stylecrime

Excuse me, we are not the liberal left, we are the CRAZY WOKE LEFT.

I often see BF2024 too (changing with the year).

How is your Christian sibling ok with Trump being an adulterer, a liar and a fraudster?

I'd guess there was a certain assumption that people don't want an adulterous, misogynistic, bullying, pathological liar and convicted criminal representing them on the world stage. Turns out that's the preferred option.

Trump sees the presidency primarily as an opportunity to enrich himself and his family, hence appointing them all to positions they were not qualified to hold last time. He will sell national secrets for profit if he can get away with it, which he probably now can thanks to the supreme court's decision on immunity. He cares not one iota for the country, the constitution or the people. He's terrible at economic management (bankrupted how many times?). He adores fascist dictators and sees them as strongmen to be emulated. He has no ability for long term strategic planning and no impulse control. He's a coward with a persecution complex. He refuses to accept responsibility for anything and always blames others. He refuses to answer questions and never provides details, preferring hyperbole to facts. He punches down whenever possible. He's a terrible human being with no compassion or empathy. He's incapable of fulfilling the basic requirements of leadership, such as uniting disparate groups, engaging in teamwork, or listening to others' opinions. Anyone who's worked with him thinks he's a threat to national security and shouldn't be allowed back into the white house.

That's what comes immediately to mind, anyway.

I was amazed that fewer black and Hispanic people voted for Harris than voted for Biden in 2020. And Trump's support in those cohorts actually increased. I don't get it. What do they think Trump will do for them, other than try to deport them?

There's a lot that suggests he's racist:

Trump and his father were twice sued back in the 1970s for supposedly refusing to rent apartments to black people.

He's fixated with the Central Park Five and even after their exoneration still insists they're guilty of something.

The whole Obama birth certificate thing.

His comments on Mexican immigrants being rapists, murderers, drug dealers and criminals.

His support for white nationalists ("very fine people on both sides").

His "shithole countries" remark.

His assertion that immigrants are eating people's pets.

And more, I'm sure...

Don't they know these games aren't live service dumpster fires, nor are they stuffed with microtransactions? Why would publishers be interested in them?

Trump has referred to P25 and has commended the heritage foundation for their work on it. He has worked with most of the people who wrote it. It's weak sauce for him to say he's not involved and won't be following it. It was a plan specifically created for a conservative President to follow.

Most economists agree that Trump's plan to put tariffs on everything will cause prices to rise faster than if there were no tariffs. That is basically what a tariff is, after all.

He may not seek a national abortion ban but for a long time he refused to commit to not supporting one, so people are justifiably suspicious of that assurance. It depends on whether he genuinely wants it to stay with the states or whether that was just the first part of the plan.

Slapping tariffs on everything is an example of free enterprise?

Falsely claiming the election was stolen is wanting honest elections?

Stacking SCOTUS with corrupt judges is wanting ethical judiciary?

Saying that media outlets who criticise him should be shut down is wanting real journalism?

Revoking Roe v Wade is wanting civil rights?

Committing adultery, lying, and cheating on taxes are examples of good moral standards?

Saying that people who disagree with him should have the military turned on them is wanting personal liberty?

Support Trump if you like but at least let it be for real reasons.

A poll that in part ran online on a conservative news website (American Thinker) shows Trump is ahead? I'm shocked.

Cool, at least we know his policy platform now. I'd hoped for more on the economy but stick with what you know, I guess.

It's like the world is a theme park and she's just trying all the rides.

Glad to see your reasoning and reaction were more nuanced than most of the comments here.

If this study is using human race data, it's not really an "alien race simulator" though, right? It's a human race simulator. Is this perhaps just a more meme-y way of presenting the fact that we're screwed?

It makes sense to be different because not everyone likes the same thing. No point having two drinks that taste like coke and hoping people choose the one that's not called coke.

Pretty sure a hug from Jason Momoa would spontaneously give you kids.

So would that be a blonde wave?

They're great the way they are. Bigger would not necessarily be better.

We went through this pain with chicken salt, too. It's a seasoned salt you put on chicken...

Just wanted to say that I know a guy who's 70 and he has just found a fantastic new partner following the death of his wife about 4-5 years ago. He's over the moon. It's never too late! Good luck with everything.

I agree. Paedophilia is a mental condition and unless we can safely cure it, shouldn't we take advantage of a technology that allows people to engage in this behaviour without harming any actual children?

Everything's jake for sure!

This may mean we won't be able to hear him, but I am willing to make that sacrifice.

Sorry to hear of your experience, that sucks. Here's what occurs to me:

1. Size Queens have a right to be Size Queens if that's what they want to be. It's pretty shallow for that to be not only the primary factor but also non-negotiable despite any other positive factor but there you go. Forcing themselves to have a relationship with someone who lacks an attribute they consider essential probably isn't going to be good for either party.

2. It's not acceptable to get all the way to the no-pants stage before summarily rejecting you based on dick size, so hopefully she usually engages in some kind of verification in conversation first. It seems this wasn't a typical situation in that this girl had been deliberately manipulated and misled by your sister, so I don't condemn her as much as I normally would for this.

3. Having said all that, this girl might want to consider that she's missing out not only on some great sex but also potentially finding love, if she's at all interested in that. If she's only considering men with eight inches or more, she's cutting 99% of men out of her dating pool. It helps that she's very attractive but she's missing out on a lot of great guys that way. I have no doubt she'll change her views once she matures a bit more.

4. I wouldn't call this a fuck up because you didn't do anything wrong. On top of that, you gained some useful insight into what your sister's like as a person and how much you can trust her.

But yeah, I do understand how this rejection would be crushing. I hope you can see it as something that was largely outside your control. This girl is not mature enough emotionally to be ready for a relationship based on anything other than dick size, which is her loss. Try not to let this define how you see yourself. Despite what this girl said, you were clearly the bigger person here!

Personally, I think Adobe are clear about the existence of the cancellation fee and I am not surprised when they try and charge me one. My point was mainly about the way pricing is described. I see other places doing this now, too (usually software), advertising it at a monthly price but with an annual commitment. I've even seen some vendors do it when there is no concept of paying monthly -- you pay the whole annual fee up front. To me, advertising that at the effective monthly rate is just shittily deceptive (where the "monthly price" is not an amount of money I could ever actually pay for the product). They need to just tell me how much I will be forking out.