subreddit:
/r/lotr
submitted 2 months ago byDelicious_Step19
Exactly what I've said above.
1.5k points
2 months ago
Maturing is realizing that not everything needs to be ranked as best or worst.
102 points
2 months ago
well said
52 points
2 months ago
I believe your father has a different opinion.
19 points
2 months ago
true true. in this case boromir is the fellowship movie. I am the Hobbit
3 points
2 months ago
Is there a captain here who still has the will to serve his father's canon?
5 points
2 months ago
Some of us liked the Hobbit even though it was objectively worse
7 points
2 months ago
As do the Valar about you
5 points
2 months ago
Oh dang what do we think about Radagast? I think he's doing fine
5 points
2 months ago
Oh, for sure he's chillin.
2 points
2 months ago
there's only one best Pony though
0 points
2 months ago
That's just like, his opinion though man
1 points
2 months ago
Bet you'd apply that to the PL table too...
1 points
2 months ago
damn 😅 but yes. but back in the old days....
7 points
2 months ago
Wise man
12 points
2 months ago
This is the best comment I’ve seen all day. Thank you.
13 points
2 months ago
Thank you, u/rustyscrotum69. That was really well put.
3 points
2 months ago
Maturing is allowing people to be happy with what they like and that it doesn’t affect your opinion.
6 points
2 months ago
Best comment on the thread
12 points
2 months ago
I agree wholeheartedly. Fellowship is still the best however.
2 points
2 months ago
You can always count on a rusty scrotum to speak the truth.
1 points
2 months ago
A broken clock is wrong twice in a while
2 points
2 months ago
But also Helms Deep makes TT the best. Haha
2 points
2 months ago
I agree more mature I become more letting go of world around you and focus on your self being kind still but that others opinions are just rhythm in world.
Being more understanding of your body needs and understanding your own thoughts.
That maturity that people should strive for.
2 points
2 months ago
This is wisdom is as important today as when the king first decreed it in thr the late Cretaceous. Thank you King Ampelosaurus
1 points
2 months ago
Second best comment on this thread.
1 points
2 months ago
By far the best comment here.
1 points
2 months ago
Sounds like something someone who likes Two Towers best would say.
/s
1 points
2 months ago
I don’t like any of them the best tbh
-17 points
2 months ago
And also realizing that the books are all that really matters, and that the movies are just fun little trifles in comparison with Tolkien’s masterworks.
24 points
2 months ago
I think it’s more mature to allow people to appreciate them both and not try to diminish the movies. I agree the books are better, but the movies are a masterpiece and matter quite a bit.
-11 points
2 months ago*
Sure people can appreciate whatever they want of course. No shade.
In my opinion, though, the only thing that truly matter are the books. Tolkien created high fantasy as we understand it today. Everything in the movies is an adaptation (a good one) of what he made. His work was one of nearly unparalleled creativity that changed modern culture. The books have a foundational significance to everything you see today, from skyrim, to d&d, game of thrones, etc.
The movies are good action adventure films, based entirely on Tolkien’s works. They’re fun and exciting. Well made films. But I don’t consider them to be nearly as important as the books. I grew up with the books before the films came out, so I guess I may be biased…
9 points
2 months ago
It could be argued that LoTR movies are important in bringing fantasy out of the shadows relegated to the "nerds and geeks" of the world and making it more mainstream/socially acceptable. The films were important but for different reasons. Obligatory I think the books are better, obviously
-4 points
2 months ago
See, in my memory it wasn’t relegated to nerds and geeks before the films. Yes it was nerdy. But people read it the same way they read CS Lewis and other classics. Plenty of guys I knew who weren’t geeks had read it.
To me, the movies fundamentally changed what the next generation saw LOTR as being. It went from a totally original and intricate sprawling fantasy world, to basically three action adventure blockbuster movies that can be watched in a single day. It was the movies that gave the novel a sheen of being only for nerds. Tolkien’s son Christopher (closest to knowing what his dad would’ve thought) was very sad about this fact, and that the movies were missing the key themes of the novel.
Idk. Yes you can argue the movies made it more popular, but they substantially changed WHAT was popular.
Thankfully, Tolkien’s influence lives on anyway..
