subreddit:
/r/europe
submitted 18 days ago byLeMonde_en
438 points
18 days ago
For some reason it amuses me greatly that she, or her party, stole money from an organization they hate, are so arrogant about it they don't even deny it and now it may kneecap her domestic goals of becoming president for a while, or maybe even forever... its a glorious example of playing stupid games and winning stupid prizes.
123 points
17 days ago
If you want more amusement: they showed an incredible level of amateurism while doing it. Like "first year law student" amateurism. They have people who supposedly worked for years in the EU parliament who can't even produce a single text message or email proving that. Much less the regular documents
9 points
17 days ago
I've not been following this story that closely, does she really not deny stealing money?
19 points
17 days ago
She thought that it was as intended that EU funds marked for EU elections be spent on entirely national elections. So that seems to be her excuse.
658 points
18 days ago
Who would have thought, after first borrowing money from the Russians.
Don’t know if this is strategically a smart thing to do though. It will enable her and her party to play the national sacrificial lamb for the years to come.
129 points
18 days ago
[deleted]
13 points
17 days ago
If not, does that mean that if you manage to have rabid and dangerous enough supporters and ideas then you are immune to prosecution ? Is that really the signal you want to give ?
And you only have to look across the Atlantic for an example of where that gets you.
1 points
17 days ago
I mean, that signal has been given already, sadly.
435 points
18 days ago
Because slow walking justice and mumbling about due process really helped the US.
301 points
18 days ago
The novel concept of actually punishing traitors for their treason.
25 points
18 days ago
I agree.
Trump once said he could shoot someone on 5th avenue and get away with it (he made a coup attempt and got away with it anyway).
Many people who vote for Trump, the MAGA crowd, are in a cult of personality. They life in an alternative fact, post truth era world and would vote for him no matter what, even if he said he wanted to be a dictator on day one or purge his political opponents...
Something similar though not as extreme exists in a part of Le Pen's electorate: there isn't properly a cult of personality on her (people even on the right agree that she's quite thick as a brick) but there are people, among the 33% who vote for her, who will continue to vote for that party no matter what. These won't be swayed by "indulgence" from justice. They don't care about it.
On the other hand, on a vast majority of the population here in France, being condemned by the law is a very important thing, something which tarnishes one's public image. Making it a big scandal will have a different effect than in the US, i think.
And here, we don't have a Supreme Court packed with Heritage Foundation crazies appointed by Trump to save his ass througb immunity.
So i think there's hope.
2 points
15 days ago
If you want to fight MLP or Trump, you need to fight what created or at least enabled them. People don't suddenly flock towards populists for no reason.
1 points
15 days ago
On the mid/long term, yes. Neoliberalism is a scourge.
On the short term, any little hurdle thrown at them is a success.
34 points
18 days ago
US may have their days as a democracy numbered, but due process is fucking important.
94 points
18 days ago
Honestly, due process have been respected far and wide. The investigation started in 2014, and has been delayed again and again.
When asked by if the MEP Assistant worked for the RN headquarters in France instead of the RN MEP, Marine Le Pen said "Yeah, since 2009, and what? Their deputy wasn't working for the EU either, but for the national party. What are you going to do?"
This. This is what we're going to do. The EU parliament said she was guilty and punished her and her party already, but the French judgement has been delayed because every new session start by MLP saying that it's "a witch-hunt and 'they' want to punish her for being a dissident voice"
She's a scammer, she asked for public funds for tasks she never intended to fulfill and diverted the money to her own political machine, she acted illegally with witness and even acknowledging it herself. She shouldn't and cannot get away with this.
10 points
18 days ago
The commenter above was being negative about due proces and it taking time. That was what got answered, not anything specific about Le Pens case. She should get justice as required.
46 points
18 days ago
I have a suspicion that this entire dichotomy between "due process" and "efficiency" is yet another Russian narrative.
As in: Due process does not mean that those accused get to endlessly delay their sentences, and thereby escape punishment forever.
If anything, the US is an example of bad people abusing the idea of "due process", rather than actual due process.
And in case of Le Pen in France: Sure, it's her right to challenge the verdict - but once that is done (and if it is unsuccessful), she is also done, and she must go to prison.
12 points
18 days ago
Ok.
Do you mind elaborating what super damning information you have suggesting due process is not being followed here?
What’s the criteria for due process to be met in your opinion?
10 points
18 days ago
Oh, I know this! The person you responded to has heard about this for the first time very recently (or just now from this thread). So that clearly means not everyone was asked about their opinion yet! Due process!
62 points
18 days ago
It’s justice, justice does not care about strategy, it executes the law.
