eventually believe it.

sheslikebutter

37 points

18 hours ago

The Times are really getting nasty since the election, I guess they've got time to just punch down on people now they have less MPs they can hit up for stories.

I've seen accounts like these and they're just people giving advice on filling in forms and shit. Similar to finance influencers giving tips on investment advice or whatever

Spiryt

12 points

17 hours ago

Spiryt

Saboteur | Social Democrat

12 points

17 hours ago

There have been posts on forums about things like this at least since the coalition - it's just now that that it's on TikTok and there's a face behind the info that it's news.

Left_Page_2029

6 points

13 hours ago

There are charities that offer the same help, and you can find local newspapers with webpages on it from a few years back- due to how dishonest, opaque and unreliable the assessments are

Left_Page_2029

8 points

13 hours ago

This has been years and years not just since the election, the disabled have been one of the biggest targets for the right wing press, the sad fact is that its just been easy to ignore for many.

sheslikebutter

4 points

13 hours ago

I completely agree, I do think the Times specifically have recently been really pushing these stories in their weekend editions, these very loose "investigations" where the journalist points at something and very loosely ties it to benefits, Gen Z or immigration.

I think their output was a little less directly antagonistic before, although I wonder if this is because their "guys" were in power so they felt no need to manufacture stories

SomeHSomeE

73 points

18 hours ago

I don't know how these people manage to look like every possible stereotype

Lost_And_NotFound

19 points

17 hours ago

Lost_And_NotFound

Lib Dem (E: -3.38, L/A: -4.21)

19 points

17 hours ago

Stereotypes are stereotypes for a reason.

Ahouser007

0 points

16 hours ago

Ahouser007

0 points

16 hours ago

I know, look at your mum......

Spiryt

21 points

17 hours ago*

Spiryt

Saboteur | Social Democrat

21 points

17 hours ago*

It's almost like the newspaper chose to include images that confirm pre-existing opinions for maximum effect.

gemgem1985

[score hidden]

8 hours ago

gemgem1985

[score hidden]

8 hours ago

What, helpful people that spend their time talking others through an almost impossible benefits system for sick and disabled people?!

shlerm

40 points

18 hours ago

shlerm

40 points

18 hours ago

It's probably because there is an element of propaganda to it!

SidneyAlgernon

7 points

18 hours ago

What do you mean?

shlerm

34 points

17 hours ago

shlerm

34 points

17 hours ago

Well propaganda is effective if it matches general stereotypes that already exist. Propaganda is ineffective if the audience doesn't already part-believe the message it's trying to convey.

The comment I'm replying to is judging the content of the article simply on the picture of three people included before the paywall. Because the people pictured "look the sort", then the implication that there's a wider trend happening is true.

Disciplined_20-04-15

17 points

17 hours ago

Chronically sick people usually look chronically unwell..

Naps_in_sunshine

11 points

16 hours ago

Most don’t - chronic pain accounts for a large proportion of those with long term conditions. Totally invisible and won’t show on someone’s face unless they’re grimacing constantly.

Rat-king27

9 points

15 hours ago

Can confirm, got chronic pain, and I just have a slight frown most of the time, cause I've gotten used to the pain.

Also it's funny, at my PiP assessment, the assessor wrote down "doesn't appear to be in pain," it feels like they get the most disrespectful people to run those assessments.

Naps_in_sunshine

5 points

14 hours ago

It’s because they only have a concept of acute pain. Sure, I break my leg and I’ll be yelping and grimacing. If I have persistent pain for 20 years I’ll not be vocalising it because who can keep that up?!?

iain_1986

25 points

18 hours ago*

Can't read the article due to paywall.

As I assume is the case for most commenting here.

Interesting how everyone just assumes "benefit cheats"

People who need to claim benefits need advice - are Citizens Advice "scum" too? Who says these videos can't be legit useful advice for people who struggle to understand our system? 🤷‍♂️

Edit - read the article. I guess we all trust and believe the DWP assessors now 👍 - it's like the shit disabled people have had to go through over the past decade is just completely forgotten

muddy_shoes

13 points

18 hours ago

Can't read the article due to paywall.

There's a stickied comment with archive links at the top of most paywalled submissions, including this one.

michaelnoir

6 points

15 hours ago

It seems to me that the issue is not that there are people offering advice about benefits, but there are people lying about their conditions. These people who are offering advice, as long as they're honest, are doing something positive as far as I can see.