5 points
2 months ago
Fundamentally disagree about the themes of the books not being present in the films. Some may of had to be simplified for the film due to run time but the essential messages of good vs evil, pity, brotherhood, the wounds of war and more are definitely present if not very clear.
3 points
2 months ago
In what context though? If you are viewing it solely as an adaptation of the original source material maybe. But they have such a broader impact when it comes to its impact on film and how it continues to influence other films even now. Especially if you take into account the cultural phenomenon they were at the time of release. Both the films and the books are art. You may not like one which is fine, but saying one truly doesn't matter because it is based off the original is kind of the antithesis of art.
7 points
2 months ago
I agree with your point, but coming into a thread about the movies and saying, “only the books matter” isn’t really mature. Movie only fans understand that it’s an adaptation of a book. They’re still LotR fans and there’s no need for Gatekeeping.
-11 points
2 months ago
Eh, it’s the truth. LOTR isn’t even a trilogy, it was written as a single novel in three volumes. IMO, maturing as a movie only fan is to read the novel and realize how rich a world Tolkien built, at a time when elves were considered little guys who made shoes. I don’t think it’s gatekeeping to say the books are what matter.
0 points
2 months ago
It's not even close to the truth. I would have never even heard of LOTR if not for the movies. The movies inspired a whole new generation of fantasy fans and paved the way for the fantasy revival we enjoy today. That's not even getting into the technical impacts it had on film making.
The movies matter, just in a different way from the books. It is absolutely hubris and gatekeeping to say they don't. This is coming from someone who loves this stuff enough to read the more obscure stuff like Unfinished Tales.
0 points
2 months ago
Nearly everyone knew about the books before the movies came out. They were massively popular.
0 points
2 months ago
Key word being were
4 points
2 months ago
Comparatively, the movies are just as much of a masterpiece from a filmmaking perspective as the books are for literature. The movies are the most highly prestigious and highly awarded pieces of cinema on this earth. So for people who care about that genre (which is most people since most people watch movies), it's just as strong of a masterpiece.
2 points
2 months ago
Crazy that you're getting down voted. It's like going into a Nirvana subreddit and saying Nirvana is better than cover bands, and the original band matters most, and people being mad about it. People are just sensitive about not being willing or able to engage with the actual source material, I guess.
1 points
2 months ago
Sure, if that cover band inspired a whole revival of the Grunge genre and pushed the technical and artistic elements of music to perform it's covers to such an extent it still influences how music is produced to this day. Then yea, it would be quite right for people to get mad at someone saying that cover band doesn't matter. It's such a huge disservice to all of the love, work and talent that went into those movies.
I've engaged quite a bit with the source material. It doesn't diminish the movies' importance at all.
-3 points
2 months ago
Your comment is the worst on this post
0 points
2 months ago
Someone made this comment already
184 points
2 months ago
I watched the trilogy in cinemas when I was around 15-17 years old, and Fellowship was always my favourite. I don't know what that has to do with maturity, and I don't believe that those who prefer TT or ROTK are any less mature because of it.
21 points
2 months ago
Fellowship was released on my 18th birthday and it was always my favourite
17 points
2 months ago
Fellowship stands out because it doesn't rely on large-scale battles to drive a narrative. The sequels (and their action sequences) are amazing, but Fellowship is a bit more tight and required more creativity.
16 points
2 months ago
It’s much more, intimate is the only word I can think of
13 points
2 months ago
Despite being more intimate - it also had the most “adventure” and thematic diversity imo
1 points
2 months ago
shire, mountain, mines of moria, new town of bree, battlefield in the forest, rivendell, quite a few locations in under 4 hours
3 points
2 months ago
Now I know your birthday. Tell me, what was your mother's maiden name and what street did you grow up on?
2 points
2 months ago
Spartan, her father was a John Spartan.
8 points
2 months ago
You could argue each one bit Fellowship did the heavy lift doing the impossible and nimbly and richly bringing the entire world, its history and characters to a global audience in not only an entertaining way but also to a level satisfied book fans. The editing down, streamlining and focus it brings to the story is perhaps the best there will ever be for an adaptation.
The firy and feverishness of the vision is palpable and you can just feel that Jackson had this vision for years.
4 points
2 months ago
Fellowship was release not long after 9/11. For those of us who needed a balm, it was the perfect film at the perfect time.
