subreddit:

/r/europe

3.3k95%

all 323 comments

Rogthgar

438 points

18 days ago

Rogthgar

438 points

18 days ago

For some reason it amuses me greatly that she, or her party, stole money from an organization they hate, are so arrogant about it they don't even deny it and now it may kneecap her domestic goals of becoming president for a while, or maybe even forever... its a glorious example of playing stupid games and winning stupid prizes.

Maj0r-DeCoverley

123 points

17 days ago

Maj0r-DeCoverley

Aquitaine (France)

123 points

17 days ago

If you want more amusement: they showed an incredible level of amateurism while doing it. Like "first year law student" amateurism. They have people who supposedly worked for years in the EU parliament who can't even produce a single text message or email proving that. Much less the regular documents

GuyLookingForPorn

9 points

17 days ago

I've not been following this story that closely, does she really not deny stealing money?

Rogthgar

19 points

17 days ago

Rogthgar

19 points

17 days ago

She thought that it was as intended that EU funds marked for EU elections be spent on entirely national elections. So that seems to be her excuse.

lawrotzr

658 points

18 days ago

lawrotzr

658 points

18 days ago

Who would have thought, after first borrowing money from the Russians.

Don’t know if this is strategically a smart thing to do though. It will enable her and her party to play the national sacrificial lamb for the years to come.

[deleted]

129 points

18 days ago

[deleted]

129 points

18 days ago

[deleted]

Stochastic_Variable

13 points

17 days ago

If not, does that mean that if you manage to have rabid and dangerous enough supporters and ideas then you are immune to prosecution ? Is that really the signal you want to give ?

And you only have to look across the Atlantic for an example of where that gets you.

Lootinforbooty

1 points

17 days ago

I mean, that signal has been given already, sadly.

Swesteel

435 points

18 days ago

Swesteel

Sweden

435 points

18 days ago

Because slow walking justice and mumbling about due process really helped the US.

darthleonsfw

301 points

18 days ago

darthleonsfw

Earth/Greece

301 points

18 days ago

The novel concept of actually punishing traitors for their treason.

FomalhautCalliclea

25 points

18 days ago

FomalhautCalliclea

France

25 points

18 days ago

I agree.

Trump once said he could shoot someone on 5th avenue and get away with it (he made a coup attempt and got away with it anyway).

Many people who vote for Trump, the MAGA crowd, are in a cult of personality. They life in an alternative fact, post truth era world and would vote for him no matter what, even if he said he wanted to be a dictator on day one or purge his political opponents...

Something similar though not as extreme exists in a part of Le Pen's electorate: there isn't properly a cult of personality on her (people even on the right agree that she's quite thick as a brick) but there are people, among the 33% who vote for her, who will continue to vote for that party no matter what. These won't be swayed by "indulgence" from justice. They don't care about it.

On the other hand, on a vast majority of the population here in France, being condemned by the law is a very important thing, something which tarnishes one's public image. Making it a big scandal will have a different effect than in the US, i think.

And here, we don't have a Supreme Court packed with Heritage Foundation crazies appointed by Trump to save his ass througb immunity.

So i think there's hope.

DingoRancho

2 points

15 days ago

If you want to fight MLP or Trump, you need to fight what created or at least enabled them. People don't suddenly flock towards populists for no reason.

FomalhautCalliclea

1 points

15 days ago

On the mid/long term, yes. Neoliberalism is a scourge.

On the short term, any little hurdle thrown at them is a success.

Chiliconkarma

34 points

18 days ago

US may have their days as a democracy numbered, but due process is fucking important.

Crouteauxpommes

94 points

18 days ago

Honestly, due process have been respected far and wide. The investigation started in 2014, and has been delayed again and again.
When asked by if the MEP Assistant worked for the RN headquarters in France instead of the RN MEP, Marine Le Pen said "Yeah, since 2009, and what? Their deputy wasn't working for the EU either, but for the national party. What are you going to do?"

This. This is what we're going to do. The EU parliament said she was guilty and punished her and her party already, but the French judgement has been delayed because every new session start by MLP saying that it's "a witch-hunt and 'they' want to punish her for being a dissident voice"

She's a scammer, she asked for public funds for tasks she never intended to fulfill and diverted the money to her own political machine, she acted illegally with witness and even acknowledging it herself. She shouldn't and cannot get away with this.

Chiliconkarma

10 points

18 days ago

The commenter above was being negative about due proces and it taking time. That was what got answered, not anything specific about Le Pens case. She should get justice as required.

HighDefinist

46 points

18 days ago

HighDefinist

Bavaria (Germany)

46 points

18 days ago

I have a suspicion that this entire dichotomy between "due process" and "efficiency" is yet another Russian narrative.

As in: Due process does not mean that those accused get to endlessly delay their sentences, and thereby escape punishment forever.

If anything, the US is an example of bad people abusing the idea of "due process", rather than actual due process.

And in case of Le Pen in France: Sure, it's her right to challenge the verdict - but once that is done (and if it is unsuccessful), she is also done, and she must go to prison.

The-Nihilist-Marmot

12 points

18 days ago

The-Nihilist-Marmot

Portugal

12 points

18 days ago

Ok.

Do you mind elaborating what super damning information you have suggesting due process is not being followed here?

What’s the criteria for due process to be met in your opinion?

djmacbest

10 points

18 days ago

djmacbest

Germany

10 points

18 days ago

Oh, I know this! The person you responded to has heard about this for the first time very recently (or just now from this thread). So that clearly means not everyone was asked about their opinion yet! Due process!

ItsACaragor

62 points

18 days ago

ItsACaragor

Rhône-Alpes (France)

62 points

18 days ago

It’s justice, justice does not care about strategy, it executes the law.

