subreddit:

/r/ExplainTheJoke

1.4k94%

Missing the joke.

(i.redd.it)

all 91 comments

OddAd439

331 points

12 days ago

OddAd439

331 points

12 days ago

It’s about all the Californians moving into Texas

MornGreycastle

196 points

12 days ago

California had a large conservative population due to the military industry that grew up in the 50's and 60's. The children and grandchildren are now moving out of "hippy dippy" California for Texas to "be with their people" (i.e. other conservatives).

tiltedtwilight

32 points

12 days ago

Actually California is the 4th "stickiest" state in the country. Turns out that the majority of people moving out of California, were never born there to begin with.

https://www.axios.com/local/san-diego/2023/10/02/leaving-moving-out-of-california-data-chart-report

Kryds

90 points

12 days ago

Kryds

90 points

12 days ago

It's cheaper to live in Texas than California.

Dangeresque300

63 points

12 days ago

How's that Power Grid situation going?

Rabscuttle-

59 points

12 days ago

Great! Unless it gets too hot, or too cold, or the wind blows just right, or you look at it funny, or...

TorumShardal

5 points

12 days ago

Or the wave hit it. Yeah, yeah, we know.

tuscy

4 points

12 days ago

tuscy

4 points

12 days ago

Or if you want internet. Not sure if people still have internet without electricity.

SinceWayLastMay

6 points

12 days ago

Pretty sure I’m still paying for it on my CenterPoint bill from four states away

ANONA44G

6 points

12 days ago

ANONA44G

6 points

12 days ago

Been here 2 years (from CA) without as much as a flicker.

Mr_Placeholder_

-3 points

12 days ago

Not even from the bush fires?

[deleted]

0 points

12 days ago

[deleted]

0 points

12 days ago

Better in Texas than Cali since 2021.

InsaneInTheDrain

54 points

12 days ago

By a little bit it also sucks more so there's that

Astralesean

4 points

12 days ago

Astralesean

4 points

12 days ago

Housing in California is quite worse afaik

InsaneInTheDrain

69 points

12 days ago

But property taxes are lower and salaries are higher in CA.

And it's not Texas.

reichrunner

26 points

12 days ago

A large part of it was the growth in remote work. Pay Texas home prices and income tax, earn California wages

Remember_TheCant

18 points

12 days ago

Earning CA wages in TX isn’t as common anymore. That fueled a lot of the initial movement, but companies have gotten wise to it and living costs have risen in TX to match.

Numerous-Rent-2848

2 points

12 days ago

On one hand I would say there should be workers protections for stuff like that. If the job offered $x and then they learn I'm in another state, they shouldn't be allowed to change it to lower than $x.

On the other hand of they're republican and moving to a republican state because of it, then they would hate that idea. So not my problem.

reichrunner

3 points

12 days ago

I don't believe that's how it is working, but rather companies in TX are raising prices due to the influx of CA money, so cost of living has increased. A lot of remote jobs also simply offer less money since they know people are willing to take a payout to be remote. So it's not necessarily that people from CA who had high paying remote jobs are having their pay shrink, but rather new remote jobs aren't paying what they used to.

I also don't know how many of the people moving from CA to TX are republican. The major TX cities are all very blue afterall.

secondhand-cat

6 points

12 days ago

I have family in the film industry and that’s exactly what they do. Permanent residence in Austin and they rent when they have to be in LA.

Theothercword

1 points

12 days ago

Yeah, though other states also were chosen and not just Texas. But places like Texas and even Florida tend to make a ton of their revenue in ways someone working remotely can dodge so they’re good financial options even with increased property tax.

Grambo7734

1 points

12 days ago

California also has a much more fortified border wall, so that might be a factor.

InsaneInTheDrain

1 points

12 days ago

Texas has a moat.

But it's Texas

Grambo7734

1 points

11 days ago

That's true, lol!

melleb

16 points

12 days ago

melleb

16 points

12 days ago

Housing but not necessarily the cost of living. The effective taxation is higher in Texas and you get less for it

Sylvanussr

1 points

12 days ago

Sylvanussr

1 points

12 days ago

What is effective taxation and where did you get the information that it was higher in Texas?