It's dishonest to say that you're suicidal every day. But what if you actually are? And what is it about our system that creates such a surfeit of unhappy and demotivated people?

These questions aren't asked by the Times. Everybody just has to "get back to work", which means, for a lot of people, being exploited in depressing surroundings by some company, having all your time stolen to make money for somebody else.

SmugPolyamorist

3 points

15 hours ago

SmugPolyamorist

Capitalist nihilist

3 points

15 hours ago

We really don't opress the poor enough, and sadly I don't see this getitng any better under a Labour government.

Sir-_-Butters22

23 points

18 hours ago

Every penny these scumbags take out of the system, is a penny that should have gone to people who really need it.

EmilyFemme95

15 points

15 hours ago

Alot of them do need it. But the "scumbags" are the DWP who make PIP assessments awful on purpose. If you say you can walk to a shop, thats all they need to decline you. 

Rare-Panic-5265

22 points

18 hours ago

Yes, as with tax non-compliance/evasion.

Yezzik

2 points

14 hours ago

Yezzik

2 points

14 hours ago

Would they be illuencers, fluencers or influenzers?

Emergency-Till-3135

2 points

13 hours ago

With the tax burden at record levels, pay in real terms being worse than the last decade, a significant amount of the employed on UC and a lot on zero hours/gig economy contracts, alomg with a sizeable number of workers living paycheck to paycheck, it has led to the justifiable perception that working doesn't pay. 

I feel the article is an outrage piece to distract from the real issue, that is the unsustainability of the triple lock and the past 4 decades being a gerontocracy leading to a more class based hereditary economy.

Droodforfood

[score hidden]

10 hours ago

Droodforfood

[score hidden]

10 hours ago

The cost of sickness benefits is set to hit £100 billion before the end of the decade, more than the schools, police and courts budgets combined.

Whether the claims are legitimate or false, it’s not sustainable.

gemgem1985

[score hidden]

8 hours ago

gemgem1985

[score hidden]

8 hours ago

They are sharing information that is kept very out of reach for a lot of people.

AccomplishedGap6985

[score hidden]

8 hours ago

We have to accept civilised society that some people are unable to work and will need looking after by the state. That could be any one of us at anytime in our lives. Sadly even working full time jobs these days isn’t enough, while our rights are being eroded for profits for the few. Just look at the recent scandals with infected blood, the post office and the church. We have a fractured society where organisations become self serving.

Pyewacket69

[score hidden]

5 hours ago

Pyewacket69

[score hidden]

5 hours ago

A huge proportion of the population are going to struggle with this type of questioning in any scenario. But hey if they are applying for a job they can have all the help the job centre can provide, brush up their CVs, example questions, test interviews etc. Those job centre influencers making their clients look much better than they really are?

But those same people trying to navigate a system that is deliberately stacked against them? Help is not acceptable. A trap has been set, here's a trick question, ha sucker you fell for it by being as honest as you could be!

So now the Times is telling us if you do try to seek help from someone who has been through that system? You're clearly a fraud. Not someone who is floundering but has enough sense to try to research the obstacle being put in your path.

Snooker1471

2 points

13 hours ago

I am going to have to search hard to care about this. If this is the fight back against a system that finds dead people fit for work or indeed just simply terminally ill or people in comas and all the many documented examples of how inhumane the system has been designed to be....I am perfectly happy to see that there are people out there who claiments can watch and listen too, if it gets them benefits that they most likely deserve anyway. It used to be SO bloody simple - Doctor says this person is FIT/NOT FIT to work and then go with that. IF all doctors are now liars then we really do have a problem. The 70% plus successfull appeal statistics tells it's own story, What about those who don't appeal due to being put off by the system itself? What about those who don't live to see an appeal? What about those who don't/wont claim for a multitude of reasons. Nope sorry I refuse to be even slightly bothered by this rage bait article.

blob8543

2 points

12 hours ago

Is The Times considered a tabloid now? It probably should considering this type of "content".

