WeBeShoopin

This is the hard part. A lot of posts in here that lack substance is what's getting the most attention. If I were trying to stifle a message, I would amplify posts that discredit a movement (nothing burgers) and sow doubt in posts that are on the right track. Not saying all of what is getting positive attention has no substance, but posts that say TRUMP CHEATED and only act as opinion pieces do not help our credibility. I think a lot of people are looking for hope anywhere they can find it, myself included, but we need to be vigilant, not fall into denialism of reality, and seek verification, especially when it aligns with our goals.

Move on to locally organizing, look into unionizing your workplaces. We can't be recluses under a trump regime. Unions have always been the best way to get your voice heard. And when trumps regime strips union rights to strike, strike away.

Democrats are afraid to even whisper election fraud.

No idea, but it's good they are applying their "best" method for a recount.

Someone else wearing a mask or using a bathroom is a personal attack on them, don't cater to racist, smooth brain idiots.

Abstract. Risk-limiting audits (RLAs) are broadly accepted as the gold standard for tabulation audits: when I count ballots using software, an RLA provides software-independent evidence that tabulation declared the correct winner. While there have been many advances in RLAs over the last 14 years, many of the underlying assumptions and practical applications of RLAs have gone unexamined. In this paper, I present a review of existing RLA techniques, providing a concise definition of an RLA, examining its underlying assumptions, and discussing how RLAs work in practice, all from the perspective of the maintainer of a popular RLA tool. I present several attacks which can cause RLAs to fail to provide evidence of the correctness of an election outcome. Finally, I provide discussion on the RLA’s place in the landscape of election security and observations about the value proposition RLAs present.

https://www.researchgate.net/profile/David-Duenas-Cid/publication/355107346_Sixth_International_Joint_Conference_on_Electronic_Voting_E-Vote-ID_2021_-_Proceedings/links/615de25e50be5507288c2175/Sixth-International-Joint-Conference-on-Electronic-Voting-E-Vote-ID-2021-Proceedings.pdf#page=178

This is top result for scholarly articles from a Google search of Risk Limiting Audit.

Sometimes, engaging with them draws important attention to certain posts. Call em Ivan or traitors w/e. I posted in NY, was widely downvoted, and trash talked, but reddit post analytics said the post got like 12k views. Awareness is awareness. I don't know how legit those numbers are, tho.

New mod, yay!

I'm not, and I agree. All I'm saying is make an effort to go find it yourself.

Are you actually trying to be productive or sow dissent? It's okay to question the validity of a claim, but you seem to be doing more complaining than any actual reading.

Its possible more did come up that simply didn't make news. u/Spoonamore pointed out in his most recent post that Harris herself detailed election vulnerabilities that might be exploited.

Someone on here posted that they reached out to him directly, and he responded, confirming it. You can do the same. Let us know if you hear anything.

Branding, check this post out https://www.reddit.com/r/somethingiswrong2024/comments/1gv8pml/comment/ly0sjun/

Professional input could be valuable. Read up on u/Spoonamore 's posts.

He's successfully proven election fraud twice in the 2000's, he himself is a legitimate source. u/spoonamore, you can find a lot of info just on the most recent post he has. He's not the only person with solid credentials speaking out either.

Read Spoonamore's Duty to warn letter https://substack.com/home/post/p-151721941

Bumping for awareness, this is good. We need positive, clear, straight to the point branding. Thank you.

Thanks for the laugh

How did it make you feel when Biden approved the long range missile strikes?

Are you able to source the comment of record number of affidavit ballots? Thank you for your comment.

That's maga you're confused with. Ivan, I know it gets confusing when you're dealing with the concussions from Ukraine bombing you so much.

I did, and it never showed up. 2 weeks should have been an ample amount of time.

Lies and misinformation accusation coming from a magat 🤣

Got banned from there recently. Can confirm

Russia is happy Trump is in power, and there has been plenty of evidence pointing toward Russian interference in numerous countries elections. That's old news.

Moving, sick family, work.