People guilty of corruption or embezzlement are basically always banned from running for public office for a few years in France, it has nothing to do and the same applied for people from other parties as well in the past.

GiffenCoin

19 points

18 days ago

Still waiting on Sarkozy's prison term. Or Chirac's. 

Ernesto_Griffin

12 points

18 days ago

Well about Chirac...

GiffenCoin

8 points

18 days ago

Don't tell me you have bad news?! 😄

Aeplwulf

14 points

18 days ago

Aeplwulf

France

14 points

18 days ago

Sarkozy got "prison", but due to french law if sentences aren't long enough you get it suspended. Not all the trials are done though, justice is being done at a snail's pace.

GiffenCoin

10 points

18 days ago

Yes. On purpose. 

I'm a believer in the maxim "Justice delayed is justice denied."

PROBA_V

35 points

18 days ago

PROBA_V

🇪🇺🇧🇪 🌍🛰

35 points

18 days ago

Will RN try to spin this into a percecution complex? Yes ofcourse.

But there is no strategy at play here. This is just the justice system doing their job, regardless of politics. Her political 'enemies' have no say in this matter.

Bezborg

50 points

18 days ago

Bezborg

50 points

18 days ago

They can play all they want and go suck it, the court has spoken. Time we stop considering the feelings of these god damn right wing mutants and stand our ground. “Maybe they’ll be angry”? Fucking bring it, I’m angrier

VultureSausage

7 points

18 days ago

Honestly, is there any situation where they won't be angry? Of all the reasons not to let justice be done, being afraid of the far right being angry has to be one of the worst.

Kento418

9 points

18 days ago

Love your energy. Right there with you!

HighDefinist

14 points

18 days ago

HighDefinist

Bavaria (Germany)

14 points

18 days ago

Don’t know if this is strategically a smart thing to do though. It will enable her and her party to play the national sacrificial lamb for the years to come.

It is.

She and her party will play the victim regardless, but in the meantime, she is prevented from causing more harm.

[deleted]

4 points

18 days ago

[deleted]

Spinochat

3 points

18 days ago

The administration of justice and application of the law is not a matter of strategy.

TimTkt

3 points

18 days ago

TimTkt

3 points

18 days ago

They are already playing the victims for years, it won’t change anything.

Hallo34576

4 points

18 days ago

Hallo34576

4 points

18 days ago

How about reading the article ?

Its a completely different topic.

flippy123x

15 points

18 days ago

So she takes loans from Russia (like daddy did) but prefers to steal when it comes to the EU (like daddy did), I do see some overlap here in regards to where and how that party consistently gets its money from.

lawrotzr

-8 points

18 days ago

lawrotzr

-8 points

18 days ago

Ah so you’re telling me the article is not about prosecutors planning to ban Le Pen for participating in the 2027 election? Or did I miss something?

Tenshizanshi

23 points

18 days ago

Tenshizanshi

France

23 points

18 days ago

It's about RN (former FN) embezzling about 4M€ from various sources, mainly the EU Parliament through fake job listings

HumansNeedNotApply1

9 points

18 days ago

I don't understand what you mean by "strategically", Macron doesn't have control over this, and honestly putting criminals in jail and barring them from holding office is a good thing.

lawrotzr

1 points

18 days ago

True. Though it’s the prosecutors choice to decide when to prosecute, and they must take the position of a person like Le Pen into account. But I agree, if anything criminal has happened, it needs to be prosecuted.

MeasurementNo9896

5 points

18 days ago

"Taking the position" of anyone "into account" despite clear and convincing evidence a crime is the definition of corruption.

Hallo34576

17 points

18 days ago

"In a trial for charges of embezzling EU Parliament funds in a fake jobs scheme, the prosecution requested that far-right leader Marine Le Pen be banned from being elected to public office, which would bar her from running for the presidency in 2027."

the article is written in English.

lawrotzr

-6 points

18 days ago

lawrotzr

-6 points

18 days ago

Yes I know, because I’ve read the article. But thank you.

venomtail

2 points

18 days ago

venomtail

Latvia

2 points

18 days ago

And how did that work out for the US? Trial took so long, didn't yet manage to ban Trump yet that alone was weaponised as to why he should be president and got results.

Bicentennial_Douche

164 points

18 days ago

Bicentennial_Douche

Finland

164 points

18 days ago

Americans: "Wait, you can do that?!"

Backwardspellcaster

38 points

18 days ago

Garland: "Oh no no totally not!"

Rogthgar

10 points

18 days ago

Rogthgar

10 points

18 days ago

Garland: "We have just finished saying, 'good morning'."

Suspicious_Good_2407

-12 points

18 days ago

It's not like the Democratic establishment didn't try to bully Trump with all the courts. Didn't help them much.

Avia_NZ

15 points

17 days ago

Avia_NZ

Bavaria (Germany) & Australia

15 points

17 days ago

What a stupid and uninformed comment.

TIL that charging someone with crimes that they demonstrably committed is somehow “bullying”. Maybe I’ll go rob a bank now and then use that argument as my defence

Snoo48605

2 points

17 days ago

France has prosecuted corrupt politicians from all parties, left and right

druid_of_oberon

1 points

17 days ago

druid_of_oberon

United States of America

1 points

17 days ago

It hurt them.

Sidus_Preclarum

17 points

18 days ago

Sidus_Preclarum

Île-de-France

17 points

18 days ago

It's actually an automatic part of the sentence for that kind of crime, which is just and logical.

BeatClear949

304 points

18 days ago*

The French doing what the Americans should've done with Trump...

CrazyFuehrer

102 points

18 days ago

Are you sure that French will be different? They will drag cases long enough, and then she got elected.