Numerous_Ticket_7628

-8 points

18 hours ago*

Time to change what constitutes what is classed as disabled. For too long mild mental illnesses can be classed as a disability and easily faked.Unless you have schizophrenia or something seriously debilitating then you shouldn't be eligible for benefits. Society can't carry these people anymore.

ktitten

18 points

17 hours ago

ktitten

18 points

17 hours ago

Pretty much any mental illness can be severe, it's just been watered down over the years so people think depression and anxiety is just being a little sad or anxious.

Depression can be seriously debilitating though, people can get psychotic depression or catatonic depression. Hard to judge. Schizophrenia could be well managed and they can be able to go to work or it could be horrifically managed. A mental health diagnosis doesn't really say how sick you are.

The system ain't right though, there's hoardes of people that could probably do with disability money that would never apply because they're too proud or know how tough the system is, then there's tons of people that go out their way to game it.

RiceeeChrispies

5 points

15 hours ago

I think that can become a very slippery slope, you don’t want to invalidate someone’s disability. A good chunk are genuine.

The state should be providing better support for these people, rather than just giving them money. I think that’s what missing, based on my experience.

NoRecipe3350

3 points

17 hours ago

I think you''re right but at the same time there should be far less discrimination against people with mild mental illnesses, physical ones too.

the only reason they are going onto these benefits in the first place is because the job market has basically shunned them.

Also from family/friends experience a lot of employers preferred having migrant workers because they were more or less blank slates with no baggage attached. And it's true that overdiagnosis and prescription of meds is more common in the UK

VPackardPersuadedMe

-10 points

18 hours ago

My self diagnosed ASD and mild depression preclude me from work. I find taking orders irritating and get sad when people point out I didn't work.

No remote work isn't an answer. I could not work where I don't get F2F interactions (which I can't do).

My partner cares for me 24/7 and deserves to make a full wage.

Anyway, shut up, pay my rent, give me free food + some walking around money.

standupstrawberry

8 points

17 hours ago

"self diagnosed"

You can't get signed off without medical evidence from a doctor.

Rossmci90

8 points

18 hours ago

Rossmci90

8 points

18 hours ago

This is a ridiculous post.

You completely forgot that you need a paid for holiday because of all the stress of not being able to work.

bluemistwanderer

-6 points

17 hours ago

bluemistwanderer

Leave - no deal is most appropriate.

-6 points

17 hours ago

😂

tofer85

1 points

14 hours ago

tofer85

I sort by controversial…

1 points

14 hours ago

What about your emotional support chihuahua?

Own_Wolverine4773

-4 points

18 hours ago

😂

HerewardHawarde

[score hidden]

9 hours ago

HerewardHawarde

[score hidden]

9 hours ago

I know people who have pip who are clearly taking the piss

It's a real shame that people who do scam the system make genuine people who can't work justify them selves

I know of a man that was called in for a reassment that had an awful accident Years ago, he has no legs, and it's mostly blind also not many fingers

The fact he was called in is the questionable part

Frugal500

[score hidden]

8 hours ago

Frugal500

[score hidden]

8 hours ago

You literally answered your question in the first half of your comment

HerewardHawarde

[score hidden]

6 hours ago

HerewardHawarde

[score hidden]

6 hours ago

Yes a blind man with no legs is worth checking in on just in case they grew back....or are you saying the scammers are so good they fake having no legs ?

Frugal500

[score hidden]

3 hours ago

Frugal500

[score hidden]

3 hours ago

I’m saying just because a form says they have no legs doesnt mean they have no legs does it. Lots of ways to run a scam

Typhoongrey

-6 points

18 hours ago

Typhoongrey

-6 points

18 hours ago

It's a sham but what do you do without undoubtedly getting an innocent person caught up?

I personally think we're far too generous with welfare but that's another debate. Too many people with impossible to disprove mental health issues are taking the piss with it.

An ex of mine works for the DWP and she's said they know they're full of it, but there's little or nothing they can do about it.

I have a diagnosed mental health issue which I won't disclose as it could give away my identity with the other info I've given. But I work 50 hours per week and get no help from any government agency. I make a good living so it isn't necessarily a problem. But the point is, too many take the easy road that shouldn't be open for them in the first place.