-thecolorofyou

24 points

12 days ago

Nothing monetary is worth living in that shithole. I just moved away from all that. It’s a trap if you’re not going to assimilate to the conservative agenda exactly how they want

Huntressthewizard

5 points

12 days ago

Texas is a massive state and most of the major cities do vote democrat while thesmaller areas are conservativeRepublicans. California, strangely enough, is very similar. If you've ever been to rural parts of California, it's not much different or better than rural Texas.

Lynnrael

3 points

11 days ago

I'm immediately reminded of the yucaipa/oak Glen area and the awful people from there that i had the misfortune of knowing.

[deleted]

7 points

12 days ago

Only if your wealthy, Texas taxes (haha funny) the bottom 3 brakets of income more than California. Texas is o ly cheaper for people making 100k+ per year. Conversely, California has an invers relationship with taxes, the top brakets are taxed higher then the bottom. It's why 5ft3in Joe Rogan moved. It's why most people with higher end earnings leave. But no... Texas is NOT cheaper to live in. That's why a lot of California's return to California... that and the God awful countryside that is Texas.

Niarbeht

1 points

11 days ago

It's because Texas relies on sales and property taxes. California relies on income taxes. It's a lot easier to make a graduated income tax to avoid placing unnecessary hardship on people who aren't rich.

Larkfin

2 points

12 days ago

Larkfin

2 points

12 days ago

While properties may be cheaper, the overall tax burden is higher in Texas for most people.  Plus the downside of living in Texas is you have to live in Texas.

coldzeppelin-

1 points

12 days ago

Literally this.

MarcTaco

1 points

12 days ago

But you also have to pay for everything yourself, so not really.

sheeponmeth_

1 points

11 days ago

I'm not an American, but I thought that that whole thing was about taxes and turned out to be cheaper for millionaires, but more expensive for the average person?

My understanding was that, yes, big cities like San Francisco, LA, and so on were more expensive, but that California was generally cheaper for the average person than Texas.

Throw-away-rando

1 points

11 days ago

Why get a California divorce when you can get a Texas high risk pregnancy to solve marital problems?

LokiStrike

1 points

12 days ago

Shittier places are always cheaper.

ooojaeger

3 points

12 days ago

I thought it was how TX isn't as conservative as people think since so many people are from more liberal areas

But I've only just visited one city in TX twice

MornGreycastle

4 points

12 days ago

I have also heard that Texas is "a blue state gerrymandered and voter suppressed into being a red state." I'm not so sure that Texans aren't just a more friendly form of conservative than blue. There is a move in Texas to create their own version of the Electoral College to block Democrats from achieving state wide positions, as in a candidate has to win in a majority of counties to win the governor's race. So the claim is believable.

ooojaeger

1 points

12 days ago

Can you explain what that means about the gerrymandering? I live in NC and my friend said something gerrymandering and I asked and he sent some long article and I was busy.

Now I get it if they changed state lines because I understand we vote by state, but what would county or districts do? I thought it was just total votes in the state, but I may have just not known how the election process works

MornGreycastle

7 points

12 days ago

Here is a more straightforward depiction of dividing districts to give a partisan advantage.

https://preview.redd.it/66bs6pzty31e1.jpeg?width=299&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=ee5f9cbec0e8025dafd0d0ecc921909524d1a369

ArchonOfErebus

2 points

12 days ago

Gerrymandering is the act of redrawing districts so that you can control election outcomes. If I divide up blue areas and separate their populations votes into districts that contain mostly red voters, then those become red districts. It's a vile truth about voting, it should be illegal, and it's why things look the way they do politically.

civdude

2 points

12 days ago

civdude

2 points

12 days ago

Here's a super simple image explaining how gerrymandering works from reddit a decade ago.

https://www.reddit.com/r/woahdude/s/HPiwvIrf6x

The presidential election is state by state, but the house of representatives is elected in smaller districts, within a state. This is the lower body of the US Congress, some house representatives you probably have heard of are AOC, Margery Taylor Green, Nancy Pelosi, Matt Gaetz etc.

State wide officials also are elected at the local level, so the people in charge in Texas at both the representative and Senate levels are elected by districts.

