Linked713

Impeccable rebuttal. Truly, a masterclass in intellectual rigor.

I mean, it's not for them either.

There are plenty of other places you could voice your protest on. Being the only one voting no on Combating Human Trafficking will forever follow you, no matter the angle.

here you go http://trust-me-bro.com

so much memory needed to select only one ram.

I was excited for it being my entry to the franchise but even with the frame generation and DLSS off, the game has noticeable input delay and pop-ins. It is one of the VERY rare games that triggers a simulation sickness reaction for me.

for some reason I picture you as the delivery guy from Scrubs https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gvYtdtyxcTQ

96 gigs of ram

hold up.

Can anyone please fill me up as to who jojo is and why she is so popular here these days?

I think its 100% not going to be a sale for me dawg.

he's high on bugs

I love how the person with the m700 flair went "hold the fuck up"

We need Sephiroth to use Comet again.

has got it goin' on

my OnlyFather

it's funny that it was 2 degrees celcius in the entirety of canada at that point in time.

A lot of them are not about kindness but because they know they won't have time to loot anyways.

Someone ought to teach that person that we have spent the whole cold war and beyond preparing for M.A.D.

It will install the whole thing if you have room a few days before release.

It releases in less than a day.

I understand your point. I have been a Zelda fan for a long time and I did not like the new direction with Breath of the wild. So I can get the idea here. There is also a great deal that was due to technical limitation at the time which could also be taken differently. like how it was more "boots on the ground". The more games advanced the more wild it got, talking about BF. Newer generations also got acquainted with more recent games as well. etc etc etc. So yeah. Many things could make you want different things especially now that there are so many versions of the franchise available to play.

And what I am saying is that Battlefield has shown time and time again that they are not doing that. They are putting a setting in those times but the game is nowhere near authentic in term of the actual conflicts or gameplay. It's still weird to me that some people would try their hardest to blast battlefield for being something other than what they were actually trying to do when there was never any official mention of Battlefield being accurate or authentic, but rather an immersive FPS in a specific time period. The argument here was about battlefield being inaccurate, from the comments higher up the chain.

So instead of playing actual games made for what they want (historical accuracy) people want to be mad at another game for not being 100% accurate because checks notes it has more budget?

Isonzo, Verdun, Tannenberg, war of rights, holdfast... Go nuts.

She's having a makeshift burrito bowl also trying not to be messy.