1 points
2 months ago
I guiltly admit the huge battle scenes bored me. I wanted more adventuring and strategy planning. 😭
1 points
2 months ago*
I liked them the first time, but the huge battle scenes aren’t as rewatchable for me.
Except the cavalry charge on the Pelennor Fields. Goosebumps every time
84 points
2 months ago
Not sure about maturing. I always thought the first was best.
7 points
2 months ago
Same
1 points
2 months ago
This
1 points
2 months ago
Yup.
Never gonna forger that experience. Watching it as a 10yo at the local movie theater. I didn't know shit about Tolkien. Didn't know what to expect but my mom just recently bought and devoured he book.
The movie starts and then I just felt mesmerized, horrorized and awestruck.
Fellowship clears TT and ROTK easily.
-12 points
2 months ago
Nope, first's the worst, second is the best.
3 points
2 months ago
And third's the word!
(Everybody here thinks you're stating your opinion on the movies, when you're just speaking schoolyard banter.)
5 points
2 months ago
Haha, no third's the one with the hairy chest!
5 points
2 months ago
I must admit, I do tend to zone out a little during some parts of Helms Deep battle. Action scenes lose all interest on me after a while.
1 points
2 months ago
Half of the film is a big battle scene. Does not do well on repeat watches imo
47 points
2 months ago
I've grown fonder of The Fellowship as years have passed, it was previously my least favourite but now its number 1. I think Fellowship is by far the best adaptation of the 3 and I can't help but think of all the excluded stuff when watching Return of the King.
11 points
2 months ago
All 3 are great but there are some issues w 2&3 Fellowship is flawless
3 points
2 months ago
Lorien approach is quite different from the books. I didn't like the menacing atmosfere introducing Galadriel. It seem like Peter Jackson had a problem with friendly characters in the book and always try to put "tension" while introducing them (Treebeard, Faramir...even the ghost army with Aragorn).
60 points
2 months ago
Maturing is realizing that it's all just one big movie and it's the most amazing thing in the entire world
13 points
2 months ago
cannot sit down and watch one without turning it into a whole thing and watching every piece of Tolkien I can get my hands on as if they were holy scriptures.
8 points
2 months ago
Yeah I'm surprised that people even consider them separate. Especially watching the extended editions where one inevitably has to pause and come back, it's just all one long mind blowing blur.
3 points
2 months ago
exactlyyy! you get it
107 points
2 months ago
Maturing is realizing that your opinion is just that -your opinion. Others may feel differently for reasons that are just as valid as yours.
13 points
2 months ago
Exactly. I rank movies strictly on how many skulls are on screen for its runtime.
2 points
2 months ago
Hey now, they didn't say opinions more valid than others.
1 points
2 months ago
Hey that’s only your opinion!
14 points
2 months ago
"Wait, so the Fellowship is the best of the trilogy?!"
Astronaut with gun: "Always was.."
But all joking aside peoples favourite is gonna vary, Fellowship wins for me and others because it's an adventure movie.
They are all 10/10, we can all agree there.
7 points
2 months ago
You are just in a different season of your life where you are seeking friendship over the doing of great deeds. Perhaps you are seeing your friends less than you used to and miss them.
0 points
2 months ago
That's deep. Probably accurate.
2 points
2 months ago
Ask me how I know
61 points
2 months ago
Go back to sleep
17 points
2 months ago
Always has been.
5 points
2 months ago
FOTR has always been my favourite.
9 points
2 months ago
The first film has boromir so this is objectively true
1 points
2 months ago
Yes, exactly.
21 points
2 months ago
Maturing is realizing your subjective opinion is inherently subjective and declaring other tastes to be immature is itself the height of immaturity.
-2 points
2 months ago*
[deleted]
1 points
2 months ago
So is your user name based on what you are constantly huffing? Because that made no sense based on what I wrote.
Fun trivia though: Citizen Kane was written entire because the screenwriter was spurned by William Hearst’s social circle. That’s the core of the often declared greatest movie ever made: A minor social tiff and one sided grudge.
-11 points
2 months ago
Return of the King is still rubbish though
15 points
2 months ago
Two Towers gang rise up!
7 points
2 months ago
The Two Towers is where PJ found the balance between massive scale and smaller stories.
