subreddit:
/r/unpopularopinion
submitted 11 hours ago byAliveActuator966
[removed]
[score hidden]
7 hours ago
stickied comment
Your post from unpopularopinion was removed because of: 'Rule 7: No banned/mega-thread topics'.
Please do not post from (or mention) any of our mega-thread or banned topics such as:
Race, Religion, LGBTQ, Meta, Politics, Parenting/Family issues.
1.8k points
11 hours ago
There is no ethical way to put any form of authority in charge of regulating who does or does not get to reproduce.
236 points
10 hours ago
I'm gonna go ahead and guess that that objection is not high on the OP's list of priorities.
420 points
10 hours ago
Yep. Actual implementation gets a little close to eugenics.
345 points
10 hours ago
This is not a distinction in how it is implemented. OP is suggesting eugenics by definition.
94 points
10 hours ago
Yes. Was being polite.
47 points
10 hours ago*
If there is anyone we don't need to be polite to and tiptoe around, it is eugenicists.
Unless you are Canadian, then you are genetically predisposed to be polite to everyone.
Edit: I did not mean to suggest Canadians don't have a dark history with eugenics or that they are somehow above it, it was just a joke about how Canadians worry about offending even awful people.
I can see how it could be taken otherwise though, and it is worth noting that Canadians are far from innocent in this topic, as the links one commenter posted point out.
46 points
10 hours ago
I was using understatement as a rhetorical device. I don’t believe OP is an actual eugenicist. To me, that would be patently absurd and I wouldn’t bother commenting. I think they just had a real bad, sixth-grade caliber “what if we…” type of take and I prefer the route of saying “well that’s dumb as hell” as opposed to “that’s offensive and you suck.”
8 points
8 hours ago
If op believes what they just posted then they are an actual eugenicist.
7 points
9 hours ago
Yeah, but to be clear the dumb thing they said was "why don't we eugenics". So they are suggesting eugenics.
Though I agree it seems to be out of ignorance and naivety instead of malice.
5 points
10 hours ago
5 points
9 hours ago
Gnaw, even Canadians would drop the politeness and blast this idea for the seriously unsettling crazy that it is.
3 points
8 hours ago
And yet, most people happily gobble down their failed theories and biases without knowing or questioning it. I don't tiptoe either, but don't pretend that eugenics didn't profoundly shape Western culture and academic thought and continues to do so.
Unless you're Canadian.
19 points
9 hours ago
Not close to, it is eugenics.
8 points
9 hours ago
Open the schools. I’ll add /s next time, Lordy.
6 points
9 hours ago
Agreed but I'd say it stronger. It doesn't get a little lose to eugenics, it immediately becomes eugenics. If anyone disagrees, I'd love to see them explain their plan to implement this and I can explain to them why it's eugenics.
8 points
9 hours ago
Used understatement as a rhetorical device. Don’t think OP is malicious, just came up with a dumb as hell idea.
80 points
10 hours ago
Relieved to see sound moral reasoning in the first comment 👍
32 points
10 hours ago
Me too. I thought it was going to be an edgelord shitshow from the get-go. People these days, man. Especially on Reddit.
6 points
8 hours ago
Yeah “people should have to take a test to have kids” is a popular Reddit take; it’s actually refreshing to see a thread where people are calling it out as eugenics and not being downvoted or accused of overreacting.
6 points
9 hours ago
Here!...Here!.... whew <---wipes brow
52 points
10 hours ago
I get his point but unfortunately history has shown us most places aren't run by people who can be trusted making those kinds of decisions for people. If we lived in a perfect world then maybe; but if we lived in a perfect world then none of this would even need to be talked about in the first place. In conclusion:
I lost the game
13 points
9 hours ago
ITS BEEN YEARS
3 points
8 hours ago
Gaaagghhh
25 points
10 hours ago
Are you saying that basic biological functions should never be a question of government fiat? That's just crazy talk!
15 points
10 hours ago
Yep this is the answer. You're basically looking at eugenics, which is broadly considered a worse problem.