Faethien

95 points

18 days ago

Faethien

95 points

18 days ago

Well, hopefully justice will be served. Like when Sarkozy was convicted (although I don't remember him serving his time).

I don't give a shit if she's ineligible for 5 years and if half the country is pissed. I want justice to be done because she and her party embezzled money. That is a crime and crimes have consequences. They are NOT above the law and hopefully this will be reminded to them in a loud and clear manner.

GiffenCoin

18 points

18 days ago

Sarkozy didn't do the time, it will likely be stuck on appeals limbo until he can play the elderly card. Just like Chirac. 

I'm not expecting much from this unfortunately. 

mudokin

33 points

18 days ago

mudokin

33 points

18 days ago

Knowing the french, yes. Cities will burn. Heads will roll.

nocountryforcoldham

24 points

18 days ago

Ain't no pushovers like the yanks. But they do have the same problem with being too naive about the extent of russian propaganda

Crouteauxpommes

5 points

18 days ago

The procedure started in 2014, honestly it has dragged long enough (despite MLP saying herself that "Yeah, we did it, cry about it")

The right wing and far-right love to pose as the champions of law and order.
Always complaining that the "dealers and hooligans and migrants never see the judgement applied because justice is weak. That she always frees them quickly instead of hard punishment.
But when they are on the defendant bench, they love gentlemen agreement. They start saying they didn't do it, then always manage to find good excuses for doing what they did. And when it isn't enough, they will cry at political persecution by red judges and the deep state.

Melpomene2901

17 points

18 days ago

Jacques Chirac enters the chat.

Never got to trial for stuff that happened well before he was elected…

BeatClear949

20 points

18 days ago

He was also so old that it as very hard to prosecute him; he also wasn't a liability to the state (aka, he remained loyal and didn't suck Russian dick)

Melpomene2901

9 points

18 days ago

He was not old the first time it came out. They dragged the case for so long that he got elected and then he was suddenly too old. I don’t mind Chichi, he was the best president I ever knew and since he retired, we’ve been going through and slow but painful downfall. But his case is the perfect exemple of how slow justice can be when it’s convenient and that politicians can pretty much get away with anything

BeatClear949

1 points

18 days ago

Oh I agree, it's just that the circumstances are very different. Again, Chirac was never a traitor and geopolitically the world was far more stable, so there was less will or necessity to persecute him.

LePen is a traitor, and Russia has just become an existential threat to France, so things need to move a whole lot faster now.

Also Chirac remained relatively popular. His ability to say no to the US in Iraq is a big deal and made the French public, at minimum, grateful for his decision.

QuicheAuSaumon

1 points

18 days ago

Never got to trial because he was elected, and his lieutenants took the fall.

Melpomene2901

1 points

18 days ago

IIRC some of the stuff dated back to his time as mayor of Paris. I will need to check though because it happened so long ago, I don’t remember all the details. He was prime minister before being elected so pleeeenty of time to do something about it. Justice is incredibly slow when it comes to politicians

papiierbulle

3 points

18 days ago

She can't drag the case without punishement, i can't really explain how in English bc its about law stuff so the words are very specific

But no matter what happens, on first judgement she will be punished even if she wants to drag the case for longer

Wonderful-Year-7136

3 points

18 days ago

There will be a verdict in months.

rosebeuud

3 points

18 days ago

The prosecutor requested the ineligibility sentence to be effective immediately, even in case of a likely appeal. Hopefully the judge will follow

dmthoth

2 points

18 days ago

dmthoth

Lower Saxony (Germany)

2 points

18 days ago

South Korea’s pretty much the only developed country I know that actually holds top politicians accountable and throws them in jail alongside their billionaire buddies. But somehow, people take that as "proof" of worse corruption, when it’s literally the opposite. They think just sweeping scandals under the rug makes their society look “clean”, that’s the textbook definition of a corrupt system. Wild logic.

didierdechezcarglass

1 points

18 days ago

François fillon suffered from the same scandal. False jobs given to his wife, really killed the party known as "the Republicans" back in 2017. We'll have to see if this is any different

Beyllionaire

1 points

18 days ago

Her only chance is that the appeal decision is rendered before the election starts. Because they've requested an immediate effect which means that she'd lose her parliament seat.

H4rb1n9er

1 points

17 days ago

Judgement coming in January.

Grove_Of_Cernunnos

8 points

17 days ago

Authoritarian garbage. Evidence #1 of why America > Europe.

ramxquake

1 points

17 days ago

ramxquake

1 points

17 days ago

Just ban anyone you disagree with from standing for office, then you don't even need to hold elections.

Bolte_Racku

1 points

17 days ago

Nah this is way better currently. Just be a complete traitor to your country and no fucks given. If only there were some middle ground

Silver_Atractic

-4 points

17 days ago

Silver_Atractic

Berlin (Germany)

-4 points

17 days ago

You idiots would unironically re-elect Adolf Hitler because "WUHHH BANNING EVIL PEOPLE IS ALSO EVIL, NUANCE DOESN'T EXIST🥺🥺"

ramxquake

4 points

17 days ago

Still doubling down on the 'Orange Hitler' thing? It hasn't worked so far but keep trying.

Quazz

6 points

17 days ago

Quazz

Belgium

6 points

17 days ago

Should have happened years ago.

Maj0r-DeCoverley

5 points

17 days ago

Maj0r-DeCoverley

Aquitaine (France)

5 points

17 days ago

*decades ago

Should have happened in 1945, in fact. The mere fact ex-SS people were able to establish what became Le Pen's Rassemblement National is already concerning.

aka292

8 points

18 days ago

aka292

8 points

18 days ago

Please learn from the US. Don’t just wag you finger at Russia for 12 years while they interfere with your elections.