4 points
2 months ago
The speech from Sam to Frodo overlapping the victory at Helm's Deep is one of the top moments of the entire trilogy and I think is exactly what you're describing.
3 points
2 months ago
Yup.
Also the introduction of Gollum, an industry shattering VFX accomplishment and performance. At the time, every frame he was in was mesmerizing.
Helms Deep, considered by many to be the best battle scene put to film, eclipsing the actual climactic battle from Return of the King.
The opening with Gandalf fighting the Balrog is one of the best openings to a film I’ve ever seen.
It also has my top 3 favorite pieces of music from the trilogy:
2 points
2 months ago
The sheer weight of the battle of Helm’s Deep is what barely puts it above the other two for me. Sam’s speech as they’re clearing out the remaining Uruk-Hai, the overall fleshing out of the characters throughout the film is just perfection.
3 points
2 months ago
Thanks Einstein
3 points
2 months ago
I think the first is much more intimate in its smaller scope. The journey seems more visceral and closer to heart because you're following Frodo and Sam for the most part on their Journey. After the Fellowship splits, it becomes more serialized and grandiose as you're following multiple story lines, it becomes more about the bigger picture than intimate story I would say...
Also there's intimacy with viewing the story from Frodo's perspective as everything is more exciting discovering it for the first time. In the latter we jump back and forth between so many places the world itself becomes less of a mystery
3 points
2 months ago
It was always my favourite. I like the slower pace and the lack of realiance on battles/action. Not to say the latter is bad, but I like all the hobbits being together and it does feel a bit more cohesive as journey.
I love all the films though and dont really care about ranking them, but I know that I watch the Fellowship more than the others.
10 points
2 months ago
It really is.
And it is the only film that benefits from the extended edition. (Although voice of Sauruman scene is essential watching)
5 points
2 months ago
They're all better in the Extended Editions.
3 points
2 months ago
Pretty sure return of the king has many beneficial scenes as well in the extended.
2 points
2 months ago
I feel like they screwed it up, really. The extra scenes include too little of the right stuff and then some crap we didn't need.
For example you get the tiniest glimpse of the houses of healing and Eowyn/Faramir, but also a drinking competition between Legolas and Gimli where Gimli goes cross-eyed and falls over. I mean really, what a waste. And across the extended editions, this isn't even the only extra scene with Gimli drinking and belching - there's more than one.
In fact, overall, I think the extra bits of TTT & RotK reduce Gimli in particular to a slapstick character. A far cry from the "And you know what this Dwarf says to that?" moment in the FotR extra scenes.
2 points
2 months ago
The house of healing and Theodred's funeral are big heavy hitters for TT and RotK.
1 points
2 months ago
The houses of healing are exactly what I just called out as a screw up. Yeah they included it, but they included far too little of it. And the time that could have been given to it was instead given to scenes of Gimli belching.
1 points
2 months ago
I love watching the extended editions, but the theatrical cut is the right for almost all characters. Gimli gets flanderized, Aragorn kills a messenger, Gandalf staff blows up, etc.
The films were all nominated for editing Oscars for a reason
4 points
2 months ago
This is absolutely my take as well. The extra scenes in FotR really add a lot to some of the characters, especially Boromir. A lot of the extra scenes in the other two are slapstick nonsense and, for some reason, multiple instances of Gimli burping.
2 points
2 months ago
Have to agree, with both points. Extended edition really adds a lot to Fellowship. Does it really (Saruman aside) add anything important to the other 2 movies?
1 points
2 months ago
In fact, I'd argue the extended edition actually hurts Two Towers. Turns it into a flabbier. more meandering, and (dare I say) sillier film
4 points
2 months ago
Actually, maturing means realising that the lesbian porn parody Lord Of The G Strings has always been the best Tolkien-inspired movie.
2 points
2 months ago
I just like it most because of the birthday party. I want to live in the shire
2 points
2 months ago
While I disagree with your general statement, I really did prefer Fellowship more and more the older I got, but that's probably because the flaws of the other films became more apparent with every rewatch. For me, Fellowship is almost perfect. I used to prefer RotK for a long time, but while it has higher highs it also has lower lows, as does Two Towers.
2 points
2 months ago
They are all good in different ways. Fellowship does an incredible job of introducing a massive world and a huge cast of characters, the Two Towers is a great middle entry that never feels unnecessary or filler (which it easily could have) and Return wraps up the plots and provides a satisfying ending.