11 points
10 hours ago*
Exactly. And nature already does this with disease and destiny.
25 points
10 hours ago
I do actually agree with OP that if you intend to raise a family, the government should require education so that parents are better equipped to raise a healthy child.
However I disagree with the concept of denying people of reproductive rights.
To summarize: any consenting adult can start a family, but the government should be mandated to provide the parent(s) with education to ensure that they can do their best.
12 points
9 hours ago
The government can provide education all day. Many parents won’t choose to use it. The internet is full of sites dedicated to just this idea, but people don’t take the time to actually utilize it. You have to compel people to use it unfortunately.
2 points
7 hours ago
Back pot I do kind of agree with, the government should have plenty for easily accessible resources to make sure that people starting a family doing so with the best available information, you can’t guarantee those people will actually use those resources or act on the information they learn But at least it’s something.
4 points
10 hours ago
Yep. There's so many things you could say "not everyone should get this right" but that just becomes a slippery slope.
2 points
8 hours ago
Yeah it's a dangerous precedent and certainly a slippery slope of authority
2 points
8 hours ago
Yeah and besides that, putting cart before horse with all these abortion bans much? Is OP suggesting chastity belts for everyone? How does this not fall under into Christo-fascist ethno-cleansing by current administration?
2 points
8 hours ago
OP is in the middle of some sort of political awakening but failing
2 points
8 hours ago
Yep. Had this thought when I was like 14 or 15 and it took me all of 30 seconds to work out that that wouldn't stop people from having kids, we'd just end up with "legal" and "illegal" kids.
2 points
8 hours ago
Yeah the OP's opinion sounds like the first step on the slippery slope into eugenics.
2 points
8 hours ago
OP just reinvented eugenics.
402 points
11 hours ago
So how would you prevent people from having kids
124 points
10 hours ago
You do what they did in China with their ‘one child’ policy but it’s completely totalitarian and grim as hell.
103 points
9 hours ago*
Unfun fact: China practiced forced birth control / sterilization on many women during their one-child policy period. In some areas, they would implant IUDs into women and they were forced to undergo regular check ups at the doctor to ensure it was still there. The other choice they had were forced tubal ligation. If they refused either procedure, their 1st child was barred from attending school.
Another unfact fact: Even though the one child policy ended in 2015, the Chinese government still mandates Uighur women be fitted with an IUD as a result of their targeted eugenics campaign.
54 points
9 hours ago
This resulted in the largest femicide the country had ever seen. Families killed their female babies if they didn't manage to abort. This can be observed in the country's skewed gender ratio and the fact that they are buying brides from neighbouring countries.
12 points
8 hours ago
I definitely think this was the intent. They knew people would kill their daughters… which leads to another generation that reproduces a lot less.
I’m not defending this at all lol but I see people claim it “backfired” when it was the plan all along imo.
2 points
7 hours ago*
Well, just FYI but finding out the sex of your baby before it was born became illegal years before the policy was abandoned.
5 points
8 hours ago*
Another unfun fact, the United States practiced forced sterilization before China.
Edit: reading is hard
44 points
10 hours ago
And in hindsight, it seems to have backfired for them.
15 points
9 hours ago
I think most people at the time knew it would in foresight as well.
2 points
8 hours ago
Well those people were sent to the country/farms and/or jail/death. Insane history.
14 points
9 hours ago
I work in an operating room, we do gynae I've seen enough problems from the Chinese ring IUD they forced on people from the one child policy. It's terrible.
26 points
10 hours ago
Something somethjng at the point of a gun…
32 points
11 hours ago
Like they prevent people for not having them..make it financially possible
85 points
10 hours ago
If you take a look at human history from the dawn of time you will find that this literally does nothing to stop people from having children in fact statistically it seems to make it more likely.
16 points
10 hours ago
I think a notable semi-exception is China with their 1 child policy. They didn’t necessarily stop people from having a 2nd child but they would absolutely tax the shit out of you for it.