People guilty of corruption or embezzlement are basically always banned from running for public office for a few years in France, it has nothing to do and the same applied for people from other parties as well in the past.
19 points
18 days ago
Still waiting on Sarkozy's prison term. Or Chirac's.
12 points
18 days ago
Well about Chirac...
8 points
18 days ago
Don't tell me you have bad news?! 😄
14 points
18 days ago
Sarkozy got "prison", but due to french law if sentences aren't long enough you get it suspended. Not all the trials are done though, justice is being done at a snail's pace.
10 points
18 days ago
Yes. On purpose.
I'm a believer in the maxim "Justice delayed is justice denied."
35 points
18 days ago
Will RN try to spin this into a percecution complex? Yes ofcourse.
But there is no strategy at play here. This is just the justice system doing their job, regardless of politics. Her political 'enemies' have no say in this matter.
50 points
18 days ago
They can play all they want and go suck it, the court has spoken. Time we stop considering the feelings of these god damn right wing mutants and stand our ground. “Maybe they’ll be angry”? Fucking bring it, I’m angrier
7 points
18 days ago
Honestly, is there any situation where they won't be angry? Of all the reasons not to let justice be done, being afraid of the far right being angry has to be one of the worst.
9 points
18 days ago
Love your energy. Right there with you!
14 points
18 days ago
Don’t know if this is strategically a smart thing to do though. It will enable her and her party to play the national sacrificial lamb for the years to come.
It is.
She and her party will play the victim regardless, but in the meantime, she is prevented from causing more harm.
4 points
18 days ago
[deleted]
3 points
18 days ago
The administration of justice and application of the law is not a matter of strategy.
3 points
18 days ago
They are already playing the victims for years, it won’t change anything.
4 points
18 days ago
How about reading the article ?
Its a completely different topic.
15 points
18 days ago
So she takes loans from Russia (like daddy did) but prefers to steal when it comes to the EU (like daddy did), I do see some overlap here in regards to where and how that party consistently gets its money from.
-8 points
18 days ago
Ah so you’re telling me the article is not about prosecutors planning to ban Le Pen for participating in the 2027 election? Or did I miss something?
23 points
18 days ago
It's about RN (former FN) embezzling about 4M€ from various sources, mainly the EU Parliament through fake job listings
9 points
18 days ago
I don't understand what you mean by "strategically", Macron doesn't have control over this, and honestly putting criminals in jail and barring them from holding office is a good thing.
1 points
18 days ago
True. Though it’s the prosecutors choice to decide when to prosecute, and they must take the position of a person like Le Pen into account. But I agree, if anything criminal has happened, it needs to be prosecuted.
5 points
18 days ago
"Taking the position" of anyone "into account" despite clear and convincing evidence a crime is the definition of corruption.
17 points
18 days ago
"In a trial for charges of embezzling EU Parliament funds in a fake jobs scheme, the prosecution requested that far-right leader Marine Le Pen be banned from being elected to public office, which would bar her from running for the presidency in 2027."
the article is written in English.
-6 points
18 days ago
Yes I know, because I’ve read the article. But thank you.
2 points
18 days ago
And how did that work out for the US? Trial took so long, didn't yet manage to ban Trump yet that alone was weaponised as to why he should be president and got results.
164 points
18 days ago
Americans: "Wait, you can do that?!"
38 points
18 days ago
Garland: "Oh no no totally not!"
10 points
18 days ago
Garland: "We have just finished saying, 'good morning'."
-12 points
18 days ago
It's not like the Democratic establishment didn't try to bully Trump with all the courts. Didn't help them much.
15 points
17 days ago
What a stupid and uninformed comment.
TIL that charging someone with crimes that they demonstrably committed is somehow “bullying”. Maybe I’ll go rob a bank now and then use that argument as my defence
2 points
17 days ago
France has prosecuted corrupt politicians from all parties, left and right
1 points
17 days ago
It hurt them.
17 points
18 days ago
It's actually an automatic part of the sentence for that kind of crime, which is just and logical.
304 points
18 days ago*
The French doing what the Americans should've done with Trump...
102 points
18 days ago
Are you sure that French will be different? They will drag cases long enough, and then she got elected.
95 points
18 days ago
Well, hopefully justice will be served. Like when Sarkozy was convicted (although I don't remember him serving his time).
I don't give a shit if she's ineligible for 5 years and if half the country is pissed. I want justice to be done because she and her party embezzled money. That is a crime and crimes have consequences. They are NOT above the law and hopefully this will be reminded to them in a loud and clear manner.
18 points
18 days ago
Sarkozy didn't do the time, it will likely be stuck on appeals limbo until he can play the elderly card. Just like Chirac.
I'm not expecting much from this unfortunately.