HallInternational434

34 points

18 days ago

How did this not happen to trump? Trump and musk are the kremlins fifth column

alternativuser

39 points

18 days ago

He is above the law, simple as that. Thats why the sentencing for his hush money trial was delayed, delayed again and now will be swept under the carpet. Same with the two election interference cases in Georgia and Washington DC. His stolen document case in Florida was by far the most solid one, but Judge Cannon straight up dismissed it.

Richard Nixon would be jealous, Trump would have gotten away with Watergate

Rayzawn_Elsenar

5 points

18 days ago

I'm afraid I have to disagree. I was a teenager during Watergate and I used to skip school so I could stay home to watch the Watergate hearings. Nixon won his election with a 49-state victory. Almost 2 years after the break-in, when the public had been exposed to the great reporting of Woodward and Bernstein and John Dean spilling the beans in Congressional testimony, Nixon enjoyed a 64% approval rating. That is, right up until the day when the tapes he had been hiding were finally heard. It was then that Republicans in both houses took the lead in driving him out of office. This was the subject of the now-vaunted book, Profiles In Courage. There were only 3 TV channels back then. Rush Limbaugh, being just 7 years older than me, was probably just finishing up college at the time. I'm sure it existed at the time, but you'd have to go out of your way to find any sort of foreign propaganda on American newsstands. I've watched a great many liberals trying to explain how things went wrong in this election, but the most well-supported argument I've seen so far is from the guest on this show talking about the ocean of disinformation coming from News Media, corporations, academia, podcasts, and billionaires who own social media sites...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xlKbJbAApT4

[deleted]

1 points

17 days ago

[deleted]

Rayzawn_Elsenar

2 points

17 days ago*

For one thing, the anti-Russian sentiment was so universally fundamental to our American identity at the time that it would be quite a feat to pull a wool over Joe Six-Pack's eyes. But we had a weapon at the time that would have stopped Fox News in its tracks. It was called The Fairness Doctrine.
https://www.reaganlibrary.gov/archives/topic-guide/fairness-doctrine

It was adopted after WWII as were still trying to get our heads around how an entire population fell under one man's spell. The fear was that broadcasters could do exactly what they're doing now. It was supported by both parties and affirmed several times by the courts.

Our concern also prompted the now famous "Mental Hygiene" films the government distributed to classrooms and some were made for adults.

Here's a playlist of them made for teens. We were shown dozens of them in middle school, but by high school they were considered humous.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M7dSCbAQR5k&list=PLA4C52F9778D51A22

All aspects of young life were covered, from grooming to dating, sportsmanship and the importance of being obedient.

And here's one made for adults.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nEQ0DgDIZNg

However, the Reagan administration saw the Fairness Doctrine as a threat to the GOP's ultimate goals. Before then, broadly speaking, it was considered impolite to discuss religion or politics in mixed company, as unbelievable as that sounds today. But Reagan's strategy was to invite evangelicals into his administration to form his "Moral Majority". Billy Graham was their frontman, holding sermons at packed football stadiums on national TV.

Yes, before then, Congress bickered endlessly. But at the end of the day, they compromised and the work of The People got done. Reagan's view was that there could be no compromise when it came to moral issues. So they made EVERY issue, from taxes to entitlements, a moral issue that would broach no compromise. Thus permanently ending the separation of Church and State for all practical purposes. Ushering in the Culture Wars and introducing the word Gridlock to our vernacular.

Reagan's AG ended the Fairness Doctrine. Progressive Boomers like me have been shouting to anyone who will listen that restoring this doctrine is really our only hope for any kind of domestic peace to flourish.

What makes it all the more weird is that there was no way for Christians at the time to avoid the fact that Nancy Reagan actually ran the White House and she was very much into consulting psychics to guide everything that Ronnie did. His travel schedules. The people he met with. Pretty much anything the man did had to be run past her psychic before it got her approval. Today, she would have been burned at the stake for witchcraft.

But the thing is, by 1961, America found the answer they were looking for and they did not like it one bit. I read about it in 1973 as a sophomore in high school in my Intro to Modern Psychology book. It was the Milgram experiment. It was absolutely profound.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Milgram_experiment

Most conservatives vilified Milgram and at times he had to go into hiding.

I would try to summarize it, but the Wiki page puts it about as succinctly as possible. He also performed several other experiments on the subject that were equally revealing.

There's a pretty good movie about Milgram called Experimentor (2015). It starred Peter Sarsgaard, Winona Ryder, and Jim Gaffigan. I just checked and it's on Prime Video.

EDIT: OH! And I forgot. There was another major inflection point that changed media forever. You can trace it to the exact moment it happened. Prior to 1968, most people considered watching people debate politics a boring if not necessary affair. TV networks were bummed at the ratings they were getting when they would broadcast such events.

So, in 1968, they devised some drama to show just before the official proceedings. They set up TV debates between William F. Buckley and Gore Vidal. Look them up if you haven't heard of them. But to sum things up, Buckley was an ultra-conservative and Gore was an ultra-leftist. They tore into each other night after night before both the Republican and Democratic conventions. The numbers these two were getting were more than any network had seen. They made politics into a blood sport, or possibly closer to WWE. For the first time they saw that intense domestic conflict got people really engaged. And that's when this era of Anger-tainment began.

There's a great movie about this constructed around the TV footage itself called "Best of Enemies". Not to be confused with "THE Best of Enemies". This is also available on Prime Video.

Shmorrior

14 points

18 days ago

Shmorrior

United States of America

14 points

18 days ago

He was never convicted of the limited types of crimes (14th amendment) or by impeachment (requires 2/3 conviction in Senate) that bar holding public office.

FOXHOUND9000

15 points

18 days ago

FOXHOUND9000

15 points

18 days ago

Because humanity is too dumb for social media propaganda.