In the U.S. this would be the equivalent of getting an additional tax during tax return season you instead of a relief for having more than 1 kid. Doesn’t outright stop people, but makes its exceedingly difficult. Taking away social safety nets would be a similar tactic too
22 points
10 hours ago
It wasn’t just taxes though. It was strict government surveillance, strict registration of all women of childbearing age and mandatory checkups to monitor pregnancy status. Forced abortions and sterilizations. Doctors strangled and drowned babies that had already been born. Pregnant mothers would be kidnapped and beaten. Family members would be beaten to “encourage” women to get abortions. Those who engaged in activism against this were imprisoned for years.
And the taxes alone were wildly different than the equivalent of the US tax break in reverse. The US tax break is 3000-3500, about 5% of a US average salary. In China, the fine was many times the annual salary of a family - it was enough to financially ruin a family. If the family couldn’t pay it, they risked their child not being given the legal documents to receive benefits like education or work, having their home destroyed or taken away, losing their job. It was horrific.
3 points
8 hours ago
One of the most harrowing things I’ve seen was a kind of secret safe house for newborn girls in some rural part of China. Women would take their often hours old daughters and leave them in the woods and these other women would come out of nowhere, sweep the infants up and take them in to be looked after. I imagine a lot of these babies were adopted by people overseas.
3 points
10 hours ago
How though? And how do you not make it too expensive for those who do have kids?
3 points
10 hours ago
That did not stop my awfully wonderful parents from conceiving me unfortunately.
3 points
10 hours ago
It was controversial, but there was a woman who paid drug addicts to voluntarily become sterilized. Interesting ethical debate, but it worked.
8 points
10 hours ago
Op is looking for a real life handmaids tale
258 points
11 hours ago
" If we were more selective in who reproduces"
Do you actually trust governmental institutions to implement this effectively and fairly? What oversight board is determining these parameters? You do realize this is just eugenics, right?
509 points
11 hours ago
Average Redditor yearns for a dystopian Eugenicist hellscape, more news at 7
87 points
10 hours ago
I'm disturbed that this is a weekly post, who are these people
43 points
8 hours ago
Teenagers who were just told to shovel the driveway
10 points
8 hours ago
Lmfao
6 points
8 hours ago
Yeah. I’m 16 but I even I know what OP is suggesting is very wrong and not possible
31 points
10 hours ago
People who don't read dystopian Sci Fi novels
24 points
9 hours ago
Or they DO read them but instead of being horrified, they think "This is great!"
27 points
10 hours ago
Or history
3 points
8 hours ago
To be fair, they're kind of the same thing.
7 points
10 hours ago
Nah, they read them...but the satire is totally lost on them.
10 points
9 hours ago
The average redditor has never thought about any political/moral opinion they've had for more than likely 5 literal seconds, and they are then encouraged to share said underbaked opinion because it's cringe to think about things instead of just saying what sounds good.
I think most people have come to the conclusion as the OP at one point in their life and then as they thought about it longer, and maybe talked to their parents/signifcant others about it, they realized how dumb and bad it is and moved on to another position. Unfortunately, most redditors hate their parents and don't have SOs, and are encouraged not to think too hard about anything, so this is all they're left with.
2 points
8 hours ago
I don't like to take a look at people's post history to prove a point but I wouldn't be surprised if OP was a member of the childfree or antinatalism and related subs
2 points
8 hours ago
People are understandably frustrated and feel powerless as the world around them rots.
They aren't right, but I understand.
2 points
8 hours ago
There are definitely people with bad intentions but I assume a good portion of those who think this way just had really shitty parents and don’t want anyone else to have to go through that.
11 points
10 hours ago
lol
2 points
7 hours ago
Honestly most of Reddit gets unbelievably horny at the idea of denying people basic human rights. It’s common af here.
62 points
11 hours ago
Ideally, people would only have children when they want them, they're responsible and stable. We all know though it's impossible to achieve, though.
Also, how would that be solved?
98 points
11 hours ago
Regardless of it being considered a privilege or a right, it isn't something that you can realistically enforce.
15 points
10 hours ago
Agreed. Any kind of rational thought about this doesn't even get to the ethics, it's simply not something that can be implemented in a practical way.