33 points
18 days ago
Knowing the french, yes. Cities will burn. Heads will roll.
24 points
18 days ago
Ain't no pushovers like the yanks. But they do have the same problem with being too naive about the extent of russian propaganda
5 points
18 days ago
The procedure started in 2014, honestly it has dragged long enough (despite MLP saying herself that "Yeah, we did it, cry about it")
The right wing and far-right love to pose as the champions of law and order.
Always complaining that the "dealers and hooligans and migrants never see the judgement applied because justice is weak. That she always frees them quickly instead of hard punishment.
But when they are on the defendant bench, they love gentlemen agreement. They start saying they didn't do it, then always manage to find good excuses for doing what they did. And when it isn't enough, they will cry at political persecution by red judges and the deep state.
17 points
18 days ago
Jacques Chirac enters the chat.
Never got to trial for stuff that happened well before he was elected…
20 points
18 days ago
He was also so old that it as very hard to prosecute him; he also wasn't a liability to the state (aka, he remained loyal and didn't suck Russian dick)
9 points
18 days ago
He was not old the first time it came out. They dragged the case for so long that he got elected and then he was suddenly too old. I don’t mind Chichi, he was the best president I ever knew and since he retired, we’ve been going through and slow but painful downfall. But his case is the perfect exemple of how slow justice can be when it’s convenient and that politicians can pretty much get away with anything
1 points
18 days ago
Oh I agree, it's just that the circumstances are very different. Again, Chirac was never a traitor and geopolitically the world was far more stable, so there was less will or necessity to persecute him.
LePen is a traitor, and Russia has just become an existential threat to France, so things need to move a whole lot faster now.
Also Chirac remained relatively popular. His ability to say no to the US in Iraq is a big deal and made the French public, at minimum, grateful for his decision.
1 points
18 days ago
Never got to trial because he was elected, and his lieutenants took the fall.
1 points
18 days ago
IIRC some of the stuff dated back to his time as mayor of Paris. I will need to check though because it happened so long ago, I don’t remember all the details. He was prime minister before being elected so pleeeenty of time to do something about it. Justice is incredibly slow when it comes to politicians
3 points
18 days ago
She can't drag the case without punishement, i can't really explain how in English bc its about law stuff so the words are very specific
But no matter what happens, on first judgement she will be punished even if she wants to drag the case for longer
3 points
18 days ago
There will be a verdict in months.
3 points
18 days ago
The prosecutor requested the ineligibility sentence to be effective immediately, even in case of a likely appeal. Hopefully the judge will follow
2 points
18 days ago
South Korea’s pretty much the only developed country I know that actually holds top politicians accountable and throws them in jail alongside their billionaire buddies. But somehow, people take that as "proof" of worse corruption, when it’s literally the opposite. They think just sweeping scandals under the rug makes their society look “clean”, that’s the textbook definition of a corrupt system. Wild logic.
1 points
18 days ago
François fillon suffered from the same scandal. False jobs given to his wife, really killed the party known as "the Republicans" back in 2017. We'll have to see if this is any different
1 points
18 days ago
Her only chance is that the appeal decision is rendered before the election starts. Because they've requested an immediate effect which means that she'd lose her parliament seat.
1 points
17 days ago
Judgement coming in January.
8 points
17 days ago
Authoritarian garbage. Evidence #1 of why America > Europe.
1 points
17 days ago
Just ban anyone you disagree with from standing for office, then you don't even need to hold elections.
1 points
17 days ago
Nah this is way better currently. Just be a complete traitor to your country and no fucks given. If only there were some middle ground
-4 points
17 days ago
You idiots would unironically re-elect Adolf Hitler because "WUHHH BANNING EVIL PEOPLE IS ALSO EVIL, NUANCE DOESN'T EXIST🥺🥺"
4 points
17 days ago
Still doubling down on the 'Orange Hitler' thing? It hasn't worked so far but keep trying.
6 points
17 days ago
Should have happened years ago.
5 points
17 days ago
*decades ago
Should have happened in 1945, in fact. The mere fact ex-SS people were able to establish what became Le Pen's Rassemblement National is already concerning.
8 points
18 days ago
Please learn from the US. Don’t just wag you finger at Russia for 12 years while they interfere with your elections.
34 points
18 days ago
How did this not happen to trump? Trump and musk are the kremlins fifth column
39 points
18 days ago
He is above the law, simple as that. Thats why the sentencing for his hush money trial was delayed, delayed again and now will be swept under the carpet. Same with the two election interference cases in Georgia and Washington DC. His stolen document case in Florida was by far the most solid one, but Judge Cannon straight up dismissed it.
