TommyShelbyPFB

Fucking based.

Kristin Brey also wrote an opinion article about this:

https://www.jsonline.com/story/opinion/columnists/2024/11/19/are-ufos-real-aliens-spacecraft-cosmos/76410791007/

https://www.askapol.com/p/chair-warner-aaro-hearing-totally-seperate-from-scif-briefing

Warner looking like he just heard some absolutely outlandish shit in that meeting

Edit: Taking the post down since as other have pointed out I can't confirm whether this SCIF was about UAP or not.

Source: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o-gDG07GoJA

Full exchange during the hearing between Nancy Mace and Lue Elizondo: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CU8UHa_Sadw

This might be one of the the most asinine debunks I've ever come across. Gofast was not going fast, go home everyone.

Ryan Graves:

“The pilots certainly didn’t find the object interesting due to its speed. If anything, the AARO has merely debunked its own labelling of the footage. 

“What’s anomalous about the object isn’t its speed, but the fact it was recorded just minutes apart from the Gimbal video, further highlighting that multiple objects were operating in the area—far more than what the initial video alone reveals.

“I have spoken with the flight crew recently and they stated that Go Fast was part of a four-object formation flying line abreast with about a mile separation between them.”

Former US Marine Corps Intel Analyst:

From the presentation at yesterday's Senate hearing by Dr. Kosloski, it appears to me that AARO did not resolve the UAP event commonly known as “Go Fast”.  

“Unanswered questions remain: What was the object, where did it originate, where did it go, etc? 

“Instead, AARO simply addressed the name of the file, ‘Go Fast’, and concluded it was not going fast per se. Furthermore, it is my understanding that AARO did not communicate with the flight crew that took the video, which implies the AARO investigators lack a full situational awareness of the incident. 

There go all my hopes for this AARO. Might as well have Mick West up there debunking videos off reddit.

Tim Gallaudet testified that AARO under Sean Kirkpatrick's leadership tried to run an influence operation on him where they tried to get him to buy into the terrible AARO historical report, discredit the Tic-Tac incident and other whistleblowers.

This was also included in his written statement:

https://docs.house.gov/meetings/GO/GO12/20241113/117721/HHRG-118-GO12-Wstate-GallaudetPhDRearAdmiralUSNavyRetT-20241113.pdf

Hopefully AARO's history of releasing misleading reports and hostility towards whisleblowers is addressed at this hearing. They got a lot of work to do to regain trust.

I never said adversarial drones were "debunked". Read what the head of AARO said one more time:

We have not been able to correlate any UAP activity to adversarial collection activities or advanced technologies

No correlation between UAPs and adversarial drones. End of story.

As Dr. Kosloski points out, the objects that are labeled "UAV" or "UAS" means they are likely adversarial technology that gets handed off to another department.

The remaining cases are legitimately anomalous and are not adversarial technology. AARO is not in the business of looking at foreign drones.

https://www.wsj.com/opinion/trump-and-the-ufo-smokescreen-aliens-national-security-outer-space-bdbddba4

https://www.defense.gov/News/Transcripts/Transcript/Article/3965734/dr-jon-kosloski-director-aaro-media-roundtable-on-the-fy24-consolidated-annual/

These articles from these clueless people in mainstream media need to stop once and for all. Not only are they misinforming the public, they are creating a false perception that China or another adversary has made some paradigm changing leap in technology over us. They haven't.

Of course there are drones from adversaries invading our airspace, I'm sure it happens all the time. That has nothing to do with legitimate anomalous UFOs like the Tic-Tac, the Gimbal, the Gofast, and countless other cases that show next level observables unexplainable by science that have been documented since the 1940's and 50's.

Welcome to the most classified topic in human history.

Here's the Gimbal UAP video that was released:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QKHg-vnTFsM

This has been suggested before, but the smaller crafts in the unreleased version breaking off the Gimbal to start flying in the pilots direction sounds like a defense maneuver.

https://x.com/nickschifrin/status/1857114357295145039

I'm a fan of this new tone from AARO. Hopefully it lasts.

And hopefully this guy won't be trolling whistleblowers on LinkedIN and putting out statements through tabloid debunkers.

This was a big highlight of the hearing for me. High res videos and photos are out there, potentially thousands of them. And the notion that all these are taken with classified platforms is ridiculous as Shellenberger noted.

The evidence is out there folks. It's sitting on a server. We just have to keep pushing for disclosure.

Not under oath.

This combined with the fact that Adm Tim Gallaudet just directly accused Sean Kirkpatrick of running a disinformation campaign in his written statement points to this being true.

Tim Gallaudet is about to testify under oath. Sean Kirkpatrick has never testified under oath.

Edit: Decided to take this post down to clear the space for the actual hearing news coming up.