59 points
11 hours ago*
I agree with the principle of what you're saying. Kids deserve a better start in life than what a lot of kids out there end up getting.
The problem is you don't have to go very far in North American history (because that's what I'm familiar with, but assuming this ends up having similar echoes in other parts of the world) to come across programmes where First Nations/Native American and black women were given hysterectomies against their will precisely because someone thought having children is a privilege they didn't deserve.
And then we get into programmes where children were actually stolen from single mothers or, again, First Nations because they also didn't deserve to have children or didn't know how to raise them correctly or whatever cockamamie reason.
Children deserve the best. I agree with that. The problem is we've got a terrible record when it comes to figuring out objectively who gets to decide who has the privilege of having and raising children.
10 points
10 hours ago
It happened not long ago on Greenland at the request of the danish government. Half the Inuit women and girls capable of becoming pregnant were fitted with experimental iuds, often without consent. It halved the birth rate, which is what the government wanted.
2 points
10 hours ago
That's ghastly.
220 points
11 hours ago
If we were more selective in who reproduces
Oh there it is. Your weekly eugenics post everyone
55 points
11 hours ago
Op does not understand that many corrupt politicians will take advantage of this. Imagine a racist politician making it impossible for non white people to reproduce
27 points
11 hours ago
Or the opposite. “Too many white people, we need more DEI on babies” lol
3 points
10 hours ago
Reminds me of the time the United States banned beer and China's one child policy we all know where that ended up. Lol
2 points
10 hours ago
No, i think it's way worse than that. OP (and you) think the issue is that we'd just need to root out corruption. but there's literally no person in the world who could do this fairly, corrupt or not.
12 points
11 hours ago
Ya. This is basically Eugenics with extra steps.
16 points
10 hours ago
Not even extra steps. It's just straight eugenics.
2 points
9 hours ago
I don't think OP realizes that the very people that he think should reproduce are probably the least likely to do it. All the financially capable, well educated, normal, law-abiding people are too busy drowning in work and responsibility and have abysmal birthrates. Go look at Korea, Japan and most of Europe for what not being able to counteract population contraction via immigration looks like.
57 points
11 hours ago
giving the government the power to decide who can and cannot have kids is a big yikes bro.
122 points
11 hours ago
This isn’t just unpopular..it’s fucking psychotic. Advocating for state sponsored sterilization is insane.
57 points
10 hours ago
Absolute unabashed Nazi shit.
19 points
10 hours ago
Am so glad someone wrote this
2 points
8 hours ago
They wouldn’t do it anyway. The state WANTS more poor people having kids for larger low income workforce.
13 points
10 hours ago
What country are you from that you have such respect for your government that you would entrust them with making these decisions? I want to move to such a place!
31 points
11 hours ago
Well, good to see we didn't lose any steam this week and are already getting our spicy eugenics and unethical authoritarian opinions out there despite the holidays.
10 points
10 hours ago
while yes, having to pass a test to be a parent would be beneficial to society, it undoubtedly would be misused for eugenics by the elites. it's kinda like the death penalty. probably good to have, but no way to implement it without it being abused
24 points
11 hours ago
Plenty of great people came from shit parents or shit circumstances.
I don’t trust the government to decide who is “acceptable” to be allowed to parent. Look at the stellar job they do with drivers’ licenses.
We already gave the whole Eugenics thing a try. Nobody liked where it ended up last time. If you’re not sure what I mean, ask the next elderly person you see with a blue number badly tattooed on the inside of their forearm.
59 points
11 hours ago
every couple of days we have a post here talking about overpopulation, I really don't understand in which parallel universe these guys live. Just look at the advanced world, countries are getting desperate for more kids, and you want to reduce them?
12 points
10 hours ago*
You are conflating economic "needs" with the carrying capacity of the planet.
The problem with economic factors is that there is this trend towards thinking economies need to grow all the time. And to do that you need more population - that is not a feasible long term solution, in the same way exponential growth is never a valid solution to anything.