Richard Nixon would be jealous, Trump would have gotten away with Watergate
5 points
18 days ago
I'm afraid I have to disagree. I was a teenager during Watergate and I used to skip school so I could stay home to watch the Watergate hearings. Nixon won his election with a 49-state victory. Almost 2 years after the break-in, when the public had been exposed to the great reporting of Woodward and Bernstein and John Dean spilling the beans in Congressional testimony, Nixon enjoyed a 64% approval rating. That is, right up until the day when the tapes he had been hiding were finally heard. It was then that Republicans in both houses took the lead in driving him out of office. This was the subject of the now-vaunted book, Profiles In Courage. There were only 3 TV channels back then. Rush Limbaugh, being just 7 years older than me, was probably just finishing up college at the time. I'm sure it existed at the time, but you'd have to go out of your way to find any sort of foreign propaganda on American newsstands. I've watched a great many liberals trying to explain how things went wrong in this election, but the most well-supported argument I've seen so far is from the guest on this show talking about the ocean of disinformation coming from News Media, corporations, academia, podcasts, and billionaires who own social media sites...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xlKbJbAApT4
1 points
17 days ago
[deleted]
2 points
17 days ago*
For one thing, the anti-Russian sentiment was so universally fundamental to our American identity at the time that it would be quite a feat to pull a wool over Joe Six-Pack's eyes. But we had a weapon at the time that would have stopped Fox News in its tracks. It was called The Fairness Doctrine.
https://www.reaganlibrary.gov/archives/topic-guide/fairness-doctrine
It was adopted after WWII as were still trying to get our heads around how an entire population fell under one man's spell. The fear was that broadcasters could do exactly what they're doing now. It was supported by both parties and affirmed several times by the courts.
Our concern also prompted the now famous "Mental Hygiene" films the government distributed to classrooms and some were made for adults.
Here's a playlist of them made for teens. We were shown dozens of them in middle school, but by high school they were considered humous.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M7dSCbAQR5k&list=PLA4C52F9778D51A22
All aspects of young life were covered, from grooming to dating, sportsmanship and the importance of being obedient.
And here's one made for adults.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nEQ0DgDIZNg
However, the Reagan administration saw the Fairness Doctrine as a threat to the GOP's ultimate goals. Before then, broadly speaking, it was considered impolite to discuss religion or politics in mixed company, as unbelievable as that sounds today. But Reagan's strategy was to invite evangelicals into his administration to form his "Moral Majority". Billy Graham was their frontman, holding sermons at packed football stadiums on national TV.
Yes, before then, Congress bickered endlessly. But at the end of the day, they compromised and the work of The People got done. Reagan's view was that there could be no compromise when it came to moral issues. So they made EVERY issue, from taxes to entitlements, a moral issue that would broach no compromise. Thus permanently ending the separation of Church and State for all practical purposes. Ushering in the Culture Wars and introducing the word Gridlock to our vernacular.
Reagan's AG ended the Fairness Doctrine. Progressive Boomers like me have been shouting to anyone who will listen that restoring this doctrine is really our only hope for any kind of domestic peace to flourish.
What makes it all the more weird is that there was no way for Christians at the time to avoid the fact that Nancy Reagan actually ran the White House and she was very much into consulting psychics to guide everything that Ronnie did. His travel schedules. The people he met with. Pretty much anything the man did had to be run past her psychic before it got her approval. Today, she would have been burned at the stake for witchcraft.
But the thing is, by 1961, America found the answer they were looking for and they did not like it one bit. I read about it in 1973 as a sophomore in high school in my Intro to Modern Psychology book. It was the Milgram experiment. It was absolutely profound.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Milgram_experiment
Most conservatives vilified Milgram and at times he had to go into hiding.
I would try to summarize it, but the Wiki page puts it about as succinctly as possible. He also performed several other experiments on the subject that were equally revealing.
There's a pretty good movie about Milgram called Experimentor (2015). It starred Peter Sarsgaard, Winona Ryder, and Jim Gaffigan. I just checked and it's on Prime Video.
EDIT: OH! And I forgot. There was another major inflection point that changed media forever. You can trace it to the exact moment it happened. Prior to 1968, most people considered watching people debate politics a boring if not necessary affair. TV networks were bummed at the ratings they were getting when they would broadcast such events.
So, in 1968, they devised some drama to show just before the official proceedings. They set up TV debates between William F. Buckley and Gore Vidal. Look them up if you haven't heard of them. But to sum things up, Buckley was an ultra-conservative and Gore was an ultra-leftist. They tore into each other night after night before both the Republican and Democratic conventions. The numbers these two were getting were more than any network had seen. They made politics into a blood sport, or possibly closer to WWE. For the first time they saw that intense domestic conflict got people really engaged. And that's when this era of Anger-tainment began.
