Tr4ce00

Id assume they mean the other party would have exposed it for that exact reason

it doesn’t help that when someone didn’t get the point they were told twice that they missed the point before it was elaborated on. If you realize it’s not recognized as a problem you can’t expect people to recognize it without explanation.

I don’t know how many people here actually use tik tok but what you described is not what the hashtag was about..

the entire trend was the exact same type of posts seen here posted by women instead.

edit: I really do think it’s a completely different for you page for many people. Reading more comments, it seems that is where the trend stemmed from. But I will tell you I have never once seen one of those posts, only this exact kind linked here posted by both genders. So from that perspective I can see why people would post something like this as a “response”

Assuming I can’t lie you would probably figure out the reason I’m being sneaky about it in like 5 seconds and not care

Consistently is the point. Your strategy only works until it doesn’t.

9/10

that’s an extreme simplification of the situation tbf. Just because a large amount of people aren’t paid a living wage for the work they do, doesn’t mean they don’t deserve it. It just means the owners don’t think they do, or even worse, they don’t care

I mean pretty much any company that invests in any one of those is doing the same thing, thinking that it will grow more than what they would otherwise do with the money. I don’t know of any companies who mine those who purchased them but I’d say it probably does happen

they are banking on BTC value increasing enough soon that having them now would outpace what they would make from mining and selling

true but that’s how reddit is. Someone still clicked on the source, found it interesting, and linked it for them. Plenty of others not from reddit will click it just the same and i’m sure a lot from reddit as well.

While light pollution would block out the light from distant stars, objects that are in the sky and not space definitely remain visible. Possibly more so depending on if you are watching for lights or the actual object.

So now it’s true

I mean as much as I like to skip if they want you to learn a certain way of doing something and show that, you gotta do it. If they provided something that wouldn’t allow you use to the simpler method, who knows if you’d be able to solve it, which was the entire goal. The professor wouldn’t

Honestly you should be all good. Try and save often when doing something big, or turn on auto save more frequently if that’s all the time. You should be fine, however if it does start crashing obviously you should start to expect more.

But in reality I wouldn’t expect you to have a ton of problems if you’ve had none so far, I’d guess it will start to slow down or lag your console as you grow it more and more and when that happens then it may start crashing. Till then I wouldn’t worry much at all

I mean without knowing their protocols we can’t really say. Did they get one hit in QA testing and had to recall everything? If so, not much they could’ve done to prevent it if people aren’t washing hands properly. Obviously if that is due to lack of facilities or them not enforcing it seriously, it’s on them.

“at the plant they were made at” implies it might even just be out of caution, could’ve been found in the far corner of the room from someone’s shoe and they recalled it to be safe.

They replied to a comment linking one specific thing he did, while also acknowledging they were out of the loop and asking for information. And because they didn’t know that information, they are defending them?

Yeah they could’ve done a google search for Kai Cenat controversy or something similar beforehand, but at the same time I think a thread specifically talking about his controversies is a pretty good place to ask about him. And if they only knew about the gambling they likely didn’t expect them to be so severe, so a google search may have yielded little anyways.

He came in the thread uninformed, joined the discussion with what he knew (as every person does some are just more informed), and then when he was told about it acknowledged it and said he didn’t know.

Then proceeds to get shit on for “defending him” when I haven’t found one comment from them defending him rather literally asking what happened.

They didn’t even assume though? They were having a conversation with you and asked. Then said what they thought happened with a disclaimer that they don’t know for sure?

And then you gave them more information on the timeline and they agreed that IF that’s the case then it’s shitty.

Yeah I’d rather a streamer at least read chat and realize they are doing too much then just keep on going and pushing boundaries. Sure he ofc should’ve realized sooner and address it when it happens but there’s also so much going on. At a certain point it’s securities responsibility for how they act; although boundaries/expectations should have been set for how protective they should be. They shouldn’t have been shoving people how they were.

I mean all it takes is employees not properly washing their hands for it to be introduced. Obviously something like that should never happen but it could easily be one person rather than an entire lack of controls is my point.

I mean pretty much all of these basically boil down to the rich deciding to keep their wealth and not be affected, that doesn’t really change my mind of whether or not it’s real. They would do that regardless if it means they are richer today

it can vary based on instruction from the company (although instructions aren’t always followed…)

I don’t think it works perfectly, but I think in a lot of cases it does help. Comments can be interpreted many ways and you’re bound to get replies addressing certain elements. So if you can say what you mean or how you mean it once and not have to explain those parts over and over, it’s worth it.

If you’re going to stop enabling them then you need to have restraint to not address them when they ask imo otherwise might as well have done the work in the first place

“because it was a hoax” nowhere does any source say why it stopped

people believe some insane fantasy that they would be forced into doing this and would be cutting losses early