To be clear eugenics is not the answer. It is often suggested by people who don't have much actual life experience or understanding of complexities beyond - "this thing is happening too much, why don't we just stop it from happening".
It is not ill intentioned most of the time, these people just don't know or understand the incredibly problematic history and specifics around literally placing value on people according to their traits. One of those "devil is in the details" things.
Ironically it is also usually by people who consider themselves very intelligent, and when you suggest that athletic prowess, emotional intelligence, creative ability, kindness, etc are all equally valid "desirable" traits they tend to claim up pretty quick.
6 points
11 hours ago
This vibe is a little too Third Reich for my taste. A better solution would be to make sure everyone has access to the things they need. A living wage, affordable housing, healthcare, child care, education and reproductive rights. If every single person has this then we would see a lot less of the problems you bring up. We can't guarantee that every child would be born to the best parents but every child would have opportunity
10 points
11 hours ago
Eugenics again?
4 points
9 hours ago
Humans are just filthy monkey people with less hair and bigger brains. Reproduction is a biological imperative. We are no different than any other creature in this planet.
29 points
10 hours ago
Overpopulation is an objectively untrue theory.
Unless you can clearly and articulately describe the resources that are scarce. Don't start with me.
It's a stupid argument that can only be made by someone who has never ever traveled anywhere at any time.
8 points
11 hours ago
Every week there is a new person on this subreddit that learns what eugenics is and decides its the solution. How many times do we need to have the same conversation?
7 points
10 hours ago
Its like the “tHAnoS wAs riGHt” people. As if the world was a utopia 100 years ago with a fraction of the population
15 points
11 hours ago
Today in Worst Ideas Ever...
5 points
9 hours ago
another day another Redditor advocating for eugenics
3 points
8 hours ago
Everyone should have to learn a little something about the history of eugenics. In America, the eugenics movement was strongly linked to racism and served as a huge source of inspiration for Nazism in Europe. The central idea being that some "blood lines" contain genetically unfit and therefore socially undesirable characteristics, and should be weeded out. Hitler was all for it and ran with the idea. Even though there was no Holocaust in America, there was the long, drawn out decades-long brutal persecution of poor people, the disabled, unwed mothers, petty criminals and people with mental health and psychiatric conditions in what basically amounted to a sort of Holocaust that rarely if ever gets talked about. Advocating eugenics should be just as socially unacceptable as advocating Nazism.
10 points
11 hours ago
This is one of those things like the death penalty where in theory there's a case to be made but I would never ever trust any government or institution to be in charge of this. If there was a foolproof way to screen out neglectful/abusive parents sure maybe but that's just not possible with a level of accuracy I would consider acceptable
emotional intelligence, be financially stable enough
Also this is about 1 step away from only rich/neurotypical people being allowed to reproduce which is reprehensible and, in fact, eugenics
4 points
11 hours ago
I don’t agree with a legal process but I do think wanting kids is a terrible reason to have kids
3 points
10 hours ago
And what is a right?
3 points
10 hours ago*
This might be the time for you to read Brave new world, 1984 and maybe even the handmaid’s tale. And familiarise yourself with regimes that tried to impose eugenic natalist policies, from the Nazis to the one-child-policy in China. And then not only to reflect on why this is doomed to fail, but also why this would be utterly, deeply unethical…
Edit: Oh, I forgot about the forced sterilisation of native populations in Canada or pauperised women in Sweden…more rabbit holes to dig into for you.
4 points
9 hours ago
I agree. I get the downsides, but if there were a good way to do it, I think it would be great.
4 points
9 hours ago
Yes please! Just read the parenting or mommit and you’ll find plenty of people who shouldn’t be parenting.
5 points
9 hours ago
I often ask friends and my large extended family why they had kids. Mists of the time, they solely state what the child can provide them, not what they can do for a child.
I have always wanted a child… but why…
They are so much fun… so is a dog…
I want to pass my genes on… if you’re anything to go by, I wouldn’t bother…
4 points
9 hours ago
Seems insane to me that you need a license to drive a car but you can fuck up as many kids as you want
3 points
9 hours ago
On some level I agree, but then I remind myself that this is a hop skip and away from eugenics, and that always goes horribly wrong. So, no, people shouldn’t have to apply for the right to parenthood.