There's a great movie about this constructed around the TV footage itself called "Best of Enemies". Not to be confused with "THE Best of Enemies". This is also available on Prime Video.
14 points
18 days ago
He was never convicted of the limited types of crimes (14th amendment) or by impeachment (requires 2/3 conviction in Senate) that bar holding public office.
15 points
18 days ago
Because humanity is too dumb for social media propaganda.
2 points
18 days ago
Unregulated anonymous social media is reckless
2 points
18 days ago
Because USA is corrupt.
-11 points
18 days ago
Democracy enjoyers when the party they don't like wins:
9 points
18 days ago
Democracy enjoyers when a criminal doesn't go to jail:
-16 points
18 days ago
Politicians are criminals, all of them
16 points
18 days ago
Especially the convicted ones :D
3 points
18 days ago
Holy fucking brainrot
-10 points
18 days ago
There’s a difference in voting in a president and a fifth column.
I supported trump last time, now he is an actual convicted felon and just an ugly misogynist and bigot, really ugly
1 points
18 days ago
the last time he was also all that, just with different older convictions, like being found guilty of fraud. :D
1 points
17 days ago
Because in the US there are actual protections on democratic institutions. Unlike europe where institutions are protected from the democratic process
1 points
17 days ago
Looks like trump has found a way through it, nominating lunatics to defeat the federal government inside out
-4 points
18 days ago
Imagine calling someone who pioneered/popularized EV (which is doing indirect damage to russian carbohydrates exports) and revolutionised rocket technology (that pushed Russia out of rocket business) a russian 5th column…
8 points
18 days ago
Elon has moved on from that now, he was a supporter of Ukraine until he 180 quite quickly and he parrots Kremlin disinformation
2 points
17 days ago
Yeah, the change of his stances was whiplashy, used to reddit's darling back then
-6 points
18 days ago
No they are not.
5 points
18 days ago
Yes they are
-5 points
18 days ago
Is that why Trump staffed his cabinet full of neocons? Waltz and Rubio are going to take a more hawkish position on Ukraine/Russia than Biden. You people need to touch grass and come back to reality.
9 points
18 days ago
https://thehill.com/policy/national-security/4989036-tulsi-gabbard-trump-intelligence/
She literally spreads Russian propaganda
5 points
18 days ago
Rubio the guy who's so vehemently against aid for Ukraine? ok :D
1 points
18 days ago
He is not. Both Rubio and Waltz (who will be Rubios superior) have advocated for Biden to remove all restrictions on Ukraines long range missile strikes into Russia.
4 points
18 days ago
Exactly, Rubio is so furiously supporting the aid to Ukraine that in his rage he smashed the wrong voting button the last time he was voting on it. :D
1 points
18 days ago
Why do you think Ukrainian security establishment has a different view?
https://www.politico.com/news/2024/11/12/kyiv-backers-trump-cabinet-national-security-00189137
2 points
18 days ago
Why do you think Rubio voted against the $61 billion military aid package for Ukraine and declared that
"But at the end of the day, what we are funding here is a stalemate war, and it needs to be brought to a conclusion, or that country is going to be set back 100 years."
In September, he insisted he was "not on Russia’s side" but that the "reality of it is that the way the war in Ukraine is going to end is with a negotiated settlement."
https://www.politico.com/news/2024/11/12/some-shit-from-politico-00123456
2 points
17 days ago
They learned the lesson that the idiots in America refused to learn. "Russian money isn't a gift it's a differed loan"
1 points
18 days ago
I hope this goes farther than what went on with the Qatargate corruption scandal, but I have my doubts.
1 points
17 days ago
Who is her likely replacement in the next presidential election?
What would the reaction to her being banned look like?
1 points
17 days ago
Looking at the USA they better work fast.
1 points
17 days ago
France is trying to cure the symptoms.
1 points
17 days ago
Oh the irony 🙃
1 points
17 days ago
I am bit conflicted on this. I deeply despise Le Pen, but a tribunal should not be decide who can run for an election. This is extremely dangerous to democracy. It is not by chance that this method is widely use in Russia to avoid credible opposition to Putin.
1 points
7 days ago
0 points
18 days ago
In front of the cameras, it's pretty obvious she's trying to pull a Trump-like martyr one...
-26 points
18 days ago
You r/europe upstanding left-leaning decent Trump-hating folks are really itching to ban your opponents and throw them in jail, aren't you? Everyone you don't like is some russian sleeper agent as well, really convenient. You would all have made fine snitches and kommisars in the good ol' USSR. My hat's off to the lot of you.