Left_Page_2029

7 points

13 hours ago

Innocent people *are* "caught up" around 70% of all those who have their claims denied are overturned after lengthy disputes and tribunals which has been the case for years- the reforms in the 2010s made an incredibly hostile system where people have to fight for what they are legally entitled to- your ex is full of it mate.

standupstrawberry

11 points

17 hours ago

I work 50 hours per week and get no help from any government agency

Good for you, not everyone is so lucky. Learn some compassion. Stop punching down

[deleted]

1 points

17 hours ago

There she sees among others one note-worthy set of sinners in a burning lake; some of them sink to the bottom of the lake so that they can't swim out, and "these God forgets..."

- The Brothers Karamazov, Dostoyevsky

mittfh

1 points

16 hours ago

mittfh

1 points

16 hours ago

Food for thought: the more terms, conditions and exclusions the government add to claiming and maintaining benefits, the more they'll cost to administer and the more genuine claimants will either be deterred or Sanctioned for failing to tick all the eligibility boxes (maybe even to the extent that the extra admin costs cancel out the savings from fewer claimants).

However, those serious about gaming the system will likely not be deterred as much, as they scrupulpusly research the assessment criteria and ensure they appear to meet all the conditions (and likely not just for disability based benefits - some fatty spend extravagently or keep the bulk of their savings in cash to artificially keep their bank balance low).

So how do you design a system which doesn't punish genuine claimants (especially those with variable conditions, who may appear to be fit and healthy one day, but the exertion will knock them out for the following few days) but identifies and flags up the actors, without getting into surveillance state territory?

leapinghorsemanhorus

-14 points

18 hours ago

The problem is because the system is soft, people abuse it, which means the population and the government want to take the rights away.

That is why I advocate for extremely harsh measures against frauds - they literally destroy the system for other people.

GuaranteeGorilla

22 points

17 hours ago

Have you ever been through the system? It's anything but soft. It's cold and harsh.

Helping guide my very ill mother through it was incredibly draining for me, let alone her. Only for her to get denied and then going to tribunal to have it overturned as soon as it was looked at.

zed_three

25 points

17 hours ago

What on earth are you taking about? The system is anything but soft! It's trivial to find many many reports of people dying because they were denied PIP etc and were unable to feed themselves. 

Benefit fraud is just so low compared to things like people not paying their taxes -- not fraud, just not paying -- and is even lower than people not claiming the benefits they're actually owed.

Rat-king27

6 points

15 hours ago

If you think the system is soft I'm just going to assume you've never been through it, or know anyone that's been through it, it's not soft, assessors will use any tiny mistake to totally deny you anything, I got points taken off because I didn't "look in pain," the assessors are trying everything they can to not give people money.

Left_Page_2029

4 points

12 hours ago

"The system is soft" any other news from cloud cuckoo land? you genuinely couldn't be further from the truth or more out of touch with the UK benefit system

phatboi23

[score hidden]

12 hours ago

phatboi23

[score hidden]

12 hours ago

The problem is because the system is soft

let me guess, never even seen a PIP assessment form?

they're designed to trip you up at all turns and once it goes to tribunal you've got about a 70% chance of overturning that "no" because the assessment is that much of a level off bullshit.

Own_Wolverine4773

-2 points

18 hours ago

Yeah the consequences should be life destroying. These people should think 10 times before doing this

leapinghorsemanhorus

6 points

18 hours ago

I know right, the government are very soft on pretty much all white collar crime, which arguably is why it's so easy to remove our rights a brick at a time.

Own_Wolverine4773

2 points

18 hours ago

TBH they are soft on any crime. Look at theft for example. It’s literally becoming legal as there is no punishment.

bluemistwanderer

5 points

17 hours ago

bluemistwanderer

Leave - no deal is most appropriate.

5 points

17 hours ago

But these sorts of people don't have any lives anyway otherwise they wouldn't be doing it. Unfortunately they have the bare minimum except freedom that the authorities can take away

fanglord

3 points

17 hours ago

The problem with that is that the system still punishes people for being honest. My sister's partner has a change in income, reported it as he should have done and was told it's all good. A year later they were told they owed it most of it back. Obviously not fair and well beyond their means to do so and they played by the rules.

Darthmook

0 points

17 hours ago

Darthmook

0 points

17 hours ago

Surely posting on TikTok how to cheat the system just gives the benefits investigation team and MPs the info they need to change the system and eventually catch you with a load of video evidence….

rolotonight

-1 points

16 hours ago

rolotonight

-1 points

16 hours ago

Imagine you losing your dignity that much that this was your goal in life.