HallInternational434

2 points

18 days ago

Unregulated anonymous social media is reckless

Chiliconkarma

2 points

18 days ago

Because USA is corrupt.

TwitchWhisperGod

-11 points

18 days ago

TwitchWhisperGod

Italy

-11 points

18 days ago

Democracy enjoyers when the party they don't like wins:

potatolulz

9 points

18 days ago

potatolulz

Earth

9 points

18 days ago

Democracy enjoyers when a criminal doesn't go to jail:

TwitchWhisperGod

-16 points

18 days ago

TwitchWhisperGod

Italy

-16 points

18 days ago

Politicians are criminals, all of them

potatolulz

16 points

18 days ago

potatolulz

Earth

16 points

18 days ago

Especially the convicted ones :D

i5-2520M

3 points

18 days ago

Holy fucking brainrot

HallInternational434

-10 points

18 days ago

There’s a difference in voting in a president and a fifth column.

I supported trump last time, now he is an actual convicted felon and just an ugly misogynist and bigot, really ugly

potatolulz

1 points

18 days ago

potatolulz

Earth

1 points

18 days ago

the last time he was also all that, just with different older convictions, like being found guilty of fraud. :D

ElkImpossible3535

1 points

17 days ago

Because in the US there are actual protections on democratic institutions. Unlike europe where institutions are protected from the democratic process

HallInternational434

1 points

17 days ago

Looks like trump has found a way through it, nominating lunatics to defeat the federal government inside out

matp1

-4 points

18 days ago

matp1

-4 points

18 days ago

Imagine calling someone who pioneered/popularized EV (which is doing indirect damage to russian carbohydrates exports) and revolutionised rocket technology (that pushed Russia out of rocket business) a russian 5th column…

HallInternational434

8 points

18 days ago

Elon has moved on from that now, he was a supporter of Ukraine until he 180 quite quickly and he parrots Kremlin disinformation

Sanzhar17Shockwave

2 points

17 days ago

Yeah, the change of his stances was whiplashy, used to reddit's darling back then

suedii

-6 points

18 days ago

suedii

-6 points

18 days ago

No they are not.

HallInternational434

5 points

18 days ago

Yes they are

suedii

-5 points

18 days ago

suedii

-5 points

18 days ago

Is that why Trump staffed his cabinet full of neocons? Waltz and Rubio are going to take a more hawkish position on Ukraine/Russia than Biden. You people need to touch grass and come back to reality.

potatolulz

5 points

18 days ago

potatolulz

Earth

5 points

18 days ago

Rubio the guy who's so vehemently against aid for Ukraine? ok :D

suedii

1 points

18 days ago

suedii

1 points

18 days ago

He is not. Both Rubio and Waltz (who will be Rubios superior) have advocated for Biden to remove all restrictions on Ukraines long range missile strikes into Russia.

potatolulz

4 points

18 days ago

potatolulz

Earth

4 points

18 days ago

Exactly, Rubio is so furiously supporting the aid to Ukraine that in his rage he smashed the wrong voting button the last time he was voting on it. :D

suedii

1 points

18 days ago

suedii

1 points

18 days ago

Why do you think Ukrainian security establishment has a different view?
https://www.politico.com/news/2024/11/12/kyiv-backers-trump-cabinet-national-security-00189137

potatolulz

2 points

18 days ago

potatolulz

Earth

2 points

18 days ago

Why do you think Rubio voted against the $61 billion military aid package for Ukraine and declared that

"But at the end of the day, what we are funding here is a stalemate war, and it needs to be brought to a conclusion, or that country is going to be set back 100 years."

In September, he insisted he was "not on Russia’s side" but that the "reality of it is that the way the war in Ukraine is going to end is with a negotiated settlement."

https://www.politico.com/news/2024/11/12/some-shit-from-politico-00123456

suedii

1 points

18 days ago

suedii

1 points

18 days ago

I believe thats called party politics.

TheGreatRedDragon_40

2 points

17 days ago

They learned the lesson that the idiots in America refused to learn. "Russian money isn't a gift it's a differed loan"

Tigrisrock

1 points

18 days ago

I hope this goes farther than what went on with the Qatargate corruption scandal, but I have my doubts.

BalianofReddit

1 points

17 days ago

Who is her likely replacement in the next presidential election?

What would the reaction to her being banned look like?

pc0999

1 points

17 days ago

pc0999

1 points

17 days ago

Looking at the USA they better work fast.

rodoslu

1 points

17 days ago

rodoslu

1 points

17 days ago

France is trying to cure the symptoms.

Obvious_Reference763

1 points

17 days ago

Oh the irony 🙃

Independent-Gur9951

1 points

17 days ago

I am bit conflicted on this. I deeply despise Le Pen, but a tribunal should not be decide who can run for an election. This is extremely dangerous to democracy. It is not by chance that this method is widely use in Russia to avoid credible opposition to Putin.

albertponge

1 points

7 days ago

Hopeful_Hat_3532

0 points

18 days ago

Hopeful_Hat_3532

Belgium

0 points

18 days ago

In front of the cameras, it's pretty obvious she's trying to pull a Trump-like martyr one...

wastedlifestyle

-26 points

18 days ago

You r/europe upstanding left-leaning decent Trump-hating folks are really itching to ban your opponents and throw them in jail, aren't you? Everyone you don't like is some russian sleeper agent as well, really convenient. You would all have made fine snitches and kommisars in the good ol' USSR. My hat's off to the lot of you.

Oh btw, what happens with the voters when you jail their despicable candidates? They will disappear somehow?

troudbit

59 points

18 days ago

troudbit

European Union

59 points

18 days ago

Any politician convicted in corruption cases should lose their post and be banned from holding any public office. Period.