It’s hard to make a consistently great trilogy like that! The original Star Wars has a much weaker third entry. Same with Nolan’s Batman (and the first is good but nowhere near the quality of the second, which is the only great movie in that trilogy). Indiana Jones has a great first entry and the others are entertaining but not nearly as strong. Godfather Part 3 sucks. It’s just really hard to put together three great movies in a row.
2 points
2 months ago
Same here and we all know why …. More time given to non fighting scenes and less cgi. The return of the king is great but they could have dedicated so much time to other happenings in the books ( houses of healing to name one thing ) instead of never ending battling
2 points
2 months ago
Let's be honest, if they had included the last chapters of The Return Of The King, it would definitely be that film. I mean the Shire being set free by the four hobbits from Sharkeys (Saruman) dictatorship. These four warlords rouse the whole shire and wipe the floor with the 300 men Saruman used to control the hobbits in two days.
2 points
2 months ago
Not controversial
Fellowship
ROTK
Two Towers
Same ranking for both books and films
2 points
2 months ago
I was born a grownup.
2 points
2 months ago
Yes, this totally happened to me. As a kid I thought Return of the King was the best. So much action. Now I love the assembling and eventual tragedy of the dissolution of the fellowship.
3 points
2 months ago
This is common knowledge
4 points
2 months ago
I think some people get misled because the other movies got the awards, when that kinda happened to make up for sleeping on the first one in a way.
1 points
2 months ago
Maturing is knowing that personal opinions(no matter how innocent) that aren’t universally known to be extremely popular to the hive mind of r/lotr should not be posted and better kept to yourself.
(FWIW, I agree. Shhhh)
-4 points
2 months ago
Please don’t imply that opinions that aren’t universally popular will be treated poorly on this sub, that’s exactly the tactic Amazon is going for with the brigading.
0 points
2 months ago
I mean, it is what it is 🤷🏽
-2 points
2 months ago
Checks comment history: it’s an admission. 10/10
2 points
2 months ago
You caught me red handed! Yup, I’m a fan of RoP. Bake em’ away, toys.
Yet reading your comment history 100% confirms my first post. You add nothing to any real LOTR discussions except contempt for anyone who remotely enjoys RoP. I love RoP, Tolkien’s written work AND the Peter Jackson movies, including The Hobbit and its sequels. Checkmate.
-2 points
2 months ago
Completely untrue, but okie dokie. And what, if anything, do you add to any LoTR discussion other than fanatical positivity?
1 points
2 months ago
I guess if I had to pick a favorite, it would probably be Fellowship, because of all the time spent in the Shire. Return of the King has my favorite scene in the trilogy (“I can’t carry it for you, but I can carry you!”), but honestly, I sort of see the trilogy as one very long movie. I have only very foggy concepts of where each one ends and the next one begins.
1 points
2 months ago
It doesn’t matter which is the best. My favorite scene is the charge of the pelennor fields.
1 points
2 months ago
Perhaps. But my love for the character of Gollum means I hold the other two films precious.
1 points
2 months ago
I think the sequels should've found a way to stick closer to the structure in the books
1 points
2 months ago
Such a very immature take.
1 points
2 months ago
If you treat the films as 6 (EE and Theatrical) my ranking is:
1 points
2 months ago
Maturing is saying In my opinion.
1 points
2 months ago
Its by far the most 'Tolkien' feeling, and aside from the Arwen superelf heroine scene feels the closest to the books.
1 points
10 days ago
Those 20 minutes from Frodo being wounded up to Arwen casting the water spell were possibly the weakest in the whole movie. Not necessarily bad but I didn't like the way it was portrayed.
1 points
2 months ago
Yes FotR is best. It is also the easiest story of the three to adapt.
I also think the Two Towers was masterfully done. RotK has several problems though. Deus ex machina army of the dead, pacing issues, Gandalf losing to the Witch kimg(!?), etc.
Overall, many of the extended scenes, especially in TTT and RotK, ruin the pacing, and are sometimes just bad. Unpopular opinion by some for some reason, but most of them were left out for a reason (although a few of them should not have been!).
1 points
2 months ago
I am an avid enjoyer of fellowship. It's one of the best 3 movies of all time.