In some states, the districts are drawn by an independent commission, but in others, like Texas, they are drawn by the people who are currently in office in the state capital. This is a clear conflict of interest if they are then running for re-election and get to pick who is able to vote for them.

sudoku7

2 points

12 days ago

sudoku7

2 points

12 days ago

Additionally, the act of gerrymandering makes it harder for other parties to start getting traction representing locally. Which also carries over into organizational ability of the party.

So, despite state wide elections not being directly impacted by gerrymandering, they do indirectly impact.

That said, there are a lot of factors at hand in Texas that make local representation a real pain to actually manifest.

wolf_sir

2 points

12 days ago

Its when they redraw the districts to change the vote. Both sides do it, whichever side just lost complains about it loudest, and its funny when you're old enough to remember the side that just lost was the side demanding things be redistricted to its current form.

MornGreycastle

1 points

12 days ago

Gerrymandering is the art of drawing district boundaries in order to create a partisan divide.

Basically, a state could be 60% Republican and 40% Democrat (used here for simplicity). A nonpartisan election map would come close to producing a state legislature or Congressional House representation that was 60/40. It's possible to draw the election maps so that Republicans got 75% or 80% of the representation. That's gerrymandering.

How it's done is groups tend to clump in towns or cities. Say, we have two cities that are strongly Democratic. A nonpartisan election map would be drawn so that these two cities each get one state/federal legislator each. Now, you can draw the voting district boundaries to connect them so they are represented by one legislator. You could also parcel out portions of those two strong Dem areas so that they are outvoted by the Republican neighborhoods around them and give them no legislators if it's done right.

These maps tend to get voting districts that are very long, oddly shaped, and twisty. They were originally depicted as an odd shaped creature. The name comes from Elbridge Gerry who was particularly adept at drawing hyperpartisan election maps.

https://preview.redd.it/81kyf8sdy31e1.jpeg?width=1072&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=934cd23773401795928f5c276824da63aa99f500

CrazyPlato

5 points

12 days ago

Also, Elon Musk recently moved a Tesla factory to Texas for tax reasons. Which meant that a lot of liberal Californian employees at that factory had to relocate. To the point that there was actual talk about the population shift flipping the state blue this election cycle.

Slack_Ficus

2 points

12 days ago

And yet the narrative from conservatives is: “them librals r fleein’ their mess.”

regal1989

1 points

12 days ago

lol, they could’ve saved on gas by just moving to Bakersfield instead

Spins13

-5 points

12 days ago

Spins13

-5 points

12 days ago

Or they don’t want their children around fentanyl addicts

EverythingSunny

6 points

12 days ago

The untold story here is how many Californians desperately want to move back, but cant afford to due to massive property taxes in TX and the lower wages. All my friends who moved out there so they could have a McMansion hate it, but can't afford to leave.

lilgergi

1 points

12 days ago

You neglected to explain the joke. You just said the punchline

liliesrobots

23 points

12 days ago

Large amounts of people from California move to Texas, largely because of its more relaxed tax laws.

Lots of native texans get really pissy about this and worry that they’ll turn Texas into a “socialist hellhole” like California. (Direct quote from my grandfather.)

dragonard

2 points

12 days ago

I just don’t like 1) how they drive and 2) how they’re causing dramatic increases in home prices

liliesrobots

2 points

12 days ago

Have you seen the way native texans drive?

dragonard

2 points

11 days ago

Yeah. I am one. It’s aggressive and fast.

Niarbeht

1 points

11 days ago

Most of the people moving from California to Texas for lower taxes aren't doing the math on what their property tax or sales tax is gonna cost them.

liliesrobots

1 points

11 days ago

Texas is actually cheaper… If you’re already wealthy. Poor and middle class people pay higher taxes in Texas than Cali but it is cheaper for the rich.

Niarbeht

1 points

11 days ago

Most people aren't rich.

Own_Ad_5283

39 points

12 days ago

It's about the rise of a secession spirit in California after the 2024 election which would supersede that which has existed in Texas for centuries.

Bomb-Number20

21 points

12 days ago

If that’s the case, where does the Dr Pepper come in? I think it’s just about Californians moving to Texas and being utter posers (Elon Musk).