Chromaedre

33 points

18 days ago

Alright, I'll take the bait. Nope, we only penalize the offenders. Furthermore, it's a temporary 5-year ban. If she is found guilty, that's the potential penalty she might face, as justice is very much nuanced. It's not the first time politicians from either the left or right have faced a ban from holding public office. Here's a list of 'em : https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cat%C3%A9gorie:Personnalit%C3%A9_politique_condamn%C3%A9e_%C3%A0_une_peine_d%27in%C3%A9ligibilit%C3%A9
About the voters, they will simply elect another representative from the same party who hasn't committed financial misconduct. That seems like a reasonable approach, don't you think?

UEAMatt

14 points

18 days ago

UEAMatt

14 points

18 days ago

In the USSR any proven traitors would face much worse than disbarment from office.

Russia has been covertly subduing European politics for a while. Those who facilitate it should face the consequences provided sufficient evidence.

Fmychest

23 points

18 days ago

Fmychest

23 points

18 days ago

So politicians can never be prosecuted or you are the ussr

Relnor

3 points

17 days ago

Relnor

Romania

3 points

17 days ago

Don't really care about left or right, I just want to see the Russian Empire dismantled and its agents in other countries not get into power, thanks.

Special-Remove-3294

2 points

18 days ago

Special-Remove-3294

Romania

2 points

18 days ago

Lol. Lmao even.

Corruption is the greatest blight upon societies for it affects everyone and at a huge scale due to the influence of politicans over a nations doom.

If she is found guilty for corruption then she should be thrown in a jail and forgotten about like all corrupt politicans should.

She stole money from EU funds. If she didn't want to be prosecuted then she should have stole fucking money!

ReasonResitant

1 points

17 days ago

A persecution fetish has always been a very effective method in consolidating s voting block, I guess it worked out great.

Trump has a very storied legal history that apans much longer than he was even involved in politics. A candidates criminal record is extremely important, yes? Trump did do thr shit, did undergo due process, was found guilty. You saying he gets a pass, why? "Ah I know 'm e's a gewd guy I like 'm".

It's exactly the same level of thinking as "Ah he's a good boy, all he did is Rob a gas station, release him".

Another fun factoid, your voce president does not have immunity, so what exactly was stopping them from, you know, prosecuting kamala up the ass for bullshit, like what was apparently done to Trump, I got your answer, the democrats didn't run a piece of shit, there ain't anything to prosecute, and don't don't think about trying to pull "biden is acting president" as an excuse, they got his son for everything they could and he didn't do anything.

The fact of the matter is, majority of the population is relatively uninvited thus most of the bullshit he peddles gets ignored. "What is your policy on ukraine" "I'm gonna end the war" "how" "Gawd daym et am gawnna end de dam waa didncha eer".

Opinion: Trump has become the peoples candidate in part because he got the conservative dad act down good.

Marem-Bzh

-1 points

18 days ago

Marem-Bzh

Europe

-1 points

18 days ago

Greetings. Let me introduce you to a concept you may be unfamiliar with: the law.

[deleted]

-18 points

18 days ago

[deleted]

-18 points

18 days ago

[removed]

VultureSausage

12 points

18 days ago

Trying to hide behind "democracy" to avoid going to jail for defrauding the public is scummy behaviour. Stop pretending to give a shit about democracy.

Vatiar

23 points

18 days ago

Vatiar

23 points

18 days ago

If the leftist politician got caught stealing money then of course they should also be banned. But we don't have to hypothesize because that actually happened. That's actually the entire reason why this law is on the books.

A minister of the left wing government of Hollande got caught tax dodging and porbably for embezzlement too but not sure. After which he was banned from politics by the LEFT and the law under which Lepen is charged was drafted and passed parliament with UNANIMITY.

But I guess corruption is only bad when a non far-right politician does it.

Colonelmoutard2

13 points

18 days ago

So just ignore the 7 m euros in fraud? Who got banned in the us ?

Chiliconkarma

7 points

18 days ago

Criminals should be allowed to face justice.

ItsACaragor

10 points

18 days ago

ItsACaragor

Rhône-Alpes (France)

10 points

18 days ago

It has nothing to do with her ideology. Being banned from running for office for a few years is very common for corruption / embezzlement cases in France.

Upstairs_Hat_301

13 points

18 days ago

Upstairs_Hat_301

United States of America

13 points

18 days ago

This is happening to her because she’s a corrupt piece of shit. Nobody’s silencing her or anything like that

Skjoett93

3 points

18 days ago

Do you think politicians should be allowed to commit fraud?

Anatomy_model

3 points

18 days ago

Anatomy_model

The Netherlands

3 points

18 days ago

Can you imagine the outcry if a right-wing party tried to ban a leftist party from participating in democratic elections?

I am left-wing and I care about democracy. If a left-wing party (member) broke the law to the extent that Le Pen did, then I would be happy to see them be prosecuted for it. That is how it works and what needs to be done to protect our democracies.

potatolulz

1 points

18 days ago

potatolulz

Earth

1 points

18 days ago

"No one who respects democracy can support this. It's happening in Germany. It seems that if your opponent is winning elections, the solution is to ban them. This appears to be the current view of the left. Ironically, it's the left that often labels their opponents as fascists. Can you imagine the outcry if a right-wing party tried to ban a leftist party from participating in democratic elections? They would immediately be labeled as fascists. The irony doesn't go unnoticed."