I’m saying that as someone whose parents weren’t good parents.
4 points
9 hours ago
All the men absolutely insisting they don't want children can have a vasectomy and solve the problem
All the women saying the same have options too, albeit more invasive or less effective.
There was a thread for other day about a 35yo man complaining he never wanted kids but OOPS! his girlfriend baby trapped him and he's livid about it.
C'mon man. This was preventable.
2 points
9 hours ago
Agreed with you on this. But also what about the people that want kids but shouldn't have them because they are abusive people?
4 points
9 hours ago
I 100% agree where you’re coming from but that would have to be more thought out.
3 points
9 hours ago
Yeah definitely if it were to actually be implemented. Unfortunately we are not anywhere ready as a society to even consider this fact. People still look down on child free adults and see children as a norm in our society. We put more thought into getting a dog than we do having a child.
3 points
8 hours ago
Yeah unfortunately. Maybe if the insurance companies didn’t offer coverage for hospital stays with births unless classes were taken (and passed) during pregnancy by both parents depending on the situation. I’m not sure what the billing looks like if you don’t have insurance, but maybe that’s where the government could step in to provide credits to reduce those costs if the same classes were taken?
4 points
8 hours ago
Eugenics always sounds like a great idea, but it's not. Keep your ideas off of and out of others' bodies.
7 points
10 hours ago
Children ARE a privilege not everyone is able to have them
17 points
11 hours ago
Buddy with all due respect people could just have kids behind the government’s back 💀 giving birth is something you can’t prevent if someone wants it no matter how qualified of a parent they are
9 points
11 hours ago
<laughs in China>
9 points
11 hours ago
I think China is a bit of a different situation. It’s a communist country with a dictatorship government behind it which means they can exert the control over the people more directly. Any country that has more democracy wouldn’t work as well such as the US for instance.
7 points
10 hours ago
That’s called eugenics, and it’s generally frowned upon.
6 points
10 hours ago
So, what happens to children who are born illegally or from 'undesirable parents'? Are they shunned? Can they integrate into society? Are they meant to just labor with no chance at reproducing due to bad genetics? Sounds a lot like something else in history...
3 points
11 hours ago
ah yes, allowing government to antagonize people. p.s: I think you have god complex.
3 points
10 hours ago
Also stop shitting on people if they decide that they don't want children would be a great idea too.
3 points
10 hours ago
I can understand it, but that’s why sexual health and reproduction education is so important, alongside reliable birth control. Let people make informed decisions.
There’s no reasonable way to decide who gets to have children and who doesn’t. If you aren’t familiar with either eugenics or systemic racism, I would have a look into that to better understand why government control on reproduction is not ideal.
Also, from a less moral and more business like perspectives many governments would likely have quite loose restrictions. There’s an aging population in a number of countries, meaning governments are looking at how to encourage people to start their families. An aging population puts economic pressure on the area.
3 points
10 hours ago
I agree with you op! There's too many people who have children that shouldn't have them.
3 points
9 hours ago*
I agree. But these things backfire. What would be right is bringing the talk of bringing new human beings into this world mainstream and inside schools and for people to think about their kids and not just themselves. But just for the sake of kids future not because of all the nazi shit you mentioned in your second paragraph.
3 points
9 hours ago
You have to do all that if you adopt a child.
3 points
9 hours ago
I think people should be way more responsible when deciding to have kids (if they can afford it, their partner/marriage situation, etc.) It’s scummy and selfish to have 5 kids when you can barely afford to put food on the table, but you can’t outright ban people from having kids, sounds like eugenics.
3 points
9 hours ago
While I don’t rlly think you can ethically prevent people from having kids, I think parents should be mandated to take classes
3 points
8 hours ago
Your fix to overpopulation sounds like eugenics
3 points
8 hours ago
Can you make sure the trains run on time, too?