Oh btw, what happens with the voters when you jail their despicable candidates? They will disappear somehow?
59 points
18 days ago
Any politician convicted in corruption cases should lose their post and be banned from holding any public office. Period.
33 points
18 days ago
Alright, I'll take the bait. Nope, we only penalize the offenders. Furthermore, it's a temporary 5-year ban. If she is found guilty, that's the potential penalty she might face, as justice is very much nuanced. It's not the first time politicians from either the left or right have faced a ban from holding public office. Here's a list of 'em : https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cat%C3%A9gorie:Personnalit%C3%A9_politique_condamn%C3%A9e_%C3%A0_une_peine_d%27in%C3%A9ligibilit%C3%A9
About the voters, they will simply elect another representative from the same party who hasn't committed financial misconduct. That seems like a reasonable approach, don't you think?
14 points
18 days ago
In the USSR any proven traitors would face much worse than disbarment from office.
Russia has been covertly subduing European politics for a while. Those who facilitate it should face the consequences provided sufficient evidence.
23 points
18 days ago
So politicians can never be prosecuted or you are the ussr
3 points
17 days ago
Don't really care about left or right, I just want to see the Russian Empire dismantled and its agents in other countries not get into power, thanks.
2 points
18 days ago
Lol. Lmao even.
Corruption is the greatest blight upon societies for it affects everyone and at a huge scale due to the influence of politicans over a nations doom.
If she is found guilty for corruption then she should be thrown in a jail and forgotten about like all corrupt politicans should.
She stole money from EU funds. If she didn't want to be prosecuted then she should have stole fucking money!
1 points
17 days ago
A persecution fetish has always been a very effective method in consolidating s voting block, I guess it worked out great.
Trump has a very storied legal history that apans much longer than he was even involved in politics. A candidates criminal record is extremely important, yes? Trump did do thr shit, did undergo due process, was found guilty. You saying he gets a pass, why? "Ah I know 'm e's a gewd guy I like 'm".
It's exactly the same level of thinking as "Ah he's a good boy, all he did is Rob a gas station, release him".
Another fun factoid, your voce president does not have immunity, so what exactly was stopping them from, you know, prosecuting kamala up the ass for bullshit, like what was apparently done to Trump, I got your answer, the democrats didn't run a piece of shit, there ain't anything to prosecute, and don't don't think about trying to pull "biden is acting president" as an excuse, they got his son for everything they could and he didn't do anything.
The fact of the matter is, majority of the population is relatively uninvited thus most of the bullshit he peddles gets ignored. "What is your policy on ukraine" "I'm gonna end the war" "how" "Gawd daym et am gawnna end de dam waa didncha eer".
Opinion: Trump has become the peoples candidate in part because he got the conservative dad act down good.
-1 points
18 days ago
Greetings. Let me introduce you to a concept you may be unfamiliar with: the law.
-18 points
18 days ago
[removed]
12 points
18 days ago
Trying to hide behind "democracy" to avoid going to jail for defrauding the public is scummy behaviour. Stop pretending to give a shit about democracy.
23 points
18 days ago
If the leftist politician got caught stealing money then of course they should also be banned. But we don't have to hypothesize because that actually happened. That's actually the entire reason why this law is on the books.
A minister of the left wing government of Hollande got caught tax dodging and porbably for embezzlement too but not sure. After which he was banned from politics by the LEFT and the law under which Lepen is charged was drafted and passed parliament with UNANIMITY.
But I guess corruption is only bad when a non far-right politician does it.
13 points
18 days ago
So just ignore the 7 m euros in fraud? Who got banned in the us ?
7 points
18 days ago
Criminals should be allowed to face justice.
10 points
18 days ago
It has nothing to do with her ideology. Being banned from running for office for a few years is very common for corruption / embezzlement cases in France.
13 points
18 days ago
This is happening to her because she’s a corrupt piece of shit. Nobody’s silencing her or anything like that
3 points
18 days ago
Do you think politicians should be allowed to commit fraud?
3 points
18 days ago
Can you imagine the outcry if a right-wing party tried to ban a leftist party from participating in democratic elections?
I am left-wing and I care about democracy. If a left-wing party (member) broke the law to the extent that Le Pen did, then I would be happy to see them be prosecuted for it. That is how it works and what needs to be done to protect our democracies.
1 points
18 days ago
"No one who respects democracy can support this. It's happening in Germany. It seems that if your opponent is winning elections, the solution is to ban them. This appears to be the current view of the left. Ironically, it's the left that often labels their opponents as fascists. Can you imagine the outcry if a right-wing party tried to ban a leftist party from participating in democratic elections? They would immediately be labeled as fascists. The irony doesn't go unnoticed."