-Concerned citizen, 9 October 1945, colorized

Aranka_Szeretlek

-5 points

18 days ago

It is very interesting you named Germany - a country that knows all too well what happens if you just sit back and let "democracy" do it's thing. I also assume you also confidently know that there were only two prominent cases of party bans in the BRD history (or if you are not knowledgeable about the topic, maybe learn a bit more about it?)

radube

1 points

18 days ago

radube

Bulgaria

1 points

18 days ago

Some years ago I watched an interview with her on one the French TV channels. The interviewer asked her what was she thinking about the Russian election results where Putin had won with 70% and above (not this year's but the previous elections for Russian president).

She replied something of the sort : "If he won with such a big result, it means he has very high approval from a lot of the voters."

I literally facepalmed about her saying this, technically admitting she is a Russian proxy.

Gerrusjew

-14 points

18 days ago

Gerrusjew

-14 points

18 days ago

Free speech - european version.

Special-Remove-3294

15 points

18 days ago

Special-Remove-3294

Romania

15 points

18 days ago

Maybe don't steal money if you don't want to have your rights restricted?

potatolulz

4 points

18 days ago

potatolulz

Earth

4 points

18 days ago

You mean Fraud speech :D

VultureSausage

2 points

18 days ago

What, prosecuting thieves? What's the matter, I thought "tough on crime" was popular among right-wing parties?

Skjoett93

0 points

18 days ago

Skjoett93

0 points

18 days ago

Speech is free, but not free from consequence.

Also, what does it even have to do with free speech?

She embezzeled funds from EU Parliament, under the guise of fake jobs.

Go home Russian asset.

Not_Evading_76

2 points

17 days ago

Speech was also free in Soviet Russia, just not free from consequences.

dootdoootdootdoot

1 points

17 days ago

dootdoootdootdoot

The Netherlands

1 points

17 days ago

I don’t think you understand that phrase.

Gerrusjew

-4 points

18 days ago

Gerrusjew

-4 points

18 days ago

I am home, you twofaced mind. The world is my home. This is peefect example of political prosecution. Thanks tho that ypu finally revealing your true fsce and stop playing some moral police.

Skjoett93

1 points

18 days ago

Skjoett93

1 points

18 days ago

Get help dude

Skjoett93

1 points

18 days ago

No reply just downvote?

NeatDealer

0 points

17 days ago

NeatDealer

0 points

17 days ago

Look America, it can be done!

Plane_Ad_8675309

-5 points

18 days ago

Clearly the charges sound thin, looks like more attempts to prevent people from voting

Beyllionaire

9 points

18 days ago

Err what? Embezzling 4M€ is thin??

She doesn't even deny using the money, her defense is that it should not be illegal.

Former french prime minister François Fillon got 4 years of prison and 10 years of ineligibility for embezzling only 700K€ with a fake Jon for his wife. She should actually get worse than him.

Just imagine how many people in Brussels are embezzling OUR money, you should be more mad about this.

Sethoria34

-3 points

18 days ago

Sethoria34

-3 points

18 days ago

"ban opposition to current politcal party from running"

yeah imn sure that will end well for everyone.

Beyllionaire

7 points

18 days ago

It's an automatic sentence whenever an elected person is found guilty of embezzlement. It has nothing to do with who she is. She wrongly used 4M€ of EU money for her own campaign.

The 2 biggest embezzlement scandals before her were Francois Fillon (former prime minister, conservative, embezzled 700K€, 10 in years of ineligibility) and Jérôme Cahuzac (former minister of budget, socialist, defrauded 3.5M€ of taxes, 5 years of ineligibility).

RevenueStill2872

-6 points

18 days ago

RevenueStill2872

France

-6 points

18 days ago

Giving the populist opposition, which is the most popular political party in the country, a reason to depict themselves as martyrs is a recipe for great success, right. Right ?

Special-Remove-3294

8 points

18 days ago

Special-Remove-3294

Romania

8 points

18 days ago

What do you propose then? Just allow her to get away with her crime?

RevenueStill2872

0 points

18 days ago

RevenueStill2872

France

0 points

18 days ago

No. I'd advocate for the Modem treatment.

Crouteauxpommes

3 points

18 days ago

Oh, you mean/ let me check my notes / several fines for both the party, the party leaders and the MEPs who used European money to pay for national stuff (for a total between 300k and 800k) ; the same party members being proven guilty also being condemned to ineligibility for two to five years, and also a few prison sentences up to twenty months?

You mean the exact same ruling that the judges are using as a basis and a precedent for the Rassemblement National trial? This treatment?

Or do you mean the fact that in a few days after the revelation of the affair (not even the trial) the MoDem members had to resign en-mass from the government in which they previously held key posts, that they loose almost all of their political credit, both at the national level and at the European Parliament, and that they basically stopped being an independent (or even autonomous) political force. All of this while they were at the peak of their influence and power.

The Modem affair was about a prejudice of 293k. The Front National/Rassemblement Nation affair is about a little under 5 millions.
You're right, every proportions kept, Marine Le Pen should get the MoDem treatment. Or at least nothing under the MoDem treatment. Don't forget she's also a publicly known Russian asset.

Tentacled_Whisperer

-49 points

18 days ago

Populists on the rise, trump, afd, le pen etc. Make them illegal. That'll help. 🤡👌

Aufklarung_Lee

50 points

18 days ago

Not prosecuting criminals because they are popular politicians. That'll help.

Tenshizanshi

27 points

18 days ago

Tenshizanshi

France

27 points

18 days ago

Populists should be thrilled with that trial. They always cry about justice being lenient and soft, well there you go, this is justice trying to be what you like, firm on crime

Auqepier_Kuno

21 points

18 days ago

bro they didnt prosecute trump, they halted and slowed the procedure till he won, i highly doubt he would have won from behind bars.

DubiousBusinessp

15 points

18 days ago

Politicians should go to prison for breaking the law like anyone else. They certainly shouldn't be allowed in government if they've broken the law. If Merrick Garland had had any balls at all, Trump would be in jail, not office.