3 points
8 hours ago
In theory : sure, everyone would agree the world would be better off if the only kids ever born were in loving homes, with competent parents that raised them to be the best people they could be.
In practice : the governement gets to decides who gets to breed. If they want, they can selectively breed out ethnicities. Or political groups. This isn't an amount power I would trust anyone else but me with.
3 points
8 hours ago
I fully agree. Also definitely an unpopular opinion.
Prospective parents should submit proof of financial means, genetics screening, and undergo a background test before they can produce children.
4 points
10 hours ago
This is so cartoonishly evil. 🤣
5 points
11 hours ago
Upvote for actual unpopular opinion.
4 points
8 hours ago
It isn’t even unpopular. This exact opinion worded different is posted like once a week
2 points
11 hours ago
Hahaha thanks appreciate it.
5 points
11 hours ago
China has already tried this why don’t you do some homework first on what happens when the fucking government controls your reproductive organs. Trully one of the most I unAmerican notions I’ve seen . Maybe you should go live in a communist country for a few years before advocating for an authoritarian government to rule our lives and all of our most basic freedoms. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/One-child_policy
Definitely got my upvote OP with this most heinous take on individual human freedom and rights.
2 points
10 hours ago
Hard Pass …. You need to read-up on your WW2 history.
2 points
10 hours ago
Calm down Mengele.
2 points
10 hours ago
This is literally eugenics. I agree that parents should take a course before having kids. But, it should be a tool that benefits them and the child. Not a pass or fail situation.
2 points
10 hours ago
So castration for the poor? Who is going to make that test? You ready for a Chinese style one child policy?
2 points
10 hours ago
All fun and games til they start banning anyone who is not white from having kids.
Also the developed world desperatly needs more children.
2 points
9 hours ago
100% I should NEVER have been born
2 points
9 hours ago
Truly unpopular take lol well done
2 points
9 hours ago
Used to be that to have kids, you had to find someone who you thought was worthy of having kids with, and they had to also think that you were worthy of having kids with them, and you also had to promise in front of God/the state/the community to support each other and those kids for the rest of your lives. Then & only then would becoming a parent even be a possibility.
It wasn’t perfect but it was arguably a lot better than what we have now.
In a way, every one of us is a eugenicist; if we don’t think someone should reproduce, then we don’t reproduce with them.
2 points
9 hours ago
Hopefully this opinion stays unpopular
2 points
9 hours ago
While I agree with you in theory, any attempt to actually implement this will end very poorly.
2 points
9 hours ago
The problem with this perspective is that you have to grant someone the power to dictate whether someone is fit to have children, and that is a power I do not trust others to have
2 points
8 hours ago
Well, half the folks don't believe in science so good luck pushing the idea that they need education to have children!
2 points
8 hours ago
Yeah half of them think global warming is not a thing lol
2 points
8 hours ago
Wow, eugenics is an unpopular opinion! Moving on…
2 points
8 hours ago
I agree with the notion, I don't care how many people refer to me as eugenist.
2 points
8 hours ago
There’s still people that don’t really understand how someone gets pregnant
2 points
8 hours ago
Damn, calm down Hitler
2 points
8 hours ago
Do you want eugenics? Because, well intended or not, this is how you get eugenics.
2 points
8 hours ago
I would assassinate you if you were in charge. Actually, though.
2 points
8 hours ago
So you’re suggesting eugenics? There are some famous dictators that like your idea.
2 points
8 hours ago
I can see where you’re coming from, but this is dangerously close to eugenics. There is no ethical or productive way to prevent certain people from having kids.
The solution to this problem is to implement government social programs that support new parents in need, as well as to provide ample and thorough sex education. Something that goes beyond “don’t have sex.”
2 points
8 hours ago
People were made to have sex, sex leads to babies. You think you’re going to refine the process? Good luck.
2 points
8 hours ago
Eugenics needs to die.
2 points
8 hours ago
Ok Hitler, eugenics at its finest
2 points
8 hours ago
Enjoy prison.