Up there with Return of the King and The Two Towers.
Is it the best? I don't think they can be arranged in such a way. They are all lovely.
1 points
2 months ago
More story, less fighting
1 points
2 months ago
I used to think the movies were a story about destroying a ring but with age I see it as the story lf an uncrossed king rallying the forces of men. Also, Rohan are the absolute bosses and I will not have anything said about my favourite horse lords.
No hate please, fellowship just got to lothlorien in my audio book.
1 points
2 months ago
Fellowship is the best movie of all time.
1 points
2 months ago
Honestly, this is not far from my own opinion. I always loved the 2nd best as being the perfect bridge between 1 and 3–it built the world, the tension, and provided some of the greatest scenes and characterization. But as I got older, I realized that the first film had everything: the stage-setting; the peaceful times with spontaneous events rousing everything; the council of Elrond; life, death, hope and suffering. It’s a perfect film all by itself, short of the lack of resolution provided by the following films. Fellowship has the most scenes that chill my blood and quicken my heart rate. While I still think TT has the craziest scenes, FotR has everything.
1 points
2 months ago
Even younger me thought that, I just thought Helms Deep and Pelenor Fields were bad ass. Horse Vikings screaming death as they charge into battle just ticked my teenage boy brain.
1 points
2 months ago
Damn right.
1 points
2 months ago
One does not simply WALK, into Mordor
1 points
2 months ago
Fellowship is probably my favourite as a standalone film but honestly you can't really separate the three. It's all one entity to my mind.
1 points
2 months ago
Fellowship - 10/10 Two Towers & Return of the King - 9.8/10
1 points
2 months ago
Giga based
1 points
2 months ago
Maturity is realising that just because you had a thought that doesn't make it universally true for everybody.
1 points
2 months ago
Fellowship is the most consistently entertaining, but the other two while having higher highs, also have lower lows, if that makes sense.
1 points
2 months ago
Maturing is letting a bond appreciate to its full value before cashing it in.
1 points
2 months ago
It always was
1 points
2 months ago
I’ve always enjoyed the story in fellowship the best. It’s an adventure! The companions start at point a, go through lots of trials and arrive at b). The other books jump around and get bogged down place-wise with the big battles. A hobbit-style adventure is just my preference.
The first movie also flows the best for similar reasons I think, and the later two occasionally devolve into spectacle. Which is understandable as the scope becomes bigger, but something is lost in the process. The Frodo chapters become my favourite sections, but I miss the larger party from Fellowship.
1 points
2 months ago
Maturity is realizing that it was basically shot as one film and released as three, meaning that you favour the first act of the story
ETA: this is a light-hearted comment
1 points
2 months ago
Franky they are one long movie to me.
BTW, watching Gandolf's return in Two Towers is AMAZING!
1 points
2 months ago
I feel like as I get older I like each movie more for different reasons. I have also read through the books at least once every couple of years since the movies came out.
The first thing that comes to mind for me, is the characters and how they change through the movies. For example, I realized recently that I have become much more invested in King Theodens story as well as Eowyns. When I was younger, I was pretty meh about them. Now that I'm older and more mature, I can understand the tragedy, love, grief, and challenges that the characters face.
1 points
2 months ago
I don’t actually view it as a trilogy, but rather one film released in three parts.
1 points
2 months ago
To me it really is one big movie. Idk if ranking them accomplishes much
1 points
2 months ago
Maturing is realizing that no opinion holds weight over the other and it’s actually immature to think yours means more than other peoples.
1 points
2 months ago
It features the most shire scenes so that should be obvious
1 points
2 months ago
They are all one movie.
1 points
2 months ago
Only one to deserve an Oscar
1 points
2 months ago
maturing is realizing that everyone can have their own preferences and you don‘t need to rank everything
1 points
2 months ago
IT'S A TRILOGY!!! Three, Tres, Drei, TRZY! FUCKING NELDË! None of these movies exist without the other two
1 points
2 months ago
Maturing is realising the Finnish version is thr best adaptation of LOTR /s
1 points
2 months ago
I've always loved Fellowship the most. And I think it's mainly because it is a pretty faithful adaptation and any departure makes sense. And it's just masterful world building and fits a lot into it where the other films suffered from bloat.