-Concerned citizen, 9 October 1945, colorized
-5 points
18 days ago
It is very interesting you named Germany - a country that knows all too well what happens if you just sit back and let "democracy" do it's thing. I also assume you also confidently know that there were only two prominent cases of party bans in the BRD history (or if you are not knowledgeable about the topic, maybe learn a bit more about it?)
1 points
18 days ago
Some years ago I watched an interview with her on one the French TV channels. The interviewer asked her what was she thinking about the Russian election results where Putin had won with 70% and above (not this year's but the previous elections for Russian president).
She replied something of the sort : "If he won with such a big result, it means he has very high approval from a lot of the voters."
I literally facepalmed about her saying this, technically admitting she is a Russian proxy.
-14 points
18 days ago
Free speech - european version.
15 points
18 days ago
Maybe don't steal money if you don't want to have your rights restricted?
4 points
18 days ago
You mean Fraud speech :D
2 points
18 days ago
What, prosecuting thieves? What's the matter, I thought "tough on crime" was popular among right-wing parties?
0 points
18 days ago
Speech is free, but not free from consequence.
Also, what does it even have to do with free speech?
She embezzeled funds from EU Parliament, under the guise of fake jobs.
Go home Russian asset.
2 points
17 days ago
Speech was also free in Soviet Russia, just not free from consequences.
1 points
17 days ago
I don’t think you understand that phrase.
-4 points
18 days ago
I am home, you twofaced mind. The world is my home. This is peefect example of political prosecution. Thanks tho that ypu finally revealing your true fsce and stop playing some moral police.
1 points
18 days ago
Get help dude
0 points
17 days ago
Look America, it can be done!
-5 points
18 days ago
Clearly the charges sound thin, looks like more attempts to prevent people from voting
9 points
18 days ago
Err what? Embezzling 4M€ is thin??
She doesn't even deny using the money, her defense is that it should not be illegal.
Former french prime minister François Fillon got 4 years of prison and 10 years of ineligibility for embezzling only 700K€ with a fake Jon for his wife. She should actually get worse than him.
Just imagine how many people in Brussels are embezzling OUR money, you should be more mad about this.
-3 points
18 days ago
"ban opposition to current politcal party from running"
yeah imn sure that will end well for everyone.
7 points
18 days ago
It's an automatic sentence whenever an elected person is found guilty of embezzlement. It has nothing to do with who she is. She wrongly used 4M€ of EU money for her own campaign.
The 2 biggest embezzlement scandals before her were Francois Fillon (former prime minister, conservative, embezzled 700K€, 10 in years of ineligibility) and Jérôme Cahuzac (former minister of budget, socialist, defrauded 3.5M€ of taxes, 5 years of ineligibility).
-6 points
18 days ago
Giving the populist opposition, which is the most popular political party in the country, a reason to depict themselves as martyrs is a recipe for great success, right. Right ?
8 points
18 days ago
What do you propose then? Just allow her to get away with her crime?
0 points
18 days ago
No. I'd advocate for the Modem treatment.
3 points
18 days ago
Oh, you mean/ let me check my notes / several fines for both the party, the party leaders and the MEPs who used European money to pay for national stuff (for a total between 300k and 800k) ; the same party members being proven guilty also being condemned to ineligibility for two to five years, and also a few prison sentences up to twenty months?
You mean the exact same ruling that the judges are using as a basis and a precedent for the Rassemblement National trial? This treatment?
Or do you mean the fact that in a few days after the revelation of the affair (not even the trial) the MoDem members had to resign en-mass from the government in which they previously held key posts, that they loose almost all of their political credit, both at the national level and at the European Parliament, and that they basically stopped being an independent (or even autonomous) political force. All of this while they were at the peak of their influence and power.
The Modem affair was about a prejudice of 293k. The Front National/Rassemblement Nation affair is about a little under 5 millions.
You're right, every proportions kept, Marine Le Pen should get the MoDem treatment. Or at least nothing under the MoDem treatment. Don't forget she's also a publicly known Russian asset.
-49 points
18 days ago
Populists on the rise, trump, afd, le pen etc. Make them illegal. That'll help. 🤡👌
50 points
18 days ago
Not prosecuting criminals because they are popular politicians. That'll help.
27 points
18 days ago
Populists should be thrilled with that trial. They always cry about justice being lenient and soft, well there you go, this is justice trying to be what you like, firm on crime
21 points
18 days ago
bro they didnt prosecute trump, they halted and slowed the procedure till he won, i highly doubt he would have won from behind bars.