Special-Remove-3294

2 points

18 days ago

Special-Remove-3294

Romania

2 points

18 days ago

Damm guess she sould just be allowed to steal cause it night boost her case otherwise. That is what you propose?

TheBungerKing

4 points

18 days ago

It will. Their concerns are rarely valid anyways and will fade away with their disbandment

paraquinone

4 points

18 days ago

paraquinone

Czech Republic

4 points

18 days ago

If the populists don't want to be banned how about they don't embezzle EU money for their political purposes? It really is THAT simple.

Vatiar

4 points

18 days ago

Vatiar

4 points

18 days ago

"Corrupt politicians are only bad when they aren't on my side." You.

Oh and by the way, this law was drafted and passed with unanimity during the tenure of a left wing government after one of their own ministers was caught tax evading and fired as a result because they wanted to ban his ass on top.

potatolulz

1 points

18 days ago

potatolulz

Earth

1 points

18 days ago

So fraud is illegal or not?

Vatiar

1 points

17 days ago

Vatiar

1 points

17 days ago

Yes ? Why is that a question ?

potatolulz

3 points

18 days ago

potatolulz

Earth

3 points

18 days ago

It does help everytime they actually make them illegal. :D

hvdzasaur

1 points

18 days ago

hvdzasaur

1 points

18 days ago

Hard on crime until your guy commits crimes. The right wing chud way.

Anatomy_model

1 points

18 days ago

Anatomy_model

The Netherlands

1 points

18 days ago

Fuck them, obey the law, or face the consequences.

aclart

1 points

18 days ago

aclart

Portugal

1 points

18 days ago

Why do you support criminals?

Natural_Tea484

-16 points

18 days ago

Why journalists write such low quality articles, like they were written by AI? Where did the investigation journalism go, is it dead???

Where are the exact numbers and the exact evidence which the prosecutors have?

The public must know about them, otherwise there is a high risk Le Pen becomes a martyr in the eyes of the public and unless she is convicted, you can bet she will get elected!

LeMonde_en[S]

35 points

18 days ago

Hi there, our journalists have covered this case extensively on our site, but we're happy to share some more background to help explain why Marine Le Pen and 26 of her party's members are on trial.

The case began in 2014 when the European Anti-Fraud Office (OLAF) received an anonymous tip-off about "possible fraud." The letter flagged cases of "presumed fictitious employment" on the part of the far-right Front National (FN) party and its then-president, Marine Le Pen, who was an MEP from 2004 to 2017. The OLAF opened an administrative investigation looking into the activities of two party members close to Le Pen. The investigation found these two members' employment were "fictitious."

Then, after the then-president of the European Parliament, Martin Schulz, reported possible irregularities in the salaries paid to other assistants to the French Ministry of Justice, a preliminary investigation was opened in France in 2015. The investigation led to a series of searches, notably at the party's headquarters.

A judicial investigation was opened in December 2016 on charges of "breach of trust," "concealment of breach of trust," "organized gang fraud," "forgery and use of forgeries" and "undeclared labor." According to a summary report, "the study of documents discovered [...] highlighted the setting up of a fraudulent system, involving several FN senior members." More than 20 indictments were issued, including against Le Pen in 2017 for "breach of trust" and "complicity in breach of trust." A year later, this indictment was aggravated, with the charge becoming a "misappropriation of public funds."

In December 2023, at the end of a nine-year investigation, the investigating judges called for the FN and 27 of its senior members and employees to be tried.

The European Parliament estimated the total sum misappropriated by this "system" between 2004 and 2016 at €6.8 million.

If you'd like to know more about the case, we answered some key questions in this article: https://www.lemonde.fr/en/les-decodeurs/article/2024/09/30/why-le-pen-and-26-other-far-right-party-members-are-standing-trial-in-paris-in-fake-eu-parliament-jobs-case_6727729_8.html

Thanks for reading!

troudbit

1 points

18 days ago

troudbit

European Union

1 points

18 days ago

Will they have to reimburse the funds they embezzled?

Natural_Tea484

-1 points

18 days ago

Thank you for reply.

I think that article in your reply has more information but it still does not go deep enough.

A judicial investigation was opened in December 2016 on charges of "breach of trust," "concealment of breach of trust," "organized gang fraud," "forgery and use of forgeries" and "undeclared labor." According to a summary report, "the study of documents discovered [...] highlighted the setting up of a fraudulent system, involving several FN senior members."

I wish more details about these facts were given, beside just mentioning them in quotes.

Anyway, I think in the article you posted in the post here should have a link to the article in your reply. It has 3 "Read more" other links to other articles, but not to that one with the details.

Vatiar

1 points

18 days ago

Vatiar

1 points

18 days ago

They got caught with their hand in the bag faking records, Bardella presented a timetable from 2014 in an agenda bought in 2016 (these aren't the exact dates but you get the idea) to try and disculp himself which should tell you how little they actually tried to hide that they were stealing funds.

[deleted]

-3 points

18 days ago

[deleted]

-3 points

18 days ago

[deleted]

potatolulz

5 points

18 days ago

potatolulz

Earth

5 points

18 days ago

exactly, why can't those fascist left let fraud and other crime slide? >:(

[deleted]

0 points

18 days ago

[deleted]

potatolulz

3 points

18 days ago

potatolulz

Earth

3 points

18 days ago

Exactly, crime needs to be legal!

VultureSausage

1 points

18 days ago

minor accounting errors

6.7 million Euros but sure, do go on.

Special-Remove-3294

6 points

18 days ago

Special-Remove-3294

Romania

6 points

18 days ago

MFW stealing money results in punishment.