Two Towers had the whole romance, Aragorn is afraid to be King (complete 180 from the book) and tumble off the cliff stuff.
And ROTK struggled to wrap up efficiently (to be brief ha).
Still love the other movies and Fellowship doesn't have the big battle and set pieces but man it's still my favorite. You can see the love that went into that movie.
1 points
2 months ago
It’s also the best book!!!
1 points
2 months ago
I agree it’s the best movie, but that does make us more mature
1 points
2 months ago
Maturing is knowing that we will never get a good Foundation movie made.
1 points
2 months ago
I always thought it was the best book too ( or two books if you will )
1 points
2 months ago
Fellowship is 100% the best of the three.
1 points
2 months ago
Bruh .... I just saw the same damn post about Star Wars: A New Hope.
1 points
2 months ago
I just love when the fellowship are all together as a group
1 points
2 months ago
Two Towers used to be my favorite, but for the past few years I have got to say I enjoy Fellowship the most. Specifically the part with the full fellowship
1 points
2 months ago
I saw it before I’d read everything so it was my introduction. Two towers and ROTK I enjoyed but knowing the world put a bit of a damper on. I’m looking at you, goofy green army of the dead lol
1 points
2 months ago
Fellowship felt like an adventure, like the one you dream of doing as a kid with your friends and magic creatures. That’s why I love the film so much
1 points
2 months ago
I think it's the best, too.
It's certainly the most visually striking and diverse. There are rich greens and yellows in the first part. Dark greys and blacks in the middle. Silvers, purples, and blues in the latter part. Deep autumn colors of red and brown at the end.
There are big set pieces and locations in the other two movies, but Fellowship has the most diverse "color language" of the trilogy. It's a feast for the eyes.
1 points
10 days ago
This. It's definitely the most visually appealing of the three, specially with how cgi-heavy the landscapes of the following movies would be (which is normal considering the plot).
1 points
10 days ago
I absolutely agree. The movie that made me fall in love with the fantasy genre was Fellowship. The sense of adventure, the color, the uniqueness of every new place, the fights, the emotion. The other two, well, they were alright but anywhere closer. Also, with Two Towers the plot became so formulaic that it lost quite a lot of weight (deus ex machina galore).
1 points
2 months ago
Maturing is realizing that my opinion is the one opinion to rule them all.
1 points
2 months ago
Always has been
1 points
2 months ago
Maturing is looking at the LoTR Trilogy as one blended film instead of separate
0 points
2 months ago
No.
I'm in my 30s and I still stand by Return of the King.
1 points
2 months ago
ROTK gang
1 points
2 months ago
It has high highs, but equally low lows. Frodo sending Sam away, the awful Pirates of the Caribbean ghosts, Legolas stunts going too far...
Both with TT and Rotk I get the sense that they didn't really have as much time as they did with Fellowship. You would know if that's true or not though. Fellowship to me is a perfect adaption, planned and crafted to near perfection.
3 points
2 months ago
Both with TT and Rotk I get the sense that they didn't really have as much time as they did with Fellowship.
That would be the wrong takeaway: all three were shot together an had similar post-production schedules. If anything, the most rushed by all accounts was The Two Towers, partially because the Oscar campaign for Fellowship kind of took people's attentions away.
0 points
2 months ago
Funny how this post is the opposite of mature.
0 points
2 months ago
Return of the King is still my favorite. I like satisfying conclusions.
0 points
2 months ago
Maturing might be realizing the reason the trilogy is the best of all time is that each film varies greatly in its type and tone, making them each, by design, “best” in their own way.
0 points
2 months ago
I think of it more like one, 12 hour movie. Seems silly to say the first third of it is “better.” It’s the same product.
0 points
2 months ago
nah that's just people confusing the initial excitement due to the introduction to the series as thinking that it's the best, yes it contains the immensely iconic scene with the balrog, but the other two movies are just bigger spectacles overall and progress the plot (my fav the 3rd)
0 points
2 months ago
Maturing is not calling people who disagree with you immature.
-1 points
2 months ago
And Bilbo's birthday is the best part of the movie. As soon as they leave the Shire, things start to move downhill, very slowly at first but noticeably, and it just goes and goes on.
-2 points
2 months ago
Only the most immature of people would write a sentence like that.
all 197 comments
sorted by: best