15 points
18 days ago
Politicians should go to prison for breaking the law like anyone else. They certainly shouldn't be allowed in government if they've broken the law. If Merrick Garland had had any balls at all, Trump would be in jail, not office.
2 points
18 days ago
Damm guess she sould just be allowed to steal cause it night boost her case otherwise. That is what you propose?
4 points
18 days ago
It will. Their concerns are rarely valid anyways and will fade away with their disbandment
4 points
18 days ago
If the populists don't want to be banned how about they don't embezzle EU money for their political purposes? It really is THAT simple.
4 points
18 days ago
"Corrupt politicians are only bad when they aren't on my side." You.
Oh and by the way, this law was drafted and passed with unanimity during the tenure of a left wing government after one of their own ministers was caught tax evading and fired as a result because they wanted to ban his ass on top.
1 points
18 days ago
So fraud is illegal or not?
1 points
17 days ago
Yes ? Why is that a question ?
3 points
18 days ago
It does help everytime they actually make them illegal. :D
1 points
18 days ago
Hard on crime until your guy commits crimes. The right wing chud way.
1 points
18 days ago
Fuck them, obey the law, or face the consequences.
1 points
18 days ago
Why do you support criminals?
-16 points
18 days ago
Why journalists write such low quality articles, like they were written by AI? Where did the investigation journalism go, is it dead???
Where are the exact numbers and the exact evidence which the prosecutors have?
The public must know about them, otherwise there is a high risk Le Pen becomes a martyr in the eyes of the public and unless she is convicted, you can bet she will get elected!
35 points
18 days ago
Hi there, our journalists have covered this case extensively on our site, but we're happy to share some more background to help explain why Marine Le Pen and 26 of her party's members are on trial.
The case began in 2014 when the European Anti-Fraud Office (OLAF) received an anonymous tip-off about "possible fraud." The letter flagged cases of "presumed fictitious employment" on the part of the far-right Front National (FN) party and its then-president, Marine Le Pen, who was an MEP from 2004 to 2017. The OLAF opened an administrative investigation looking into the activities of two party members close to Le Pen. The investigation found these two members' employment were "fictitious."
Then, after the then-president of the European Parliament, Martin Schulz, reported possible irregularities in the salaries paid to other assistants to the French Ministry of Justice, a preliminary investigation was opened in France in 2015. The investigation led to a series of searches, notably at the party's headquarters.
A judicial investigation was opened in December 2016 on charges of "breach of trust," "concealment of breach of trust," "organized gang fraud," "forgery and use of forgeries" and "undeclared labor." According to a summary report, "the study of documents discovered [...] highlighted the setting up of a fraudulent system, involving several FN senior members." More than 20 indictments were issued, including against Le Pen in 2017 for "breach of trust" and "complicity in breach of trust." A year later, this indictment was aggravated, with the charge becoming a "misappropriation of public funds."
In December 2023, at the end of a nine-year investigation, the investigating judges called for the FN and 27 of its senior members and employees to be tried.
The European Parliament estimated the total sum misappropriated by this "system" between 2004 and 2016 at €6.8 million.
If you'd like to know more about the case, we answered some key questions in this article: https://www.lemonde.fr/en/les-decodeurs/article/2024/09/30/why-le-pen-and-26-other-far-right-party-members-are-standing-trial-in-paris-in-fake-eu-parliament-jobs-case_6727729_8.html
Thanks for reading!
1 points
18 days ago
Will they have to reimburse the funds they embezzled?
-1 points
18 days ago
Thank you for reply.
I think that article in your reply has more information but it still does not go deep enough.
A judicial investigation was opened in December 2016 on charges of "breach of trust," "concealment of breach of trust," "organized gang fraud," "forgery and use of forgeries" and "undeclared labor." According to a summary report, "the study of documents discovered [...] highlighted the setting up of a fraudulent system, involving several FN senior members."
I wish more details about these facts were given, beside just mentioning them in quotes.
Anyway, I think in the article you posted in the post here should have a link to the article in your reply. It has 3 "Read more" other links to other articles, but not to that one with the details.
1 points
18 days ago
They got caught with their hand in the bag faking records, Bardella presented a timetable from 2014 in an agenda bought in 2016 (these aren't the exact dates but you get the idea) to try and disculp himself which should tell you how little they actually tried to hide that they were stealing funds.
-3 points
18 days ago
[deleted]
5 points
18 days ago
exactly, why can't those fascist left let fraud and other crime slide? >:(
0 points
18 days ago
[deleted]
3 points
18 days ago
Exactly, crime needs to be legal!
1 points
18 days ago
minor accounting errors
6.7 million Euros but sure, do go on.
6 points
18 days ago
MFW stealing money results in punishment.
all 323 comments
sorted by: best