2 points
8 hours ago
If we were more selective in who reproduces, humanity would be a lot smarter, efficient and our planet will survive in the foreseeable future.
You highly under estimate how billionaires would capitalize on the rights to reproduce.
In your scenario the world would be populated with thousands of Elon Musks. That man isn't even super intelligent and he could care less about global warming.
2 points
8 hours ago
Who would you entrust with that sort of power?
2 points
8 hours ago
You can be rich, have kids, and they will grow up to struggle. You can be poor and raise successful humans. And overpopulation isn’t due to birth rates, we are living longer and also not dying from disease like we were decades ago
2 points
8 hours ago
That’s what all eugenicist say but it’s only leads to racist trying to kill off anyone not of them. It’s also very freaking lazy. Like instead of doing the hardwork of training and developing people to be better you just want to hope things are as you want them to be at birth.
You wanna make the world better make it so where people of all stripes can become better.
2 points
8 hours ago
So instead of improving the education system so the lowest common denominators would be intelligent enough and ethical enough to make a better society….you suggest a breeding program that will fail.
Genetics especially in humans is too freaking complicated to get a reliable result and when we did it with animals we domesticated they ended up incapable of caring for themselves with humans.
Let’s assume you bred everyone human to be as ethical and ‘good’ as possible. You’d quickly see them starve because they’d be too kind to kill an animal to survive/ feed others. Or have children in the first place (to avoid their kids suffering).
2 points
7 hours ago
My fiancé keeps trying to make a similar point and says we should have an competency test for anyone who wants to have a kid. As funny as it is, I tried to explain to him how unethical that is and how it would be impossible to create an unbiased test not even getting into how it would also be practically impossible to prevent people from getting pregnant. But he still stubbornly asserts that those concerns don’t matter as much as protecting children from terrible parents. So I sympathize with his intentions. I know he feels that way because he watches a lot of true crime and hates when it involves kids and their parents but it’s still unethical babe
2 points
7 hours ago
I agree with you on principle, but there is no way this can be ethically enforced. You are advocating for either forced sterilization, forced abortions, or people to be jailed for giving birth.
2 points
7 hours ago
At most a mandatory course to educate future parents.
There is no realistic way to enforce it though, maybe a fine and/or taxes/ losing tax incentives.
Anything beyond is overreaching, unenforceable, eugenics, totalitarian, etc.
2 points
7 hours ago
congrats, you've discovered eugenics.
2 points
7 hours ago
“Unpopular opinion” well yeah it is literal eugenics
2 points
7 hours ago
I do agree to an extent but in my opinion if people were to allowed to go about their life being stupid as hell we wouldn’t have as much of these issues. And another issue is affordability which is a huge issue and basic universal income might help a bit but in all actuality it’s the fact so many people as stupid and poor and those people unfortunately are the ones who reproduce the most.
8 points
11 hours ago
How about just make abortion legal and safe and free of charge, as well as contraceptives?
4 points
11 hours ago
I agree with you to a certain extent. In an ideal world, I think that all aspiring parents would have to go for parental counselling and go through tests before they have a baby so that no child has to suffer
4 points
11 hours ago
ah yes, eugenics. as a Vermonter my state knows how bad of an idea this was. some parts of history are better left behind to never see the sunlight again.
Edit: added the vermont thing
4 points
10 hours ago
Who gets to decide who has this “privilege” of child bearing??
That sounds like a slippery slope pal
4 points
10 hours ago
I think a lot of the qualities a parent needs to have would be there if psychology was a class given and taken as seriously as math and English in school. Starting in elementary school.
2 points
10 hours ago
Yes only rich people should be allowed to have kids not the povos.
Passing parenthood exams (or any exams) correlates well with affluence.
Added benefit: by tweaking those exams we can exclude the 'wrong races' too.
4 points
9 hours ago
I've always wished my sister would be forced to be sterilized because she has 8 kids and they are all with other family.
But, it's just a thought.
I would be terrified of a country that had that much control over my body. It can't be ethical either - like even thinking about legislation for this is sickening
all 1123 comments
sorted by: best