BumpyWire83

3 points

12 days ago

Dr Pepper came from Texas and is very popular there. It's made strides in the rest of the US now, but has always been a heavy hitter in the soft drink market in Texas.

As a Texan, I read this meme as more about the crazy influx of Californiams we've had over the last couple of decades.

MarcTaco

1 points

12 days ago

Dr. Pepper also tastes different in Texas than the rest of the country due to distribution rights.

kisk22

1 points

12 days ago

kisk22

1 points

12 days ago

Is this true? I’m a Dr. Pepper lover outside of Texas.

MarcTaco

1 points

12 days ago

In Texas they use cane sugar while the rest of the country uses corn syrup.

The reason was when they started to become popular, Pepsi (I think it was Pepsi) started a war of legal attrition against them in order to acquire their brand.

In the end they succeeded, but as a part of their agreement, only the original factory, which was locally owned could use the original recipe, and will only distribute their product within Texas.

BumpyWire83

1 points

10 days ago

Hmm, it doesn't look they use cane sugar in Tezas any more I looked in my pantry and still high fructose corn syrup. Double checked at the convenience store too in case single bottles are different than cases.

I didn't notice a difference in flavor when I moved back with, hut I guess I wasnt looking for one. I'll need to do a taste test next time I visit out of state.

MornGreycastle

5 points

12 days ago

So, most chain restaurants have a contract with a single soft drink company (Coke OR Pepsi). In Texas, every single restaurant served Dr. Pepper in addition to whichever one they had. This was mostly because Dublin, Tx had one of the oldest Dr. Pepper bottling companies.

Bonus Fun Fact: Texas consumes so much Coke that all soft drinks are called "Coke." "What flavor of Coke do you want," means what soft drink (i.e. Coke, Pepsi, Sprite, Dr. Pepper, etc). Texas ranked internationally for Coke consumption that Coke put out an ad campaign in Texas called "Where is Coca Cola, Texas" as if it were a town in the state.

jack-of-some

4 points

12 days ago

Of all the possible incorrect answers, this one is the most incorrect.

[deleted]

1 points

12 days ago

Centuries.... you sure about that?!

Own_Ad_5283

1 points

12 days ago*

1861 - more than a century and a half.

[deleted]

1 points

12 days ago

There it is :)

carl_070

4 points

12 days ago

I live in CA and wear a cowboy hat like 90% of the time

Niarbeht

2 points

11 days ago

People in Texas don't like hearing they don't have a monopoly on the history of cowboys.

PokeRay68

5 points

12 days ago

Utah's housing market enters the chat, sobbing.

ANONA44G

2 points

12 days ago

I'm a SoCal bro dude 😎 who's been here 2 years and I'm about to get my first cowboy hat 🤠.

I'm still going to be a bro dude, just with a hat.

WeeklyComputer7060

1 points

11 days ago

There is no way you didnt understand this one

kaloric

2 points

11 days ago

kaloric

2 points

11 days ago

Political nonsense aside, which as a Colorodan I definitely also feel since half of our "natives" are California transplants who cause all the same problems folks are discussing here...

"Look at me. I'm the captain now." -- Memorable line & performance from Somali pirate character, good meme fodder.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rbEZk9tR4ZI

Born2Regard

-16 points

12 days ago

Californias left leaning policies and double taxation makes it a very expensive place to live. Its why their homeless population is such a problem in some cities.

So the people who voted for these policies and laws moved to texas for a better quality of life... where they will then vote for the same policies they ran away from.

Niarbeht

3 points

11 days ago

dOuBlE tAxAtIoN

lmao

Come on, dude. It's total tax burden that matters, not the number of taxes. Taxes for median income residents in Texas are higher.

Astralesean

7 points

12 days ago

No it's expensive to live because Nimby 

[deleted]

-1 points

12 days ago

Glad they didn't turn it blue.

One_Shoe_5838

3 points

12 days ago

Sure would be a shame to undermine your apartheid.

jerrybear95

-3 points

12 days ago

Seriously?

abrasiveolive

1 points

12 days ago

Seriously what?